@@nznegativeions wow... burn in hell... what a complete hypocritical 180 Christians do when their job is to be as close to Jesus' ways of being as they can be. Isn't it the policy of Christians to turn their face the other way and accept a second slap on the other cheek when presented with contradicting forces? Just wondering how much hypocrisy will continue to flow from christianity after all the false entropy of lies begins to wane. LMAO! I'm a humanist by nature but BS puts me at attention and I have to call it out. Sorry.
‘He multiplied everything by zero, which even a grade school student knows you’re not supposed to do.’ I legit barfed up the entire contents of my breakfast and nearly choked to death.
Yes, we did miss you. I hope your commitment to fighting against the ingress of anti-scientific & unfalsifiable political rhetoric into academia hasn't changed. I am, and have been, a fan for years now and your commitment to the pursuit of facts & evidence based reasoning has been a huge influence on me.
I hope you’ll be getting back the “The New Lysenkoism” series soon! It’s by far my favorite series and has been immensely useful to me (an academic). I know graduate school is time consuming and I’ve been waiting patiently, but I suspect there are MANY people awaiting your return to that work. Cheers, thank you, and best wishes!
@@KingCrocoduck Not only is the Science Wars series much more enjoyable than creationist bashing (it's getting old tbh), it is also much more relevant. it is a much needed expose of the essentially political and anti-science foundation of the academic left, and most people have no clue just how deep that rabbit hole goes
Listening to you explain and discuss the way the world works according to these brilliant men and their incredible life's work only makes me wish I took up some form of physics when I was young. I honestly wish I knew science much deeper than I do now. It's young men like yourself that help put the "Wonder" in science to us wanna-be scientist. Thank you King Crocoduck. Sincerely. Mike Kugel, 58 years old and still in awe of science.
Thank you for returning my King! While I love all of your videos I am especially grateful for your Quantum Theory Made Easy videos. I know that I speak for a huge portion of your viewers when I ask for you to please continue making them, and hopefully releasing the third video in a short timeframe. Thank you again!
KC it's phenomenal to watch you work and to hear your explanations of physics. I hope everything with your advancements in studies is going great. Thank you for taking the time to make another video.
Glad to hear from you again! Great job dispatching more creationists, however, I would love to see your channel expand into other topics like psychology and other aspects of philosophy. Bashing noob creationists is fun, but some of us are way past that phase now.
Yes, I wonder if 'King Crocoduck' could one day do a straight science documentary on, say, the subject of entropy which is a subtle but vital concept for people to understand. I found that bit of the video fascinating.
I don't think it's really 'past that phase' so much as simple fatigue. There's nothing changing in the field. Creationists are making the same idiotic claims today that they were making ten years ago (Or in some cases, five hundred years ago), and we've heard them all already. Over, and over, and over. We all know their arguments, we all know the rebuttals. Keep bashing creationists, certainly - but the best bashing is that which also educates, so use that, and perhaps broaden a bit into other bad science. There's plenty of that around to criticize.
@@vylbird8014 True. For some reason it felt like a phase for me, there was a point I would genuinely feel excited watching creationist arguments taken apart. These days I get bored, as you said, there is nothing really new in their arguments.
Awesome video again. I had several courses on Thermodynamics myself, but yours is the best description of the second law I have ever heard. The loss of energy gradients is a nice angle to approach it.
UA-cam instantly buffered forty minutes of this video. My Internet isn't even that fast. It must be a sign. KC is Jesus confirmed. "And after three arbitrary units of time KC returned and blessed his followers with another upload."
I've noticed a lot with people like that who give "scientific" lectures "proving god", they always talk really fast through any sort of scientific information, so their unscientific/uneducated audience can't really have time to comprehend what's being said, and then they give a very poor analogy that grossly dumbs it down so the audience thinks they understand it all, when in reality there is no valid analogy and they don't understand any of it.
