Watchmaking Secret Audemars Piguet Doesn’t Want the Public to Know

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • So of course you’ll have guessed by now that the fourth most popular brand and the subject of this week’s In Focus series is luxury giant Audemars Piguet. For better or worse, Audemars Piguet is predominantly responsible for the luxury watch landscape as it stands today, the paradigm-shifting 1972 Royal Oak starting a chain reaction that recovered the entire industry from obsolescence. Follow along as we delve into some of the unknown parts of Audemars Piguet’s stories, both here and in the articles we’re posting over at watchfinder.com. You can catch us over on Instagram too. Links in the description. So, Audemars Piguet-you probably know a lot about it already, but here’s some stuff you didn’t.
    Featured Watches:
    Audemars Piguet [Re]Master01 26595SR.OO.A032VE.01
    Audemars Piguet Jules Audemars Dual Time 26380OR.OO.D088CR.01
    Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 15210BC.OO.A002CR.01
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Double Balance Wheel Openworked 15407ST.OO.1220ST.01
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400ST.OO.1220ST.03
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Tourbillon Extra Thin 26510ST.OO.1220ST.01
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Leo Messi 26325TS.OO.D005CR.01
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar 26574OR.OO.1220OR.01
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Tourbillon Chronograph 25977ST.OO.D002CR.01
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15300ST.OO.1220ST.02
    Shop now for Audemars Piguet watches:
    www.watchfinde...
    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watc...
    Watchfinder is the number one place to buy, sell and exchange premium pre-owned timepieces. Discover more exceptional watches at www.watchfinde...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 268

  • @watchfinder
    @watchfinder  Рік тому

    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

  • @slick4401
    @slick4401 2 роки тому +98

    My opinion is that the Royal Oak did revived sales of luxury watches for luxury's sake, and at a crucial moment. But what actually saved the (luxury) mechanical watch industry was the progressive vulgarization of quartz movements and the relentless decrease in value of the technology as the 70s progressed. At some point it became so cheap that the technology simply had no place in luxury watches, and so it was back to micromechanics and beauty, and so mechanical watches reemerged.

    • @hibakihiey6055
      @hibakihiey6055 2 роки тому +3

      royal oak designs sucks alot

    • @coffeeisgood102
      @coffeeisgood102 2 роки тому +4

      I have to agree on the premise. It just didn’t make any sense to me that craftsmen (and women) would put so much time and work into creating a beautiful case, dial and hands, and then pop a cheap quartz movement into it. That would be like taking the engine out of a Ford Pinto and installing it under the hood of a Rolls Royce Phantom.

    • @jimmyjay122
      @jimmyjay122 2 роки тому +15

      @@hibakihiey6055 you’d need to experience it in real life to understand. But it’s OK if even then you didn’t. It was never meant to be for everyone…

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 Рік тому

      Yeah, when a two dollar SOKU Chinese quartz watch is more accurate than the most expensive Rolex...........

  • @oxysoxos
    @oxysoxos 2 роки тому +28

    All those people who think that AP is a one trick pony and lacks depth. Just look at their whole catalogue of watches. They do it all.
    The Royal Oak is just by far their most popular one. Even if you limit your view to the Royal Oak, it is actually so diverse in terms of size, designs, materials and complications.
    So, AP really is a complete watch manufacturer. You just have be confident und informed enough to look beyond the most popular options.

    • @misteratoz
      @misteratoz 2 роки тому +4

      The Jules Audemars pieces are gorgeous as are the the code 11:59 (some of them)

    • @user-rx9ny4yo2e
      @user-rx9ny4yo2e 2 роки тому

      I'm no longer abble to find the jules audemars colection on their website. Was it discontinued?

  • @rodrigogutierrezreyes4702
    @rodrigogutierrezreyes4702 2 роки тому +6

    Although I do not like the looks of the Royal Oak, I have to say that it not just revived the luxury watch sales, it could be argued that it revived the watch as a whole. It made mechanical watches appealing again. And thus, I think it helped the industry as a whole, not just the swiss

  • @fenepi
    @fenepi 2 роки тому +10

    Looking forward to the Omega videos next week, Patek the week after, and then Rolex to wrap things up.

