Geography lesson in a German school. Teacher-Children, what is the largest city in the world? The boy gets up and answers-Stalingrad! Teacher??? The boy-my grandfather told Me that they walked along the same street for six months, but never reached the end.
Me: Chongqing in China is the largest city in world by Size with 30,165,500 Kilometers of territory controlled. Largest City by population is Tokyo, Japan with over 38 Million people.
Unfortunately, USSR forced its soldiers to rush enemy positions. It was later on they realized that pouring more men on enemy positions didn't seem to work
Beasty Gamer 'If we have more people than they have ammo, then we win' Edit: this is a joke, but it kinda ties into Rommels phrase: "The man that has one more round in his gun shall win." or smth like that
This looks neat! Love how they accurately recreated Panzer III's and IV's. Way better than those 'Tigers' from Saving private Ryan, as much as I love that film
"Twenty-eight Panfilov" - a historical feature film about the legendary feat of Soviet soldiers in the defense of Moscow in 1941. However, the tanks on the screen were not real. To naturalistically show the German Panzerkampfwagen III, the Directors bought conventional radio-controlled models, "protyuningovali" their specially manufactured parts and conducted pavilion shooting.
I enjoy war movies of different countries. One Russian war film I enjoyed is "9th Company". I think these films deserve to be shown around the world. Thanks for the video.
Russian made A Soldier's Story Hollywood made All's Quiet on the western front ,Lawrence of Arabia and Zulu German made Das Boot are all realistic .We were Soldiers deserves a mention.
@@tightywhitey6466 Then you know nothing about history, like the fact that many Bolsheviks were Jews. And oh, saying Russian history and revisionism it's like saying water is wet and ice damn cold.
"fought like that" he says... took russia 20m corpses to figure out they should not just send men at the enemy and supply their soldiers with anti armor didnt it?
you are all so stupid omg loool. offencive is always at least 10 times more losses than defence. 20 millions is total. nazi pigs killed eveybody they came across. losses among soldiers wer germans 5-6 mllions, russians 7-8. how can one be so moronly ignorant?
I think this video is not realistic if you think on the whole Second World War because the Russians lost much more soldiers, tanks and warplanes like the Germans! Both countries were destroyed after the war!
The two guys with the anti-tank rifle are cool. After a couple of well-aimed shots, they get to displace before the Germans can zero them in because they're not tied down to an artillery emplacement. They're like mortar men, but more accurate.
According to the historian Isaev some tanks had more than a dozen hits but he remained in the ranks. After all, it's just a large-caliber cartridge.. And we must manage to hit a vulnerable spot in the tank.
316-ая стрелковая дивизия генерал-майора Ивана Васильевича Панфилова. Сформирована в Казахстане городе Алматы. Только из добровольцев. Добровольцев! Казахов, русских, украинцев, киргизов, уйгуров... После гибели генерала Панфилова И.В. (присвоено звание Героя Советского Союза, посмертно) дивизия переименована в 8-ую ГВАРДЕЙСКУЮ ПАНФИЛОВСКУЮ дивизию!
They have to make more films about the eastern front of Ww2. I'm really tired of this Hollywood american hero shit like 'fury'. The eastern front was much more brutal and more interesting than the western front. 75% of the german army and their best men were fighting against the russians, who fought with all they have while on the western front allies fought often against teens and old men. But yea americans are the 'heros' of ww2. They stopped hitler alone according to hollywood.
Урок географии в немецкой школе.Учитель-,,Дети,какой самый большой город в мире?,,Встает мальчик-,,Сталинград!,,Учитель-???!!!Мальчик-,,Мне дедушка говорил,что они полгода по одной улице шли ,но так до конца и не дошли,,
Братцы Мы должны быт в месте Мы значить страны Снг казахи украйнцы белорусы киргизы таджики узбеки и русские нам делить нечего нашы деды нам отстояли это победу и страну землью ....
Kanat Rozakov да сделали страну понамешали религии традиции, некоторое отношение одного менталитета к другому вызывает агресию, из за этого людей обеденили понятиями как на зоне, из за этого всегда будет корупция и безответственое воспитание, страны СНГ скоро будут жить хуже чем отсталая африка вот что такое ссср обречен на жалкое существование
I don't really care if this movie is 100% accurate or 100% propaganda, it was still visually exciting depicting a battle between Soviets and Germans in WW 2. I "know" it's a movie and not a real battle. In a real war things happen that aren't supposed to, and things don't happen that should happen. It is the vagaries and chance effects of reality.
It was a real hardest war in 4 years long, and lots of hard battles, heroic feats! Simple people who went to this regiment volunteers, understood that depends on them, whether the enemy will break to the capital. If they fail their comrades, which the Panzer corps, the Germans will go into the flank. Nowhere to retreat - behind Moscow. So you can talk about movies about Batman or marvel comics, what could or could not be there. But in the war that occurred, these events are not subject to doubt. Just as you will not come to doubt the reality of "Day D", for example. Or Pearl Harbor. more about the historical context and filming en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panfilov%27s_28_Men
@@TitovIgorBro Здесь это обсуждать неуместно! "При этом сам факт тяжёлых оборонительных боёв 316-й стрелковой дивизии против 2-й и 11-й немецких танковых дивизий (прим. численность личного состава немецких дивизий значительно превосходила советскую) на Волоколамском направлении 16 ноября 1941 года и проявленный при этом бойцами дивизии героизм не оспаривался"
American's movies about WW2:"Awesome!" , "That's how we kick back Nazis! ",...and no arguments about its realness. Russian's movies with the same subject : *PROPAGANDA*
The main burden of the war with the Nazis in 1941-1945 fell to the Russian army. Americans and the British only in 1944 decided to enter the battlefield and entered into direct battles with the Nazis. They did it for one reason only, that the Russian army could liberate Europe without them. In this case, they could not count on the laurels of the winners. This is the real participation of Americans in the second world war. And it is not very significant. You may not believe it, but that's the military history of the 20th century.
@@ralfweber4346 It is necessary to distinguish between the movie about the war and the facts of military history. In feature films the Director would not be to thoroughly reproduce some event. Everyday life is boring and this movie will not watch the audience. Therefore, the Director thinks out the events. So, the movie "Fury" and other war movies it is only the interpretation on the second world war. Those who are looking for accurate information about the war should not go to the movies and to a Museum or archive.
@@gridfilm9551 True! But Stalin gladly let them join the fight to lessen the casualty the Soviet had paid too much for its cause.Guess Power corrupted him and turned him into second Hitler with the obsession of absolute control.
the gunners were in prepared positions, ready with direct fire guns. Sighting a howitzer in this video is not shown in the start that they were fired from a distance. Then were forced to retreat as they went up the German planes. After the position of anti-tank artillery was known, a second wave of artillery preparation the Germans she was swept away, there was one gun. Which was also suppressed by tank fire. So everything is realistic.
