What is GOING ON With Amy Coney Barrett?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лип 2024
  • Harry walks through the idiosyncrasies of Justice Amy Coney Barrett after a series of surprising opinions and dissents this past term.
    -
    TALKING FEDS PODCAST is a roundtable discussion that brings together prominent former government officials, journalists, and special guests for a dynamic and in-depth analysis of the most pressing questions in law and politics.
    New episodes every week! Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
    Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/57MG7Rv...
    Make sure to SUBSCRIBE!
    / @talkingfeds
    FOLLOW US
    Website: www.talkingfeds.com/
    Twitter: / talkingfedspod
    Harry’s Twitter: / harrylitman
    Instagram: / talkingfedspod
    Facebook: / talkingfeds
    TikTok: / talkingfedspod
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: www.talkingfeds.com/contact
    BECOME A PATREON MEMBER: / talkingfeds
    CONTACT US
    Contact forms: www.talkingfeds.com/contact
    Email: talkingfedspodcast@gmail.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @gingerjolley9027
    @gingerjolley9027 14 днів тому +1528

    She still lied at her confirmation hearing. "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me." She is not trustworthy.

    • @charitystonemountain8714
      @charitystonemountain8714 14 днів тому +19

      Popock did this BULLSHT BREAKDOWN TOO! WTAF. STOP THIS CRAP.

    • @Ronald-hx6zn
      @Ronald-hx6zn 14 днів тому +86

      They ALL stated Roe V Wade was set in presidence. Rock solid..
      FUBAR😮

    • @rikhughes6452
      @rikhughes6452 14 днів тому

      ​@@charitystonemountain8714capitols usually mean lies ie Trump

    • @KenS1267
      @KenS1267 14 днів тому +90

      She was under oath. That is perjury. She should be indicted and prosecuted as should every other Justice who lied in their confirmation. They can rot in prison.

    • @danielsteel3838
      @danielsteel3838 14 днів тому

      I agree...100% .. they need to be fired & build His Supremes butt t he trump cult= seem almost Zombie Like...
      No way could T could have Dirt on every one of them (????)😮 ... yeah ... would it surprise you all ??

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 14 днів тому +931

    "I cannot tell a lie." -George Washington.
    "I cannot tell the truth." -Donald Trump.
    "We cannot tell the difference." -The Supreme Court

  • @roseandrade2114
    @roseandrade2114 14 днів тому +379

    She has no shame and she is a liar and holier than thou. Lying under oath should have some consequences.

    • @theburnhams2925
      @theburnhams2925 14 днів тому +6

      Don't worry, it will.

    • @michaelschneider-
      @michaelschneider- 14 днів тому +9

      @@theburnhams2925 Ms. Barrett's own words .... "Praise be the Lord" .. lol ... Ms. Barrett is two faced.

    • @rauxhyde2614
      @rauxhyde2614 14 днів тому +10

      @roseandrade yup, and lying as a self proclaimed devout chrystian should have consequences as well. Any SC justice lying about anything at all is unacceptable and seriously bad news

    • @SugarWildflower-si4ox
      @SugarWildflower-si4ox 13 днів тому +8

      Sanctimonious scare me..she is in that ilk. Her and Thomas excuse themselves with religion. However she is a different cult like sect of catholic. Not mainstream neither is Thomas.

    • @elgatoblueshirts6686
      @elgatoblueshirts6686 13 днів тому +3

      Stare decisis!

  • @arthurgoodman2531
    @arthurgoodman2531 14 днів тому +90

    "Sensible" judges don't participate in Constitutional atrocities.

    • @BK-xm5nf
      @BK-xm5nf 5 днів тому +1

      LIBERAL JUDGES CAN'T HELP BUT CREATE LAW FROM THE BENCH WHICH IS NOT THEIR JOB! THEY ARE TO INTERPRET THE LAW THAT CONGRESS VOTES FOR AND DECIDES WHETHER OR NOT THE LAW IS BEING FOLLOWED1

    • @BK-xm5nf
      @BK-xm5nf 5 днів тому +1

      THATS WHY ROE V WADE WAS SENT BACK TO THE STATES FOR THE PEOPLE TO DECIDE!

  • @lindalove7193
    @lindalove7193 14 днів тому +1034

    She lied under oath and that should be enough to disqualify her and her co-horts. Stop trying to placate her. She's a rotten apple.

    • @doublecrossedswine112
      @doublecrossedswine112 14 днів тому +3

      You never lie. You are pure pristine apple. Good for you. May I bask in your radiance?

    • @laurievanzon2126
      @laurievanzon2126 14 днів тому +39

      She was interviewing for the SUPREME COURT! Not the time to lie!

    • @WinifredSmith-ew6lt
      @WinifredSmith-ew6lt 14 днів тому +38

      @@doublecrossedswine112 lying during a confirmation hearing is heinous and affects us all. Typical human lies are human and do not harm the general public. There is a major difference and have a truthful day

    • @jamesdavis5729
      @jamesdavis5729 14 днів тому +36

      @@doublecrossedswine112 Barrett is an officer of the court. She is held to higher standard. She lied, under oath, at her Supreme Court confirmation hearing. It's quite different. I will bask in how ignorant the right is.

    • @doublecrossedswine112
      @doublecrossedswine112 14 днів тому +3

      @@WinifredSmith-ew6lt Everybody lies. I wish I lived in your world but I am unfortunately on planet Earth.

  • @itsjustme373
    @itsjustme373 14 днів тому +1007

    The current scotus is an embarrassment to jurisprudence.

    • @lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252
      @lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252 14 днів тому +22

      2/3s are.

    • @GeneTurner-gg4yo
      @GeneTurner-gg4yo 14 днів тому

      100% A total disgrace, The American people have almost no respect for it, I know I don't.

