5 Personal Airplanes You Can Buy For Less Than $30,000

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • Become a MojoGrip MVP mojogrip.net/mvp
    Subscribe for MORE: goo.gl/1VMCk5
    When we think of airplane ownership, specifically small single engine piston engine airplanes. The general consensus is that owning an airplane is only reserved for the rich. Well I hate to break to ya. Actually just about anyone with a job can afford to own an airplane. If you can afford a brand new honda accord, chances are you can afford to own a single engine airplane.
    Four of the airplanes shared in this video are certified, cessna, piper and grumman and one is an experimental build, the sonex. Outside of the amateur build sone, consider these airplanes old and rugged. They are rugged and very reliable aircrafts. The fact that they’ve already made it through several decades and still flyable is amazing.
    Here are the 5 airplanes listed
    Cessna 150: The cessna 150 is what you consider your modern day light sport aircraft. Except the model is about 50 years old. And unlike modern light airplanes, cessna 150s are fully certified aircrafts. Both for VFR and IFR flying if fully equipped. The best thing about this airplane is the low entry cost and low cost of maintenance. Also the cessna 150 is one of the most forgiving airplanes in General aviation. Very reliable and slow to fly. Great airplane to learn and build some time for new pilots.
    Range: 300 Nautical Miles
    Cruise speed: 103 knots
    Useful load: 303 pounds
    Fuel consumption: 5 gallons per hour
    Avg Used Price: $20,000
    Cessna 172: When you think of the godfather of general aviation aircrafts, think of the cessna 172. One of the oldest modeled airplane still being produced in the US today. The 172 have certainly earned it’s stripes in aviation over that last few decades. A great reliable and safe airplane, but with more speed, range and better useful load than the cessna 150. Cessna 172 remains one of the most utilized training aircraft till today.
    Range: 435 Nautical Miles
    Cruise speed: 115 knots
    Useful load: 930 pounds
    Fuel consumption: 8 gallons per hour
    Avg Used Price: $29,000
    Piper Cherokee 140: A superb low wing airplane that was first introduced in the 1960s. Back then this was considered a very sporty airplane, still is. But what sets the piper cherokee apart is it’s great handling and forgiving characteristics, and many pilots have said this is one of the easiest aircrafts to land. The piper cherokee comes in multiple variations/models. You have the 140, 160, 180 and 235, all with different size engines and performance differences. This airplane is also one of the few early birds that is still used to train new pilots in todays age.
    Range: 455 Nautical Miles
    Cruise speed: 110 knots
    Useful load: 900 pounds
    Fuel consumption: 8 gallons per hour
    Avg Used Price: $25,000
    Grumman American AA1A: The Grumman is a vintage aircraft still flying today. The best thing about the Grumman is not only it’s handling characteristics but the price. A used Grumman can be bought in today’s market for as little as $16,000. The late 60s models with a nice six pack avionics panel. Low purchase price also translate into low maintenance cost for this airplane. It uses a similar lycoming engine as the cessna 150, thus share some of the same performance. Except the grumman has much better useful load at 1007 pounds.
    Range: 350 Nautical Miles
    Cruise speed: 109 knots
    Useful load: 1007 pounds
    Fuel consumption: 6 gallons per hour
    Avg Used Price: $18,000
    Sonex Waiex: Sonex aircraft is an amateur built airplane kit manufacturer. One of the many based in the US. They provide kits for several airplane models, which include a one seater (sonex onex) and a personal jet (subsonex). Amazing right? building your own personal single engine jet for only $100,000. The model displayed in this video is the Sonex Waiex-B model. Great little airplane that sits two comfortably and travels at speeds north of 130 miles per hour.
    Range: 500 Nautical Miles
    Cruise speed: 113 knots
    Useful load: 480 pounds
    Fuel consumption: 4 gallons per hour
    Avg Used Price: $24,000
    Music provided by bensound.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @mojogrip
    @mojogrip  6 років тому +254

    $40,000 HomeBuilt Airplane ua-cam.com/video/K9PuYZYxk0Y/v-deo.html

    • @rsar61
      @rsar61 5 років тому +4

      Could you do a video like this on helicopters

    • @mattolmstead6150
      @mattolmstead6150 5 років тому +1

      @dany mustang 2 homebuilt. But you dont want to fly more than 4 hours at a time without stopping it gets a little rough.

    • @mattivirta
      @mattivirta 4 роки тому +1

      40K home build no newer max need be 10-20K only if need build in home too. ready to use can buy 40 000

    • @TheDrakulie
      @TheDrakulie 4 роки тому

      how does this handle in severe thunderstorm ?

    • @mattolmstead6150
      @mattolmstead6150 4 роки тому

      @@TheDrakulie just like any plane you will avoid any Cumulonimbus clouds and convective activity

  • @Citizen-of-theworld
    @Citizen-of-theworld 5 років тому +3236

    This video flows better at 1.25x speed. Give it a try.

    • @OverKilL413
      @OverKilL413 5 років тому +178

      You are right thats normal 😂

    • @ltphilipg
      @ltphilipg 5 років тому +43

      More like 2x lol

    • @cyrix165
      @cyrix165 5 років тому +13

      But then he is high pitched

    • @_sp00kyb0i_
      @_sp00kyb0i_ 5 років тому +72

      At .75x he sounds like hes drunk or on sedatives lol

    • @backcant7757
      @backcant7757 5 років тому +2

      Jonathan Ball yeah

  • @DavidLGood
    @DavidLGood 6 років тому +1388

    Wow. A Top 5 video that isn't click bait or stolen advertisements compiled together. A legitimate Top 5 video that actually delivers great content and has reasoning behind the list. This is what Top 5 videos should be like. THANK YOU!

    • @cobytheq1718
      @cobytheq1718 6 років тому +8

      Your so right dude😂👍🏻

    • @fish8450
      @fish8450 5 років тому +5

      172 likes, ironic :)

    • @nffctv184
      @nffctv184 5 років тому +10

      I was a bit disappointed that the Antonov 225 was not on there

    • @srinivasans5429
      @srinivasans5429 5 років тому +2

      Joseph G 123 YT hahahahah

    • @ansterling522
      @ansterling522 5 років тому

      I just saw this comment has 666 likes

  • @Saad-bz2hx
    @Saad-bz2hx 5 років тому +398

    I’m 16, waiting to be 17 and literally counting everyday just so i could apply for my PPL. I been saving up for 4 years now and i just want to achieve my dream, as much as people make fun of my dreams and call it “ out of reach “ i still believe in myself, stay positive people and pray for me hehe :P
    UPDATE: i'm 18 now, i got my PPL almost 3 weeks ago, me and a friend bought a Cessna 152 and we are having ALOT of fun every time we fly over the city, there's something magical about it and every time we take off there's a feeling i can't even describe.. i want to tell anyone reading this, please don't ever give up.. time will take care of things as long as you're working for them.
    thank you guys for your prayers.

