What if KSP - N1-L3 Soviet Moon Rocket - Making History Up

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 жов 2024
  • What if KSP is my new side Series to Space Race KSP were we will explore failed spacecraft and rockets and concept missions.
    The N1 was a super heavy-lift launch vehicle intended to deliver payloads beyond low Earth orbit. Its first stage remains the most powerful rocket stage ever built, but all of the four flown N1 first stages failed and the project was abandoned. Lots of rocket parts were literally converted into animal pens but fortunately lots of its closed cycled engines were saved from scrap and have since been retro fitted into successful launch systems.
    Since the N1-L3 was my most requested video and it's the Soviet counterpart of Apollo 11 (which was so my last video) it was a no brainier to start here. I have also not started on the next craft in this series which gives you guys an opportunity to comment which space craft or concept mission you would like to see.
    Even though the N1 was a little smaller than the Saturn V this turned out to be my largest single launch craft file ever, being the first to be taller than the VAB.
    Do join our discord's research channel if you would like to see what my current project is and how much progress has been made.
    Craft Files:
    -www.curseforge...
    Wiki:
    en.wikipedia.o...)
    The main site I used to make this craft file.
    www.russianspac...
    Kerbal Space Program:
    The game Kerbal Space program was created by Squad please take the time to visit their website for more information on this game.
    KSP official website - kerbalspacepro...
    Music:
    Revolutions by Savfk
    Download this track - • Revolutions by Savfk (...
    Creative Commons License -creativecommon...
    GameplayReviewUK:
    I make all sorts of videos and that so if you enjoyed this then please do Like, Follow & Subscribe
    Store - teespring.com/...
    Discord - / discord
    Twitter - / gameplay_review
    Facebook - / gameplayreviewuk
    Instagram - / gameplayreviewuk
    Patreon - / gameplayreviewuk

КОМЕНТАРІ • 289

  • @Gordon_Workshop
    @Gordon_Workshop 5 років тому +314

    Historical accuracy 10/10

    • @peter229
      @peter229 4 роки тому +3

      Wasn't that two N-1F with new control core was ready after four failure ? So it's 6/10 i guess

    • @owensharp4891
      @owensharp4891 4 роки тому +3

      Besides the whole “N-1 exploding before getting to space” part, it was accurate.

    • @raine8553
      @raine8553 4 роки тому +1

      crashing rating: 8294738926863836863836863836 / 10

    • @mlovmo
      @mlovmo 4 роки тому

      Especially the cutesy big-headed cosmonaut crawling outside to get into the LEM.

    • @TTGLKami
      @TTGLKami 4 роки тому +1

      @Hal 9000 r/whooosh

  • @twistedyogert
    @twistedyogert 5 років тому +217

    Wish the Soviets had gotten the N1 working reliably because then there could've been an Apollo-Soyuz test in Lunar orbit and perhaps joint Soviet-American missions.

    • @AvoxionYT
      @AvoxionYT 4 роки тому +26

      It is quite a wonder to imagine what the world would have been had the Soviet Union not collapse and invest in it's space program more.

    • @topsecret1837
      @topsecret1837 4 роки тому +12

      twistedyogert + Avoxion
      Frankly America was overly dramatic and paranoid at the pretense of Soviet ICBMs and television at the time made things worse for American families. Anti communism politics really killed any alliances with the Soviet Union. As far as I know the possibility of such an alliance would have allowed America to adjust our policies towards the idea of sharing the wealth as much as we try to share power via democracy, but first we would have to prove that certain things like guns and gas are not necessities in our culture but pleasures that kill anyone’s sense of future by not sharing the world for others, to “steal” other’s rights to this country you could say.
      I guess you could also say President Trump is the final wall and pinnacle of those beliefs that certain things which have caused harm to other are nothing more than taken for granted, and in fact are a right. But they’re a Market of Addiction, and the rights are excuses to have something that causes tragedy no matter what happens.
      So I guess when America reckons we can love what we really need in our lives, that can allow some aspects of what that alliance would’ve been to come back.

    • @AvoxionYT
      @AvoxionYT 4 роки тому +3

      @@topsecret1837 Yeah I know it could have basically never happened it was never what my comment was around.. Could have saved yourself the time to write that

    • @alexaga3247
      @alexaga3247 4 роки тому +8

      @@topsecret1837 The target of Red USSR is Red World Communistic Revolution. Main stages of this revolution are :
      USSR
      USSRW - USSR of World
      UCRW - Union of Communistic Republics of World
      CR - Communistic Republic
      Therefore your loved "alliances with the Soviet Union" are possible if you want all world to be red and you are ready to work in red labor camps.
      Lenyou comrade !