    • @steveh6612
      @steveh6612 14 днів тому +13

      To the world

    • @Sleepy_Alligator
      @Sleepy_Alligator 14 днів тому

      The 6 conservatives are all liars. Three appointed by the trump pab were criminals on their first day at the court and ever since. They all lied under oath.

    • @jkang3882
      @jkang3882 14 днів тому +1

      @@steveh6612 you mean like brandon?

  • @willowvons
    @willowvons 14 днів тому +81

    We need to stop using the word "conservative" in these cases and in regard to these people. They are either "pro-fascist" or "pro-democracy".

  • @thewebdiva5903
    @thewebdiva5903 14 днів тому +97

    We can never assume that the Supreme Court will consist of honorable, honest and respectful people anymore.

    • @sloanekuria3249
      @sloanekuria3249 12 днів тому

      I'm not totally sure what you mean by "anymore". Scalia was on the court since '86, so that's almost the last 40 years with a dishonorable, dishonest, and disrespectful member of the supreme court. No, I think the difference today is that this court is illegal and invalid, starting with blocking a sitting president from his constitutional obligation to appoint a justice and moving on to unqualified appointments and open graft. They gotta go.

    • @elaineisabelle427
      @elaineisabelle427 6 днів тому +5

      True, they've shown their true colors.

    • @dennisyoung4631
      @dennisyoung4631 6 днів тому +1

      Gone back to the *Roger B. Taney* times - *Dread Scott.* (sp?)

  • @brothertaro2008
    @brothertaro2008 14 днів тому +437

    The best way to respond to this court's corruption and terrible decisions is to VOTE BLUE.

  • @sharonv5353
    @sharonv5353 14 днів тому +674

    Amy Coney Barrett lost all credibility with me when she lied and said Roe was super precedent and she overturned it anyway.
    She, in my opinion, is irredeemable and should be impeached.

    • @phillylifer
      @phillylifer 14 днів тому +26

      That's a good point.

    • @knelson3484
      @knelson3484 14 днів тому +33

      She lied in her interview!

    • @leslielevy250
      @leslielevy250 14 днів тому

      "There's a special place in hell for women who don't help women."
      :Madeline Albright

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому +31

      Plus overturning Chevron. What an absolute disaster.

    • @babetteshaw
      @babetteshaw 14 днів тому +30

      @@knelson3484Under oath! So…she perjured herself. Like the others.
      Note: Committing perjury under oath is a crime.

  • @treehugger79
    @treehugger79 14 днів тому +175

    I will never trust her. The circumstance of her appointment was disgusting.

  • @jaygatz4335
    @jaygatz4335 13 днів тому +107

    The fact that Amy was rushed through her confirmation hearings is a red flag that can't be ignored.

  • @melissaweyrick5311
    @melissaweyrick5311 14 днів тому +726

    One ruling means nothing
    Not even a glimmer of hope for her. She only drinks a different flavor
    of kool-aid.

    • @ijohnny.
      @ijohnny. 14 днів тому +15

      Good one.

    • @AnnMarieBurke-bj8dj
      @AnnMarieBurke-bj8dj 14 днів тому +25

      She's Orange -lite, instead of FULL FLEDGED ORANGE!

    • @charlesvorones3612
      @charlesvorones3612 14 днів тому +34

      She raised a good point, and then still voted for absolute immunity

    • @charitystonemountain8714
      @charitystonemountain8714 14 днів тому

      Exactly. ARE MEN NUTS? BLINDED BY the BABY TALK VOICE?

    • @ighdesigns
      @ighdesigns 14 днів тому +27

      Seriously, she’s a handmaid through and through.

  • @TheSadezoe
    @TheSadezoe 14 днів тому +466

    She didn't say any of this UNTIL AOC started talking about impeachment 😅

    • @vickisanders7120
      @vickisanders7120 14 днів тому +75

      GO AOC!!

    • @tennyceb
      @tennyceb 14 днів тому +29

      Imagine that

    • @mustapakamalmohamedkassim3336
      @mustapakamalmohamedkassim3336 14 днів тому +42

      ❤❤❤❤ AOC
      🎉🎉🎉🎉 AOC
      ❤❤❤❤ AOC
      About effing time someone with 'balls' put a stop to these democracy turncoats.

    • @cherylburkhead1334
      @cherylburkhead1334 14 днів тому

      Each of the liars need to be impeached ASAP. THEIR CHURCH STUFF NEEDS TO STAY HOME. separate church and state.

    • @Tinasburrito666
      @Tinasburrito666 13 днів тому +2

      Good.

  • @jtd8719
    @jtd8719 14 днів тому +137

    She may be inconsistent, but she's still a traitor in my book. Nobody forced her to sign on to those appalling and foolish decisions.

    • @sundayoliver3147
      @sundayoliver3147 12 днів тому

      My guess is that maybe nobody forced her-- but people who have a lot of influence over her, which she allows, very likely strongly nudged her in that direction.

  • @trs4437
    @trs4437 14 днів тому +26

    “Agenda” is the right word. And judges, at any level, should not have an agenda.

  • @sunshineinarizona1726
    @sunshineinarizona1726 14 днів тому +300

    I don't trust her. I don't trust any of them or respect the Supreme Court anymore.

    • @michelez715
      @michelez715 14 днів тому +25

      I have the utmost respect for the 3 liberal Justices, so I hope you're not including them in your condemnation. They are the shining light that shows up the murk of the rest of the Roberts court.

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому +7

      ​@@michelez715I agree.

    • @marvinmartin4692
      @marvinmartin4692 14 днів тому

      Never trust a republican!

    • @gregorypaul4351
      @gregorypaul4351 14 днів тому +1

      @@michelez715 Yes, when people speak with emotion over logic we silence our allies along with our opposition. Do we really want that?