    • @Luna-im2sf
      @Luna-im2sf 5 років тому +5

      GL!

    • @Gringo_Lingo
      @Gringo_Lingo 5 років тому +10

      That’s good you’re focused at your age! Back when I was 17 my dreams were convoluted, and I wish I would have buckled down and focused on aviation while I had scholarships. Now is the best time to pursue aviation!

    • @atomictrash2784
      @atomictrash2784 5 років тому +6

      So, have you got it yet?

    • @4franz4
      @4franz4 5 років тому +4

      @@atomictrash2784 good question

    • @captain2294
      @captain2294 4 роки тому +2

      Pilot-respect

  • @Bodhidata
    @Bodhidata 6 років тому +1300

    I bought a C150 for under $20K. My first annual? $450 owner assist. My insurance? $475/yr. Tiedown? $75/mo. Gas? 5 gal/hr. So while you narrow minded naysayers are attempting to show how much you know about why these planes won't work I'm actually doing it and having the time of my life flying over you while you wallow in negativity. C ya! Wouldn't want to be ya!

    • @LordDice1
      @LordDice1 6 років тому +7

      Eric Woods Tyson thank you☺

    • @magic3400
      @magic3400 6 років тому +4

      Eric Woods Tyson thank you☺

    • @Bodhidata
      @Bodhidata 6 років тому +26

      My insurance allows me to charge up to 4 named pilots at no extra charge. Also when you leaseback to my flight school we pay the $350/mo insurance, tiedown, 100 hour inspections and give you $500/month on a Cherokee 140.

    • @BattleshipMan_
      @BattleshipMan_ 6 років тому +1

      Eric Woods where did you buy the 150?

    • @SKRUBL0RD
      @SKRUBL0RD 6 років тому +11

      5 gallons an hour is still around $25 an hour and you can go what, 130 mph and your max range is what 400 miles? A car may be half as slow but it's far cheaper and far safer and you don't need special permissions every time you want to leave and arrive.

  • @Adam-de8jm
    @Adam-de8jm 6 років тому +781

    The Cessna 150 is lierally the ford ranger of the sky.

    • @AviationJeremy
      @AviationJeremy 6 років тому +94

      Well built, light, easy to use and maintain, a solid engine, lasts forever, and discontinued by the manufacturer but still going strong... you aren't far off!

    • @mwh82108
      @mwh82108 6 років тому +10

      mango ford rangers suck! they wont pull jetski. fix or repair daily ford!

    • @blackdeath4eternity
      @blackdeath4eternity 6 років тому +26

      i didn't think you had to pull the fenders off a Cessna to change spark plugs?...

    • @ok-hd4so
      @ok-hd4so 6 років тому +14

      i used to tow a 16 foot fiberglass bass boat with a ranger

    • @russwilson2305
      @russwilson2305 5 років тому

      A Ford Ranger steers like a pig.

  • @craigresponds2504
    @craigresponds2504 6 років тому +243

    Anything made in the 70's will have maint costs. It's part of the fun. Think positive, be happy, live life. I was made in the '60's and I have maint. costs too!!

    • @randyfarris2645
      @randyfarris2645 5 років тому

      craig responds a

    • @alfonsom8286
      @alfonsom8286 5 років тому +5

      @john wayne gacey , lmao

    • @videorowtv5198
      @videorowtv5198 4 роки тому +1

      Ok boomer

    • @cw93711
      @cw93711 4 роки тому

      Aircraft have annuals on maintenance each year so they are in pretty good shape. Plus he left off on on any aircraft you buy you have a certified aircraft mechanic power plant and airframe go over the entire aircraft and then a commercial pilot certified in that model of plane fly it to make sure their are no issues. Yes it's 1000 to 2000 dollars depending on where the plane is but better then buying a hunk of noon flying junk

    • @lyleswan6671
      @lyleswan6671 3 роки тому

      amen brother!!

  • @bruceruttan60
    @bruceruttan60 6 років тому +71

    This is a well done presentation. Well written, very good camera work and the speaker does a fine job. The information is accurate and thoughtful and overall, it's close to a five, out of five.

  • @madlyawww
    @madlyawww 6 років тому +360

    Just go to your local airport...... A lot of airports sell used aircraft. At my local airport there is a 152 for 11,000.

    • @carlosdanger4648
      @carlosdanger4648 6 років тому +16

      No Name I live right by the airport when I drive by the airport I see planes at the airport, sometimes the airport airplanes are for sale at the airport

    • @click2viewnow
      @click2viewnow 6 років тому +2

      what airport

    • @yougotpassedbyagirl
      @yougotpassedbyagirl 6 років тому

      wow that's awesome

    • @johnwighton
      @johnwighton 6 років тому +19

      Yes that is possible. But it will be on condition (engine over 2000 hrs) and probably need avionics or other work. Think $20k as a min for a decent type approves aircraft.

    • @AlphaGolf1
      @AlphaGolf1 6 років тому +11

      No Name that 152 is probably an unairworthy death trap.

  • @doranjaffas9645
    @doranjaffas9645 6 років тому +234

    There are many viable aircraft out there for an average man or woman to afford IF they really want to. These include factory as well as homebuilt aircraft. For the sake of perspective I will define 'average" by my standards..$35,000.00 -$50,000.00.
    Flying does not have to be expensive but it take money and priority. It is not like so many " hobbies" that you can set aside and the expense goes away.
    Entry level license will take from $ 4K to 10K. This can be paid over time throughout training.This is a basic license. Add endorsements and rating and up you go expense wise all the way around in the form of staying current.
    A basic but good airplane can be had for the previously mentioned prices and go waaay up to infinity but again we are talking about average income pilots doing thus for personnel reasons..not commercial.
    If you have an airplane...metal or fabric covered...hangar it. A lot of folks tie down outside but over a much shorter period of time wear results and that cost more than hangar rent in the long run.
    Also..amature built does not necessarily mean less expensive in any form though if you are familiar with how an airplane is built or are willing to learn..their cost can be offset to varying degrees.
    ALL aircraft require maintenance..no exceptions.
    Let's do a break down of sorts.
    Aircraft .. $22,000.00
    Hangar....$100.00 to $300.00 per month.
    Fuel....... $3.00 to $6.00 per gallon...5 to 10 gph fuel burn.
    Oil...$3.00 to $8.00 per quart
    General maintenance on tires..brakes..engine...airfeame can be from $15.09 per hour to over $50.09 per hour depending on different factors such as engine manufacturer..time on engine and airframe..care from previous owners etc. These figures include fixed expenses for yearly aircraft inspections.
    Flight review every 2 years.. $209.00 to $500.00 ( high side).
    These are basic rounded figures and that being said..will scare a lot of people...Now..to justify them...sort of.
    If you want to fly...how passionate are you?
    Instead of a moderately priced car...there is your airplane...instead of smoking and Friday nights..there is your hangar and maintenance....instead of eating out everyday for work...pack a lunch and snacks ..there is your flight time.
    If you have other hobbies that you don't want to give up to fly then you have made your decision and that is good for you. If you have some interests that you are willing to cut back on it trade for your desire to fly...then you might just find a whole new world of perspective of family and friends that share your passion and will change your life and experiences forever.
    Welcome to the clouds, flyin breakfasts, new horizons, sunsets and sunrises. WELCOME TO FLYING.

