Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Part 1 - Solving a Standard Maximization Problem using the Simplex Method

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 бер 2010
  • This video is the 1st part of a video that demonstrates how to solve a standard maximization problem using the simplex method. References to using the TI-84 plus calculator are also given.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 244

  • @tklyfe
    @tklyfe 3 роки тому +245

    10 hours to the exam. Bless.

  • @sharangrane557
    @sharangrane557 8 років тому +169

    You saved me from failing in exam today. My exam was in the afternoon and I saw this video at morning. Before that I didn't know how to solve the problem at all. Thanks.

  • @leonard1871
    @leonard1871 3 роки тому +8

    The level of clearity exhibited in explaining this is nothing short of amazing ..wow

  • @shaunhartley9813
    @shaunhartley9813 10 років тому +56

    This tutorial is so straight forward and easy to understand! I might just pass my semester test thanks to you

  • @hardwarejunkie9
    @hardwarejunkie9 11 років тому +6

    Excellent job. This is a perfect example. Easy to follow and consistent. It's really helping me catch up from being gone for a week in a grad class.

  • @roshhack
    @roshhack 11 років тому +5

    You're amazing. I was trying to learn this method from months and you did it in few minutes. Tons and tons of thanks!

  • @ashihtaka
    @ashihtaka 13 років тому +26

    honestly, I'm enrolled in a linear programming course (operations research) in engineering at U of T, and the professor has a phd and probably other extensive background in this, but after 5 weeks of lecture, she didn't teach me crap.
    This pretty much taught me more than $1000 of classes. Thank you for explaining every step and why it's necessary.

  • @BarbaraRademacher
    @BarbaraRademacher Рік тому +5

    I've made handouts for my students urging them to watch your video. You explain very well.

  • @nargesm65
    @nargesm65 9 років тому +5

    Thanks my man! I Wish college teachers could teach like this. Much love!

  • @TsiHang
    @TsiHang 4 роки тому +6

    You saved me 50 pages worth of PowerPoint slide reading

  • @sludgepuppy
    @sludgepuppy 3 роки тому

    Explained so well. I can't believe my lecturer wasted his time writing his textbook for it to make no sense when the topic is this simple.

  • @starryman1595
    @starryman1595 3 роки тому +1

    One step closer to the perfection.Thanks for this Video !

  • @AhmedZekry911
    @AhmedZekry911 8 років тому

    Thanks Scott that really really helps alot, i had my first midterm in this sheet all i had to do was watching this video after i had mind freezing trying to understand what is this!! But after your video i understood everything, and now on my second midterm tomorrow all i have to do is watching ur videi again to refresh things up and boom i finished studying, but the branch and bound method i dont understand it and i haven't seen any good video, but thanks alot again

  • @ashimanarulaYOLO
    @ashimanarulaYOLO 9 років тому +26

    I have my exam in 8 hours,
    Thank you for saving my butt.
    God bless 😊

  • @pernormann4869
    @pernormann4869 10 років тому +6

    Looks to me as if you're minimizing the transformed system. Why are you not stating that in your tutorial?
    Great clip!

  • @bentruong3
    @bentruong3 14 років тому

    thanks a bunch. im going to have a midterm tomorrow exactly on this and you helped alot!

  • @YoussefBouhjira
    @YoussefBouhjira 9 років тому

    Thank you for this very good exaplanation. You have a new subscriber

  • @JDLupus
    @JDLupus 12 років тому +2

    As i listen, I can't help but think you sound scarily similar to Levni Yilmaz of "Tales of Mere Existence" fame, which is a MASSIVE compliment, by the way :)
    Thank you very much for the Simplex booster; I needed it badly.

  • @sandyjoy41993
    @sandyjoy41993 11 років тому +22

    It's going to be -3/5 AND not 3/5 under s2

  • @JamesABrannan
    @JamesABrannan 10 років тому

    Very good. Thanks greatly for this! Easily understood.

  • @Jaydev-oj2hx
    @Jaydev-oj2hx 2 роки тому +1

    You were amazing! Thank you. Please make a video on dual primal method. Please

  • @Marcos10PT
    @Marcos10PT 6 років тому +25

    at 1:00 you mention the number of non basic variables but you don't explain the reasoning behind it :/

  • @ishimarumichiko
    @ishimarumichiko 13 років тому

    TQ VERY MUCH!!! I'm having Final exam 2morrow, and I'm stuck at this kind of question almost 2 hours! =3= , thank god I found your video. You solved my problem ! TQ VERY much ! >"

  • @xkronos815
    @xkronos815 7 років тому +8

    how do you pick a pivot column if you have two of the same most negative indicators?

    • @patrickhodson8715
      @patrickhodson8715 6 років тому +6

      Anthony Delvecchio just pick one of them. It means the set of optimized points lies on one of the lines that defines the boundary of the feasible set, i.e. there’s more than one way to maximize the equation.

