Rare Images From Charles And Diana's Wedding Expose A Side The Royals Tried To Keep Quiet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
  • • Anne Chatting Royal - ...
    Rare Images From Charles And Diana's Wedding Expose A Side The Royals Tried To Keep Quiet
    Welcome to Anne Chatting Royal, your premier destination for captivating royal documentaries! In today's video, we explore the iconic wedding of Charles and Diana in 1981, famously known as the "wedding of the century." This historic event was watched by millions worldwide, making it one of the most-watched broadcasts in history, according to the BBC. However, behind the scenes, there was a significant amount of drama unfolding. Now, over 40 years later, as Charles prepares to take the throne as King, these rare images from the unforgettable wedding hold a new and profound meaning. Join us as we delve into the untold stories and significance behind these captivating images in our exclusive royal documentary. Stay tuned to Anne Chatting Royal for the latest updates and enthralling insights from the world of royalty in our royal documentary series
    ***
    By the way, disclaimer: As I said, all the information I give is my personal opinion. It may not represent the truth, although my experience believes it to be true.
    And about the copyright issue: Of course, I give my opinion, but there will also be similar opinions in the vast internet world out there, duplicate ideas are inevitable. I can ensure that I do not use those perspectives to animate my videos, and I ensure that my use complies with UA-cam and US fair use laws.
    If you have any questions, you can contact me via Gmail: annechattinroyal@gmail.com
    Love all, Anne.
    #annechattingroyal #royaldocumentary #diana #kingcharles

КОМЕНТАРІ • 215

  • @ShirleyMostert
    @ShirleyMostert Місяць тому +50

    Diana God bless her had her own set of personal problems even before being married. It is sad that it didn't work out but that marriage was never meant to be

  • @janmargaret7972
    @janmargaret7972 Місяць тому +78

    She was too good for him. He didn't deserve her.

    • @suziemartin3587
      @suziemartin3587 Місяць тому

      One day charlie will get his just deserts. He is a murder along with old horse jaw

    • @Lazydaisy646
      @Lazydaisy646 23 дні тому +5

      She was a bit of a nutter tbh. Read the biography about her by Andrew Morton which she collaborated with

    • @janmargaret7972
      @janmargaret7972 23 дні тому +8

      @@Lazydaisy646 I have read that book. I don’t think she was a bit of a nutter. I think he is the nutter, a selfish, spoiled, entitled nutter.
      She was very naive to have married him. I was pretty naive myself at nineteen/twenty.

    • @drummerlovesbookworm9738
      @drummerlovesbookworm9738 14 днів тому +5

      Her childhood was traumatic. She had abandonment issues. She already had an eating disorder. She was a mess, but so young her problems weren’t obvious yet because such young women aren’t assertive enough to make life as difficult as a more mature woman who have more life experience under their belt. She became a nightmare.

    • @mois9555
      @mois9555 7 днів тому +1

      He didn't love her, not the way she deserved. She had her agenda as did he. They both married for the wrong reason.

  • @melbabowen4389
    @melbabowen4389 14 днів тому +19

    From several pictures, It does show there was love between them for a while. So sad it didn’t last. 💔

  • @emilymvance
    @emilymvance Місяць тому +27

    Love the sapphire
    Diana forever

  • @rgomoffat
    @rgomoffat Місяць тому +56

    The Spencer line goes back further in history than the Windsors.

    • @gnostic268
      @gnostic268 21 день тому +2

      The Windsor name is relatively young but Charles and Diana are 16th cousins who descend through legal marriages and royal mistresses. The Spencers have also tacked their heritage onto the older Norman DeSpenser family (borrowed some aspects of the DeSpenser coat of arms) despite not being granted the right to use them.

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому

      ​@@gnostic268The Spencers were glorified sheep farmers. "Glorified" by female members of the family being Royal Mistresses of Charles II and giving birth to his bastards. Diana was descended from not one, but two illegitimate children of King Charles II of England: Henry Fitzroy and Charles Lennox, via two of her great-grandmothers, Adelaide Seymour and Rosalind Bingham.
      Queen Camilla shares this same lineage, for those who love to put Diana on a pedestal, while looking down their noses at Queen Camilla.