  • @bozartg
    @bozartg 2 роки тому +2

    Love the background you give that many of us have no idea of how something came about. I appreciate the history and work that goes into these.

  • @davidb5720
    @davidb5720 2 роки тому +34

    I love the Royal Oak and would love to have one but I do think that JLC deserve more to be in the “holy trinity” than AP

    • @BobbyDazzler888
      @BobbyDazzler888 2 роки тому

      Heritage

    • @Kr0nicridah
      @Kr0nicridah 2 роки тому +1

      I own watches from both brands and there is no comparison. The quality that AP offers is head and shoulders above JLC’s

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Рік тому

      JLC deserve their own pedestal above ALL the other brands for their contributions to watchmaking.

    • @InTimeMiami
      @InTimeMiami 11 місяців тому

      ⁠@@Kr0nicridahyou don’t know what you’re talking about. AP literally uses JLC movements, and has been for years now. They use a base JLC movement and slightly modify and decorate it.
      To say there is no comparison shows how little you know about both brands. I’ve worked on both and JLC far surpasses AP when it comes to movements. Only thing AP has on JLC is the RO design, and they didn’t even design it themselves. Genta did. The build quality isn’t the best either. Water resistance is almost next to none. Butterfly Clasp is always having the screws come off after a year or two. Seen it far too many times. AP movements are always crapping out after two or three years, even though they are JLC movements, AP doesn’t do the best job apparently because the JLC iteration of the same movement will last 5+ years.
      So, I explained my reasons why JLC is better than AP. not leagues better, but better. Can you tell me your reasoning for saying there’s no comparison? I would really like to know why you think that.

    • @InTimeMiami
      @InTimeMiami 11 місяців тому

      @@jamesrobert4106exactly. I don’t understand how someone can say ap is so much better than JLC. Jlc makes legendary movements. Jlc’s ultra thin works so good that ap AND Patek use them in their watches. That says a lot. I can’t even name one ap movement that was 100% built by them. They almost exclusively use other manfs movements.

  • @jrwong23
    @jrwong23 2 роки тому +3

    Love the history behind the RO presented here! Keep it up! If you have time, please do a similar type of video on Piaget, a maison I recently got to fall in love with.

  • @khurramsoomro1079
    @khurramsoomro1079 2 роки тому +1

    This is the best UA-cam channel about watches. Bravo!

  • @dadisurfer
    @dadisurfer 2 роки тому +7

    Great review, thanks. The Royal Oak is no doubt a masterpiece of design. My preference goes to the 37mm 15450 in steel and blue dial. Please review the L.U Chopard Chrono One Flyback 42mm in SS and Titalyt

  • @chubbymonkey6604
    @chubbymonkey6604 2 роки тому +14

    What is Simon without Garfunkel? Wildly successful

    • @plantex625
      @plantex625 2 роки тому

      Yeah this. I love S&G but Graceland is one of the best albums of all time

  • @jimmyjones9780
    @jimmyjones9780 2 роки тому +3

    After nearly six years of continuous use, I am still very proud to own and wear my AP, RO, OS, QEII Cup, Hong Kong 2016, Limited Edition in Pink Gold and Forged Carbon ....

  • @freddelarsson4434
    @freddelarsson4434 2 роки тому

    Subbed for probably 3 years now to this channel, the quality of these videos never get's old.

  • @DouglasRosser
    @DouglasRosser 2 роки тому +67

    You guys should get a stipend from all the high horology makers. Who else is seeding the fields for the next generation of big spenders?

    • @VGMO17
      @VGMO17 2 роки тому +12

      I was born in the digital age. I would't know this brands if it weren't because of channels like this. By the time an AP gets mass media exposure, it's already been covered in diamonds by a rapper and lost all of it's original appeal

    • @timewave02012
      @timewave02012 2 роки тому +11

      Watchfinder is a subsidiary of Richemont who also own ALS, JLC, VC, Cartier, and a bunch of other major brands.

