PNSO Triceratops Doyle Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лют 2019
  • PNSO Triceratops Doyle Review. This is the 1/35 scale model. This is a great model by pnso. I have a couple tiny gripes with it but overall it’s a great model.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @Mikelangelouss
    @Mikelangelouss 4 роки тому +4

    I love the pose of this Triceratops. It's very dynamic. 👌 The best Triceratops figure for now. 👍

  • @simonecappiello3937
    @simonecappiello3937 Місяць тому

    This Model is very good, Pose, Shape, Colour and Base in particular. A little skinny Neck for the Head.

  • @dynamosaurusimperious6341
    @dynamosaurusimperious6341 3 роки тому +1

    Just wanted to say this was a gud review

  • @LoneWolf-kn5hv
    @LoneWolf-kn5hv 5 років тому

    Nice review. Incredible how cheap the paint job is, compared to the prototype photographs. Possibly done very fast and cheap in some Chinese sweat shop by people who earn all too little money.

    • @DinoScreamReviews
      @DinoScreamReviews  5 років тому

      The earlier PNSO stuff the paint varied greatly from the prototype images. However there’s a version 2.0 out now of Doyle that more closely matches the prototype.

  • @bostonmeadhorn4897
    @bostonmeadhorn4897 5 років тому +3

    So when you gunna get a skeletor to ride it? I'd like to see that! And I'm not talking about Nancy Pelosi 😂

    • @DinoScreamReviews
      @DinoScreamReviews  5 років тому +2

      I maybe have a old skeletor buried somewhere. I have so much stuff scattered between my parents houses lol

  • @cosminbryant1243
    @cosminbryant1243 3 роки тому

    Haaa that is funny when you said once a while you have to hide from your wife 😃

  • @VazgShah79
    @VazgShah79 5 років тому +1

    Can this model stand without base?

    • @DinoScreamReviews
      @DinoScreamReviews  5 років тому +1

      It’s does. There’s just a peg for the back leg so it stays secure on the base. It’s stands perfectly fine off the base.

  • @thomasmonroe7947
    @thomasmonroe7947 3 роки тому

    So, it’s not a Barbie.
    I prefer as scientifically accurate a representation as possible.
    Having a figure with a fully visible cloaca is doing justice to accuracy just as much as muscle structure or visible bone structure.
    The paint job on your triceratops sucks.
    The sculpt is great.
    I especially love the overall girth of the figure giving it a very healthy animal look.
    The price, though, currently, is pretty much, a true buzz kill.
    I might spring for one if it doesn’t have that crappy honeycomb paint job.

  • @eduardofreitas8336
    @eduardofreitas8336 5 років тому +2

    The problem with the mouth is that it doesn't have cheeks :/ awesome figure otherwise.

    • @BionicleSaurus
      @BionicleSaurus 5 років тому +1

      Well, it technically does have them, they're just too thin and don't extend all the way to the beak. They look more like the thin cheeks of a Theropod.

  • @miertjestoer9525
    @miertjestoer9525 3 роки тому

    This one looks not that robust.