Good afternoon! The test is good! There are very few comparisons of these devices. But I would like to see a test in the ground. I read the comments and answers below, and the soils are different in their complexity, but still it would be correct to supplement the air test.
Wow thank you , great video. It has Finally helped me decide Which one I’m going to get. Except for maybe the equinox 900 now. Curious to know if you still stand behind this after time has passed. I’m gonna like and subscribe. Your friend from Montana Kyle
Cheers thanks heaps and glad you liked the video! Yes I would still stand by what I said, sometimes I still take the gold monster out for a bit of fun but would still pick the nox. Thanks for watching and cheers for the sub
20kHz is the least sensitive of the gold frequencies on the Nox, 40kHz will pick up small gold much better, 20kHz will give a bit of extra depth on bigger gold. Overall in most instances you're better off using Multi and only dropping back to 20 or 40 if EMI is an issue. Multi will handle bad ground better than the single frequencies too.
Yeah I actually didn't realise that when testing didn't know so much about the frequencys was running on 20 as it was so much smoother in my area, so probably a fair test, but in future Multi is probably best.
@@TheSluicers yea, the multi was probably getting too much EMI, 40 would have been the better choice if it wasn't so bad with EMI, the higher the frequency the more sensitive to small gold. You're doing well with the videos, not an easy task to make videos.
I THINK YOU NEED TO REDO THE TEST BY PUT IN THE DIRT THAT YOU TOOK OUT OF THOSE HOLES IN THE PLASTIC BAGS THAT YOU CAN EASILY LIFT UP AND PUT THE TARGET UNDER SO IT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE DIRT NOT JUST THE AIR DISTANCE DAVID ADAM GRENIS MAPLETON AVENUE BOULDER COLORADO USA
An air test is far more accurate as soil will vary a lot more from different soil when air is a solid baseline test as there is nothing else interfering.
It does but only to the point of telling you iron or non iron, which on small gold is still hard to tell, the equinox has a lot more you can tell from it.
Unless you put the dirt on top of the gold your test don’t mean squat , you could have done this useless test using a ruler and saved yourself digging holes 😂
Both detectors use similar frequency’s and the same technology so will respond to different dirt the same anyway, and it’s much more accurate doing an air test then a backyard dirt soil test as ground will vary an insane amount and air is a much better baseline, also using a ruler the targets would have not been in the same positions relative to the coil and would be much harder to have an exact line to swing over.
As you can see by the tests they are neck and neck, almost impossible to tell a difference, due to the equinox audio boosting it’s actually easier to here the faint targets on the Nox. So it’s a real neck and neck on the sensitivity
It’s amazing how sensitive both detectors are!!!thanks for sharing⛏🏴
Yeah they are both great detectors especially for small gold! Thanks for watching
Nicely done, and a solid, evenhanded assessment of both machines. Concurr totally with your takeways.
Thanks a lot bro, glad you enjoyed the video and came to the same conclusion :)!
Great video and commentry,was impressed by the equinox.
Thanks for info.
Nice, thanks
Good afternoon! The test is good! There are very few comparisons of these devices. But I would like to see a test in the ground. I read the comments and answers below, and the soils are different in their complexity, but still it would be correct to supplement the air test.
Wow thank you , great video. It has Finally helped me decide Which one I’m going to get. Except for maybe the equinox 900 now. Curious to know if you still stand behind this after time has passed. I’m gonna like and subscribe. Your friend from Montana Kyle
Cheers thanks heaps and glad you liked the video! Yes I would still stand by what I said, sometimes I still take the gold monster out for a bit of fun but would still pick the nox. Thanks for watching and cheers for the sub
Liked, shared and commented
The frequency for the gold monster is 45
And the equinox high is 5,10,20,40
20kHz is the least sensitive of the gold frequencies on the Nox, 40kHz will pick up small gold much better, 20kHz will give a bit of extra depth on bigger gold. Overall in most instances you're better off using Multi and only dropping back to 20 or 40 if EMI is an issue. Multi will handle bad ground better than the single frequencies too.
Yeah I actually didn't realise that when testing didn't know so much about the frequencys was running on 20 as it was so much smoother in my area, so probably a fair test, but in future Multi is probably best.
@@TheSluicers yea, the multi was probably getting too much EMI, 40 would have been the better choice if it wasn't so bad with EMI, the higher the frequency the more sensitive to small gold. You're doing well with the videos, not an easy task to make videos.
Which model very best for you bro?
Probably the Equinox if I had to pick oke
Equinox - you can search in the water, Gold Monster- you can't search in the water.
Definitely that alone is a big perk on the Equinox
I THINK YOU NEED TO REDO THE TEST BY PUT IN THE DIRT THAT YOU TOOK OUT OF THOSE HOLES IN THE PLASTIC BAGS THAT YOU CAN EASILY LIFT UP AND PUT THE TARGET UNDER SO IT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE DIRT NOT JUST THE AIR DISTANCE
DAVID ADAM GRENIS MAPLETON AVENUE BOULDER COLORADO USA
An air test is far more accurate as soil will vary a lot more from different soil when air is a solid baseline test as there is nothing else interfering.
why don't you wave the gold flake over the detector more
The monster does have discrimation
It does but only to the point of telling you iron or non iron, which on small gold is still hard to tell, the equinox has a lot more you can tell from it.
Unless you put the dirt on top of the gold your test don’t mean squat , you could have done this useless test using a ruler and saved yourself digging holes 😂
Both detectors use similar frequency’s and the same technology so will respond to different dirt the same anyway, and it’s much more accurate doing an air test then a backyard dirt soil test as ground will vary an insane amount and air is a much better baseline, also using a ruler the targets would have not been in the same positions relative to the coil and would be much harder to have an exact line to swing over.
Gold monster its more..
As you can see by the tests they are neck and neck, almost impossible to tell a difference, due to the equinox audio boosting it’s actually easier to here the faint targets on the Nox. So it’s a real neck and neck on the sensitivity
What seting on the monster