To paraphrase Sean Carroll, Aristotle's physics was cutting edge stuff three thousand years ago... I absolutely love it when William Lane Craig admits that God doesn't logically follow from Kalam (see The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology).
Daviyd Viljoen the paradox he creates is pretty much a so what if god doesn't follow natural laws, god is essentually whatever. But he uses natural laws to arrive to a conclusion of a god. So it still boils down to nothing more than faith, not logic. (Edit: was supposed to be "doesn't.")
Antediluvian Atheist and I'm perfectly ok with personal experience being sufficient for him, but if he wants to make an honest attempt to convince others, then he needs to be able to accept that subjective experiences can't be plead out with subjective exceptions. Bad faith or not, a bad arguement is a bad arguement.
nunya bisnass not it’s not ok. Not when he pretends that it’s rational. If he said « it’s irrational, but it’s good enough for me », I would say « if bullshit is enough for you, okay, as long as you don’t use it to proselytize ». But to say that it’s rational evidence for oneself ? Nah. And the same goes for his moral argument (« deep down we all know » that objective morality exists).
This is brilliant. I genuinely love how meticulously and accurately you break down the entire claim and don’t leave anything unaddressed. Keep it up man!
The most eloquent rebuttal to an apologist incoming @23:25 you, my friend, are a wordsmith. Another excellent video response by KC and well worth the wait.
Man by the time Quantum theory made easy part 3 will be released i will have probably finished my degree that i started in large part because of part two and one in the first place. (Not only the videos themselves but i found this channel because of those videos and this channel as a whole was a big influence on my decision)
This sermon was like what happens a lot in Sci-fi shows and movies and actually for somewhat similar reasons - to make the fiction more believable and relateable to the audience. So you might have Data giving a long explanation about how they can fire a chronoton beam into the enemy's warp core, causing a quantum cascade that will make it overload. And some like Deanna says, "Like blowing up a balloon until it pops!". This guy lays out a fictional version of science, and then dumbs even that down more to make his fiction more believable.
"You can have a beautiful garden, but if you leave it untended...it's gonna break down." That happened to me, so I took a cue from God, got angry at my garden, cursed it and then torched it with a flamethrower. That'll show those rebellious daisies!
"Science isn't like a buffet, you can't say 'oh I love me some antibodies, oh and I want to fly in a plane and oh I love my cell phone but call climate science bullshit.' Either you accept that you live in a scientific society, doesn't mean you slavishly adhere to everything that comes out of scientific journals, but either you accept the fact that the scientific method has basically produced miracles for us or like, give me the cell phone back man."
Shane Kennelty Well that's the thing with these religious nuts. They don't care about their hypocrisy in using scientific advancements to help their accomplish their aims whilst simultaneously denying the principles on which they work. Their philosophy is based on picking and choosing and not coherency.
Grinder is for honest, openly Gay adults who are generally not interested in manipulating people into having sex. It's unlikely that sexually suppressed evangelicals would have much interest in honest openness about their sexuality. Clandestine sexual promiscuity is natural for evangelicals. After all, the very foundation of their lives is based on fraud.
I've been waiting for new video for a very long time and when it finally came out, youtube didn't even notify my. (even though I have notofications on)
atheists should ask the christians this question: what caused god?? instead of tryin' in vain 2 explain 2 the christians about what caused of the universe after the christians ask what caused the universe.
It's actually pretty funny seeing content like this in our modern age. It used to be *the* big internet thing, but nowadays it seems like the world has mostly moved on. Cool to see a channel like this doing the classic "calling out all scientific illiteracy and ideological madness unilaterally"-type content, which doesn't pander to a given faction of the culture clash *too* hard, at least.
Holy crap. I grew up within spitting distance of this church. Back when it was called "Bay Area Fellowship". It was non denominational and the sermons were basically just "Everyone is welcome. Be happy, be nice to each other and don't worry too much about what it says in the book". Never woulda guessed that what started as basically a best case scenario for a christian church would turn into this. The Pastor knew how to tell a story sooo well that when he cut himself off because he was going too long people in the audience would actually boo. Now hes just rehashing Kent Hovind....