    • @sgddfgfghfgh
      @sgddfgfghfgh 2 роки тому +5

      @@VGMO17 if you wouldn't know these brands without these videos let's face it kid, you're never going to afford these and your social circles, if they haven't exposed you to these brands, suggests you'll never afford one

    • @xMamoo2011
      @xMamoo2011 2 роки тому +20

      @@sgddfgfghfgh jesus the pretentiousness

    • @sgddfgfghfgh
      @sgddfgfghfgh 2 роки тому +4

      @@xMamoo2011 jesus, the poverty

  • @aliparvizi4490
    @aliparvizi4490 2 роки тому +5

    more content on grand seiko and king seiko would be great !

    • @cd1934
      @cd1934 2 роки тому

      Grand Seiko =100%

  • @ingra888
    @ingra888 2 роки тому +2

    That was a great break down of a watch history that saved a company circa 1970s to present!
    Just 5000 watches AP manufactured in total in a year, in the 70s that sounds disastrous.
    But look at them now part of the big three trinity watches!

    • @msbrownbeast
      @msbrownbeast 2 роки тому +1

      AP was always part of the big three holy trinity, even before the 1970s

  • @MrVoayer
    @MrVoayer 2 роки тому +4

    Coffee table piece of history ! Intriguing and amusing every time it is told ! Nowadays we take things for granted. Only few are aware of how ominous some past years were and how crucial some desperate decisions proved to be ! Today Royal Oak has such a prestigious status that it is even harder piece to buy straight from the street, than Rolex's Submariner, or GMT II or Daytona !

  • @vadimdon
    @vadimdon 2 роки тому +3

    Amazing video yet again. Could you please do a review of Chopard Alpine eagle 41 and maybe featuring the Ap royal oak and/or Vacheron constantin overseas 🤩

  • @nakibsayyed4999
    @nakibsayyed4999 2 роки тому +11

    Audemar Piguet Royal Oak is one of my all time favourite, glad to hear the history and significance it has in the watch industry.

  • @bartglover22
    @bartglover22 2 роки тому +1

    Not just my opinion ask any student of design Gerald Genta’s Royal Oak is a classic. It’s a sports watch, all shinny & brash with an industrial marine theme. At this stage it’s an icon and I’d love to own one but at 71 years old my priorities lie elsewhere but don’t think for one minute I haven’t thought of pulling a fast one and announcing we will be going back camping for the next couple of years probably in the back garden. Watch collecting is a curse.

  • @watchreviews4k
    @watchreviews4k 2 роки тому +1

    Interesting review. Enjoyed it. Keep up the good work on your channel. Regards, #WR4K

  • @vanillacoffee
    @vanillacoffee 2 роки тому +1

    Your chat with Scottish Watches was excellent. Cheers.

  • @j.pendergrass9805
    @j.pendergrass9805 2 роки тому +1

    You where the first channel I subscribed to because of how you mentioned your appreciation of subscribers and Not nagging them. Please keep that classy-ness.

  • @quinnsearle9977
    @quinnsearle9977 2 роки тому +1

    You're the best there is... but that Simon without Garfunkel line? Paul Simon's solo career is undoubtedly his best work

  • @saymyname218
    @saymyname218 2 роки тому +5

    I respect the Royal Oak but i've never really liked the look of them.

  • @nrmanzanares
    @nrmanzanares 2 роки тому

    Very good information and production, really the best Thank too!

  • @mtbnl39
    @mtbnl39 2 роки тому +4

    Fun fact that everyone ignores with the AP Royal Oak: It's not a sports watch and you can't go swimming with it. It has a mere 50 meters of waterresistance.
    Go figure.

    • @Kr0nicridah
      @Kr0nicridah 2 роки тому

      Just because it has a 50m water resistance with it doesn’t mean it’s not a sports watch. As the narrator implies, the Royal Oak is more about style over function. But I do swim with my AP’s.

