King James Bible | From Script to Scripture: The History of the Bible
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- We’re excited to share the opening of a special exhibit on January 15 in the Lynn H. Wood Archaeological Museum: “From Script to Scripture: The History of the Bible.” To find out more and plan your visit, go to sau.is/archaeology.
This new exhibit-never before displayed publicly-will feature rare, original Bibles including a copy of the 1611 King James Version, the Vulgate, and a translation by Martin Luther. The exhibit will explore the history of the alphabet, the transition from scrolls to books, and the role of the written word-particularly the Bible-during the period of the Reformation and beyond.
In this video, the museum’s curator, Michael G. Hasel, PhD, previews a first edition King James Version Bible, which will be on display. It was published in England in 1611 and is one of only 160 complete first edition King James Version Bibles available today.
Background music overpowered the narrative.... 😒
Wow! that's a genuine piece of Church history! Wish I could see that in person
KJVAV1611 > All other Bibles
Fact: If the new versions were designed intentionally to make it “Easier” to understand the Bible, then why did they...
•remove so many verses (100-200+)
•give Satan, the Title that was given to Jesus
•call Joseph, to be the Father of Jesus
The Answer: They wanted to © Copyright their own “words” for the money.
Psalms 12:7
“Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”
Amen brother!!
Preach it!!!!!
Thanks for sharing! Interesting facts about the King James Bible ua-cam.com/video/R9flrGw8294/v-deo.html
@@TT-hm7le
I want to clarify, this is not to come across as aggressive.
1. "Mostly added later" does not mean entirely, and is based on assumption. "not found in majority byzantine manuscripts", if so, this does not mean certain words do or do not belong there or here.
2. "The original text". No one has proven to have the original text of any ancient text. To use phrases such as "original", is dishonest.
3. Joseph is not the Father of Jesus, however, he is the parent in the sense of law. Mary is the mother of Jesus, and is the parent in the sense of law and literal or biologically.
4. This is to assume we have the original text to compare to, yet we do not. This goes both ways regarding assumption or faith of what the word should be.
Many people tell me that the early Modern English in the Authorized Version is a hindrance. I tell them that if they allow that to be a stumbling block, then they're going to have a real hard time grasping the theology in scripture.
Amen! Thank you.
It was Scripture the moment it was written down
Amazing!
Very cool
Thank you for this beautiful edition. Is God’s name really Yahweh and not Yehovah? My KJVs publish it in English as Jehovah. E.g. Psalm 83. God Bess you Bill. Uk
when i was 5 i drew in a bible similar to this one with crayons, yea i got a good hiding for that
I have a reprint of the av but I don't get what it says, because I am not good at english. hahahae.
Standard practice is to NOT wear gloves when handling antiquarian books, particularly in turning the pages.
Do you have any provable, fact-based evidence of anything spiritual in the bible?
And by "evidence" I mean, NOT any hearsay, feelings, faith, beliefs, hopes, coincidences or bible stories written by man.
This my second post, someone doesn’t like the truth, or wants anyone else to know either! The Hebrew of OT, and the Greek of the NT are mathematical languages in their nature. It is mathematically impossible for anyone to have written any part of the Bible apart from God! In the same fashion, to show you that God did inspire the translation of the KJB. There is a video that shows how the KJB is mathematically perfect. I will post it separately when you respond since someone doesn’t like the truth!
ua-cam.com/users/shorts3xhdwGDnoYg?feature=share
@@claytonsmith6148 I' have noticed that many can find within the Bible anything they look for - whether based on numerology or paranoia. Of course God is instrumental in writers' pursuit - obviously inspirational but I suppose -as usual- there is no fact-based evidence to add to the mix. Sadly, the simple query that I asked for has never been answered.
@@darz3829 If someone presented you with provable fact-based evidence, would you become a Christian?
@@KevinHammond1 "If someone presented you with provable fact-based evidence, would you become a Christian?"
Perhaps. But I know for sure that if they didn't find any evidence I would never become one just because sheeple say I should.
Cut the garbage music please .
The KJV is one of the worst bibles along with the New world. Satan is called the great deceiver and has like 30% of the religious world believing the worst bible is the best , Unbelievable.
Another heretic !!!
I'll stick with my Douay-Rheims Bible which was translated from the original Latin Vulgate Bible from the Catholic Church in the year 382.
the DR english translation of the old testament was completed 1610 in and the new testment in 1582
@CellularEarthReality-kw7pq
Lol
That poor exegesis of Matthew 23:9 has been refuted a million times. Even when I was Protestant, I never believed your poor interpret.
Paul calls himself a father
1 Corinthians 4:14-15 (D-R): I write not these things to confound you: but I admonish you as my dearest children.
15 For if you have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet not many fathers. For in Christ Jesus, by the gospel, I have begotten you.
Calling Timothy his son so he is calling himself Timothy's father
1 Timothy 1:2 (D-R): To Timothy, his beloved son in faith.
Paul ordained priests so he was a bishop
Titus 1:5 (D-R): For this cause I left thee in Crete: that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting and shouldest ordain priests in every city, as I also appointed thee:
www.catholic.com/tract/call-no-man-father
@CellularEarthReality-kw7pq
That's another you MISINTERPRET.
Scripture is clear. Authority rests with the Church not some book that the Church compiled. You follow a book with your interpretation and I follow Jesus Christ and His interpretation. So I'm good. Those who go deep in Scripture and history become Catholic. Thousands of former Protestant ministers have converted to Catholicism, some were biblical scholars. Without the Catholic Church, it's just one person's opinion against another. And we know what Jesus said to do. Matthew 18:17 to listen to the Church.