    • @bethweeks5943
      @bethweeks5943 6 днів тому +1

      @@gnostic268 Wow, that’s fascinating! Thank you🎉

    • @orcharddweller1109
      @orcharddweller1109 6 днів тому

      That is quite different from saying the Spencer lineage is longer than Prince Charles known lineage. Charles had the better pedigree.

  • @melgrant7404
    @melgrant7404 Місяць тому +54

    So many people say she cheated first but the only reason she had affairs was because she knew he was cheating first.

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 Місяць тому +3

      Not true. Source please - and *don't* say "the Crown"!

    • @melgrant7404
      @melgrant7404 Місяць тому +6

      @@keithgiblin2636 I don't watch the crown.its a bit like your comment. A work of fiction.

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 Місяць тому

      @@melgrant7404 So no real proof? That's what I thought...

    • @melgrant7404
      @melgrant7404 Місяць тому +4

      @@keithgiblin2636 what proof does anyone really have.we only have what the public have been told and what happened in her own words.

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 Місяць тому +1

      @@melgrant7404 Then take your own advice!

  • @laurabailey1054
    @laurabailey1054 Місяць тому +32

    Seriously you couldn’t get an AI to do the script properly? The language is mangled so badly.

  • @sarahholland2600
    @sarahholland2600 14 днів тому +13

    Catalogue ring?! Are you on glue? The ring was chosen by the couple together at the Royal's go to jeweller, Garrards of London. It had been featured once, in a 1 off advertising promo: a limited edition bound 'book' of their jewellery. That level of jewellers did NOT do catalogues & visits are by appointment only.. According to her Butler's book, Diana told friends she got overwhelmed when choosing, panicked & then just chose the one with the biggest centre stone: which Charles ok'd saying the blue Ceylon sapphire matched her eyes . It was estimated to have cost £35k & is worth £500k today.

    • @hilaryjohns4049
      @hilaryjohns4049 4 дні тому

      I never liked the ring and I stil don't. Not that my opinion is of any importance.

    • @sarahholland2600
      @sarahholland2600 4 дні тому +1

      @@hilaryjohns4049 It was very 80's. Flashy , big jewellery was very in then.

    • @hilaryjohns4049
      @hilaryjohns4049 4 дні тому

      @@sarahholland2600 I had a sapphire and diamond cluster in the 1960s, I still love it. The sapphire is in proportion to the diamonds.

    • @sarahholland2600
      @sarahholland2600 4 дні тому +1

      @@hilaryjohns4049 I've got a similar style dress ring that's amethyst & diamonds. But like yours the main stone isnt so flashy.

    • @hilaryjohns4049
      @hilaryjohns4049 3 дні тому

      @@sarahholland2600 Princess Catherine didn't have a choice. She couldn't choose her ring. Charlotte will probably inherit the ring, she might decide to have it made into a pendant. Of course it might go to a bride of one of her brothers.

  • @SeldimSeen1
    @SeldimSeen1 2 місяці тому +48

    Althorp House was at the time and is owned by the Spensers and has been for hundreds of years. They were not "renting" from the Queen.

    • @glen7318
      @glen7318 Місяць тому +9

      Johnny Spencer rented a house on the Sandringham estate from the queen

    • @lauraamundson769
      @lauraamundson769 6 днів тому

      Until Diana was a teenager, Diana's grandfather was living at Althorp, and Johnny was renting a house at Sandringham. The Fermoys has been the previous tenants.

  • @laurenferguson959
    @laurenferguson959 Місяць тому +28

    The AI voice sux. Prince Char-less? Prince Charles chose Westminster Abbey because of the acoustics, the choir, the space for a whole orchestra. Charles picked most of the music. Diana’s ring was not from a catalog, she chose from a selection of rings brought to the queen.