    • @BusinessMudkip
      @BusinessMudkip 4 роки тому

      Yeah

  • @samsignorelli
    @samsignorelli 4 роки тому +72

    The ghost of Korolev smiles at this.
    What scares me is the need for a spacewalk transfer between crew module and the lander. Easy enough when the stack was together prior to landing....but getting back when there was no docking??? THAT would be the scariest part of the mission for me.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  4 роки тому +20

      The original spacecraft would have had a grappling claw, then later models had docking ports but I think even then they intended to EVA across. hence Alexei Leonov was top choice

    • @KarolOfGutovo
      @KarolOfGutovo 3 роки тому +7

      There would have been docking. A ball would have been on the tipp top of LOK Soyuz, which would fit into one of many holes on a plate on LK.

    • @badcornflakes6374
      @badcornflakes6374 3 роки тому +1

      Russian's are something else

  • @3ctjhseolere
    @3ctjhseolere 5 років тому +89

    I wonder what's next. Some ideas for the future:
    The ambitious proposals of the Apollo Applications Program.
    Direct ascent landing proposal for Apollo (and the Soviets).
    The cheap and massive Sea Dragon rocket.
    The Constellation program.
    And many more...

    • @user-bk3ik5ls2g
      @user-bk3ik5ls2g 5 років тому +4

      And the newest what if chandryaan 2 was launched on 15 July

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +2

      Ultimately I want to make videos about how I propose we colonise space but that's still in the distant future.

    • @user-bk3ik5ls2g
      @user-bk3ik5ls2g 5 років тому

      @@GameplayReviewUK ok but if you want more info you can search on internet

    • @jsythereeighty-niner2882
      @jsythereeighty-niner2882 5 років тому

      What about the Buran? The russian space shuttle.

  • @TheJoeSwanon
    @TheJoeSwanon 5 років тому +76

    This makes me think of the scene in the movie Apollo 18 when they find the abandoned Soviet lander 😟

    • @apiix9519
      @apiix9519 4 роки тому +5

      True

    • @icelandic6578
      @icelandic6578 3 роки тому +4

      Moon. S p i d e r s

    • @astroaaron855
      @astroaaron855 3 роки тому +2

      @@icelandic6578 plot twist: the crew in the movie we’re the first moon spider men

  • @gabrielchanel4448
    @gabrielchanel4448 3 роки тому +25

    Engineers: "so how many stages you want for your moon rocket?"
    Soviet union: *y e s*

    • @rbxless
      @rbxless 3 роки тому +4

      Engineers: "and how many for the lander?"
      *n o*

  • @dikorivanto
    @dikorivanto 5 років тому +22

    The amount of detail even with stock i-

  • @greenboyyyy5219
    @greenboyyyy5219 5 років тому +12

    This is the best stock ksp recreation of N1 rocket that I ever seen. That's awesome! I looking forward to more similar videos

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +1

      Thanks :) wanted the use the N1 for some more what if KSP later so keep an eye out.

  • @spaceenthusiast7160
    @spaceenthusiast7160 5 років тому +114

    Make the Sea Dragon next maybe?

    • @FQP-7024
      @FQP-7024 5 років тому +1

      Yup I agree a sea dragon would be just the top of all in ksp even if there where and still will be bigger rockets the sea dragon is my favorite.

    • @negativemaster2636
      @negativemaster2636 5 років тому +2

      Hmmm thats big

    • @Thumbsupurbum
      @Thumbsupurbum 5 років тому +2

      Launching from the water may be a problem though.

    • @FQP-7024
      @FQP-7024 5 років тому +2

      @@Thumbsupurbum but if he makes like a makeshift raft that sinks like a sub it might as well work just decouple and there you go

    • @Thumbsupurbum
      @Thumbsupurbum 5 років тому +1

      Fernando Queiroz Popovic I tried making a submarine once in KSP. The underwater physics don't really exist in game, and moving around under water is quite difficult. There's no buoyancy, it's more like Jool's atmosphere or something. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it wouldn't be as straightforward as some may think.

  • @kman2747
    @kman2747 5 років тому +12

    Amazing video! The N1 is always a very interesting rocket

  • @spaceflighthistory5362
    @spaceflighthistory5362 4 роки тому +5

    Amazing work. I have never seen a better fully stock N1 rocket in KSP!

