I think the international language of the world should be welsh, it has incredibly easy pronunciation, and is already widely spoken by over 100 people!
As a Welsh person I absolutely agree. For some people like me in South Wales barely speak the language or more commonly not at all. What fools they are. Welsh is the most useful and powerful language in the world.
For the world language I suggest Army Slavic. Army Slavic is a language created by the Austro - Hungarian Empire to make communication between the different Slavic people within the Army easier. It consists of about 80 words that are almost exclusively useful for pre WW2 Warfare, which is the simplicity a world language needs.
Picking a language that is mostly used for warfare doesn't seem like that great of an idea, but I guess we already picked American English for that one. 😂
The international language should be Finnish. No-one speaks it as a first language and it's hard enough to learn that anyone who can speak it should be worth talking to.
Basque should honestly be the de facto language of the entire world because it's not (as far as we know) related to any other language on Earth, meaning that everyone will have an equally difficult time trying to learn it.
The idea of a language that is equally difficult for everyone may seem appealing, but in practice, an international language must be accessible and quick to learn. Unlike Basque, Esperanto was designed to be simple, regular, and intuitive, allowing people from different cultures and languages to communicate effectively without years of effort. Its neutrality and ease of learning make it a much more practical choice for a common language (David Malone, Esther Schor).
And what's wrong with that? When you learn a natural language there's no guarantee that you can find a community. The only kind of people who learn Esperanto are those who want to join a friendly international space. It may not be useful but learning languages isn't just about "business" or "travel." But there is a service where esperanto speakers host follow esperantists for cheaper so that's something I guess.
Let's gather one person from each country in the world who don't speak any other languages than their native one to an inhabited island and let them live there until they develop the ultimate international language
Probably that experiment wouldn't result in one single international language, it would actually just form multiple groups of people who speak similar languages and these groups would form their own dialects. You'd have the romance languages speakers forming a group of their own, slavic language speakers forming another group, scandinavians forming another, English and Arabic speakers would probably only interact with those who speak their own language, since many countries speak these ones, and those who speak languages that are "isolated" like the person from Hungary, the one from Finland and etc. would either have to learn another language during the experiment or they'd simply be lonely
funner even fact: China government still subsidize the Esperanto teaching and learning from the Mao days in which there really believes speak it will be the future.
I learnt Esperanto and discovered I could already read French, which I took up in turn. So, not a wasted venture. Also it has helped in part with my German and Greek. Also living in a new state I met a group by the Esperanto shirt a gentleman was wearing. This gave me an immediate group. Also.. great for sci fi lovers as you can understand obscure comments in Gattaca, Blade 3, Red Dwarf and so on. So for me it has been very positive and easy.
The perfect lingua franca would be a mix of the most final boss languages, Polish and Finnish with a little hint of a very niche language like Luxembourgish, topped with some Chinese grammar and Danish pronunciation. Just fantastic.
I had no real problems learning Esperanto as a first foreign language. It didnt take long and gave me a great basis for other languages. Instead of going through trying to understand new concepts, I could just spend a little time learning Esperanto and go "Oh, this concept in this language is like this in Esperanto". I've gotten way more out of Esperanto than French or Spanish. It just depends what you do.
Somewhat agree. I actually found it easier to learn Spanish in my second language French, rather than my first language, English, because the word order of Spanish and French is amazingly similar. So, it's easy to think in Spanish using French. I think you would have been better off learning one Romance language well, then learning the subsequent romance languages off your first one. It didn't surprise me that on UA-cam there are actually instructors in French teaching Spanish and vice versa!
3:20 "It just has too many words" - Oh ? I've got a language that can solve that. "It should only have a few hundred words" - OH ?? "And that's why I think toki pona should be the international language instead" - AYYYYYYYY
Toki pona with less than 200 words seems great, until you want to be at least somewhat precise. Let say you want to ask somebody to buy you strawberries. The word strawberry in toki pona doesn't exist, so you have to say something like "kili loje sike pi kama lili tawa anpa pi kasi lon sewi" which according to some dictionary I found means "A red fruit which is cone shaped and has leafs on the top" I'm not sure if this translation is correct, but even if it is, despite the fact that it has 21 syllables, it is still too few to tell for sure if it is strawberry or raspberry. Also numbers in toki pona sucks.
@@urojony3177 that's true, but I don't know that it sucks because of that. It succeeds at the thing it was trying to do which was to be a maximally compact language
As a Spanish speaker, I support calling Esperanto "Spanish 2" but only after we give it our always useful and supereasy to learn verb conjugations! Esperanto totally needs two imperfect subjunctive forms!
As an Esperantophile I completely agree with your opinion, Esperanto has ruined my life. Esperanto took away my wife, my children and most importantly, my will to learn new languages.
Ĉu vere? Mi ankoraŭ lernas lingvojn. Ili ĉiuj ŝajnas malpli bonaj, tro komplikaj, tro malfacilaj, kaj eĉ malbelaj kompare al E-o, sed malgraŭ tio, mi daŭre ĝuas lerni ilin.
@@Beau_Rivage What I said was: ¿En serio? Yo todavía aprendo idiomas. Comparado al Esperanto, parecen menos buenos, demasiado complicados, demasiado difíciles, e incluso feos, pero a pesar de eso, todavía disfruto aprenderlos. Hope that's accommodating enough for you. 如果你还不懂我可以用中文说
The international languages should be English & Dutch, which are the prettiest and most refined languages with the most pretty and poetic words and also the easiest languages ever - Welsh is a pretty language as well, so it should be taught in school as one of the optional Celtic languages, so everyone should also learn at least one Celtic language and at least one Latin language!
esperanto killed my family and forced me to complete the esperanto course on duolingo and have a 6 hour conversation in esperanto with 10 different people. overall i'd give it a 8/10.
If you want to learn a useless Romance language, why not choose something badass like Latin?? They also have a community of nerds who will welcome you!
This is what I've done with Esperanto: - Traveled and was hosted by Esperanto speakers in different countries; - I hosted Esperanto backpackers from different nationalities in my house and we practiced other languages; - Been to Esperanto meetings in my town, watched cultural lectures with people from other countries, had some nice exchange with people; - Been to an international congress with hundreds of people from all continents; - We spent one week at a hotel with all those people, full immersion, music, cultural events, crazy parties, night clubs, restaurants... everything in Esperanto. - In the congress, I've seen all sorts of weird people: spiritualists, atheists, gays, vegans, Buddhists, old wise men that look like beggars, Linux users... Esperanto attracts such weirdos! One thing is sure: you won't get bored. - One night at 3 in the morning we were with a group of Esperantists on the beach "moon bathing"... all naked! The atmosphere was like in this video: ua-cam.com/video/H_OYn6PZKpw/v-deo.html Apart from that, yeah, I'd say learning Esperanto is almost totally useless. If you want a language for your career, studies, for sitting down and wait speakers to walk by... Esperanto is a no. However, you could learn it just as mental gymnastics, like people play chess, knit, spend hundreds of hours on social media and play video games... so why not Esperanto? You need to be some sort of adventurer, backpacker and have a certain degree of detachment to enjoy Esperanto to the fullest. At the congress, I bought this book "Ili vivis sur la tero" (They lived on Earth - eight years of migration around our planet). It's the amazing story of a couple who circled the planet speaking Esperanto and meeting Esperanto people. They say: When all your belongings for eight years fit in a backpack, you realize that the joy of life is not about what you have, but really about what you are. So yeah, you have to be a bit crazy to study and enjoy Esperanto and its philosophy. Some correct information: - You will find Esperanto groups perhaps in all major cities around the world, much more than for most natural languages with millions of speakers. - Esperanto is not among the most spoken languages, but it’s definitely among the most studied languages. I’ve conduced some polls in international forums, it ranked among the top 10. We can confirm that with Duolingo, there were times when Esperanto learners were more than a million, more than most of their courses. - It’s actually against the goal of Esperanto to be the language of a specific place. - Esperanto looks European on the surface, but it shares similarities with Oriental languages in the structure, as pointed out by linguist Claude Piron. - China is one of the world’s greatest supporters of Esperanto. Even the official webpage of the Chinese government has an Esperanto version. - Its rich vocabulary allows it to be used in Science and the most refined Literature. An international language must be able to share world knowledge. But that still makes it easier than natural languages - making new words and concepts is like playing with Lego. - English hasn’t become international because of its culture, or because of its intrinsic linguistic properties. It has become international for one chief reason: political and military power. (David Crystal, author of the Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language).
Saluton! Mi eklernis Esperanton kaj mi estas komencanto. Mi ŝatus renkonti novajn homojn por praktiki Esperanton... Ĉu vi povus helpi min? Mi konas neniun, kiu parolas Esperanton.
"We can confirm that with Duolingo, there were times when Esperanto learners were more than a million, more than most of their courses" So where are these millions of fluent Esperanto speakers from Duolingo?
As a Russian speaker I would like to say that Russian and Italian languages (and also Portuguese) have similar system of sounds, so for us it's much easier to pronounce than English, for example. And vice versa.
@@tobyalder42true, but the sound qualities are the most important thing. Russian doesn't have a distinction between i, like in ship, and e like in sheep, for example, so we never sound natural when saying these two words. And th and s sounds in one word still appear in my nightmares, even though for a russian I'm a f-ing 😱EENOSTRANYETS😱 with my ~B2. Or maybe it's B1. I once scored C1-C2 on an online test😂, but that was definitely bullsh*t.
@@ldmtag Actually, Russian does have that distinction, many speakers just don't realise it. Russian "и" is pronounced differently in stressed and unstressed positions, according to the IPA (which may not be fully accurate, though) the sounds are like in English, "i" and "ɪ". A Russian speaker would pronounce, for example, English "benign" more or less correctly, but he would pronounce incorrectly Italian "benigno"
@@tobyalder42 yes, that's correct. But most of the unstressed Иs are the same, and most of the stressed Иs are the same as well. Doesnt help with ship/sheed distinction.
Italian was chosen as a model for pronunciation because it has the simplest phonology out of all extant languages. So a good model for one who's trying to make his language as simple as possible, wouldn't you think?
@@satrancbuyukusta4751 What do you mean? That other languages exist doesn't change the orthography of Esperanto or Italian. It still stands that there are fewer sounds in these languages than in all the others, so by definition they are simpler. For further explanation - all the sounds in Italian and Esperanto are present in all other languages (so no new sounds need to be learned) but there are sounds in all other languages not found in Italian and Esperanto. Therefore, the orthographies of Italian and Esperanto are easier for everyone to learn.
@@NatoBoram In italian you pronounce every letter in a word (except in some cases like the letter H that often doesn't get pronounced), but in english if you want to say Wednesday you say it like Wensday, skipping almost half of the word
Challennge for Language Simp: Create your own Language with these rules -Grammar should be as simplistic as possible with no gender, conjugations, cases etc. (Like chinese) -Alphabet should be pictures so it looks cool and not American (Like Korean) -No homophones or homonyms allowed -No synonyms allowed -The alphabet will probably be bigger than korean in order to have more sounds and therefore easier not to create homonyms -Words are created with the given alphabet by the community where it is tracked which words already exist and which sounds are already taken -Buy a huge plot of land somewhere -Only people who pass a standardised language test in made up language is allowed to live there -Then the language will evolve from there
toki pona is pretty close with it's 120 sitelen pona (its """alphabet"""), has no cases, and all synonyms are the same word. it also has a community where people develop the language and add new words and reanalyse old words and just speak the language.
@@notwithouttext Its grammar still isn't as simple as it could be, and it is VERY ambiguous. Toki Pona is better than Esperanto but still far from functional.
People: Create an artificial language to make it easier to communicate with each other Also people: Continue to communicate in English and don’t use Esperanto People who learned Esperanto:
Not Python. Humans won't apply significant whitespace correctly, see below. I'm with the semicolons and curly brackets. The Piano {was sold to the lady} with carved legs
I think the name "esperanto" comes from the root that means "hope" in romance languages. For exemple in france it's "esperance", and i'm pretty sure it's similar in spanish
Of course. In fact, 'esperanto' is (in Esperanto) a participle meaning 'one who hopes', just as, say, 'kantanto' means 'one who sings'. The creator of the language signed his first publications as "Dro Esperanto" = "the hopeful doctor", and his pen-name stuck to the language (which he himself had simply named Lingvo internacia).
@@angelostsirimokos8104By the way, another English word for "one who hopes" is "aspirant," so I don't know why people don't say the obvious "Esperanto means aspirant" and instead dance around it with primitive caveman English.
I like how the phonology is purported to be super easy and intuitive to use, yet the most spoken language that contains all phonemes Esperanto contains is Polish, which coincidentally happens to be Zamenhof's native language.
When I was very young I wanted to learn Esperanto because I read a children's book about languages that left me with the impression that Esperanto was the language of the future. How many Esperanto activists begged you not to make this video?
I learned English as my second language young. But I gave up on learning esperanto the moment I realized how different it is from what I know and how little people speak it.
Same as me, I found about it in a children's book about communication, and fell in love with the idea. Took me many years, but finally got to learning it, and I thank my inner child for keeping that memory alive for so long, despite all the people who tried to disuade me.
@@frechjo The children's book from which I found out about Esperanto was called "The Language Book" by Franklin Folsom. I also learned about the Code Talkers from reading that book.