That's a top class destruction of Bill's misrepresentation of scientific discovery, carefully cherry-picked quotes and absurd conclusions. I loved the dice analogy of entropy. New sub here and looking forward to your next piece.
Since you stopped uploading videos, my dream to become a physicist had died. You, once again, has sparked the fire in me. I fuckin love you man, welcome back! LEGEND
Nice. Glad to see you back. When he brought up Ferrari being “fine tuned”, I had to laugh. A Ferrari isn’t so much “finely tuned”, but rather it requires fine tuning. It’s “tuning” is so delicate that it requires constant maintenance to perform properly. A “typical” oil change is anything but typical compared to the average car. Plus, a Ferrari is the antithesis to longevity; partially due to its “fine tuning”. The engine requires close tolerances to operate, and wear opens up those tolerances rather quickly. Essentially, a Ferrari is a good example of “fine tuning” if one is arguing for young earth creationism... But I have a feeling this guy knows as much about cars as he does about science. And with cars being my “thing”, when people use them in poor examples, I suppose you could say I get “triggered”. Lol
Also, "someone said "god", therefore god exists!", a thesis so astonishingly stupid that the only thing I find more astonishingly stupid is the audience that sat there quietly listening instead of laughing him off stage.
Hold up. We're not supposed to look back to what Newton or Darwin said, because it's antiquated and old? Yet we're supposed to refer to a BOOK WRITTEN 2,000 YEARS AGO. Somehow Darwin is so old as to be considered antiquated, but a 2,000 year old book of fairy tales and hyperbole...that isn't antiquated enough to ignore. WHAT THE FUCK?!?! Also, so stoked to see you back KC.
It’s nuts to me. Just like they now say not only is evolution a thing, the entire process happened in about 100 years after Noah’s flood from the “kinds” he had space for on the Ark. But billions of years of incremental changes? THAT is crazy talk
@@alisaurus4224 Newtonian physics is also still valid, it's just that we have a more general model, that being General relativity and Einstenian physics.
To paraphrase Bill, "do you know how old that wheel technology is? And you're still using it? We can travel through the skies since at least a century ago, that's like the day before yesterday, and you aren't flying to your workplace?"
I'm out When the first argument is "the 2nd law of thermodynamics" I realize it will be the same tired nonsense. Thanks KC for taking the time and effort to keep this type of B.S. in check.
KC:: What do you call a collaboration between King Crocoduck and Aron Ra? The Creationist Meat Grinder. Me: Correct, I would also have accepted "awesome".
The creationist causailty argument falls down when you consider that time itself came into being somehow, and causality does not exist in a universe without time.
It always escapes these guys that, even if their proofs weren't riddled with mistakes, they are proving an erstwhile creator and not their living flavor of deity.
Haven't seen this in a comment yet and I'ma bit late, but the monkey thought experiment reminded me of this: Fansworth: Well, as a man enters his 18th decade, he thinks back on the mistakes he's made in life. Amy: Like the heaps of dead monkeys? Farnsworth: Science cannot move forward without heaps!
The most common argument is that how the universe started at such a low entropy? And therefore god must have started it. That causes a problem for god in particular for being a dick, to create a universe with increasing entropy that eventually will end in a heat death. Which creationists might argue that god can fix it at any moment with his magical powers, but then why an all-powerful entity made something that constantly needs fixing? However I still need the answer for a main question about low entropy in the beginning.
This just had to be uploaded before I head to my physics mid term didn't it KC? But I'm glad to see you're back! I look forward to more of your content!
