Volvo S90 VS Mercedses E-Class Crash Test
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 січ 2017
- 2017 Volvo S90 VS Mercedses E-Class Crash Test
►► you may like :
► 2017 BMW 3 Series VS 2017 Audi A4 CRASH TEST
• Video
► 2017 Mercedes E -Class VS 2016 Jaguar Xf - Crash Test
• Video
► 2016 Mercedes C-Class VS 2016 BMW 3-Series crash test
• Video
► Top 10 - World premiere at the 2017 Detroit Motor Show
• Video
____________
► If you love cars, you should subscribe now / dodymotors
subscription You will receive the latest automotive News.
GOOD LUCK - Авто та транспорт
Volvo did better on the pedestrian, but in the pole test the MB did a lot better. That pole went in deep into the Volvo.
Actually you can’t really look at the side impact deformation like that. Volvo makes a crumple box in the center console (been doing it since the first gen s80) with a strong steel set of rods in the seats that transfer the door crushing into the box in the center console so not all of the side impact has to be absorbed by the door and allows for far greater energy dissipation. In the video of a Tesla model 3 vs an older s60 it shows a significant decrease in G forces on the dummie’s head and lower spine in the Volvo. It’s not about how whole the car looks in the end. It’s about how much energy gets to the passengers and how much it protects them. So the seat doesn’t get crushed on because of the steel rods that push the forces across the passenger. It’s part of the SIPS protection system. Pretty neat especially when you part out these cars and see how it’s all set up. Now don’t get me wrong. Mercedes does make a pretty tough car. It’s just Volvo works harder now on energy deflection than just being rock.
I have always had Volvo's after a very had accident that left me part paralysed . Volvo are the safest cars no matter what you like .. safe us far better as I found out I will not buy anything else ever again.
@@sarahharrington9895 I’m sorry that you had an awful crash. I too had a terrifying crash. I am fine though. It haunted me for years. I used to get nightmares and night sweats. The accident was my fault. The Audi A4 was speeding so I didn’t see it until it was too late. I t-boned it and the guy had to be cut out of the vehicle which was a write off. I was unharmed, 8 months pregnant with twins ( I gave birth 4 weeks later to 2 healthy babies) I was in a Volvo S40. My car survived but I sold it after the crash and bought the biggest Volvo I could get. XC90 and I still drive XC90 to this date. It might not be considered the coolest car by many people but to me it is my rock.
it's interesting watching the airbag expand in the volvo. it is instantaneously surrounding the face, enveloping it from outwards in and seems to have a centre part that protrudes a little.
Until recently Volvo had an unbeaten safety record, its only because other companies are copying that they are getting closer, who invented the Cross over body seat belt for a start, yes it was Volvo
1978 Mercedes-Benz introduces the Antilock Brake System (ABS) that becomes the cornerstone of automotive safety.
Car crash testing began with mercedes benz back in the 50s and they revolutionized the airbag (SRS air bag)its thefirst car to use safe effective passenger side airbag and side impact airbag bag in 1997 and also seat belt airbag
@@GEOLOGYandSOILSCIENCE Volvo first introduced airbags in the 80's with impact side airbags in 1994
@@loveantics1074 Thanks to Mercedes-Benz for inventing body crumple design, rigid safety passenger compartment, side impact protection, automotive ABS, ESP, first use of airbags, and most importantly, Mercedes-Benz for inventing car crash tests, and finally, thanks to Mercedes for inventing the car.
@@loveantics1074Wrong answer, the first airbag in a car was standard in the Mercedes S-Class in 1981. The front passenger airbag also celebrated its world premiere in a Mercedes.
Today all the auto stopping tech is all the rage and volvos have had it since 2007.
The more a car crumbles upon impact the safer it is. Your body absorbs less impact. So just because a car looks destroyed after an accident doesn’t mean it’s unsafe. The opposite actually.
It depends on where it crumbles for example it shouldn’t crumble the cabin/roof area
Exept for the passanger compartment obviously.
Not really cos you can never predict the outcomes of an accident so let's stick to hope.
Not opposite actually.
The the strength for the non-crumble zone should be just above the crumble zone. Not overkill and made it into a tank. Because heavier the car, more energy needs to be devolve in the same speed crash.
Now, there are different angle and speed in every crash,so it's not accurate to say which is safer just by the photo.
Also, there are different material quality and different design effort put in to the car. Crumble zone has much more complicated ma thematic involve than normal people imagine.