    • @kalmian
      @kalmian 6 років тому +8

      Doran Jaffas Well said Sir! Well said.

    • @doranjaffas9645
      @doranjaffas9645 6 років тому +8

      Kal Mian Forgot I wrote that. Thanks. The 09 was supposed to be 00. type error but again.. thanks.
      I flew my Cygnet SF2A this past Sunday. First flight since December here in Michigan. Still can't get the grin off my face😀😀😀

    • @carloko08
      @carloko08 6 років тому +3

      waaaa, dude, you convinced me, I will buy my plane in the future, but its engine will be electric, I do not want fuel or oil or dammed maintenance crap in my plane

    • @ninthcloud6331
      @ninthcloud6331 6 років тому +3

      Wow my guy. I'm 28 and this is a goal for me by 35. Holy carp! This comment truly inspires me. I don't have a license yet but your few words really put this in perspective for me and the sky ahead. I appreciate it. And I'm excited to begin discovering the great blue yander!

    • @steved.1698
      @steved.1698 5 років тому

      Thank you. Now I certainly will buy a plane!

  • @1aday2008
    @1aday2008 6 років тому +72

    Nice video. I have a C150 and upgraded it to be IFR because of Northern California weather. After owning it for 18 years, I am considering selling due to health. It was nice to see your video and makes me wish for my younger days.

    • @appleanthony
      @appleanthony 6 років тому +1

      P and S how much were you thinking about selling it for? A few of my buddies were thinking about buying a C150 for flight training and time building.

    • @1aday2008
      @1aday2008 6 років тому +2

      Its worth about 26k. Has about 100hrs SMOH. Full IFR. I would like to get 20k. I have invested over 30k in avionics and engine overhaul. prosharealty at gmail com

    • @1aday2008
      @1aday2008 6 років тому

      anime equals douchebag. Email is in above post. We will consider. As the video shows these are great planes.

    • @lawrencehenson8494
      @lawrencehenson8494 3 роки тому +1

      @@1aday2008 still have it? lehenson@msn com

  • @damianketcham
    @damianketcham 4 роки тому +51

    Cessna 150/152: taking bird strikes in the rear since the 1950s.

    • @isaacfeinberg4623
      @isaacfeinberg4623 3 роки тому +7

      Lol

    • @wojciechmuras553
      @wojciechmuras553 3 роки тому +3

      What? Elaborate please.
      EDIT: Oooh, nevermind! lol

    • @lyleswan6671
      @lyleswan6671 3 роки тому +5

      I literally flew one backwards C-150 8355U(ground speed anyway)during private pilot check ride in 95. Really windy day 25 knots gusting to 35 straight down runway that day. Examiner gave me headings and altitudes during foggle or instrument part of practical exam, and said "ok look outside now" I looked at ground and we were flying backwards(in relationship to ground speed). It was pretty freaking cool!

  • @JWH-01
    @JWH-01 6 років тому +57

    I owned a Cessna 172 for a number of years. It was a blast! I flew it to 14 states. The 172 is easy to fly and is the cheapest way to stay in the air. The fixed gear and fixed prop lowers the maintenance and insurance cost. As others have commented on, yes there are maintenance costs. You can dramatically reduce this cost if you are willing to get your hands dirty. Find a mechanic that does free lance work instead of going to the FBO for your annual inspections. There are plenty of mechanics doing work on the side for extra cash. Do as much maintenance yourself as the FAA allows. It is cheaper and you learn a lot about how the plane is built. This makes you a safer pilot. I fail to understand why fewer people are learning to fly each year. It is much more relaxing and fun to fly your own plane than to drive the interstates or fly commercial.

    • @deweyunknown3745
      @deweyunknown3745 6 років тому +6

      John Hempel I would think some of it is the economy the past several years and maybe the millennial factor similar to what’s happening in the motorcycling world. Also stats says large portion of millennials aren’t interested in even getting a drivers license!

    • @nathanmurray2891
      @nathanmurray2891 5 років тому +3

      Could the average person be able to afford a 172?

    • @jhill6033
      @jhill6033 5 років тому +1

      This is a brand new world for me, how much was your insurance?

    • @ryansraven
      @ryansraven 5 років тому +5

      Barely afford rent these days, no good jobs anymore. I had to sell my motorcycle because I couldn’t afford the insurance anymore. Don’t know if it’s cheaper down in the States or not. But in Ontario, Canada it’s getting to hard.

    • @toadman506
      @toadman506 5 років тому +3

      Oh yeah, Do your own Oil Changes, get an A/P that will let you do basics, and sign off on it, and for an annual, do all of the Prep work yourself so all the A/P has to do is come in and do the inspection and you save a boatload of money.

  • @keegansponholz9260
    @keegansponholz9260 6 років тому +79

    Heck Yes! Can't go wrong with a 150/152. I did all of my private training in a 1976 152 and I fell in love with it. Great little airplanes.

    • @747-pilot
      @747-pilot 6 років тому +5

      Yes, I will gladly second that!!! Did my training in a 1978 152. In some ways, I like it more than the school's 4 172s. They have a 2006 172SP, which I've flown a few times with an instructor, and it feels like I'm getting into a Rolls Royce with expensive leather, after having flown the 152! 😃 .....but still the lighter, "crisper" 152 feels like more "fun" and "nimble" to fly!

    • @DFX2KX
      @DFX2KX 6 років тому

      The only aircraft I ever got to actually fly (Young Eagles back in the day) was a 150. You can be pretty short and still see over the instrument panel, which is nice! (alas, the eyes are junk, so I can't get a PPL)

  • @chanceg1218
    @chanceg1218 5 років тому +14

    as an A&P student / Assistant, the 150(2) is crazy easy to do Annuals on.

    • @7478captain
      @7478captain 4 роки тому

      How about the 172?? Just as easy, or at least close??

  • @lunarsolis8109
    @lunarsolis8109 4 роки тому +17

    I’ve been playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 and now I want a Cessna 172

  • @Hobberhawk
    @Hobberhawk 6 років тому +186

    I actually just bought the exact Warrior in the video. N1776J

    • @0justLook
      @0justLook 6 років тому +7

      so how was the video's estimate of cost? Please share with us. Along with unexpected costs?