This is footage from the film "28-m Panfilov warriors." They're Russian Spartans. In November 1941, the division of Russian General Panfilov was at the forefront of the Nazi troops ' strike on the capital of Russia - Moscow. Panfilov's soldiers became a stone wall that the Nazis could not penetrate. Part of the front where stood the soldiers of the Panfilov heroes, the Nazis are unable to move forward nor to one meter. These soldiers were true heroes not only for Russia , but for all who in those years fought with fascists the US, Britain, France and other countries. Panfilov's feat of war is an example of how to fight an enemy that seeks to enslave your homeland. Eternal memory to the soldiers of General Panfilov!
This never happened. This may as well be the Russian equivalent of saving private ryan only that this story is a hisotrical Myth that was utlizied by Stalin for propaganda purposes and was propagated for years before being exposed as never happened. www.pri.org/stories/2016-10-15/russia-chooses-myth-over-history-new-wwii-movie
I recommend a book "10 Myths of the 2nd World War " by Aleksiej Isajew and a view on this particular case,its a legend and propaganda's masterpice to raise the morale in 41 when Soviets were retreating all the way, every nation has one and this is the one
@@MrBielsoN Information about the battle of Panfilov near Moscow first appeared in Newspapers in 1942. There was a war and without propaganda was not (maybe exaggerated by the number of destroyed tanks). In modern times, the press was discussing the number of Nazi tanks that were burned by Panfilov's soldiers. Someone it looked that with tanks exaggerated. Someone with these do not agree. This and other details can be argued for a long time. Indisputable is the fact that Panfilov's Division was the bravest division of the red army. They were like Rangers. They couldn't be defeated. By the way, most of them were Kazakhs and Kyrgyz by nationality. They are descendants of the great Genghis Khan. The defence sector was where the soldiers of the Panfilov was the main direction of attack of the Nazis. Panfilov fighters withstood this blow and did not let the Germans to Moscow. This is a historical fact.
@WTW 142 I have no doubt that the Germans have great strategists but I think in this case they probably didn't think too much on it as they thought the fight would be over in a little skirmish.
Awesome cinematography! The dude (Mongolian?) with the BFG demonstrated the fear a high caliber weapon can bring to the battlefield. I’d really liked it better to have some CC’ing to understand them. Good job.🙂
I give the Russian army a lot of respect for how bad of a beating they took in the beginning of the war with Germans and how bad they were pushed back they held there ground. It took them awhile to muster up enough soldiers and equipment to bring on a counter attack which was able to push the Germans back and the Germans never recovering from it.
@Im Just One Simple Guy He's partially the reason The Germans got so deep into the USSR. Executed multiple generals a bit before Hitler showed his true colors and went to attack them, which crippled the command structure, also the terrible idea to attack Finland which had hard to navigate terrain and was buried in snow, that lost them resources and manpower which could have been used to help fight the germans.
Game Or Death If he don’t execute them and left those that were so called obedient,then all his troops will just run away from the battle and non of his general will ever listen to him.Your understanding of all of these stratagems are very superficial,lad.
@@youandme6199 like to thank you for your reply. I'm a ex American soldier I served back in the 77 to 89 I have been doing a lot of studying of the second WW and alot on the Russian front I can say when it starts to look bad for your country your country man and woman pulled together and came out on top.
@Im Just One Simple Guy What are you talking about.. Tens of millions of Ukrainians served in the USSR government, the red army etc.. I think you mean the Germans were massacring Ukrainians, Russians, Poles etc..
Guys, this film was made on real events of 1941 near Moscow. A whole armada of "heavily armed" Nazis were stopped by a division from Kazakhstan. Heroic battle 28 soldiers !!! We honor their courage and valor, remember them !!!
Sorry, it is not based on real events, but on the Soviet myth (and current Medinsky's lie) created by the local authorities. Sergei Mironenko, the head of research of the Russian state archives published documents from the Soviet military prosecutor's investigation of this case. Quite indicatively for today's Russia, he lost his job for not demystifying Panfilovstev. This is not about questioning bravery of these people, but about not ashaming their memory with lie. www.rferl.org/a/mironenko-state-archive-chief-removed-from-post-panfilov-legend/27619460.html
@@karelsvoboda7817 It is a historical fact that heavy defensive battles of the 316th rifle division of the Soviet troops against the 2nd tank and 35th infantry divisions of the Wehrmacht on the Volokolamsk area on November 16, 1941. Selected German troops did not go further in the direction of Moscow, where there was only less than 60 km. This is a historical fact !!! And lovers change the story is full. By the way, this Russian scientist was fired from his job.
@@ranvabclc The positions of the 4th group headed by political commander V. Klochkov are subjected to the most massive attacks. Within four hours Panfilov held back tanks and infantry of the enemy. They repelled several attacking enemy and destroyed 18 tanks. These were the most unprecedented feats of the legendary warriors who died the death of the brave. Several people were badly injured. The battle of Dubosekovo went down in history as a feat of 28 Panfilov members. The 28 participants in this battle, who considered everyone dead, were given the title Hero of the Soviet Union.
@@stmstm7219 read the documents. These were not 28 people, etc. Nobody questions the battle, but the story of 28 Panfilovtsev Firing somebody for telling the truth and providing evidence for it is simply a shame. Even Medinsky had to recognize that the story is simply a myth, not the truth.
The positions of the 4th group headed by political commander V. Klochkov are subjected to the most massive attacks. Within four hours Panfilov held back tanks and infantry of the enemy. They repelled several attacking enemy and destroyed 18 tanks. These were the most unprecedented feats of the legendary warriors who died the death of the brave. Several people were badly injured. The battle of Dubosekovo went down in history as a feat of 28 Panfilov members. The 28 participants in this battle, who considered everyone dead, were given the title Hero of the Soviet Union.
It must be remembered that the names are not so important, since the journalist did not have the opportunity to reliably find out the names of the fighters who fought there. Therefore, they recorded 28 names of killed or missing fighters.
Simple,but accurate,game.The old PS2 Panzer Front Ausf. B.You learn to have a healthy respect for anti-tank rifles.Dangerous as heck and a bugger to eliminate.
@@mstegs5477 Disagree, little too much propaganda. Seen another Russian WWII movie and a German gunner with an MG42 shoots into an advancing line of Russian troops and doesn't hit a single one before getting killed. That was an absolute joke.