So either way I'll throw in a little bit of points here and there when it comes to the scientific things he talks about like the big bang which immediately started off with an incorrect assumption of that the Big Bang definitively shows that there was a beginning to the universe but all the big bang shows is that the current state of our universe began 13.8 billion years ago although is possible that there was a similar State before the Big Bang with a big Crush leading back into a big bang leading into a big crunch and so on and so on and it's also possible that sang before the universe makes no sense as time is required to say something came before something so acting as if anything could exist before the universe when time seems intrinsically linked to our universe's current state of existence means that you're begging the question and assuming that there definitively was a beginning and you're assuming that your God exists and was necessary when there's plenty enough theories that show that our God isn't required
I'm sure you'll say the same thing crocodile or something similar but I also just want to throw my two cents in just for any other theists here also get recommended this video again just so they can if they want engage with me here
Since the last time you uploaded I have finally started my physics degree!
@Diogenes TheDog many thanks, perhaps i will have finished by the next upload!
@@spongebobsquarepants7388 Oh, zing! Lol
Hang in there! It's worth it Spongebob.
@@brendarua01 don't worry, i definitely will be. considering moving to theoretical physics, that's the only question i have over my degree
@@spongebobsquarepants7388 You started grad school?
He has risen! Praise be!
Jesus Christ Thanks Jesus!
@@KingCrocoduck Keep doing you!
Explain the checkmark, atheists.
@@badgerbush3556 burn in hell
@@nznegativeions wow... burn in hell... what a complete hypocritical 180 Christians do when their job is to be as close to Jesus' ways of being as they can be. Isn't it the policy of Christians to turn their face the other way and accept a second slap on the other cheek when presented with contradicting forces? Just wondering how much hypocrisy will continue to flow from christianity after all the false entropy of lies begins to wane. LMAO!
I'm a humanist by nature but BS puts me at attention and I have to call it out. Sorry.
I'm a simple man. I see a KC video, I click on it
‘He multiplied everything by zero, which even a grade school student knows you’re not supposed to do.’
I legit barfed up the entire contents of my breakfast and nearly choked to death.
Yes, we did miss you.
I hope your commitment to fighting against the ingress of anti-scientific & unfalsifiable political rhetoric into academia hasn't changed. I am, and have been, a fan for years now and your commitment to the pursuit of facts & evidence based reasoning has been a huge influence on me.
Yes. Yes, we missed you. Welcome back KC!
I hope you’ll be getting back the “The New Lysenkoism” series soon! It’s by far my favorite series and has been immensely useful to me (an academic). I know graduate school is time consuming and I’ve been waiting patiently, but I suspect there are MANY people awaiting your return to that work. Cheers, thank you, and best wishes!
I'll definitely be adding to that series in the coming months. I'm glad you enjoy it
I too really enjoyed that, hope more comes soon.
@@KingCrocoduck Love love love the New Lysenkoism series. One of my absolute favourite reference videos on UA-cam. You're a gifted teacher.
@@KingCrocoduck Not only is the Science Wars series much more enjoyable than creationist bashing (it's getting old tbh), it is also much more relevant. it is a much needed expose of the essentially political and anti-science foundation of the academic left, and most people have no clue just how deep that rabbit hole goes
@@troelshansen6212 Hear hear
I absolutely adore your videos. I also study physics and your loaded dice explanation was phenomenal, simple and easily understandable.
yep...full of bias and misleading...
I can't believe it.
*THE KING IS BACK!*
Listening to you explain and discuss the way the world works according to these brilliant men and their incredible life's work only makes me wish I took up some form of physics when I was young. I honestly wish I knew science much deeper than I do now. It's young men like yourself that help put the "Wonder" in science to us wanna-be scientist. Thank you King Crocoduck. Sincerely. Mike Kugel, 58 years old and still in awe of science.
I already saw this via Aron but wanted to throw a like here to too. Great job.
Thank you for returning my King! While I love all of your videos I am especially grateful for your Quantum Theory Made Easy videos. I know that I speak for a huge portion of your viewers when I ask for you to please continue making them, and hopefully releasing the third video in a short timeframe. Thank you again!
