Closing the Biggest Mystery of the Great Pyramid
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 тра 2024
- This is the video that solves the mystery.
The Great Pyramid has always stood out as the structure that nobody could surpass, and everyone after wanted to copy. But was it size alone that made it special, or did it come with a more profound change in ancient Egypt?
This video looks at the evolution of dynastic Egyptian burials - scrutinizes the design of their defenses, and shows how the Great Pyramid achieved a dream more impressive than anyone has imagined.
Now the real questions begin, and the wisdom of ancient Egypt will no longer be taken for granted.
--------------------
Join this channel to get access to livestreams: / @historyforgranite
--------------------
Thanks to the Isida Project for many photos within the Great Pyramid: isida-project.ucoz.com/
Thanks to Keith Hamilton and Jon Bodsworth for a Great Pyramid portcullis photo
Quotation Sources:
Dieter Arnold “Building in Egypt” Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, 1991 Pp. 223
W. M. Flinders Petrie “The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh” New and Revised Edition, Histories & Mysteries of Man Ltd, London, 1990, Pp. 71
Graphics Sources:
Dieter Arnold “Building in Egypt” Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, 1991
Reg Clark “Securing Eternity: Ancient Egyptian Tomb Protection from Prehistory to the Pyramids” The American University in Cairo Press, New York. 2019
Reg Clark “Tomb Security in Ancient Egypt from the Predynastic to the Pyramid Age” Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, Oxford, 2016
Gilles Dormion & Jean-Patrice Goidin “Les Nouveaux Mystères de le Grande Pyramide” Albin Michel, Paris, 1987
Gilles Dormion “La chambre de Cheops” Librairie Artheme Fayard, 2004
“Scanning the Pyramids” HIP Institute, 2017
Jean-Pierre Houdin “Khufu Reborn - Dassault Systemes” 2013
• Khufu Reborn - Dassau...
John Shae Perring “The Pyramids of Gizeh: Part I. The Great Pyramid” London, 1839
John Shae Perring “The Pyramids of Gizeh: Part II. The Great Pyramid” London, 1840
John Shae Perring “Pyramids to the Southward of Gizeh: Part III” London, 1842
W. M. Flinders Petrie “The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh” Field & Tuer London, 1883
00:00 Intro
2:34 Mastaba evolution
4:37 Portcullis evolution
6:41 Great Pyramid security design
9:29 Maneuvering with ropes
11:35 Robbing techniques
14:07 Attacking the Great Pyramid
16:54 Controlling weight
19:10 Open sesame
22:00 Mental blocks
24:24 Comparing passages
28:09 Security philosophy
30:10 Questions answered
31:41 The Big Question
34:17 Attractive forces
36:42 Time for change
"you shall remember me, for I will provide you eternal employment as tour guides!"
I like this explanation. ❤
Khufu's ultimate Legacy
@@JoelRSmith LOL
too funny!
me like it
I just love how your whole brand is not taking history for granted/granite. It's really clever. Your first principles approach is really knocking it out of the park. Well done!
OUTSTANDING!
The pyramids were tourist attractions all along.
Congratulations: you've shaken Egyptology!
🤣😂🤣😂 n I 💭 the piramids were some energy source
@@alvarosolano-jb1qqugh you people can’t shut up can you
😄
That's why they were built to accept both visa and MasterCard at the entrance. . .
@@Bassillixx
and poured in the 30s
It blows my mind how much I love this channel. Egyptology isn't even a particular interest of mine, but I can't stop watching these videos. It's just so good. This is top tier work and so relaxing and educational
Its so interesting how the most mind-blowing theories always have a mundane quality to them. For me, thats what makes them ring true.
Since anthropology is the study of human behavior it makes sense that our best anthropologic theories invoke a sense of "oh ok, that makes sense. That's probably what I would do to im their situation".
@@justinsemple7454 I came here hopeful but was sadly disappointed. I agree with your sentiment, but didn't find it here.
There is actual evidence published almost two years ago that hardly anyone is covering.
So that's what I was expecting,
Looks to me like someone has spent a lot of time
and effort
and time is money as they say,
putting a puzzle together with out all the pieces.
What kind of leader would force thousands
or hundreds of thousands
of loyal subjects to build a contraption this mass-ive
this ego driven symbol of greatness
...To protect a few valuables and a body,
for as long as possible.
Which didn't work
because it must have been pilfered,
There's no evidence,
They - took it.
This story has more holes than swiss cheese.
I feel so embarrassed for the guy behind the curtain.
Modern people, 1800's ish on, located and busted out those holes
in the pharaoh's and queen's chambers.
It is a resonator those were meant to be sealed.
Try beating on a drum that has no drum skin...
Impossible.
No one is going to break in to it because it would be benefiting the entire population.
Only someone bent on destruction would disable it. For Good or For Evil.
There are too many factors to continue right now, but the evidence we have confirmed up until 2018 just doesn't leave room for sociopathic slave driver transitioning to a soul.
Quite the opposite if some new theories pan out.
I really have to go and with yt hiding so much I don't really know if anyone will read this.
Just take this piece and dwell on it... search the etymology for Chemist
..most won't so i'll through you a bone.
AL- in Arabic is "the" + Chemist =Alchemist
Alchemy was the "chemistry" of the Middle Ages and early modern times, involving both occult and natural philosophy and practical chemistry and metallurgy.
In 1560 they knew this.
Alchemy- From the land of Khem, khemet, al-kimiya, (khemeioa found c.300 C.E),
Khemia- Land of Black Earth
Much Love
I came up with a plausible idea of how the pyramids were constructed. Basically, the builders used the sides of the pyramids as the ramp. A temporary smooth facing 'ramp', very similar to the finished smooth pyramid exterior, would have been built on at least two sides, opposite of each other, as the pyramid was built. This 'ramp' would only need to have been about 20 or so feet wide. I say "temporary" ramp because the stones pulled up on them would have worn the surface of the stones - but they could have been re-surfaced and reused. Sand spread in front of the stones would reduce friction. Or maybe the temporary ramp sitting on the 'steps' of the pyramid could have been made of wood, with wooden skids under the stones being pulled up to reduce friction. Adding water would reduce friction even more.
The way it would work, is ropes would have been draped over a log pulley near the top edge of the pyramid, crossed over to the opposite side, gone over another pulley, and down the pyramid on the opposite side. The workers own weight helping pull downhill would have made it much easier *and faster* to pull the blocks up the opposite side. When the workers reached the bottom, they would attached their ropes to the *next stone,* and a 2nd group of workers on the opposite side would pull it up, as the first group climbed up to prepare to repeat the process. There could have easily been two additional groups of workers on the other two sides working at the same time.
The stones all the way to the top, including the capstone, could have been raised this way.
The idea is simple and effective.
@@FLPhotoCatcher you should make a video with some diagrams to better illustrate your idea
@@FLPhotoCatcher Or gravity wasn’t a mystery in the golden age, as it seems to be today.
And giants although well documented throughout history are too taboo to even suggest.
The pyramids harnessed the power of falling water by resonance.
Breaking into the walls to find these secret “tunnels” most definitely would prevent it from working.
New evidence is being covered up and theories like the one presented here are not helping us to understand.
My previous comment was about that.
But no doubt it is hidden under newest. Which means no one is going to scroll through thousands of comments to see it.
You just fixed Egyptology. You deserve an honory doctorate. Bravo.
I'm curious; how did he fixed Egyptology?
@@NickTriHard Did you not watch the video?
I really enjoyed this explanation and obvious genius! It dramatically changes the perspective. If you think of the King's Chamber as his throne room and all the stone design and structure surrounding as the "security" with special passageways .. leading directly to important spaces .. even some hidden places honor the king's genius. I wonder what the great void above the grand gallery will reveal?
@@bernielove3019 I watched the video.
What did he fix or which new idea did he propose?