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  4 роки тому

      Maybe this one :) ua-cam.com/video/dZyeIqelNWM/v-deo.html

  • @mas1in428
    @mas1in428 5 років тому +15

    Это божественно! As always very cool work!

  • @sheldonleecooper6970
    @sheldonleecooper6970 4 роки тому +40

    Just as Neil Armstrong was about to step on the moon and say his quote, a stubby green guy places a Russian flag on the surface.

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 4 роки тому +4

      No way, Sheldon. Buzz Aldrin would’ve punched that little green commie back into space!

    • @sheldonleecooper6970
      @sheldonleecooper6970 4 роки тому +3

      @@jacksons1010 True

    • @Charles-fc9gi
      @Charles-fc9gi 4 роки тому +3

      *USSR flag

    • @criogenic1839
      @criogenic1839 4 роки тому +1

      And after that fight, sudenly hears a war sound... *GUTEN TAG*
      P.D Sorry for my bad english

    • @0x777
      @0x777 4 роки тому +2

      @@criogenic1839 And Neal Armstrong stepped out of his capsule and right onto a towel. "Dammit", he said, "The Germans are already here".

  • @ильяФадеев-н1с
    @ильяФадеев-н1с 5 років тому +19

    It was really awesome. Best your replica, as for me

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому

      Thanks again mate :)

    • @seansargeant7966
      @seansargeant7966 5 років тому

      I saw in the chat replay that you mentioned that the LK and Soyuz should dock, and I'm pretty sure you're right. From memory, they used the Kontakt system, which had no tunnel through the port, so they had to spacewalk.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому

      Yes they would have had a grab like docking mechanism and may have later upgraded to a nice docking port. I figured maybe the first mission may have had to skip the procedure.

  • @GameplayReviewUK
    @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +5

    Do leave a comment for what you think the next episode should be, if someone has already commented, please leave them a like.

    • @night_aviation
      @night_aviation 5 років тому +5

      Vodka rocket

    • @seansargeant7966
      @seansargeant7966 5 років тому +3

      First off, amazing Soyuz LOK craft. Love the LK aesthetic as well.
      As for the suggestions, an LK-700 would be interesting. Maybe a Von Braun style nuclear Mars mission? EMPIRE? The Ares mission from Voyage would be truly epic. So much never funded...

    • @lipo8426
      @lipo8426 5 років тому +1

      Apollo applications

    • @FQP-7024
      @FQP-7024 5 років тому +3

      Why don't we try the sea dragon that would be just amazing to see a spacecraft that was designed long before apollo even started. 😅👍

    • @Rolhenw
      @Rolhenw 3 роки тому

      Do a Nazi Space Program with the plans for the modified V2 Rocket xD

  • @jasu5650
    @jasu5650 3 роки тому +2

    This made my PC almost catch on fire, insane detail.

  • @vapsa56
    @vapsa56 4 роки тому +4

    6 stages, 2 space walks and a lunar landing. Wow, that was complicated to say the least.

  • @maksstar9317
    @maksstar9317 5 років тому +15

    Отличная работа, товарищ! )

    • @egor_l.
      @egor_l. 4 роки тому +2

      Ещё русский

    • @alexaga3247
      @alexaga3247 4 роки тому +2

      Спасилен товарищ !

    • @СмитШмитт
      @СмитШмитт 4 роки тому +1

      Служу Советскому Союзу!

    • @flexo-top
      @flexo-top 3 роки тому

      😆😂🤣👍👏 30 лет Союза нет, а ты все служишь....упертый 😁

  • @GremlinRider
    @GremlinRider 5 років тому +3

    That was awesome!. Seriously good job mate!

  • @LeonardoDaVinci01
    @LeonardoDaVinci01 5 років тому +4

    You should do the constellation program next! Amazing vid as always, super realistic!

  • @nicholas-ewing
    @nicholas-ewing 5 років тому +2

    Amazing job and amazing work making the rocket! Must not be to hard because the thing looks like it was designed in KSP to begin with.

  • @spaceguy9025
    @spaceguy9025 5 років тому +6

    Its sooooooo stable!

  • @HAMMER1207
    @HAMMER1207 5 років тому +5

    Красава!!! Респект!!! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @tranzitbusdriver7456
    @tranzitbusdriver7456 5 років тому +42

    It would be cool if you crashed it like the real thing, because explosions

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +24

      It was already running at 5 FPS I was worried an explosion would burn a hole in my mother board.