KC it's phenomenal to watch you work and to hear your explanations of physics. I hope everything with your advancements in studies is going great. Thank you for taking the time to make another video.
Glad to hear from you again! Great job dispatching more creationists, however, I would love to see your channel expand into other topics like psychology and other aspects of philosophy. Bashing noob creationists is fun, but some of us are way past that phase now.
Yes, I wonder if 'King Crocoduck' could one day do a straight science documentary on, say, the subject of entropy which is a subtle but vital concept for people to understand. I found that bit of the video fascinating.
I don't think it's really 'past that phase' so much as simple fatigue. There's nothing changing in the field. Creationists are making the same idiotic claims today that they were making ten years ago (Or in some cases, five hundred years ago), and we've heard them all already. Over, and over, and over. We all know their arguments, we all know the rebuttals. Keep bashing creationists, certainly - but the best bashing is that which also educates, so use that, and perhaps broaden a bit into other bad science. There's plenty of that around to criticize.
@@vylbird8014 True. For some reason it felt like a phase for me, there was a point I would genuinely feel excited watching creationist arguments taken apart. These days I get bored, as you said, there is nothing really new in their arguments.
I missed your videos man!!! Glad to see you back
Awesome video again. I had several courses on Thermodynamics myself, but yours is the best description of the second law I have ever heard. The loss of energy gradients is a nice angle to approach it.
UA-cam instantly buffered forty minutes of this video. My Internet isn't even that fast. It must be a sign. KC is Jesus confirmed.
"And after three arbitrary units of time KC returned and blessed his followers with another upload."
Good to see you back man. Thanks for the video.
I randomly checked this channel and discovered the new videos. Why hadn’t I tapped the bell!!! Looking forward to it all.
I've noticed a lot with people like that who give "scientific" lectures "proving god", they always talk really fast through any sort of scientific information, so their unscientific/uneducated audience can't really have time to comprehend what's being said, and then they give a very poor analogy that grossly dumbs it down so the audience thinks they understand it all, when in reality there is no valid analogy and they don't understand any of it.
To paraphrase Sean Carroll, Aristotle's physics was cutting edge stuff three thousand years ago...
I absolutely love it when William Lane Craig admits that God doesn't logically follow from Kalam (see The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology).
Daviyd Viljoen the paradox he creates is pretty much a so what if god doesn't follow natural laws, god is essentually whatever. But he uses natural laws to arrive to a conclusion of a god. So it still boils down to nothing more than faith, not logic.
(Edit: was supposed to be "doesn't.")
@@nunyabisnass1141 Also, he argues in bad faith.
Because at the end of all the arguing, his explanation is 'faith.'
Antediluvian Atheist and I'm perfectly ok with personal experience being sufficient for him, but if he wants to make an honest attempt to convince others, then he needs to be able to accept that subjective experiences can't be plead out with subjective exceptions. Bad faith or not, a bad arguement is a bad arguement.
nunya bisnass not it’s not ok.
Not when he pretends that it’s rational. If he said « it’s irrational, but it’s good enough for me », I would say « if bullshit is enough for you, okay, as long as you don’t use it to proselytize ».
But to say that it’s rational evidence for oneself ? Nah. And the same goes for his moral argument (« deep down we all know » that objective morality exists).
This is brilliant. I genuinely love how meticulously and accurately you break down the entire claim and don’t leave anything unaddressed. Keep it up man!
The most eloquent rebuttal to an apologist incoming @23:25
you, my friend, are a wordsmith.
Another excellent video response by KC and well worth the wait.
Sees hour long video uploaded by the king.
Has to work in a half hour.
Dammit!
Glad to see you back with lots of knowledge and some slam dunking. Thanks
YAY! A King Crocoduck video. Glad to see you back.
Man by the time Quantum theory made easy part 3 will be released i will have probably finished my degree that i started in large part because of part two and one in the first place.