@@tmhc72_gtg22c Oh, cool, you even remember the name :) I can't remember what my book was called (something in Spanish), but it was about communication in general (not languages specifically). It's amazing how those little things can stay with us forever! Lucky for us, our parents cared about and were able to widen our worlds like that.
It has so many Words because you can create Words! And no one is forcing the youth to learn Esperanto, unlike english wich presents the same problem as Esperanto for chinese people.
Esperanto gets so much unnecessary hate. I think ppl should just have fun with the language. Even if it doesn’t ever achieve it’s goal purpose I think it’s still cool to learn and honestly I wish more people around my age spoke it. I feel like it would be so fun to be able to communicate with more people in Esperanto
Ive never understood the resistance to learning it. People are willing to learn “useless” languages all the time like Pig Latin or gibberish to communicate but a actual structured language they want nothing to do with. Add in the fact that its easy to learn and actually helps speed up learning other languages and I still don’t see why its hated.
I think Icelandic should be the lingua de franca of the whole world. It’s incredibly simple (I learned it when I was only a baby) and everyone around me speaks it. Besides, who doesn’t want to sound like a badass viking. First class will be learning the voiceless alveolar lateral affricate.
The big superiority term adore and the numbers must be edited out, such words and numbers only reflect me The Goddess and cannot be misused by ppl in any way in yt names or names or in comments etc - adore is love related term, and love related terms only reflect me the only lovable being, and one should use words such as like or find this language pretty etc, not words such as adore or love! Astral terms such as Sol and words such as ber also cannot be misused in names or yt names and must be changed - only we pure / superior beings (me & the pure protectors aka the alphas) reflect astral terms / names / items etc!
The international languages should be English & Dutch & Old Norse, which are the prettiest and most refined languages with the most pretty and poetic words and also the easiest languages ever, and Norwegian is also one of the prettiest ever! Icelandic is also gorgeous and I am learning it, but Old Norse is a bit easier to read and it looks a bit more refined because it doesn’t have those extra Us before the last Rs / consonants, so it’s more suitable to be an universal language - but everyone should learn both Icelandic and Old Norse, and the other main Nordic / Germanic languages! Esperanto is a nice language, not the prettiest Latin language, but still nice enough to learn, so it’s on my list of languages I want to learn and improve, and it’s similar to Spanish & Latin, and the word Esperanto is nice and fits the language well, so what this video says isn’t true at all, probably just parody!
A friend of mine was Canada's ambassador to Iceland and he told me that Icelandic is very challenging for English speakers, but I told him Japanese would probably come in at a close second.
I've been learning Esperanto recently and I agree with a lot of this, but I'm just learning it because it's something unique and interesting to put on a college application/scholarship.
Many people start learning it by linguistic curiosity and then find out that it is so interesting to connect with Esperanto speakers all over the world
One feature I love about Esperanto is its agglutination. The book La Bona Lingvo shows how you can be very expressive in Esperanto. It has a lot of words but you can also express complex concepts with a smaller vocabulary. It makes the language able to express a lot of nuance and be more brief. An entire clause can become just one word thanks to affixes and grammar. You can use compound words easily. In other languages, you need to memorise thousands of words. In Esperanto, you need about a thousand and a handful of prefixes and suffixes to do the same.
@@nsf001-3 Yes. That always reminded me of the coeliac disease 😅. I guess coeliac disease sufferers can only speak analytic languages, then. *EDIT:* Also; I guess people, who are allergic to glue, as well.
which is something that languages such as Japanese and Turkish have. I know enough Japanese to get around but when words get long it can be confusing as to what is being said. For example a sentence that goes "Can I be forced to confess to that crime?" It's a difficult thing to both express and understand exactly in Japanese. For me anyway.
German can be agglutinative, too. Perhaps not as much as Esperanto, or in the same way, but still... My favorite long German word: "Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän." Means "Danube steamship company captain." My second favorite long German word: "Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänskajutenschlüssel." Means "Key to the Danube steamship company captain's cabin."
There was once, not so long ago, a language like Esperanto that was actually used and actually did what it was supposed to. It's called the Chinook Jargon, or Chinuk Wawa. It may not sound too pretty, but it developed naturally out of contact between Natives and European traders and was used as far up the West Coast as southern Alaska. There's even a tribe that still continues to use it (Grand Ronde in Oregon), who publishes a really info-packed text book in which you can learn all 500 of the language's root words. Tl;dr, Chinook Jargon did it better just by being a naturally-developed contact language.
Interesting fact: Since the time of Onisaburo Deguchi, the constructed language Esperanto has played a major role in the japanese Oomoto religion. Starting in 1924, the religion has published books and magazines in Esperanto and this continues today. It is said that they introduced Esperanto when they had contact with the Baháʼí Faith in 1921. A famous practitioner of the Oomoto faith is Morihei Ueshiba, founder of the martial art Aikido.
@@andrewwitcombe-small3713 Same. Also; I expected Aikido to be much older (by, like, several centuries); but it’s actually about on par with Sambo, by the looks of it.
This video is a satire, but for those who took this seriously: Why criticize Esperanto for being Eurocentric and challenging for others, only to support English as the international language? Esperanto isn't perfect, and Europeans with Romance languages have an advantage, but it's still easier and quicker to learn. It seems like a nirvana fallacy-just because it's not perfect, doesn't make it the worst language in the world, and we can also improve it with time.
@@amadeosendiulo2137 ofc the countries with 1 billion and 200 million people are going to have at least a few people who joined the esperanto cult, that proves nothing
1:53 "It's eurocentric" Because only European countries speak those languages and not most of the world. 3:35 Go to the 1984 world and learn Newspeak. 4:52 I actually researched and turns out being fluent in Esperanto actually makes learning other languages easier. 5:15 Sure buddy. 5:50 Didn't you just clown on Esperanto for being eurocentric? 5:55 Not sure about the others but Ancient Greece invented Democracy. 6:11 Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo. Also, SCIENCE!
If newspeak existed irl, people would still be able to think like people. Greek has different words for platonic love, sexual love, long-standing love, love for everyone, and love playful love, while English only has the word love. That doesn’t mean that English speakers don’t experience those kinds of love, it just means we use extra words to describe what kind of love it is. (Not to mention even successfully controlling a major language is impossible nowadays)
Perhaps at first Esperanto did fulfill the function for which it was created, but currently most speakers already know that Esperanto does not work as a lingua franca, I, for example, am learning it because it is an easy way to learn vocabulary and understand how many other languages work, I believe that the use of vocabulary from European languages (Spanish, English, French...), is due to the fact that European languages are the most widespread in the world, and in this way it is intended that is the easiest thing for most to learn. PD: In Poland there is a town with native speakers, but it is not a big town
@@Ivacraft to be fair it's only one, and they also speak english and arabic, and aren't fluent, but just look up "toki pona native speaker" with eriksealader, who taught his child toki pona (not the oziji ones because those are just skits),
I heard an interview with an expert on Second Language acquisition. She said the biggest predictor of success in learning a new language is an interest in the culture of that language. Esperanto has no culture, IMHO that is why it will never take off. English has both American and British culture for people to enjoy. The most commonly learned version of Arabic is Egyptian. Egypt has a huge film industry. etc, etc. People should study the language of a culture that interests them.
Saluton kara, mi estas el Egiptujo kaj Esperanto estas sufiĉa bona kaj justa lingvo por ĉiuj. Mi povas kompreni la anglan sed mi ne ŝatas kaj kapablas paroli ĝin kiel Esperanto. La germana estis por mi falcila ol la angla. Ne ĉiuj homoj kapablas paroli la anglan bone kaj ne ĉiuj homoj povas atingi altan nivelon en la lingvoj kaj mi per Esperanto konaktis kun multaj homoj pli multe kompare dum mia lernado de aliaj lingvoj kaj Dankon. Kaj estas Ĉinaj Esperantistoj, kiuj bone scipovas la lingvon.
@@erikdalna211 لغة جميلة صحيح ولكن عملية للاستخدام العالمي؟! ليس تماماً الاصوات ليست قياسية، القوانين ليست ثابتة، ونمط الكتابة مغاير تماماً للمعتاد في اغلب اللغات.... زِد على ذلك كونها وبصورة تقريبة لغة ذات طابع ديني على وجه العموم، يجب التفكير بموضوعية لمراعاة جميع جوانب اللغة المعتمدة من سهولة اللفظ إلى سهولة النحو والكتابة، الاسبرانتو حققت ذلك، الانجليزية لم تفعل ذلك من ناحية النطق والكتابة.
Mi ne nomus min samideano -- mi estas ja raŭmisto -- sed mi tute konsentas, ke Esperanto havas sian valoron kaj sian belecon, kaj Language Simp is just simply plain totally goddamn #$*! wrong with his misesperantism.
There will never be a neutral language for everyone. Every language will be easier for native speakers of some languages compared to others. I think that Esperanto was a good try. I like Interlingua the most as a conlang, as it is unabashedly trying to focus on the Romance languages (with some English as a kind of tie-breaker), and also takes away the difficult grammar.
It was a good try, but still failed. The thing is, most people don't want to learn any foreign language at all. In my country, most don't even have an International passport to travel. As for those, who care they aren't bothered so much with its difficulty. In fact a difficult language even has an advantage, because mastering it gives you an edge over the lazy crowd. Also people don't necessarily learn languages to talk with all people around the world, but rather because some culture is "superior" in their opinion and gives them possibilities, so they want to be a member of the "club".
The problem with interlingua is that it is much harder to speak it fluently than Esperanto. I speak Esperanto fluently and Interlingua is easy to understand for speakers of Romance languages
@@alalexesc I would guess that you have not studied them equally. And of course for those who studied Interlingua, they may think that it's easier to speak fluently than Esperanto (unless you are pointing to some unmentioned feature of the language itself). And as you mentioned, for speakers of Romance languages, Interlingua should be extra simple to learn. So I'd say it depends. From the little that I know, both Interlingua and Esperanto seem to be quite simple to learn as languages go (simple grammar, regularity, etc).
@@KnightOfEternity13 "still failed" Hard to succeed when Esperanto gets almost accepted as an international language at the league of Nation, but France and France only objects because they want to keep their monopoly as the language of diplomacy (which they lost to english), and then the nazis killed off many jews which Esperantists disproportionnately were, including Zamenhof's family. Being the world leading language has little to do with being a good language and a lot to do with being the language of a world power. English for the western world, Russian for the east when the USSR was a thing. If the US and Europe were to lose a world war (which I definetly hope they won't, they're bad but the alternatives are so much worse) you'd have chinese becoming a world language. Esperanto was never going to become THE international language, but it definetly had a shot at being wildly more popular than it is but got blocked by fucking french and nazis.
We have attained a point where openness and universalism is associated to identification to American culture. Not submitting to this, is thus viewed as narrow-minded or unhealthy nationalism or, in the attempts to reach other people not necessarily by submitting or assimilating to the Borg, as childish or stupid. And one symptom of this either gross chauvinist attitude (for Americans) or submissive attitude (for others) is Esperanto-bashing.
It feels arrogant to say, but I think it's pretty clear that English is the most "international" language we currently have. More people speak it as a second language than as a first.
It just further reinforces America's unearned cultural dominance and forces several thousands of millions of people to spend years learning an annoying and highly irregular language while the Americans literally don't have to lift a finger because they already speak it fluently. Oh, hang on. You didn't say American. You said English. Actually, I take it back. Good choice.
@@omp199I'm pretty sure most people who are fluent in english as a second language(like me) acquired it just by being involved with the internet, without dedicated study. But I do get that depends on how much time you spend on the internet so, I guess
Latin should be the international language. It was the original international language used by several monks and aristocrats for centuries, not to mention that since few people today know it, everyone has to take part in knowing it. Valete!👋
@@therealspeedwagon1451 Yeah equal in how unsuitable for everyone it is. Not sure if that's the kind of equality people want. This is like making a country wealth equal by exiling all the rich people so only the poor are left
Attic/Koine Greek is the only Lingua Franca there ever was, and ever needs to be. The simple act of learning Attic Greek automatically makes you a better than others. This is clearly the only option for a world language.
« It’s written in the American alphabet » (referring to the Latin alphabet) « We invented democracy » (δῆμος+ κράτος) Ancient Greeks and Romans would be like: 🤨
The ancient Greek “Democracy” is not the kind of democracy that survives today. Their “democracy” was very different (for example, only the male warrior class had any real power) with our modern democracy having derived more directly from the Native Americans. See the Iroquois Confederacy and the “5 civilized tribes”
@@flightlesschicken7769 Yes, but still, you cannot say «we invented democracy» like that. I mean, it’s obviously wrong. Maybe « we contributed to its current state, but not «invented»
@@LeoBloom-kc4iv well, yeah. I wouldn’t say that Americans invented democracy. I also wouldn’t say the Greeks did under our modern definition of democracy either. But the word sure does trace its existence back to the ancient Greek and something sort of resembling our modern democracy was used by some ancient Greeks
What bugs me the most about Esperanto is the heavily Latin-based vocabulary. Not good for a true planetary, unbiased language... At this point, just sticking to Latin would have been the same option - And at least, we'd yet have had an established language to start with. Only credit I can give to Zamenhof and his language is that at least he can be considered the OG conlinguist.