Kv2 is inaccurate. Takes a shit load of minutes to reload. And its slow too. Kv2’s purpose is to destroy bunkers and trenches not for tank to tank combat
This film maybe is a propaganda idk, but... It shows real situation on Eastern Front in 1941. You know...at that time germans really just rushed like that. (cuz of blitzkrieg) Sometimes successfully, fast and organized (like in Kiev, Minsk and etc.) but sometimes they had to spend waves of their soldiers and tanks just on one well fortified position. (like in Brest or Bobruisk) Most of the time they just cutted thru tanks like T-26, T-50 and BT-5/7 but sometimes they had to fight against T-34 and KV-1 with guns of PZ-2/3... You know this story is about 28 soldiers who were like KV-1 against PZ-3. They held their trenches until they died. They had great rifles like SVT-40's, a lot of grenades, good position and etc.
28 Panfilovs (there were more of them, but they died) from Kazakhstan stopped the main German attack on Moscow. Russia calls it a myth, but the Kazakhs remember everyone who went to the front for the USSR.
Don't be fooled by foreigners. The film is shot in Russia and the money is mainly Russian, collected all over the world! The feat of 28 Panfilov heroes is one of the most famous stories about the war in Russia! What military journalists during the war, a little embellished it, nothing changes. We know what the media is. Truth is important. And this feat will remain in centuries!
They are doing a better job than Fury, but those tanks are still too close together. German doctrine specifies a spacing of about 50 meters between tanks in a platoon.
@@IvanAlejandro99 I've heard that excuse before, and I don't buy it. How many tanks do there really need to be in a single shot? If you want to convey a sense of the scale of the fighting then pull out for a wide shot that shows a full platoon of 4/5 tanks spread out over a couple hundred meters. If you shoot the formation side-on in an open plain you could even get a full company in the shot. Otherwise it would not be too difficult to have intense yet realistic onscreen combat while only showing one or two tanks at a time. I keep hearing creatives making excuses for why realism wouldn't work for their material. But every time I hear that I can't help but remember that the most realistic games and movies are by far the best ones. Those that really have a passion for the history can usually make realism work just fine within a compelling and dramatic story. Those that make excuses for why it wouldn't work are too prideful to admit that they just didn't know any better, and either lack the creativity to break out of the mindset of "how it's always been done" or are too lazy to try. Ultimately realism has no substantive impact on the drama of a story. But for those of us that know what things should look like a lack of realism can pull us out of the story, and remind us that we are watching a movie at a time when we should instead be completely immersed. Plus realism just shows us that the creative team took pride in representing a period of history. And that's always nice to see.
2 раза казахи защищали Москву от Банапарта и Гитлера, а об этом Россия всячески умалчивает, наши герои лётчица, снайпераша, пулимётчица, танкистки, полководца Кошкарбаев первый возразил флаг над рейхстага, казахи тюрки сильный народ.
this scene is not anything about the Battle of Kursk. This is the story of a Rifle Regiment sent out to the outskirts to meet the German attack on Moscow.
@@ralfweber4346 I'm aware that some historians have recently dug out archived documents showing that the Russian war correspondent who filed the news report on the last 28 men of Panfilov's company had brushed up his version of their defense of Moscow against a mighty German attack. But the verdict on it is not yet final. There are still many Muskovites who believed that even if the brushed up part is taken out, enough will remain as to merit honoring Panfilov's 28. So much so that these same people contributed money to underwrite the production of the movie in time for the 70th anniversary of the defense of Moscow.
Since Syria and Iraq conflicts started, more and more people are watching these kind of war videos. World wants another big war to restart the slowing economies.
This is "Panfilov's 28", not a bad Russian WW II movie, if you like this sort of film. It runs for two hours, this is just a short clip from the second half.
This film was called "28 Panfilov", this is a famous Soviet legend, based, however, on very real events. These heroes were called "Panfilov" by the name of the commander of the 316th division, General Ivan Panfilov (3 days after the events of the film, he was killed by a shell fragment at his command post). When I watched the film in 2016, I was surprised that the general himself was never mentioned in the film.
In the original movie, the soviets made a decoy trench ahead of the their actual trenches. This caused the Germans to barrage it with artillery, however since these were decoys, all of the Soviet soldiers were alive. Then the soviets let the Germans come closer, to make them think that the artillery had done its job.
This is a movie not the real thing. One of the real combats the Russians did was flushing out the Germans from tanks! The Russians also rushed to the Germans with their tanks at point blank and opened fired!
I think Stugs/pz4/panthers n tigers more likely than panzer threes but depends.. Certainly the Germans realised the panzer three was outdated after the first few years...that's not to say they didn't use them as sometimes you had to use what you had...
There were NO Tigers or Panthers in 1941. And there were only earlier versions of Pz III/IV and Stugs with 30-50mm armour at that time. Actually, this time German Panzerwaffe were armed worse than Red Army's tank units but they had an anvantage in experience, training and tactics, that's why the Red Army suffered such heavy losses in 1941 and allowed the Germans to go so far.
I found a Russian WWII film a long time ago but i forget it's name now but it seemed to be in black and white with a brown shade instead of traditional black and white and there's a scene with Soviet Soldiers walking across shallow waters and trying to get organized while most of their Armored Vehicles have been flipped over, anyone know what film this is?
Lights on after dark? That's a BIG no no... and firing one of those 20mm (I think that's the correct caliber) anti-vehicle rifles can't have been very pleasant.
This is PTRD rifle, can penetrate armor near 40mm. Soviet soldiers used it for side/rear attack. Sometimes they shoot to the weakly armored places in front projection
loampey1 ptrd could penetrate pz-2/3 easily, there is a lot of places in the front of the tank, for example viewing instruments, commander towers. Tracks was also weak place of the tanks.
Soviets didn’t use 20 mm. They used 14,5mm PTRS and PTRD ant tank rifles what use 14,5x114 ammo what has energy two times bigger than .50 cal or .50 BMG (12,7x99)
@@zepter00 I see, it was effective against panzer 2 and panzer 1 perhaps SKZ255 halftrack. Not sure even 3 is struggling. Its very difficult to take out panzer3..the sheels is not strong enough to go thru ..but according to history, these brave soldiers has to punch thru at close range to penertae 20mm or top 15mm steel plates. However, later german had space armour introduced, and this makes the anti rifle entirely useless.