(Not only the videos themselves but i found this channel because of those videos and this channel as a whole was a big influence on my decision)
This sermon was like what happens a lot in Sci-fi shows and movies and actually for somewhat similar reasons - to make the fiction more believable and relateable to the audience. So you might have Data giving a long explanation about how they can fire a chronoton beam into the enemy's warp core, causing a quantum cascade that will make it overload. And some like Deanna says, "Like blowing up a balloon until it pops!". This guy lays out a fictional version of science, and then dumbs even that down more to make his fiction more believable.
Damn! It's been awhile. I'm glad you're back!
Welcome home!!!! So good to hear from you again :-D
HE LIVES!!!
Proof of life!
It's about damn time
Absolutely love your fresh technique and subscribed immediately !
I missed you so much! :D
So glad to see you back!!
"You can have a beautiful garden, but if you leave it untended...it's gonna break down."
That happened to me, so I took a cue from God, got angry at my garden, cursed it and then torched it with a flamethrower. That'll show those rebellious daisies!
ooo pesky daisies.
"Science isn't like a buffet, you can't say 'oh I love me some antibodies, oh and I want to fly in a plane and oh I love my cell phone but call climate science bullshit.' Either you accept that you live in a scientific society, doesn't mean you slavishly adhere to everything that comes out of scientific journals, but either you accept the fact that the scientific method has basically produced miracles for us or like, give me the cell phone back man."
Shane Kennelty Well that's the thing with these religious nuts. They don't care about their hypocrisy in using scientific advancements to help their accomplish their aims whilst simultaneously denying the principles on which they work. Their philosophy is based on picking and choosing and not coherency.
For some reason I read the video title as "Creationists Meet On Grinder."
Can't think why......
Hahahahahahaa
Grinder is for honest, openly Gay adults who are generally not interested in manipulating people into having sex. It's unlikely that sexually suppressed evangelicals would have much interest in honest openness about their sexuality. Clandestine sexual promiscuity is natural for evangelicals. After all, the very foundation of their lives is based on fraud.
@@davesteadman1226 Well said.
lol. i like your thinking. however bent. and your bent is okay. just point it away from me.
Probably because the implications to the gene pool would save the scientific community (and humanity) a lot of trouble.
Oh, I am so glad you're back!! This was a great video!!
The waves are obviously the result of god’s noodly appendages.
OKAY, it's another KC video.. *grabs the popcorn*
OH, it's Aron *grabs the beer*
Awesome😁 Welcome back man. Missed you!
Please keep going with the science wars! Such an important and well put together series so far. Please finish it!
Glad I stuck around, this and the quantum theory are the videos I subscribed for.
Happy International Working Women's Day!
I've been waiting for new video for a very long time and when it finally came out, youtube didn't even notify my. (even though I have notofications on)
atheists should ask the christians this question:
what caused god??
instead of tryin' in vain 2 explain 2 the christians about what caused of the universe after the christians ask what caused the universe.
It's actually pretty funny seeing content like this in our modern age. It used to be *the* big internet thing, but nowadays it seems like the world has mostly moved on. Cool to see a channel like this doing the classic "calling out all scientific illiteracy and ideological madness unilaterally"-type content, which doesn't pander to a given faction of the culture clash *too* hard, at least.
Wow, I was checking your Twitter yesterday wondering if you still existed. Happy days!!!
What did you find out? Is he still alive?
Holy crap. I grew up within spitting distance of this church. Back when it was called "Bay Area Fellowship". It was non denominational and the sermons were basically just "Everyone is welcome. Be happy, be nice to each other and don't worry too much about what it says in the book".
Never woulda guessed that what started as basically a best case scenario for a christian church would turn into this. The Pastor knew how to tell a story sooo well that when he cut himself off because he was going too long people in the audience would actually boo. Now hes just rehashing Kent Hovind....
Science is my HANGUP. lol. :) What a great opener. Yes -- we're all biased to reason and evidence. GOT ME pasture. :)
Dude!!! Great to see you back!
So happy to see you back again.