    • @littlejerryseinfeld4168
      @littlejerryseinfeld4168 14 днів тому +3

      @@gregorypaul4351 hopefully you can temper your emotions down a bit to stop making this emotional point when you just tried this in a different comment thread and revealed yourself to be exactly what you're denouncing.
      Isn't the glass house thing a Christian proverb? I'm not a theologist, but im fairly certain it's something related to Christianity.
      To think that posting a youtube comment that's perfectly justifiable given the context is "silencing" anyone, and also perfectly reasonable that the OP is not talking about the justices who voted in accordance with the law, so again, you've been caught in the hypocrite box. I'm really not trying to be a wiseass and didn't expect you to be in the next comment down, but you're proving the point i made in the other comment thread by doubling down on your emotion vs logic argument while failing to meet your own standards, which is exactly what Christianity is known for in these times, and why people are so down on it. Not to mention that we're watching the country we've lived in all our lives get torn down by people who proudly claim themselves to be christians and motivated by their faith.
      Clean your own house, for the sake of your own religion. I've got nothing personally against anyone who follows a religion as long as they actually follow it, instead of rationalizing the bad stuff and refusing to accept the realities of what is, has , and will be done in the name of Christ. It's not JUST a christian thing, but in the US, Christianity certainly has loved to tell people what to do for my entire 39.25 years on this planet, what to watch on tv, what to listen to on the radio, who people should love, now they're just straight up pretending the 1st amendment doesn't say exactly what it says.
      What does christianity have to say bout moral hypocrisy? I'd seriously like to know because it feels like it should be one of those deadly sins.

  • @jstsayn9133
    @jstsayn9133 14 днів тому +174

    I'm sick of hearing of the religious affiliations of politicians. They're not running a church and we have.. and should continue to have... separation of church and state.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому +5

      Agree 💯🤬🤬🤬🤬

    • @scottsammons7747
      @scottsammons7747 14 днів тому +5

      It wouldn't be as bad if they required the leaders in their movement to adhere to the religious principles that they spout. Thomas is no follower of Jesus, neither is Trump. The rest, who knows. There is a definite lack of ethics and holding each other accountable.

    • @deweyrobinson5639
      @deweyrobinson5639 12 днів тому +1

      ​@@scottsammons7747 They all worship money and power, that's their God!

    • @janosjulianes3006
      @janosjulianes3006 12 днів тому

      Agree 👍

    • @clemdelafrome3570
      @clemdelafrome3570 11 днів тому +1

      Separation of church and state!!

  • @markwhite2207
    @markwhite2207 14 днів тому +56

    As a Brit, I don't get the Supreme Court...shouldn't Judges be impartial?

    • @thewebdiva5903
      @thewebdiva5903 14 днів тому

      That used to be the assumption until the republicans decided they were tired of working honorably to convince the country to vote for them. Since Trump was elected, the republicans decided to become the MAGA party and force their way into power by hook or by crook. Look to our election in November when MAGA will use their lies, force and even guns to take over the Presidency. There may never be another free election again especially with the Supreme Court making decisions about ‘constitutionality’. The majority were selected by Trump and are paid by the MAGA oligarchs to support him to the end (of Democracy).

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 13 днів тому +3

      They were before Trumpism.

    • @chipcuster2493
      @chipcuster2493 13 днів тому

      They Were Waiting For TRUMP, To Carry out The US & World Plan, for that matter. They WILL Install TRUMP, And He Will DISCARD THEM.,​@@Soapandwater6

    • @sundayoliver3147
      @sundayoliver3147 12 днів тому +7

      That's the theory. But there have been decades of mechinations behind the Supreme Court by the GOP, and they have successfully commandeered it. For the moment. I sincerely hope we're going to see more legislation by Congress, which has powers over the SC.

    • @bzh7648
      @bzh7648 12 днів тому

      Congress is dysfunctional and it is the only check we have on the Supreme Court. Thus, the SC can do whatever it wants. The lifetime appointment is unrealistic as it doesn’t allow for any method of ridding ourselves of a bad Justice other than the Congress.

  • @ApacheGamingUK
    @ApacheGamingUK 14 днів тому +27

    Call them corrupt. Use the word. Corrupt.
    The only person I've heard call these corrupt judges corrupt, is Rep. Crockett.
    Say the words!

    • @sundayoliver3147
      @sundayoliver3147 12 днів тому +2

      Rep. Crockett is a shining star and a sharply-honed weapon to those who try to bs her-- and us.

  • @ZeldaMattox
    @ZeldaMattox 14 днів тому +398

    I want her gone ASAP. It was an abomination for her to replace RBG

    • @ednalowery9204
      @ednalowery9204 14 днів тому +31

      Let me remind you that rbg refused to resign when obama could have appointed a worthy replacement.

    • @billienova
      @billienova 14 днів тому +8

      Agreed!!

    • @unclebevoify
      @unclebevoify 14 днів тому +6

      She lost every bit of respect when she did anything she did nothing

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому +17

      ​@@ednalowery9204Because everyone knew McConnell wouldn't have allowed RGB's replacement to happen by Obama. Even RGB said it.

    • @anneguetschow3932
      @anneguetschow3932 14 днів тому +2

      100%

  • @trex3003
    @trex3003 14 днів тому +276

    She's not an independent thinker. She's in two cults -- religious and MAGA. Perhaps her loyalties clash at times.

    • @user-tj8hv7vr9i
      @user-tj8hv7vr9i 14 днів тому

      Yes she was leader in a Handmaiden’s cult for college!