    • @laurabailey1054
      @laurabailey1054 Місяць тому +2

      Many others say it was from a catalog

    • @rgomoffat
      @rgomoffat Місяць тому +1

      It was not, it was inspired by a brooch Prince Albert gave to Princess Victoria, Gerrards of London created it for her.

    • @marciaoh7056
      @marciaoh7056 Місяць тому

      Diana said that she picked out her engagement ring.
      Charles has said he picked out the ring.
      Sources report the Queen picked it out from five options brought to her to choose from.
      Is it pure coincidence that Fergie's ring looked so identical??
      I believe the Queen picked it out. She's a control freak.
      That both Charles and Diana claim to have shopped for it is most likely a romantic tale they were encouraged to tell.

    • @gnostic268
      @gnostic268 21 день тому +8

      Westminster Abbbey? They were married at St Paul's Cathedral

    • @toniannsleddon4365
      @toniannsleddon4365 14 днів тому +2

      Can you seriously imagine her picking a ring from a ‘catalogue’ 😂😂
      Freemans, Argos? Dear god, what will they come up with next?!
      Hilarious!

  • @mariaw.4780
    @mariaw.4780 Місяць тому +15

    I didn't seen anything exposed or "kept quiet" that we haven't already known for decades. Clickbait.

  • @joanna5430
    @joanna5430 Місяць тому +23

    This is completely inaccurate, and made up. Lady Diana's engagement ring was crafted by Garrard, a London-based jewellery house which has maintained a close relationship with the British royal family since 1843, when Queen Victoria appointed Garrard as the Crown Jeweller

    • @im2cuteferu
      @im2cuteferu 3 дні тому

      Also Charles had a tray of rings for her to choose from. She laughed and said his eyes popped when she chose the largest one. 🤣

  • @ScorpioLurking
    @ScorpioLurking 14 днів тому +11

    FACT CHECK. Diana was never a teacher .
    She was a nursery assistant.

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn 13 днів тому

      I worked at a Day care center when I was 18 the supervisor called us teachers though we had no formal training

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому +1

      ​@@CarolShook-yg9nnThat was unconscionable.

    • @dalemoore8582
      @dalemoore8582 6 днів тому

      @@tessdurberville711why?

    • @bethweeks5943
      @bethweeks5943 6 днів тому

      @@CarolShook-yg9nn YES! Teacher Assistants also teach, care for, love and are loved!
      ❤🎉❤

    • @ScorpioLurking
      @ScorpioLurking 6 днів тому

      To be a teacher you needed in the past QTS, or now to do a PGCE after a degree.
      I taught Nursery Assistants and Teaching Assistants and the qualifications they gained did not allow them to be a teacher. I'm not disputing that they support children's learning and care about them but that technically they are not teachers.
      I have known private nurseries to refer to staff as teachers which may have impressed some parents but was not accurate.

  • @keithgiblin2636
    @keithgiblin2636 2 місяці тому +24

    Facts and pronunciation need checking.

  • @cathyshifley3472
    @cathyshifley3472 Місяць тому +58

    Honestly, the whole marriage was a huge sham! I don’t understand why Charles wasn’t honest & tell Diana the truth! I lost any respect I had for Charles when he set Diana up for a huge fall and, even worse, left her to deal with the fallout alone. What a coward!!

    • @janel342
      @janel342 16 днів тому +9

      Oh you people same old nonsense! He had to marry a virgin - not a lot of those around these days:
      He had to have healthy male heirs- all these are royal family rules.
      The Queen has to give permission when the heir to the throne marries -
      He obviously didn’t want to go through with it- but the Royal Line takes precedence over any personal needs.
      He has been so badly treated by people who don’t understand the constraints he was under.
      Look at the hundreds of young people he has helped with The Princes Trust.
      Wanting to be the Defender of FaithS says a lot about him.
      Small wonder he is ill- he’s had to shoulder so much from an ill informed public ready to take sides against a woman he has loved for over 30 years because of the attractive younger woman he was forced to marry to ensure a healthy succession.
      He had no legal obligation to accompany Diana’s coffin from France- but he went.
      He walked Megan up the aisle rather than her being alone.
      He is a decent sensitive caring man. I know him.
      And the misunderstanding he has had to put up with is very sad indeed.