*Literally nothing.*
I would add that the very fact that the channels people walk in cause them to be bent over in submission for long periods of time as they approach the queen's chamber and the king's chamber / grand gallery.
This has to be one of the most cogent, reasonable, and sensible explanations I've heard. This channel keeps getting better.
@34:40 This video brought me to tears! Oh my god, man! Especially this quote! "it's not a mountain of stone to keep people out its amount of stone to keep people coming inside" ❤
"only the living can protect the dead" ❤
I have a powerful “Giggidy” right then
I just entered the great pyramid yesterday and it was not easy. There’s no way those tight narrow passages were meant for regular foot traffic.
@@haaggus priests
Same thing.
From a young man that observes the bent & red pyramid from his room window ,
" tons " of thanks .
❤
what are some of the best underrated pyramids to visit besides the giza, step, red, bent, and miadum pyramids?
Sorry buy nah
@@-jank-willson ramses 2 is nice to see it is not a pyramid but stil a amazing building
Do you think the builders woke up one day and decided, let's build a pyramid ? It is evident they were built by an extremely advanced civilization for purposes unknown. Probably energy production and distribution ! !!!
@@JOKing-ku8jg History is fake and was deliberately falsified to hide the truth
The truth about building the pyramids is found in the Holy Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad with conclusive evidence
There are giants who inhabited the Earth thousands of years ago and they are the ones who built this monument
The height of our master Adam was 37 meters, and the creation after him was similar to his creation. Then the size of the creation decreased until it reached where we are now.
The Prophet Muhammad did not visit Egypt, but God revealed the Qur’an to him, and everything was mentioned in the Qur’an in clear detail
With all impartiality, reason and clear logic
The pyramids could not be built except by humans who had tremendous strength, which made them lift all these stones with ease
89- Al-Fagr / 7 and 8
إِرَمَ ذَاتِ ٱلۡعِمَادِ
(7) [With] Iram[1915] - who had lofty pillars,[1916]
[1915]- Another name for the first people of ʿAad, to whom Prophet Hūd was sent.
[1916]- Supporting their tents or buildings.
ٱلَّتِي لَمۡ يُخۡلَقۡ مِثۡلُهَا فِي ٱلۡبِلَٰدِ
(8) The likes of whom had never been created in the land?
26- ash-shuara / 128
أَتَبۡنُونَ بِكُلِّ رِيعٍ ءَايَةٗ تَعۡبَثُونَ
(128) Do you construct on every elevation a sign,[1055] amusing yourselves,
[1055]- i.e., a symbol or indication of their wealth and power. They used to build lofty structures along the road to be seen by all who passed by.
41- Fussilat / 15
فَأَمَّا عَادٞ فَٱسۡتَكۡبَرُواْ فِي ٱلۡأَرۡضِ بِغَيۡرِ ٱلۡحَقِّ وَقَالُواْ مَنۡ أَشَدُّ مِنَّا قُوَّةًۖ أَوَلَمۡ يَرَوۡاْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ ٱلَّذِي خَلَقَهُمۡ هُوَ أَشَدُّ مِنۡهُمۡ قُوَّةٗۖ وَكَانُواْ بِـَٔايَٰتِنَا يَجۡحَدُونَ
(15) As for ʿAad, they were arrogant upon the earth without right and said, "Who is greater than us in strength?" Did they not consider that Allāh who created them was greater than them in strength? But they were rejecting Our signs
Please read the Qur’an carefully and you will find everything you are looking for
The pyramids seem so much more human when thought of as places designed for people to keep visiting over years and years. Fascinating.
And we still do :D
But where are the hieroglyphs and inspiring imagery then?
It was not design for people. Majority of the shafts are way too short for humans and you have to crouch walk all the way up the shaft to get to the grand gallery. It makes no sense for humans to be inside. Some of the shafts in the pyramid are only 8 inches wide.
@@brosettastone7520
Most rulers of old preferred everyone to approach them on their knees or at least bent.
Pyramids seem more human..You been chongin more weed than me...They seem like big rocks stuck ontop of each other to me 😂😂❤❤
@@MarkoKraguljacDidn't you know they were big power plants that zoomed the annunacki to bs land and back..
I can't read through the ~2000 comments to see if anyone has pointed this out, but you have imagined a limitation in the levering process that doesn't exist. This has led you to the erroneous conclusion that three successive blocking slabs would make entrance by prying almost impossible.
You have correctly pointed out that one way of raising the blocking slab would be to raise the fulcrum after each few small lifting stages as the block is raised. Your drawing at about 12:43 illustrates this. But this drawing also illustrates the fatal flaw in your understanding about how the levering process would be carried out. That drawing shows the block raised half way with red arrows indicating that the lever can only be pulled halfway to the floor. Why? Why would you stop with the lever arm only halfway to the floor? With the proper fulcrum design the lever can be pulled down all the way to the floor.
You may have presumed that this limitation exists because of the shape of the fulcrum you drew, which for some reason has changed from the round shape you showed at the beginning of the process to a shape with an extended flat top. No one would ever use a fulcrum shaped like that because when the lever arm got to the horizontal position it would begin to pivot around the edge of the fulcrum farthest from the slab, drastically lowering the mechanical advantage of the long lever arm.
Instead you would want the fulcrum to have the same kind of round top you showed initially or, better, a narrow round top with a small radius of curvature, perhaps with a sheet of metal between it and the wooden lever to prevent the fulcrum tip from chewing into the wood lever during use.
Using a fulcrum like this, the process of lifting the slab, blocking it in position, raising the fulcrum and lifting again can be repeated indefinitely, using the full height of the passageway to swing the lever arm at each stage. In fact, by putting wood or stone spacers between the working end of the lever and the slab, the slab can be recessed into the ceiling and then blocked in place there. In practice, spacers would probably be used earlier in the lifting process to avoid having to raise the fulcrum too high.
But however however it's accomplished, the important point here is that by a combination of raising the fulcrum and using spacers the lever arm can be moved from the ceiling to the floor at all stages of the lifting process, enabling each blocking slab to recessed into the ceiling if desired.
No heart. I think you made him big mad lol.
This seems to me to be an argument in favour of the portcullis stones being designed to afford short term protection and also to allow regular access. The method you describe would require hours of work on the part of robbers, sufficient I would imagine to frustrate an attempt to lever a way in overnight. And, on the other hand, the existence of methods to lever up the stones given a day or so would suggests that the pyramid builders would not rely on the portcullis stones alone permanently to seal off the treasures within.
You are correct that with ideal tools and knowledge, levering up the full height of the portcullis is possible. But the ancients had many constraints, not the least of which would be possessing and transporting the necessary plundering equipment into the pyramid. With a straight wooden lever and crude, modestly stackable fulcrums the difficulty still increases with height. At the very least it would slow you way down, and the time of attack was the key point in the video - not that levering HAD to be constrained but that it probably was.
So many words to say so little
Wrong
Since some of your videos before I had the feeling, that this explanation could be the most logical I heard before! At one evening in Egypt 29 years ago I had the chance to be one of the last visitors in the great Pyramid and I was completely alone in the king's chamber! I still remember these feelings and this explanation fits best to them. Thank you so much for your ongoing work!
Excellent video, as always! It makes more sense that these monuments were symbolic temples of admonition than tombs "attempting to hide" a dead King and his treasure. Wonderful presentation and congratulations on this efficient and pragmatic theory! It's one of the few that makes any sense to me.
correct. when you go inside of the pyramid, there are no hieroglyphics, consistent with those in other temples etc...just empty
And considering how many religions build temples and churches containing bones of their saints which are very much on display...
The worst nightmare for a mummy is to get destroyed. Their whole mindset was immortality since the mummy is eternal if untouched. You build the pyramid as if it’s a puzzle that takes very long time to solve while the sarcophagus is hidden somewhere else but with no attention at all.