    • @SteveStevens-sp7ly
      @SteveStevens-sp7ly 14 днів тому

      scum

    • @gregorypaul4351
      @gregorypaul4351 14 днів тому +4

      The Catholic Church does not qualify as a 'cult" - in fact there are political and ideological extremes among the Catholic clergy and Bishops, and catholic people in general about much of moral theology and social ethics; debate goes on at Catholic Colleges (like NDU where she comes from) and other catholic circles that reflect the secular divisions in American politics (ex: Bishop Strickland juxtaposed with Bishop Daniel Flores over the charitable treatment of undocumented immigrants; or Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone juxtaposed with Cardinal Wilton Gregory over whether President Biden should be excommunicated or not) ***I wish people could stop painting people with a broad brush and lumping people into sorting boxes that don't fit; I recommend that people research topics before leveling accusations and stop flouting emotions over logic, otherwise it's just bigotry; Think about it, is that what you want to communicate?

    • @mc0wenM
      @mc0wenM 14 днів тому +3

      @@gregorypaul4351thank you. I’m astonished at the gross generalizations made about her because of her Catholicism. Clearly people have no idea about the discourse and disagreements amongst Catholics. There is no such thing as a typical Catholic.

    • @hillside21
      @hillside21 14 днів тому +16

      @@mc0wenM The cult question is not about her Catholicism, it's about her lifelong membership in People of Praise. It may not be a cult but it is hardly a movement that builds independent thinking.

  • @senghtan
    @senghtan 14 днів тому +60

    as long as Amy Coney Barrett votes in agreement with the other conservative Justices, we cannot give her the benefit of doubt ; she's still beholden to interests in the conservative right.

  • @alanjohnson2347
    @alanjohnson2347 14 днів тому +22

    If she wants to break away from the 5. She is very, very late!!!! Also this shows she was too young to be given that job.

  • @paulhenry2655
    @paulhenry2655 14 днів тому +314

    If she had a shred of integrity, she would not have accepted her illegitimate appointment.
    She will never lose that stain on her character.

    • @emjayay
      @emjayay 14 днів тому +19

      Agree, and this was not made the big deal is was at the time. A person with real integrity would not have accepted the appointment and would have explained why.

    • @striped_dtm
      @striped_dtm 14 днів тому

      100% Mitch McConnell cheated the United States of America. And this will go down as one of the most corrupt acts in political history.

    • @ginapsaki8746
      @ginapsaki8746 14 днів тому +15

      @@emjayay I agree with you. Her agreement was secured, though, before her nomination was made public. It's entirely possible (if not likely) that other judges were approached and said no. So much happens behind the scenes and well in advance in these massive processes

    • @kb6378
      @kb6378 14 днів тому +5

      There is a stain on her lips too

    • @waggishsagacity7947
      @waggishsagacity7947 14 днів тому +2

      @paulhenry2655: I AGREE!

  • @gregwalker6281
    @gregwalker6281 14 днів тому +120

    It's a shame we have to ask the Supreme Court to pick country over party

  • @eamonnmorris5331
    @eamonnmorris5331 14 днів тому +16

    "Not just ideologically/ intellectually conservative, but out and out blatantly and actively biased" - is that not what Harry is trying to say here? If so I believe he is spot on.

  • @dlcs1406
    @dlcs1406 14 днів тому +13

    This court is not conservative nor is it keeping its oath to the Constitution or to the People of the U.S.

  • @kelli8923
    @kelli8923 14 днів тому +149

    She lied. Under oath. And now we are stuck with her and all the others for the duration of their lives. She and the others that lied UNDER OATH to get their “job” should be prosecuted and dealt with. THAT is the bottom line.

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому

      They're taking bribes while ruling bribes are legal now. 😡🤬

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому +5

      She have kids it's going to come back and bite her in the butt! 🤬

    • @jeanettecollazo9616
      @jeanettecollazo9616 14 днів тому +5

      No she can be impeached

    • @teresaromanski3925
      @teresaromanski3925 14 днів тому

      Impeachment is worthless, they don't have the votes just like in the trump impeachments. I don't know what can be done, but maybe supoenaing them before the Senate could be a start. The Dems can't just let this go, hearings should be held right now, it's too important to let this slide.

    • @kelli8923
      @kelli8923 14 днів тому +5

      @@jeanettecollazo9616 Right IF that would happen though.

  • @LauraKraft-gl6uy
    @LauraKraft-gl6uy 14 днів тому +206

    I do not think she can redeem herself. Too much damage done imo.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому +5

      Agree 💯 can't walk this one back 🤬

  • @CraigShaw22
    @CraigShaw22 14 днів тому +6

    I think you are being very kind and generous in your assessment. The fact that the word ‘corrupt’ didn’t come up is surprising.

  • @psjonesi55
    @psjonesi55 14 днів тому +13

    Susan Collins, all over. "Baby steps" after damage done.

  • @nathanbutler3547
    @nathanbutler3547 14 днів тому +89

    She CAN'T BE TRUSTED!!!!!!! NOT ONE TINY BIT!!!!!

  • @debragodby7091
    @debragodby7091 14 днів тому +172

    She is NOT coming along!! She has already committed perjury, I think, in her congressional hearings. She lives in her teaching and church. Should never have been confirmed!!!

    • @charitystonemountain8714
      @charitystonemountain8714 13 днів тому +5

      @debragodby7091 DEMS must STOP acting like battered spouses. " OH he did not beat me today. Maybe he is changing." NOPE.

  • @bertillassenius8604
    @bertillassenius8604 14 днів тому +13

    Thank you Harry! It's very interesting to hear a factual analysis without poiitical perspectives! As a Finn I can never learn to accept this extremely politicised judiciary! In Finland the courts are totally independent and the judges are appointed on professional merits. Politicians, including the President, cannot affect the work and the judgements. We have learned from Hungary that this must be secured even in the Constitution, not only in regular laws and rules!