    • @sarrhodes8277
      @sarrhodes8277 13 днів тому +4

      Were you young then? Were you even alive then? You may not be aware, but for years in the 1970s Charles and every girl he dated were hounded by the press. Hounded. He couldn't date ANYONE without the press of Fleet Street going after his new love and digging into whatever "past" she had. Girl after girl fell at this hurdle. They were swamped - and ex-boyfriends and/or lovers triumphantly exposed - quite often on a Sunday morning when the breakfast Sunday tabloids hit the mat. Front page - and often pages of it. Diana was that crock of gold at the end of the rainbow for them - a "virgin without a past". From the moment he met her the press went wild for her. The RF, especially, apparently, the Duke of Edinburgh - weary of the Groundhog-Day farce of his love life - pushed for a decision and more or less forced his hand. For her part no one in her family had the wisdom to advise the couple to slow down - give themselves time to decide if they really were a match. Instead it was full-steam-ahead and they were even hurried along. The outcome of course, everybody knows. Both of them were railroaded by their families to please a public who wanted marriage for Charles - and a virgin bride. An 18 month relationship - or even an engagement - could have disintegrated without a scandal had they only been allowed to test-drive it before they walked up the aisle.

    • @surlif
      @surlif 7 днів тому +2

      @@janel342 Queen Elizabeth ll father did not have healthy male heirs. There were no male heirs and it worked out great. Why did Charles have to follow rules that his mother's family did not have to follow? If he married the very young Diana and so much pressure was placed upon her, Charles should have taken better care of her instead of expecting her to all of a sudden be able to handle not being loved and also being the most famous woman in the world. That is all on Charles and he failed.

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 4 дні тому

      @@surlif You've been watching 'The Crown'!

  • @judymcdermott3466
    @judymcdermott3466 Місяць тому +11

    Diana arrived in the Glass Carriage. Owned by The Royal Family. She left with Charles in the Royal Carriage.

  • @fox39forever
    @fox39forever 19 днів тому +7

    It's amazing to see majority English people (and Welsh, Scottish, Irish) in these photographs. London is nothing like that now!!!

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn 13 днів тому

      It's like a rainbow 🌈 of people now quite lovely to see imo

  • @josephinewalker6181
    @josephinewalker6181 19 днів тому +9

    Prince Williams wife is not Kate Middleton but HRH The Princess of Wales. Correction please and apologies.

    • @hildeschmid8400
      @hildeschmid8400 9 днів тому +2

      I agree. They've been calling her Kate Middleton, and it makes me cringe, like fingernails across a chalkboard. As you said, she's Catherine, Princess of Wales.

  • @Aussie00
    @Aussie00 Місяць тому +15

    Dreadful video. Sooooo many mistakes!

    • @JoanMorrison-vq2jc
      @JoanMorrison-vq2jc 13 днів тому

      Diana was a mistake for Charles. I wish he would have dated her a lot longer so he could see she was very disturbed and Charles could have moved on. According to family and friends Diana wanted to be princess of Wales since her childhood. She wouldn't have looked twice at Charles If he was a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker! Disgraceful Diana! She took all her married boyfriends back to Kensington Palace and I feel bad for their innocent wives and children. Those wives should have gone on Oprah instead of Harry and Me-gain.

  • @rgomoffat
    @rgomoffat Місяць тому +5

    Her father was the 8th Earl of Spencer.

  • @joannathesinger770
    @joannathesinger770 2 місяці тому +35

    Damn AI voice!!!

  • @dulciemidwinter1925
    @dulciemidwinter1925 Місяць тому +10

    It's all come back to bite him now, though!

