The 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz Is The Perfect Compromise Between A Truck & SUV
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 лип 2024
- A Car-Truck is a weird thing that will grab the attention of buyers looking for something different. We haven't seen something like this since the Subaru Baja departed over a decade ago. For 2022, #Hyundai is reviving the UTE with the brand-new #HyundaiSantaCruz, this part SUV and part truck #SantaCruz utility vehicle should appeal to shoppers who can't decide between getting a truck or an SUV.
We're also on:
Instagram: / redline_reviews
Facebook: / liketheredline
Twitter: / tweettheredline - Авто та транспорт
I bought the Limited and really like it. Out runs, drives, tows, hauls and yes, cost more then the Maverick. Interior is Way more comfortable. Tech is way better. Display is clear, bright and fast. Self driving is next level. **After 2K miles I have not noticed any shutter whatsoever.
Have you used the adaptive cruise control very much? That's when he found it shuttering.
@@wylierudhman1603 Yes, I use it nearly every drive both in town and highway. Incredible! and no shutter at all.
Hyundai ACC and land keeping assist is really good.
Do you mean shudder?
@@OMGWTFLOLSMH Hahaha - Yes Shudder. (I plead the fifth and blame Siri) Sorry...
What the reviewer mentioned he was noticing at takeoff.
From what I've seen the Hyundai is going to be the "better" vehicle. Drives better then the maverick, more premium options, better materials but it's also like 10k-15k more than the maverick. The maverick isn't trying to pretend it's a premium car for a budget it knows its a budget car and does a good job at it.
I'm not sure I would agree. I bought the Santa Cruz limited and it's not pretending... It is a premium vehicle. It cost $41K+. The Maverick Lariat runs about 3K less at 38K+ (*NOT 10-15K more) But the Santa Cruz has more features.... The Cruz starts at 23K, the Ford at 20K but again the Santa Cruz has more features and much better warranty.
All I can say is that anyone considering buying a Maverick should at least test drive the Santa Cruz for sure. I drove both and the Cruz is hands down the nicer trucklet!
**Still both nice little trucks and along with a Honda ridgeline I think the numbers will prove that these new unibody small trucks are going to be very very popular moving forward! People that don't need a big truck now have more choice.
Top of the line , the Santa cruz is 5 thousand more. It is the better built vehicle. The maverick already has a stop sales order on it. Malfunctioning rear seat belts or somthing. Big reason the maverick is cheaper is its not built as well but also the maverick is built in Mexico
@@robertsn6584 Being built in Mexico has nothing to do with it. Their quality is the same. They're still actual humans with the same management system. Why do so many people think the quality is lesser if it's built in Mexico? Is it the weather?
@@Ichibuns Japanese cars that are built in Japan have better quality control than the ones built here so people think the same thing applies.
@@JDMSwervo2001 Their management IS very different and so are their suicide rates
The Santa Cruz transports Air just as well as a F-150 😄
Just so you guys know about build quality. The Maverick is built in Mexico. The 2.0 ecoboost engine is built in spain .. so the american ford truck isnt american at all . The Santa cruz is built In Alabama and the engine and transmission are also built in the USA.
Who cares where it’s built?
@@1209MArky : non-Ford fanbois do.
@@tooltalk I’m not a ford fan boy and my profile pic was my mustang I haven’t owned for years. What difference does it make where it’s made? Is it better quality? Does it perform better?
@@tooltalk I have a GTI made in Mexico, why tf do I care? It drives like GTI made in Germany lmao.
People who only buy American cars are too stupid to actually look at where the car is built. They only see a Ford badge and assume it is built in America. In reality, it doesn’t even matter. Buy the car that you like best.
Fantastic review! Loved the early and comprehensive spec graphic you included. Thanks Sofyan, very nicely done.
First of all Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year for you and yours. And second thank you for the show. For what I see about that truck it has a good pickup and it has a nice Style. And like always kudos for that demonstration thank you!!!
My SC limited only shuddered once on my test drive under 10 miles, and it has not done it anymore. It rides great and very fast, great warranty, tech, and lots of safety features, and fit and finish. Glad I went with the SC instead of the Maverick.
This is a great review. Tons of information that's very useful to consumers. You also give the information in a way that's easy to understand. I just wish the reviews were done the other way around. Could you drive/review the base models or even the step up. While discussing what's available on the higher models. Of course the top model is going to look great. Ijs it would be nice to see the the review on the model most people are going to buy. Keep up the great work though. Thank you for the information.