    • @peterritchie2990
      @peterritchie2990 13 днів тому +4

      From Canada:
      My best estimate is that maybe, at most, about 1% of Canadians know the name of any judges from the top court of Canada, the Supreme Court. The reason for this is that Canadian courts, for the very most part - there are a few exceptions - decide questions of law and not widespread social policy. Every judge in Canada is appointed. We don’t elect any. We don’t have judicial corruption where a deciding judge is “entertained” by a litigant. We don’t have highly politicized judges. We have term limits.
      We, thankfully, have a suitably boring judiciary and if a judge does something highly inappropriate to his privileged position we expect an honourable resignation promptly.

    • @sundayoliver3147
      @sundayoliver3147 12 днів тому +1

      Yes, we in the US definitely need to update our Constitution, and follow the lead of people who already have.

  • @helanna9843
    @helanna9843 14 днів тому +12

    My guess - Barrett isn't stupid and she sees the investigation of corruption that is being exposed and she doesn't want to get caught in the same net that is going to catch Thomas and Alito.

  • @DefaultModeNetwork
    @DefaultModeNetwork 14 днів тому +358

    ACB moderating? Maybe, but she still doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps if she’d voted against the majority opinion on the immunity case or Chevron. But she cowered and is still goose stepping along in time to a MAGA drumbeat.

  • @redwoods7370
    @redwoods7370 14 днів тому +163

    She flat out lied about what she would do about Roe v. Wade. She stated that she would leave it as is - established law.

    • @emjayay
      @emjayay 14 днів тому +13

      Not just her.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому +3

      She been bought and paid for! Sold her Soul

    • @rauxhyde2614
      @rauxhyde2614 14 днів тому +1

      Seem to me “soul-sellers” got a much closer relationship with the D.evil than gawd.

    • @redwoods7370
      @redwoods7370 13 днів тому +2

      @@emjayay You are very right! Not just her. The other Trump justices too.

    • @rickw1954
      @rickw1954 10 днів тому

      Have you never changed your mind about something?

  • @kathywallace1568
    @kathywallace1568 14 днів тому +12

    The Catholic church was told years ago if they did not stay out of politics they would loose their tax exemption. With barrett being Catholic, I'm surprised she voted with the rest of the magat judges. Does she think she owes her loyalty to trump because of her position? Shame on her. She has a mind of her own and she should start using it.

  • @raymondsmbb5794
    @raymondsmbb5794 14 днів тому +21

    What's going on? She knows the other foot is going to drop! In short order the SC ruling will become void. Congress is right now work on how to hold those justices in contempt of Congress for perjury.

    • @sloanekuria3249
      @sloanekuria3249 12 днів тому +1

      AOC read the impeachment papers in the house today

    • @j.pierce8786
      @j.pierce8786 5 днів тому +1

      Unfortunately, that will only happen when a “blue wave” comes ashore.

    • @ShawnGitahi
      @ShawnGitahi 3 дні тому

      No they aren't and if they were,they can't 🤣 but delusion is real

    • @raymondsmbb5794
      @raymondsmbb5794 3 дні тому +1

      @ShawnGitahi Your wrong! But, nevertheless, we know delusion is quite common. Look at the MAGER'S!!

  • @Sleepy_Alligator
    @Sleepy_Alligator 14 днів тому +237

    Why the gushing over this women? She's a liar. End of story.

    • @lauraholzler1417
      @lauraholzler1417 12 днів тому

      There is nowhere to go from there. Lies end conversation. It's always been about intention. Her lies weren't to help. Rather, they were to consolidate power. A "Shut up and do as you're told," as it were.

  • @libbycollins9349
    @libbycollins9349 14 днів тому +75

    A pleasant surprise would be nice, but I’m not holding my breath. She lied under oath during her confirmation hearing.

  • @JiveDadson
    @JiveDadson 14 днів тому +11

    I wish you would stop calling them "conservative." I cringe every time I hear that. It torques my jaw. They are anything _but_ conservative. Conservatives want to conserve the Constitution and the Union. They want to conserve precedents and tradition.

  • @dlcs1406
    @dlcs1406 14 днів тому +9

    She should have dissented if those are her true feelings and she was very engaged during the argument, keeping to the relative issue. She should have stood her ground instead of giving a dishonest cave in

  • @omartyre
    @omartyre 14 днів тому +243

    SCOTUS is worse than Trump at this point

    • @user-of1ld1km5v
      @user-of1ld1km5v 14 днів тому +19

      But just as dangerous.

    • @babetteshaw
      @babetteshaw 14 днів тому +1

      Rump has been / remains their useful idiot. Heritage Foundation / Federalist Society $upporter$ bought the extreme justices.

    • @quantumleaper8396
      @quantumleaper8396 14 днів тому

      BIDENS UNFIT

    • @kevindodson4539
      @kevindodson4539 14 днів тому +8

      they are working together …..

    • @kevindodson4539
      @kevindodson4539 14 днів тому +11

      @@quantumleaper8396
      Laughable

  • @lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252
    @lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252 14 днів тому +114

    Replace Sam and Clarence with 2 center left women. Toxic men need to be replaced.

    • @emjayay
      @emjayay 14 днів тому

      They are both obviously damaged people, particularly Clarence. We are all a bit damaged, but for most it's a small and not controlling part. For those two, particularly Clarence, it's what they are all about. This was transparently obvious to me at both of their Senate confirmation hearings, and I'm not any kind of shrink.

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому

      Dismiss the 6. No impeachment necessary.

    • @sg-yq8pm
      @sg-yq8pm 14 днів тому

      This video is about a "toxic" woman, of which there are plenty, are you another male fine with her because she's attractive and you think that she's a sweet innocent at heart little thing misled by the all powerful misogynistic bad "toxic men"?

    • @rorymacintosh6691
      @rorymacintosh6691 14 днів тому

      Yes, Toxic needs to be replaced. Gender is irrelevant.

    • @rauxhyde2614
      @rauxhyde2614 14 днів тому

      Pfft! Comment above you’re la lil antagonistically responding to has 79 Likes, - yours 0..