  • @sandram6828
    @sandram6828 Місяць тому +13

    I like them both but didn't think they were a good match due to the age difference. We all have different interests and at different ages.

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn Місяць тому +6

      I agree. The age difference was a problem maybe if she'd been a little older and more mature they could have found common ground

  • @thermisgoddessofjustice8032
    @thermisgoddessofjustice8032 10 днів тому +4

    They used her pedegree period,...Diana courageously made it a point to let the people of the country she had pledged her entire life &, her childrens lives to....., for justice to the monumental injustice she was facing.
    ..In typical historical British monarchial justice ..They just crowned the mistress instead.. , look at the catastrophic consequences on her heir and spare..25 years later by this action,.Unforgivable indeed

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому

      Pedigree. The Spencers were glorified sheep farmers. "Glorified" by female members of the family being Royal Mistresses of Charles II and giving birth to his bastards. Diana was descended from not one, but two illegitimate children of King Charles II of England: Henry Fitzroy and Charles Lennox, via two of her great-grandmothers, Adelaide Seymour and Rosalind Bingham.
      Queen Camilla shares this same lineage, for those who love to put Diana on a pedestal, while looking down their noses at Queen Camilla.
      Althorp was in the red when Prince Charles married dim Diana. Of course, her family kept her mental instability quiet.

  • @bdavenport9404
    @bdavenport9404 12 днів тому +2

    Diana did not do well in school. Her only reading was love novels and she thought Charles was the Prince from one of books. Charles was a mature intelligent man who was dedicated to his work. Read Lady Colin Campbell's book "The Real Diana". An honest look at Diana's life.

  • @beverleyreed4550
    @beverleyreed4550 21 день тому +3

    Charles and Diana werent leaving St Georges , they were married st Pauls as they could get 3 thousand guests in

  • @charlottelee3727
    @charlottelee3727 2 місяці тому +108

    It's sad how Charles was so gutless he proposed to a teenager who thought he loved her, when he knew all the time that he would rather sleep with his married mother mistress.

    • @shamimrashid9488
      @shamimrashid9488 2 місяці тому

      He fid that all tge time
      He was with camila the marrsige tecker night before his wedfing
      What a deceitfull human beeing
      All toyal fanily knew aboyt his continiuos relations with that ugly
      Old cart horse
      Thry used diana to produce heir to thrown
      Then killed her so he could marry and be come king
      God exists

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 2 місяці тому +9

      Aww, why so bitter??

    • @XevLexa
      @XevLexa Місяць тому +17

      @@keithgiblin2636Not bitter, just stating the facts!

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 Місяць тому +10

      @@XevLexa 'The Crown' is not "facts" js

    • @Fanackapan101-hh5el
      @Fanackapan101-hh5el Місяць тому +17

      Read the book Diana herself collaborated with about her childhood and marriage…..in which she outed her own father as one of the 2 most violent misogynistic bullies in British Aristocracy….Lady C , the author was married to the 2nd , a friend of the Earl ………So , in said book , when Lady C refused to write what SHE knew to be untruths about Charles ….Diana went to Andrew Morton to write “ Her True Story” ………
      I remember cruel headlines after their honeymoon saying she was a bit chubby and dressed like a granny …….Camilla was never a 3rd wheel in their marriage from day 1 like she said in that book ….Charles tried to make it work , Charlotte , he was separated from his true love by machinating grandmothers who wanted a Spencer girl …ANY Spencer girl for him !!! He was brought up by his grandmother and SHE influenced him and he was heartbroken, not weak willed and he knew his duty ……what would you do in his place ?
      I am sick and tired of the flak our King and Queen get from this and Duchess Disgusting is determined to bring all this out , so I dare you , Charlotte , read the book published almost 25 years ago and understand what made Diana grow into the woman that had 6 affairs , clearly desperate for love , damaged , manipulative, emotional and mentally challenged enough to leave the safety of the Ritz and shoot off at high speed NOT wearing a seatbelt!!!!!!!!
      The lost weight and the adoration from press and people went straight to her head ……don’t get me wrong here , her childhood must have been awful but knowing what we know now about childhood trauma and the adult psyche that follows that ……William and Catherine’s passion for mental health and early childhood development, SCREAMS to me that they have read that book and possibly even saw evidence from Lady C of Diana’s true involvement in it !?
      So has The King and Queen….they chose to protect Diana’s memory, they could easily have brought all this front and center to clear themselves etc but they didn’t , they took abuse after abuse , to maybe protect the boys as well ….whatever ……ENOUGH .