My vote is for Polish. Not because I'm a Polkaphile, but because it's got a lot of good things going for it linguistically and, unlike its Slavic siblings, it uses an alphabet a lot of the planet is already familiar with. Also, Poland will rise again and dominate the globe. We're already seeing signs of it become the next greatest economy in the Europe. It's either that or the Chinese will impose Mandarin on us all.
@@o_s-24 Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz moment. (It could be written easier if poles decided to make rz, sz, cz combinations as one letter but it was too much effort for them)
I believe the most ideal lingua franca would be Mongolian. It is just put simply, a gigachad language with cool history behind it and overall is pretty easy to learn. 😊
I'll save people's time by summarizing this video: -He thinks few people speak it = useless -It's Eurocentric (as if English isn't) -Too hard to learn (This is how you know he's just making stuff up)
You must be new because a lot of what he says is NOT serious and obviously sarcastic. _"Few people speak it = Useless."_ Obviously an exaggeration, but if you're gonna learn a language, might as well have it open the most doors for you. Which Esperanto kind of lacks. _"It's Eurocentric (as if English isn't)"_ He literally acknowledges this. Try paying attention. 6:01 He jokes about how Esperanto is convoluted and Euro-centric like "American." _"Too hard to learn."_ Again, maybe learn how to detect sarcasm. He calls "English" "American" like 100 times. Do you need him to make a disclaimer? Are you that senseless?
@@urphakeandgey6308 Just because he called English "American" a few times doesn't mean everything he said was all jokes and he actually loves Esperanto. I was fully aware he tried hard to be funny, it was kinda hard to watch actually. That's why I thought I'd save people some time by naming his main points. "He literally acknowledges this" So ironic you had to bring up paying attention, because you missed the entire point of my comment. My comment says: "I'll save people's time by SUMMARIZING this video:", that means it's meant for people that would NOT have watched the video.
@satrancbuyukusta4751 Ah so something specifically for Arabs.. very relevant info, thanks. Also thanks for letting me know a really easy language is hard for you. Not sure why you're telling me that, ig language learning isn't for everyone
@@Tunkert the point is that its easy for you because you already speak an european language. if you couldnt tell i am speaking english right now too which is an european language so it wouldnt be hard for me but its not globally easy. fusha wouldn’t be easy for me despite it being easy for the arab world because i don’t speak any dialect of arabic
@@kiwenmanisuno Least linguistically intelligent toki ponist (me) is taking linguistic courses in uni but good try!!! Plus toki pona is also gigachad at mostly everything i'll proudly keep defending sonia lang supremacy
@@joaquinalvarez2784 When you go back to class, try imagining how hard it would be for your teacher to explain everything in Toki Pona. Or imagine if you were translating a law book into Toki Pona.....
@@chickenstrangler3826 Toki Pona accounts for that, it truly is easier and more understandable than it would be for a mandarin speaker to understand a law book translated into Esperanto
An international language has to be Eurocentric as European languages are already spoken all over the world, moreover practically every scientific words come from European languages. The world just don't need influences from Austronesian languages or Zulu dialects
Agglunative means you add or extend the root word with other things like prefixes, the root word is basically like a playdoh circke that you can use as a base for other things
Why noone likes esperanto rather And I totally agree with Toki Pona as global language Also a common European language could be reconstruction of Proto-indoeuropean
Toki Pona is too hard to say something a little more complex than something very basic, Proto-Indoeuropean is too hard to learn (and maybe not very well known (we don't know what H1, H2 and H3 are, I don't know how much we know about syntax but I think it's not very much))
@@heinrich.hitzinger Those still used Latin as the language of scholarship and diplomacy for most of their history Really the only ones who would have valid reason to argue are the Greeks
I understand and respect your opinion, but I disagree when you said that Americans deserve to be their mother tongue as an international language. I took at least 4 years studying English to be able to have a conversation, and I'm still learning. I mean, I'm not even fluent... 75 days ago , I decided to learn Esperanto, and in terms of comparison, I would say that I've learned as much Esperanto as 1,5 years of English. I'm not an activist or Esperantisto as they call themselves, I wanted to learn it just for a hobby, and because I liked the way it sounds. I honestly don't believe it'll be the international language, but just in case I'll be ready 😂 on the other hand, the learning is being pleasurable and funny.
So you claim you could not learn to form plurals in English by adding '-(e)s', but able to do so in Esperanto with its '-[oa]jn?'. Somehow I doubt what you say is true.
This video is imagining up a problem for a solution. Being cynical over an invention of a universal language and toiling over it's relative triumph over the mere _idea_ of "better ideas" is counterproductive. A fear of potential to the innocent and beneficial intent of an auxiliary language. This man seeks perfection, and he will be waiting forever for the Perfect Culturally Agnostic Utopia language to catch on. (He is also "defending" demographics that he isn't. Just sayin.) Esperanto is not here to appropriate cultures. It's not a corporate entity or a religion or an ideology or propaganda. It's not fueled by greed. It's not controlled by anyone or any entity. It's not driven by anything except a well meaning cause and people who voluntarily want it. And it works for its purpose. Quite well. Here's the reality: the idea of anything at all being absolutely unbiased is not possible. And language is culturally biased by nature of its purpose. The only way to invent a language indifferent to all cultures would be to make it unintuitive for everyone (scissors suck for lefties too!). You can't have an ambidextious language that people would adopt. A "diverse relation" is a paradoxical concept. And a utopic one when applied to society. Some give and take and sacrifice (the harmless kind) is necessary. Furthermore, the idea of something catching on without an influence is...unlikely. And to attempt that is throwing a dart without even establishing a target. Even if someone invented this impossibly idyllic language that Simp seems to expect of us, it would lack an audience. We need a foundation. And then we need a population to care about it. Keep in mind, the subject of language isn't pop culture *media.* It's just culture. It's not insidious. Or an imperial conquest. Or driven by want. It's cooperative and based on needs. Specifically, our need to find safe connections to one another. Oh, here's one: Esperanto? To force and drown-out is discrimination. To moderate and offer is sharing. While officializing it into the system would be a serious decision, the United Nations and UNESCO recognize Esperanto as a medium for international understanding. I don't think the UN is racist. Or white. It's amazing that we have a language at all that has a global presence and has been accepted as generally good enough to be universal by virtually every first world country. And @JakeHub_ stated below me, the Chinese logogram for Esperanto translates to "World Language." And Japan has an Esperanto Institute, as many countries do. I don't believe any Europeans marched in and "did" this to them. I don't think the enthusiasts in African countries are secret agents, either. Yes, I'm suggesting colored people be allowed to use a beneficial idea without being proxy shamed by self-hating white guys. This isn't about stomping out or holding up traditions; it's about making and supporting something that works. The ingredients came from somewhere. Who cares where if the invention is beneficial and it _functions_ to this purpose well? Everything is relative. That's why we _should_ judge on intent. Not history. Not "culture." Not what you assume is racist for demographics that aren't in the same room as you while you tell us what is good/bad for them. There can't and will never be a universal language that is the same degree of effort for all cultures. Sorry. But this is a positive influence. And it is accessible. Negative influence, as those who are interested in inaction over potential consequence, are an example of why Esperanto remains on the verge, despite it being--beyond reasonable doubt--a great idea. We could be teaching the next generation how to speak to everyone. But no. This one's too European. Clearly, _The White Man's Burden: Part II._ Second opinion? Are there any Chinese, Congo, Australians, Jamaicans, or South Americans in the comments who feel as though Esperanto will eclipse their characters? Or are we all English speaking Americans stepping on our own toes? Carry on, I guess. But I can't help but notice the strongest opinions in the comments are just people...bullying Esperanto users, imagining they're all coffe sipping american hipsters? It's a global language. Not a fashion trend. Literally, what are you even talking about? My suggestion? Get real. Also, mind the strawman, but this UA-camr's channel is devoted to criticizing languages that he probably doesn't know, unless he disowns languages that he spends time learning. Which makes about as much sense as this video. Let's see him post a video where he speaks any language other than English before we listen to him critique them.
I was hardcore into learning esperanto until I remembered that languages evolve, and that if everyone spoke it, In a few hundred years some parts of the population will be unable to understand other parts and the purpose will be defeated.
No joke: American Sign Language is the best first second language. I’ve gotten more real world use from the little bit of ASL I learned back in the 80s than any other language. And like Mandarin, when you start doing sign language the locals start doing backflips in celebration. ❤ Upon finding out that I knew a little bit of ASL, I was offered a job ON THE SPOT at a place where I was temping. Insane!
It is undoubtedly the best first second language for someone living in the United States, alongside Spanish. It certainly is not going to be of much use outside the USA though of course, since it is distantly related to French Sign Language but not to anything else.
@@30803080308030803081 Hey, I don't know about the situation in there, but here in Brazil, LIBRAS (br sign language) had a very long and recent history of being legalized, few decades ago it was straight up prohibited (by the person in charge of the national deaf's school mind you) in favor of oralization. So you sort of need to get political about it, people being unaware of it's history caused many dehumanizing problems to them.
@@salvadorromero9712 the best second languages are your local sign language and you local lingua franca and/or second most spoken language, for exemple if you're from Brazil (like i am), the best languages to learn (for real world use) would be Libras, Spanish and English
I know several Russians that speak Esperanto and some of the language was even based on Russian, so I was also shocked when he used that as an example.
@@konstantin_troitskiy Russia is a multicultural country to say that someone is not Russian because they are Chukchi or Kalmyk is silly. Esperanto is not based on Italian, it has mainly Romance, Germanic and Slavic roots.
@@Zodamay For the majority of his life, LL Zamenhof lived in the cities of Bialystok and Warsaw, which were part of the Russian empire until his final years. Bialystok was a multiethnic city, with Poles, Germans, Russians, and Jews living in it. Despite this, Zamenhof noticed as a child that there were frequent conflicts between the different groups. He suspected that this was because they did not speak the same languages, and thus he was convinced that an international language would be an important step in achieving human peace. Zamenhof himself had two native languages, learning Russian from his father and Yiddish from his mother. He was also fluent in Polish and German, and had studied other languages, such as French and English.
1:56 I laughed when I saw the flag of Mozambique used to represent Romance languages, but it turns out, their official language is Portuguese. The more you know. 🌠
Living in Denmark I speak Danish - but I don´t whine about the fact that I can only use it together with other Danish speaking people and that it´s not understood and spoken all over the world. It works for me together with other Danish speaking people. The same with Esperanto. It works together with those who speak too. Yes, it didn´t become the second language to the whole world. But that´s how ideas work. U.N. was probably meant to bring peace and understanding too to the world. It didn´t, but it´s still there.
@@AdrianDuknes Never be afraid to learn something you genuinely enjoy or are passionate about. Honestly seeing this video and my defensive reaction to the frankly kind of silly attack on esperanto has motivated me to go through with learning Toki Pona. The language is just fascinating to me. Lojban is as well, but Toki Pona is considerably simpler so probably gonna start with that lol
I think the international language should be Norwegian since it’s easy to learn and we all know it’s the best Scandinavian language and does not give you throat problems like danish and doesn’t have a weird word for window like Swedish plus it’s easy to learn since even children can speak it plus it’s just the best
I don't understand if it's mocking the argument against esperanto or it's really using the worst argument you can find Mi ne povas kompreni ĉu li volas moki la argumentadoj kontraŭ esperanto aŭ li vere elektis la plej malbonajn oni povas trovi
1 Your reasons to hate it are bad. You hate Esperanto because its eurocentric however most people in the world already speak a European language mainly, English, Spanish, French, Afrikaans, Portuguese, Russian. It wouldn't be easy to make it have Arabic and Chinese roots since those languages require a completely different level of enunciation with their vowels and letters that if added to Esperanto would make it a lot harder for anyone to learn and even still, alot arabs already know French or English and alot of Chinese already know English 2 Too many words isn't a very good argument either because the more words the better for someone to completely explain what they are trying to communicate 3 it's not poisonous to the minds of the youth. It's better for them to try to learn a one world language than to learn Japanese because of anime 4 I don't like the name either. But you have worse names for languages 5 And lastly, even if English is pretty close to being the world language there are some major hurdles. Mainly French in North Africa, Spanish in Latin America and Russia in the post Soviet states. These are massive swaths of the world population who probably hate America for one reason or another and would be less inclined to learn English because of it. Esperanto would probably be more enticing for not only them but also other people all around the world.
For point five, Zamenhoff was a man who wanted to strip people of their non European heritage with his Euro centric language. Thus people will be less inclined to learn it.
1. Arabic and Chinese? Are those the only two non-European languages? The world is huge, Europe is minuscule. And while yes, much of the world speaks Indo-European languages a second language, it’s a much smaller percentage than you’d think. Most of them aren’t native-level either, conversational at best. The very thought that ‘everyone knows them anyway’ is pretty damn Eurocentric and racist. Not gonna lie. 5. Are we skipping over the implications of setting an obviously Latin language as a ‘world language’, something meant to symbolize world peace and unity? Yes, there may be countries that have anti-American or anti-British sentiments and yes, they might favor Esperanto. But you know what unites those countries and the rest of the non-Western world? AN ANTI-WESTERN SENTIMENT. I assure you, try to make this shit a world language these days and you’re gonna start ww3. The anti-Western alliance will be sure to stomp down on it with the Eurocentrism argument, and you’re gonna need more than “it’s efficient” to convince them. West-aligned countries? Japan? Korea? India? The Philippines? Taiwan? They aren’t gonna be happy either. What about the United States itself? Too many roadblocks and potential enemies, and I think the Esperanto society is too naive about this. Maybe not the society, but individuals certainly are.