  • @hubrisonics9517
    @hubrisonics9517 14 днів тому +10

    When it comes to immunity, the world would become a better place if Donald Trump’s immune system shut down.

  • @D.A.Toaster
    @D.A.Toaster 14 днів тому +5

    Thanks for the calm, clear and concise summary. We need more just the facts like this.

  • @NGold-vi8wg
    @NGold-vi8wg 14 днів тому +106

    We Need Amy to See the Damage & Murder SCOTUS Caused->

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 12 днів тому

      She doesn't care about other people, just like all other conservatives; she only wants what's best for herself. That is very clear; she got her judgeship, and knew she had to pay back with the decision to cancel Roe, and is simply following a conservative routine as a judge.

  • @erinhanna6323
    @erinhanna6323 14 днів тому +165

    No... her bait and switch opinions just go to show how messed up she is.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому +5

      I never trusted her I always felt something was off about her 🤔

    • @erinhanna6323
      @erinhanna6323 13 днів тому

      When it has mattered to women when there is a medical crisis during their pregnancy, she made the wrong decision. The immunity decision paving the way for an American monarchy pretty much shows her complete lack of judgement, intellect and integrity. She's upended our democracy and nothing else really matters more than that...total abject failure of a human being is what she is.

  • @hectornegron9155
    @hectornegron9155 13 днів тому +4

    Impeach all these corrupt SC judges.

  • @Butterflies58824
    @Butterflies58824 14 днів тому +6

    With her rulings I think she flip flops. Just watched entire testimony by Kavanaugh for Confirmation Hearings that bothered me then. He remains a concern.

  • @OurGlobalAffects
    @OurGlobalAffects 14 днів тому +72

    FEDERALIST SELECTED ... nuf said. 🌊🗳💙

  • @debraknapton
    @debraknapton 14 днів тому +62

    Barrett can disagree with the right all she wants...she STILL voted for immunity! I give her zero points on this 😮

  • @susanhayes5186
    @susanhayes5186 14 днів тому +8

    Barrett is hedging her bets.

  • @carolknowlesphd723
    @carolknowlesphd723 11 днів тому +4

    If you lie on a job application, you can be fired. Why can't we remove any justice who lied their way onto the court?

  • @anitareasontobelieve378
    @anitareasontobelieve378 14 днів тому +114

    Why aren't they held to account for perjury to Congress at their confirmation hearings?

  • @susanzemke6569
    @susanzemke6569 14 днів тому +216

    The "conservatives" are magats, not conservatives. Coney-Barret only looks a little better because she's not quite as extreme.

    • @charitystonemountain8714
      @charitystonemountain8714 14 днів тому +18

      She IS! SHE JUST DOES it in BABY TALK and Carol Brady-wear.

    • @Rhythmicons
      @Rhythmicons 14 днів тому

      Conservatism is still an elitist philosophy of greed and bigotry cloaked in pseudo-sensible policy positions designed to perpetuate wealth disparity. It has always been poison.

    • @georgesheffield1580
      @georgesheffield1580 14 днів тому +5

      Only on one decision so far .

    • @charitystonemountain8714
      @charitystonemountain8714 14 днів тому +7

      @@susanzemke6569 YES SHE IS.

    • @GeneTurner-gg4yo
      @GeneTurner-gg4yo 14 днів тому

      Her and Kavanaugh shouldn't have been confirmed! The Dems are way too soft. Biden needs to expand the court this year and they always yield to optics when the opponent could give a damned about that.

  • @vladyslavkosulin6413
    @vladyslavkosulin6413 7 днів тому +3

    The huge problem with SCOTUS is that they decide based on their personal views, not on what Constitution says, with zero accountability.
    SCOTUS is completely broken, and needs to be deeply reformed.

  • @patriciahankel911
    @patriciahankel911 14 днів тому +19

    She needs to be impeached along with the rest of the 5 idiots who think they deserve to be on the court.

  • @Jain1906
    @Jain1906 14 днів тому +37

    I've been wondering...
    How does a 78% Catholic court represent a country that's just 20% Catholic?

    • @peter9477
      @peter9477 14 днів тому +5

      Very poorly, based on experience so far.

    • @thewebdiva5903
      @thewebdiva5903 14 днів тому +2

      That’s something that’s surprising to me. No Evangelicals study the law?

    • @canada957
      @canada957 13 днів тому +2

      Agree....and I'm Catholic!!!!

    • @suzanneemerson2625
      @suzanneemerson2625 12 днів тому

      @@thewebdiva5903
      No. They just make up their own rules.

  • @user-dl5bz9qf5r
    @user-dl5bz9qf5r 14 днів тому +37

    This should no longer be be called the Supreme Court after what they did to our justice system . They should now be called the [Supreme Injustice League] period .

    • @michellebobier-groves7821
      @michellebobier-groves7821 10 днів тому

      The Extreme Court

    • @user-dl5bz9qf5r
      @user-dl5bz9qf5r 10 днів тому

      @@michellebobier-groves7821 This should never be considered a Court any longer . They are not a court of law any more . They are now considered phonies . They are no longer a True Judge . They are now Jokers dressed in robes .

    • @elaineisabelle427
      @elaineisabelle427 6 днів тому +1

      Or the Extreme Court

  • @dmann1115
    @dmann1115 14 днів тому +3

    As a recovering Catholic (but a fan of Pope Francis), I hasten to point out not all Catholics are conservative!! Far from it, especially in America, where there is a solid history of social-minded Catholic leaders and practitioners who support the working class. Case in point: Dorothy Day, journalist and social activist who founded the Catholic worker movement and a newspaper of the same name. Too bad Amy Coney Barrett neglected to learn about her.

  • @wastingtime6417
    @wastingtime6417 13 днів тому +12

    How do you have 9 kids and feel you have the right to sentence other women to the devastation of having to deal with miscarriages that put their lives in danger?