    • @Hobberhawk
      @Hobberhawk 6 років тому +25

      0justLook $21,500 for the plane. $8,700 for the IFR radio upgrades.

    • @mothman-jz8ug
      @mothman-jz8ug 6 років тому +27

      Congrats on getting your own plane, and I wish you many years of safe flying. (I hope you were not in the majority of trolls..Oops, I meant "commenters"... who think the video title said "Airplanes you can buy, maintain, overhaul, insure, and keep fuel in for life under $30,000".)

    • @Hobberhawk
      @Hobberhawk 6 років тому +4

      Sassy The Sasquatch the little low wing. White with redish orange striping on the body and winga

    • @Slippindisc
      @Slippindisc 6 років тому +8

      Brendan Hobson cool tail number. ‘Murica

  • @pilotandy_com
    @pilotandy_com 6 років тому +166

    I got my Warrior for 20k. Sure there are maintenance costs, but I got it for under 30k. And it is SO FUN to fly!

    • @davidakshay7602
      @davidakshay7602 6 років тому +1

      Andrew Craner is that easy to ride ?? how to get liscence for that bro?

    • @gregorysvitavsky6505
      @gregorysvitavsky6505 6 років тому

      I'm a welder and thinking about building an airplane... Idk what I'm getting myself into

    • @pilotandy_com
      @pilotandy_com 6 років тому

      David - The piper warrior is very easy to fly, just get with an instructor and get going! They'll walk you through the entire process. Plan on around $7500 and 2 to 6 months.

    • @pilotandy_com
      @pilotandy_com 6 років тому

      Gregory - Having a welding background will definitely be beneficial, but the majority of an aircraft is riveted together. If I were to build an airplane, I'd go with a Vans RV.
      www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-building.htm
      Pick the plane you want for the mission you will be flying, and have fun!

    • @Campsnowcactus
      @Campsnowcactus 6 років тому

      Join the Experimental Aircraft Association and you will find out everything you need to know. Go to Oshkosh air show.

  • @Michaelengelmann
    @Michaelengelmann 4 роки тому +254

    What does that mean, "its forgiving"
    Me: *hits plane out of rage
    Me: " oh, I'm so sorry baby"
    Plane: "it's ok, I forgive you". *. *It’s a joke

    • @jammer3618
      @jammer3618 4 роки тому +28

      I will assume this is an honest question. It means if you screw up as a pilot, the plane is easier to recover.

    • @KerbalChris
      @KerbalChris 4 роки тому +17

      It means the plane wants to correct itself, this is because of the stable nature of high wing designs also you won’t need the extra maintenance on fuel pumps because the fuel can flow fine using gravity

    • @L0stEngineer
      @L0stEngineer 4 роки тому +17

      Both Cessna 172 and Cessna 152 are statically and dynamically stable. If you are in a bad spot, let go of the controls and the plane will sort itself. In other words, the plane isn't trying to kill you.

    • @tianzining
      @tianzining 4 роки тому +3

      Thanks for the question and all the comments. I thought it was my English problem. Now I’m totally understand.

    • @mdynasty8219
      @mdynasty8219 4 роки тому +1

      Me: that damage is beyond allowable limits per 43.13.-1A/1B and Amm. Thats gonna cost ya

  • @mojogrip
    @mojogrip  6 років тому +16

    Part II. 5 Personal Airplanes You Can Buy For Less Than $20,000 ua-cam.com/video/Xi1sy93c_Xg/v-deo.html

  • @imthefuckinglizardking4590
    @imthefuckinglizardking4590 6 років тому +30

    I helped a friend get a little 142 flight worthy and he bought it for 10grand and put about 200 bucks in parts in it. It's got half an old vw bug motor literally a 4cyl boxer cut in half. Pretty crazy

    • @crazylegoarmy
      @crazylegoarmy 6 років тому +1

      im thefuckinglizardking lol nice username

    • @Michael-hc6rg
      @Michael-hc6rg 6 років тому +2

      i also heard about a guy that built his own WWI replica biplane using a lawnmower engine

  • @Quasihamster
    @Quasihamster 6 років тому +815

    So no A380 then? Pity...

  • @shannonwittman950
    @shannonwittman950 5 років тому +10

    Great video! The affordability of the zillions of 172's out there, help to keep the prices of 150's and 152's well within reach of community-airport pilots who want their own simple flyabout planes. I wish you'd included the Alon Aircoupe in this list.

  • @theoriginalpauly
    @theoriginalpauly 6 років тому +6

    Good video, thanks for making it! I totally agree about the Grumman: low-wing aircraft just look "cooler" (more aggressive, faster, sportier) than high-wing aircraft. I think I prefer the look of the Piper, but the Grumman has a really distinctive look, so I can understand someone preferring it over the Piper.

  • @kevinhall5645
    @kevinhall5645 6 років тому +4

    We just bought a Piper Warrior II for 35K but it had a Garmin 430. Awesome plane for us to build time in. Love your videos great job!

  • @judsonlero5402
    @judsonlero5402 4 роки тому +6

    i would recommemd the piper cherokee, it is a very solid plane, easy steering, and lands beautifully

    • @7478captain
      @7478captain 4 роки тому +1

      Yes, the low wing pipers are supposedly “easier” to fly than even the docile Cessnas. Even though I have my Commercial Pilot Certificate and Instrument rating, with over 400 hours, I have never flown the Pipers (or any low wing aircraft for that matter). All I’ve flown is 172s (M, SP and RG) and 152s

    • @peterbretherton3546
      @peterbretherton3546 3 роки тому

      I like low wing better because when landing the wing doesn't block your view while turning like the high wing of the 150/172.

  • @alexg700f
    @alexg700f 5 років тому +5

    0:38 the Cessna 152 is the same thing but more fuel efficient and newer. Oh and it also has a fixed tricycle gear

  • @masonic6688
    @masonic6688 5 років тому +2

    If you dream of being an airline pilot just go here in my country Philippines. You're allowed to fly up to 1500 hours as pilot in command the flying school fee would range 2 million-5 million pesos (32k-60k). Package would include private pilot license, single engine rating, instrumentation rating, multi engine rating, ground school and they would help you get type rated for airbus a320 family. Food and lodging included with the tuition it is usually 8-12 months to complete cheers!

  • @jpfinneran
    @jpfinneran 5 років тому +8

    Very helpful, well spoken, clear and knowledgeable. Must watch for new/interested ga aircraft seekers

  • @sahhull
    @sahhull 4 роки тому

    I live in the UK.
    1993 I got my PPL and a Cessna 150, bought very used for less than the price of a 2nd hand car... Sold it 2 years later to the flying school after converting to helicopters and bought a Robinson R22 which I still own and fly today.
    OMG... I'd never be able to afford to start from scratch today.