You have to calculate the length of the engine bay, calculate the mass of the engine bay, calculate the strength of the non-crumble zone (the energy it can take before it deforms), calculate each strength of the certain material etc.
English isn't my mother language so what I listed is tip of iceberg, there's stuff I can type in English.
Anyway, a lot of manufacture just made shitty car and claim it has crumble zone, but what they mean is that the whole car is a crumble zone.
@@saucy_the_sauce100_it_rack9 All accidents are predictable. Did you think this through before making that comment?
Why do you think they test cars to begin with? What do you think can happen to a car that has not been tested for? Give one example.
Surprised at the amount of damage at only 64km/hr.
What did you expect? A scratch? Lol
Immagine 120 Km/h
This is why you should always slow down as much as possible even when it is clear that hitting something is unavoidable. If you are going at 120kph and something jumps in front of you car, slamming the brakes and getting your speed down to 70 kph or 60 kph will make an extremely large difference compared to just giving up and letting your car crash at the full 120kph.
that volvo side pole impact seems to hurt
The front and back is dense.
Side pole crash won’t hurt that much.
Why the passenger airbag not deployed at 50 frontal hit?
Porqué no están las ventanillas subidas???
Gözle fark edilecek kadar basit.. Mercedes çok sağlam
Volvo has a big damage on the roof,Mercedes has a huge frontal crash damping ability,it is clear...Also Volvo has a lot of aluminium part on body than Mercedes,may be Vovo is more safe for pedestrians bacause of alloy compnents.
Severe whiplash and impact with the headrest for the rear passengers. I'm wondering when airbags will be fitted to the rear of front seats to protect those travelling in the rear.
I was thinking the same thing
Never because it’s not necessary and it’s more dangerous for whoever is sitting in the front seat
@@jacopom2778 whiplash puts the neck at risk; the sudden acceleration/deceleration forces put the brain at risk. Airbags at the rear are necessary and they will come in time, just like rear seat belts did.
@@Visionery1 It looks like the new 2021 Mercedes S-Class will have airbags in the rear of the front seats. The S-Class always pioneers technology like this so that is to be expected
Siempre el dummy en el asiento del conductor golpea su cabeza en el pilar B al rebotar en el airbag.
Ever the dummy driver HIT her head in the B pillar when boucing....
Volvo je Volvo!
Tako je....
Samo sto mercedes ima bolje ocene😁😁
Mercedes je Mercedes. Volvo je Volvo!
@@danielsvoboda7325 mercedes>volvo
@@tsebehtgma6422 Volvo 🤝 Mercedes 😄
Tell volvo’s passengers that they crashed.
😂😂
Omg lmao
Best genius comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Volvo 👍
Mercedes Benz!!!!!
Still number one👍👍👍👍👍
In telling that they developed something, but it was just stolen?
The Best Car Mercedes Benz
Want to see mortoway style tests.. 70-90mph going to a back of a car or lorry or impacts with central res..
No car is capable of withstanding being hit from behind by a Lorry doing 70, let alone the passengers.
That being said, Volvo are alone in safety testing their cars so comprehensively for rear impacts
Bro, if a loaded lorry is travelling 90 mph and hits the back of a car, it will erase you from existence no matter what car you are driving.
I don't thin you truly appreciate the forces behind a 40-60 ton truck doing 90mph are. Such an impact would blow the car into little bits of pieces and the truck would not even be slowed down by the impact (which means if the cars are waiting in a traffic light and the truck loses it's brakes, it will blow several cars into peaces before coming to a stop).
What I just told you is not even a hypothetical example of what would happen if a truck ran through several cars, this is something that actually happened in some countries. The non graphic ones are here on youtube.
The first one I saw the volvos roof getting all wavy during the impact
Yes Mertz , with engine parts , seatbelts,airbags,chairs,turbo,injectors and other parts made in Romania,Bulgaria,Slovakia or other countries than Germany.
Third party yes
Volvo❤️
Volvo S 90 ! 💪💪
But mercedes is more safe
S90 best car ever made .
@@sarahharrington9895 In your dreams 😂😂
@@m.b.6744 well I trust you have been in a serious car accident . Ask me pet I am now disabled so before you think it's funny trust me ain't !
@@tsebehtgma6422 CAP Volvo is the safest
? What was the result ? Which is the better ??
En % dans l'ensemble des 4 test, la Volvo obtient 86% // la Mercedes obtient 81% ! 🤔
0:50 dap
Good catch!
dab*
@@phantyr ı know
@@wrestler6104 then correct it
Volvo is Life
I dont give a single f*ck about pedestrian security, just want a car that protects the passengers to the max.