    • @Fred_the_1996
      @Fred_the_1996 4 роки тому +2

      @@GameplayReviewUK lol ksp optimization is awful

    • @tech_of_steel20official
      @tech_of_steel20official 4 роки тому +1

      I run ksp pretty good on my core 2 duo E4500 (btw it runs at 2.2GHz but 3 GHz is recommended for gaming lol)

  • @kauroplive
    @kauroplive 5 років тому +1

    Nice creation sir

  • @Warriorking.1963
    @Warriorking.1963 5 років тому +17

    This was really good, the rocket looked fantastic.
    I'm not an expert on space flight and no criticism intended, but why did you not dock the lander with the spacecraft in orbit after leaving the Mun? In real life there was a single use docking port which would have been used when the two craft rendezvoused in Lunar orbit, to facilitate the transfer of any samples, etc the returning cosmonaut would have collected for returning to Earth.
    As far as I know, and as I've said already, it was only a single use docking system, the act of using it would have smashed it, making it inoperable, which would have been interesting for the crew, hoping that the thing would release when the time to jettison the lander arrived as they prepared to return home.
    You may or may not know this, but the Soviet lander may yet make it to the moon, apparently the Chinese have been in talks with Moscow, hoping they will provide them with the plans for the spacecraft.
    Like I said though, really great video, you really nailed how the whole Soviet package would have looked.

    • @BusinessMudkip
      @BusinessMudkip 4 роки тому

      Well the n1 lander was incased in a fairing not actually docked to the Soyuz

    • @Warriorking.1963
      @Warriorking.1963 4 роки тому +2

      @@BusinessMudkip That is true, but it was also fitted with a very basic docking system so it could link up with the Soyuz when it returned from the surface of the moon. This was probably to keep both vessels stable in relation to each other while the cosmonaut transferred his samples over to the Soyuz before returning home.

  • @captainramius5047
    @captainramius5047 2 роки тому

    I love this rocket, and the possible implications that could have occurred had the soviets landed upon the moon first, A fantastic job!

  • @sheldonleecooper6970
    @sheldonleecooper6970 4 роки тому +1

    NASA: we must dock the lunar module with the commander module in order for the astronauts to come back.
    SOVIET: Ah, just jump when the commander module comes.

  • @Idk-du1tt
    @Idk-du1tt 4 роки тому +5

    Too bad the Soviets abandoned the project It was a good designation of a rocket :(
    Nice vid :)

    • @BusinessMudkip
      @BusinessMudkip 4 роки тому +1

      It was because of several launch failures

    • @TheDerperado
      @TheDerperado 4 роки тому

      Abandoning the project was the only reasonable option for the Soviets as N1 was simply never going to work reliably

  • @CoderKot
    @CoderKot 5 років тому +5

    Спасибо! Продолжай дальше, клёвый контент.

  • @antonfilyushkin1371
    @antonfilyushkin1371 4 роки тому +1

    I'd note that the moment of docking of the lunar modul (LK) with Soyuz 7K (LOK) is missing in the sequence. But all other details are very cool. Thanks!

  • @pierrehrn44
    @pierrehrn44 5 років тому +2

    Good job! That was awesome

  • @fleex3099
    @fleex3099 5 років тому +1

    Beautifully made

  • @ПавелНиколаев-к3к
    @ПавелНиколаев-к3к 5 років тому +4

    Идеально!👍

    • @nickolsky
      @nickolsky 5 років тому +1

      Н-1 не предполагалось для высадки спускаемого аппарата на поверхность Луны. Н-1 должна была вывести Лунную станцию Салют-1 на орбиту Луны.

  • @rudolphreindeer7910
    @rudolphreindeer7910 Рік тому

    Very smooth touchdown❤❤❤

  • @XIndependent77
    @XIndependent77 4 роки тому +1

    This mission would be truly amazing! Still not as amazing as Apollo 11 but I could imagine them getting to the moon after Apollo 11, maybe it would be better, maybe we wouldn’t just stop going there. When we had competition after landing there. But now it’s to late we just have to hope that we get back to the moon. But the N1 Rocket is an amazing piece and the stages and how the mission was supposed to go it’s just awesome . Thank you for making this video I was really interested how the mission would actually look like.

  • @Tewemeh2ter
    @Tewemeh2ter 5 років тому +3

    Game play reviews uk, or GPRUK, I guess, could u do a video where u launch a rocket that’s a mix of the Saturn 5 and N1 please? It would be stupidly hilarious. Make the lower stage the Saturn 5, the next two stages N 1, the lander would also be N 1, but the faring containing it and the crew medial would be Saturn 5. Please do this. Call it the Saturn N 1. DO IT FOR ME!

