Wow, such a great explanation. I've seen many videos explaining this type of stuff, some by real pilots and I really like the way you chose to do this. Especially with those red boxes telling us where to look. As sometimes it's difficult to know where to look because things happen quickly. Looking forward to checking out the other videos on your channel!
Thanks. I am a real pilot too so my video can be one of those videos done by real pilots that you speak of :) . I’ve never done this approach in the real world but it’s definitely very unique with the glide slope being double that of a normal approach. There is a lot to watch and learn on the channel. Enjoy it!
I’m still doing highlight boxes almost three years later on current videos. They make the tutorial so much easier to understand along with editing vs talking while flying around for 50 minutes.
REALLY enjoy the difficult / complex approaches you demonstrate, esp combined with the Garmins. Another great aspect is that you work within the limitations of the sim systems while also pointing them out.
@@thecorporatepilotdad IMHO, much more valuable to demo how we CAN get stuff done in MSFS. I've got x-plane, P3D & DCS if I want study-level-correct airplane models - but MSFS is a much more satisfying experience in general. I'm perfectly fine hanging out in Longitude & TBM when real world pilots like you are using them to demonstrate real world procedures. For me, it's the piloting that's more important than the aircraft.
@@clankilpatrick4417 I agree with you. I started on a video wish list/items that need fixed but that's not my style (although, I would love to see a screen sharing option in FS2020 where two people can act as a crew and manipulate the cockpit like in real life. Have a pilot flying and a non-flying pilot that does radios, FMS, switch flipping etc. I think that would be awesome). I have a better idea that will help you and everyone else with the TBM. I will start working on that video tomorrow as long as everything works the way it should.
Hello, really nice piece of video. Thanks for that. But one question got into my mind - how come that the in-game glideslope starts at 2000 feet 3.9 NM away from ILST while your procedure plate says the glideslope should start at 3.4 NM at 2000 feet? According to that plate you are too low for the whole final on every point, but in the game you are pretty well aligned with the glideslope. What I’m missing? Cheers and happy holidays!
That is a great question. I had to pull the chart up and look at the video again. At the end of the video, the altimeter was off by 110 feet. I set it automatically by pressing the B key before I started the approach, but when I landed the altimeter setting had changed at some point and it wasn't reset. That would have made the airplane not be at 2000 feet true altitude but higher which would explain why it intercepted the glideslope at a greater distance. I tried it again just now and I set the altimeter around the 5.0 DME and it intercepted at 3.7 DME. Maybe the GS isn't exactly 5.5 degrees. That is the best explanation I have.
Wow, such a great explanation.
I've seen many videos explaining this type of stuff, some by real pilots and I really like the way you chose to do this. Especially with those red boxes telling us where to look. As sometimes it's difficult to know where to look because things happen quickly.
Looking forward to checking out the other videos on your channel!
Thanks. I am a real pilot too so my video can be one of those videos done by real pilots that you speak of :) . I’ve never done this approach in the real world but it’s definitely very unique with the glide slope being double that of a normal approach. There is a lot to watch and learn on the channel. Enjoy it!
and you highlighted the areas on the PFD to correspond with your instructions, something most youtubers don't bother with. Thank-you
I’m still doing highlight boxes almost three years later on current videos. They make the tutorial so much easier to understand along with editing vs talking while flying around for 50 minutes.
REALLY enjoy the difficult / complex approaches you demonstrate, esp combined with the Garmins.
Another great aspect is that you work within the limitations of the sim systems while also pointing them out.
Thank you. There is a lot wrong with FS2020. I want to do a video on some major errors but I don't want to be a "Debbie-Downer".
@@thecorporatepilotdad IMHO, much more valuable to demo how we CAN get stuff done in MSFS. I've got x-plane, P3D & DCS if I want study-level-correct airplane models - but MSFS is a much more satisfying experience in general. I'm perfectly fine hanging out in Longitude & TBM when real world pilots like you are using them to demonstrate real world procedures. For me, it's the piloting that's more important than the aircraft.
@@clankilpatrick4417 I agree with you. I started on a video wish list/items that need fixed but that's not my style (although, I would love to see a screen sharing option in FS2020 where two people can act as a crew and manipulate the cockpit like in real life. Have a pilot flying and a non-flying pilot that does radios, FMS, switch flipping etc. I think that would be awesome). I have a better idea that will help you and everyone else with the TBM. I will start working on that video tomorrow as long as everything works the way it should.
Actually the steepest ILS approach in the world is Lugano Airport with 6.65°!
great video!
Thank you. I love it when people find this video. It's a very unique approach.
Hello, really nice piece of video. Thanks for that. But one question got into my mind - how come that the in-game glideslope starts at 2000 feet 3.9 NM away from ILST while your procedure plate says the glideslope should start at 3.4 NM at 2000 feet? According to that plate you are too low for the whole final on every point, but in the game you are pretty well aligned with the glideslope. What I’m missing? Cheers and happy holidays!
That is a great question. I had to pull the chart up and look at the video again. At the end of the video, the altimeter was off by 110 feet. I set it automatically by pressing the B key before I started the approach, but when I landed the altimeter setting had changed at some point and it wasn't reset. That would have made the airplane not be at 2000 feet true altitude but higher which would explain why it intercepted the glideslope at a greater distance. I tried it again just now and I set the altimeter around the 5.0 DME and it intercepted at 3.7 DME. Maybe the GS isn't exactly 5.5 degrees. That is the best explanation I have.