Hmm, in the beginning I thought I need to write a comment negating every point made, but as it gets more and more absurd, it's negating itself. Unfortunately there will be people not catching the irony. (One of these brainwashed people here. I even once sat in a room with the inventor of Toki Pona, and many years later helped to translate a song from Esperanto to Toki Pona, without having learned Toki Pona myself. I didn't know this channel before, but I guess UA-cam suggested this video to me because it has "Esperanto" in the title?)
At a company celebration for employees who had reached various milestones of employment (5 years, 10 years, etc.), I was asked to stand up and reveal an unknown fact about myself. I said that I was learning Esperanto. There was a deathly silence. As all the other attendees stared at me like I was a freak. Which I was. 😂 Jokes aside, Esperanto was very useful when I first became interested in learning Romance languages. It didn’t carry the trauma of my 7th grade Spanish class, or the cruelty I experienced at the hands of Very Evil French Instructors in college. I consider it the training wheels of language, and just like training wheels, should be discarded soon afterward. And yeah, Esperanto was absolutely of NO USE whatsoever when I fell in love with Georgian, Russian, Ukrainian, Greek, and Norwegian. Won’t help with Bulgarian either. Boo.
I think it still helps to learn other languages, it helped me with Chinese and for starters the biggest help is to prove the students is not bad at languages, give them some self confident and a successful experience in learning the first foreign language. Also communicating with other speakers is a nice experience most of the times, it makes you want to learn more languages cause most of them are or get naturally into languages afterwards
@@Kanguruo it doesn't have even the most common Slavic features, such as aspects. Every Russian translator into Esperanto invents its own incompatible way to express even the basic Slavic thoughts.
Tbh I'm only learning Esperanto because basically, no one knows it, and I see my cousins once a year in the summertime, so when I see them next year the first day I arrive and see them I wanna confuse the hell out of them by speaking a language that kinda sounds/ has similar words then Spanish just to prank them.
@@Toddthefrog07 Es[eranto is the isolating language, its vocabulary was initially based on latin and European languages, but its grammar is closer to Chinese, that is why the Chinese are so excellent Esperanto speakers. Now Esperanto has become fully natural language made by millions of Esperantists over 140 years of using the language in every walks of life. Esperanto progress is not fast, but steady.
@@fitzburg63 That's why it took me far, far longer to get used to saying "la libro" than it should have. The Spanish speaking portion of my brain would always scream at me in protest.
i think esperanto can be good to learn because its based on a bunch of european languages so i think it would help you to learn other european languages
Kinda. But I think you can as well just learn one of these romance languages with similar benefits. For example, because I've learned French in university, I can grasp many similar ideas in Spanish. If I'd learned Esperanto... wouldn't be so easy. It lacks for example complex verb system, traditional for Romance languages.
4:24 I remember randomly learning about Esperanto online back in like the mid-2010s when I had just graduated high school. I was seriously considering devoting some time to learning the language but luckily realized how not easy it was going to be. I'm not even sure why I was interested in it back then. Maybe I drank the Kool-Aid and really thought it would be the universal language of the future one day. Seems like English is the almost universal language right now.
The fact that Esperanto is spoken so little is the reason why it makes such a great candidate for a form of cipher. Furthermore, the gazillion root words in it make it almost impossible to decipher.
Gazillion root words??? It has far fewer root words than English or other national/ethnic languages. Esperanto builds its vocabulary using suffixes and prefixes plus word compounding.
@@aviadiloStill, English gets a pass because most of the colonised world uses the language as a secondary or a tertiary. I have yet to meet a person who even knows that Esperanto exists.
@@aviadiloWith all due respect, you're just hanging around a different crowd. Only around 2 million people know Esperanto, which is under 0.1% of all humans. Chinese and English are both in the billions, with Japanese and Spanish and other world languages reaching the 100 millions.
@@hahahhahahahufool2114 How many millions of people do you communicate with? I don't care if over one billion people speak Chinese. I have little to do with China apart from buying Chinese products. And if I need to contact people in China, there are plenty of Chinese Esperantists I can contact. I've been studying Italian the last five years, have done several intensive courses in Italy. Far more people speak Spanish, but I love Italy, visit often and so Italian is far more useful to me than Spanish or Chinese or Indonesian. In fact, Esperanto is far more useful to me than those three languages. The number of speakers is irrevelant.
I have been to over 30 countries and I have never run into an Esperanto speaker. The old tv show Mission Impossible used to use signs in Esperanto if the scene was supposed to be in another country.
Personnaly I think québécois french should be the international language, its not widely spoken so almost every one would have to learn it and it sound good compare to american , but I think it would require a lot of efforts for people (even french) to learn the pronounciation and I'm probably biased by the fact that québécois french is my native language and I like it so much. Another problem would be the fact you can't write it, in school we learn to write a standard french because of that.
I think the international language of the world should be welsh, it has incredibly easy pronunciation, and is already widely spoken by over 100 people!
Latin is superior
As a Welsh person I absolutely agree. For some people like me in South Wales barely speak the language or more commonly not at all. What fools they are. Welsh is the most useful and powerful language in the world.
wel, rydw in siariad i bach cymraeg, ond fy saesneg yn wych.
Nope. No no no no no. Language Simp will never make a video about Welsh (or even any Celtic language for that matter).
@@archiepeters43812 nerdd 🤓
For the world language I suggest Army Slavic. Army Slavic is a language created by the Austro - Hungarian Empire to make communication between the different Slavic people within the Army easier. It consists of about 80 words that are almost exclusively useful for pre WW2 Warfare, which is the simplicity a world language needs.
Picking a language that is mostly used for warfare doesn't seem like that great of an idea, but I guess we already picked American English for that one. 😂
Aren't a lot of those 80 words for military stuff though?
@@that_orange_hat Yes which is the simplicity a world language needs.
Takes 'war is the language of the universe' to a new extreme
@@Ninjaeule97 I don't see the problem. War is the only thing we have in common as humanity.
The international language should be Finnish. No-one speaks it as a first language and it's hard enough to learn that anyone who can speak it should be worth talking to.
suostua
"No-one speaks it as a first language" joke, yes?
Nobody speaks standard Finnish, that's a language you learn in school. The home dialects of Finnish are very different to the standard language.
This reminds me of Star Wreck.
Potkita nuo paskesaiat pois tasta galaksista
@@notsia💀💀
I'm learning Esperanto so when authorities question me or take me to court, they won't have an official translator and have to dismiss the cases
based
Is this a thing ?
@@Barisdagame Nope.
They'll just get a romanian translator
Ther has to be one language ther is no translator ready for ur case
Cantonese should be the global lingua franca because everyone deserves a chance to shock natives
You kidding right??
@@--elpously9697no, everyone deserves the opportunity to shock natives
馬仔，不如整碗雲吞面過你食？
@@godofallpotatoes1614
OK you have the choice to speak it
But you can't force us to do the same
Yup bro hai yaa!!
"English has simple grammar and phonology rules"
So brave of you to say this Mr Simp
*American
@@mjodyhsame
@@mjodyh Australian*
And no exceptions
Grammar is fairly easy. Orthography and pronunciantion is a pain in the butt.
As a random Russian in Siberia I feel obliged to say that I am perfectly fine with the Italian pronunciation.
As a random north Korean i agree
I am also Russian. I love Italian.. it's my favorite language 💗🇮🇹
Bravo
@@sicilia7070 r u a girl?
@@alekseiloboda2553 yes
Basque should honestly be the de facto language of the entire world because it's not (as far as we know) related to any other language on Earth, meaning that everyone will have an equally difficult time trying to learn it.
There are more isolated languages.. for example georgian! გამარჯობა!
now that i think about it this is literally sambahsa lmao
@@DmitryLovermann All those scribbles to say hello lmao
The idea of a language that is equally difficult for everyone may seem appealing, but in practice, an international language must be accessible and quick to learn. Unlike Basque, Esperanto was designed to be simple, regular, and intuitive, allowing people from different cultures and languages to communicate effectively without years of effort. Its neutrality and ease of learning make it a much more practical choice for a common language (David Malone, Esther Schor).
The problem with learning Esperanto is that you have to speak it with the kinds of people who learn Esperanto
💀💀💀
@@rowboat10I’d rather speak Klingon than Esperanto
And what's wrong with that? When you learn a natural language there's no guarantee that you can find a community. The only kind of people who learn Esperanto are those who want to join a friendly international space. It may not be useful but learning languages isn't just about "business" or "travel." But there is a service where esperanto speakers host follow esperantists for cheaper so that's something I guess.
@@flannelsone1159 I'd rather try to save a regional language rather than speak an invented language!!
@@Rolando_CuevaThey do both, and are better for it.
Let's gather one person from each country in the world who don't speak any other languages than their native one to an inhabited island and let them live there until they develop the ultimate international language
It would just be English.
Because of how many countries speak English. They would just choose that one I think.
This has already been done before. It's called Viossa.
Yeah
الاقتراح اعجبني لكنهم سيختارون لغة محددة لتواصل مع بعضهم مثل الإنجليزية
Probably that experiment wouldn't result in one single international language, it would actually just form multiple groups of people who speak similar languages and these groups would form their own dialects.
You'd have the romance languages speakers forming a group of their own, slavic language speakers forming another group, scandinavians forming another, English and Arabic speakers would probably only interact with those who speak their own language, since many countries speak these ones, and those who speak languages that are "isolated" like the person from Hungary, the one from Finland and etc. would either have to learn another language during the experiment or they'd simply be lonely
Fun fact: Esperanto is officially called "世界语" (Shìjièyǔ) in China, meaning "World Language"
笑
funner even fact: China government still subsidize the Esperanto teaching and learning from the Mao days in which there really believes speak it will be the future.
@@psittakosfei2688your not Chinese, am l right?
Of course I am, and very soon, everybody will be as well.@@stephen3143141
Then what's Volapük called?
I learnt Esperanto and discovered I could already read French, which I took up in turn. So, not a wasted venture. Also it has helped in part with my German and Greek. Also living in a new state I met a group by the Esperanto shirt a gentleman was wearing. This gave me an immediate group. Also.. great for sci fi lovers as you can understand obscure comments in Gattaca, Blade 3, Red Dwarf and so on. So for me it has been very positive and easy.
Lol I tried learning Esperanto and I quit for French in less than a month in
@@anti_islam639 Dank' al Esperanto
I'm curious, have you ever used Esperanto online?
@@benia1908 lernu
Esperanto helped me A LOT with french and german too
This video is the only reason i am learning Esperanto
bonvenon al nia kulto samideano
@@theinternationallanguagees9213 danke!
Great!
For real
Ye, couldn't agree more. Tre vera.
The perfect lingua franca would be a mix of the most final boss languages, Polish and Finnish with a little hint of a very niche language like Luxembourgish, topped with some Chinese grammar and Danish pronunciation. Just fantastic.
I like your idea, but the Chinese grammar is too straightforward.
I suggest Hungarian.
@@StrategySphere Make it tonal as well
Wouldn't you want a ligua franca to be easy to learn by everyone? This is just esperanto expect you made it hard for everyone.
@@Ninjaeule97 yes
Chinese grammar is simple, the wild horse is Russian
I had no real problems learning Esperanto as a first foreign language. It didnt take long and gave me a great basis for other languages. Instead of going through trying to understand new concepts, I could just spend a little time learning Esperanto and go "Oh, this concept in this language is like this in Esperanto". I've gotten way more out of Esperanto than French or Spanish. It just depends what you do.
Somewhat agree. I actually found it easier to learn Spanish in my second language French, rather than my first language, English, because the word order of Spanish and French is amazingly similar. So, it's easy to think in Spanish using French. I think you would have been better off learning one Romance language well, then learning the subsequent romance languages off your first one.
It didn't surprise me that on UA-cam there are actually instructors in French teaching Spanish and vice versa!
I've heard this before, and I would learn it if there were lots of other Esperanto speakers around, but there aren't (at least, not where I live).
makes sense
@@jfppp1 where do you live?
@@AyskaLyn Rural Ohio in the USA. The nearest big city (Columbus) is an hour away.
3:20 "It just has too many words"
- Oh ? I've got a language that can solve that.
"It should only have a few hundred words"
- OH ??
"And that's why I think toki pona should be the international language instead"
- AYYYYYYYY
Lon
Toki pona with less than 200 words seems great, until you want to be at least somewhat precise. Let say you want to ask somebody to buy you strawberries. The word strawberry in toki pona doesn't exist, so you have to say something like
"kili loje sike pi kama lili tawa anpa pi kasi lon sewi"
which according to some dictionary I found means
"A red fruit which is cone shaped and has leafs on the top"
I'm not sure if this translation is correct, but even if it is, despite the fact that it has 21 syllables, it is still too few to tell for sure if it is strawberry or raspberry.