Never in the history of the human race has "we don't know" been accurately replaced with "God did it."
Glad you're back! Now if only we could revive The Living Dinosaur too
That's a top class destruction of Bill's misrepresentation of scientific discovery, carefully cherry-picked quotes and absurd conclusions. I loved the dice analogy of entropy. New sub here and looking forward to your next piece.
But crockoduck, Kano is a psychopath! ;) Welcome back, King.
AronRa is freaking great! If you collab with him? Well, here, have a new subscription and follower!
Since you stopped uploading videos, my dream to become a physicist had died. You, once again, has sparked the fire in me. I fuckin love you man, welcome back! LEGEND
Since the last time you uploaded, I finally started my physics degree and also dropped out!
36:23 **sound* of brain cells dying in a horrible and slow manner
Somebody should point this pastor to Einstein's quote "God does not play dice with the universe" just to see his head explode.
Excellent video and welcome back!
*"We all have a bias. I'll admit my bias if you admit yours."* "Sure thing. My bias is towards being correct."
Nice. Glad to see you back.
When he brought up Ferrari being “fine tuned”, I had to laugh. A Ferrari isn’t so much “finely tuned”, but rather it requires fine tuning. It’s “tuning” is so delicate that it requires constant maintenance to perform properly. A “typical” oil change is anything but typical compared to the average car.
Plus, a Ferrari is the antithesis to longevity; partially due to its “fine tuning”. The engine requires close tolerances to operate, and wear opens up those tolerances rather quickly.
Essentially, a Ferrari is a good example of “fine tuning” if one is arguing for young earth creationism...
But I have a feeling this guy knows as much about cars as he does about science. And with cars being my “thing”, when people use them in poor examples, I suppose you could say I get “triggered”. Lol
So a Ferrari is a F-16 or a F-35 of the Automobile world?
@@mikuhatsunegoshujin its both, depending on what model you get but it's a finetuned, high maintenance adventure between rides! LMAO!
Plus, if everything is always degrading, how could a car even be built?
Ferrari Ups Extended Warranty to 15 Years | News | Car and Driver
www.caranddriver.com › news › p...
Fantastic example, StL ChuckO!
"I don't understand stuff. Therefore god!"
Also, "someone said "god", therefore god exists!", a thesis so astonishingly stupid that the only thing I find more astonishingly stupid is the audience that sat there quietly listening instead of laughing him off stage.
Just finished Quantum Theory Made Easy parts 1 and 2 and loved them. Hope to see part 3 sometime soon!
Hold up. We're not supposed to look back to what Newton or Darwin said, because it's antiquated and old? Yet we're supposed to refer to a BOOK WRITTEN 2,000 YEARS AGO. Somehow Darwin is so old as to be considered antiquated, but a 2,000 year old book of fairy tales and hyperbole...that isn't antiquated enough to ignore. WHAT THE FUCK?!?!
Also, so stoked to see you back KC.
It's good to have you back, KC.
I love how young Earth creationists cite the big bang as evidence of their religion lol
It’s nuts to me. Just like they now say not only is evolution a thing, the entire process happened in about 100 years after Noah’s flood from the “kinds” he had space for on the Ark. But billions of years of incremental changes? THAT is crazy talk
@@alisaurus4224 Newtonian physics is also still valid, it's just that we have a more general model, that being General relativity and Einstenian physics.
I'm a simple man. King Crocoduck posts a video and I listen.
KC is back!! ❤️❤️🤘😎🤘🏆🏆🏆🏆
Great to have you back 😊😊
To paraphrase Bill, "do you know how old that wheel technology is? And you're still using it? We can travel through the skies since at least a century ago, that's like the day before yesterday, and you aren't flying to your workplace?"
Dammit Croc! I already watched this on Aron's channel, but I want you to get them views too! harumph! The UA-cam Collab conundrum.
Guess what, I watched both, as this is very informative even for an amateur astronomer with 50 years experience.
