Gross misrepresentation of what Kant meant by transcendental and transcendent compared to how you're using. Even the Kant quotes you put on your slides are incomplete, chopped, and makes no sense of what Kant meant. Very dubious.
„Nun können keine Erkenntnisse in uns stattfinden, keine Verknüpfung und Einheit derselben untereinander, ohne diejenige Einheit des Bewußtseins, welche vor allen Datis der Anschauungen vorhergeht, und, worauf in Beziehung, alle Vorstellung von Gegenständen allein möglich ist. Dieses reine ursprüngliche, unwandelbare Bewußtsein will ich nun die transzendentale Apperzeption nennen.“ Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1. Auflage A 107 I think it is pretty clear how Kant defines pure consciousness and that it is identical to description of pure consciousness in the Upanishad, the Veda etc ... or even the Yoga Sutra of Patanjali.
@@MaharishiVedaStiftung Pure consciousness of Kant is not the same, much less identical, to what the Vedas are referring. Kant's meaning is awareness uncontaminated by experience or particulars. This is something no one can escape. That is not what the Vedas are aiming for. Kant's awareness is something all of us experience. Vedic consciousness is a higher state of being, something to strive for and achieve. After looking at your video again, I see you're playing language games without regard to what the words, concepts, and meanings truly are referencing. Last point. The Vedas, Upanishads, and Patanjali don't need Western affirmation. If you're looking for such connections, then stick to scholars well-versed in both traditions. Otherwise you are fooling your audience.
What horeshit! Read Tucker :chapter in Phiilosphy and Myth in Karl Marx' German philosophy seeks to become god'( " its not only crazy; its blasphemy' Keikegard on Hegel )
Wonderful Dr Chandler🙏
in case further on Hegel at some point, would be more than fantastic!
Sure, we try to provide more on this topic ...
So valuable, thank you very much
Thank you !
Than you!
Gross misrepresentation of what Kant meant by transcendental and transcendent compared to how you're using. Even the Kant quotes you put on your slides are incomplete, chopped, and makes no sense of what Kant meant. Very dubious.
„Nun können keine Erkenntnisse in uns stattfinden, keine Verknüpfung und Einheit derselben untereinander, ohne diejenige Einheit des Bewußtseins, welche vor allen Datis der Anschauungen vorhergeht, und, worauf in Beziehung, alle Vorstellung von Gegenständen allein möglich ist. Dieses reine ursprüngliche, unwandelbare Bewußtsein will ich nun die transzendentale Apperzeption nennen.“
Immanuel Kant,
Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1. Auflage A 107
I think it is pretty clear how Kant defines pure consciousness and that it is identical to description of pure consciousness in the Upanishad, the Veda etc ... or even the Yoga Sutra of Patanjali.
@@MaharishiVedaStiftung Pure consciousness of Kant is not the same, much less identical, to what the Vedas are referring. Kant's meaning is awareness uncontaminated by experience or particulars. This is something no one can escape.
That is not what the Vedas are aiming for. Kant's awareness is something all of us experience. Vedic consciousness is a higher state of being, something to strive for and achieve.
After looking at your video again, I see you're playing language games without regard to what the words, concepts, and meanings truly are referencing.
Last point. The Vedas, Upanishads, and Patanjali don't need Western affirmation. If you're looking for such connections, then stick to scholars well-versed in both traditions. Otherwise you are fooling your audience.
What horeshit! Read Tucker :chapter in Phiilosphy and Myth in Karl Marx' German philosophy seeks to become god'( " its not only crazy; its blasphemy' Keikegard on Hegel )
Put down the vodka, Charlie