Also numbers in toki pona sucks.
@@urojony3177 that's true, but I don't know that it sucks because of that. It succeeds at the thing it was trying to do which was to be a maximally compact language
Just try to translate the constitution in Toki pona....
As a Spanish speaker, I support calling Esperanto "Spanish 2" but only after we give it our always useful and supereasy to learn verb conjugations! Esperanto totally needs two imperfect subjunctive forms!
Both are ugly. One because of how the sounds are put together, second because of how everything is put together (except for the abstract level maybe).
¿Por qué los llamas "español 2"?
@@alejo7625 no viste el video?
To me it doesn’t sound like Spanish. It sounds more italian
@@5thkiechannel for me, it sounds Romanian.
As an Esperantophile I completely agree with your opinion, Esperanto has ruined my life. Esperanto took away my wife, my children and most importantly, my will to learn new languages.
Ĉu vere? Mi ankoraŭ lernas lingvojn. Ili ĉiuj ŝajnas malpli bonaj, tro komplikaj, tro malfacilaj, kaj eĉ malbelaj kompare al E-o, sed malgraŭ tio, mi daŭre ĝuas lerni ilin.
@@frechjobone diris
Learn braille then
@@Beau_Rivage What I said was:
¿En serio? Yo todavía aprendo idiomas. Comparado al Esperanto, parecen menos buenos, demasiado complicados, demasiado difíciles, e incluso feos, pero a pesar de eso, todavía disfruto aprenderlos.
Hope that's accommodating enough for you.
如果你还不懂我可以用中文说
The international languages should be English & Dutch, which are the prettiest and most refined languages with the most pretty and poetic words and also the easiest languages ever - Welsh is a pretty language as well, so it should be taught in school as one of the optional Celtic languages, so everyone should also learn at least one Celtic language and at least one Latin language!
esperanto killed my family and forced me to complete the esperanto course on duolingo and have a 6 hour conversation in esperanto with 10 different people. overall i'd give it a 8/10.
You mean there are TWO of us in the world? I mean, what are the odds?
Gratulon !
Ni havu tiun konversacion denove 😁
"A useful language like German or Maltese"
that fucking killed me, nobody mentions Maltese in the middle of a conversation.
If you want to learn a useless Romance language, why not choose something badass like Latin?? They also have a community of nerds who will welcome you!
Do you think ancient greek is useless too?
Guy's unaware of the existence of ancient books and poetry
@@jasonjohnson6938Latin is useless. Who cares that western cultures come out of Roman and Greek ones. Pfff.
@@jasonjohnson6938 what even are books? Like the things that movies are based on?
And they are cool nerds.
This is what I've done with Esperanto:
- Traveled and was hosted by Esperanto speakers in different countries;
- I hosted Esperanto backpackers from different nationalities in my house and we practiced other languages;
- Been to Esperanto meetings in my town, watched cultural lectures with people from other countries, had some nice exchange with people;
- Been to an international congress with hundreds of people from all continents;
- We spent one week at a hotel with all those people, full immersion, music, cultural events, crazy parties, night clubs, restaurants... everything in Esperanto.
- In the congress, I've seen all sorts of weird people: spiritualists, atheists, gays, vegans, Buddhists, old wise men that look like beggars, Linux users... Esperanto attracts such weirdos! One thing is sure: you won't get bored.
- One night at 3 in the morning we were with a group of Esperantists on the beach "moon bathing"... all naked!
The atmosphere was like in this video: ua-cam.com/video/H_OYn6PZKpw/v-deo.html
Apart from that, yeah, I'd say learning Esperanto is almost totally useless. If you want a language for your career, studies, for sitting down and wait speakers to walk by... Esperanto is a no. However, you could learn it just as mental gymnastics, like people play chess, knit, spend hundreds of hours on social media and play video games... so why not Esperanto? You need to be some sort of adventurer, backpacker and have a certain degree of detachment to enjoy Esperanto to the fullest.
At the congress, I bought this book "Ili vivis sur la tero" (They lived on Earth - eight years of migration around our planet). It's the amazing story of a couple who circled the planet speaking Esperanto and meeting Esperanto people. They say: When all your belongings for eight years fit in a backpack, you realize that the joy of life is not about what you have, but really about what you are.
So yeah, you have to be a bit crazy to study and enjoy Esperanto and its philosophy.
Some correct information:
- You will find Esperanto groups perhaps in all major cities around the world, much more than for most natural languages with millions of speakers.
- Esperanto is not among the most spoken languages, but it’s definitely among the most studied languages. I’ve conduced some polls in international forums, it ranked among the top 10. We can confirm that with Duolingo, there were times when Esperanto learners were more than a million, more than most of their courses.
- It’s actually against the goal of Esperanto to be the language of a specific place.
- Esperanto looks European on the surface, but it shares similarities with Oriental languages in the structure, as pointed out by linguist Claude Piron.
- China is one of the world’s greatest supporters of Esperanto. Even the official webpage of the Chinese government has an Esperanto version.
- Its rich vocabulary allows it to be used in Science and the most refined Literature. An international language must be able to share world knowledge. But that still makes it easier than natural languages - making new words and concepts is like playing with Lego.
- English hasn’t become international because of its culture, or because of its intrinsic linguistic properties. It has become international for one chief reason: political and military power. (David Crystal, author of the Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language).
Saluton! Mi eklernis Esperanton kaj mi estas komencanto. Mi ŝatus renkonti novajn homojn por praktiki Esperanton... Ĉu vi povus helpi min? Mi konas neniun, kiu parolas Esperanton.
You can get the same wonderful experience with enough vodka ;-)
@@thiagooliveira1482People aren't really going to learn it
Linux users😂
"We can confirm that with Duolingo, there were times when Esperanto learners were more than a million, more than most of their courses"
So where are these millions of fluent Esperanto speakers from Duolingo?
As a Russian speaker I would like to say that Russian and Italian languages (and also Portuguese) have similar system of sounds, so for us it's much easier to pronounce than English, for example. And vice versa.
But Italian doesn't have the vowel reduction system as in Russian
@@tobyalder42true, but the sound qualities are the most important thing. Russian doesn't have a distinction between i, like in ship, and e like in sheep, for example, so we never sound natural when saying these two words. And th and s sounds in one word still appear in my nightmares, even though for a russian I'm a f-ing 😱EENOSTRANYETS😱 with my ~B2. Or maybe it's B1. I once scored C1-C2 on an online test😂, but that was definitely bullsh*t.
agreed!
@@ldmtag Actually, Russian does have that distinction, many speakers just don't realise it. Russian "и" is pronounced differently in stressed and unstressed positions, according to the IPA (which may not be fully accurate, though) the sounds are like in English, "i" and "ɪ". A Russian speaker would pronounce, for example, English "benign" more or less correctly, but he would pronounce incorrectly Italian "benigno"
@@tobyalder42 yes, that's correct. But most of the unstressed Иs are the same, and most of the stressed Иs are the same as well. Doesnt help with ship/sheed distinction.
Italian was chosen as a model for pronunciation because it has the simplest phonology out of all extant languages. So a good model for one who's trying to make his language as simple as possible, wouldn't you think?
Bonus, Italian kinda sounds like Toki Pona with more Os at the end of words
@@NatoBoram mainly cuz o is practically a sufix
if you ignore all those native american african and asian languages yes
@@satrancbuyukusta4751 What do you mean? That other languages exist doesn't change the orthography of Esperanto or Italian. It still stands that there are fewer sounds in these languages than in all the others, so by definition they are simpler. For further explanation - all the sounds in Italian and Esperanto are present in all other languages (so no new sounds need to be learned) but there are sounds in all other languages not found in Italian and Esperanto. Therefore, the orthographies of Italian and Esperanto are easier for everyone to learn.
@@NatoBoram In italian you pronounce every letter in a word (except in some cases like the letter H that often doesn't get pronounced), but in english if you want to say Wednesday you say it like Wensday, skipping almost half of the word
Challennge for Language Simp:
Create your own Language with these rules
-Grammar should be as simplistic as possible with no gender, conjugations, cases etc. (Like chinese)
-Alphabet should be pictures so it looks cool and not American (Like Korean)
-No homophones or homonyms allowed
-No synonyms allowed
-The alphabet will probably be bigger than korean in order to have more sounds and therefore easier not to create homonyms
-Words are created with the given alphabet by the community where it is tracked which words already exist and which sounds are already taken
-Buy a huge plot of land somewhere
-Only people who pass a standardised language test in made up language is allowed to live there
-Then the language will evolve from there
toki pona is pretty close with it's 120 sitelen pona (its """alphabet"""), has no cases, and all synonyms are the same word. it also has a community where people develop the language and add new words and reanalyse old words and just speak the language.
@@notwithouttext Yeah, Toki Pona is already a really admirable effort towards this goal.
@@notwithouttext Toki Pona looks great for expressing the bare essentials
@@notwithouttext Its grammar still isn't as simple as it could be, and it is VERY ambiguous. Toki Pona is better than Esperanto but still far from functional.
@@maxkho00 it's not meant to be as simple as possible, but just comfortably simple to use alongside another language.
People: Create an artificial language to make it easier to communicate with each other
Also people: Continue to communicate in English and don’t use Esperanto
People who learned Esperanto:
👁👄👁
yes the 2 people who went out of their way to learn esperanto must be real disappointed rn
@@yoro__33 Doctor Esperanto: 👁👄👁
@@yoro__33the 2 million people who learned Esperanto are very affected
@@kiwenmanisuno Mi povas konfirmi.
100% agree. To be honest an international language should be easy to understand and fast to use. Like Python.
An international language should have semicolons
Assembly code is better
💀
Lojban is designed for you guys.
Not Python. Humans won't apply significant whitespace correctly, see below. I'm with the semicolons and curly brackets.
The Piano
{was sold to the lady}
with carved legs
As a person that speaks 8 languages, I'm gonna learn it just to spite this person.
Ithkuil is obviously the best language. It is very easy to learn for everyone and it is already spoken by more than 5 people
XD
I totally support this point.
Nahuatl most best language, it spoken by all Mexica
I'm more of a NEW ITHKUIL kinda guy.
ITHKUIL III
I like that you call English "American international language". Totally not biased :D
and he said "American alphabet" instead of "Latin alphabet"
This entire channel is ironic joke videos that shouldn't be taken seriously
Haha, the author keeps emphasizing the US.
its a joke
A complete Idiot! 100% "UScentric"
I think the name "esperanto" comes from the root that means "hope" in romance languages. For exemple in france it's "esperance", and i'm pretty sure it's similar in spanish
Of course. In fact, 'esperanto' is (in Esperanto) a participle meaning 'one who hopes', just as, say, 'kantanto' means 'one who sings'. The creator of the language signed his first publications as "Dro Esperanto" = "the hopeful doctor", and his pen-name stuck to the language (which he himself had simply named Lingvo internacia).
you're right, in spanish we say esperanza
in portuguese is esperança
The original name was "desperanto", more accurate name if you ask my opinion.
@@angelostsirimokos8104By the way, another English word for "one who hopes" is "aspirant," so I don't know why people don't say the obvious "Esperanto means aspirant" and instead dance around it with primitive caveman English.
Nothing has convinced me more to learn Esperanto than seeing four consecutive videos about it where the host complains that it’s too “euRo-CeNtRiC”
I like how the phonology is purported to be super easy and intuitive to use, yet the most spoken language that contains all phonemes Esperanto contains is Polish, which coincidentally happens to be Zamenhof's native language.
His native languages were Idish and Russian. I don't why he said he was Polish when he was a Jew from Russian Empire
@@mearbyeHe lived in Warsaw, and other places in Poland his whole life.
@@szlanty He lived in Russia his entire life and spoke Russian
Polish lacks Esperanto's /x-h/ distinction and I don't think Zamenhof actually spoke Polish as a first language, he spoke Yiddish and Russian
@@that_orange_hat At the time it was created Polish still distinguished /x/ from /h/.
The international language should be Esperanto, it has super easy pronunciation, and is spoken by over 2 people!
It is spoken by over 2 people, 2 million is over 2
When I was very young I wanted to learn Esperanto because I read a children's book about languages that left me with the impression that Esperanto was the language of the future.
How many Esperanto activists begged you not to make this video?
I learned English as my second language young.
But I gave up on learning esperanto the moment I realized how different it is from what I know and how little people speak it.
Same as me, I found about it in a children's book about communication, and fell in love with the idea.
Took me many years, but finally got to learning it, and I thank my inner child for keeping that memory alive for so long, despite all the people who tried to disuade me.
@@frechjo The children's book from which I found out about Esperanto was called "The Language Book" by Franklin Folsom. I also learned about the Code Talkers from reading that book.
@@tmhc72_gtg22c Oh, cool, you even remember the name :)
I can't remember what my book was called (something in Spanish), but it was about communication in general (not languages specifically).
It's amazing how those little things can stay with us forever! Lucky for us, our parents cared about and were able to widen our worlds like that.
Probably all five of them
It has so many Words because you can create Words! And no one is forcing the youth to learn Esperanto, unlike english wich presents the same problem as Esperanto for chinese people.