    • @7478captain
      @7478captain 4 роки тому

      That is because of what your country has turned into!! But Boris Johnson is back at the helm (Britain’s version of Trump). So maybe there is hope for your country after all??

  • @MrJrbryan
    @MrJrbryan 6 років тому +13

    Mike, I'm not a pilot but love airplanes...your voice and was you describe these aircraft is great...good job..held my interest

  • @0justLook
    @0justLook 6 років тому +14

    Thank You Mike. Your videos are always informative, fair, and unbiased. Keep up the good work. Inspiring one to fly could be life-changing encouragement for some ppl. You may never know how your work changes lives for the better. Ignore, delete, block the haters.
    Also, do you have a video on the Two styles of Sonics? One has a V-Tail, and appears to have a Jet engine??? Or could you make one??

    • @mojogrip
      @mojogrip  6 років тому +2

      I'll def try and make one. Constantly checking for owners and builders close to me. Thanks.

    • @cw93711
      @cw93711 4 роки тому

      The jet engine is not a certified engine for the kit.
      Sonex is located in Oshkosh wis home of eaa. It's a great little kit plane. My step father wanted me to build one but I went a different direction.
      They do have a lot of options, even a motor glider if I remember right.

  • @keithfreeman5204
    @keithfreeman5204 6 років тому +6

    How about this?
    A Sonex with a full, nose to tail, Delta Wing? A lot of square feet of Wing Area and very slippery, maybe retracks? Evelons, rudder, really simple controls.

  • @aaroncriddle3960
    @aaroncriddle3960 3 роки тому +1

    I'm a 15 year old looking into aviation and this was very helpful

  • @josemmontes5810
    @josemmontes5810 6 років тому +3

    Hey Mike, great video, some people might see some discrepancies like the "over inflated prices" comments however I think that overall your video gives good info.
    My one tip is that although your video is about airplane prices and not maintenance cost you should have mentioned having a little caution with the maintenance needs of these older aircraft and how the price can change drastically depending on how much time is on the engine, actually you might want to do a future video on the hidden cost of buying a plane.

    • @seigeengine
      @seigeengine 5 років тому

      No. There's really no need to do that at all. The process of getting licensed takes months and thousands of dollars, only to then need to spend tens of thousands on a plane.
      If you're stupid enough to expect a ten minute video to be all you need to know, you're too stupid to make decisions.

  • @jhmcd2
    @jhmcd2 6 років тому +1

    If you get a 172, get a S series. It has far more power and the heavier engine actually makes it easier to recover from stalls and land, as unlike lighter C172's, it doesn't like to float and glide as much. Trust me, it took me forever to get my landings down on the standard C172, but after two landings in the S-series, I was nailing them.

  • @irishpilot2006
    @irishpilot2006 6 років тому +6

    Perhaps on the Grumman the author was confusing an AA1 with a Tiger, the AA1 has 450lbs useful. from review: "The AA1B has a basic useful load of more than 450 pounds. While not great, it beats the rest of the AA1 lineup by 50 to 90 pounds. Produced between 1973 and 1976,"

  • @lordelectrichv2411
    @lordelectrichv2411 6 років тому +2

    I know that the Grumman Cheetah AA-5A is a 4 place plane and 30K for one is a bit of a stretch but a wonderfully comfortable, and safe airplane worthy of consideration. Other experimental planes such as these designed by Burt Rutan pusher design with cruising speeds just shy of 200mph. Varieze under 15K long ez and the Cozy 3under 30K.

  • @chevy8258
    @chevy8258 4 роки тому +6

    “I would trade my Honda Accord for this airplane any day” had me dying 😂

  • @PR-lw2oq
    @PR-lw2oq 3 роки тому +2

    Got my certification in 1993. Can’t wait to get current again

  • @hogey74
    @hogey74 6 років тому +5

    This is true and now is actually the time. The people who bought all the aircraft during the boom from the 50s to the 70s are all ageing out. There are a lot of useful aircraft coming up for sale with a lot of good hours left in them and very good prices. I reckon there will be a mini boom as a result.

  • @PC-vq5ud
    @PC-vq5ud 6 років тому +1

    Grumman A1AA: Max load about 500LBS. Quirky stall characteristics, have to stay on the power when landing. Designed by Bede before Grumman took it over. Fuel tanks are the main wing spar that is a pipe. Two to 2.5 hour range. Mike, I think your were looking at the specs for the A5AA Traveler. Hard to get for $30K unless it is time to re-engine or similliar additional costs. I do love all the Grumman's looks. They are sporty!!

  • @xzqzq
    @xzqzq 6 років тому +6

    I learned to fly on a 150... the aerobatic version would be interesting... prefer taildraggers.

  • @evanwindom3265
    @evanwindom3265 3 роки тому

    That seam in the windscreen on the Sonex would drive me crazy. I owned a Cessna Hawk XP for a number of years. It had the good manners of a 172, but had an extra 50 hp so it climbed like a homesick angel. It saw a ton of use in airborne search & rescue and mountain flying classes. It's a great platform for both uses.
    One thing the video doesn't provide much info about -- and SHOULD -- is maintenance and repairs. Yes, you can buy an older airplane for bargain prices, but you're also going to be looking at timed-life components needing replacement, potential corrosion issues, etc. It's easy to end up spending many thousands of dollars you didn't plan on when a mechanic finds an issue during an annual inspection. So, if you buy an airplane, be sure you sock away enough cash (hopefully before you buy) to take care of unplanned expenses because they WILL show up.

  • @cyclemanncafe
    @cyclemanncafe 6 років тому +21

    Good video, Mike! Thanks for the effort, look for valid suggestions in comments, ignore mean spirited comments, and please continue to develop your channel.

  • @throe68
    @throe68 6 років тому +1

    I love the Cherokee 140; I've flown Arrows, Warriors, and the Cessna 150/172s. For some reason, I just love the 140. To each their own I suppose...

  • @joeb.5020
    @joeb.5020 6 років тому +17

    150 or 172 depending on student/instructor fatniss

  • @MyLifeThai371
    @MyLifeThai371 2 роки тому

    We have a 1966 Cessna 150 up here in North Dakota for only $12,000. It has been in storage since 2014 on the farm.

  • @wheelswingsnstrings523
    @wheelswingsnstrings523 6 років тому +18

    Why all the negative comments? If you choose not to fly or learn to fly, it’s up to you? Flying and owning an older airplane is really no more expensive than buying a new Harley touring bike, a cheap sports car or racing at a local track.
    Guys don’t whine about the cost of owning, modifying or maintaining those things, and they sure don’t calculate cost per hour of riding and drinking.
    Be smart about your purchase, find a mechanic to work with, learn and make your fun affordable and safe.