Who needs more cost in metainance?
Mercedes glass seems to be a bit fragile.... Collapses totally, while Volvos is intact!
Yeh volvo glass is much better
glass is glass
You want the glass to shatter to dissipate more energy from the impact
Bens better quality
It’s also the idea that the Volvo is able to dissipate the energy in an accident much better and therefore the glass has less chance of shattering.
Volvo easily takes the dub! Less impact than a semi or any other commercial vehicle of such.
What? No side Airbags at Mercedes? Why didnt they opened? Even my A Class from 2001 has side Airbags
they didn't open because there was no side impact.
@@1deepVonte thats not the Point. At the most time all airbags open even when there is no side impact
Make video Kia Optima
5:15
0:50
Volvo👑💪
50km is nothing, people drive 130-200 km
Sure, but its not where the accidents happens. The speed is high because the roads are safe. Where there are lots of obstacles, traffic, pedestrians and so on the speed is lower and its also where a majority of the accidents happens.
So you dont slow down when you realize there will be an accident?
I don't think there is good chance to survive side impact at 50 km/h much less 200 km/h, so let's start with small first.
True
Volvo for me didn’t like the Mercedes pedestrian safety it hit the kid 😬😬😬
V90 vs. S-Class please
On the side pole test, the Volvo’s glass didn’t shatter but the pole went way deep in then the Mercedes
Volvo is made to sacrifice the chassis and Volvo was smart to utilize the center console as part of it but added reinforced steel rods in the seats so when the doors finish compressing, it moves the force around the passenger and into a crush box in the center console. Therefor it looks worse but significantly less energy is transmitted to the passenger while the passenger is fine because it still kept the seat area whole and just used the center of the car instead of having to rely purely on the doors for energy absorbance. It’s part of their SIPS set up. They have used it since the first s80 models. I’ve parted out one and it’s impressive to see how it all works. You can see in the Volvo that the passengers move significantly less compared to the Mercedes. In a Tesla model 3 Vs s60 video you see this really coming into action.
It's a crumple zone built to absorb the impact rather than the passengers.
The MB hit the pedestrian, the Volvo not. Anyway: I would go for the Volvo because it has better, more comfortable seats, the design i premium and not bulky as the MB. And I do not buy a car for crushing it.
Had a volvo s90 it’s a good Car, but then. I switched to the e-klass, I prefer The E-klass. Also the seats in the Volvo look comfy but the’y are not
Older volvos have the most comfortable seats ever.
@@vladavasiljev and Saab
@@vladavasiljev which model if you dont mind me asking?
@@eklasse2869 I did the opposit, From MB and BMW to a Volvo S90. Wont ever go back! Love the Volvo comfort! And I think Volvo is a more good looking car
that pole test did the MB better. all the other things i think the volvo is better.
Reduce the speed limit to 70km/hr globally then every car will be safe .
Volvo
Volvo W
The more smarter, safer car, so more crazy and stupid people will be outside thanks to the phones.
ofc the volvo is a TINY bit more safer. But u have to admit that the merc is older then the volvo. The volvo's material are stronger because they are newer.
I don't think it's the inventiveness of the material as you suggest, rather the design and implementation of their materials. But, I think what you mean to say is the Volvo is of a newer design, thus they've engineered a safer composite and placement of those materials, hopefully.
Yes, because steel is so new material that improves every year.
No check out the roof flex of the volvo at 1:00, this weakness also shows in the pole thest. The mercedes glass vreaks, but the pole penetrates the roof of the volvo even further
@@eelcovvliet It doesn't matter much, lower side is more important and roof flexing is a great thing. Most modern cars use roof as a energy transfer medium.
@@eelcovvliet roof does not need to hold force only the pillars need to be strong.
Volvo best
So, Volvo's luxury sedan is WINNER!
adı yeter MERCEDES
hi
Volvo is and will stay the safest car in their class!
How does anything Tesla stack up to a comparable volvo?
@@jaysonsiebold Well.
no. mercedes is more safety
The best or nothing
I love my Mercedses.
Does that include the rust 😂😂😂
ne demişler mercedes ve diğerleri
Volvo 👌🥰
저도 이럭해 되지 않으거예요
32 км об столб не о чем! Было было эпичней если было хотябы 80км
Даже на 60 там будет мясо, удар сильнее в 4 раза и столб войдёт в салон наполовину.
А як тоді безпеку продавать? Одні маніпулянти кругом.
