(126)The Larson Class

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • In today's episode of Truth OR Myth Beta, we're taking a look at the Larson Class, as first seen in Federation Ship Recognition Manual... I hope you enjoy!
    Want to help out the channel? Become a Patron of ours and receive some Great Perks!
    / tastudios
    Follow us on Twitter at
    / tas_youtube
    Follow us on Instagram at
    / tas_yt
    Want to see more of my Artwork, then join my Facebook Page at
    / davidklawitterdesigns
    Check out "ThatGuyAndres" Deviant Art Page!
    www.deviantart...
    Title Sequence Created By Siren
    Interested in the Space Engine Program? Check it out!
    spaceengine.org/
    Like the Ship? Try these Star Trek Space Engine Add Ons!
    steamcommunity...
    steamcommunity...
    A proud member of the TrekSphere Family, a website for ALL your Trek Needs!
    treksphere.com/
    All Star Trek and Star Trek related material is used under the fair use clause in copyright law, no trademark infringement intended
    #TruthORMyth #StarTrek #SciFi

КОМЕНТАРІ • 110

  • @batty2886
    @batty2886 2 роки тому +27

    Excellent video, as always. You know, have you ever considered making a beta video detailing the origins of the D'Deridex Class Warbird? There's so little we know about its origins.

  • @tmseh
    @tmseh 2 роки тому +9

    It's all about structural integrity. The Saladin left most of its primary systems sitting ducks in tactical combat.
    The Larson had a much stouter build, especially with the nacelle supports offering excellent coverage from acute angles.

  • @CaneMcKeyton
    @CaneMcKeyton 2 роки тому +14

    Ah, the much fabled and loved Larson class. One of the best ships to come out of FASA

  • @cesarsosaficachi5737
    @cesarsosaficachi5737 2 роки тому +12

    One of my favorite ship on FASA world 🖖🏻

  • @rochedl
    @rochedl 2 роки тому +10

    The Larson class was always fun to play. I tended to use them as system defense, so that their slow speed was not that much of an issue. And I would also have them in packs of three, they did have a tendency to be a bit on the fragile side.

    • @miamijules2149
      @miamijules2149 2 роки тому

      What game?

    • @f.r.wilson7603
      @f.r.wilson7603 2 роки тому +1

      @@miamijules2149 Star Trek: The Roleplaying Game by FASA. It was released in the early 80s.

  • @antwan1357
    @antwan1357 2 роки тому +3

    having a warp nacelle right above the bridge sounds like a death trap one explosion and you take out BOTH components

  • @darrensmith6999
    @darrensmith6999 2 роки тому +3

    2 Larson type necelles on a Constitution class now that would rock 😃

    • @f.r.wilson7603
      @f.r.wilson7603 2 роки тому +3

      If you did that then you would end up with a Loknar class. Which wouldn't be a bad thing. Next to the Larson, the Loknar is one of my favorite designs.

  • @majinjones4565
    @majinjones4565 2 роки тому +8

    Fantastic and informative as always great video. Nerd approved.

  • @troyspencer753
    @troyspencer753 2 роки тому +5

    Another great video! Thanks!!

  • @turkeytrac1
    @turkeytrac1 2 роки тому +3

    Great vid, have you done one on the DY-100, the class that included the SS botany bay?

  • @ROA_Offical
    @ROA_Offical 2 роки тому +6

    I have never heard of this class and this video did not disappoint a greatly written video for an amazing class thank you for taking time to put smiles on our faces (:

  • @richardfredericks4069
    @richardfredericks4069 2 роки тому +2

    Actually built a scratch model, using the AMT/Ertl kit of the larson class. U.S.S. Richtofin, used German WW1 decals for it. It was painted red

    • @f.r.wilson7603
      @f.r.wilson7603 2 роки тому

      I've been theorizing that it should be possible to make a model of the Larson using basic pieces from other designs. Thanks for confirming it!👍👍

  • @blindscience1701
    @blindscience1701 2 роки тому +2

    I love this class the first time I saw it on paper and later RPed this class before the refit version as the captain of the USS Bob Ross NCC - 332

  • @Trevor_Schindler
    @Trevor_Schindler 2 роки тому +4

    Good video, great so far as I am viewing. Thanks Tri!

