Thanks for the helpful video. I have a question. At 0:34, why do the individual numbers of the first row minus the individual numbers of the 2nd row. Can the alternative be all the numbers of the 1st row minus the pivot element only? Secondly ,at 1:25 timing, why is R3-4R2 equal to 1 for the first column? Shouldnt it be -1 as 3-4(1) = -1. And why is R4 + 8R2 = -2 in the first column. Shouldnt it be 2 as -6 + 8(1) = 2? Please assist. Thanks a lot
Great video but if I try substituting those values into the 3rd equation 3x+y-2z>=4 3(4/3)+1(10/3)+z(0)=22/3, which is greater than 4. So i'm not sure if i'm mistaken or if there is an error somewhere
Best, clearest explanation of the whole internet !! The last minute cleared it up. Bravo!!
very nice!! I couldn't find more clear an easy exposition than yours. Thanks.
You are very efficient, effect method and clear explanation.
Love your presentation.
Nice, I appreciate the assistance. Lovely teaching skills by the way.
Legend!!! Thanks so much, I wish there were more teachers like you!!
very clear explanation of the method thank you very much you save my life before my exam !!
God bless you! Best explanation on YT
Correct. But the inequality is that is greater than or equal to 4, so there is no problem
Thanks Meghan!! what about number of constraints less than number of variables?
Finally i have got to understand this method Thanks alot🥰
Thanks for the helpful video. I have a question. At 0:34, why do the individual numbers of the first row minus the individual numbers of the 2nd row. Can the alternative be all the numbers of the 1st row minus the pivot element only?
Secondly ,at 1:25 timing, why is R3-4R2 equal to 1 for the first column? Shouldnt it be -1 as 3-4(1) = -1. And why is R4 + 8R2 = -2 in the first column. Shouldnt it be 2 as -6 + 8(1) = 2?
Please assist. Thanks a lot
What a jet you are! pride of women and super mind! God blessed you!
Hhuh, WOMEN!
You are a king! Thank you sooo much! It's simple, easy, and so clear now!... :D
It is well explained Thank you ma..
All correct, just in the(#'s) collum it should be 1/3 , 1/3, 2/3, 14/3
Great video but if I try substituting those values into the 3rd equation 3x+y-2z>=4
3(4/3)+1(10/3)+z(0)=22/3, which is greater than 4. So i'm not sure if i'm mistaken or if there is an error somewhere
No error. It satisfies the condition that it is greater than 4.
What if there is mixed equations? Can you help me out?
when do we have to use the Dual Method ?
why didn't we solve this in the primal way :( ?
Any answer plz ?
Thanks for the video : )
because we are trying to minimize the objective function
God bless you❤️
Thanks . This was really helpful.
Awesome!
Have a mistake in final table with second row
Thank you alot
subscribed
a question: what if there is negative value under the z column? do we continue or take that negative value as the value of z? thanks
thank u!!