1:43 ah yes great idea! Go drive alongside and try to pass a vehicle whose lane discipline is atrocious. Don’t drive like that and these idiots won’t cause you problems.
#66 Whoever wrote that statement is as dense as the flatbed driver. The car was already on the roundabout before the flatbed was anywhere near it (you can see it at 31:17 on the left). Therefore the flatbed should have slowed and waited. The car is doing a full loop of the roundabout and going back the way that they came. The give way to the right rule does NOT give cars with supposed priority the right to steam onto a roundabout if there are already cars on the roundabout.
#5 , never will understand why anyone would fly onto a roundabout next to any car or van and not expect people to change lanes without looking indicating ect , just hold back, seriously people are going onto roundabouts like it's whacky races!.,🤦♂️🤷♂️
Especially when the guy had 10 seconds previously already sliced across another lane with no apparent observation or indication, the last thing I'd want to do is slip up the inside lane! I wonder if there will be any viewers who didn't see this coming a mile off...
I don't even have my car license yet. I've got a CBT and even I know common sense says you hold back on roundabouts, staggered positioning because people may need to quickly change lanes. And. As someone else said, undertaking mate, proper stupid.
24:10 And everybody *did* clap! Well done to the coach driver and the coach engineers for putting suitable discs and pads / air brakes into the coach's design specification! Good on the lorry driver in lane 1 for giving the coach a possible escape route.
#79 it's funny, you see "HGV driver forces his way through", but I see "VW driver carefully and sensibly holds back to give the HGV a chance to get round". The HGV had to come at some point, the less time he spends stuck on the corner the safer it is for everyone. Kudos to the VW driver for doing the right thing and giving him room.
52:25 Vid 109, Where exactly would you have gone trying to overtake a solid run of traffic? The HGV stopped you from overtaking where there was no space to merge back into traffic. The only way you could have merged back in is if you had completely cut up the HGV that stopped you. Gees!
#47 OK the lorry driver left it too late to enter the exit lane and should have gone on to the next exit. But come on, how difficult would it be to have given them the space to exit. The obstinate driver refusing to the let the lorry exit clearly doesn’t believe in courteous driving, to me they are equally being irresponsible. Less obstinacy and a bit more of courtesy doesn’t harm anyone.
#109 51:55 - You didnt have room, for the speed you were going other road users would have had to slow down more than they needed to, to accomodate you and a space for you. You would have had to push in. You're a helmet.
It was tight, but it’s no excuse for the lorry driver attempting to murder them. That’s so unbelievably out of line. Yeah sure it was a 50/50 chance to pass, but forcing someone out into an oncoming lane at 50mph with a 44t vehicle should be jail time for attempting murder
66 (31:15) - Looks to me like the Corsa was already in the roundabout when the flatbed lorry driver entered the roundabout, couldn't be clearer, flatbed fault.
#16 has be cackling! He sounds more embarrassed at being caught singing than the near miss (which was his fault for going too fast towards a blind corner)
#82 Yes the HGV should not have done it, but wher were the cammers brain cells. Safer to use your brakes to get yourself out of trouble, instead of the horn in the hope that the HGV will let you past.
At 1:36, I wouldn't have tried to undertake that van, to me it always looked like he was going to cut you up, not your fault but an accident could have happened and you could have easily avoided it.
@@sonnyday6210 Passing on the left approaching traffic lights, is not classed as undertaking, it is passing and the van driver was not indicating to change lanes, he obviously did not check his mirrors. Undertaking is not an offence, there is no law against it, it can be classed as dangerous or careless driving but that depends on when the undertake was done.
At 1:32, he's driving recklessly why would you drive alongside? At 2:51 indicates right, then swings out on the left with no indicators. Cam driver at fault.
On a main road you are supposed to keep as much open space for oncoming traffic if you have to cross. I could hear an indicator. And wether or not he was indicating or not, he wasn't moving, so traffic from behind should come to a stop as well.
At 31:26 as the car entered the roundabout it was clear to do so had it gone left or right but, it did a U which makes the Transit at fault as..the vehicle turning down the road to the Transit Driver's Left was clearly on the roundabout before the Transit arrived & as Give way to the right, is the rule, the car was on the Transit's right seconds before the accident..or unwritten rule of the road...Always expect the Unexpected !!