  • @pepaselnek425
    @pepaselnek425 4 роки тому +2

    Its so real it crahed my KSP!!!

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  4 роки тому

      I think it made mine crash a couple of time too :D

  • @BlueViper8907
    @BlueViper8907 5 років тому +1

    Fantastic! 👏👏👏

  • @chrisholmes4684
    @chrisholmes4684 5 років тому +1

    That was one big piece fairing

  • @dandyrachman5555
    @dandyrachman5555 4 роки тому +1

    Its Soo satisfying

  • @FQP-7024
    @FQP-7024 5 років тому +5

    Yup this is just the best I think I'll stick with the channel for some time yeah.

    • @FQP-7024
      @FQP-7024 5 років тому

      Wow now that was quick.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +1

      Thanks for the comment :)

    • @FQP-7024
      @FQP-7024 5 років тому +4

      @@GameplayReviewUK no,thank you for the video and you know what will for sure be the better for this channel if I may say:to just make the most unknown rockets there ever where because they where or wacky or tottaly did not work and that is the good part of ksp that's why I subed right after the video was over to see a genius get to work and I'm surprised matt lowen did not comment here you are a bloody brilliant designer. Aniway good luck on the next video. 😉👍

  • @eannamcnamara9338
    @eannamcnamara9338 5 років тому +11

    Can talk about how the lander is called the lunniy KORABL lander

    • @space__idklmao
      @space__idklmao 5 років тому +4

      Eanna McNamara Russian for lunar craft. That’s really it.

    • @mariasirona1622
      @mariasirona1622 2 роки тому

      @@space__idklmao korabl sounds similar to kerbal

  • @exospaceman8209
    @exospaceman8209 5 років тому +1

    Nice one mate :D, I made my own last year but never tested it

  • @ErikCrayzer
    @ErikCrayzer 3 роки тому +1

    Как всегда Великолепнейшая работа

  • @victorlux9651
    @victorlux9651 5 років тому +5

    Очень жаль что мы так и не полетели на Луну! Слишком рано были брошены работы по Н-1. Ну и что, что американци высадились первыми, ну и что, что наша ракета взрывалась, надо было дальше продолжать работать, пока ракета не была бы доведена до ума, к тому же последний запуск прошел лучше чем три педидущих, а лунный модуль был вообще готов

    • @Andrey_Drone
      @Andrey_Drone 5 років тому +4

      Victor Lux нужно было использовать схему со сборкой лунного корабля на орбите за несколько пусков ракеты протон, а не тратить колоссальные ресурсы на эту гигантскую н1. Стыковку освоить было проще, особенно если повысить роль космонавтов в этом процессе.

    • @spinningsquare1325
      @spinningsquare1325 4 роки тому +2

      @@Andrey_Drone однопусковая схема очень сооблазнительна.

  • @nuslixx3352
    @nuslixx3352 3 роки тому +1

    amazing

  • @adarsh4764
    @adarsh4764 4 роки тому

    0:14 And this is where u find the moon rock crabs!

  • @avestite
    @avestite 2 роки тому +2

    "I take this step for my country, for my people, and for the Marxist-Leninist way of life. Knowing that today is but one small step on a journey that someday will take us all to the stars."

    • @pedrocaldas785
      @pedrocaldas785 Місяць тому

      For all makind ou era a frase de verdade?

  • @FLUPPY_officiel
    @FLUPPY_officiel 4 роки тому +1

    красиво сделал! я аж прослезился!

  • @redactedagentdataexpunged9431
    @redactedagentdataexpunged9431 5 років тому +2

    Wow

  • @wowzar4773
    @wowzar4773 5 років тому +3

    Perhaps try to make the Gemini direct assent craft and the LK-700 (edit wrong number 😂)

  • @randomkerbal
    @randomkerbal 5 років тому +2

    10/10

  • @jsythereeighty-niner2882
    @jsythereeighty-niner2882 5 років тому +1

    You should make a short video on the 2009 satellite collision, which happened when a Russian Kosmos satellite and an American Iridium satellite collided above the Arctic Sea.

