@@DavySolaris did I imply somewhere that destiny is more knowledgeable about the conflict than loner? My comment can be boiled down to “look at destiny being supportive and happy for his friend that’s speaking truth and winning this debate” but just using different words. I don’t know what triggered you so bad in my original comment but try to relax with the strawmen bro.
@@papertroll1that’s some cope, like the original commenter was weirdly agro about destiny but lonerbox is inanely knowledgeable about history. His channel is mostly dedicated to history as well.
i've watched you research loner, you *know* there was aggression from zionist aligned parties before arms shipments in 1948. i didn't watch these two idiots "debate" so maybe i'm missing context for why you're saying that, or referring to those three months in late 1947. but this framing from you seems disingenuous, which i find very odd for you. what larger framing did i miss?
You admit you didn't watch it and then have a gall to make a comment here 😂 What a flaming hypocrite lol. Basically the zionists did not immediately attack after the partition plan was rejected. This guy said otherwise and he was wrong so have a seat !
Mostly right, but some IDF units before early 48 weren't under direct command, and some decentralised units behaved differently than others, for example, some Irgun units pushed into parts of the old city in 1947, and clashed with British forces there who were tasked with upkeeping the mandate. So it kind of depends what you mean by "zionist forces" because if you start in 48 after the formation of the IDF you're right, in the broader context I'd argue its more complex
Notice that they're talking about a very specific period "in november december... x happened", so extremely irrelevant comment. it's unfortunate that the year that is being talked about isn't mentioned in this clip though.
@@lonerboxliveBen Gurion did have a quote about the 1947 partition plan in his war journal. “Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.” - Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13)
This 5 hour debate was insane and he swooped in like fucking batman to smash some criminally bad disinformation
It’s Wonerbox with a steel chair!!!
I think it needs more sound effects
Bonerbox wins yet again
Wonerwox
Vineboomerbox
I need more boom from my box
Holy based
Destiny just thinking to himself “that’s my fcking boy!”
why would he be thinking that, lonerbox knows infinitely more about the history of the region than destiny, like it isn't even close
@@DavySolaris did I imply somewhere that destiny is more knowledgeable about the conflict than loner? My comment can be boiled down to “look at destiny being supportive and happy for his friend that’s speaking truth and winning this debate” but just using different words. I don’t know what triggered you so bad in my original comment but try to relax with the strawmen bro.
@@DavySolaris wtf r u talkin about Loner knows NOTHING about history, like it isnt even close!!!
@@DavySolaris Davy go to the bathroom, you're shitting yourself! GO. To the bathroom. You're shitting yourself
@@papertroll1that’s some cope, like the original commenter was weirdly agro about destiny but lonerbox is inanely knowledgeable about history. His channel is mostly dedicated to history as well.
Solid video 👌👌
vine BOOM
Based King 👑
Get the eye roll clip. That shit was fire.
Till the historian mentioned an attack in December, and the mofo went "the only one?"
Some might fight the cartoonish noises funny but not me; I find them orgasmic
Some people just enjoy the spicing 👌
i've watched you research loner, you *know* there was aggression from zionist aligned parties before arms shipments in 1948. i didn't watch these two idiots "debate" so maybe i'm missing context for why you're saying that, or referring to those three months in late 1947. but this framing from you seems disingenuous, which i find very odd for you. what larger framing did i miss?
You admit you didn't watch it and then have a gall to make a comment here 😂 What a flaming hypocrite lol. Basically the zionists did not immediately attack after the partition plan was rejected. This guy said otherwise and he was wrong so have a seat !
Classic BangerBox W
Mostly right, but some IDF units before early 48 weren't under direct command, and some decentralised units behaved differently than others, for example, some Irgun units pushed into parts of the old city in 1947, and clashed with British forces there who were tasked with upkeeping the mandate. So it kind of depends what you mean by "zionist forces" because if you start in 48 after the formation of the IDF you're right, in the broader context I'd argue its more complex
Not relevant at all but I’m proud of you for verbalizing your thoughts
Notice that they're talking about a very specific period "in november december... x happened", so extremely irrelevant comment. it's unfortunate that the year that is being talked about isn't mentioned in this clip though.
Lonerbox being based!!!
Huh?
The jewlumni appreciates your hard work. Checks in the mail.
Cooked
PEPE wins this message is brought to you by DggL
Thank you lonerbox and desteny
Is this a joke to you?
No, this is a video on a serious topic with less serious people, i mean person in it. Lets hope this channel makes more of them :)
credit goes to god tier shitposter, Spider, as seen on the reddit and can be found at: @LonerUnboxed
@@lonerboxlive🥸 KaBoom 💥? Yes Kaboom
@@lonerboxliveBen Gurion did have a quote about the 1947 partition plan in his war journal.
“Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.”
- Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13)