  • @MrJpbmusic2005
    @MrJpbmusic2005 3 роки тому +1

    When you take into consideration the Sonex has Removable wings ...there goes your hangerage and parking cost.... So in the long run it wiil save you on operating cost $$$$

  • @tightenyochain856grom6
    @tightenyochain856grom6 6 років тому +15

    Think ill just get a paramotor lol

  • @learnerchris
    @learnerchris 3 роки тому

    I started super cub but flew my first cross country solo flying on a Grumman and I loved it!

  • @nonyabeeznuss304
    @nonyabeeznuss304 3 роки тому +7

    "I would trade my honda accord for one of these any day"
    driving a honda accord (profuse sweating)

  • @willdog7777
    @willdog7777 3 роки тому +1

    Does anyone else feel like planes just have “that smell”. You know what I mean? Anyways great video, my family own a piper cherokee 180. Great airplane. Overall, it has a lot better weight and balance, and can take a lot more weight than a Cessna 172. It just depends if you like high-wing or low-wing.

  • @tyronealfonso
    @tyronealfonso 5 років тому +21

    “Brain starmer” lol

    • @InventorInvestor
      @InventorInvestor 4 роки тому

      He says the same in other videos.

    • @mooseknuckle_4474
      @mooseknuckle_4474 4 роки тому

      Came here to say this. Like dude......how? How do you get this one so wrong. Lol.
      Otherwise good video

  • @isaacshultz8128
    @isaacshultz8128 6 років тому

    I'm building a Sonex and working on my private pilot license! The Sonex is a fantastic plane and I'm glad to see you giving it some spotlight!

  • @Araye
    @Araye 6 років тому +359

    I don't understand the hate you receive. I think this video does exactly what it claims to do, gives five examples of planes you can pick up for $30k.
    "But what about maintenance??? RRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!"
    I don't even understand this argument. Anyone in the market knows used aircraft aren't like used cars off some dealer's lot and will require some additional costs to make the bird airworthy. SMH

    • @remihumanantium3282
      @remihumanantium3282 6 років тому +4

      Well, I neither don't understand. However, the same video including yearly budget (even approximately) would be great. I already have the $30,000 but how much should I save for an average operating budget, saying 2 h a week?

    • @evandickson19
      @evandickson19 6 років тому

      Araye “REEEEEE” 😂😂

    • @jhmcglynn
      @jhmcglynn 6 років тому +3

      Buying the airplane is the least expense. The annual fixed costs for my Kitfox was $3600 for hangar, about $1200 for insurance, and about $900 for the annual condition inspection. You can mitigate some of these costs. For example at our glider club we purchased a full A/C covers since we have to store them outside. Those cost about $1500 a set. Insurance for tail draggers is more expensive. My last owner assisted annual cost me a good bottle of wine as a gift for my A&P hangar mate.

    • @danielwillets2346
      @danielwillets2346 6 років тому +5

      Brainstormer? You mean barnstormers?

    • @connorvaughn7968
      @connorvaughn7968 6 років тому +3

      I can tell you're between the age of 9 and 15, because you say "Reeee".....

  • @Bryan-qd4fk
    @Bryan-qd4fk 6 років тому

    I like the wings above the cockpit because they allow you to see the ground better. Where I live, flying is the best way to see the beautiful landscape

  • @michaeljenkins6682
    @michaeljenkins6682 6 років тому +3

    What about airplanes like a Pitts.. smith mini... baby Great Lakes.. sorry I just really love cheap small biplanes

    • @cw93711
      @cw93711 4 роки тому

      Pitts will be over 50k minimum.
      Their is one fully acrobatic 2 seat with a canopy that will be around 30 to 35k but I can't think of name of company

  • @clark3830
    @clark3830 6 років тому +1

    Just so you know, the United States Air Force Auxiliary has a fleet of 550 Cessna's and flies SAR and ER daily. It is the worlds largest fleet of Cessna's and probably of all aircraft. Lt. Col. Clark

  • @abbozzz5483
    @abbozzz5483 5 років тому +10

    I'll trade my accord for a plane anyday 😂

  • @generalrendar7290
    @generalrendar7290 5 років тому +1

    Wow I never would have thought about Grumman, I really like that plane for the mission of affordable and fast XC flying with good luggage capacity. I'd like it to be IFR capable but I'm really interested in this plane. Thanks Mojo!

  • @jameshauser1507
    @jameshauser1507 6 років тому +3

    Nice video thank you for making this. But please, please. It is Barnstormer---not, Brain-stormer.

  • @1969cmp
    @1969cmp 6 років тому +2

    The only plane I have flown was a Cherokee Arrow 2 over twenty years ago. Nice plane.

  • @joshuawesley9015
    @joshuawesley9015 6 років тому +16

    The three “F” rule. If it Flies, Floats or F*cks, RENT IT! Trust me, I’m an aircraft mechanic.

    • @zrbbg9639
      @zrbbg9639 4 роки тому +3

      "F*ucks"
      You have my trust

    • @donalain69
      @donalain69 4 роки тому +1

      wise mans words.. wish I had read that before I married 🙄

    • @lyleswan6671
      @lyleswan6671 3 роки тому

      dude is not even lying!

  • @ballwizz23
    @ballwizz23 6 років тому

    Excellent videos. These types of videos are not normally this well done. But you gave some good options with videos and specs. Thanks!

  • @greatbritishscarface7464
    @greatbritishscarface7464 6 років тому +4

    You didn’t include the Piper J3 Cub.

    • @cw93711
      @cw93711 4 роки тому

      Or kitfox

    • @burn3874
      @burn3874 3 роки тому

      And you missed the Midget Mustang.

  • @arturus
    @arturus 5 років тому +1

    Great video. Been dabbling in getting my Sports License and I gotta say, the feeling of flying and landing a plane is amazing!

  • @yummyumsOG
    @yummyumsOG 6 років тому +4

    Thanks mike. :)

  • @singleproppilot
    @singleproppilot 5 років тому

    You missed the Beechcraft Musketeer series. They are some of the least expensive four-place certified airplanes available. The series includes the 150 HP Sport, the 165 HP Musketeer and Custom, the 180 HP Sundowner, the 200 HP Super, and the 200 HP retractable Sierra. Some Supers and Sierras also came built as six seaters. They may not be as attractive looking as some others, but they’re well built with surprising useful load and performance for the cost.