It used to be custom that if you had a baby and didn't want it that you'd leave it outside the church to be discovered - hence the term "Foundling Child"
At 11:32, we should all have a bit more consideration for the drivers of large vehicles, if they don`t take the opportunity when it is there they could sit there for ages before anyone will let them onto the roundabout.
#66 The Corsa, yes he was on the roundabout & probably indicating right but that was to tell other motorists that he was turning right not doing a U-turn.
In Australia you are supposed to give way to the Vehicle ON the Roundabout. But most giveway to vehicles on the Right obviously they are already on the roundabout.
At 8:39, that was a perfectly safe pass, it may not have been the full one and a half metres but it is not always easy to achieve that, as long as it is not at speed and safe, what does it matter?
The tool on the bike thinking he is some vigilante good not have complained if he got a slap. I think every driver has had a cheeky look at the phone in stationary traffic including the police.
The most it’s caused in my 35 years of driving is holding traffic up. I’m not on about driving using the phone I’m on about sitting still using the phone.
@@kevinbrown9521the guy was literally on video using the phone before coming to a stop. What if there was a biker waiting in the queue? He could have just driven right over them. All you’re doing here mate is outing your own illegal and stupid behaviour
#53 Weeee! Think you need a front weight on that there John Deere bud. also that bike on the right in the bike bit looks a bit big.......................
In this case, the yellow box is only on one side of the road and intended to keep the side closest to camera clear of traffic. The part of the rule you cite is when the yellow box covers both sides of the road and you cannot complete a right turn due to oncoming traffic or other right turning vehicles in front of you. There's a diagram on the website showing this more clearly. It does not state you can turn right against oncoming traffic then stop causing that traffic to take evasive measures (or not in this case) because a bike stopped half out of their junction and started dithering. The bike, the car, and the pick-up all had a hand in this one and I would say not one was fully to blame. For want of a nail and all that.
5:50 Why does the law allow ridiculously wide agri vehicles on the roads? No escort, no special training required and the arrogance to block the roads. If it doesn't fit in half the width of the road it should have a wide load escort.
Most agricultural vehicles travel no more than a mile or two between locations. Farmer probably lives in that village and has only one route between fields. How much do you think food would cost if they had to pay for escort vehicles?
That cyclist who thinks he is always right is exactly why they should be licensed and insured. I doubt he could pass any test. Maybe when a cyclist gets a dash cam they drive like dorks or maybe only dork cyclists get dash cams.
I like how everyone is more concerned about the baby than the harvester choosing a bad village route to the farm. They may yet be some hope for humanity. That being said, it used to be very normal to leave children in pushchairs outside shops etc... I believe this is how my great aunt almost lost track of a child (she forgot how many children she had at the time)
#110 Mini driver was well in front of the Enterprise van prior to it trying to merge, the van should have given way as the mini was using the full length of the slip road to merge into the slow traffic ( undue care & attention) but the van decided he wasn't going to let him & guess what an accident but guess what that was the Mini's fault for failing to stop in time cause he was annoyed at the van driver.
Funny how BG65 EBC is taxed till June 24 but has not had MOT since November 22, No Insurance then either me thinks. Most of the Reg's checked have No Tax or MOT or both. Also AO59 PPZ no MOT or Tax, might explain why he ran??
@@lucyh9260 You can tax (ved) a vehicle without MOT if you have monthly payments, my car has not had an MOT since it was due in January but I can still get the VED due to monthly DD payments
55# Sometimes it's better not to put yourself in danger by riding right next to a dangerous phone user. You could have startled him enough to swerve into you. Please be safe.
77# when a tesla driver says someones went fast past them it's saying something but when it's on roads 1.5 size of a lane it's get rid of license stuff
#105 Actually it's IMPATIENT TRACTOR DRIVER who couldn't be bothered to slow down enough so the car driver who was already passing several cars heading for a suitable gap to pass to get to that gap.