Esperanto gets so much unnecessary hate. I think ppl should just have fun with the language. Even if it doesn’t ever achieve it’s goal purpose I think it’s still cool to learn and honestly I wish more people around my age spoke it. I feel like it would be so fun to be able to communicate with more people in Esperanto
If you want to help me learn it, I’ll happily speak it with you
@@multiespeciesfishies2811 What do you learn?
Ive never understood the resistance to learning it. People are willing to learn “useless” languages all the time like Pig Latin or gibberish to communicate but a actual structured language they want nothing to do with.
Add in the fact that its easy to learn and actually helps speed up learning other languages and I still don’t see why its hated.
@@captaindestruction9332 Esperanto is not useless.
@@fitzburg63 i don’t think they’re talking about Esperanto being useless
I think Icelandic should be the lingua de franca of the whole world. It’s incredibly simple (I learned it when I was only a baby) and everyone around me speaks it. Besides, who doesn’t want to sound like a badass viking. First class will be learning the voiceless alveolar lateral affricate.
I actually adore the sound of Icelandic, but to spice things up I think we should do Icelandic-Basque pidgin instead, maybe throw in some Hungarian.
The big superiority term adore and the numbers must be edited out, such words and numbers only reflect me The Goddess and cannot be misused by ppl in any way in yt names or names or in comments etc - adore is love related term, and love related terms only reflect me the only lovable being, and one should use words such as like or find this language pretty etc, not words such as adore or love! Astral terms such as Sol and words such as ber also cannot be misused in names or yt names and must be changed - only we pure / superior beings (me & the pure protectors aka the alphas) reflect astral terms / names / items etc!
The international languages should be English & Dutch & Old Norse, which are the prettiest and most refined languages with the most pretty and poetic words and also the easiest languages ever, and Norwegian is also one of the prettiest ever! Icelandic is also gorgeous and I am learning it, but Old Norse is a bit easier to read and it looks a bit more refined because it doesn’t have those extra Us before the last Rs / consonants, so it’s more suitable to be an universal language - but everyone should learn both Icelandic and Old Norse, and the other main Nordic / Germanic languages! Esperanto is a nice language, not the prettiest Latin language, but still nice enough to learn, so it’s on my list of languages I want to learn and improve, and it’s similar to Spanish & Latin, and the word Esperanto is nice and fits the language well, so what this video says isn’t true at all, probably just parody!
I like Icelandic, it's basically english but better. I think diacritics are a bit too prevalent in it though
A friend of mine was Canada's ambassador to Iceland and he told me that Icelandic is very challenging for English speakers, but I told him Japanese would probably come in at a close second.
I've been learning Esperanto recently and I agree with a lot of this, but I'm just learning it because it's something unique and interesting to put on a college application/scholarship.
Many people start learning it by linguistic curiosity and then find out that it is so interesting to connect with Esperanto speakers all over the world
I just learned to gain romance vocabulary. Helped me quite a bit in Spanish.
it's also probably somewhat easy to learn
But you can also just learn a real language and put that in your CV.
5:56 Actually democracy was invented in Athens, Greece! 🇬🇷
yeah frrrr
Cool
Bro is 12 years old
One feature I love about Esperanto is its agglutination. The book La Bona Lingvo shows how you can be very expressive in Esperanto. It has a lot of words but you can also express complex concepts with a smaller vocabulary. It makes the language able to express a lot of nuance and be more brief. An entire clause can become just one word thanks to affixes and grammar. You can use compound words easily. In other languages, you need to memorise thousands of words. In Esperanto, you need about a thousand and a handful of prefixes and suffixes to do the same.
Aren't agglutinative languages what people with coeliac disease are allergic to?
@@nsf001-3 Yes. That always reminded me of the coeliac disease 😅. I guess coeliac disease sufferers can only speak analytic languages, then.
*EDIT:* Also; I guess people, who are allergic to glue, as well.
which is something that languages such as Japanese and Turkish have. I know enough Japanese to get around but when words get long it can be confusing as to what is being said. For example a sentence that goes "Can I be forced to confess to that crime?" It's a difficult thing to both express and understand exactly in Japanese. For me anyway.
I love it!
German can be agglutinative, too. Perhaps not as much as Esperanto, or in the same way, but still...
My favorite long German word: "Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän." Means "Danube steamship company captain." My second favorite long German word: "Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänskajutenschlüssel." Means "Key to the Danube steamship company captain's cabin."
There was once, not so long ago, a language like Esperanto that was actually used and actually did what it was supposed to. It's called the Chinook Jargon, or Chinuk Wawa. It may not sound too pretty, but it developed naturally out of contact between Natives and European traders and was used as far up the West Coast as southern Alaska. There's even a tribe that still continues to use it (Grand Ronde in Oregon), who publishes a really info-packed text book in which you can learn all 500 of the language's root words.
Tl;dr, Chinook Jargon did it better just by being a naturally-developed contact language.
Interesting fact:
Since the time of Onisaburo Deguchi, the constructed language Esperanto has played a major role in the japanese Oomoto religion. Starting in 1924, the religion has published books and magazines in Esperanto and this continues today. It is said that they introduced Esperanto when they had contact with the Baháʼí Faith in 1921.
A famous practitioner of the Oomoto faith is Morihei Ueshiba, founder of the martial art Aikido.
fascinating, that's a religion I'd never heard of
@@andrewwitcombe-small3713 Same. Also; I expected Aikido to be much older (by, like, several centuries); but it’s actually about on par with Sambo, by the looks of it.
Aikido is as useless as Esperanto 😂
This video is a satire, but for those who took this seriously: Why criticize Esperanto for being Eurocentric and challenging for others, only to support English as the international language? Esperanto isn't perfect, and Europeans with Romance languages have an advantage, but it's still easier and quicker to learn. It seems like a nirvana fallacy-just because it's not perfect, doesn't make it the worst language in the world, and we can also improve it with time.
“It’s a language for everyone”.
No, it’s not
For people who speak Indo-European languages maybe
La lingua internazionale dovrebbe essere il napoletano
There are Japanese and Chinese esperanrists.
@@thexanada96 meglio il romano
@@amadeosendiulo2137 ofc the countries with 1 billion and 200 million people are going to have at least a few people who joined the esperanto cult, that proves nothing
Sentinelese would be a good choice as an international language
Beacause of you, i started learning esperanto🎉.
1:53 "It's eurocentric" Because only European countries speak those languages and not most of the world.
3:35 Go to the 1984 world and learn Newspeak.
4:52 I actually researched and turns out being fluent in Esperanto actually makes learning other languages easier.
5:15 Sure buddy.
5:50 Didn't you just clown on Esperanto for being eurocentric?
5:55 Not sure about the others but Ancient Greece invented Democracy.
6:11 Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo. Also, SCIENCE!
He is ignoramus.
If newspeak existed irl, people would still be able to think like people. Greek has different words for platonic love, sexual love, long-standing love, love for everyone, and love playful love, while English only has the word love. That doesn’t mean that English speakers don’t experience those kinds of love, it just means we use extra words to describe what kind of love it is. (Not to mention even successfully controlling a major language is impossible nowadays)
Perhaps at first Esperanto did fulfill the function for which it was created, but currently most speakers already know that Esperanto does not work as a lingua franca, I, for example, am learning it because it is an easy way to learn vocabulary and understand how many other languages work, I believe that the use of vocabulary from European languages (Spanish, English, French...), is due to the fact that European languages are the most widespread in the world, and in this way it is intended that is the easiest thing for most to learn.
PD: In Poland there is a town with native speakers, but it is not a big town
toki pona has native speaker too!
@@notwithouttext where?
@@Ivacraft to be fair it's only one, and they also speak english and arabic, and aren't fluent, but just look up "toki pona native speaker" with eriksealader, who taught his child toki pona (not the oziji ones because those are just skits),
Toki ponists thinking their language with 125 words is somehow usable to make actual sentences that can't be misinterpreted at all
@@kiwenmanisuno 137 words, and although you could misinterpret things easily it's easy to clarify and give context
Fun Fact: Esperanto is in Minecraft
so is toki pona
toki pona li toki pi musi Manka.
Esperanto must be learned after having learned all the languages of the world in order to reach 100%, in any other case, just speak Russian.
as a Russian, I see this as an absolute win
as a Russian language fan, I see this as an absolute win
Ас а Руссиан лангуаге фан, И сее тхис ас ан абсолуте вин
@@Slavasil This hurt to read
@@legacywolf443 it hurts to write too :(
I heard an interview with an expert on Second Language acquisition. She said the biggest predictor of success in learning a new language is an interest in the culture of that language. Esperanto has no culture, IMHO that is why it will never take off. English has both American and British culture for people to enjoy. The most commonly learned version of Arabic is Egyptian. Egypt has a huge film industry. etc, etc.
People should study the language of a culture that interests them.
Saluton kara, mi estas el Egiptujo kaj Esperanto estas sufiĉa bona kaj justa lingvo por ĉiuj. Mi povas kompreni la anglan sed mi ne ŝatas kaj kapablas paroli ĝin kiel Esperanto. La germana estis por mi falcila ol la angla. Ne ĉiuj homoj kapablas paroli la anglan bone kaj ne ĉiuj homoj povas atingi altan nivelon en la lingvoj kaj mi per Esperanto konaktis kun multaj homoj pli multe kompare dum mia lernado de aliaj lingvoj kaj Dankon. Kaj estas Ĉinaj Esperantistoj, kiuj bone scipovas la lingvon.
Saluton samideano 😜🖖
يا حبيبي، ان العربية حسنى من اي لغة. تستحق ان تكون اللغة العالمية.
@@erikdalna211 لغة جميلة صحيح ولكن عملية للاستخدام العالمي؟! ليس تماماً الاصوات ليست قياسية، القوانين ليست ثابتة، ونمط الكتابة مغاير تماماً للمعتاد في اغلب اللغات.... زِد على ذلك كونها وبصورة تقريبة لغة ذات طابع ديني على وجه العموم، يجب التفكير بموضوعية لمراعاة جميع جوانب اللغة المعتمدة من سهولة اللفظ إلى سهولة النحو والكتابة، الاسبرانتو حققت ذلك، الانجليزية لم تفعل ذلك من ناحية النطق والكتابة.
Mi ne nomus min samideano -- mi estas ja raŭmisto -- sed mi tute konsentas, ke Esperanto havas sian valoron kaj sian belecon, kaj Language Simp is just simply plain totally goddamn #$*! wrong with his misesperantism.
@@Asehpethank you for showing everyone how unhinged esperantists are.
There will never be a neutral language for everyone. Every language will be easier for native speakers of some languages compared to others. I think that Esperanto was a good try. I like Interlingua the most as a conlang, as it is unabashedly trying to focus on the Romance languages (with some English as a kind of tie-breaker), and also takes away the difficult grammar.
It was a good try, but still failed.
The thing is, most people don't want to learn any foreign language at all.
In my country, most don't even have an International passport to travel.
As for those, who care they aren't bothered so much with its difficulty. In fact a difficult language even has an advantage, because mastering it gives you an edge over the lazy crowd.
Also people don't necessarily learn languages to talk with all people around the world, but rather because some culture is "superior" in their opinion and gives them possibilities, so they want to be a member of the "club".
The problem with interlingua is that it is much harder to speak it fluently than Esperanto. I speak Esperanto fluently and Interlingua is easy to understand for speakers of Romance languages
@@alalexesc I would guess that you have not studied them equally. And of course for those who studied Interlingua, they may think that it's easier to speak fluently than Esperanto (unless you are pointing to some unmentioned feature of the language itself). And as you mentioned, for speakers of Romance languages, Interlingua should be extra simple to learn. So I'd say it depends. From the little that I know, both Interlingua and Esperanto seem to be quite simple to learn as languages go (simple grammar, regularity, etc).
@@KnightOfEternity13 "still failed"
Hard to succeed when Esperanto gets almost accepted as an international language at the league of Nation, but France and France only objects because they want to keep their monopoly as the language of diplomacy (which they lost to english), and then the nazis killed off many jews which Esperantists disproportionnately were, including Zamenhof's family.
Being the world leading language has little to do with being a good language and a lot to do with being the language of a world power. English for the western world, Russian for the east when the USSR was a thing. If the US and Europe were to lose a world war (which I definetly hope they won't, they're bad but the alternatives are so much worse) you'd have chinese becoming a world language. Esperanto was never going to become THE international language, but it definetly had a shot at being wildly more popular than it is but got blocked by fucking french and nazis.
Toki pona
I think the global lingua franca should be Hungarian. There's no bias here as it's impossible to learn for anyone trying to!
Pontosan, egyetértek veled.
A légpárnásom tele van angolnákkal.
The Duolingo lessons on Hungarian were the hardest. It begins with the hardest types of sentences. That made me give up on learning Hungarian.
@@30803080308030803081 Yes, Duolingo Hungarian is notoriously bad and is enough to put anybody off learning Hungarian.
Hungarian is so easy. Even a child can learn it. I learned Hungarian when I was a baby and now I speak it fluently.
@@randomhungarianperson Hmmmm.. something seems a little bit sus here. I could not pinpoint what exactly though
We have attained a point where openness and universalism is associated to identification to American culture. Not submitting to this, is thus viewed as narrow-minded or unhealthy nationalism or, in the attempts to reach other people not necessarily by submitting or assimilating to the Borg, as childish or stupid. And one symptom of this either gross chauvinist attitude (for Americans) or submissive attitude (for others) is Esperanto-bashing.