    • @ZephDweri
      @ZephDweri 2 роки тому

      I always wanted a Royal Oak, but the 50m waterresistance and the fragile bracelet and scratch magnet is a no for my lifestyle. I got the Rolex GMT with the oyster instead

  • @rhodes1591
    @rhodes1591 2 роки тому +2

    Interesting. But we got used to that.
    We are a little spoiled here.
    Thank you, for that.
    🙏🏻

  • @rayleeaustralia
    @rayleeaustralia 2 роки тому

    Mr Talking Hands. Would be great if you may do a story on Piaget. I remember back in the seventies they were part of the big four.

  • @fphuebscher
    @fphuebscher 2 роки тому +4

    Keep on teaching us, you do it well...

  • @SirWilliamTambourine
    @SirWilliamTambourine 2 роки тому +21

    The Royal Oak looks like a tiny manhole

    • @dadisurfer
      @dadisurfer 2 роки тому +3

      😂 funny perspective

    • @jabezh
      @jabezh 2 роки тому +1

      You should look up where Genta got his inspiration from. I think it was from a manhole or porthole

    • @SirWilliamTambourine
      @SirWilliamTambourine 2 роки тому

      @@jabezh What??? Are you serious??? Thank you man I had no idea i will check it out

    • @leftsidem5030
      @leftsidem5030 2 роки тому

      Pervert 😂😂

    • @SirWilliamTambourine
      @SirWilliamTambourine 2 роки тому +2

      @@leftsidem5030 that's not what a manhole is

  • @u.d.7543
    @u.d.7543 2 роки тому +13

    I enjoyed the video, but I don't like royal oak. The design is not appealing to my eyes and I don't like the brand either.

  • @michaelg8258
    @michaelg8258 2 роки тому

    Great video. Informative, and even suspensful. Movie-length version on the historical arc of watch technology, please. I'm thinking Netflix documentary.

  • @chrisjones6439
    @chrisjones6439 2 роки тому

    Still the best channel on UA-cam.
    BTW Andrew, loved you on the SW podcast 👍

  • @BrittPearceWatches
    @BrittPearceWatches 2 роки тому +1

    How gorgeous is the Royal Oak?! Man! If I could ever add one of these to my collection. 💀❤️

  • @spankyharland9845
    @spankyharland9845 Рік тому +1

    I do believe these beautiful high end watches will put themselves out of business if they continue to charge super high prices that will make it impossible for regular folks to buy- plus they are making many quartz watches that are just as beautiful and more affordable to the working man and woman. You will still get hardcore collectors, but who is going to fork over that type of money for a watch when inflation is currently so high.

    • @stevelufc64
      @stevelufc64 11 місяців тому +1

      It's human nature to want things that are out of reach and to show off to those who can't have what you have

  • @styx4947
    @styx4947 2 роки тому

    Love the series on deep dives. Good shit

  • @andreizamfira
    @andreizamfira 2 роки тому +6

    I never understood why this brand is prestigious, and moreover, on the second place after PP... In my opinion they only knew to build 'gamble' prices...

  • @arpitashejwalkar2541
    @arpitashejwalkar2541 2 роки тому

    Congratulations for 700k subs

  • @smart4141
    @smart4141 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the detailed story of AP

  • @JamesAlexander14
    @JamesAlexander14 2 роки тому

    Great informative video. Many thanks.

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 2 роки тому +11

    GG's 70s designs are very much the "Emperor's new clothes" imho, really I don't get the hype, just fugly.
    Good video tho, Cheers 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @jacobcoddington9013
    @jacobcoddington9013 2 роки тому

    Amazing eye opener! Thanks!