#33, there should be a compulsory set of road standards for cyclist's before they are even allowed on the road, Insurance or some form of damage cover should be compulsory for bicycles as well. you ARE supposed to dismount a bike to cross a road even at a crossing.
what is this person driving / riding in 1st video? seen him multiple times.. uncertain if they're just a troll as they keep finding themselves in bad situations!
39.40 - that was your fault - nothing worse than someone joining the motorway and then speeding up like a twerp - the lorry was doing what he should and that was to move to the left lane.
1 hour video is far too long. It becomes boring watching the same near misses/ occasional hits and I lose interest. 20-25 minutes twice as often please.
How about blurring the reg plates of innocent drivers on these clips? You make it easy for criminals who clone plates by showing every car registration they come across
I think all sub-standard drivers should be forced to re-take the driving test until they get it right.. and if they can`t they should be banned for life! Remember patience is a superpower!
But they did take a test till they got it right. What'll happen is they'll take the test and go back to sub-standard driving. Like they done after the first test
No.5, you created that incident.
How? He cut him off
1:43 ah yes great idea! Go drive alongside and try to pass a vehicle whose lane discipline is atrocious. Don’t drive like that and these idiots won’t cause you problems.
His own lame discipline is just as bad as he is speeding to get into his blindspot. Terrible driving
#66 Whoever wrote that statement is as dense as the flatbed driver. The car was already on the roundabout before the flatbed was anywhere near it (you can see it at 31:17 on the left). Therefore the flatbed should have slowed and waited. The car is doing a full loop of the roundabout and going back the way that they came.
The give way to the right rule does NOT give cars with supposed priority the right to steam onto a roundabout if there are already cars on the roundabout.
#5 , never will understand why anyone would fly onto a roundabout next to any car or van and not expect people to change lanes without looking indicating ect , just hold back, seriously people are going onto roundabouts like it's whacky races!.,🤦♂️🤷♂️
Especially when the guy had 10 seconds previously already sliced across another lane with no apparent observation or indication, the last thing I'd want to do is slip up the inside lane! I wonder if there will be any viewers who didn't see this coming a mile off...
@@MrBinabanana it's almost like people drive by braille these days, probably explains why they crash into each other. 🤦♂️🤷♂️
❤❤The white van filming was in the wrong in the first instance for undertaking- especially in a roundabout.
I don't even have my car license yet. I've got a CBT and even I know common sense says you hold back on roundabouts, staggered positioning because people may need to quickly change lanes. And. As someone else said, undertaking mate, proper stupid.
Jesus #5, the white van is driving like a complete choad, so why would you get anywhere near it?
Cammer was complete moron. Why would he put himself in that position?
Because he's not much better himself?
Because the cammer was an incompetent driver?
@@type17 I agree, his behaviour after showed just what a knob head the cammer really was.
@@type17 They were both awful for sure!
24:10 And everybody *did* clap! Well done to the coach driver and the coach engineers for putting suitable discs and pads / air brakes into the coach's design specification! Good on the lorry driver in lane 1 for giving the coach a possible escape route.
5:18 Ehrm… where is the parent?
I was wondering myself!
yeah why the baby just there
5:18 so we not gonna talk about the baby just left on its on lmao
Came here to see if anyone else noticed 😂 had to rewind a few times 👀😳
5:19 baby in the pushchair ......🤔🤔🤔
#79 it's funny, you see "HGV driver forces his way through", but I see "VW driver carefully and sensibly holds back to give the HGV a chance to get round". The HGV had to come at some point, the less time he spends stuck on the corner the safer it is for everyone. Kudos to the VW driver for doing the right thing and giving him room.
52:25 Vid 109, Where exactly would you have gone trying to overtake a solid run of traffic? The HGV stopped you from overtaking where there was no space to merge back into traffic. The only way you could have merged back in is if you had completely cut up the HGV that stopped you. Gees!
I completely agree with what you've said but in all fairness, the truck driver should really have hugged the centre line a couple of seconds earlier,
2:55 You can here the Sprinter's ABS kicking in
#47 OK the lorry driver left it too late to enter the exit lane and should have gone on to the next exit. But come on, how difficult would it be to have given them the space to exit.
The obstinate driver refusing to the let the lorry exit clearly doesn’t believe in courteous driving, to me they are equally being irresponsible. Less obstinacy and a bit more of courtesy doesn’t harm anyone.