A Maverick Lariat Luxury package with the AWD cost over 35K. So this Santa Cruz is a really nice alternative. At most, its only 5K more expensive for WAY BETTER interior, materials, technology, driving assistance features, design, etc. My personal opinion is hybrid get the maverick, gas engine get the Santa cruz.
Hadn’t heard about this before. Great video.
Wow 5.96 seconds for a truck like that, is honestly pretty impressive. Quite quick.
Both Hyundai and Ford have respected winners in this segment, something somewhere down the road other manufacturers will be envious of.
I'm in love with the Santa Cruz! It's bold.. It's innovative...And it doesn't remind me of a truck, compares to the Maverick! All I can think when I see the Maverick is " Fleet truck". Which is nothing wrong if you own a business...However, I'm not a trucky person at all. I understand the Maverick packaging. Only offers push to start on the top Lariat trim. And no cruise control and power mirrors on the base XL. Just seems like the Maverick is offering 2012 features instead of 2022. I just think the Maverick will do well in fleet sales. Since Ford put a halt on the Maverick hybrid pre-orders for next year and dealers doing markups like crazy, that might persuade others to look elsewhere. And yes, the Ford Maverick is less expensive as the Santa Cruz. However, the Ford Escape Base trim cost $2000 more than the Hyundai Tuscon SE base trim...And the Tuscon is bigger, has more standard features, and slightly more horsepower. Which the Santa Cruz SE is priced as much as the base Tuscon.
I know you drove it a couple months ago at Sonoma, but are you going to do a full review on the Hyundai Elantra N. I just got it and love it. A legit "Fun" car. Love to hear your impressions when you actually get some time with it.
Really appreciate the detail and throughness you put into all of your reviews. I would be interested in knowing if you think this approximates a small, luxury SUV like the Lincoln Corsair in terms of ride, comfort and maneuverability? I am going to test drive an SEL premium for myself to find out but just curious on your thoughts. Thanks again for all you do.
While the pricing is a little steep, this is hands down the perfect vehicle for me. It does everything a mid-50s male needs in a vehicle. Good power, good interior space, and a very flexible cargo space. While my old ass wishes it was a stick, at least it’s not one of those awful CVT’s! If it was more affordable, I’d be on it like flies at a picnic. I’ll wait a couple of years and pick up one used.
Steep? Loaded its 40K. A base 4x4 crew cab full size start at that price. If you want cheap, you can go with a Maverick but that vehicle does have really poor quality, materials, etc which is fine as long as you don't care. Unfortunately many do which is where the Santa Cruz comes into play.
I'm really hoping they drop a hybrid engine into this. I have a 2016 Kia Optima SX, which I love, but I've seen the Santa Cruz in person a few times and the more I look at it the more I like it. I'll be seriously considering picking up one of these in the next couple of years. It'll be interesting to see if unibody designs carry over to Kia and other brands too.
Between the subaru outback touring XT and this truck...what is your preference?
I have the same power train with the turbo and I average 27-32 mpg for highway.
I have an sel premium purchased in Oct 2021 love it it has 8.6 inches of ground clearance one tenth Lower then my old crosstrek xv limited from 2015 this has much nicer interior🙏👍😀
Does the Santa Cruz come with manual or automatic?
Man that looks good in white
Important to note that the 2.5l Turbo smartstream motor is dual injection. So no more GDI carbon buildup on the intake valves.
Does this have a spare tyre compartment?
I got to test drive a basic FWD with standard motor. The motor seemed peppy once rpm’s were screaming. I think programmed to remain in higher gear longer to save fuel, then not much in middle, then screaming and unpleasant. I shall do turbo. I was very pleasantly surprised to enjoy a more car-like ride and quiet inside. 6’2” tall and tons of front seat legroom, they could skinny the console and allow more width for legs. Seat all the way back and armrest is a little too short. I did fit my e-bike in back nicely and rather than buy $400 “extender” plastic thing, just use the secondary tailgate higher latch position, (side benefit, less paint 90 degree directly exposed to stones tossed from the road). I also will cover entire tailgate paint with clear plastic 3M paint protection and cable lock bike to be sure it’s not moving in any driving scenario. Couldn’t find any red flag so far. The bed closer to ground than Chev Colorado/Ford Ranger is very good for bike in and out, and those two are more truckish ride which I definitely do not want. Some UA-camr coined LOL thought on the outside view of the Maverick, “It looks like the truck that arrives when the pest control guy is called”. Spit coffee out LOL.