  • @roseannallan4944
    @roseannallan4944 Місяць тому +32

    Was horrified when I seen her dress it was horrible

    • @glen7318
      @glen7318 Місяць тому +1

      when you saw her dress?

    • @laurelschiller8753
      @laurelschiller8753 Місяць тому +5

      Her dress was AWFUL

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn Місяць тому

      I thought the dress about swallowed her it seemed a bit old fashioned for someone so young

    • @enjoyingmyvodka1013
      @enjoyingmyvodka1013 Місяць тому

      I didn’t like it either! It was a messy ball of fabric

    • @Trish-ql9kz
      @Trish-ql9kz 23 дні тому

      @@laurelschiller8753 looking at it now it’s awful but at the time most people agreed it was beautiful...

  • @sleepycalico
    @sleepycalico 6 днів тому

    That lovely feminine dress at the beginning is SO pretty.

  • @marymckay9426
    @marymckay9426 10 днів тому +5

    NO-ONE calls it ‘the commoners sapphire!’

  • @jamespembleton2666
    @jamespembleton2666 Місяць тому +4

    Ugh, is the audio AI? Pronunciations are a bit annoying.

  • @traceybarnes3040
    @traceybarnes3040 Місяць тому +8

    He was a week man .

    • @judithsands2737
      @judithsands2737 Місяць тому +5

      Could you possibly mean "weak"?

    • @OutWestRedDirt
      @OutWestRedDirt 14 днів тому +3

      Is
      Weak

    • @JoanMorrison-vq2jc
      @JoanMorrison-vq2jc 13 днів тому +2

      ​@@OutWestRedDirt Yes, you are right - now off you go - correct your own errors. LoL 🤣🤣🤣.

  • @helencowen135
    @helencowen135 18 днів тому +2

    None of the images in this are rare, they have all been in the public arena for decades. This is a fraudulent piece

  • @evaloop7992
    @evaloop7992 Місяць тому +9

    That wedding dress was hideous but she was a lovely bride!

    • @adelerodriguez2432
      @adelerodriguez2432 Місяць тому +3

      The bodice itself was simple. The sleeves were billows, and there was a lot of beading on the gown. Beautiful gown, but I actually liked Fergie's dress better.

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn 22 дні тому

      @@adelerodriguez2432 same here it was youthful and lovely

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn 22 дні тому +3

      I tried decide for years what it was about that dress I did not care for it..I think it's what you said big and billowy not at all flattering on the young bride

  • @vicvic098
    @vicvic098 7 днів тому +1

    My goodness, let the soul of Princess Diana rest in peace. What's dine cannot be undone. Please stop using her for your own gain.

  • @Kimberly-cx9uv
    @Kimberly-cx9uv 2 місяці тому +10

    Commoners sapphire? i think most jewelry of the royal family wasn't initially created for royals/aristocrats exclusively

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 2 місяці тому +4

      Was it a 'commoner's' price? Interesting omission...

  • @31Alden
    @31Alden 21 день тому +2

    The wedding dress was hideous.
    Hideous AI narration.

  • @sandram6828
    @sandram6828 Місяць тому +7

    King Charles is my 15th cousin 2 times removed and Princess Diana was my 12th cousin. i hope all goes well with King Charles's health.