John Mar early Panzer 3 and Panzer 4 were taken out by Polish anti tank rifle Ur wz 35 caliber 7,92mm (cartridge 7,92x107 DS). It is nothing for 14,5 mm x114 AP or API. It can deafet 32-33 mm RHA at 500 meters. 35-40 mm RHA at 100 meters
John Mar 37mm Bofors anti tank gun was designed before war. It is not about caliber,..it is about muzzle velocity and material what penetrator was made. Shoter of anti tank rifles had good result engaging even heavier tank at front shoting at tracks, commanders uppolas, periscope, visiors, Panzer 3 could be engaded at whole frontal armour surface
Interesting how in russian movies they are always "desperate" but, at the end, they manage to easily kill 10 panzer with just one molotov bottle! ( By the way, germans did not use their panzer to protect infantry and for sure they werent used to run them at just 10 Km/h, as you can see here! )
How fast do you think WW2 tanks could go...across deep snow, without damaging their transmission. This is pretty accurate to how Infantry and armor would work in tandem. Perhaps the Germans would have half tracks to help the infantry drive up, but considering the lack of mechanization in the Wermacht, this is a plausible scenario? Also if advancing across open ground, the infantry would be in support of the tanks and thus behind the armor. until they could fan out and attack the trench, it is not out of the question that they would have Armor protecting the infantry. Finally, the Soviets have Zis anti tank guns and PTSDs at close range. Both of which were easily capable of knocking out a PZIV at the range depicted. I do agree these movies are often leaning towards the Russian, but in this scene, not much out of the ordinary is happening. The germans attack a trench, get flanked lose 3 to 4 tanks, 20/30 men. Withdraw in good order.
Geography lesson in a German school. Teacher-Children, what is the largest city in the world? The boy gets up and answers-Stalingrad! Teacher??? The boy-my grandfather told Me that they walked along the same street for six months, but never reached the end.
You simply nailed it, will definitely remember the answer when somebody asks me for it.
that hits
In Germany you would expelled as a Teacher to ever ask that kind of question. As a child aswell ^^
Me: Chongqing in China is the largest city in world by Size with 30,165,500 Kilometers of territory controlled.
Largest City by population is Tokyo, Japan with over 38 Million people.
I dont get it
Artillery that actually showing it recoiling, German Tanks legit to the time period. What is this sorcery?
1/6 scale tanks
@@raseli4066 Now that you say that, I swear this was featured in a video about ingenious special effects.
@@AshlandMan well they filmed green mockup vehicles as tanks and then they edited in the 1/6 scale tanks
Power of RC tonk
I think this is the movie that the people who made war thunder helped make
Ah, yes, finally a well-directed scene where the Soviets don't actually run at the Germans and play tactically.
Love it.
Unfortunately, USSR forced its soldiers to rush enemy positions. It was later on they realized that pouring more men on enemy positions didn't seem to work
UURRAA
Beasty Gamer
'If we have more people than they have ammo, then we win'
Edit: this is a joke, but it kinda ties into Rommels phrase: "The man that has one more round in his gun shall win." or smth like that
@@beastygamer7718 In Bagration, they did it, and it worked, against the horribly thin German front line and dwindling Panzer reserves.
@@beastygamer7718 to be fair it did work occasionally
Wow its a miracle the camera man survived this war and managed to upload the vid
Obviously it wasn’t uploaded by him unless this channel belongs to a 90 year old
r/whoosh
In war lm staying behind the camera man.
Or play posseum.
😂😂😂😂
This looks neat! Love how they accurately recreated Panzer III's and IV's. Way better than those 'Tigers' from Saving private Ryan, as much as I love that film
"Twenty-eight Panfilov" - a historical feature film about the legendary feat of Soviet soldiers in the defense of Moscow in 1941.
However, the tanks on the screen were not real. To naturalistically show the German Panzerkampfwagen III, the Directors bought conventional radio-controlled models, "protyuningovali" their specially manufactured parts and conducted pavilion shooting.
this is a film 28 Panfilov’s great war film about how the russians fought during World War II
Rest in Peace to all soldiers who served with courage for their families and friends.
I enjoy war movies of different countries. One Russian war film I enjoyed is "9th Company". I think these films deserve to be shown around the world. Thanks for the video.
I agree. I feel the same way. Tired of Jewish revisionist history.
They put hollywood trash on TV instead of great movies
Russian made A Soldier's Story Hollywood made All's Quiet on the western front ,Lawrence of Arabia and Zulu
German made Das Boot are all realistic .We were Soldiers deserves a mention.
Do you have the link of that movie?
@@tightywhitey6466 Then you know nothing about history, like the fact that many Bolsheviks were Jews. And oh, saying Russian history and revisionism it's like saying water is wet and ice damn cold.
When I see Panzer III outside : That thing is a really smoll tank.
When I see Panzer III inside : Roomier than my appartment!
Кажется они все сгорели ?
Damn, soviet army is totally badass
Russians have only resources, not more ..
Nice reconstitution with realistic tanks (Panzer III and IV) and guns (57mm ZiS 2 and PTRD 41).
Sorry, it isn’t a 57mm ZiS 2 but a 45mm M1937 (53-K) of course.
they are actually RC models. I saw a bts of this an its amazing how they manage to turn these small rc tanks to look like a real one.
Same size as real ones ? Fantastic job !
@@methodeetrigueur1164 ofcourse its not real 1:1 size. Its much smaller but thanks to movie magic and green/blue screen they manage to do so.
@@thitran1362 I'd love to see what you did. Do you have a link? :)
If German fought like that in WW2, the war would end in 1939
True propaganda
They were cold, tired and undersupplied after walking such a long way.
"fought like that" he says... took russia 20m corpses to figure out they should not just send men at the enemy and supply their soldiers with anti armor didnt it?
you are all so stupid omg loool. offencive is always at least 10 times more losses than defence. 20 millions is total. nazi pigs killed eveybody they came across. losses among soldiers wer germans 5-6 mllions, russians 7-8. how can one be so moronly ignorant?
This battle happened in real life. These 28 men destroyed 18 german tanks in 4 hours.
I was impressed with this movies special effects. Many of the panzer battle scenes were made using 1/16 scale RC tanks.
Welcome to Warthunder
GKMGinger A.K.A Ginger I cant say for sure were they the pz 3 j s or l
That Thunder It would think it is JS due to the short barrel, L’s had longer barrels for greater accuracy
Mean J
I think this video is not realistic if you think on the whole Second World War because the Russians lost much more soldiers, tanks and warplanes like the Germans! Both countries were destroyed after the war!
I like how for once we see the Germans actually using Panzer III and IV tanks as opposed to the Hollywood movies where every German tank is a Tiger.
CGI
@@mathewm7136 Actually the tanks you see in this are 1/16 scale radio-control.
And they blow up like they've contained gas for years xd
The two guys with the anti-tank rifle are cool. After a couple of well-aimed shots, they get to displace before the Germans can zero them in because they're not tied down to an artillery emplacement. They're like mortar men, but more accurate.
I am not sure how accurate it is for an anti tank rifle to take out a track though.