@@kreteraketeLet's take one pyramid, The Great Pyramid; the granite quarry is 300 miles away, all the blocks are different. If 10 were cut, dressed, transported, placed, a day... it would take over 630 years to construct... that's one pyramid, not taking anything else that Egypt has, into account. It was not 'Egyptian' nor for 'mummies'. Whatever did it and why, is not human only and not for any frickin tomb.
@@jeremybartlett1706you are esoteric and without scientific knowledge 😂
This should be in the news!!! It all makes sense 😮
Yes you're right it's perfect for CNN (The Fake News)!!!
this should be in the news.. its all bs.. they were re purposed after the gods left.. earth.. 13k ago,, after the flood they made, subsided.. there was a water mark on the pyramids, 1/3 rd up.. wiped clean, the interiors cleaned,, then sold to the dmb tourists as burials..
Great video but few questions that are not clear to me...
1. If the intention was to keep the KC "visitable" with the mechanism of the openable then:
- Why were the granite plugs planned in place? It must have been part of the original design due to the mechanist that stop the stones. Also it would be impossible to carry those into the pyramid once the grand gallery was closed. It is a wierd to think that ancient egyptians put so much effort to such a complitacted design to make it a "temporary" thing. If it was designed to be temporary why simply not close down the portcullis after the mourning period (or whatever)
- Why it's not the case for the other 2 pyramids in Giza?
- If the king really wanted this tomb to be a sacrad place to visit I assume the opportuniy was rather for the rich, governant officials, priests, etc... not for the regular people. If so why do such inconvenient corridors? We see that they could build convenient corridors (nort face corridor with 2 meter width and height or the grand gallery itself!). For anybody to visit the King's chamber in ancient times would needed to enter the pyramid, walk down 28 meters in a 1 meter by 1.3 meter small, airless corridor, then start crawl upwards in a similar tiny corridor (assuming there was some ladder at the block ascending passage) that does not even have stairs carved into the original floor, just to reach the grand gallery. Oh, and ofc without artifical ligh source, so either with a candle or a torch... From there the struggle continues in the Grand Gallery (at least there is enough space) till they reach the KC. Also without stairs carved into the flooring. I belive in your earlier videos you even mentioned how dangerous was this trip only a few hundred years ago. How do we expect this 4000 years ago from an older priest? Or anybody from the royal family?
- Not to mentioned the 3 granite plugging stone must have been laying in the grand gallery somewhere, probably obstructing the movement of visitors.
I am no pharao but if I wanted my subordinates and family to visit me "in my grave" why not just build a simple, straight corridor with convenient dimensions (e.g.: like the north face corridor?) that straight leads to the grand gallery. And make some stairs for them, so it's easier to walk up.
The architects shouldn't have any problem with that as they are confident enough to build (even build 2 if we count the big void) a massive, spacious corridor in the middle of the biggest pyramid. They could just simply build the whole grand gallery down to ground level for even easier access.
As things looks like now I am not convinced that Khufu really wanted his burial site to be visited....
The plug stones may have been counter-weights for the portcullis stones and then became plug stones. A designed failure point. If the knowledge of how to keep it working was ever lost the stones would become plugs when the rigging failed.
Making the entry and exit physically arduous could deter visitors with sticky fingers. Maybe there was a human powered wooden sled that moved people up and down. In a truly dark environment a single candle is surprisingly bright once your eyes adjust.
It's hard to imagine lots of people moving throughout the pyramid though, but maybe that was part of the mystic. I can only imagine what it would evoke in a person. It would be a memorable experience....as it still is today.
Well what's ground level to us is not what's ground level to them, also it was probably to see the him after death or rituals ect for a period of time or yearly ect then to be plugged for ever from the outside
Why are castles and palaces built with so large amount of stairs and chambers and secret doors even if the king wants his people/ family to visit him. Why not just build a simple straight corridor with convenient dimensions? Why did ancient Chinese emperor build at huge as Terracotta Army that guards his grave even tho he obviously wanted people to visit the grave?
Besides the plugs being permanent, the only additional thing illogical to me about his argument, is that If portcullis stones sealing the entrance were intended to be opened for public visitation, where is the evidence that they were opened repeatedly? Should be very easy to see: a wear pattern between the sliding doors and the walls demonstrating that they were repeatedly opened for the public to access. I have never heard of any evidence that this pattern exists, but if they were opened repeatedly, this wear pattern would be distinct and as irrefutable as ballistic forensics. To the contrary, it seems like the portcullis stones were lowered permanently, which contradicts the entire premise of the conclusion that the tomb was indented to be a Disneyland which only closed down at night. I'm not really interested in Egypt, but I do like arguments to make logical sense, and I find some illogical thoughts in the presentation.
From what we know of ancient Egyptian society, they had some pretty strange ideas (from our perspective) about the nature of existence, the powers that govern that existence and the afterlife. That thought process introduces a factor that we will probably never fully understand and thus the behaviour it inspired will remain, to a large degree, a mystery.
This is an amazing theory. I've been fascinated by Egyptology since I was a little kid, for almost 40 years. I've always wanted the Great Pyramid to be something more worthy of the intelligence and effort of the people who created it, not just a fancy pile of rocks to put a dead body in. Your theory rings more true to my gut feeling that there must have been more to it, while being a more grounded explanation than aliens or ancient power plants. The simplicity of your explanation for the Queen's chamber left my mouth hanging open. I'm dying to know if you have any speculation on what the voids they've recently detected could be.
One of your best videos. I feel the culmination of years of research poured into this great view of pyramids
Thanks 4 your hard work in making these useful work
Seems like your research might have taken as long as it took to build the pyramids…
So the pyramids the " lights" are basically CATHEDRALS!
That makes so much sence.
Brilliant logic. No more Indiana Jones style traps. The Pharaoh’s power and ingenuity on display. And yet, even with all the pretentious display, a humble admission that all barriers will eventually fall. As I said before, I’m not an Ancient Egyptian aficionado. I realize now that I never paid much attention to Pyramid design because it all seemed so messy. But in one video you have instilled in me an admiration for these ancient architects and their clever and practical designs. Thank you again for your efforts. I will certainly continue watching.
Many thanks, it's been a pleasure sharing the work.
Well...if he paid for someone to guard the place at night, he wouldn't need to be so worried. And he would certainly have expected the whole area to be pretty damn busy for the foreseeable future. There would have been guards, surely. Sure...one day the money ran out, people stopped using the site, the guards couldn't be paid, etc...but nothing is forever. He woulda known that day was coming, surely. So any security measures are just delaying the inevitable. But we don't know what Khufu believed. Even when you know what someone's religion is, you don't know what they BELIEVE. If he was like most people with power, religion was just a tool, and he knew it was all crap all along. Seems weird to build a pyramid for some afterlife crap you don't believe in. And what did they think happens to a guy in the afterlife if his body and treasures back on Earth are destroyed? I think there's a good chance Khufu was never in there. A switcheroo could be pulled if he was worried about his eternal afterlife being cut short by grave robbers. So regardless of Khufu's religious beliefs (or lack of), I think all we can say is that the dude still wanted to have a huge fuckoff triangle in the desert. So I really don't believe the pyramid was just some resurrection machine he believed would beam him up. Cus like I said....dude KNEW with 100% certainty, that the day would come when robbers got in, or the whole pyramid was eroded to nothing. Unless their belief is that you just gotta upload the pharoah and his treasures once, and they get copied to the cloud. But then why not just let the body and treasures be taken out, and the pyramid be reused? So...maybe it's encrypted! Like, it only works for Khufu, cus it's HIS special magic resurrection machine, an once he's uploaded, he's safe forever, but the bandwidth is a bit low, so he needs to be safe for a long time, but not forever, maybe. Or maybe all it really meant to him in private, was that he gets a huge monument that will show everyone he was badass, an make his name live on for a long time. But then I'dd expect the casing stones to have - at the very least - had a lengthy inscription about the size of his wiener, written all the way around the course closest to eye level. I dunno how many of the casing stones are accounted for an not butchered. A kid who bummed a cigarette off me told me that Muhammed Ali stole all the casing stones and used them to build the mosques in Cairo. If that's true, I can't imagine any inscriptions of any kind not being thouroughly erased before they even started to re-dress the stone.