  • @jamiewilliams4212
    @jamiewilliams4212 2 роки тому +4

    Always look forward to your videos man. You should do the surya class . It's like the cool tos reliant. I'd love to hear your custom take on it

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому

      Thank you so much, and dont worry, Ive already reskined the model so I could make a video about it in the future :)

  • @jaddokproductions2470
    @jaddokproductions2470 2 роки тому +4

    Bravo. Bravo.
    Keep bringing these videos

  • @star86703
    @star86703 2 роки тому +6

    Interesting ship design I always look forward to new videos thank you😊

  • @f.r.wilson7603
    @f.r.wilson7603 2 роки тому +1

    I loved this class, so much potential. My FASA fleet had three of them. Their superior maneuverability always had the bad guys on the run.
    If I remember correctly, FASA came out with a MK 8 design that could incorporate the newer upgrades. Making for a fast, reliable and deadly design.

  • @georgesulea
    @georgesulea 2 роки тому +6

    Thanks for this; a very comprehensive and interesting take on this class of ship.

  • @sjTHEfirst
    @sjTHEfirst 2 роки тому +3

    Did having the box section added for the shuttle bays also allow room for a bowling alley and swimming pool?

  • @canadianweez
    @canadianweez 2 роки тому +2

    Love the Larson! I built a model of a movie-era version, with new nacelle, incorporated deflector, new shuttle bays etc.

    • @f.r.wilson7603
      @f.r.wilson7603 2 роки тому

      I would love details on how you did it, because I so want to build one.

  • @srvfan454
    @srvfan454 5 місяців тому

    I really love the FASA ships. I never had anyone to play with as a kid, but I still love that game.

  • @Uchilsson
    @Uchilsson 2 роки тому +3

    Nice, I would like to see this ship in refit verison. It coiuld be nice.

  • @stevenewman1393
    @stevenewman1393 10 місяців тому +2

    🖖😎👍Very cool and very nicely well done and executed and informatively explained in every detail way shape and form provided on this format and subject matter on the Larson class destroyer and of it's main power source and functions plus its duties and abilities and fire power and so forth indeed!,👌.

  • @johnmogavero8156
    @johnmogavero8156 2 роки тому +1

    I have always loved the FASA Larson and Loknar class ships

  • @smudgeone
    @smudgeone 2 роки тому +2

    I always enjoy your story telling. Another neat little ship from the TOS (those old scientists) era of design. Every time you show the Discovery battle scene it makes me feel sad how they have little blue lasers appear from anywhere on the hull instead of actually having hard points to fire from. Shows how much care the the TNG era SFX teams took when animating their battles. Your space engine animations also look very nice.

    • @johnkinnicutt4509
      @johnkinnicutt4509 2 роки тому +1

      Not having visible hard points actually keeps with design philosophy of TOS, Roddenberry didn't want weapon ports or cannons visible, The Enterprise was an exploratory vessel that had to be powerful but not appear threatening to first contacts, that said she needed to have warship capabilites for trouble and frontier defense. In my head Canon, the ports are concealed by armored hatches until red alert situations and open automatically for combat as phasers charge and photons are armed

  • @EmpyreanFrost
    @EmpyreanFrost 2 роки тому +1

    Papa TAS giives us another gift.

  • @borusa32
    @borusa32 Рік тому

    Super-I love many of those FASA designs.

  • @Canoby
    @Canoby 2 роки тому +1

    Another FASA classic, gotta love them

  • @dominik8005
    @dominik8005 2 роки тому +2

    Wow very nice Information Video

  • @clivemahony9827
    @clivemahony9827 3 місяці тому +1

    Really great video 👍 love the model 😁

  • @LMG1792
    @LMG1792 2 роки тому

    So had to come find this video after us talking about it on Twitter lol

  • @-johnny-deep-
    @-johnny-deep- 2 роки тому +2

    Seems to me they could have just put two of the standard nacelles on this ship and not bother with all the work designing a single nacelle with mor power. What’s the advantage of a single nacelle over two? Also, all these different ship designs are fun to see, but other than that one that’s basically a cargo container transporter, I think just having more Constitution class ships would suffice for almost all purposes.