  • @Kondasnaker
    @Kondasnaker 2 місяці тому +1

    ❤️✨

  • @lilgeorge34
    @lilgeorge34 8 днів тому +3

    Charles was in his thirties and knew it was time to settle down with a wife and make an heir and a spare. Camilla, the true love of his life, had married years before and had children by this point, so Charles could hardly ask her to marry him, he would have married Camila if he could have then.

    • @LindaGrey-wm9uc
      @LindaGrey-wm9uc 6 днів тому

      Camilla would never have passed the virginity test. Also their love child gave Charlie enough guilt to promise her the world. Also, the life of a breeding demure bride would have interfered with country house bedswap sport... the duties a bore..

    • @lilgeorge34
      @lilgeorge34 6 днів тому

      @@LindaGrey-wm9uc What love child ???

  • @lynnhexler-haan3357
    @lynnhexler-haan3357 22 дні тому +1

    Diana's father was bitter & angry at his divorce, in taking custody of the children, he did so out of spite. Sadly, he threw a spanner in the works with visitation & the time spent with their mother.The man was an ogre if the truth be told.
    😮

  • @purpleviolet2058
    @purpleviolet2058 Місяць тому +1

    💜

  • @CarolShook-yg9nn
    @CarolShook-yg9nn Місяць тому +6

    Charles did not lie to Diana. She knew he didn't love her. He cared about her and she loved him. She had hoped to one day be the Queen of England but that was not to be

    • @CarolShook-yg9nn
      @CarolShook-yg9nn 13 днів тому +1

      @JoanMorrison-vq2jc I've been saying for the longest that they both had similar aspirations. They really did try to make it work despite their differences

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому +1

      Diana married the title, not the man.

  • @elbaestridge6503
    @elbaestridge6503 7 днів тому +1

    Her name is HRH Catherine, Princess of Wales.

  • @jamesmichaelshawnburgholze2536
    @jamesmichaelshawnburgholze2536 2 місяці тому +4

    That was leaving St. George not arriving. Charles was with her, and it is in the royal carriage. Diana did not arrive in the horse drawn royal carriage.

  • @allan.johnson.
    @allan.johnson. 26 днів тому +2

    Enough let her rest in peace this is just Gossip crap I hate people try to make something out of nothing this video is rediculous.

  • @kerrykuhn8838
    @kerrykuhn8838 2 місяці тому +27

    Diana has passed away and the rest is history. Don't think her or charles should have to hear these stories anymore. Move on . My opinion only.

    • @melgrant7404
      @melgrant7404 Місяць тому +3

      Hang on Charles caused the stories of Diana. Apart from that Diana played an important part of royal history and therfore should be remembered.

    • @laurabailey1054
      @laurabailey1054 Місяць тому +3

      @@melgrant7404 no he didn’t. She cheated first and that has been proven many times

    • @melgrant7404
      @melgrant7404 Місяць тому +3

      @@laurabailey1054 only after he cheated first.

    • @TatyanaSoebianto
      @TatyanaSoebianto Місяць тому +1

      Agree

    • @OutWestRedDirt
      @OutWestRedDirt 14 днів тому +2

      ​@laurabailey1054 liar. She only turned to another after it was clear Charles refused to be a husband, refused to keep his vows.

  • @tarawhite4419
    @tarawhite4419 Місяць тому +9

    My God people REALLY need to move on

    • @keetahbrough
      @keetahbrough Місяць тому +4

      no, we don't. to king charlie? no, thank you. xo

    • @melgrant7404
      @melgrant7404 Місяць тому +4

      She was a very important part of royal history so she's not to be forgotten.

    • @hildeschmid8400
      @hildeschmid8400 9 днів тому +1

      ​@@melgrant7404yes.

  • @katherinelehmann9590
    @katherinelehmann9590 Місяць тому +4

    Some of the pronunciations are off. Nuptials should be pronounced: “Nup-shoe-als.”

  • @JulieSkinner777
    @JulieSkinner777 Місяць тому +2

    This AI narration is so horrible. So many mispronunciations!!

