@@sanketjaiswal9855 is it a mistake? He took some time explaining how "the first meet point is different". Based on that logic, the (d), and (e) wouldn't have been a proper semilattice too. My guess is also that this is a mistake, a very confusing one.
Everything is fine in the video. There is no mistake. GLB of (d,e) is Phi because LB = {a,b,c} Lets check for GLB : a - All elements of LB related to a ? No [Using Hasse Diagram] b - All elements of LB related to b ? No [Using Hasse Diagram] c - All elements of LB related to c ? Obviously No [Using Hasse Diagram] So, GLB = Phi
His explanation is soooo clear
Great lecture
Very helpful 👌👌🇮🇳
He is really good. 💗
What is the name of this text book?
Sir make a best video on data science
How much more lectures to come on Discrete Math??
Thank you😀
Thanks
8:25 - R u sure ?
its an error ig , a is the GLB for d and e
@@sanketjaiswal9855 c is the GLB for d and e
@@sanketjaiswal9855 GLB=b and c
@@sanketjaiswal9855 is it a mistake?
He took some time explaining how "the first meet point is different".
Based on that logic, the (d), and (e) wouldn't have been a proper semilattice too.
My guess is also that this is a mistake, a very confusing one.
Everything is fine in the video. There is no mistake.
GLB of (d,e) is Phi because LB = {a,b,c}
Lets check for GLB :
a - All elements of LB related to a ? No [Using Hasse Diagram]
b - All elements of LB related to b ? No [Using Hasse Diagram]
c - All elements of LB related to c ? Obviously No [Using Hasse Diagram]
So, GLB = Phi
I feel like I am learning formal language and auto mata theory sometimes.
As a data scientist