@@igroman-toys Не смогут продать безопасность - заставят купить экологию ;)
Volvo seats are made to move on side impact
I agreed.
SIPS (side impact protection system)
Thats whats happen if you are letting you child drive in the volvo and sit in the back seat.
Мерседес
VOLVO
Volvo’s Safery assist is much much better than MB’s. Volvo 93 vs MB only 62 points and you saw how the Mercedes hit the pedestrian but Volvo stopped really well. Volvo is clearly safer than Mercedes. Also Volvo’s side impact safety is really impressive because it reduces the forces much better than MB due to Volvo SIPS which allows the front seat to move centerwards and is much more softer and safer to the driver or front passenger. This is an old system Volvo has had over 25 years.
The best or nothing love more MB
Mercedes 😏
Mercedes and Volvo, it's smiler to put cherry and audi. Volvo not good car. Always problems, and very expensive details
🙄🙄🙄 None of these cars are unsafe. It’s called seatbelts and airbags (both invented my Volvo) and then a few other details.... 😉
Results of the 4 tests in % , Volvo S90 obtains 86% // Mercedes E-Class obtains 81% 🤔. So the best is the Volvo S90 !
Non pengaman
Volvo always
Volvo Glass is stronger
Benz başka tanımam 👍
tanıştırayım (_)_)::::::::::::::::::::::ID
@@isengardmiddle5053 😂😂😂
Volvo still the best safety vehicle.
Mercedes smashes this volvo without a sweat. Mercedes offers a class higher safety.
can I have some of what you're smoking
@@animenon5247 Well, i think glasses don't burn at all.
@@bartomiejwicher9374 thats unfortunate
Volvo the best!
Mercedes ist bes wagen
I’m a Volvo fan ,but from all i see ,i think the Mercedes is safer .
Volvo is safer. The Volvo slows down during the crash but the Mercedes goes to a full stop immediately. Therefore Volvo much safer.
Not true Costisor
Wow good points why right there
Total des 4 tests, Volvo obtient 86% // Mercedes obtient 81% ! 😉
Mercedes e class daha iyi.mercedes good
with pole test volvo looks as shit
Da beste oder nichts🙂🙂
Also volvo 🤣🙈
Also volvo 🤣🙈
you would have to be a dummy to get into either of these cars, reminds me of the mini metro crash test :-(
Nice trolling
Lock at volvo s roof at frontal crash.... bleah... fk volvo
Look* But why do you hate Volvo?
Volvo! 👍
Mietek górą
Mercedes better 👑
ほしい ☺︎
Benz❤
Mercedes daha başarılı sonuç olarak bence 👍👍👍
I still would have Mercedes
Mercedes❤️✊
volvo.
Mercedes leader in safety and luruxy
george ibrahim no Volvo is
Euan Elston merc is the leader Volvo was in 2017
Not true George
Benz💪
@@yacinelebied8734 Volvo 💪
No Difference.
4.08 for example xd
Aaa 2 türk
Benz looks safer...
Stupid, Volvo is the safest on planet!
@@s.n.6211 in your dreams. haha
Mercedes are the best cars and safe...
@@catalinmindrila6081 When it comes to safety, Volvo has been leading for decades. Volvo has almost every patents of safety things like the seatbelt(1959). Volvo vehicles are made of bor steel, which is the hardest steel ever used in auto industry(only Volvo). The safest SUV was in 2020 the Volvo XC60 and XC90, the safest sport wagon was Volvo V90(source: NCAP). Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
@@s.n.6211 bringing out the facts, let's go.
@@s.n.6211 Mercedes-Benz invented the crumple zone (1951), airbags (1971), ABS (1978), electronic traction control (1985), side curtain airbags (1998), night view assist (2005), and the surround view system in 2012. They also have their Pre-Safe technology and invented the car. Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
У вольво металл как фольга))) VOLVO какашка.
Ты видно мастер по какашкам?😜
@@user-wj7jn1xp8w мастер не мастер, а в сортах говна разбираюсь 😀
Ist halt Mercedes.... Wie beim Volvo das Dach schwingt.. 🙄
If I hit a pedestrian, i pray to god, its a democrat. So i stick to Mb
Both crap cars now, just the image remains.
Merc 💪💪
The Best Mercedes.
Not even close. Volvo feels more like a chinese car that it is then the mb. At these speeds of course they are matched. What about 20 30 more km per hour. Volvo will fall apart meanwhile mb will still offer some protection.
Mercedes is safer