I think what’s more important is that whose baby is that left there unattended?😐 5:17
#109 51:55 - You didnt have room, for the speed you were going other road users would have had to slow down more than they needed to, to accomodate you and a space for you. You would have had to push in. You're a helmet.
It was tight, but it’s no excuse for the lorry driver attempting to murder them. That’s so unbelievably out of line. Yeah sure it was a 50/50 chance to pass, but forcing someone out into an oncoming lane at 50mph with a 44t vehicle should be jail time for attempting murder
Lovely to hear Steve Right on the radio!
25:52 "Handbrake UP"... as he pulls the handbrake up hahahaha
66 (31:15) - Looks to me like the Corsa was already in the roundabout when the flatbed lorry driver entered the roundabout, couldn't be clearer, flatbed fault.
14:21 Sounds as if someone was taught a well-needed lesson.
So someone makes an innocent mistake and you think it's appropriate they get injured? You are the sort of person who should NEVER have a license.
@@khalidacosta7133 A lesson that may well save her life. Don't be so wet.
32:01 Red van certainly did get CA08 HMD - CAHMD - CAMMED - Dash cam (not a word I know, but still had a chuckle) :)
Can anyone tell me please where abouts clip 57:00 (#115) is at? It looks familiar 🤔
Sign says Royal Liverpool University Hospital.
#16 has be cackling! He sounds more embarrassed at being caught singing than the near miss (which was his fault for going too fast towards a blind corner)
#82 Yes the HGV should not have done it, but wher were the cammers brain cells. Safer to use your brakes to get yourself out of trouble, instead of the horn in the hope that the HGV will let you past.
40:10 those jamaican mate lol🤣 50:33 you got him angry mon
At 1:36, I wouldn't have tried to undertake that van, to me it always looked like he was going to cut you up, not your fault but an accident could have happened and you could have easily avoided it.
It was his fault for undertaking its a dangerous driving offence😁😁
@@sonnyday6210 Passing on the left approaching traffic lights, is not classed as undertaking, it is passing and the van driver was not indicating to change lanes, he obviously did not check his mirrors. Undertaking is not an offence, there is no law against it, it can be classed as dangerous or careless driving but that depends on when the undertake was done.
At 1:32, he's driving recklessly why would you drive alongside?
At 2:51 indicates right, then swings out on the left with no indicators. Cam driver at fault.
On a main road you are supposed to keep as much open space for oncoming traffic if you have to cross. I could hear an indicator. And wether or not he was indicating or not, he wasn't moving, so traffic from behind should come to a stop as well.
31:05 I love the way he rolls his Rs
At 31:26 as the car entered the roundabout it was clear to do so had it gone left or right but, it did a U which makes the Transit at fault as..the vehicle turning down the road to the Transit Driver's Left was clearly on the roundabout before the Transit arrived & as Give way to the right, is the rule, the car was on the Transit's right seconds before the accident..or unwritten rule of the road...Always expect the Unexpected !!
5:20 baby in a pram with no adult to be seen crazy
Why on earth was there just a random baby in a pushchair at 5:25?
I had the same thought
It used to be custom that if you had a baby and didn't want it that you'd leave it outside the church to be discovered - hence the term "Foundling Child"
@@Trek001 outside the church door, not on the pavement no where near the building.
#11 when was this filmed? Mobile phone from the 90s lol
2:30 RIP Steve Wright...
At 11:32, we should all have a bit more consideration for the drivers of large vehicles, if they don`t take the opportunity when it is there they could sit there for ages before anyone will let them onto the roundabout.
Another fantastic video u look like u really enjoying yourself ❤
bot account right here o/
109 where exactly where you going to squeeze in infront of that lorry?
#6 I could swear that this is from the year 2000!
#66 The Corsa, yes he was on the roundabout & probably indicating right but that was to tell other motorists that he was turning right not doing a U-turn.
In Australia you are supposed to give way to the Vehicle ON the Roundabout. But most giveway to vehicles on the Right obviously they are already on the roundabout.
At 8:39, that was a perfectly safe pass, it may not have been the full one and a half metres but it is not always easy to achieve that, as long as it is not at speed and safe, what does it matter?