It is the car, truck and suv - 3 in one vehicle. So cool!
My cousin's fiancé has one, he loves it. This vehicle is growing on me.
I wonder if you can put a dongle for wireless CarPlay? For the money, you’d think it works have wireless CarPlay. I saw this on the road last night and had to take a double look and slowed down to see the name, so I could look it up.
Had mine for about three days now and no issues. Defiantly an eye catch since not many around. I wanting to see how it does on 93 octane.
When does the Tesla Model 3 Performance review come out?
He owned one before. Did he say he’d do another one? He would need to get one from an owner
@@garrettw99 He did get a 2022 for review. Follow him on Facebook and instagram.
Really like the Santa cruz it was between this and the Mavrick but what I noticed with both options is they did not feel truck like which I proffered the mavrick def felt more truck like but still not enough. Went with a Nissan Frontier and seems to be best blend of both worlds.
Another great choice! Very nice looking truck! I think I like the looks more then my Santa Cruz and I really like my Cruz!
Why the hell would you want something that feels truck-like? Stiff ride, noisier and no AWD. No thanks.
I love this ride. God knows ifff I had the money, I'd get one. No question.
Imagine this car with the Stinger engine.
Respectfully, great leg shots.
Pricing is a little too steep, I think offering the turbo engine on the lesser trim would most likely sell better.
I honestly like what Hyundai has done here. But I think Ford's approach with the Maverick will be more successful. Cost, fuel economy and versatility are what will dominate in this segment. The Ford wins in that regard. The Hyundai feels more up-market and offers more creature comfort and amenities. It certainly wins in that regard.
The fords advantage in my opinion is the truck like looks and the cheap price (relatively speaking). The Santa Cruz doesn’t make sense above 30k, just get a taco.
@Jonathan A the Ridgeline is a larger, more expensive vehicle. You can almost get two Mavericks for the cost of a Ridgeline.
@Jonathan A they are the same TYPE of vehicle but they are not in the same class. For clarification.
@Jonathan A uh huh...you got it bro.
@Jonathan A Maverick is based on Ford's C2 COMPACT platform. Ridgeline is MIDSIZE.
Saw a few on the road and they look better in person. Like someone else though, think Ford is going to do better with the Maverick
Ford will sell way way more Mavericks but that doesn't mean the Hyundai Santa Cruz won't be a solid performer. The Hyundai is only built in one plant in Alabama and only going to be sold in United States. The Maverick is built in Mexico and has already sold out for 2022...
I still think the Cruz is going to sell like gangbusters but again, nowhere near as many as the Ford maverick. Every company, from Bug exterminator to pool cleaner, that needs a work truck is going to buy a Ford Maverick
@@macsterguy Burger exterminator lol
@@2004cyrus Hahaha, Siri is killing me today... Bug exterminator. I love Burgers!
@@macsterguy : Ford sold 3K more Mavericks in FY2021, but the Santa Cruz outsold the Maverick in the latest quarter 4Q 2021. The SC and Maverick were named "fastest selling vehicles" in Aug and Oct 20221, but at this point, both companies are supply-constrained.
@@macsterguy The Santa Cruz is also sold in Canada
I miss the Subaru Baja. Hope they will bring it back one day.
That would be a really smart move to bring it back.
I am so jealous everytime I see one
Honda needs to do something like this with the crv it’s an appealing car for sure, not a pick up truck but this will work for lot ppl.
With the CR-V? Huh? Don't you mean the Ridgeline?
VERY NICE BRO! GET GOOD DRIVERS!
I really like the Santa Cruz, but I am pretty much committed to going EV or at least hybrid with my next car. I'll wait to see if Hyundai eventually produces an EV version of this.
This is the cutest truck ever I want it so bad
How in the world has Hyundai not picked up on the dislikes of the "no knob" volume button in other competitors???? Maybe a small detail but in this day and age, it's is basic knowledge now that we all like knobs for controls.
Duh, that's b/c only the top trim has touch volume control (no knob volume button) and, considering that the average selling price is only $34K, most SC's sold aren't the $41K top trim.
Hmm... I take that back. It seems like at least 1/4 of all SCs sold are the top Limited AWD trims.
Great for the regular home owner who needs to make frequent Home Depot trips but would like a “truck” that will fit in the typical American 2 car garage. Neighbors parked their F-150 on the driveway in all seasons cause it will never fit in their garage.