It feels arrogant to say, but I think it's pretty clear that English is the most "international" language we currently have. More people speak it as a second language than as a first.
It just further reinforces America's unearned cultural dominance and forces several thousands of millions of people to spend years learning an annoying and highly irregular language while the Americans literally don't have to lift a finger because they already speak it fluently.
Oh, hang on. You didn't say American. You said English. Actually, I take it back. Good choice.
@@omp199I'm pretty sure most people who are fluent in english as a second language(like me) acquired it just by being involved with the internet, without dedicated study. But I do get that depends on how much time you spend on the internet so, I guess
@@omp199"tell me your american without telling me your american"
"I know only one language"
Latin should be the international language. It was the original international language used by several monks and aristocrats for centuries, not to mention that since few people today know it, everyone has to take part in knowing it. Valete!👋
@@therealspeedwagon1451 Yeah equal in how unsuitable for everyone it is. Not sure if that's the kind of equality people want. This is like making a country wealth equal by exiling all the rich people so only the poor are left
Attic/Koine Greek is the only Lingua Franca there ever was, and ever needs to be. The simple act of learning Attic Greek automatically makes you a better than others. This is clearly the only option for a world language.
The only lingua franca is French silly
@@atkospr _shhh_ we don't want to dig that up
@@atkospr'Cause it has Frank in it.
« It’s written in the American alphabet » (referring to the Latin alphabet)
« We invented democracy » (δῆμος+ κράτος)
Ancient Greeks and Romans would be like: 🤨
🤓
🤣
The ancient Greek “Democracy” is not the kind of democracy that survives today. Their “democracy” was very different (for example, only the male warrior class had any real power) with our modern democracy having derived more directly from the Native Americans. See the Iroquois Confederacy and the “5 civilized tribes”
@@flightlesschicken7769 Yes, but still, you cannot say «we invented democracy» like that. I mean, it’s obviously wrong. Maybe « we contributed to its current state, but not «invented»
@@LeoBloom-kc4iv well, yeah. I wouldn’t say that Americans invented democracy. I also wouldn’t say the Greeks did under our modern definition of democracy either. But the word sure does trace its existence back to the ancient Greek and something sort of resembling our modern democracy was used by some ancient Greeks
What bugs me the most about Esperanto is the heavily Latin-based vocabulary. Not good for a true planetary, unbiased language... At this point, just sticking to Latin would have been the same option - And at least, we'd yet have had an established language to start with. Only credit I can give to Zamenhof and his language is that at least he can be considered the OG conlinguist.
You know nothing about Esperanto, so why do you speak about it? Your children will have to learn Chinese.
@@George-iv1hi Even Chinese don't speak Chinese. Our children are safe from it.
My vote is for Polish. Not because I'm a Polkaphile, but because it's got a lot of good things going for it linguistically and, unlike its Slavic siblings, it uses an alphabet a lot of the planet is already familiar with. Also, Poland will rise again and dominate the globe. We're already seeing signs of it become the next greatest economy in the Europe. It's either that or the Chinese will impose Mandarin on us all.
Polish has probably the most messed up Latin writing system
I vote for Polish too, despite I am Russian. You know the reason. Kurwa.
Most sane polskaphile
also: other Slavic languages that use the Latin alphabet while making it dyslexic-proof: *staring menacingly*
Kurwa ja pierdole... Though Polish has too much hissing sounds that's why I don't really like it that much
@@o_s-24 Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz moment. (It could be written easier if poles decided to make rz, sz, cz combinations as one letter but it was too much effort for them)
Petition for Language Simp to review Toki Pona 👇
wile tawa ni: jan Language Simp li lukin e toki pona 👇
pona a!
mi pilin e ni: „review” li sama ala e „lukin e”, li sama e „toki tawa”
Sonja Lang, the creator of Toki Pona, is an esperantist. There are Esperanto influences in her language.
o toki pona!
@@janPolijan a. mi sona e sina. sina pana e toki lon sitelen tawa mi
I believe the most ideal lingua franca would be Mongolian. It is just put simply, a gigachad language with cool history behind it and overall is pretty easy to learn. 😊
And you can throat sing in Mongolian too!
And it should be throat sung not spoken
But The official language in chad are french and Arabic
O
I'll save people's time by summarizing this video:
-He thinks few people speak it = useless
-It's Eurocentric (as if English isn't)
-Too hard to learn (This is how you know he's just making stuff up)
You must be new because a lot of what he says is NOT serious and obviously sarcastic.
_"Few people speak it = Useless."_ Obviously an exaggeration, but if you're gonna learn a language, might as well have it open the most doors for you. Which Esperanto kind of lacks.
_"It's Eurocentric (as if English isn't)"_ He literally acknowledges this. Try paying attention. 6:01 He jokes about how Esperanto is convoluted and Euro-centric like "American."
_"Too hard to learn."_ Again, maybe learn how to detect sarcasm. He calls "English" "American" like 100 times. Do you need him to make a disclaimer? Are you that senseless?
@@urphakeandgey6308
Just because he called English "American" a few times doesn't mean everything he said was all jokes and he actually loves Esperanto. I was fully aware he tried hard to be funny, it was kinda hard to watch actually. That's why I thought I'd save people some time by naming his main points.
"He literally acknowledges this" So ironic you had to bring up paying attention, because you missed the entire point of my comment. My comment says: "I'll save people's time by SUMMARIZING this video:", that means it's meant for people that would NOT have watched the video.
it is hard to learn and you’re coping so hard. fusha is easy to learn for all arabs too but nobody calls it an globally easy language for everyone
@satrancbuyukusta4751 Ah so something specifically for Arabs.. very relevant info, thanks.
Also thanks for letting me know a really easy language is hard for you. Not sure why you're telling me that, ig language learning isn't for everyone
@@Tunkert the point is that its easy for you because you already speak an european language. if you couldnt tell i am speaking english right now too which is an european language so it wouldnt be hard for me but its not globally easy. fusha wouldn’t be easy for me despite it being easy for the arab world because i don’t speak any dialect of arabic
Personally I think the Ulster dialect of Irish should be the world language
By that you mean the munster dialect
Complete video about Toki Pona and how it's absolutely giga chad of international languages while not even attempting being one as its first goal!!!!
most linguistically intelligent toki ponist (they think learnability is the only thing that matters)
@@kiwenmanisuno Least linguistically intelligent toki ponist (me) is taking linguistic courses in uni but good try!!!
Plus toki pona is also gigachad at mostly everything i'll proudly keep defending sonia lang supremacy
@@joaquinalvarez2784 When you go back to class, try imagining how hard it would be for your teacher to explain everything in Toki Pona. Or imagine if you were translating a law book into Toki Pona.....
@@chickenstrangler3826 Toki Pona accounts for that, it truly is easier and more understandable than it would be for a mandarin speaker to understand a law book translated into Esperanto
An international language has to be Eurocentric as European languages are already spoken all over the world, moreover practically every scientific words come from European languages. The world just don't need influences from Austronesian languages or Zulu dialects
Russian could easily be the international language because no other language has Ы and Ъ together
La kialo kial Putino kondutas tiel
Ыыыы
Runglish*
Эээяячччшшшжжжюююццц 😊
They don't go together though) And Korean has Ы as well, it is esven written somewhat similar 으 )))
Agglunative means you add or extend the root word with other things like prefixes, the root word is basically like a playdoh circke that you can use as a base for other things
Why noone likes esperanto rather
And I totally agree with Toki Pona as global language
Also a common European language could be reconstruction of Proto-indoeuropean
Toki Pona is too hard to say something a little more complex than something very basic, Proto-Indoeuropean is too hard to learn (and maybe not very well known (we don't know what H1, H2 and H3 are, I don't know how much we know about syntax but I think it's not very much))
Just use Latin again
@@FakePaleThe Germanic and Slavic people whose languages didn't evolve from Latin: 👁👄👁
@@heinrich.hitzinger +Baltic, Greek, Albanian, Celtic, Roma
@@heinrich.hitzinger Those still used Latin as the language of scholarship and diplomacy for most of their history
Really the only ones who would have valid reason to argue are the Greeks
I understand and respect your opinion, but I disagree when you said that Americans deserve to be their mother tongue as an international language. I took at least 4 years studying English to be able to have a conversation, and I'm still learning. I mean, I'm not even fluent... 75 days ago , I decided to learn Esperanto, and in terms of comparison, I would say that I've learned as much Esperanto as 1,5 years of English. I'm not an activist or Esperantisto as they call themselves, I wanted to learn it just for a hobby, and because I liked the way it sounds. I honestly don't believe it'll be the international language, but just in case I'll be ready 😂 on the other hand, the learning is being pleasurable and funny.
So you claim you could not learn to form plurals in English by adding '-(e)s', but able to do so in Esperanto with its '-[oa]jn?'. Somehow I doubt what you say is true.
Hungarian is the best language for global communication, extremely simple to learn , easy to pronounce, words and word order doesn't change.
It does seem easy to pronounce.
True. You can memoritse the agglutnations in your sleep and even when deceased
This video is imagining up a problem for a solution. Being cynical over an invention of a universal language and toiling over it's relative triumph over the mere _idea_ of "better ideas" is counterproductive. A fear of potential to the innocent and beneficial intent of an auxiliary language.
This man seeks perfection, and he will be waiting forever for the Perfect Culturally Agnostic Utopia language to catch on.
(He is also "defending" demographics that he isn't. Just sayin.)
Esperanto is not here to appropriate cultures. It's not a corporate entity or a religion or an ideology or propaganda. It's not fueled by greed. It's not controlled by anyone or any entity. It's not driven by anything except a well meaning cause and people who voluntarily want it. And it works for its purpose. Quite well.
Here's the reality: the idea of anything at all being absolutely unbiased is not possible. And language is culturally biased by nature of its purpose. The only way to invent a language indifferent to all cultures would be to make it unintuitive for everyone (scissors suck for lefties too!). You can't have an ambidextious language that people would adopt. A "diverse relation" is a paradoxical concept. And a utopic one when applied to society. Some give and take and sacrifice (the harmless kind) is necessary.
Furthermore, the idea of something catching on without an influence is...unlikely. And to attempt that is throwing a dart without even establishing a target. Even if someone invented this impossibly idyllic language that Simp seems to expect of us, it would lack an audience. We need a foundation. And then we need a population to care about it.
Keep in mind, the subject of language isn't pop culture *media.* It's just culture. It's not insidious. Or an imperial conquest. Or driven by want. It's cooperative and based on needs. Specifically, our need to find safe connections to one another. Oh, here's one: Esperanto?
To force and drown-out is discrimination. To moderate and offer is sharing. While officializing it into the system would be a serious decision, the United Nations and UNESCO recognize Esperanto as a medium for international understanding. I don't think the UN is racist. Or white.
It's amazing that we have a language at all that has a global presence and has been accepted as generally good enough to be universal by virtually every first world country. And @JakeHub_ stated below me, the Chinese logogram for Esperanto translates to "World Language." And Japan has an Esperanto Institute, as many countries do. I don't believe any Europeans marched in and "did" this to them. I don't think the enthusiasts in African countries are secret agents, either.
Yes, I'm suggesting colored people be allowed to use a beneficial idea without being proxy shamed by self-hating white guys. This isn't about stomping out or holding up traditions; it's about making and supporting something that works. The ingredients came from somewhere. Who cares where if the invention is beneficial and it _functions_ to this purpose well?
Everything is relative. That's why we _should_ judge on intent. Not history. Not "culture." Not what you assume is racist for demographics that aren't in the same room as you while you tell us what is good/bad for them.
There can't and will never be a universal language that is the same degree of effort for all cultures. Sorry. But this is a positive influence. And it is accessible.
Negative influence, as those who are interested in inaction over potential consequence, are an example of why Esperanto remains on the verge, despite it being--beyond reasonable doubt--a great idea. We could be teaching the next generation how to speak to everyone. But no. This one's too European.
Clearly, _The White Man's Burden: Part II._ Second opinion? Are there any Chinese, Congo, Australians, Jamaicans, or South Americans in the comments who feel as though Esperanto will eclipse their characters? Or are we all English speaking Americans stepping on our own toes? Carry on, I guess. But I can't help but notice the strongest opinions in the comments are just people...bullying Esperanto users, imagining they're all coffe sipping american hipsters? It's a global language. Not a fashion trend. Literally, what are you even talking about?
My suggestion? Get real.
Also, mind the strawman, but this UA-camr's channel is devoted to criticizing languages that he probably doesn't know, unless he disowns languages that he spends time learning. Which makes about as much sense as this video. Let's see him post a video where he speaks any language other than English before we listen to him critique them.
I was hardcore into learning esperanto until I remembered that languages evolve, and that if everyone spoke it, In a few hundred years some parts of the population will be unable to understand other parts and the purpose will be defeated.
The purpose was to implement a lingua franca for present time, I doubt that somebody would care for centuries ahead
No joke: American Sign Language is the best first second language. I’ve gotten more real world use from the little bit of ASL I learned back in the 80s than any other language. And like Mandarin, when you start doing sign language the locals start doing backflips in celebration. ❤ Upon finding out that I knew a little bit of ASL, I was offered a job ON THE SPOT at a place where I was temping. Insane!