According to the historian Isaev some tanks had more than a dozen hits but he remained in the ranks. After all, it's just a large-caliber cartridge.. And we must manage to hit a vulnerable spot in the tank.
@@garywheeler7039 that's probably the only use an anti tank rifle had against anything better than a Panzer 2
PTDR Boys Anti-Tank Rifle. They were also used in Sniper roles, highly accurate.
@@_Abjuranax_ the Boys rifle is the british one yes?
316-ая стрелковая дивизия генерал-майора Ивана Васильевича Панфилова. Сформирована в Казахстане городе Алматы. Только из добровольцев. Добровольцев! Казахов, русских, украинцев, киргизов, уйгуров... После гибели генерала Панфилова И.В. (присвоено звание Героя Советского Союза, посмертно) дивизия переименована в 8-ую ГВАРДЕЙСКУЮ ПАНФИЛОВСКУЮ дивизию!
Eternal Glory!
They have to make more films about the eastern front of Ww2.
I'm really tired of this Hollywood american hero shit like 'fury'.
The eastern front was much more brutal and more interesting than the western front. 75% of the german army and their best men were fighting against the russians, who fought with all they have while on the western front allies fought often against teens and old men. But yea americans are the 'heros' of ww2. They stopped hitler alone according to hollywood.
What do you mean american hero shit? What do you mean by ''hero'' ?
Russia needes the help
@@pxu_190 how your mom before the fuck
@@MegaLVgamer hero shit
Lmao sad lil man
28 men, such a good movie
Movie called Panfilov's 28 Men. Battle hardened Guards Rifle Division with anti-tank rifles and 45mm anti-tank guns.
Yup
Ik
One of my favorite films
Saw that, great movie. We have crap movies like 'Fury'.....yikes....
Thank you for the title name. I was wondering what it was.
This based on a real story
Yes, Eastern front of ww2 was the deadliest front of the war, claiming well over 30 million lives, mostly Soviet
I found this channel by accident, but I'm glad I did. These videos are awesome thanks for your time and effort 👍
Урок географии в немецкой школе.Учитель-,,Дети,какой самый большой город в мире?,,Встает мальчик-,,Сталинград!,,Учитель-???!!!Мальчик-,,Мне дедушка говорил,что они полгода по одной улице шли ,но так до конца и не дошли,,
Братцы Мы должны быт в месте Мы значить страны Снг казахи украйнцы белорусы киргизы таджики узбеки и русские нам делить нечего нашы деды нам отстояли это победу и страну землью ....
Kanat Rozakov да сделали страну понамешали религии традиции, некоторое отношение одного менталитета к другому вызывает агресию, из за этого людей обеденили понятиями как на зоне, из за этого всегда будет корупция и безответственое воспитание, страны СНГ скоро будут жить хуже чем отсталая африка вот что такое ссср обречен на жалкое существование
Александр Кулагин Так то доходили
@@kanatrozakov1747 Дурыс
@@kanatrozakov1747 Финны в 1918-м от России отделились. Так и прозябают в нищете, холоде и голоде.
I don't really care if this movie is 100% accurate or 100% propaganda, it was still visually exciting depicting a battle between Soviets and Germans in WW 2. I "know" it's a movie and not a real battle. In a real war things happen that aren't supposed to, and things don't happen that should happen. It is the vagaries and chance effects of reality.
The movie is based on real events
It was a real hardest war in 4 years long, and lots of hard battles, heroic feats! Simple people who went to this regiment volunteers, understood that depends on them, whether the enemy will break to the capital. If they fail their comrades, which the Panzer corps, the Germans will go into the flank. Nowhere to retreat - behind Moscow.
So you can talk about movies about Batman or marvel comics, what could or could not be there.
But in the war that occurred, these events are not subject to doubt. Just as you will not come to doubt the reality of "Day D", for example. Or Pearl Harbor.
more about the historical context and filming en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panfilov%27s_28_Men
@@dmitryk.2813 It is not. It is based on a propaganda story.
@@TitovIgorBro Здесь это обсуждать неуместно! "При этом сам факт тяжёлых оборонительных боёв 316-й стрелковой дивизии против 2-й и 11-й немецких танковых дивизий (прим. численность личного состава немецких дивизий значительно превосходила советскую) на Волоколамском направлении 16 ноября 1941 года и проявленный при этом бойцами дивизии героизм не оспаривался"
Based on a real battle that happened, but the real story was that there were never 28 soldiers left to fight the battle.
Finally a scene where soviets don’t just run at the Germans shooting at the sky screaming
the film is 28 panfilovtsev
Cool movie. To remember!
nice thanks
panfilov's 28 men
And the last scene shown at the very end?
American's movies about WW2:"Awesome!" , "That's how we kick back Nazis! ",...and no arguments about its realness.
Russian's movies with the same subject : *PROPAGANDA*
The main burden of the war with the Nazis in 1941-1945 fell to the Russian army. Americans and the British only in 1944 decided to enter the battlefield and entered into direct battles with the Nazis. They did it for one reason only, that the Russian army could liberate Europe without them. In this case, they could not count on the laurels of the winners. This is the real participation of Americans in the second world war. And it is not very significant. You may not believe it, but that's the military history of the 20th century.
Not really. There was a huge shitstorm about the "realism" in FURY.....an american movie
@@ralfweber4346 It is necessary to distinguish between the movie about the war and the facts of military history. In feature films the Director would not be to thoroughly reproduce some event. Everyday life is boring and this movie will not watch the audience. Therefore, the Director thinks out the events. So, the movie "Fury" and other war movies it is only the interpretation on the second world war. Those who are looking for accurate information about the war should not go to the movies and to a Museum or archive.
@@gridfilm9551 True! But Stalin gladly let them join the fight to lessen the casualty the Soviet had paid too much for its cause.Guess Power corrupted him and turned him into second Hitler with the obsession of absolute control.
Весь мир знает что вы лучше всех, во всем )))), и Гитлера победили, и фильмы самые лучшие )))
Outstanding resolve by those panzer 3 commanders to hold fire for so long before fighting back. Very generous 10/10
Every time the soviet 45mm AT guns hit they're AP, but every time they miss it's HE. Amazing!
And the AT rifle always pierce the frontal armor from 100 metres.
Real sniper heroes.
the gunners were in prepared positions, ready with direct fire guns. Sighting a howitzer in this video is not shown in the start that they were fired from a distance. Then were forced to retreat as they went up the German planes.
After the position of anti-tank artillery was known, a second wave of artillery preparation the Germans she was swept away, there was one gun. Which was also suppressed by tank fire. So everything is realistic.