Own a Honda Ridgeline, it fits in most garages, it is bigger than the Santa Cruz (but much smaller than a F150).
I’ve seen a Santa Cruz and Maverick in person. Santa Cruz is much much nicer and does not look bad at all. Only thing I’d say is the bed is very tiny on this and not very capable. It definitely catches attention. But def needs turbo standard, every brand needs to do it not just VW
VW’s standard turbo engines are actually really slow and built for fuel economy. All their cars are pretty slow except for the sporty models.
The “bakkie” style, as it’s known in South Africa, the good ol’ Ford Ranchero, Chevy El Camino, reimagined as an SUV, aka the Jeepster. Everything old is new again.
I am here for the loud thunk.
Love mine. But it does have a tiny bit of shutter as well when at slow stop and go. It’s not a big deal. Overall such an awesome little Ute.
how much for that limited model?
Thank you Red Line,,,'''👌🤩👍🚘🌈
TMI
Can the rear or center differential/axels (4WD) lock be locked?.
Yes the rear can be locked, but its not a traditional locker, its clutch based and only sends 50% to the rear. So its a typical CUV style AWD and not an old school transfer case style 4WD. Its designed for light off roading not rock crawling.
@@johnmoore3504 -Ok.
Nice car to get if you are jealous of your landscaper's vehicle but don't have the need for a big truck.
Car manufactures really irritate me. It's 2022, you're paying over 30k for a premium vehicle, and yet it does not come with at least a 2 position seat memory feature. It's like really!?
That’s not a reasonable expectation for the Santa Cruz, especially since most of these are selling for base or close to it at $24k.
This thing is dope
If they just put this engine in the Tucson they will literally own the segment... The only competition is the CX5 turbo
I love my new CX-5
a 2.0T in the Tuscon would do wonders. It is underpowered. My wife’s Santa Fe Sport with 2.0T is similar size/weight and 235 hp really scoots. Maybe a shortage of parts, that 2.5 is in a lot of their cars. Kudos to Mazda though, their 2.5T has absolutely zero turbo lag. Even CX9 it feels fast.
@@gregmyrland2515 I'm iffy on the 2.0T, its less efficient and less powerful than the 2.5T. The thing is, the Santa Cruz and Genesis GV70 already have the 2.5T and they are all based on the same platform so it should be easy.
Nice!
Drove both but bought the base awd cuz the tranny on the turbo is jumpy and the turbo model is laggy the base motor has a faster take off
Demand is not going to call for it if they don't offer a hybrid....
I mean, I get it. They don't want to spend more money after they just spent money developing this all new vehicle, but they have to think. Ford is really showing them up, and a wait and see approach isn't going to impress any customers. Really, all automakers should offer hybrids across the line anyways.
It should be very easy to move the hybrid/PHEV powertrains from the Santa Fe and Tucson into the SC
They are marking these up so much that I'd get the Ford just on gp
Im so disappointed at the pricing of this truck. I wish it was 5K less.
All vehicles are overpriced especially now.
In this segment, that’s not possible. Buy a base Maverick if you want a $20k new truck.
@@jakekaywell5972 I saw the maverick in person but it has a cheap feel and not a lot of towing. I bought the Santa Cruz 3 weeks ago and love it
2022 and they put a pure gas engine in it. I bet within 3 years they have a hybrid of some sort. That’s when I’ll buy this.
@14:17 you said Ford offers with 2.3l turbo.. i think you meant 2.0T and think ford is 8speed
he was thinking of the 2.3 turbo ranger
id trade in my 2020 Telluride frt whl drive for this but the 4 cyl kills it. i get. 33mpg out of my Telluride cause it has a 3.8 an doesnt have to work as hard
Where are the physical knobs!!?
👍🏻 👍🏻 👍🏻 👍🏻👍🏻
Looks better than the Palisade
Would absolutely hate cleaning the bugs off that shiny front🤮
That’s for sure. I clean bugs off of my new Mazda CX-5 after every drive when I get home.
i actually enjoy the maverick lariat more, with the 2.0 Eco boost. its smaller and just feels more nimble. especially for the price, you can't beat it. This is nice though. I think the ford will sell a lot more.
It's sold out. It's named North America truck of the year 2022
I've driven plenty of suvs... This didn't feel like a suv to me. Hell I even forgot I was in a Hyundai.
@21:34 editing?