  • @mothman-jz8ug
    @mothman-jz8ug 6 років тому +20

    The comments are sickening. It matters not what is said, the trolls HAVE to pouince on it with derision. He says "initial investment" and all the trolls - poor, sick human being who must downgrade everything and everyone just to make themselves appear "superior" (in their own eyes) - start with the "what about maintenance" and so on. Too dumb to even understand the words they hear, but the are so smart (in their pathetic little minds) that they have to tell everything "wrong". Disgusting bunch of negative people... LOOK AT THE TITLE: "5 Personal Airplanes You Can Buy For Less Than $30,000". It does NOT say "Airplanes you can buy, overhaul, maintain, put fuel in, and insure for life under $30,000"!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @craigwi1412
    @craigwi1412 6 років тому +1

    I have at one time or another many budget airplanes but the ones I always like was the Gruman or the Cessna 177 both are sporty and fast for the lower cost airplanes and usually get the 177 for less than the 172.

  • @spiro5327
    @spiro5327 6 років тому +7

    You say that if you can afford a brand new Honda then you can afford to own your own plane. The only problem is that these planes are not new. They are probably 40 to 50 years old and and just like an old car you will be constantly pouring money into the old bird. The reality is that GA aircraft are not affordable. Bring the cost of a brand-new Cessna 172 down to less than 100k and then you can say it's affordable or at least for some people anyway.

    • @jaroslavsevcik3421
      @jaroslavsevcik3421 6 років тому +1

      You didn't get Spiro's idea. Paying today a price of NEW honda for an OLD aircraft brings you more problems tomorrow and it will drain your wallet quickly. How many people buy old cars for a daily usage? Almost none because they know those cars limits including lack of spare parts. So this is the same with aircraft. Plus driving a car actually hasn't changed too much but FAA/ICAO rules and requirement for flying have. So buying an old aircraft needs often some upgrades which increases the final price of the bird.

    • @seigeengine
      @seigeengine 5 років тому +1

      Irrelevant. Aircraft need to be maintained nigh-religiously, whereas most cars are abused and neglected to the point they're scrap in 10-20 years. You are making excuses to complain. Grow up.

  • @Flying4Film
    @Flying4Film 5 років тому +2

    I'm currently saving money to purchase either a 150 or 172 in the next 2 years. Great video.

    • @sparklerzrainbow
      @sparklerzrainbow 5 років тому

      Flying 4 Film I’m currently flying a 172 with a bore kit in it and I love it amazing plane to learn in really forgiving good luck man :) I’m in the process of buying the plane in my profile pic (citabria 7kcab 1968

  • @futurenepaldevlopment2657
    @futurenepaldevlopment2657 6 років тому +4

    Plz make video for jet engines too

  • @sarc88
    @sarc88 2 роки тому +1

    Hay Mike - I fact checked all of these on trader, brainstorm, and canopy - all of them are pretty much 56-75 now. Some owners hang on to that sentiment!

    • @codyzumr4040
      @codyzumr4040 Рік тому +1

      Meme Flu has really ruined everything.
      These prices would have been true upto 2019
      But now as everything Aviation especially has inflated and plane prices are up the roof. Someone at my airfield got C120 for 20k before 2019 and same plane has doubled now

  • @ronjohnson303
    @ronjohnson303 6 років тому +21

    Leaseback is a bad idea, students are very hard on airplanes and guess who pays for the maintenance

    • @Gypsy2057
      @Gypsy2057 6 років тому +2

      I'm using a 152 for example but I'd set up a per hours leaseback at 80% of what the school charges, figure the annual + engine time and work out the cost per hour. The school keeps the tank full and add in the oil changes exc, so for example you come up with $40/hr cost, charge $45/hr. Should be close if you add in everything. Payment 400/month, overhaul 2,000 hours $15,000 so say $10/hr for motor use, go through everything.

  • @sergiofreitas9368
    @sergiofreitas9368 6 років тому +1

    Taking my PPL-A, the school has 172's and 182's and they are preety nice, they're the G1000 models, but I went online and found a 1992 C172 for only 23k€, I spent about 1000€ on a full checkup, had a few things missing and I reupholstered the seats, but it was really cheap. I shared the costs with 4 of my mates that were also taking the license, and we'd pay for fuel individually, then divide the maintenance, insurance, tiedown, etc... 10 months later, has almost paid itself back, and there are more people who I rent the airplane to. So yes my friends, plane sharing is an investment worth while

  • @rocketplayz5834
    @rocketplayz5834 6 років тому +4

    Ummm ill just make my own homemade airplane

  • @marvinthomas2993
    @marvinthomas2993 6 років тому +1

    You forgot to mention the Piper Tomahawk which I know got some unfair tags placed on it, but any airplane can labeled dangerous if not flown correctly, and it can be just as affordable as these other examples. Thanks for the video.

  • @robertschumann9059
    @robertschumann9059 6 років тому +3

    What about the ercoupe?

  • @elk9414
    @elk9414 6 років тому +1

    As long as we're including kit planes I'd toss in the Zenith CH 750 STOL not because it's fast, not because it's sexy, but because it's cheap, easy to fly and can take off in about 100 feet.

  • @suhdude9775
    @suhdude9775 6 років тому +10

    no ac-130? cheap and affordable

  • @sarc88
    @sarc88 2 роки тому +1

    Super informative Mike, thanks!!

  • @Karen-lc8be
    @Karen-lc8be 6 років тому +11

    "C E S S N A I S M O M ' S C A R"

  • @zamsoniteb8306
    @zamsoniteb8306 5 років тому

    This vid made me wanna fly again. Living in Europe (Sweden) I used to pay a lot to fly 45 min in a Cessna 150 or Piper PA-28. The aircrafts were all from the 60s or 70s. If I was living in the U.S. I would definately get one of those and share costs with other pilots. Thanks for the great vid.

  • @h7pubg
    @h7pubg 6 років тому +7

    9:19 wait that doesn’t look like it sits 2

    • @amaanmahammad2296
      @amaanmahammad2296 6 років тому

      one on the top of the cockpit

    • @brandonhebert5485
      @brandonhebert5485 6 років тому

      He actually shows the entire line of Sonex aircraft. The Sonex, Waiex, Zenos and SubSonex. You won't find that jet powered Sonex for under 100,000 big ones. You also show the Onex, the one with folding wings. That only holds one person.

  • @bradyn.poulsen
    @bradyn.poulsen 2 роки тому

    The Sand Hollow flyover at 2:09 is awesome!

  • @archktik
    @archktik 6 років тому +5

    very nice videogot some tips

  • @maxrudder6091
    @maxrudder6091 5 років тому

    I started in Grummans. They're fast and fun, but they're not as forgiving as the 150. If you lose the engine, they don't plummet out of the sky, but you'd better have something to land on nearby. Stall can develop into spins with a little inattention, while it takes quite an effort to get a 150 to spin. Grummans aren't particularly unsafe, but the 150 is a better choice for a beginner. Another problem with two-seat Grummans is they're cramped. They were too small for me (at 6'4"), and I had to move to the four-seat Cheetah to accomodate my legs. Besides, when you're building time, you're looking for low bucks-per-hour, and speed isn't important. A few extra minutes per leg will build that time in your logbook.