  • @four-dimensionalperson
    @four-dimensionalperson 5 років тому +2

    Чудо что это махина хоть смогла оторваться от земли ,
    Слишком усложненная конструкция , даже сегодня запуск 27 двигателей Falcon Heavy это крайне сложная задача , что уж говорить про электронику того времени ,
    США правильно решили что 5 двигателей лучше чем 30 , меньше шансов что что-то сломается , а также легче следить за ними а компьютерам управлять им особенно с тогдашними компами ,
    Да и в целом Сатурн более простая если сравнить ,
    А главное правила инженера ,
    Чем проще тем лучше .

    • @archibaldo
      @archibaldo 5 років тому +1

      почему сатурны не взрывались, потому что их поэтапно делали, ступень за ступенем. Каждый ступень запускали отдельно и пока не доводились до ума следующие не делали. А Н-1 построили зразу полностью и на старт, еще очень торопили советские власти чтоб опередить американцев. Итог все взорвались на старте

    • @four-dimensionalperson
      @four-dimensionalperson 5 років тому

      @@archibaldo СССР даже не проверяли двигатели , не проводили прожиг на стенде ,
      Да и вряд ли она поднялась бы на орбиту , слишком хлипкая , много слабых мест и слишком тяжёлая .
      Но 3 основные проблемы это резонанс , двигатели и электроника которая была слишком слабой что бы управлять одновременно таким количеством двигателей и систем .
      В итоге лунную программу СССР погубило тяга СССР к гигантизму , политика была чем больше тем лучше .
      Даже энергия буран постиг ту же судьбу , никому не нужна такая ракета , она грузоподьемной была но грузов для неё не было , буран понятно списали из за ненужности ,
      В целом СССР по этому и погиб , любовь к гигантизму , вкладывал ресурсы в огромные и в большинстве случаях не нужных проектов .

    • @virtuality_reality42
      @virtuality_reality42 4 роки тому

      @@four-dimensionalperson ну по крайней мере хоть что-то делали в отличие от Роскосмоса,как Рогозин пришел так ничего путного не делали больше до сих пор летают на дедовских технологиях новых ракет нет.Россия скоро потеряет статус космической сверхдержавы а на место ей придут spacex и nasa.

    • @four-dimensionalperson
      @four-dimensionalperson 4 роки тому

      @@virtuality_reality42 достижения никто не отменяет их было много , но с 91 года когда образовалась страна РФ не было сделано ничего ,
      Ну кроме дэбильной ангары которая является полной копией протона но даже несмотря на это её до сих пор не могут заставить нормально летать , а с прошло уже почти 30 лет с тех пор как началось строительство , .
      Вот так и летаем на гагаринских Р-7 только "модернизированные" .

    • @virtuality_reality42
      @virtuality_reality42 4 роки тому

      @@four-dimensionalperson это точно

  • @apollon_3rocket
    @apollon_3rocket 2 місяці тому

    excellent

  • @quantumx9729
    @quantumx9729 5 років тому +2

    *FINALLY*

  • @rockfall4176
    @rockfall4176 5 років тому +1

    Nice video :)

  • @aymeneee8430
    @aymeneee8430 5 років тому +1

    Nice

  • @Reimstransport51
    @Reimstransport51 5 років тому +1

    Cool

  • @SCPContainmentBreach264
    @SCPContainmentBreach264 7 місяців тому +1

    I wish countries would do joint space missions instead of using trillions of dollars trying to kill each other.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  7 місяців тому +1

      same 😅

    • @ireneuszpyc6684
      @ireneuszpyc6684 2 місяці тому

      @@GameplayReviewUK
      you show the returning capsule landing on land: wouldn't it land in the ocean instead?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  2 місяці тому +1

      @@ireneuszpyc6684 A Soyuz derived capsule usually aims for land but they are capable of landing in water too

  • @geizadireito1162
    @geizadireito1162 4 роки тому

    It would be extremely dangerous this mission. Very complex and the necessity of riding around the space for two times by the cosmonaut shows insanity and almost a suicide

  • @mikeksp9177
    @mikeksp9177 5 років тому +1

    nice

  • @mikhailiagacesa3406
    @mikhailiagacesa3406 2 роки тому +1

    During launch; did you put those Auroras' in the background on purpose? 'Cause they pretty.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  2 роки тому +1

      I try to take a semi realistic trajectory and make the most of the view, in this case we got to see the auroras ;)

    • @mikhailiagacesa3406
      @mikhailiagacesa3406 2 роки тому

      @@GameplayReviewUK sweet!