So I think that's the real mystery of the Great Pyramid. Not the "how" but the "why".. For the other Giza pyramis, the "why" could just be, "Because Khufu". But Khufu went first, so he can't say that. And I'm sure by then he's seen that no tomb is safe from robbers. Maybe he had an assistant promising HIS tomb would be protected by powerful magical spells. Maybe he was just a pampered, dumb rich person. I kinda despise him for not leaving a diary.
@@ashscott6068 lmfao....there's a lot to think about here...like who hosted their cloud??? I mean surely it must have been AWS...They wouldn't have chosen google or microsoft...Clearly that must've been the case because, they are no fools.
it's not about hiring guards once and eventually they go home, it's about creating a monument that inspires awe, and through that inspires adherence to a temple cult, so that people keep coming, keep donating offereings, keep paying their respects, so that a priestly order can use that awe driven pull to run a cult, that endures. They hire guards because keeping the pyramid and it's temple complex secure protects their prestige and the mystery of the pyramid, once or twice a year they lift the portcullis for a ceremony inside the pharoah's chamber, but only the most generous donators from the highest stations who have proven themselves for years get that honor, and tales of their visit to the king's chamber and how impressive it was, and how close to the gods they felt keeps the common folks and aspiring nobles coming to the temple at the base of the pyramid on a regular basis
The pyramid was an investment, it was a spiritual amusment park infrastructure build out so that the cult of the pharoah would thrive for an eternity and keep watch over his treasures while they did it. @@ashscott6068
Pyramids were built with the stone blocks excavated to dig the Suez Canal.
Strange conclusion considering that navigating the interior would be incredibly difficult without the wooden staircases and lights installed in modernity.
How do we know a wooden staircase didn't exist? Something to speculate within the design of the grand gallery perhaps.
Sure, because wooden stairs would totally survive the 4500 years since the pyramid's construction. Also brave of you to assume that people who can build 100+ meters tall stone pyramids can't carry, I dunno TORCHES.
@@shotgunwound no evidence.
@@OnionChoppingNinja think that one through a little.
It's like I'm watching Columbo for Egypt. You brilliantly look at the same thing everyone else looks at and decipher it in a way that makes complete sense.
Thank you for thinking "outside the pyramid," err, "box." This series should be shown in every Egyptology, architecture and archeology course. Well done!
thinking "outside the pyramid," err, "box." Well said... I wish I had thought of that!
Not "outside the box" if he just agrees with other long dead, "archeologists" who made guesses based on false theory.
I've officially taken History for Granite.
I agree completely and now my world view has shifted, thank you.
wow! even the location of the sarcophagus is on the far back wall and not centered in the room because the center was for the visitors! Amazing theory you came up with! this is going to change things forever
Why wouldn't they just make lighter and smaller doors if they were meant to be used this often?
that doesn't sound very majestic.
Even as someone not that invested in archeology or pyramids, this definitely fulfilled the warning in the start of the video. It's an incredible theory and huge game changer.
What did I miss? It explains and reveals Nothing about the Mysteries of these pyramids.
@@_I__AM__GOD_ Riiiight.. Am.. Either you didn't pay any attention to virtually anything being said, nor explained. Or you're just too daft and uninterested to zoom out a bit and see the full picture. Those are the only two options that really comes to mind right now.
But perhaps you would be so kind, as to deliver us a third one? As your comment rings very hollow, and leaves anyone reading it quite clueless, as to how this "opinion" of yours, formed.
Ps. Also.. What mysteries are you more specifically referring to here?
You missed everything, fool. @@_I__AM__GOD_
@@Superknullisch So how were the 3 blocks that prevent entry to the ascending passage placed in entrance of the passage in the GP? And being placed, how did the visitors ascend? By the Grotto? The only solution I see that agrees with the theory in this video is that the 3 blocks were left waiting in the great gallery or in the queens chamber since the construction and after, at same point in history, someone could place them...
@@Superknullisch For starters, how come it's built on the speed of light longitude line
finally someone tells it like it is. I have always felt the grand gallery was built to be seen, not hidden.
If this is so, where is all the ornateness on the wall? I don't understand why that is missing
well there are 2 grand galleries if the big void is what we think it is.
@@jorny32 for the ornateness you need to go to the pyramid of Unas, all will be revealed.
He is wrong.
It was very smart. Done practical to build pyramid but also made grandiouse to that could see it.
I, like many others, stumbled upon your channel through a certain streamer and his passion for this subject, and your videos.
You are credit to the scientific community, and have regenerated a child-like interest in something so far from my life, that I haven't felt for ages.
Thnak you.
I have thoroughly enjoyed every one of your videos I have seen. I am not even much of a history or Egypt buff but your presentations have always been enthralling despite leaving me with only more questions. Your conclusions presented here are sound and deserve considerable respect. I would dare say nearly impossible to refute. Thank you for your study and videos, I look forward to more of your insight!!
Yes. Rational reasons. The best explanation I've seen yet. No aliens, no magnets, no razor blades. Just a tomb, with general reasons for the why. Maybe not exact reasons, but broad brush strokes. I like it. Thanks HfG.
I've watched each video you've made since you started. I've waited each one. This one is the best so far. Go ahead. Throw yourself out there. You're good at this.
He doesnt explain anything lol, Like how they got all those blocks there in the first place. WEAK Video.
Have you watched all of his videos? Some of them do speculate about construction methods. This one is more about "why" rather than "how".
@@Azarien just do a little search on the coordinates of the longitude (or is it latitude) location on Google earth. Check the speed of light.
Did you also know that Isaac Newton used the measurements from the pyramid to formulate the theory of gravity?
It was much more than a tomb. And this guy looks like a clown believing it was built in khufus reign
pyramids are around 200,000 yrs old.. proven to be factories.. no one was ever buried there.. after the ''gods'', left, they were re purposed.. if,,cough,, the egyptians built them, why now, with all that fantastic math, knowledge, do they live in tents & ride camels.. cos its all a bs story,,as is the fkn bible.. an engineer, studied, calculated all the amount of building materials needed, where they came from , transport, hawning, lifting, placing, plans needed. ect, ect, he calculated,, in 4.5k,, they would still, be being built.. &,, why the fk, would you build that, or all of them, just to bury a body.???.. its bs.. the pyramids, were cleaned,,of all evidence of previous use.. hawass, seen to that.. to keep there lie,,alive...
@@_I__AM__GOD_ that wasn't the intention here
I'm honestly not that interested in Egyptology, but this channel, with its "amateur nonsense," is quite fascinating. The information in this video is very compelling and makes sense. Archaeologists have often forced their own interpretations on the purpose of great monuments… sometimes they are wrong, sometimes not, but often, the answers are there if you ask common sense questions. EDIT: and I KNEW the pyramids were more than just landing spots for spaceships! 🙂
Quite the opposite. As scientists, archaeologists are constantly changing their ideas and hypotheses with new results. The "anti-establishment" drive of so many people is so tedious. Egyptologists devote their entire lives to meticulous and compare their work to others. The way to advance in a career is to make discoveries and innovations, and the all too common notion of just perpetuating old ideas to keep their jobs. You don't get a Ph.D., let alone research funding, unles you show something new supported by evidence
@@granthurlburt4062 yea but if you've already advanced your career, gotten a job and written multiple books on the "old ideas" then it is very much in your interest to perpetuate old ideas. Like Hawas and Lehner.
I would argue that instead of archaeologists constantly changing their ideas and hypothesis with new results, the archaeologists leading the pyramids' research just brush off new evidence and ignore old evidence, all to further their own hypothesis.
In this channel you will see his videos have a common theme:
1. Archaeologists brushing off old evidence from perring and other pioneers simply stating that they were incorrect with no further reasoning.
