Відео

Thanks

very useful❤

Vinit ji mathur ke num send kro sir h to

I am a victim of medical negligence in administering dopamine during surgery to my husband. Because the whole medical system is not uniform united and doesn't treat the patient as a whole. An orthopaedic only treats bones he is not concerned if the patient has hyper thyroid or cardiac problem. He does the surgery and the dependent signs an agreement that neither the doctor nor the hospital is responsible in case of death during surgery

The term negligence is a twister

it is the result of criminal negligence which makes a difference between negligence by doctors and other professionals . if an electrician commits a small mistake resulting in an a ceiling fan getting damaged , it is just loss of money . but if his negligence causes a major accident resulting in loss of life , prudent man wiĺl view it as criminal negligence

Doctors cannot become butchers.

Can 'dopamine' be administered to a patient before conducting surgical operation instead of administering anesthesia?

No doctor come forward give 2nd oppion on medical negligence

👍👍👍🎉🎉🎉🎉

I watched your every lecture. It's very helpful for everyone. So, thank you very much. Please, continue your lecture ,when you get time.

Thamks

Thanks a lot ❤

🎉😊😊

🎉🎉🎉🎉

Justice Nagamuthu is great

can new evidence be relied upon in the disagreement note by the disciplinary authority after completion of inquiry proceedings which was not adduced during io/po stage? the new evidence was never part and parcel of the charge sheet. you are requested to provide your valuable opinion citing rule and the supreme court order that whether the disciplinary authority can use new evidence after conclusion of io’s report.

Very useful Thank you Justice PNP

WOW...I am proud to be your friend...❤

Much thanks sir for clearing the minute hidden confusions

Shyam, namaskar. I am from Odisha and have a problem like this in an FIR one has been accused and after registration elapsing 24 hours can pray bail surrendering before SDJM?

Disciplinary acted as enq officer and imposed punshment. Will it stand before law. Pl clarify

Brilliant concept. So grateful to Shyam Padman ji for organising such a wonderful session. Loved it being an Advocate and Music learner too..

Sir can I get the article of Honourable judge they mentioned in this video

Absolutely brilliant lecture and articulation sir.

Top class lecture by madam. As always Prem sir the king of citations unmatched by ability to recollect any judgement in the Indian judicial history. This phenomenonal memory is only surpassed by one and only legendary justice R F Nariman sir.

3 nahi hai 30000

Brilliant articulation opening countless doors to diverse legal facets vis-a-vis gender laws...

Vishal gogne sir is like a idle for me ......

Sir rikvayar by low hai to 45 ka kya prabhav rahega

In my humble opinion the Hon'ble High courts in exercise it's powers vested must prescribe timelines for completion of pleadings, framing of issues, completion of trial and arguments in order to achieve the object of Constitutional as well as RP Act on election disputes. 🙏

Well explained. Intelligible even for a layman.

ഈ ന്യായധിപന്റെ ബെഞ്ചിൽ എനിക്ക് ഒരു കേസുണ്ട് വളരെ നാളായിട്ട് തീർപ്പാകാതെ കിടക്കുന്നു ദയവായി തീർപ്പാക്കുവാൻ അപേക്ഷിക്കുന്നു ദൈവം ധാരാളമായി സാറിനെ അനുഗ്രഹിക്കേണ്ടതിന് പ്രാത്ഥിക്കുന്നു

Top quality discussion by the panel. I always listen to multiple discussions on the same subject because you get different perspective and insight. Prem sir is a model for any young lawyer due to his mastery over citing of judgements which I have not seen from anyone else in this profession. Justice ramkumar, nagamuthu always at the their best.

197 crpc is a bad law, police atrocities victims will not get justice

Shyam sir please arrange for a lecture by Prem sir on the topic the art of citing and remembering case laws and judgements. It would be very helpful to all young lawyers.

Very interesting presentation

Excellent

Top class lecture Prem sir. I still regard you as the master of citations in Indian legal circle. Just like legendary Justice R F Nariman who has a phenomenal and elephantine memory who can recall and speak on any topic on the earth in the same way there is no case law or judgement probably Prem sir is not aware of. Such is the standard set by him. Appreciate your articulation on this landmark judgement and look forward to more such lectures on important subjects in future.

Useful lecture series for preparing judicial service exams....🎉Thanks a lot for knowledge sharing

Amazing and holistic enlightment on the topic ! Thanq sir 🎉

"Lordship" is more annoying than "honourable ". I don't know when will these highly pricing, decorating, worshipping words will disappear from courts

Sir, pl thro light,If boundaries in erroneous in registered sale, but seller & purchaser made corrections while suit is subjudice,then can the corrected subsequent sale deed is admissible?

SIR, PLEASE EXPLAIN REAL QUESTION INVOLVED IN THE AMMENDMENT. Provided that in a prosecution for an offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code or for attempt to commit any such offence, where the question of consent is an issue, it shall not be permissible to adduce evidence or to put questions in the cross-examination of the victim as to the general immoral character, OR PREVIOUS SEXUAL EXPERIENCE , of such victim with any person for proving such consent or the quality of consent. SECTION 146 EVIDENCE ACT

Wonderful lecture and contribution by experts.

Thanks a lot for this webinar. DR. . SUNDARESAN🎉HYDERABAD

Happy teacher’s day, respected sir. Have learnt a lot from you🙏🏻

good lecture

Goodsir : Nabeel sir my neighbour in changanacherry

very informative and insightful talk that is very relevant in the present India. This is an eye opener for me in several angles of Constitutionalism. We rarely do have such young lawyers with such clarity.