This is footage from the film "28-m Panfilov warriors." They're Russian Spartans. In November 1941, the division of Russian General Panfilov was at the forefront of the Nazi troops ' strike on the capital of Russia - Moscow. Panfilov's soldiers became a stone wall that the Nazis could not penetrate. Part of the front where stood the soldiers of the Panfilov heroes, the Nazis are unable to move forward nor to one meter. These soldiers were true heroes not only for Russia , but for all who in those years fought with fascists the US, Britain, France and other countries. Panfilov's feat of war is an example of how to fight an enemy that seeks to enslave your homeland. Eternal memory to the soldiers of General Panfilov!
This never happened.
This may as well be the Russian equivalent of saving private ryan only that this story is a hisotrical Myth that was utlizied by Stalin for propaganda purposes and was propagated for years before being exposed as never happened.
www.pri.org/stories/2016-10-15/russia-chooses-myth-over-history-new-wwii-movie
@@kcz1093 maybe more the equivalent of "Fury"...
I recommend a book "10 Myths of the 2nd World War " by Aleksiej Isajew and a view on this particular case,its a legend and propaganda's masterpice to raise the morale in 41 when Soviets were retreating all the way, every nation has one and this is the one
@@MrBielsoN Information about the battle of Panfilov near Moscow first appeared in Newspapers in 1942. There was a war and without propaganda was not (maybe exaggerated by the number of destroyed tanks). In modern times, the press was discussing the number of Nazi tanks that were burned by Panfilov's soldiers. Someone it looked that with tanks exaggerated. Someone with these do not agree. This and other details can be argued for a long time. Indisputable is the fact that Panfilov's Division was the bravest division of the red army. They were like Rangers. They couldn't be defeated. By the way, most of them were Kazakhs and Kyrgyz by nationality. They are descendants of the great Genghis Khan. The defence sector was where the soldiers of the Panfilov was the main direction of attack of the Nazis. Panfilov fighters withstood this blow and did not let the Germans to Moscow. This is a historical fact.
@@ralfweber4346 no because fury wasn't advertised as a "true Story" the legend of Paniflovs 28 was, and as was the associated film marketing
No compromise on the reality and accuracy in fighting scene. The most realistic eastern-front film .
UJ32 what movie is this?
@@ZzBiohazzardzZ "28 панфиловцев"
@@ZzBiohazzardzZ panfilov 28
Best war movie ever seen. Whole movie is a battle!
Keep you under tension, supprizing end and the ant the most interesting-based on true story
This is a great example of brains vs brawns. If you set the trap well enough, you can catch a bear.
@WTW 142 I have no doubt that the Germans have great strategists but I think in this case they probably didn't think too much on it as they thought the fight would be over in a little skirmish.
@@fasiapulekaufusi6632 it a fictional movie....Nothing more.
And an attack with infantry and tanks on a trench is not a trap.
@@ralfweber4346 I know that I'm just playing alot with my imagination.
Wow better effects than Fury when tank is hitted, more realistic
This might be propaganda, but that is some bad-ass music for the start of this scene :D
The song is called nazi hydra if you wanted it
Awesome cinematography! The dude (Mongolian?) with the BFG demonstrated the fear a high caliber weapon can bring to the battlefield. I’d really liked it better to have some CC’ing to understand them. Good job.🙂
Bill Bowen he said in the movie he’s from Kazakhstan
1:14 thats platooned artillery on WoT in a nutshell
I give the Russian army a lot of respect for how bad of a beating they took in the beginning of the war with Germans and how bad they were pushed back they held there ground. It took them awhile to muster up enough soldiers and equipment to bring on a counter attack which was able to push the Germans back and the Germans never recovering from it.
@Im Just One Simple Guy He's partially the reason The Germans got so deep into the USSR. Executed multiple generals a bit before Hitler showed his true colors and went to attack them, which crippled the command structure, also the terrible idea to attack Finland which had hard to navigate terrain and was buried in snow, that lost them resources and manpower which could have been used to help fight the germans.
Game Or Death If he don’t execute them and left those that were so called obedient,then all his troops will just run away from the battle and non of his general will ever listen to him.Your understanding of all of these stratagems are very superficial,lad.
Soviet army...hello
@@youandme6199 like to thank you for your reply. I'm a ex American soldier I served back in the 77 to 89 I have been doing a lot of studying of the second WW and alot on the Russian front I can say when it starts to look bad for your country your country man and woman pulled together and came out on top.
@Im Just One Simple Guy What are you talking about.. Tens of millions of Ukrainians served in the USSR government, the red army etc.. I think you mean the Germans were massacring Ukrainians, Russians, Poles etc..
First time I see soldiers shooting anti tank rifles.
Recoil and operation of all guns look very realistic to me !
Guys, this film was made on real events of 1941 near Moscow. A whole armada of "heavily armed" Nazis were stopped by a division from Kazakhstan. Heroic battle 28 soldiers !!! We honor their courage and valor, remember them !!!
What's the exact unit size of an armada?
Sorry, it is not based on real events, but on the Soviet myth (and current Medinsky's lie) created by the local authorities. Sergei Mironenko, the head of research of the Russian state archives published documents from the Soviet military prosecutor's investigation of this case. Quite indicatively for today's Russia, he lost his job for not demystifying Panfilovstev. This is not about questioning bravery of these people, but about not ashaming their memory with lie. www.rferl.org/a/mironenko-state-archive-chief-removed-from-post-panfilov-legend/27619460.html
@@karelsvoboda7817 It is a historical fact that heavy defensive battles of the 316th rifle division of the Soviet troops against the 2nd tank and 35th infantry divisions of the Wehrmacht on the Volokolamsk area on November 16, 1941. Selected German troops did not go further in the direction of Moscow, where there was only less than 60 km. This is a historical fact !!! And lovers change the story is full. By the way, this Russian scientist was fired from his job.
@@ranvabclc The positions of the 4th group headed by political commander V. Klochkov are subjected to the most massive attacks. Within four hours Panfilov held back tanks and infantry of the enemy. They repelled several attacking enemy and destroyed 18 tanks. These were the most unprecedented feats of the legendary warriors who died the death of the brave. Several people were badly injured. The battle of Dubosekovo went down in history as a feat of 28 Panfilov members. The 28 participants in this battle, who considered everyone dead, were given the title Hero of the Soviet Union.
@@stmstm7219 read the documents. These were not 28 people, etc. Nobody questions the battle, but the story of 28 Panfilovtsev Firing somebody for telling the truth and providing evidence for it is simply a shame. Even Medinsky had to recognize that the story is simply a myth, not the truth.