  • @benjymerida2028
    @benjymerida2028 2 роки тому +1

    thank you for these Wonderful videos :)

  • @mattys1467
    @mattys1467 2 роки тому

    Great history of an iconic watch. Thank you

  • @jensh.2595
    @jensh.2595 2 роки тому +9

    First of all, AP didnt have the tech required to make the RO. As a japanese watch collector Im free enough to say, wow that tells a lot about the old AP at best. Secondly, I can't understand how those loving the design can accept any of the modern versions that changed the size. Honestly the 41 is a blocky, chubby and overpriced watch for the most part. A homage to itself. 15202 only. And even then, is a lucky design shot worth to pay such insane sums for? I breath watches but damn, either buy a lot of cheaper ones for that money or go enjoy yourself otherwise. You are either to rich to wear that thing or too broke to actually spend the money for that. Buy a car just to trash it offroad, buy a Hublot and shoot it with a 50cal, h***ers, idk man. There is always a better alternative.

    • @garyboyle695
      @garyboyle695 2 роки тому

      They did have the tech to make it, just not in steel as they didn't make many steel watches if any. It says so in the video but then why let the truth get in the way of your rant.

  • @GabrielX84
    @GabrielX84 2 роки тому

    Love the video and I have totally fallen hard for the Royal Oak. What a great story!

  • @tomasztyszkiewicz6451
    @tomasztyszkiewicz6451 2 роки тому

    Keep up the good work. Love your vids.

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 2 роки тому

    Entertaining and informative, thank you Mr. Talking Hands (can we say your name now?)

  • @Han-Sensei
    @Han-Sensei 2 роки тому

    Hey, why dont you do a review on Memorigin watches?, i believe they have the most spectacular design for their price

  • @vladadesigns8476
    @vladadesigns8476 Рік тому

    Royal Oak - Fukin' prettiest wrist watch in the world ever, ever made.

  • @mahmudulislamkhan
    @mahmudulislamkhan 2 роки тому

    Always fun to see the legend.... soothing to the eye

  • @andrewlawson3694
    @andrewlawson3694 2 роки тому +1

    Gonna be a great series I'm hooked articles as well. thanks for taking the time. regards Andrew

  • @dickydarmali7861
    @dickydarmali7861 2 роки тому

    Love the AP RO. Luckily, bought it before the price boom

  • @alphacause
    @alphacause 2 роки тому +16

    Audemar Piguet is a one trick pony. With that said, the one trick they have pulled off - making the octagonal and industrial design aesthetic a highly sought after piece of expensive horology - is outstanding. The testosterone inspired shape infused the luxury watch market with some much needed machismo.

    • @bs12984
      @bs12984 2 роки тому

      well it doesnt cost to comment

    • @bs12984
      @bs12984 2 роки тому +2

      if anyone is a one trick pony it is rolex. all the watches look almost the same with the same strap too.

    • @alphacause
      @alphacause 2 роки тому +4

      @@bs12984 You will get no argument from me. I detest Rolex's popularity. In a world that truly valued craftsmanship over hype, brands like Grand Seiko, Vacheron Constantin and definitely A. Lange & Sohne would have far more name recognition among the general population than Rolex - the Walmart of luxury watches.

    • @xx-----------xx873
      @xx-----------xx873 2 роки тому

      @@bs12984 Apart from the Cellini, I have to agree.

    • @bs12984
      @bs12984 2 роки тому

      every watch company has one trick up its sleeves. panerai has the sandwich dial and the crown protector, ap has a hexagon bezel. patek has nautilus.
      no doubt lange is one of the greatest but we like it more because of its rarity and exclusivity.
      omega does the same with its speedmaster, 2 subdials or 3. overall watch is the same since decades. no new trick there.
      and now again talking about ap, no other company has introduced watches with so much variety as the AP did in royal oak and offshore series.

  • @michaelraven8764
    @michaelraven8764 2 роки тому

    Lovely Pentax MX there too

  • @sasaniris
    @sasaniris 2 роки тому

    Nice video. Thank you.

  • @tobiensam
    @tobiensam 2 роки тому

    Great video 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @Alejandro388
    @Alejandro388 2 роки тому

    me being p*ss poor, this particular video made me appreciate luxury watches like never before! Thank you!