I assume it will also compete with the Honda Ridgeline - either directly or slightly indirectly, for people that don't want a full sized truck. I would take the Ford Maverick over the Santa Cruz, and I would take the Ridgeline over the Maverick. That in-bed storage is about 1/4 the size of the ridgeline, which, fully loaded cost only a $3000 more.
I haven't driven any of them, but owning a Honda currently, I'd probably go with the Ridgeline myself. But I would definitely want to drive both back to back before deciding. I'd probably go with the one that has the best ride and quietest cabin. I wouldn't even consider the Ford. Had lots of Fords and they were all crap cans.
@@OMGWTFLOLSMH I have a 2021 Ridgeline. Best vehicle I've ever owned.
These two vehicles does not compete with the Honda Ridgeline. The Honda Ridgeline compete with the mid-size truck segment.
The only thing that the three vehicles have in common is that they're unibody design compared to their body-on-frame siblings.
@@hybridstiger Yes, you are correct, from a manufactures marketing perspective, however in the real world where customers are making new vehicle decisions, these vehicles are much closer together especially when you look at the options for the cost - then the Ridgeline starts to look like a better option.
Here's another nice Korean car that we don't get it Korea! It's a shame because this would sell well here!
It won't sell well there that's why the corporate doesn't sell it there
@@Sean-pb5cn Admittedly, that's a possibility. But I don't think that's the case here. Ssangyong and Chevy are the only companies that sell compact trucks here and both of them think it's worth introducing new models. Koreans are in a kind of "outdoorsy" phase right now and something like this with a Hyundai badge would appeal to many of those shoppers. I suspect it has something to do with importing it from the US. I guess we'll never know, since the company has openly said we won't be getting this Santa Cruz. :(
Test drove the Maverick and was disappointed. Underpowered and PLASTIC interior was a big let down. Not sure how this Santa Cruz drives, but looking forward to test drive after watching this review. Cheers.
Didn't Subaru make these a couple decades ago?
You missed the best feature about this vehicle, you never mentioned the rear window! Is it manually operated or power?
Pretty sure it is powered. I don’t think it’s a huge feature on this car because it looks smaller than a piece of 8.5”x11” paper. Seems more for airflow
I have one- it’s manual. Very easy to slide and honestly forget it’s there sometimes haha
Too expensive here in PR, looks like they are scamming us here !
Subaru Baja - is the best car pick up truck.
Not gonna lie, with grill & emblem is so smoked out it looks like the Hyundai logo fell off from a hit 😂
Don't like that GDI fuel injection Also they've had engine problems in the past
I love the Santa Cruz and it's originally what I wanted... but now I'm going to get a Maverick because it has a bigger more usable bed and gets over 40mpg. I wish the Santa Cruz had a bigger bed and I wish the Maverick could tow more.
The bed of the Maverick isn't really that much bigger tbh. It's 4.5 vs 4.3 for the Santa Cruz
@@Kenjionigod Yes that true, I shouldn't have worded it that way. What I should have said the Mavericks bed is more usable. The way it's designed makes it easier to load big items like sheets of plywood.
@@homoerotic85 Ah, so you like the more DIY flexibility of the Maverick more. That makes more sense
@@Kenjionigod Yes
@@homoerotic85 The SC lets you do the 1/2 down tailgate thing too.
Is it just me or does the electric Silverado look like this Hyundai alot
True. To me first look was someone copied the 2012 Ridgeline.
maverick, looks like a truck, santa cruz does not...for that, I would get santa cruz
It looks like a croc
I bought the SC to replace my Adrenalin. Nice vehicle to drive but the disappointing thing for me is the bed. It’s functional in some regards but I drove to my daughters cabin on snow covered roads and when I arrived the bed had 3 inches of snow in it. I have the tonneau but the gate leaks terribly. I could load my Adrenalin with golf clubs suitcases and go on golf trip with friends. Never got dirt dust snow anything in bed so very useful. SC not so much
Is that a Sport Trac Adrenalin? I had never heard of that until now
@@garrettw99 Yes the Ford Sportrac
Kinda looks like the old Subaru Baja!
Loved the Baja
Not really. The Baja looked extremely awkward. This SC looks great, IMO.
That’s what Sofyan said.
@@OMGWTFLOLSMH agreed but it’s a similar idea
I just don't get the need for all of the glory black plastic.
Came to see if the door has a solid sounding "thung".
I believe that would be thunk sweetie.
oh shiznit son im finna cop dat mamma jamma in pink na mea ya feel mehh
Not digging the taillights...the rest is ok.