@@Alessandro-B want a medal
@@nznegativeions Yes, please, Jeebus.
I'm out
When the first argument is "the 2nd law of thermodynamics" I realize it will be the same tired nonsense.
Thanks KC for taking the time and effort to keep this type of B.S. in check.
Creationists love to bring up the second law of thermodynamics.
Try asking them what the first one is.
Woohooo so hyped ... but i already seen it on Aron's channel :/ But i'll still rewatch it for pleasure's sake :)
Finally something worthy of watching 👏👏👏 missed ya bud
KC:: What do you call a collaboration between King Crocoduck and Aron Ra? The Creationist Meat Grinder.
Me: Correct, I would also have accepted "awesome".
Good to see you and again :)
He’s ALIVE!!!
And finally... Euclid's 'Elements' were published over two THOUSAND years ago, yet they stand as firmly now as when Euclid formulated them.
Hail and well-met, for the king has returned.
Thy Majesty is back!
Molag Bal that’s a very familiar way to speak to a king.
But I suppose a Daedra can afford it.
Good to see you back!
Are my eyes working? A King Crocoduck video??
Crossing my fingers for a science wars episode
The extreme over-reliance on analogies is already a massive red flag.
The creationist causailty argument falls down when you consider that time itself came into being somehow, and causality does not exist in a universe without time.
A new Crocoduck video?
That's a surprise, but a welcome one.
the king has returned. long live the king!
It always escapes these guys that, even if their proofs weren't riddled with mistakes, they are proving an erstwhile creator and not their living flavor of deity.
I will watch this later, its like a treat, needs to be savored
JOYYYYY
I love you King Crocoduck
. You don't have to create videos all the time. Quality >>> Quantity, always
A blast from the past
Haven't seen this in a comment yet and I'ma bit late, but the monkey thought experiment reminded me of this:
Fansworth: Well, as a man enters his 18th decade, he thinks back on the mistakes he's made in life.
Amy: Like the heaps of dead monkeys?
Farnsworth: Science cannot move forward without heaps!
I thought you had quit in the YT game, welcome back.
THE KING HAS RETURNED!!!
I first read the title as "Creationists meet Grindr."
This is slightly less interesting but still appreciated.
Was literally just thinking about your videos haha
Kano's appearance was gold. Partially because the Koala Kong was the original Crocoduck.
so basicly:
"the big bang happen, therefore god made it happen, so god must exists if there was a big bang"
And this is called begging the question. Funny how creationist arguments often end up being logical fallacies, init?
The most common argument is that how the universe started at such a low entropy? And therefore god must have started it. That causes a problem for god in particular for being a dick, to create a universe with increasing entropy that eventually will end in a heat death. Which creationists might argue that god can fix it at any moment with his magical powers, but then why an all-powerful entity made something that constantly needs fixing?
However I still need the answer for a main question about low entropy in the beginning.
This just had to be uploaded before I head to my physics mid term didn't it KC? But I'm glad to see you're back! I look forward to more of your content!
I just got recommended this video a year later 😂
Got to love UA-cam in my right?
So either way I'll throw in a little bit of points here and there when it comes to the scientific things he talks about like the big bang which immediately started off with an incorrect assumption of that the Big Bang definitively shows that there was a beginning to the universe but all the big bang shows is that the current state of our universe began 13.8 billion years ago although is possible that there was a similar State before the Big Bang with a big Crush leading back into a big bang leading into a big crunch and so on and so on and it's also possible that sang before the universe makes no sense as time is required to say something came before something so acting as if anything could exist before the universe when time seems intrinsically linked to our universe's current state of existence means that you're begging the question and assuming that there definitively was a beginning and you're assuming that your God exists and was necessary when there's plenty enough theories that show that our God isn't required
I'm sure you'll say the same thing crocodile or something similar but I also just want to throw my two cents in just for any other theists here also get recommended this video again just so they can if they want engage with me here
Brilliantly explained, King Croduck. I understood it all.