"Prosecutorial Tendency in Criminal Cases involving Conspiracy" | Justice N.Anand Venkatesh

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
  • Legal Empowerment Through Interaction - Lecture Series [#LETILS 87]
    #Shyam_Padman_Associates | Advocates & Legal Consultants
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    Topic: "Prosecutorial Tendency in Criminal Cases involving Conspiracy"
    Speaker- Hon'ble Thiru. Justice N.Anand Venkateshm, Judge, Madras High Court.
    Host: Sri.Shyam Padman, Advocate, High Court of Kerala.
    | Send your Queries and Suggestions at |
    letils.spa@gmail.com
    | Webinar @Zoom held on July 19, 2020, 03:30 PM India |
    | Contact Us |
    shyampadmanassociates@hotmail.com
    Music: Royalty.Free.Music.from.Bensound

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @faizaanqureshi7724
    @faizaanqureshi7724 Рік тому

    Finest lecture kn criminal conspiracy

  • @shekhartalashilkar7063
    @shekhartalashilkar7063 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent lecture And insight on subject of conspiracy. Thank you To.All of You Sir.

  • @vijayakumarpoovar8890
    @vijayakumarpoovar8890 3 роки тому +1

    Lordship is correct. It should be 50:50, the discussion on prosecution and defence. Victims are on both sides. But it is noted that the discussion is mainly on defense side.

  • @priyadarshijha5696
    @priyadarshijha5696 3 роки тому

    Superb exposition of law by Justice Venkatesh. Indebted to him

  • @agp54
    @agp54 4 роки тому

    Dedicated lecture on selective portion. Highly appreciated

  • @NarenderKumar-xx7ec
    @NarenderKumar-xx7ec 3 роки тому

    A real issue dealt with authority that prosecution must be involved actively and not as a post office.

  • @dipakkhambhati8875
    @dipakkhambhati8875 4 роки тому

    please share notes with as, because it is very much helpful for all the participate..

  • @ramneeksingh4384
    @ramneeksingh4384 4 роки тому

    Very informative session 16.9.20

  • @ROHITGUPTA-ec8bs
    @ROHITGUPTA-ec8bs 4 роки тому

    This actually punishment for agreement which is actually preparation in criminal jurisprudence

  • @user-dl1rn4te5c
    @user-dl1rn4te5c 4 роки тому

    The first ( illustration) case is peehaps wrongly decided . What other hypothesis can be inferred but for committing forgery or fraud by tendering fictitious bills? Giving your bills memos to any person who is not your agent, signifies nothing else but agreeing to another for some illegal purpose, or for legal purpose by illegal means. I believe criminal conspiracy against both the accused persons get established, beyond reasonable doubt and not merely ends on a reason to believe.