  • @VelkyKrtkusofitzl
    @VelkyKrtkusofitzl 5 років тому +3

    👍👍🎖🎖😊

  • @mikhailgeocentr7787
    @mikhailgeocentr7787 5 років тому +1

    This is the best vidio

  • @akthewareagle8595
    @akthewareagle8595 5 років тому

    Shame you didn’t show the building process. Would have liked to make my own

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому

      The amount of time this took it would have taken a whole series to show the building process.

  • @carttonw5010
    @carttonw5010 4 роки тому

    dude you and a great hero 🤣

  • @TrayTerra
    @TrayTerra 5 років тому +1

    Blyatiful 😢 👏

  • @6d-21yeungpinghei6
    @6d-21yeungpinghei6 4 роки тому

    i can only give 9.9/10

  • @LeonidSaykin
    @LeonidSaykin 5 років тому +2

    OMG.The unholy rocket!
    Did it also blew up on the launch pad about three times?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому

      Belive it or not. Yes it did :)

    • @spaceflighthistory5362
      @spaceflighthistory5362 4 роки тому

      Only one rocket fell back on the Launch pad. It happened on July 1969, days before the official Apollo 11 manned moon landing attempt. Seconds after the launch the system KROD shut down all of the engines due to a fire on engine NO.8. The rest fell back or exploded before/after the impact on the ground miles away from the launch pads. The fifth and sixth N1 were both ready. At that time they truly believed that it could work. Both of the rockets went under some serious developments and improvements. Unfortunately the programme was abandoned before the scheduled launches.

    • @mariasirona1622
      @mariasirona1622 3 роки тому

      @@spaceflighthistory5362 KORD

  • @user-zk5td6px6d
    @user-zk5td6px6d 4 роки тому

    If you would have used all delta V then I’m guessing you could probably have gone to Duna, Ike and back.

  • @nickolsky
    @nickolsky 5 років тому +3

    Н-1 не предполагалось для высадки спускаемого аппарата на поверхность Луны.
    Н-1 должна была вывести Лунную станцию Салют на орбиту Луны.

  • @ОлексйФоменко
    @ОлексйФоменко 5 років тому +1

    круть! спс.

  • @sfsspearheadorbital5195
    @sfsspearheadorbital5195 3 роки тому

    Imagine Lunniy korabl and Apollo LM both land near each other at the same time...........

  • @jarediannudalo6074
    @jarediannudalo6074 5 років тому

    after lifting off from the moon Cosmonauts planned to exit their vehicle and space walk to the other one ? 🤯

  • @fractalelf7760
    @fractalelf7760 5 років тому +1

    I really dig these replica vehicles from the series, are they available somewhere as shareables?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +1

      Yes :) www.curseforge.com/kerbal/shareables/space-race-ksp/files

  • @hwce6528
    @hwce6528 4 роки тому +2

    Adam please may you do MHE explorer programe like you did with the ranger programe or please may you do MHE or breaking grounds ISS
    Is you agree I can't wait to see your design's 🙂

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  4 роки тому +1

      I've built a 1:1 breaking ground ISS for Demo 2 video :)

    • @hwce6528
      @hwce6528 4 роки тому

      @@GameplayReviewUK oh then can you do all mission to the moon like when u did it with all mission to mars
      the for listening 🙂

  • @adamspuful
    @adamspuful 4 роки тому

    😱😱

  • @alexispaillard8512
    @alexispaillard8512 5 років тому +1

    :OOOOO

  • @monolitonegro3981
    @monolitonegro3981 3 роки тому

    Uma pena o N1 não ter conseguido êxito em sua época

  • @ThomasHaberkorn
    @ThomasHaberkorn 5 років тому +2

    did the Soviets manage docking back in '69?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +1

      Yes Soyuz 4 & 5, I planned to do a video about it but had to skip it. I intend to come back to it.

    • @ThomasHaberkorn
      @ThomasHaberkorn 5 років тому

      @@GameplayReviewUK cool! Keep up the good work

  • @nicksalvatore5717
    @nicksalvatore5717 4 роки тому

    Does the rocket really work in practice? Would the engines need to be redesigned to not use pyrotechnic valves?

  • @cukik6325
    @cukik6325 5 років тому

    BFR to Duna next?

  • @sporkdog2474
    @sporkdog2474 4 роки тому

    How do you get it so realistic and working?

  • @exalosm
    @exalosm 5 років тому +1

    Poor block D, it was almost useless...

