The Bert Jansch Foundation Tutorials - The Wheel

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2023
  • This lesson goes into some detail on methods for each section, with alternative fingering options. Refer to the notation and tab in Bert Transcribed volume 2, and to recorded versions from 1965 and 1968.
    0:05 - background
    2:22 - intro (bar 1)
    3:24 - right hand fingering (intro and pattern A)
    5:14 - pattern A
    7:39 - pattern B
    9:52 - pattern C
    18:48 - linking patterns
    20:00 - bonus pattern (1965)
    21:36 - run-through of A-B-C
    22:06 - pattern D
    26:35 - pattern E
    For a demo of the whole thing (more or less), go here: • Bert Jansch - The Wheel .

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @billallen1594
    @billallen1594 8 місяців тому +2

    Thank you for this.
    I’ve only just mastered ‘ running from home’ so please give me a decade or so to catch up 😅

  • @baljones
    @baljones 10 місяців тому

    Thanks x

  • @DjNikGnashers
    @DjNikGnashers 10 місяців тому +2

    Brilliant stuff Jon.
    I had a go at this and just couldn't seem to get anywhere with it, but might give it another go.
    I love the piece but for some reason I find it quite challenging.
    I didn't realised Bert Transcribed Vol 2 had this in, so thank you for mentioning it, I have just purchased a copy 🙂

  • @tehee-
    @tehee- 10 місяців тому +2

    Wonderful lesson video, yet one little thing I'd like to see; is that there would've been a full performance at the end. I'm a very visual learner and a full-speed performance would've given me a little more clues about the "C" or the difficult module in the middle. I've been trying to play "The Wheel" for around ten years and finding out a lot of my fingerings were fundamentally on point but incorrect to Bert is a suprise!

    • @Jonpriley
      @Jonpriley  10 місяців тому +2

      You're in luck! I just found a full run-through I made at the time (this lesson was originally done some months ago), and uploaded it here: ua-cam.com/video/oAZy1VWwL4s/v-deo.html.

    • @tehee-
      @tehee- 10 місяців тому +2

      @@Jonpriley Thank you kindly Jon! You're doing a great service to Bert's music and of course to the English-style guitar players out there.

  • @gio1989nni
    @gio1989nni 5 місяців тому

    Where did you take the tab? Thank you so much

    • @Jonpriley
      @Jonpriley  5 місяців тому +1

      I transcribed it from the record (both recorded versions) checking fingering from a live video. It's available in the book mentioned in the comments: www.musicroom.com/bert-jansch-bert-transcribed-the-bert-jansch-hl00403259

    • @gio1989nni
      @gio1989nni 5 місяців тому

      @@Jonpriley a fantastic job.

  • @thelordraj5412
    @thelordraj5412 5 місяців тому

    Hi where can I find the book referenced through out the video

    • @Jonpriley
      @Jonpriley  5 місяців тому

      www.amazon.co.uk/Bert-Transcribed-Jansch-Songbook-Vol/dp/170516062X

  • @baldheadedpriest
    @baldheadedpriest 10 місяців тому

    Got my volume 2 book today , the print text isn’t that prominent especially for the tab , is this standard or a fault

    • @Jonpriley
      @Jonpriley  10 місяців тому

      I think this is Hal Leonard's house style. The tab I sent them was clearer - larger font, and white-out around the numbers (breaking the lines though the numbers). It was apparent in the proofs stages that the latter was an issue (^0", "3" "6" and "8" easily get confused!), and I did mention it at least twice. The tab guide in the intro has white-out, so I didn't think it would be a problem for them. But the person I was dealing with, although she was very alert to other issues, was not the person responsible for the formatting, and somehow - with all the other tweaks and corrections that the proof-reading kept throwing, this issue got lost. I should have insisted on it more repeatedly, but when it comes to thing like a publisher's house style - and you assume that they know what they are doing, that other customers are fine with it - there's not much an outsider like me can do. I should say it looks a lot better in print than the low res PDF proofs did, but white-out would still have made a big difference. As would larger font in general! (The tiny staves in the intro examples are ridiculous, but - again - that's a house style issue.)