    • @f.r.wilson7603
      @f.r.wilson7603 2 роки тому +2

      The advantage of the single nacelle is cheaper costs, lower maintenance, and shorter construction time. The brilliance of the Larson was they could pump out a lot of them in half the time of the Consitution and still have a formidable force.

    • @MrSheckstr
      @MrSheckstr 2 роки тому +1

      @@f.r.wilson7603 as you said, a single propulsion unit means not having to ballance propulsion output between the two units

  • @lucasodelta2591
    @lucasodelta2591 2 роки тому

    that shot at the crossfield class

  • @tjfm59
    @tjfm59 8 місяців тому

    redo the angle of the warp pylons from the 30' built as to 45' this gives more volume inside the pylon area. next run a horizontal deck / bar across the pylon space. up high enough that torpedo tubes can be placed in the bar. say 4 fwd & 4 aft. upgrade the phasers to arrays as well.

  • @Ronald006
    @Ronald006 2 роки тому +2

    Once again i nod in respect to your creative way to telling an origin story. well done 100/100 have you ever heard of the tos/ pre tos Armstrong class ?

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you... And are you talking about the Armstrong Class from the Kelvin Movies that soneone converted to a TOS Style Ship?

    • @Ronald006
      @Ronald006 2 роки тому +1

      @@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics not from that kelvin timeline it's a tos ship built around the same time as the Asia class

    • @Ronald006
      @Ronald006 2 роки тому +1

      @@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics no it was not a kelvin verse vessel it was starfleets attempt at a more advanced starship for it's time it only had two nacells tho not four I'll see if I can dig up the picture for you.

    • @jefferyyoung2580
      @jefferyyoung2580 2 роки тому +1

      I love the star ship 🚢

    • @jefferyyoung2580
      @jefferyyoung2580 2 роки тому

      Looking a table on one leg

  • @markaous1212
    @markaous1212 2 роки тому +1

    For some reason I think it fits more in discovery than tos. Could have warped in during the binaries

  • @daviddyster4145
    @daviddyster4145 2 роки тому +1

    That is one ship that should remain in beta canon.

  • @TheDing1701
    @TheDing1701 2 роки тому

    Oh, FASA--- how I loved thee!

  • @robertwhatley9861
    @robertwhatley9861 2 роки тому +1

    Good video. Never seen this one before.
    You mentioned fighters. Is there enough info to do a video on trek fighter craft?

  • @bear8696
    @bear8696 Рік тому

    you dont need to be a race horse to be a work horse. i would have kept them around to fulfill to rolls you discussed in some of your recent videos. back line supplies. yeah your ships of the line, front line ships need to go zoom zoom fast. supply ships can get by with warp 6. Star bases and system defense ships don't even need that. you got phasers? torpedoes? shields? use it the same way you would the Archer class.

  • @neves5083
    @neves5083 2 роки тому +2

    I absolutely love one nacelle ships

  • @flyingfortress15
    @flyingfortress15 2 роки тому

    Very nice

  • @ckmbyrnes
    @ckmbyrnes 2 роки тому +1

    Seems to me if they were worried about space on the saucer section, they (Star Fleet) would not design a concave shape on the bottom of the hull. They could easily get two more decks if it was flat or mirrored the shape of the upper part of the hull.

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому +1

      I take it you mean 2 Bigger Decks :P But you have to remember, it's human nature to mix form with function... Doing what you suggest, would take away from the beauty of the saucer form! Besides, this is SciFi, and SciFi rarely designs boxes with warp nacelles which would have no space problems at all!

  • @Mike28625
    @Mike28625 3 місяці тому

    Dude. You could take two Larsons and stick them belly to belly. Double thick saucer with over and under nacelles.