2. Brushing off new evidence from actual scientists for some reason or another
Examples:
- the account and drawings of a cover over the exit of the king's chamber's shaft (archaeologists just said it never existed)
- the scan pyramids big void (they just said that it didn't exists and was an error, despite the scan pyramids having sigma 5 certainty)
- or how Egyptology **STILL** claims that the bent pyramid was a engineering mistake, and that the bend was the result of a massive collapse despite the casing stones at the bend having the angle change carved into them.
A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. Ignoring evidence that obviously disproves your hypothesis is not behavior worthy of someone referred to as a scientist
Your last two videos have been amazing. I am just now getting to view them. I like how you keep things simple and not try to over guess, or guess at things that are no longer there. The great pyramid being more of a temple site for worship than just a burial site is an amazing idea. I like it.
Wow! I am in awe sir, what a magnificent piece of work.
I hope you see the recognition you deserve.
Outstanding!
Are you kidding me - dropping this out of nowhere like this? Very nice and consistent explanations!
This makes the most sense I've ever heard
That they were lifting up and down 4500 pound blocks daily instead of having a few loyal guards yeah I don’t think so
@@dustinholt7308 Not necessarily daily. Perhaps the pyramids were only made accessible on holidays or special occasions.
You'd think they would decorate the walls like most other tombs, especially one this grand.
@@dustinholt7308they put those things together, so maybe it was just a hobby when they were done. But no, they weren't moving them daily, was most likely just when they wanted to close shop like the video suggests.
o.k.. theres an obolisk.. in balbek, weighs 1,200 ton, it was abandoned 13k ago.because of the flood, & they left earth,, fact.... . so,, being in the ground, how, are they going to support it, cut it free, lift it, transport it, to where ever, then RAISE THE DAMN THING, . this vid is total bs.. humans never built the pyramids,,copied yes.. occupied yes, called there own yrs.. built,, big no..
I love how people who can’t even begin to explain how these pyramids were built will also claim that the builders were “stupid” 🤣🤣🤣 the nerve!
Amazing video and work. You’ve made history.
This gave me chills.
Absolutely brilliant! And I must say it is honestly thee single most common sense and useful way to keep the praise, remembrance and mourning for the Pharoah going long after he was gone.
crap.. they were factories, then re purposed.. if they were built by the egyptians,,why now,,dont they rule the world.. with there tech.. cos they didnt build them.. if these are rememberance,,then why dont they remeber how they built them, &, why are there diamond saw marks, core drill holes.. tons of polished granite.. go ask a stone mason,,any,, they all say,,its impossible, even with modern tech.. it would take more dirt / scaffold, to raise the blocks 400 ft, than the pyramids are built from, then,,remove it.. heres something to think of.. the natives at nan madol,, say, they didnt build it,, it was constructed by flying machines, with granite, basalt, from top of a volcano..look that up,,get some reality,,not fantasy.. kailash temple, hewn from top to bottom, out of a granite hill.. thousands of tons of rubble,, GONE..
and a useful way to achieve " immortality "
This makes so much sense, I've always thought there had to be better ways to close your pyramid than some really well-made super square granite block. If you really don't want anyone to come in you would plug up the entire passage or better still, destroy the passage so that it is maximumly difficult to dig through.
But instead they appear to be wasting a lot of time and effort making these super nice passages and doorways that's only supposed to be used once?
Ever since I discovered that there was a movable entrance door, it seemed that the pyramid was always meant for worshippers to visit. Like a museum, they needed guards and security. Once they fell out of use, the last priest probably set the blocking stones before leaving for good
That would mean that:
A) the builders somehow knew that there would be a "last priest" and the pyramid would go "out of use", in order to pre-load the plugging stones in the pyramid for an un-defined future eventuality that they couldn't possibly foresee or plan for (in fact, arguably they would have built the worship site for an eternity, it would be insulting to pre-plan for an eventuality when such an important worship site would go out of use)
And
B) that every single visitor entered the grand gallery only to immediately need to climb over several large granite plugs in the way
Those are good points. @@skuripandaburns3489
@@skuripandaburns3489Assuming that the north face chaimber above the entrance was the original entrance, it would continue in a level straight line directly to the bottom of the grand gallery above the blocking stones (and level with the passageways to the Queen's Chaimber) Visitors would have been using _that_ route and not ascending up from the descending passage.
@@skuripandaburns3489 The video speaks to a more pragmatic view though. tomb security by codifying it in Egyptian culture through awe and reverence. No different from the reason WE aren't going out and smashing up grave stones and tombs in OUR TIME. The idea that these sacred, enterable monuments wouldn't be plugged at some point, at fear of invasion or rebellion or other calamity is quite naiive.
@@skuripandaburns3489 Finally someone who's not a sycophant who can point out the obvious holes in this nonsense theory. Obviously the Egyptians would never have trust the 'last priest' to perform such a key fuction as actually plugging the pyrimid, such a person some hypothetical centuries into the future would certainly be more likely to LOOT rather then seal the pyrimid. The Pyrimid would have been plugged promptly after the burrial. Their is no way they would have allowed visitors in, that would have inevitably result in damage and theft of the grave goods.
You present a VERY strong thesis here. It makes SO much sense, with no "weird hoops" or ad hoc answers.
You have convinced me. Hope, your explanation becomes (at least a big part of) the officiel story told some day in the future. As with many other ground breaking thesises/theories there might be slight changes added later on, but you may very well have revealed the "Relativity theory" of the Great Pyramid.
It is up there with Einstein's work in giving straight forward, convincing, well backed up explanations to all observations.
GREAT WORK!
I started the video with my own thoughts and beliefs clouding my judgement. But as you explained all your theories it all started to make sense. A masterpiece of a video, and it’s changed my view on these great structures forever.
I always figured the Ancient Egyptians knew exactly what they were doing. Modern day people looking for their 15 mins of fame not so much. You bring up a compelling argument that in my mind has merit.
Is that why they all went in the pitch black dark pyramids without any light to see what they're building? Or later stealing(,apparently). They didn't because assuming they did this with primitive tools is nonsense. I like this guy's channel. But too many factors exist that they simply couldn't achieve
@@kenw2225 bold of you top assume their tools were primitives or that so were their ideas. these things were built at least 8 thousand years after gobekli tepe.
Let me guess, aliens?
brilliant. i have difficulty imagining the great pyramid not being a massive pilgrimage site, bringing people from far & wide to pay their respects.
Yes! people pilgrim there and then stop and look from the outside? no way! we go inside today and like he said, that's exactly what it's made for.
There is literally a giant temple directly in front of the Great Pyramid. The basalt floor and some columns are all that remains. Several pyramids still have their temples intact, directly in front of the pyramid's entrance.
they were chemical factories.. now bs tourist attractions with a plethera of bs lies being told.. ill bet you even think eclipses are a '' natural ''' occurance.. HAAAAH..
I've watched this three times now, partly because there's so much information to take in and partly because it's so well put together and interesting. Of all the channel's very good videos, I think this one is my favourite.
Bravo! While there are still unanswered questions for me, you have made it perfectly clear that the Pyramids were made to be entered and worked in over long periods of time. Well done.
your work has left me speechless! it's just incredible, everything ties together under your explanation and it makes so much more sense.
One of my first projects for school, as a young teen, was regarding the Great Pyramid and how it may have been built (back in the late 1970s). At the time, I had a great deal of trouble trying to decipher all the different theories (I was naïve enough to think there was an actual explanation) and ended up having to pick one from the encyclopedia and just one other book that agreed with it. Over the years, I've never lost interest, and have heard everything under the sun, since. The videos you present are the most eye-opening explanations I've ever seen, and make a lot of sense.
I'm completely sold on your explanation. It makes perfect sense that the tombs would be accessible. My mindset has always been that the intention was to seal them forever. Strange how easily we are all conditioned to think in a certain way. Thanks for all your uploads and your diligent research.