The truck turning left video. I remember my driving instructor testing me several times on lorries swinging right to turn left. Car was an idiot.
Pretty sure at least 50% of issues can be removed if people stop undertaking or overtaking at pace on roundabouts.
5:18 LOL who’s baby is that 😂
It's a new cash strapped council traffic calming scheme. To be fair they did give him/her/they/them/it a lollipop.
That idiot on the phone #54 talk about panicking rabbit in the headlights LMAO!
The tool on the bike thinking he is some vigilante good not have complained if he got a slap. I think every driver has had a cheeky look at the phone in stationary traffic including the police.
@@kevinbrown9521uhh… no? It’s incredibly dangerous, and avoidable fatalities are caused by distracted driving. The law is super strict for a reason
How many fatalities have you know personally someone having a look at there phone in STATIONARY traffic me equals none.
The most it’s caused in my 35 years of driving is holding traffic up. I’m not on about driving using the phone I’m on about sitting still using the phone.
@@kevinbrown9521the guy was literally on video using the phone before coming to a stop. What if there was a biker waiting in the queue? He could have just driven right over them. All you’re doing here mate is outing your own illegal and stupid behaviour
#53 Weeee! Think you need a front weight on that there John Deere bud.
also that bike on the right in the bike bit looks a bit big.......................
@ 43:24 the reactions of a slug.
#108 good advert for Stephen Lawrence Ltd
#75 You ARE allowed to enter a yellow box-junction if your exit is blocked by oncoming traffic.
Highway Code rule 174
In this case, the yellow box is only on one side of the road and intended to keep the side closest to camera clear of traffic.
The part of the rule you cite is when the yellow box covers both sides of the road and you cannot complete a right turn due to oncoming traffic or other right turning vehicles in front of you. There's a diagram on the website showing this more clearly.
It does not state you can turn right against oncoming traffic then stop causing that traffic to take evasive measures (or not in this case) because a bike stopped half out of their junction and started dithering.
The bike, the car, and the pick-up all had a hand in this one and I would say not one was fully to blame. For want of a nail and all that.
Video 19 - that black Astra I think, was travelling well over the limit.
At 3:23, the word is LOSE control, not LOOSE control, loose means not tight.
9:22 Woooooooh!!! 🤣
#41 As soon as that car started doing laps it was obvious what they were up to... shocked the boys didn't notice!
#5 why were you trying to overtake a van on a roundabout?
Did anyone else notice the baby on their own in a buggy in #13?!!
5:50 Why does the law allow ridiculously wide agri vehicles on the roads?
No escort, no special training required and the arrogance to block the roads.
If it doesn't fit in half the width of the road it should have a wide load escort.
Most agricultural vehicles travel no more than a mile or two between locations. Farmer probably lives in that village and has only one route between fields. How much do you think food would cost if they had to pay for escort vehicles?
22:11 I I kept you waitin', I would describe my performance on this episode as gdoxjsgwisocpgktbeuwoshhjdpshxidpsnwueixgixpswhsukwdb
4:47 blue light nutters, they have to slow down and LOOK to see if it is safe
13... Is that baby just by itself in the pushchair?
#51 Very impressive stop.
I swear the driver in #52 is Cain Dingle
43:45 #91 cammer clearly in the wrong
5:15.. anyone else see a baby in a pushchair, alone on the pavement on the left with no adults or parents anywhere in sight.. wtf!
That cyclist who thinks he is always right is exactly why they should be licensed and insured. I doubt he could pass any test. Maybe when a cyclist gets a dash cam they drive like dorks or maybe only dork cyclists get dash cams.
I’ll be more of concerned of the baby in the pram left unattended @ 5:18..🤔
It was only for an hour whilst I plated candy crush, what's the problem?
I like how everyone is more concerned about the baby than the harvester choosing a bad village route to the farm. They may yet be some hope for humanity. That being said, it used to be very normal to leave children in pushchairs outside shops etc... I believe this is how my great aunt almost lost track of a child (she forgot how many children she had at the time)
free toddler (+ free buggy) at 5:18 if anyone wants it
These cyclists who think they are the police can be really annoying.