    • @Kwk16534
      @Kwk16534 13 днів тому +4

      It takes a special kind of religious narcissist who only cares about her immediate family and Power

    • @LauraCollins-eq3ou
      @LauraCollins-eq3ou 3 дні тому

      ​@@Kwk16534power over her family- adopted poor orphans😢😢😢.Covert Narcissist to the umpteenth😢😢😢

    • @maryhybki3631
      @maryhybki3631 День тому

      Having 9 children is the tell -tale sign here.

    • @timothykeith1367
      @timothykeith1367 День тому

      What?

  • @craigkeller
    @craigkeller 14 днів тому +30

    SCOTUS loyalty’s should look towards we the people, not towards any group, party, society, organization, religious community and the like. Imho.

  • @lorrainebiggs8058
    @lorrainebiggs8058 14 днів тому +123

    I think she’s trying to save her self !

    • @thelakeman5207
      @thelakeman5207 14 днів тому +18

      She would be wise to distance herself from Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch.

    • @maximus1811
      @maximus1811 14 днів тому +12

      Exactly!

    • @TheSadezoe
      @TheSadezoe 14 днів тому +6

      You're correct

    • @annebruce5135
      @annebruce5135 14 днів тому +7

      I'm wondering if the Alito and Thomas duo is too much even for her.

    • @Johnboy33545
      @Johnboy33545 14 днів тому +2

      I agree. Let's hope when she looks in the mirror she sees moderation as her safety net and best way to save herself. Trying to save oneself can be a transformative event. I also think redemption is possible on an individual level.ACB will be with us for a long time. I'm hopeful that I'm not too optimistic.

  • @jeffmason7013
    @jeffmason7013 14 днів тому +4

    It’s not simply “her Catholic faith.” She was (is?) in a bonafide cult a step beyond the ordinary cult of Catholicism.

  • @istrumguitars
    @istrumguitars 14 днів тому +10

    An independent voice? Really wish you would lay off that corporate media kool-aid, because this isn’t tone deaf at all 🙄 She just ruled that the president should be a king. She lied in her confirmation hearings on roe. She’s a right wing activist if I ever saw one.

    • @ShawnGitahi
      @ShawnGitahi 3 дні тому

      What did she lie about again🤣I followed the hearings and u are just delusional ,she never once revealed how she,ll rule on a case

  • @jstsayn9133
    @jstsayn9133 14 днів тому +30

    If she had such a good point to not vote with the majority... why did she?

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 14 днів тому +17

    "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."
    -Robert H. Jackson, US Supreme Court Justice
    (Communications Association v. Douds, May 1950)

    • @thewebdiva5903
      @thewebdiva5903 14 днів тому +1

      I’m sure 6 justices would disagree.

  • @kimmer5370
    @kimmer5370 14 днів тому +7

    She was part of the originalist group of looking at the Constitution. Totally misinterpreting the Constitute in my opinion

  • @user-fm9vp6od7l
    @user-fm9vp6od7l 14 днів тому +2

    I watch from Canada with great alarm at what is happening in the USA. Not only many US citizens are frightened but so are we, you neighbour freaked out! Hope you can dove this huge problem.

    • @dsddala467
      @dsddala467 10 днів тому

      Don't count on it. The US Education System is laughable. People actually graduate high school and can't even read. G. Bush gave us "no child left behind," which mandated nothing but multiple choice testing and teaching for the test. Most Americans cannot think critically. That's why a good portion are in Drumpf's cult.

  • @user-ye1sw5yv1e
    @user-ye1sw5yv1e 14 днів тому +14

    That doesn’t mean crap. She voted saying that Donald Trump has total immunity. So to me that just keeps her with the other six.

  • @finzenberger
    @finzenberger 14 днів тому +98

    and all the elderly gentlemen are falling for her … she‘s a stonecold hard-boiled conservative!

    • @Rhythmicons
      @Rhythmicons 14 днів тому +4

      Mark Meadows was hardcore checking her rear end out on the first day of her confirmation hearings.

    • @Johnboy33545
      @Johnboy33545 14 днів тому +2

      @@Rhythmicons Every straight male in the room was scoping her out and some of the women too.

    • @greatedges
      @greatedges 14 днів тому +8

      It's no matter that she makes a teeny-weeny step by asking a perceptive question here and there about the decision she signed onto. When push comes to shove, she will always bend toward MAGA decisions. She has a long way to go before she deserves much respect.

    • @Rhythmicons
      @Rhythmicons 14 днів тому +1

      @@Johnboy33545 But this was an upper-echelon government function that was televised and he wasn't even discreet about it. Not to mention how he disrespected Debbie Meadows.

  • @terencequinn2682
    @terencequinn2682 14 днів тому +4

    To us in Europe the idea of an intellectual Catholic is kind of hard to understand. Nine children says “ to hell with the planet” too.

  • @catherinemushaw1956
    @catherinemushaw1956 14 днів тому +27

    She needs to resign

  • @toi_techno
    @toi_techno 14 днів тому +92

    "Justifiably"???
    it's shocking that someone with such a primitive worldview is sitting on the SCOTUS

    • @DSAK55
      @DSAK55 14 днів тому +6

      46% of Americans have a primitive worldview and will continue after November

    • @anthony27334
      @anthony27334 14 днів тому +2

      Little House on the Prairie !!!! lol

  • @margarethughlett9428
    @margarethughlett9428 14 днів тому +15

    Term limits!!

  • @TheRaspberry82
    @TheRaspberry82 14 днів тому +5

    She is a Stepford Wife / Handmaids Tale who may be trying to break out 😮 !

  • @NexPutax
    @NexPutax 14 днів тому +1

    Harry, I so respect you for the disclosures you gave in the first 4 minutes of this post. Every success to you in this project that loves the primacy of LAW in our lives. Thank you, sir.
    PS - I've always felt it'd be great to share a beer over a burger with you. Cheers!