Ive been watching these pyramid schemes videos for years now and they keep getting better. History for Granite keeps taking us along for the ride.
I have no dog in this hunt... I don't care if you are right or not. I love your videos and I hope you solve all the mysteries. I have 4 observations and I know they may be just wrong because I am not an expert,. I have never seen the Pyramids for real. 1 ..... I would think you could remove the ropes, rollers or what ever operates the Ports ...there by sort of taking the keys. Without them operating the gates would be impossible unless you could make replacements... thus at least slowing robbers down. 2... I have lifted overhead weight this way and I'm sure it is still possible in the pyramid , to lift the gates with progressively longer wooden shafts by hammering them in once you leverage the gates high enough to get under them .. kind of wedging poles in place raising the gate as high as it could go. 3 ... If the the Egyptains built for human access, wouldn't the avenues of access be tall and big enough for comfort and traffic. .?? 4 ... The thing that bothers me most of all theories is.. after the death of Pharaoh, everyone had to crawl, stoop, and contort to get themselves ( and grave goods) into the chambers...This just doesn't sound dignified enough to me.... but I don't know of course.
Yeah I agree, the most obvious would be the lack of stairs in the Grand chamber, like how were they supposed to go through it?
Curious, Wasn't there many out side attempts to locate "the Hidden access", and if this was meant to be visited by the masses wouldn't there have been a grand accessible access made in the planning and the architecture design...example.. Ground level Ornate people sized access opening with stairs and light in a dark tunnel with no fire torches or soot on walls? Although credit due for your theory of an re accessible door( more plausible but for what reason... unknown) and Still no Evidence of a tomb BUT that of SOMETHING of immense value..
There's a significant error here 14:46 in the description of how to use levers: The assumption that levers can always only be moved down until they are horizonta.
If I had to solve this task using levers (and I'm no more than an average German engineer) I'd use a team with at least 2 levers utilizing several pivot blocks of various heights. This way the portcullis can be walked upwards all the way by alternating levers and pivot points. The far end of the levers can always travel the full height from ceiling to floor, making pretty quick work of the task at hand.
One other problem, however was not addressed here: weight of the portcullis and what material to make the levers of. I strongly assume that the tip of a wood lever might not have been strong enough to pry the portcullis up from the floor. Maybe this could be achieved by hammering wedges underneath? So, were the portcullis sitting on an entirely even floor?
Exactly. This guy has never used a hammer 🔨
I thought the same - carpenter here
Or were they ever lowered completely every time?
About wedges: Sliding a wedge between two stones seems contradictory, i would slide the wedge between two oily wood pieces, or animal hide, for it not to rub directly on the stone.
I had the exact same thought, there's no reason you couldn't use the full meter clearance for levering the blocks all the way up, recessing the bottom of the blocks into the floor would be a much better countermeasure.
But we know they had copper tools by the way, so they wouldn't necessarily rely only on wooden levers.
This kind of break some of the theory here, it must somehow be easier to use the ropes and pulleys to open the "doors" than to just use levers to make it worth the effort. As someone said in another comment maybe the granite plugs where used as counterweights to lift them making it decently fast and easy with the right tools (pulleys and ropes) and they where just not as concerned about people doing it without permission because they always had guards outside so no one could enter with such tools unnoticed? But if so why even bother with such big heavy "doors"?
@@77MIlesLong @TheMoneypresident Please don't get me wrong, I'm just pointing out what appears obvious to _me,_ that doesn't necessarily mean I'm right.
After all, those slabs of stone may have been meant to be movable, just as described by *HfG.*
I deeply respect the work done to present these findings and I appreciate the down-to-earth theories that don't try to explain everything with stars, aliens and esoteric mysticism.
Here's another thought why the portcullis were ultimately destroyed: I imagine they could easily get stuck and jammed by some debris falling into the recesses. If that was the case a lever simply wouldn't do the job anymore.
I really think you hit the nail on the head with this one. But it now makes me wonder. Assuming the pyramid and King's chamber were meant to be 'open' and visitable, where would the Pharao's vast amount of personal possessions be located? While paying hommage to the Pharao makes perfect sense, his treasures would still most likely be made fully inaccessable somewhere close to him.
Theory: Is it possible, that the newly discovered large void could first have been used to place the large ceiling vaults for the King's chamber, and then used to permanently and securely stash the Pharao's posessions? Maybe it's accessable through the north-faced corridor, which would explain why it is twice as tall/wide as the other corridors in the pyramid, to transport items that simply wouldn't fit through the corridors meant for people to visit the pharao. It would make sense for why the north faced corridor is seemingly rough and not meant to be seen, and maybe also why several layers of increasingly massive blocks were placed in front of it. It was a large entrance for items, but other than the rest of the pyramid, it was really meant to just be closed forever. Just an idea
This could also potentially explain why the newly discovered north-faced entrance/corridor is uncharacteristically horizontal, when almost all other entrances (even secondary ones) are usually angled downward, since the transportation of large items through this larger entrance would be made needlessly more difficult if the corridor started slanted down. Again, just an idea
Duuuyde you blew my mind 🤯 I had no idea
Edit: you deserve so much recognition. The right mind for the right subject, well done my friend 👏
To me, this is the obvious conclusion from your previous videos consideration of the air channels. The only problem I had with it was the granite at the bottom of the grand gallery, but now you have cleared that up for me too! I can't disagree with any of your conclusions. Fantastic work.
Perhaps the three granite blocking stones were in some way a counter-weight to facilitate lifting the portcullis stones?
Thanks for all that you do
♥
That's a cool idea. I was thinking maybe the "hidden room" above the gallery was used but counterweights are also a great idea.
That would be pretty smart. If the plugging blocks served as counterweight to lift the portcullis stones, then letting them go down the tunnel to plug it permanently would also make it much more difficult to lift the portcullis blocks afterwards.
The Granite stones at the bottom of the decending entrance were the Counterweight stones used as shown in Jean Pierre Houdin's theory.
The problem of the granite plugs inside the grand gallery remains: were visitors that ascended into the grand gallery expected to climb over the plugs?
@@skuripandaburns3489 Isn't the gallery wider then the hallway? In which case you can go around.
"The mental blocks ... were substantial." Glad you raised your personal portcullis!
UN. BE. LIEVABLE!! You're right: there is no going back now. How can I possibly hear ANY story about ancient Egypt without comparing it with the things you addressed in this video??? Well done!
Whoh!!!! That’s amazing man. Hus blows my mind! I just found your channel like two weeks ago and now you’ve solved a major mystery! Congratulations.
You have to do a fallow up video! Have you been contacted by tv or or anyone at the museums?? Let us know ok? So awesome! This is what’s great about UA-cam and the democratization of knowledge. Bravo!!
This is incredible. It’s been super satisfying to watch you reason all this out and bring it to a reasonable conclusion. Really just excellent work all around, man 🎉
Absolutely brilliant!!! I truly hope your work becomes widely recognized by mainstream Egyptology. The first time I watched a video of yours over a year ago I knew you had the kind of fresh eyes and open mind that was needed to crack these riddles of humanity.
Videos alone are not an accepted form of academic research.
Boi needs to present it in thesis form with all supporting sources.
Which I doubt he will do as more than likely he is just repeating views already held by others in the community, albeit obscurely to the average UA-cam viewer for which they would be brand new.
Not that I am saying he plagiarised someone else, but "mainstream Egyptology" as you call it encompasses a vast amount of paper research over a period of more than 2 centuries with thousands of individuals working on it that the average person could never get through in their lifetime without considerable help - and it's fairly likely that this subject has already been addressed at least once already.
Endless conjectures have been made, but contrary to your assumption this has only made the work more difficult. Sifting through endless fabrications and filtering out the false information was way more work than scrutinizing the physical evidence. Every solution looks easy in hindsight, but I assure you this was not.
