According to me accuser(woman) name should be named and published, so that other man can come forward and say if the woman accuser tried to take advantage through sexually on other men. There are women who try sexual attract men to exploit money, if the woman accuser name is published other men who experienced this will come farword to tell the dark side of the woman.
That's the argument they are using in justifying naming the accused, but they won't use that logic to justify naming the accuser. It's total hatred for men generally.
No. If someone has raped one person it's likely they've done it before and seeing that someone has finally come forward can allow others to have the courage to do the same. If someone is accused and found innocent then they're cleared and...that's the end of it.
Anonymity until charge!
According to me accuser(woman) name should be named and published, so that other man can come forward and say if the woman accuser tried to take advantage through sexually on other men. There are women who try sexual attract men to exploit money, if the woman accuser name is published other men who experienced this will come farword to tell the dark side of the woman.
That's the argument they are using in justifying naming the accused, but they won't use that logic to justify naming the accuser. It's total hatred for men generally.
The false rape accusation isn't 2% it's actually closer to 40%
No.
No. If someone has raped one person it's likely they've done it before and seeing that someone has finally come forward can allow others to have the courage to do the same. If someone is accused and found innocent then they're cleared and...that's the end of it.