Eff me! IT looks amazingly analog! Loving it! That nostalgic feel.. eagerly waiting for more footage of maybe more harsh color conditions with storng colored light and etc.
Anybody know if the Venice uses the Sony IMX410 image sensor. Looking at the Sony published IMX410 sensor specs and readout modes, and window cropping, they appear to line up absolutely identically with what the Venice does today.
Looks like a great camera. On the US Site the camera is reported to have 8 ND filters. Someone responded to a UA-cam question that Variable ND might come in a later version but Ed clearly says Variable ND (at 3:20). There is a matte box shown on the camera, perhaps that it is what he was actually using? Its a minor point but it might be worth clearing it up.
Ian H yes and no, it was a digital equivalent to 70mm. The sensor was touted as super 35 but it was much larger than that. This was why the camera was used a lot for Imax.
The F65 has a standard sized 17:9 super 35mm sensor which is 24.7 x 13.1mm. Venice has a Full Frame sensor which is 36 x 24mm. 70mm/65mm film has a frame approximately 52 x 23mm. So Venice sits roughly half way between super 35mm and 70mm and is a very similar size to VistaVision. The Venice sensor allows for full 18mm height 2x anamorphic production and the use of 65mm anamorphics with a reduced horizontal FOV..
Eff me! IT looks amazingly analog! Loving it! That nostalgic feel.. eagerly waiting for more footage of maybe more harsh color conditions with storng colored light and etc.
looks absolitely beautiful man! and kudos to the one filming the bts! one of the best ive seen in a long time!
Anybody know if the Venice uses the Sony IMX410 image sensor. Looking at the Sony published IMX410 sensor specs and readout modes, and window cropping, they appear to line up absolutely identically with what the Venice does today.
Ed sounded a bit miffed at having to use LED light in one room. So what would his preferred light be? Tungsten?
Beautiful!!!
That test does nothing for me!
Looks like a great camera. On the US Site the camera is reported to have 8 ND filters. Someone responded to a UA-cam question that Variable ND might come in a later version but Ed clearly says Variable ND (at 3:20). There is a matte box shown on the camera, perhaps that it is what he was actually using? Its a minor point but it might be worth clearing it up.
.3 and .6 on one wheel, .9 and 1.8 on another. Using the wheels together you get 8 permutations.
The filter might be used for IR or hor mirror on higher ND levels plus a polar maybe.
WOW 👑 SONY GOD FOREVER#1 ✌️ 👑
Like to put a GH5 along side it and shoot the same environment. I just wonder how much of a noticeable difference there would be.
A big fucking difference. GH5 dude, really?
So is it technically a 65mm sensor?
Ian H
Yeah it's basically the f65 successor. The only negative is that it doesn't have the f65s mechanical shutter.
The f65 was 35m though, right?
Ian H
yes and no, it was a digital equivalent to 70mm. The sensor was touted as super 35 but it was much larger than that. This was why the camera was used a lot for Imax.
is there a website that explains what you guys are talking about? i thought full frame 35mm video required only a 35mm sensor. im quite confused.
The F65 has a standard sized 17:9 super 35mm sensor which is 24.7 x 13.1mm. Venice has a Full Frame sensor which is 36 x 24mm. 70mm/65mm film has a frame approximately 52 x 23mm. So Venice sits roughly half way between super 35mm and 70mm and is a very similar size to VistaVision. The Venice sensor allows for full 18mm height 2x anamorphic production and the use of 65mm anamorphics with a reduced horizontal FOV..
WHY? I can find better footage from an alexa or red ALL DAY
this looks horrible for this price point. Completely unacceptable at this price.
How far does your experience with cinema cameras go
Not very far. This image looks amazing. Very similar to Alexa with reduced saturation above midtones.