The positions of the 4th group headed by political commander V. Klochkov are subjected to the most massive attacks. Within four hours Panfilov held back tanks and infantry of the enemy. They repelled several attacking enemy and destroyed 18 tanks. These were the most unprecedented feats of the legendary warriors who died the death of the brave. Several people were badly injured. The battle of Dubosekovo went down in history as a feat of 28 Panfilov members. The 28 participants in this battle, who considered everyone dead, were given the title Hero of the Soviet Union.
It must be remembered that the names are not so important, since the journalist did not have the opportunity to reliably find out the names of the fighters who fought there. Therefore, they recorded 28 names of killed or missing fighters.
never happened. more "russian" lies . . . . . . .
Отлично снято! Спасибо за фильм.
Men with real balls on both sides. Fuck ya! I always thought this battle of Hoth segment was the best in the RTJ!!
Ah damn I am spoiled by the awesome scenes shared by SBB
Nice to see a PTRD used in a film.
Many people msg me asking abt who is the singer, its " Aida Nikolaychuk".
Не тримай
And can you please tell me the name of the movie at the very end that starts at 5:30 ?
Ukrainian song
Simple,but accurate,game.The old PS2 Panzer Front Ausf. B.You learn to have a healthy respect for anti-tank rifles.Dangerous as heck and a bugger to eliminate.
Good job with the 1/6 scale tanks film makers
Great video. Russia makes really good WWII movies now days. Russia paid the ultimate price in that war.
To be fair, Russia wouldn't have made a very good one if they lost the war. Victors decide the narrative!
@@mstegs5477 Disagree, little too much propaganda. Seen another Russian WWII movie and a German gunner with an MG42 shoots into an advancing line of Russian troops and doesn't hit a single one before getting killed. That was an absolute joke.
NOW, this is GOOD!
Hi Shotgun, it would be great if you could name the sources of your clips, because they're great.
герман панцер дивизион запомни день и метры эти в советском союзе самые длинные километры
Хорошо сказано дружище
Did they use the Real vintage Pz IV Ausf D?
Not only Russians but Kazakhs also
I saw the biggest collection of running panzers in Russia it was amazing
Germans watching this: DECOY?!?!?!?! 😭😭😭
But imagine if the kv 2 and other heavy arrive there
It would be definitely a carnage . Even 1 kv2 would be enough to seal the deal .
Kv2 is inaccurate. Takes a shit load of minutes to reload. And its slow too.
Kv2’s purpose is to destroy bunkers and trenches not for tank to tank combat
LoL that was why they were so succesfull....... not...
Dang these Russians are smart af
I just understand how they could win any battle without John Wayne
Russians: *kv 2 divisions released in front line with My Army music*
One of the oddest but most effective weapons of the era- the anti-tank rifle.
Фильм "28 панфиловцев"
Да ахуенный фильм
Спасибо.
Clip was from the movie 🎥 Panfilovs 28 heros (men), it's great movie!
The background music is so much louder than the sound effects on the movie
I'm open to all countries in the world.It's educational to see other countries' propaganda.
This film maybe is a propaganda idk, but...
It shows real situation on Eastern Front in 1941.
You know...at that time germans really just rushed like that. (cuz of blitzkrieg)
Sometimes successfully, fast and organized (like in Kiev, Minsk and etc.) but sometimes they had to spend waves of their soldiers and tanks just on one well fortified position. (like in Brest or Bobruisk)
Most of the time they just cutted thru tanks like T-26, T-50 and BT-5/7 but sometimes they had to fight against T-34 and KV-1 with guns of PZ-2/3...
You know this story is about 28 soldiers who were like KV-1 against PZ-3. They held their trenches until they died. They had great rifles like SVT-40's, a lot of grenades, good position and etc.
@@lovepeace9727 no this is not what blitzkrieg is...
@@lovepeace9727 this is depicted as slowkrieg bro
Hahaha yeah... Soviet victory is a propaganda...
Assh*le :v
Robert McCarthy coming from a man whose last name McCarthy what do you expect pure evil
What movie is this?
The 28 Mans of Panfilov
28 pafilov,I knew
The Great TH Bitch thank you 🙏
28 Panfilovs (there were more of them, but they died) from Kazakhstan stopped the main German attack on Moscow. Russia calls it a myth, but the Kazakhs remember everyone who went to the front for the USSR.
Don't be fooled by foreigners. The film is shot in Russia and the money is mainly Russian, collected all over the world!
The feat of 28 Panfilov heroes is one of the most famous stories about the war in Russia!
What military journalists during the war, a little embellished it, nothing changes. We know what the media is. Truth is important. And this feat will remain in centuries!
They are doing a better job than Fury, but those tanks are still too close together. German doctrine specifies a spacing of about 50 meters between tanks in a platoon.
It would not work for a movie, too few tanks in the shot
@@IvanAlejandro99 I've heard that excuse before, and I don't buy it. How many tanks do there really need to be in a single shot? If you want to convey a sense of the scale of the fighting then pull out for a wide shot that shows a full platoon of 4/5 tanks spread out over a couple hundred meters. If you shoot the formation side-on in an open plain you could even get a full company in the shot. Otherwise it would not be too difficult to have intense yet realistic onscreen combat while only showing one or two tanks at a time.
I keep hearing creatives making excuses for why realism wouldn't work for their material. But every time I hear that I can't help but remember that the most realistic games and movies are by far the best ones. Those that really have a passion for the history can usually make realism work just fine within a compelling and dramatic story. Those that make excuses for why it wouldn't work are too prideful to admit that they just didn't know any better, and either lack the creativity to break out of the mindset of "how it's always been done" or are too lazy to try.
Ultimately realism has no substantive impact on the drama of a story. But for those of us that know what things should look like a lack of realism can pull us out of the story, and remind us that we are watching a movie at a time when we should instead be completely immersed. Plus realism just shows us that the creative team took pride in representing a period of history. And that's always nice to see.
I thought that the German tanks would fall into a 'decoy trench'.
A normal day in russia
Great action scenes!
Красной Армии - слава!!!
The best action I've ever seen! I want more!
This attack seemed half-hearted. Wouldn't the tanks at least attempt to give suppressing fire?
Every human being who loves freedom owes more thanks to the Red Army than he can pronounce in his whole life!
well maybe not the people who lived and died under the iron curtain.
28 Panfilovtsev. Good movie.
“Not one step back “ - Stalin
2 раза казахи защищали Москву от Банапарта и Гитлера, а об этом Россия всячески умалчивает, наши герои лётчица, снайпераша, пулимётчица, танкистки, полководца Кошкарбаев первый возразил флаг над рейхстага, казахи тюрки сильный народ.
Whoever watched "Soviet Storm" episode Battle of Kursk knew this scene is real..
Whoever watched "Soviet Storm" also believe that Santa Claus is real ;-).
