Pearson: "Absolute immunity" ruling is a king-making argument

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
  • Legal analyst Dr. Tracy Pearson joins Jim on "The Final 5" to discuss Monday's landmark Supreme Court ruling on Donald Trump's immunity, and the impact it has on his felony conviction in New York.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    STAY CONNECTED AND STAY AHEAD WITH FOX 5 DC
    Subscribe to FOX 5 DC on UA-cam » ua-cam.com/users/ch...
    Read the latest local and national news on fox5dc.com » fox5dc.com/
    Watch FOX 5 DC programming live » fox5dc.com/live
    Get your local forecast from the FOX 5 DC Weather team » www.fox5dc.com...
    Learn how to follow us on social media, download our news and weather mobile apps, find us on your Smart TV and sign up for our daily newsletter » fox5dc.com/con...
    Follow FOX 5 DC on Facebook » / fox5dc
    Follow FOX 5 DC on Twitter » / fox5dc
    Follow FOX 5 DC Instagram » / fox5dc
    Vote in the daily FOX 5 DC InstaPoll » fox5dc.com/ins...
    FOX 5 DC, WTTG-TV and FOX 5 PLUS, WDCA-TV are owned-and-operated TV stations of the Fox Broadcasting Company. We are located in Washington, D.C. and serves the entire Washington metropolitan area (including Northern Virginia, Maryland, and the Martinsburg, West Virginia area). Our studio is based in Bethesda, Maryland.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4

  • @LaymanLawBot
    @LaymanLawBot 2 місяці тому +1

    The Supreme Court recently ruled on Trump v. United States, a case involving the indictment of former President Donald Trump for actions related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. The Court emphasized that while a President has some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts, this immunity is not absolute and must be carefully assessed to avoid hindering the President's constitutional duties. The decision grants Trump presumptive immunity for his official acts, with lower courts tasked to determine which actions fall under this immunity. The dissent, led by Justice Sotomayor and joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, strongly opposes the majority's decision, arguing that it places former Presidents above the law and lacks historical and logical support.
    Presumptive immunity: A legal assumption that a person is immune from prosecution unless proven otherwise.