There are many examples for cultures that visit their dead, even we do it today. Why not visit your god king, maybe even have a ritual for the transfer of power from one to another. I thought of this for years and I was really thrilled to see this video. Literally goosebumps. Thanks you for doing so much research. This video feels like the culmination of moste of the things you covered before. One thing that’s not really clear is the bottom chamber. I always wondered if this “unfinished” look had some meaningful symbolism to it that is yet to uncover.
@@mnomadvfx this is 2024. A good theory is a good theory. It doesn't need peer review. If it stands it stands. But he figured it out first.
@@mnomadvfx Your first sentence perfectly explains why nobody before him has figured this out.
Your second sentence shows that people like you are the functional equivalent of the blocking stones-you just sit there trying to block all who attempt to discover the truth with a massive amount of tan stuff.
And the first word of your second sentence gives me a pretty good idea of what you are, how you got to be that way, and how many people you enjoy hurting.
Flip it around-what do you know that might you contribute to helping him refine, prove, or disprove his theory?
A clearly presented explanation of why the Great Pyramid is what it is. It takes into account what physically remains there without inventing missing pieces. It’s also elegantly simple.
Man this is just phenomenal. What a fantastic piece of work!
As someone said during the premier stream: cathedral not tomb.
Its what pyramids have always looked like to me.
That's why funeral chamber is clean/got no hieroglyphs like Unas Pyramid. Has been used like a cathedral, same way we do it today just safeguarded and opened when needed !
First we had the original conventional explanations. Then the alternative unconventional "theories". Now, finally, something that makes sense. Thank you.
Your description of the Pyramids as a place regularly visited in ancient times, as they are today, makes a lot of sense . I immediately thought of the ancient crowds that visited the tomb of the genius Imhotep for centuries after his death. it seems logical that an individual who once lived on earth, then became a god, would be a more accessible deity than a god who had never been embodied on earth.
Thought-provoking research. You make a good case. Thank you for sharing the ideas and for working so hard on this video. Massive undertaking.
This video has truly left my mind reeling; it’s such a very satisfying proposition. (I’ve never been satisfied with the notion that the embossed split leaf, the round grooves of the western upper wainscoting and their functional implications within the antechamber portcullis were part of a one time use mechanism for closing up the Kings Chamber. Though I admit I had no thesis or argument for my doubts beyond my dissatisfaction that the complexity overwrought the purported function.) Still the video so rebukes the dogma I’ve read about with fascination since I was a child it’s hard to accept. I need to sit with it and mull it over a bit more I think.
I was enthralled. A well-constructed theory, founded in logic and solid research. And, compelling conclusion which follows Occam's Razor - all thoroughly satisfying my scientific brain. I applaud you.
I sent him an email a year ago with this theory. Sucks that he didnt at least mention that, or me. I have the email too. I can prove it.
A truly 'scientific brain' is never thoroughly satisfied or else we would still be believing that the fuzzy nebula observed by early astronomers were structures inside the Milky Way galaxy instead of one of the billions of Galaxies existing outside our own. Or the 'Luminiferous Ether" explained and proposed by Newton and James Clerk Maxwell but proved totally wrong. Science is full of countless examples of tremendous leaps of knowledge by truly 'scientific brains' that were never thoroughly satisfied by the status quo.
😃😃😃😃😃That being said, here's another thing not many people know. In a Perfect experiment with 2 different weights it can prove that heavier things fall faster then lighter ones. But you need God's own stopwatch and measuring tape to be able to see it. And only if the 2 different weights are dropped separately one at a time. If they are dropped together, the 2 objects fall at the exact same velocity reaching their destination at exactly the same time.
@@aeonsun No one cares bro.
@@aeonsun
Sending such material without posting it first on your own channel first to date it is the height of folly.
@@mnomadvfx i dont have a channel
Two ideas: I remember watching your video on the bend pyramid and asking myself, why is this men focusing so much on those portcullis, today I understood why. This hypothesis is the most rational and logic one I've watch since a very long time. Exactly, since I watch Jean Pierre Houdin's first documentary. His work make so much sense at the time and both your and his theories fits so well together and I'm sure about their complementary. He explained how they did it and you unveiled the philosophy behind those deeds. Thank you for enlightening us so well.
Your great passion for the topic is infectious. I was mildly interested in Pyramids and especially mummies as a child but apart from a few books I never dove deeper. However your presentation of the topic is very captivating and it won't be the last time I will watch this series.
I see this as a somewhat rare occasion where this sort of "amateur work" actually finds its mark. I'm reminded of Houdin's realization(s) as the closest comparison. I think you will be acknowledged for your observations and the model you've built from them. 'Pyramids as (open) temples' isn't a fresh idea, but I see your work as closing many, if not all, loopholes that have been (reasonably) used against it. Superb -- keep up the good work. I'd be writing a paper for submission if I were you.
Never thought I’d look at an archaeology video as a risky click 😂 totally worth it!!! Thanks so much for your amazing work and attention!
So much great info and ideas in this video, really it deserves a second watch to take it all in!
If the king's chamber was meant to be visited, is the lack of a pyramid text on the walls an issue?
Nice analysis and theory.
My only objection: It is entirely possible, and in fact likely, for people to be both incredibly clever and incredibly naive regarding security.
I've been analyzing, creating and breaking software security since the 1980s. Every day at work I deal with security problems in the software my company provides, some created by my teams and some from 3rd parties we incorporate into our solution. Once the problem is recognized, the reaction is always, "how could someone be so stupid!" Yet that has not stopped new problems from being introduced year after year.
How many times have you seen an exterior door on a building, houses are usually the worst, where the door has a nice lock, a solid deadbolt, and a reinforced strike? Now look to the sides of the door and how often do you see a window? Are there bars on the windows? And what is the wall made of? Typically the wall is a nice surface covering at most a 1/2in plywood sheathing (often cardboard or even just foamboard) with drywall inside. How long do you think it would take to cut a door-sized opening in that wall? Were they naive to fortify the front door?
"The goal is simply to be less wrong than what came before." One of the best lines I've heard in a VERY long time!
That being said, great video. Very insightful and thought provoking.
Great line!
Found this channel yesterday and just watched every video for two days. Brilliant analysis. Also it’s so nice to hear an American voice doing length measurement in metres and not adding feet and inches to placate the last three countries in the world still using imperial, but let the side down in this one by using pounds for weight instead of tonnes. Using pounds for weight is like measuring the distance from New York to london in inches, impossible to comprehend. Apart from that keep up the incredibly good work. 👏
This makes perfect sense! It was, and always will be a tourist attraction, and now, just like when the Pyramids were first built, the more you pay, the more you get to see! That’s a great payment incentive for the Priests to maintain the Pyramids in perpetuity. Cheers!
You've got to get this peer reviewed. Just put this in a word document, show your work in more detail and send it off, if only because it will ensure that some Egyptologists will see it.
I never believed that a pharaoh was laid to rest in the pyramid, but this explanation really seems grounded and logical. The kings chamber having triple portcullis protection with the only way of forced entry taking too long to go unnoticed. Walking up to the entrance of the grand gallery assuming no light sources were at the top, it would have seemed like an imposing endless void to any visitor.
@@UzMadBro What do you think a million human emerging during fertile growth with nothing else to do did? Foil hat people today would never make it a week back then let alone a life time. Sounds like the Ben and Jimmie ignorance show.
I strongly believe that the pyramid was not built as Pharaoh's final resting place. However, it's clear that the builders intended to secure something or someone inside it. The presentation was excellent, by the way.
@@UzMadBrowell i can move a 1 ton stone block by myself pretty easily so 200 people should be able to move a 100 ton block pretty easily.
@@UzMadBro Ah, foil hat time. I wonder what millions of people, pre-technology could have been doing for their entire life times as they further mastered food supplies? Maybe cutting a few million rocks? Yep. This stuff didn't happen like building a house next door.