  • @daciefusjones8128
    @daciefusjones8128 14 днів тому +61

    there is nothing complicated about it they are CORRUPT and need to go to jail and serve out their life time appointments there.

  • @Mia-Walker7
    @Mia-Walker7 14 днів тому +127

    She wants to try to maintain some credibility

    • @carlhunter3844
      @carlhunter3844 14 днів тому +10

      Because she knows she was wrong on so many levels. Her conscious is eating at her claim to be Christian and allowing a criminal to escape justice.

    • @Terry-lh8cn
      @Terry-lh8cn 14 днів тому +11

      You mean "gain some credibility "

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому +7

      She'll gain credibility when she RESIGNS.

  • @sherribogdanowicz9120
    @sherribogdanowicz9120 14 днів тому +8

    EVIL 6

  • @rogerdc7279
    @rogerdc7279 14 днів тому +1

    Thank you for your long and detailed talk about the Supreme Court.

  • @dfuher968
    @dfuher968 14 днів тому +19

    Having ideological judges is bad enough. Just the talk about "conservative judges" and "liberal judges" is outrageous to us non-Americans and points to a weird acceptance of a judicial system, that is not neutral, as it should be. But partisan judges? Thats destructive to any kind of justice, when u can just "shop" for forums, where u can be assured verdicts based on political partisanship.

    • @chipcuster2493
      @chipcuster2493 13 днів тому

      Bought & Paid for, by The Federalist Society. THEY Call The Shots. ROE, Was Planned, Now, For 50yrs. Every Conservative Judge, Appointed By Trump, WAS A Federalist Choice. THEY Were THE Only Choices, He Had.

  • @franvarga709
    @franvarga709 14 днів тому +22

    She is "different" from the conservative majority because she is a woman and mother. Which is to say, not very much different.

  • @d.p.89
    @d.p.89 14 днів тому +4

    “In every country and in every age, the priest (religious fanatic) has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.” ― Thomas Jefferson

  • @billienova
    @billienova 14 днів тому +2

    So thankful for you Harry !! ❤❤❤

  • @thestraightroad305
    @thestraightroad305 14 днів тому +20

    Thank you. This was a very interesting analysis. I’ll keep my eyes open where she’s concerned.

  • @blb1954
    @blb1954 14 днів тому +38

    She ,as did the others; lied at their confirmations. They would leave Roe vs Wade alone , for one.

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому

      They lied about a lot of things, including protecting the Constitution. They don't even believe in the Constitution! King Biden MUST dismiss the 6. No impeachment necessary, they've waived it.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому +1

      Power and money just saying!🤬🤬

  • @jupitor919
    @jupitor919 12 днів тому +1

    Thank you for your clear eyed assessment of the
    “Supreme “ court. We need you to help guide us through this issue..

  • @draco1157
    @draco1157 13 днів тому +3

    Corrupt, more corrupt, SCOTUS (9-3) 🙈🤢🙈🤢🙈🤢

  • @paulyoung4422
    @paulyoung4422 14 днів тому +15

    Religion and the Law, should never mix.

  • @johnellington1932
    @johnellington1932 14 днів тому +20

    Faith without reasoning is Fanatism.

    • @flowergarden-1
      @flowergarden-1 14 днів тому

      If ACB is a true Catholic Christian, she'll show through her dissenting project 2025 mandates, and putting into practice, compassion for migrants, refugees, immigrants, and the homeless. Jesus himself said " the Son of Man had nowhere to lay His head."

    • @jonnawyatt
      @jonnawyatt 14 днів тому +1

      ​@@flowergarden-1
      Jesus also cursed the fig tree because he had a tantrum. 😊

    • @jonnawyatt
      @jonnawyatt 14 днів тому +1

      Faith and reason. Not compatible.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому

      Yep!!!💯

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому

      ​@@jonnawyattthat's a good one!🤣🤣🤣

  • @NathanDean79
    @NathanDean79 14 днів тому +4

    It’s still a dirty word to be a conservative again. I think it should be again.

    • @grracegrracy2730
      @grracegrracy2730 14 днів тому

      Because CON servatives are dirty liars...always on the take.

  • @dea6607
    @dea6607 14 днів тому +5

    I have no respect for Barrett and never will.

  • @nicolerodekuhr7130
    @nicolerodekuhr7130 14 днів тому +17

    Lied during her confirmation.

  • @maryshkamiceli8388
    @maryshkamiceli8388 14 днів тому +15

    Could you discuss the move in Congress to reverse the SC's immunity decision?
    What's the likelihood of that happening (before the election)?

  • @lyledal
    @lyledal 14 днів тому +8

    I wish y'all would quit giving her *any* credit. She does not deserve it.

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому

      Right 💯 she's supposed to be a intelligent reasonable person! That the American people supposed to trust. Can't turn that back at this point 🤔🤬

  • @dawnfinn3843
    @dawnfinn3843 14 днів тому +7

    Amy is not Catholic
    she has been a member of the Christian parachurch community People of Praise,[220] an ecumenical covenant community founded in South Bend. Associated with the Catholic charismatic renewal movement but not formally affiliated with the Catholic Church

    • @user-or4jw2jj4n
      @user-or4jw2jj4n 14 днів тому

      True!

    • @Butterflies58824
      @Butterflies58824 14 днів тому

      @@dawnfinn3843 sometimes I think Americans just dream up different churches, name them and it seems individuals only set these up so they can lead a cult. Heard their own ‘flock’! It’s weird why Americans in their social culture tend to do this?? I can’t think of too many examples outside America of this phenomenon.

    • @ediedaley3701
      @ediedaley3701 21 годину тому

      She’s deeply Catholic! That she’s also ecumenical is a good trait!