  • @shriramvenu
    @shriramvenu 4 роки тому

    im guessing this is not purely stock parts? i mean how did you get the re-entry module of the 7K-LOK to be the correct bell shaped one?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  4 роки тому +1

      it is stock, the shape is merely a stock fairing

  • @ZandrianEmpire-Official-
    @ZandrianEmpire-Official- 11 місяців тому +1

    What mod did you use to make the rocket?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  11 місяців тому

      none, but the making history DLC wss installed.

  • @Ethan-Sailer
    @Ethan-Sailer 5 років тому

    How do you get crafts with so many parts to run so smoothly it takes me forever to load them let alone try and get them into orbit at 10 FPS my pc isn’t the greatest but it is still decent in my opinion it just seems to have a very difficult time with KSP

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому

      Not all of it was smooth, the faring separation was 1 fps, slowest ever, that part of the video is sped up about 20 times.

  • @jsythereeighty-niner2882
    @jsythereeighty-niner2882 5 років тому +1

    Imagine the part count...

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому

      just over 1000 parts :)

    • @jsythereeighty-niner2882
      @jsythereeighty-niner2882 5 років тому

      @@GameplayReviewUK My old Dell E310, my old computer I used to play KSP, would spontaneously combust.

  • @chatterboxhistorian8502
    @chatterboxhistorian8502 4 роки тому

    What visual mods are you using???

  • @jeffreyafedi8187
    @jeffreyafedi8187 2 роки тому

    I downloaded the file for the n1 but the problem is the rocket is too heavy to liftoff. Im wondering if i could know why.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  2 роки тому

      It shouldn't be too heavy to lift off, but maybe an update since has tweaked some bits, not to worry, the craft has more fuel than required. just remove some fuel from one of the first three stages and should be fine.

  • @maxschmieder232
    @maxschmieder232 5 років тому +1

    how did you do the mun transfer from such a high inclination as a woomerang orbit?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  5 років тому +1

      Well if anything how would you do a none inclined orbit if you are pretending the Van Allen is there?
      Short answer is set the Mun as the target and do your TLI burn around the ascending/descending nodes. The apex of the orbit will intersect with the mun's orbital plane.

    • @maxschmieder232
      @maxschmieder232 5 років тому +1

      @@GameplayReviewUK hey, thanks for responding! I'm trying to challenge myself in KSP currently, so the tips should help.

  • @one_alonevanalon3458
    @one_alonevanalon3458 Рік тому

    Fact,russians were only allocated 10% of what apollo had,so they could build 10 n1s for the price of 1 apollo even if 7 of them failed it would still be better.

  • @kurtz8804
    @kurtz8804 3 роки тому

    But why does the LK not connect 7K-LOK after taking off from the moon as in life. Did you have any difficulties with the creation?

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  3 роки тому

      The first design of LK does not dock, it would latch on with a claw which I didn't add, the second design had a way for the ships to dock properly but would have still needed a spacewalk.

    • @kurtz8804
      @kurtz8804 3 роки тому

      I meant the second one.

    • @GameplayReviewUK
      @GameplayReviewUK  3 роки тому

      @@kurtz8804 in this case you would just add a jr docking port to the LOK

  • @aymeneee8430
    @aymeneee8430 5 років тому +1

    Is there a space simulation game like this but with better graphics

    • @Ethan-Sailer
      @Ethan-Sailer 5 років тому

      There’s simple rockets 2 that’s pretty good might be worth checking out I personally didn’t like KSP at first but I played a free version I got somewhere and absolutely fell in love with it

    • @GremlinRider
      @GremlinRider 5 років тому +1

      Maybe Orbiter 2016, it's free but you can't build rockets like you can in ksp. Orbiter has better graphics, it has the real solar system and and real spacecraft. ksp has a large modding community, people make mods that add better graphics, the real solar system and real spacecraft anyway.

    • @aymeneee8430
      @aymeneee8430 5 років тому +1

      @@GremlinRider ua-cam.com/video/P_nj6wW6Gsc/v-deo.html

    • @GremlinRider
      @GremlinRider 5 років тому

      @@aymeneee8430 I saw that and freaked the fuck out

  • @JerzeyBoy
    @JerzeyBoy 4 роки тому

    Apollo 18 astronaut: What the hell?

  • @benquinney2
    @benquinney2 3 роки тому

    Stuka
    Whirlwind

  • @tootiejamba
    @tootiejamba 2 роки тому

    The Russian plan called for a space walk between the Lunar lander and the Command module?? Yikes!

  • @BambiAltOfficials
    @BambiAltOfficials 2 роки тому

    мы не используем поддержку стыковки.