Where’s the kids mum 5:15?????
35:34 the car shouldn't have let the cyclist go as it says give way on the floor for the cyclist.
The scariest were #17 & #18 - deliberately taking risks with other people's lives.
#5 cammer is the idiot here for trying to undertake!
#107 Open top Merc, wearing a hi-viz ! Class ???
#98 wasnt indicating. You can hear him turn it on right before the crash.
#110 Mini driver was well in front of the Enterprise van prior to it trying to merge, the van should have given way as the mini was using the full length of the slip road to merge into the slow traffic ( undue care & attention) but the van decided he wasn't going to let him & guess what an accident but guess what that was the Mini's fault for failing to stop in time cause he was annoyed at the van driver.
Funny how BG65 EBC is taxed till June 24 but has not had MOT since November 22, No Insurance then either me thinks. Most of the Reg's checked have No Tax or MOT or both. Also AO59 PPZ no MOT or Tax, might explain why he ran??
Wow you are thorough. are you a cop or do you need to get out a bit more? (just kidding)
@Cookie6240 just a little nosey woman 🤣
@@lucyh9260 You can tax (ved) a vehicle without MOT if you have monthly payments, my car has not had an MOT since it was due in January but I can still get the VED due to monthly DD payments
55# Sometimes it's better not to put yourself in danger by riding right next to a dangerous phone user. You could have startled him enough to swerve into you. Please be safe.
77# when a tesla driver says someones went fast past them it's saying something but when it's on roads 1.5 size of a lane it's get rid of license stuff
My grandad was hit by and unmarked police car in a similar situation and they denied responsibility
#105 Actually it's IMPATIENT TRACTOR DRIVER who couldn't be bothered to slow down enough so the car driver who was already passing several cars heading for a suitable gap to pass to get to that gap.
#33, there should be a compulsory set of road standards for cyclist's before they are even allowed on the road, Insurance or some form of damage cover should be compulsory for bicycles as well. you ARE supposed to dismount a bike to cross a road even at a crossing.
what is this person driving / riding in 1st video? seen him multiple times.. uncertain if they're just a troll as they keep finding themselves in bad situations!
You just got to hope, #46, gets prosecuted. That's horrendous driving.
71 Bus doing that in front of a learner should loose his job if not his license for a while.
the mini was at fault
The police should hire the cyclist dude. All day on the road police officer on a bike.
Some people have zero defensive skills. Why would you start to undertake someone on a roundabout.
#13 tractor and equipment is not road legal
#110 Poor van driving, but the Mini was much worse.
39.40 - that was your fault - nothing worse than someone joining the motorway and then speeding up like a twerp - the lorry was doing what he should and that was to move to the left lane.
1 hour video is far too long. It becomes boring watching the same near misses/ occasional hits and I lose interest. 20-25 minutes twice as often please.
you know you can pause it and come back to it later?
You've already seen these videos in shorter compilations throughout the month. You're either senile or a goldfish.
Disagree
He(she) is to stupid to find the pause button 😁😁👍👍
it’s best of the month?? they do separate normal shorter videos
#75 the car wasn't at fault the cyclist clearly had a stop m/give way marking on the cycle lane.
How about blurring the reg plates of innocent drivers on these clips? You make it easy for criminals who clone plates by showing every car registration they come across
Knowing a number plate is really quite harmless.
Clip 13
Shouldn’t be taking equipment that doesn’t fit down there without someone to spot through tight gaps really
Every video we see the SAME on SAME things, so I guess something is wrong with the driving test? A vehicle driven badly is effectively a WEAPON.
Most of these videos are just ones that have been done before so why make an hour up of them
At 1:34 ... should've just kept the distance , driving in a staggered formation where possible is much safer
Some people just have a death wish it seems.
#58 Sh*ting Peugeot
Ofcourse no 5 is a foreigner driving like a nutter
#56 complaining about someone else whilst pulling off from being parked on double yellows. you can't write this stuff
I think all sub-standard drivers should be forced to re-take the driving test until they get it right.. and if they can`t they should be banned for life! Remember patience is a superpower!
But they did take a test till they got it right. What'll happen is they'll take the test and go back to sub-standard driving. Like they done after the first test