  • @TheKillWizard
    @TheKillWizard Рік тому

    Great information

  • @fjrrz
    @fjrrz 2 роки тому

    Can you make a video about the Vacheron Constantin Overseas 47040 compared with the Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 please? Thank you

  • @lindokuhlezuma1791
    @lindokuhlezuma1791 Рік тому

    I loved this story ❤

  • @markdevera2342
    @markdevera2342 Рік тому

    Who would've thought "hex head" flat screws would be such a BIG HIT! =0

  • @lukerabin5079
    @lukerabin5079 2 роки тому +12

    Unfortunately, it just does nothing for me from a design perspective, and it’s not old enough to have any feeling of historical romance, I’m afraid.

  • @alistairg6770
    @alistairg6770 2 роки тому

    Love your videos...

  • @mk5354
    @mk5354 2 роки тому

    I'm curious as to the model # you have on your video. In particular I notice at least 3 different blue dials. The first is AP logo BELOW 12 with seconds hand, AP logo AT 12 with seconds hand, and AP logo above 6 without seconds hand. The most interesting to me is the AP logo below 12 because there is a half index marker at 3 next to the date. I'm not aware of any "full" size RO's with that feature; only the 33mm versions, but it's next to the full sized tourbillon in the side by side. Can you identify the model #?

    • @jamz113
      @jamz113 2 роки тому

      The first one is RO 15400, second one is RO 15300, and the last one is RO 15202. Look them up :). The 15202 is my grail.

  • @alpenkk
    @alpenkk 2 роки тому

    Well done guys 😀

  • @MTbone7
    @MTbone7 2 роки тому +2

    AP is a great brand. Of course you need a lot more than Rolex money to enjoy

    • @msbrownbeast
      @msbrownbeast 2 роки тому

      AP compared with Rolex is like Ferrari compared to Porsche. The Porsche will cost a lot less but will be more reliable and definitely more durable.

  • @falkenvir
    @falkenvir 11 місяців тому

    What is the use of the slotted profile of the screw? The screw is already locked by the Nut shaped hole?

  • @paulhiggins8774
    @paulhiggins8774 2 роки тому

    That was fascinating 👍

  • @morten170
    @morten170 2 роки тому

    Great video👍

  • @desmostradale
    @desmostradale 2 роки тому

    what happened too the Audio :/

  • @ahunter113
    @ahunter113 2 роки тому

    Mr Voice over dude. Do you also supply your relaxing voice for a true crime podcast? Thanks it's been nagging at me for ages now

  • @lewisham
    @lewisham 2 роки тому

    Paul Simon had a pretty good solo career though.

  • @michaelmallal9101
    @michaelmallal9101 2 роки тому

    I love AP.

  • @rfhsrzh2064
    @rfhsrzh2064 2 роки тому

    the Royal Oak is probably my favorite watch look wise

  • @majormickey9806
    @majormickey9806 2 роки тому

    Gerald Genta designed basically every watch I find attractive. Anyone please reply with a proper documentary/youtube/book about him that puts everything in context.

  • @ryantan5963
    @ryantan5963 2 роки тому

    Beautiful story telling, I love the royal oak design language...too bad I cannot afford it.

    • @pignosis354
      @pignosis354 2 роки тому

      The Maurice lacroix aikon looks quite similar! Usually I don’t buy “homage” watches but when the watch in question is well into unobtainium at 100,000+, I’ll make an exception for homages! Lol

  • @danysaliby9951
    @danysaliby9951 2 роки тому

    Nice video!

  • @omergenish8623
    @omergenish8623 2 роки тому +1

    Love your videos but this video title is horrible and dejecting.

  • @matteodifra
    @matteodifra 2 роки тому

    loved it!

  • @nav_pk
    @nav_pk 2 роки тому

    AP makes several amazing watches that are not Royal Oaks such as the ones in Code 11.59 collection but sadly that's overshadowed by the Royal Oaks. Guess it's good for us consumers in that we can still buy these amazing watches without having to worry about Grey market pricing.