  • @Trevor_Schindler
    @Trevor_Schindler 2 роки тому +2

    Always first!

  • @EricFeldmann
    @EricFeldmann Рік тому

    have you done any civian ships like thechameleon class starship? or

  • @jodybranson925
    @jodybranson925 2 роки тому

    isn't the Larson class a sister ship of The Nelson scout ?

  • @davidnachbaur6805
    @davidnachbaur6805 2 роки тому

    Interesting design I see the single nacelle being a hindering issue. You would think that, they would make it longer to accommodate the extra coils.

  • @Lt.Saavik
    @Lt.Saavik 2 роки тому

    But the Beta-canon also has references to ships that have been refitted and served for a long time (for example, USS Caspian NCC-5507, although, of course, his number is high enough for the bulk of the Larson's - perhaps it was removed from the storage of ships with re-registration.
    In FASA 2302 (SRM) both - the original and refit version - are also shown.

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому

      And thus youve witnessed first hand the problem with Beta Canon and why its meaningless... Most times different sources conflict with eachother!

    • @Lt.Saavik
      @Lt.Saavik 2 роки тому

      @@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics But there is plenty to choose from, which gives space for creativity, and this is wonderful in its own way.)

  • @mattlawler8794
    @mattlawler8794 2 роки тому

    I don’t think the Daystrom Institute existed yet when Duotronics were invented. Daystron himself came up with duotronicp

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому

      As the sentence says, created and DEVELOPED by... Meaning shortly after inventing the tech, Daystrom created the Institute to develop it!

  • @jntaylor63
    @jntaylor63 2 роки тому

    God I love the FASA ships, well most of them. Some were duds.

  • @super_ficial
    @super_ficial 5 місяців тому +1

    If only Kirk had stolen the Larson instead of the Excelsior, we could call it the Grand Larson.

  • @ricknick5318
    @ricknick5318 Рік тому

    Made out of the romulan bird of prey

  • @starfleet.command
    @starfleet.command Рік тому

    Inverted Einstein class

  • @LuisVazquez-hx3bk
    @LuisVazquez-hx3bk 2 роки тому

    The problems is that we don't know how a single nacelle can produce a warp bobble. 😤
    Is not logical!!!

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому

      Yes we do... Since there have been Canon 1 Nacelle designs, we know they produce a warp bubble the EXACT same way as any other starship design!

    • @LuisVazquez-hx3bk
      @LuisVazquez-hx3bk 2 роки тому

      @@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      You know that the only ship without warp drive that can go in to warp speed is the klingon birth of prey?
      If there is no warp nacelles, there is no need for warp drive.

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому

      Im sorry you're incorrect... A Klingon Bird of Prey DOES have a warp drive, it's just a different type that doesnt require nacelles, with the warp bubble being generated by the S2 Graf Unit integrated in the Impulse Generators... Meaning, a Klingon BofP actually has only 1 Nacelle! ;)

    • @LuisVazquez-hx3bk
      @LuisVazquez-hx3bk 2 роки тому

      @@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      This is who the logic of star trek cannon has to be change for the fantasy of star wars with no cannon what so ever.

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому

      No, there's logic and it's absolutely fine... The only illogical thing here, is your comments :P

  • @GatchamanG4
    @GatchamanG4 2 роки тому

    I’m sorry but that’s one ugly ship

  • @theelaffingman8776
    @theelaffingman8776 2 роки тому

    That is one ugly design, I gotta say...lol.

  • @danielbusbey4686
    @danielbusbey4686 2 роки тому +1

    Toooooooo much horn blowing. Give the information !!!!!!!!

    • @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics
      @TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics  2 роки тому +5

      Guess you're just proof that you cant please everyone LOL

    • @travisbrunette3070
      @travisbrunette3070 2 роки тому +3

      This guy doesn't know what he's talking about Tri! Your vids are always the best and are always outstanding just as they are. You wouldn't have almost 50000 subs if they weren't. I think this guys jealousy is just shining through