Wish it had a V6
Yea me too but V6 engines died with all the presidents worried about climate change BS and so they instituted CAFE Standards. And Biden increased the average requirement to 50mpg.
@@2004cyrus climate change really isn’t BS but okay.
@@treymorgan3463 it’s arrogant of the United States to think we can make a difference in Mother Nature while India and China pollute more than we do and don’t have to comply ever! The date is 2050 now but there is no discipline action if they don’t ever comply. Weather changes over time and always has since the beginning of time. We have more immediate emergencies to deal with versus something as huge and far off as weather change. It’s going to change and we can’t control it. There are reasons for that and I won’t go into them.
@@2004cyrus , flipping from climate to weather (very different things) and quoting propaganda points gives you zero credibility in this subject matter.
@@michaels3003 what are your points of view. I have the most credibility in this thread. The Bible, God, teaches that climates change because he changes them, it’s cyclical. So I just destroyed any science that you can throw at me because God was first. God created science. God created the universe. I’m betting you will tell me God is a make-believe character for the weak to believe in. And I’m ready for it. All of you Scientology intellectuals who think you know everything don’t believe in God. You are crushed by your own wisdom. Yet you parish for your lack of knowledge. The Bible addressed it as well. So come back with something more foundational than any of that. I’ve read Al Gores book and everything else. The Bible is the truth. The only truth. We can’t stop climate change. Greta T can take a seat and live for a few more decades and learn something instead of shouting liberal talking points. The only reason people “pretend” to care about climate change is because there’s hundreds of billions and trillions of dollars for them to profit a little off of. It’s a massive redistribution of wrath strategy. Biden will be dead, HRC and Obama and Gore will be dead before they see their plans born out. AOC and Greta will probably still be alive in 50 years God help us all. Okay Michael you can drop the hammer on me now. I’ve thrown my pearls at the swine.
Doesn't look like a truck to me. Looks like a car..... Maybe a modern El Camino.
I really don’t know who this is for.
This is a Baja
Claim your "here within 1 hour" ticket 🎫
🙋♂️
cool SUV, shame its only 6.2sec 0-60mph with that turbo, even my old 2011 Toyota Rav4 V6 awd gets 0-60 in 6sec and its 10 years old, i guess to get anything faster I'll need to get a German car =( & German price
Good review Doug’s aged poorly
Mpg 19-27 🧐
It's just a regular truck
Fuel economy is never Kia’s Forte (or Hyundai’s). That’s an Alex on Autos joke.
The problem with both the Maverick and the Santa Cruz is that they both have GDI turbos which effectively means these are 120k miles max vehicles. The dual clutch auto will also be problematic long term.
I just don’t see much of a reason to buy these over a tacoma sr5, Colorado, frontier etc.
i have a 2015 fusion with the 2.0 eco, the same engine in the maverick. i have 154k miles on it. drives like a champ still. if you take care of them, they will last.
@@ZACH_95_ unfortunately they won’t have nearly the lifespan of comparable naturally aspirated vehicles. You have a 2015 which is is 6-7 years old depending on when it was built.
I assume most of those miles are highway miles considering the age of the car and the mileage. I’m guessing you might get another year or two before a turbo needs to be replaced or an engine rebuild is needed.
For a lot of people 160,000 miles is enough, and the extra power of the turbo is worth it. Taking care of them well definitely enhance their lifespan, just don’t expect the same life you’ll get out of Camry. The same thing can be said with trucks, the eco boost f150s are already having problems, they wear out quicker, just how it goes.
Tacoma's are overrated. Dated and cramped inside. I like AWD so I have traction all the time, as it rains a lot where I live. Pushing a button on/off repeatedly when traction is needed is a PITA.
@@OMGWTFLOLSMH They are cramped for tall guys (I’m 6’5). For most people though they have plenty of room, and there is no other midsize or compact on the market that can consistently make it over 200k with basic maintenance. They are real truck, not an iPhone on wheels. I’m a big fan of rewarding companies for quality and reliability.. this is because almost every other item I buy these days breaks in 5-6 years and I need a new one.
@@thomas735
Sexiest bakkie in the whole world
It's surprisingly good looking... I'd get this over the Maverick
Cowboy Bebop Ending Theme guitar ua-cam.com/video/f6M-oWsRE9Q/v-deo.html
King of Fighters XV Krizalid's boss stage theme ua-cam.com/video/Hp7THmIQiXk/v-deo.html
I'll pass