  • @anthonychan6486
    @anthonychan6486 2 роки тому

    AP is iconic overall….but the bracelet is why I purchased the watch! Hold and inspect one and you will understand the genius that went into this art. The mechanism I can get anywhere in the top three brands.
    As for gold vs steel, any true watch connoisseur knows steel over gold any day…why tired yourself out wearing it!

    • @humblewiz4953
      @humblewiz4953 2 роки тому

      price at the time of your purchase?

  • @markstarmer3677
    @markstarmer3677 2 роки тому +1

    One of my grail watches.
    One day....

  • @paulsueb
    @paulsueb 2 роки тому

    Was waiting for this. Thank you

  • @Aalqalam
    @Aalqalam 2 роки тому

    goals

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing

  • @contaygious
    @contaygious 2 роки тому

    Bracelet is overrated. It pulls. My hairs. Great watch though. That chrono you showed has me interested!

  • @mrdripling4192
    @mrdripling4192 2 роки тому +8

    I can't get past the fact the "automatic" lettering on the plain face isn't straight. Pause it at 1:13, look, then tell me it's level.

    • @gearhead9828
      @gearhead9828 2 роки тому +2

      It's not level. Weird...

    • @Pete...NoNotThatOne
      @Pete...NoNotThatOne 2 роки тому +3

      I think it’s a bit of an illusion, the light is reflecting off the top part of the raised section differently from left to right. Have a look at 1:26 when it’s vertical, it looks straight there.
      EDIT: clearer shot at 1:35

    • @canpamukcu413
      @canpamukcu413 2 роки тому +2

      It isn't straight and slided towards right about 0,5 mm

    • @brrrrr9999
      @brrrrr9999 2 роки тому +2

      you're right; it's not level. And it's all the printed text too, by about the same degree. Guessing this one had a printing issue but it was within their own QC tolerances. Even at 1:35 you can see the discrepancy.
      Annoyingly I can't post the pic because YT keeps deleting it, but if you count pixels when it's level, you can reasonably see the discrepancy. Or you can open the pic "v8dPKgu" at the big pic hosting site that sounds like "image-r"
      (Modestly annoying that I had to type it out that way but I can understand it being an anti-spam control)

    • @mrdripling4192
      @mrdripling4192 2 роки тому +2

      @@brrrrr9999 I did the same screen shots, I'm gonna go post over at Watchfinder on twitter

  • @leftsidem5030
    @leftsidem5030 2 роки тому

    Brilliant story

  • @essential328
    @essential328 2 роки тому

    Awesome Media as always.. Not sure if Articles and conventional press would be interesting so

  • @veyuslavic2590
    @veyuslavic2590 2 роки тому

    The Royal Oak may very well be my White Wale.

  • @Vermontguy87
    @Vermontguy87 2 роки тому

    That is one good looking watch 😍

  • @AlwaysBolttheBird
    @AlwaysBolttheBird 2 роки тому

    Can someone tell me how the hex head screws on the bezel work. They aren’t actual screws right

  • @Befree9
    @Befree9 2 роки тому

    A watch with history can’t be beaten when all new brands last 10 years go look at what we call provenance take note everyone buy the best not what ppl are buying to look good

  • @amrsalem7143
    @amrsalem7143 2 роки тому

    What a story!

  • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
    @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 2 роки тому

    My Royal Oak is a great beater watch but for dressy occasions I prefer my JLC.

  • @jonidreas
    @jonidreas 2 роки тому

    Great video, great insights as always! My only criticism is the background music being the same in every video.

  • @cd1934
    @cd1934 2 роки тому +1

    AP= 97%Hype/3% value!!, it reminds me of a Who blow! , and that watch is all Hype!!.

    • @chriscraft999
      @chriscraft999 Рік тому

      You mean stamping a case from Steel and adding some plastic bits doesn't make a watch worth $10,000?

  • @deimos871102
    @deimos871102 2 роки тому

    Tissot seastar. Or the tissot PRX 80 anyone? Love it more then an AP RO, design, affordability.