This scene is pure fiction and propaganda.
this scene is not anything about the Battle of Kursk. This is the story of a Rifle Regiment sent out to the outskirts to meet the German attack on Moscow.
@@BigBeautifulCountry more a rifle platoon and of course a fictional story
@@ralfweber4346
I'm aware that some historians have recently dug out archived documents showing that the Russian war correspondent who filed the news report on the last 28 men of Panfilov's company had brushed up his version of their defense of Moscow against a mighty German attack. But the verdict on it is not yet final. There are still many Muskovites who believed that even if the brushed up part is taken out, enough will remain as to merit honoring Panfilov's 28. So much so that these same people contributed money to underwrite the production of the movie in time for the 70th anniversary of the defense of Moscow.
@@BigBeautifulCountry would be interesting to know how much the government contributed to these production...
Since Syria and Iraq conflicts started, more and more people are watching these kind of war videos. World wants another big war to restart the slowing economies.
The Observer do you want your city destroyed to restart economy?
War ist shit
There are other ways to slow down economy
You a fucking shit head, The world does not want a war just the fucking goverments moron.....
This is where they were said to have been stopped outside Moscow.
This is "Panfilov's 28", not a bad Russian WW II movie, if you like this sort of film. It runs for two hours, this is just a short clip from the second half.
Sa vama Srbija navek braco! 🇷🇺🇷🇸❤️❤️
This film was called "28 Panfilov", this is a famous Soviet legend, based, however, on very real events. These heroes were called "Panfilov" by the name of the commander of the 316th division, General Ivan Panfilov (3 days after the events of the film, he was killed by a shell fragment at his command post). When I watched the film in 2016, I was surprised that the general himself was never mentioned in the film.
sir, you are a great man
I have a sudden urge to go back to company of heroes 2 now.
Хороший фильм. Приятная песня.
Well done.
Alien should make ww2 movie because only alien is neutral
What was 'decoy' or a trap about the trench, like the title says? It was occupied and delivering firepower that didn't withdraw.
It is so the germans focused on the trench instead of the main soviet troops in the flanks
In the original movie, the soviets made a decoy trench ahead of the their actual trenches. This caused the Germans to barrage it with artillery, however since these were decoys, all of the Soviet soldiers were alive. Then the soviets let the Germans come closer, to make them think that the artillery had done its job.
This is a movie not the real thing. One of the real combats the Russians did was flushing out the Germans from tanks! The Russians also rushed to the Germans with their tanks at point blank and opened fired!
I think Stugs/pz4/panthers n tigers more likely than panzer threes but depends..
Certainly the Germans realised the panzer three was outdated after the first few years...that's not to say they didn't use them as sometimes you had to use what you had...
It is 1941 here....so there could not be any Tigers and Panthers.
There were NO Tigers or Panthers in 1941. And there were only earlier versions of Pz III/IV and Stugs with 30-50mm armour at that time. Actually, this time German Panzerwaffe were armed worse than Red Army's tank units but they had an anvantage in experience, training and tactics, that's why the Red Army suffered such heavy losses in 1941 and allowed the Germans to go so far.
Anti Tank kit available near your location
lol brother, pick it up an shot for BF sake!!!
them 45mm are good at penetrating armor at 500m
сцена из фильма 28 панфиловцев.обычный тяжелый бой на той тяжелой войне.
2:34 fuhrer on a panzer
Damn, this movie was good...
Anyone know what is movie name?
28 panfilovtsev
Bukit Barisan Panfilov's 28 Men
I found a Russian WWII film a long time ago but i forget it's name now but it seemed to be in black and white with a brown shade instead of traditional black and white and there's a scene with Soviet Soldiers walking across shallow waters and trying to get organized while most of their Armored Vehicles have been flipped over, anyone know what film this is?
Lights on after dark? That's a BIG no no... and firing one of those 20mm (I think that's the correct caliber) anti-vehicle rifles can't have been very pleasant.
Not sure they would even penetrate.
This is PTRD rifle, can penetrate armor near 40mm. Soviet soldiers used it for side/rear attack. Sometimes they shoot to the weakly armored places in front projection
loampey1 ptrd could penetrate pz-2/3 easily, there is a lot of places in the front of the tank, for example viewing instruments, commander towers. Tracks was also weak place of the tanks.
that anti tank 20mm rifle is useless, i don't see any kills?
Soviets didn’t use 20 mm. They used 14,5mm PTRS and PTRD ant tank rifles what use 14,5x114 ammo what has energy two times bigger than .50 cal or .50 BMG (12,7x99)
@@zepter00 I see, it was effective against panzer 2 and panzer 1 perhaps SKZ255 halftrack. Not sure even 3 is struggling. Its very difficult to take out panzer3..the sheels is not strong enough to go thru ..but according to history, these brave soldiers has to punch thru at close range to penertae 20mm or top 15mm steel plates. However, later german had space armour introduced, and this makes the anti rifle entirely useless.
John Mar early Panzer 3 and Panzer 4 were taken out by Polish anti tank rifle Ur wz 35 caliber 7,92mm (cartridge 7,92x107 DS). It is nothing for 14,5 mm x114 AP or API. It can deafet 32-33 mm RHA at 500 meters. 35-40 mm RHA at 100 meters
@@zepter00 seriously, i thought even 37mm anti tank was not enough to take out panzer4. Correct me, so where did they aimed at??just curious.
John Mar 37mm Bofors anti tank gun was designed before war. It is not about caliber,..it is about muzzle velocity and material what penetrator was made. Shoter of anti tank rifles had good result engaging even heavier tank at front shoting at tracks, commanders uppolas, periscope, visiors, Panzer 3 could be engaded at whole frontal armour surface
Interesting how in russian movies they are always "desperate" but, at the end, they manage to easily kill 10 panzer with just one molotov bottle! ( By the way, germans did not use their panzer to protect infantry and for sure they werent used to run them at just 10 Km/h, as you can see here! )
How fast do you think WW2 tanks could go...across deep snow, without damaging their transmission. This is pretty accurate to how Infantry and armor would work in tandem. Perhaps the Germans would have half tracks to help the infantry drive up, but considering the lack of mechanization in the Wermacht, this is a plausible scenario? Also if advancing across open ground, the infantry would be in support of the tanks and thus behind the armor. until they could fan out and attack the trench, it is not out of the question that they would have Armor protecting the infantry. Finally, the Soviets have Zis anti tank guns and PTSDs at close range. Both of which were easily capable of knocking out a PZIV at the range depicted.
I do agree these movies are often leaning towards the Russian, but in this scene, not much out of the ordinary is happening. The germans attack a trench, get flanked lose 3 to 4 tanks, 20/30 men. Withdraw in good order.