@@PandorasFolly They did that with 1200+ tons block from a quarry that is 800km from Giza before cuting to perfect laser precision...
Ab- so- lute- ly FASCINATING!!! My mind is officially BLOWN!!!!
Effectively the same reasons why the grand cathedrals were built/ designed so majestically, so awe inspiring. One cannot help but be overwhelmed by the immensity of the structure thereby making one feel so small. How else should one feel entering a space of worship to a diety?
Bravo, old boy, BRAVO I say!!!!
This is the most logical explanation for everything about the pyramids' design. It takes into account that a group of people capable of constructing such technologically impressive feats, is intelligent, and has thought them through. This is schockingly uncommon.
Yes, this is the case. You've right: "only the living can protect the dead" ! It's clear that the tombs were known and as long as the cult of the deceased resisted they could be protected from intrusions. This also for the tombs in the valley of the kings. It even seems that the tombs of the 19th and 20th dynasties had wooden portals. The problem was that although the sites were protected by guards, we know very well from the papyrus what was happening and in the end everything had to be dismantled (also to recover the treasures for the benefit of the pharaohs of subsequent dynasties in truth). The cult was also carried out in funerary temples, but there was certainly also the possibility of entering the tombs to honor the deceased king on certain special occasions or just to inspect it.
Great job as always. Continue so, man.
Thank you
Luke
Also, I've watched this 3 times in a row and every time, I noticed another little nugget I missed before. That's good stuff, man. Good stuff.
This is by far the best pyramid channel, thanks Buddy
I love all your videos, especially this one. This does answer a lot of questions, and I'm curious to see how others react to this theory.
So the pyramids were always intended as working, useable buildings. It was always known they would be in use for a period of time before being internally plugged. This is very much in accordance with Jeremy Naydler's book, 'shamanic wisdom in the pyramid texts' which describes how the earliest pyramids were used for the secret rites of the Sed festival. To say that the pyramids were left open to be used for worship or to pay ones respects is to attribute modern attitudes to the past. Naydler's work uses the pyramid texts (which were recorded in later pyramids) to describe the secret rites that took place within these working buildings. I highly recommend this book.
I still have to wonder, why no hieroglyphics or artwork inside them? If it was a place meant for worship and revisiting, or rejoicing a once pharaoh.
the feeling of being in the middle of a MASSIVE pyramid was its power
@@user-pl4pz2xn2cStill, records were left on the walls of other structures that were of the dynastic period. It's inexplicable that these structures would have remained free of homage to the persons they were alleged to have honored. Something doesn't add up.
@@matthewwoelfle5533 Maybe the walls were lined with gold. We have no idea how exactly they decorated the walls
@@user-pl4pz2xn2c of course but nothing has been found. Not a single piece of decoration not a single drawing or a carving
Maybe similar to churches now, it was not their style to plaster the walls with writing at that time. And hieroglyph decoration got popular in later centuries.
thank you for such an amazing information. It feels like i am traveling through time in my room.
This video is incredible. I'm only a casual observer of Egyptian research, but this is the first theory I've ever heard that makes any real sense to me. This is my default interpretation until I see something better.
I find your hypothesis quite intriguing and note the evidence you provide in support. I’ve always been troubled by the possible theological issues behind Egyptian burials. It’s clear that there was a hope for an after life. The standard explanation of the pyramid is that it helps the pharaoh achieve rebirth in an afterlife. But what about the people? Not until the New Kingdom does the Book of the Dead show a broadening of theological possibilities from the ruler down to others. But your hypothesis suggests that there was a cult of the deceased pharaoh where people would continue to visit the pyramid and, most likely, make offerings. Here may be the final piece to the puzzle, by so doing they insure that they too would arise from the dead to an after life. So a mechanism for extending immortality to the average person and not just the pharaoh is here.
Now that's a good thought man. Perhaps the idea at the time was that if you curried favor with the pharoah, you might be extended his grace, through offerings/penance/tithing whatever they were doing?
Whew.
I’ve always agreed that the best explanation is the one that answers questions the best. This makes a lot of pieces fit. Bravo. Bravo.
Love your vids, I watch them all the time sometimes twice, just subscribed to you, keep up the great videos
Videos.
One of the most rational and compelling arguments I have heard of the available evidence. Very impressive. Thank you for your work and for not taking your audience... for granite. :)
Thank you very much. I think this video will always be my favorite.
Great video as always. You've been on a roll lately. I can still remember when you were the new kid on the block. But I'll push back a little on your conclusions. I think that the important observation you make here is that the portcullises were intended to be opened and closed on an ongoing basis, rather than a permanent seal to the chamber. (And this is, after all, the intent of most portcullises). This is actually very much in keeping with the impression that I have always had about pyramid architecture in general, namely that things seemed to have been designed to make it inconvenient to get around in them, but that they were nevertheless intended to be entered. After all, they even decorated some of the entrances. This isn't what you do if you're trying to seal something permanently. Similarly, many have speculated that the point of the robber's tunnel was that whatever object they were trying to remove was too large to fit through the Descending Passage.
Where I disagree is in the speculation about the overall purpose. I just don't buy the conventional wisdom of the pyramids having been constructed as burial chambers. And actually, I tend to think that the operational portcullises are evidence against rather than in favor of it. (Although they could be consistent with the King's Chamber being a family crypt, where you'd periodically open it to bring in another body). I don't know if there's any record of the Egyptians worshiping dead pharaohs up close and personal like this. I'd kind of expect them to consider that kind of proximity to be a sacrilege. Rather, they seemed to consistently seal and disguise tombs. The dead pharaoh was there all by himself with all of his stuff, isolated from the world.
The interesting question is what they might have been doing in the King's Chamber. The air shafts suggest that they'd be there for a while, and thus need fresh air. The portcullises that they could only be there during authorized times.
Brilliant stuff as always! Many thanks for sharing your hard work and years-long analysis. It all makes complete sense. One thought occurs to me however, if the Great Pyramid's burial chamber was designed to be accessible, perhaps any treasures buried with Khufu remain inside the pyramid, perhaps safely stored to this day in a deliberately inaccessible area designed and built that way during construction? The big void perhaps?
How many Americans believe that one day Washington DC will be a ruin, and the US a forgotten ancient civilization? Americans worried about this for a century or so. The older the country, the less likely it seems to the people that it will be transitory. Assuming that human beings are always human beings with the same brains and thought processes, and considering that Egypt was already ancient when the pyramids were built, it would not be a surprise to find that the Pharaohs and their people believed that Egypt would always exist. It still exists, and their one mistake was in not foreseeing the numerous changes in regimes, cultures and religions in their future.
You're still assuming it was accessible as a tomb and meant for Khufu. Consider this, Masonic ritual of resurrection from a simulated tomb. Consider that Osiris' story was resurrection. Consider it was meant to be limited accessible as an initiatory temple.
As you mentioned before, this is the one you will be remembered for. It is common wisdom that the most simple solution is often the correct one -> but especially in the field of egyptology, it rarely seems to be practiced that way.
Everything seems to obvious once you point it out. It's kind of hard to believe that it has taken this long to reach this conclusion.
Well done!
Thank you so much! The hardest part was always convincing myself. It's not easy to say that everyone else has been wrong for so long.
Wow, that was awesome!! Thanks for the hard work you've put into these videos
And that my friend is a MASTERPIECE of a video!
Good job!
I don't buy the ancient tourists angle, but priests doing rites inside the pyramid, next to their God King, that I'd believe, with plug blocks ready to seal off their god if an invasion should come (or if they had worn him out and replaced him with another one elsewhere). A very interesting video. Thank you.
Definitely possible that it was just a temple and only exclusive people were let inside. This seems very likely to me. But he's still right about the reentry of individuals rather than the one-time use.
Your video analyses are so great, down to earth and practical and respectful of the persons who planned and constructed these epic structures.
Great insight, fantastic episode.
Opens up the status quo to rethink everything, thanks for making this real.