    • @pjhudson5344
      @pjhudson5344 5 років тому

      or you just pencil whip that little book into shape like all the other kids working at the FBO, if your goal is merely add time to your logs.

    • @maxrudder6091
      @maxrudder6091 5 років тому

      @@pjhudson5344 That's a really bad idea in the era of computer-tracked information. It's too easy to get caught. This guy got four years probation in federal court for using falsely-logged time to get an instrument rating: wcfcourier.com/news/local/update-student-pilot-gets-probation-for-false-records/article_c8855eea-ec5c-11e1-9d12-0019bb2963f4.html

  • @arod1pilot
    @arod1pilot 6 років тому +4

    How about the piper tomahawk

    • @ronjohnson303
      @ronjohnson303 6 років тому

      Antonio Rodriguez. The piper tomahawk is a piece of shit.

    • @arod1pilot
      @arod1pilot 6 років тому

      Ron Johnson yea ive had lots of ppl complain about it but I did my pvt and instrument rating on it. But I've heard it's also a scary one to spin

    • @piperpilot26
      @piperpilot26 6 років тому

      That's why it's commonly referred to as the "Tramahawk."

    • @arod1pilot
      @arod1pilot 6 років тому +1

      Shaun Daskam I never had a issue with it and yes I've heard that before fly one maybe youlle like it

    • @marvinthomas2993
      @marvinthomas2993 6 років тому +1

      Antonio Rodriguez. I love the Piper Tomahawk, got many hours in them, hell I even got 5 radio control Tomahawks.

  • @wmuengineer
    @wmuengineer 3 роки тому

    The lease back idea is game changing from a financial perspective. Thanks for sharing that detail.

  • @call911forcookies2
    @call911forcookies2 6 років тому +9

    This is all true; but guys, remeber, these fixed costs are the smallest amounts in your investment. Maintenance is pricey ;O

    • @brandonhebert5485
      @brandonhebert5485 6 років тому +2

      I happen to hold an A&P license. Should that help the cost a bit?

    • @гига-нигга
      @гига-нигга 6 років тому +1

      no shit maintanence is pricey, anyone buying an aircraft knows that

  • @jacobw446
    @jacobw446 6 років тому

    My Cessna 150m costs me $20k to buy, which is $350/month on loan. $35/month tie down. About $650/year insurance because I am new student pilot. $1200/year inspection (plus parts) Biggest cost... the instructor and gas prices going up. Maybe in a few years, $5000 for a rebuilt engine because mine is at 1450 time on engine.
    1979 Cessna 150M
    IFR rated, with complete dual, two channel radio's. Probably over $10k in radios included.
    The guy I bought it from had a baby on the way, and NEEDED to sell it ASAP.

  • @mroger29sh
    @mroger29sh 6 років тому +3

    mark r pa usa thx excellent vid nuff said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @preets.customs
    @preets.customs 6 років тому +1

    The 172 is the safest plane you can get for that price, also with all the expenses you'd be paying around 5-10k a year plus the cost of the plane

  • @poobinatch
    @poobinatch 6 років тому +37

    “Brainstormers”. Heh

    • @dentech987
      @dentech987 6 років тому +4

      Definately needs an edit.
      Heard it 3 times I think? ......It's "BARNSTORMERS"!

    • @polyscient
      @polyscient 6 років тому

      www.barnstormers.com/

    • @toml1446
      @toml1446 6 років тому

      and GrOmmen

  • @LeftSeatAdventures
    @LeftSeatAdventures 4 роки тому +2

    This was one of the many MANY videos I watched before I bought my Sonex. And much less than $30k at that, but I also got a project. Since the B models came out, flying legacy ones are easily going $20k-30k. Old Cessna prices continue to rise in this market. Add the much cheaper maintenance and operating costs of experimental and it's #winwinwin . Thanks for all the info!

  • @Ansset0
    @Ansset0 6 років тому +18

    I'm sorry, where is maintenance cost factored here? That's why those planes are so cheap.
    Within 2 years or couple hundred FH/FC (depends on what You buy) You're facing maintenance bills which will dwarf initial buying cost. If You hit a major overhaul, You're doomed :)
    ------------------------------------
    In western EU (prices are similar in US, I suppose) C172 class :
    Instrument check 400-1000 euro
    Insurance 1200-4000 euro (depends on A/C and pilot)
    Engine overhaul/rebuild 16-25k euro (every 1200-2200 FH) (rotax 9xx or IO-360 class)
    100 FH check 1000 -3000 euro (If everything is ok, when You add repair cost or NDT or structural job or anything else, bills will be a lot bigger)
    Prop overhaul (1000 FH) - 800- 1500 euro
    Prop new - 4000 euro+
    Euro/USD exchange ratio: ~1 / 1.2
    -----------------------------------------------
    Buying a budget A/C is similar to buying a budget car. Most likely You won't keep Your 15-20 yo car because of maintenance cost and personal safety. That's exactly why A/C owners are getting rid of them.
    Don't fall for it.
    On the other hand: teach Your kids flying. They will never have enough money for drugs :D

    • @call911forcookies2
      @call911forcookies2 6 років тому +2

      Ha, your last statement is so true ;D

    • @jhmcglynn
      @jhmcglynn 6 років тому +2

      I think the costs you mentioned are over inflated. We get a pitot static check for $250 here in FL, USA. I am with Mike Bush of the EAA and overhaul when the shows signs of significant wear, such as low compression. You can also mitigate fixed costs by taking on partners.

    • @Ansset0
      @Ansset0 6 років тому

      Pitot static inspection alone is $250. It's one of many instruments, isn't it? What about others electromechanical insturmentation, not to mention getting all the electronics inspected or upgraded (software)?

    • @jhmcglynn
      @jhmcglynn 6 років тому +2

      Ansset0 - the pitot static inspection is a calibration test performed every other year. Typically a pre-buy inspection should point out any other shortcomings.

    • @jhmcglynn
      @jhmcglynn 6 років тому

      Mike, you mentioned that the Grumman AA1A has a 1000 lb useful load. It’s typical empty weight is 1018 lbs and gross weight is 1500 lbs. useful load would therefore be 482 lbs. You also said it had a long range. Ain’t true Mike. I checked out in one years and recall about a 22 gallon tank. At 6GPH that’s about 3.5 hours. Oh, and Mike, it’s Barnstormers.com, not Brainstormers😊

  • @Needcoffeeee
    @Needcoffeeee 5 років тому

    Piper Tomahawk is an easy plane to fly. Its got a cool throttle and mixture control that gives you that big plane feel