But American deaf people are so political and weird about sign language.
@@30803080308030803081 How so? I am very curious about this!
It is undoubtedly the best first second language for someone living in the United States, alongside Spanish. It certainly is not going to be of much use outside the USA though of course, since it is distantly related to French Sign Language but not to anything else.
@@30803080308030803081 Hey, I don't know about the situation in there, but here in Brazil, LIBRAS (br sign language) had a very long and recent history of being legalized, few decades ago it was straight up prohibited (by the person in charge of the national deaf's school mind you) in favor of oralization. So you sort of need to get political about it, people being unaware of it's history caused many dehumanizing problems to them.
@@salvadorromero9712 the best second languages are your local sign language and you local lingua franca and/or second most spoken language, for exemple if you're from Brazil (like i am), the best languages to learn (for real world use) would be Libras, Spanish and English
As for Russian who was learning Esperanto, it is very easy to pronounce for me)
I know several Russians that speak Esperanto and some of the language was even based on Russian, so I was also shocked when he used that as an example.
Esperanto is a language Made in Russia 🇷🇺♥️
@@Zodamay but he was Polish and language is really based on Italian
@@konstantin_troitskiy Russia is a multicultural country to say that someone is not Russian because they are Chukchi or Kalmyk is silly.
Esperanto is not based on Italian, it has mainly Romance, Germanic and Slavic roots.
@@Zodamay For the majority of his life, LL Zamenhof lived in the cities of Bialystok and Warsaw, which were part of the Russian empire until his final years. Bialystok was a multiethnic city, with Poles, Germans, Russians, and Jews living in it. Despite this, Zamenhof noticed as a child that there were frequent conflicts between the different groups. He suspected that this was because they did not speak the same languages, and thus he was convinced that an international language would be an important step in achieving human peace.
Zamenhof himself had two native languages, learning Russian from his father and Yiddish from his mother. He was also fluent in Polish and German, and had studied other languages, such as French and English.
1:56 I laughed when I saw the flag of Mozambique used to represent Romance languages, but it turns out, their official language is Portuguese. The more you know. 🌠
Props to you for not switch baiting and actually saying you love Esperanto and its your mother tongue and the secret to eternal life. Respect!
Living in Denmark I speak Danish - but I don´t whine about the fact that I can only use it together with other Danish speaking people and that it´s not understood and spoken all over the world. It works for me together with other Danish speaking people. The same with Esperanto. It works together with those who speak too. Yes, it didn´t become the second language to the whole world. But that´s how ideas work. U.N. was probably meant to bring peace and understanding too to the world. It didn´t, but it´s still there.
The video destroyed my desire to learn Esperanto, but your comment brought me back up again. I was feeling guilty about learning a language I LIKE wth
Danish is a cool language, I study it in the US.❤
@@AdrianDuknes Never be afraid to learn something you genuinely enjoy or are passionate about. Honestly seeing this video and my defensive reaction to the frankly kind of silly attack on esperanto has motivated me to go through with learning Toki Pona. The language is just fascinating to me. Lojban is as well, but Toki Pona is considerably simpler so probably gonna start with that lol
5:53 But you have inferior potassium.
saying esperanto is rascist but in the same vid saying lets just have english as the international language is crazy work bro
I have a confession. I took Esperanto for a week😭😭😭
I prescribe you 2 weeks of proto-albanian as penance
I took it for a year, got bored, then I changed to Klingons. My roommate kept calling me a beta nerd and I wasn't sure why.
@@nokaton Based made-up language for war aliens vs cringe made-up spanish for dumbs
that's probably long enough to learn the language depending on how many hours a week you studied
@@professorarielne, semajno estas tre malmulte, sed monato estas suficxe, mi pensas
I think the international language should be Norwegian since it’s easy to learn and we all know it’s the best Scandinavian language and does not give you throat problems like danish and doesn’t have a weird word for window like Swedish plus it’s easy to learn since even children can speak it plus it’s just the best
I like that ‘weird word for window’ is your chosen critique of Swedish here lol
Fenster in German
Fönster in Swedish
"America invented democracy"
Greece:💀
I don't understand if it's mocking the argument against esperanto or it's really using the worst argument you can find
Mi ne povas kompreni ĉu li volas moki la argumentadoj kontraŭ esperanto aŭ li vere elektis la plej malbonajn oni povas trovi
1 Your reasons to hate it are bad. You hate Esperanto because its eurocentric however most people in the world already speak a European language mainly, English, Spanish, French, Afrikaans, Portuguese, Russian. It wouldn't be easy to make it have Arabic and Chinese roots since those languages require a completely different level of enunciation with their vowels and letters that if added to Esperanto would make it a lot harder for anyone to learn and even still, alot arabs already know French or English and alot of Chinese already know English
2 Too many words isn't a very good argument either because the more words the better for someone to completely explain what they are trying to communicate
3 it's not poisonous to the minds of the youth. It's better for them to try to learn a one world language than to learn Japanese because of anime
4 I don't like the name either. But you have worse names for languages
5 And lastly, even if English is pretty close to being the world language there are some major hurdles. Mainly French in North Africa, Spanish in Latin America and Russia in the post Soviet states. These are massive swaths of the world population who probably hate America for one reason or another and would be less inclined to learn English because of it. Esperanto would probably be more enticing for not only them but also other people all around the world.
For point five, Zamenhoff was a man who wanted to strip people of their non European heritage with his Euro centric language. Thus people will be less inclined to learn it.
1. Arabic and Chinese? Are those the only two non-European languages? The world is huge, Europe is minuscule. And while yes, much of the world speaks Indo-European languages a second language, it’s a much smaller percentage than you’d think. Most of them aren’t native-level either, conversational at best. The very thought that ‘everyone knows them anyway’ is pretty damn Eurocentric and racist. Not gonna lie.
5. Are we skipping over the implications of setting an obviously Latin language as a ‘world language’, something meant to symbolize world peace and unity? Yes, there may be countries that have anti-American or anti-British sentiments and yes, they might favor Esperanto. But you know what unites those countries and the rest of the non-Western world? AN ANTI-WESTERN SENTIMENT.
I assure you, try to make this shit a world language these days and you’re gonna start ww3. The anti-Western alliance will be sure to stomp down on it with the Eurocentrism argument, and you’re gonna need more than “it’s efficient” to convince them. West-aligned countries? Japan? Korea? India? The Philippines? Taiwan? They aren’t gonna be happy either. What about the United States itself? Too many roadblocks and potential enemies, and I think the Esperanto society is too naive about this. Maybe not the society, but individuals certainly are.
Hmm, in the beginning I thought I need to write a comment negating every point made, but as it gets more and more absurd, it's negating itself.
Unfortunately there will be people not catching the irony.
(One of these brainwashed people here. I even once sat in a room with the inventor of Toki Pona, and many years later helped to translate a song from Esperanto to Toki Pona, without having learned Toki Pona myself. I didn't know this channel before, but I guess UA-cam suggested this video to me because it has "Esperanto" in the title?)
At a company celebration for employees who had reached various milestones of employment (5 years, 10 years, etc.), I was asked to stand up and reveal an unknown fact about myself. I said that I was learning Esperanto.
There was a deathly silence. As all the other attendees stared at me like I was a freak.
Which I was. 😂
Jokes aside, Esperanto was very useful when I first became interested in learning Romance languages. It didn’t carry the trauma of my 7th grade Spanish class, or the cruelty I experienced at the hands of Very Evil French Instructors in college. I consider it the training wheels of language, and just like training wheels, should be discarded soon afterward.
And yeah, Esperanto was absolutely of NO USE whatsoever when I fell in love with Georgian, Russian, Ukrainian, Greek, and Norwegian. Won’t help with Bulgarian either. Boo.
No use when learning Russian? Speaking Esperanto you already knew about sia/lia, words like "kolbaso" "krom", etc.
@@Kanguruo French is what really helped me with Russian.
You learn Georgian? Wow, you have my utmost respect
I think it still helps to learn other languages, it helped me with Chinese and for starters the biggest help is to prove the students is not bad at languages, give them some self confident and a successful experience in learning the first foreign language. Also communicating with other speakers is a nice experience most of the times, it makes you want to learn more languages cause most of them are or get naturally into languages afterwards
@@Kanguruo it doesn't have even the most common Slavic features, such as aspects. Every Russian translator into Esperanto invents its own incompatible way to express even the basic Slavic thoughts.
Tbh I'm only learning Esperanto because basically, no one knows it, and I see my cousins once a year in the summertime, so when I see them next year the first day I arrive and see them I wanna confuse the hell out of them by speaking a language that kinda sounds/ has similar words then Spanish just to prank them.
It is not Spanish at all
@fitzburg63 I know but to me it kinda sounds like one of those romantic languages like Spanish
@@Toddthefrog07 Es[eranto is the isolating language, its vocabulary was initially based on latin and European languages, but its grammar is closer to Chinese, that is why the Chinese are so excellent Esperanto speakers. Now Esperanto has become fully natural language made by millions of Esperantists over 140 years of using the language in every walks of life. Esperanto progress is not fast, but steady.
@@fitzburg63 That's why it took me far, far longer to get used to saying "la libro" than it should have. The Spanish speaking portion of my brain would always scream at me in protest.
@@snowangelnc Same for me about your English.
00:35 KEVIN ??
RIGHT I FEEL LIKE I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO NOTICED
😭
i think esperanto can be good to learn because its based on a bunch of european languages so i think it would help you to learn other european languages
Kinda.
But I think you can as well just learn one of these romance languages with similar benefits.
For example, because I've learned French in university, I can grasp many similar ideas in Spanish.
If I'd learned Esperanto... wouldn't be so easy. It lacks for example complex verb system, traditional for Romance languages.
4:17 Бөек Татарстанны күрсәткән өчен рәхмәт!
Thanks for showing the greatest state of all - Tatarstan
4:24 I remember randomly learning about Esperanto online back in like the mid-2010s when I had just graduated high school. I was seriously considering devoting some time to learning the language but luckily realized how not easy it was going to be. I'm not even sure why I was interested in it back then. Maybe I drank the Kool-Aid and really thought it would be the universal language of the future one day. Seems like English is the almost universal language right now.
Welsh should be the international language because it's extremely easy and has funny sonorities
The fact that Esperanto is spoken so little is the reason why it makes such a great candidate for a form of cipher. Furthermore, the gazillion root words in it make it almost impossible to decipher.
Gazillion root words??? It has far fewer root words than English or other national/ethnic languages. Esperanto builds its vocabulary using suffixes and prefixes plus word compounding.
@@aviadiloStill, English gets a pass because most of the colonised world uses the language as a secondary or a tertiary. I have yet to meet a person who even knows that Esperanto exists.
@@hahahhahahahufool2114 I've met plenty of people who've heard of Esperanto.
@@aviadiloWith all due respect, you're just hanging around a different crowd. Only around 2 million people know Esperanto, which is under 0.1% of all humans.
Chinese and English are both in the billions, with Japanese and Spanish and other world languages reaching the 100 millions.
@@hahahhahahahufool2114 How many millions of people do you communicate with? I don't care if over one billion people speak Chinese. I have little to do with China apart from buying Chinese products. And if I need to contact people in China, there are plenty of Chinese Esperantists I can contact. I've been studying Italian the last five years, have done several intensive courses in Italy. Far more people speak Spanish, but I love Italy, visit often and so Italian is far more useful to me than Spanish or Chinese or Indonesian. In fact, Esperanto is far more useful to me than those three languages. The number of speakers is irrevelant.
Georgian should become international langauge
Based opinion
American Georgian or European Georgian? /s
@@СергейЛюбимов-у3ф European one
I have been to over 30 countries and I have never run into an Esperanto speaker. The old tv show Mission Impossible used to use signs in Esperanto if the scene was supposed to be in another country.
it's not like they all walk in the streets carrying a sign saying "I speak Esperanto"... well, sometimes they do 🤣
kiel esperanto-parolanto, mi plene konsentas kun la supre, esperanto devas esti detruita☝️
Jes.
mdr
esperanto havas stultan nomon kaj ĝi gejas
@@Deckbark Estas tre bone, ke Esperanto gejas.
Quale idisto ke me es, Esperanto eble devus destruesar
Personnaly I think québécois french should be the international language, its not widely spoken so almost every one would have to learn it and it sound good compare to american , but I think it would require a lot of efforts for people (even french) to learn the pronounciation and I'm probably biased by the fact that québécois french is my native language and I like it so much. Another problem would be the fact you can't write it, in school we learn to write a standard french because of that.
Z'êtes tous délu, le québécois c'est juste du français prononcé avec un accent bizzarre
No form of French sounds good compared to American. In fact, no form of French sounds good compared to _any_ language.
@@thethrashyone You're wrong.
2:40 The Chinese guy be learning Esperanto on Asian difficulty 💀
--there are 300 thousand esperanto speakers in china--
esperanto sounds like a new exotic coffee from starbucks
And your English sounds like a gorilla eating noodles
@@fitzburg63there's literally not a single grammatical error in his comment fym bruh
@@deanal-jackson4593But you are this gorilla using crazy language. You know nothing about Esperanto, so stop being funny.