  • @audspod1
    @audspod1 2 місяці тому +6

    Still waiting for a side the Royals tried to keep quiet!! Nothing new here!

    • @hoboonwheels9289
      @hoboonwheels9289 Місяць тому +1

      Extra dress, bouquet perhaps? Not too many brides afford more than one, just in case.

  • @michelled5037
    @michelled5037 4 дні тому +1

    Whats that noise at 1:47?? 😮😅

  • @adrianblackberry9327
    @adrianblackberry9327 7 днів тому

    One mistake. They did not forget to kiss at the alter. They were not obliged to kiss. Look at the other Church of England Royal Weddings

  • @LeighBittle-dt6zh
    @LeighBittle-dt6zh 24 дні тому +1

    Just look at that photo. All the time charles was acting. Thinking about camillia

  • @sandraloubser4358
    @sandraloubser4358 8 днів тому

    How can you marry someone you have only seen 13 times.?

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому

      Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz met George III on the day of their wedding. They married six hours later. They were married for 57 years, in sickness and in health. 15 children.

  • @ilsesmith9493
    @ilsesmith9493 13 днів тому +2

    Another channel to block.

  • @glen7318
    @glen7318 22 дні тому +2

    you obviously know nothing.

  • @gardenroom65
    @gardenroom65 23 дні тому +2

    Charles was a deadbeat father and husband…..

    • @JoanMorrison-vq2jc
      @JoanMorrison-vq2jc 13 днів тому

      Compared to Diana Charles was a sweet heart 💖 as a spouse and parent!

  • @teresaareces4995
    @teresaareces4995 Місяць тому +5

    This is so un important

  • @lindafarnham8994
    @lindafarnham8994 20 днів тому +3

    I wonder: is Harry even Charles’s? With that red hair he could easily be Hewett’s.

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому

      Or 100% Spencer.🤔 Did you think the Lannisters invented it?

  • @LisaFerguson-lw8il
    @LisaFerguson-lw8il 26 днів тому +1

    Diana's engagement ring was designed by Charles.
    Diana had a 2nd dress, which she wore after lunch & photographs. That is standard here. The gowns worn for the church are not suitable for dancing and moving freely.

  • @user-gr7nx1lr8t
    @user-gr7nx1lr8t 22 дні тому

    He didn't love as we know she was19 same age as me he was 32 far to old .they wanted a hier ever bothered with the royals since then treated badly

    • @michelledelfrate1014
      @michelledelfrate1014 8 днів тому

      Actually she was 20 when she married. It is often mistakenly reported that she is 19 to try to increase the age difference and add drama!

  • @ardiffley-zipkin9539
    @ardiffley-zipkin9539 10 днів тому

    Geta better AI application and program it to pronounce key words properly.

  • @Canerican.
    @Canerican. 9 днів тому +2

    Move on!

  • @emilymvance
    @emilymvance Місяць тому +10

    Charles is to blame for the whole crapshoot

    • @tessdurberville711
      @tessdurberville711 8 днів тому

      No,that would be Mr. Shand, Mr. Parker-Bowles, the Queen Mother, Baroness Fermoy, and John Spencer.

  • @susanbhatt3128
    @susanbhatt3128 11 днів тому +1

    Hear hear, lousy AI

  • @Jeanne.Carver
    @Jeanne.Carver 24 дні тому

    Your facts are not correct!

  • @jmfs8738
    @jmfs8738 8 днів тому +1

    Junk narration. The reader/AI cannot pronounce the most basic words. Ridiculous! Ie: Nup ti Als

  • @walkzfar
    @walkzfar 25 днів тому

    I wonder where God put Diana... Matthew 8 12 or Hell...

  • @bobmarshall3700
    @bobmarshall3700 Місяць тому +3

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzz..............

  • @arleneculshaw8462
    @arleneculshaw8462 Місяць тому +4

    I agree he is completely gutless and just wants himself and William on the front row. Can’t stand them. Just send my love to Harry and Megan xxxxxx