  • @tuningjohn5342
    @tuningjohn5342 3 роки тому +5

    Thanks Scott. I wish there was a little more context for this explanation though. Why are you doing what you’re doing? What cases are this method used for? Cheers.

  • @gabrutis
    @gabrutis 11 років тому

    Thanks for posting this video! This helped me out a lot! :)

  • @michellworthington6152
    @michellworthington6152 7 років тому +2

    When finding whether to pivot with either the five or the three, why did you divide the five by eight and the three by ten? Do the three and five not both get divided into the ten? Why not?

  • @ineedaniphone4
    @ineedaniphone4 10 років тому +18

    Hi, thank you for the tutorial! Quick question: when choosing pivot elements, if the ratios are the same, is it okay to choose either one of those two? Thank you!

    • @aquarius_gaurav
      @aquarius_gaurav 2 роки тому +2

      Maybe, I'm a little late but the answer to your question is YES :)

    • @gaminghats813
      @gaminghats813 2 роки тому +8

      @@aquarius_gaurav lmao u are 8 years too late. this person probably has a job and kids now🤣

  • @mishozdr
    @mishozdr 7 років тому +1

    What to do if the "pivoting column" has a zero element? Because we will have to divide by zero when calculating the
    ratio.

  • @ape-in-a-tree9701
    @ape-in-a-tree9701 3 роки тому +1

    great explanation! thank you sir

  • @AliKarimSayed
    @AliKarimSayed 8 років тому +1

    brilliant explanation, what device you have used to write on paper for explanation, your handwriting on video is too good

  • @allard1991
    @allard1991 11 років тому

    Great! Thank you! And what if the objective is to 'minimize'? What are we going to do then?

  • @MrYuvan
    @MrYuvan 12 років тому

    thanks a lot sir.. u really made it very easy to understand..

  • @mrzulu420
    @mrzulu420 13 років тому

    Thanks, much better explanation than teacher's

  • @jnlbermundo
    @jnlbermundo 4 роки тому +5

    The answer on S2 row 1 should be (-3/5).

  • @MiracleIsMyName
    @MiracleIsMyName 8 років тому

    You just saved my life! Thanks!!!

  • @panoskatsos5454
    @panoskatsos5454 4 роки тому +3

    this is youuur daily dose of internet

  • @miftahabdurahmen1023
    @miftahabdurahmen1023 4 роки тому +1

    thank you very much I have got the point which was difficult for me

  • @roul1j
    @roul1j 8 років тому

    Thank you the wonderful explaination :)

  • @siddharthalakandri2102
    @siddharthalakandri2102 6 років тому

    Thanks! Short and easy😊😊

  • @kadriyeeren7525
    @kadriyeeren7525 3 роки тому +1

    how did we decide to write the coefficients of s1 and s2?

  • @riricruz9082
    @riricruz9082 Рік тому +1

    Thank you, so helpful!

  • @malex572
    @malex572 10 років тому

    3 years later and im thanking him for the samething in those exact words =D

  • @Gnsd45
    @Gnsd45 8 років тому

    When i get a negative in the last volume what to i do? Do i compare it with the rest of the values as normally to see if it is the lowest and use it as a pivot row or do i no longer take it into account, just how i would do if there was a zero in the pivot column?

  • @CoolDude911
    @CoolDude911 10 років тому

    So the the constraint collumns tell you information about sensitivity but is there ever any use for the z collumn?

  • @TechFreak51
    @TechFreak51 11 років тому

    Same here .... I have a final & this will help a LOT !!!!

  • @kietasjonas
    @kietasjonas 14 років тому

    Thanks, you helped me a lot!

  • @ayoubloutry494
    @ayoubloutry494 9 років тому

    thanks, very helpful !

  • @guvvalasomasekharreddy4168
    @guvvalasomasekharreddy4168 5 років тому

    How we find real constant values which are in max function and subject constraint s

  • @haweyorashid9419
    @haweyorashid9419 5 років тому

    I do not know how I can thank you, but thank you sooooooooooooooooooooo much!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @bushrayasmeeneverydayvlogs2793
    @bushrayasmeeneverydayvlogs2793 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for sharing

  • @Raxer_th
    @Raxer_th 5 років тому

    I learned that if a constraint is ... >= ... then we must add "-s+r" I wonder what is r stands for? Is it Artificial Variable?

  • @minilymo
    @minilymo 8 років тому

    what happens if you get 1 or 2 negative ratios in the pivot?

  • @abhiyogpatil8158
    @abhiyogpatil8158 10 років тому

    hey cn we use decimals instead of fraction variables

  • @cibokim5758
    @cibokim5758 8 років тому

    Thanks so much it's great!

  • @scottrelliott
    @scottrelliott  14 років тому +1

    Yep, the beta captions are pretty funny on my math videos :-) I need to go back and just do them myself.

  • @skylrgator
    @skylrgator 10 років тому

    what happens when one of the ratios to find the pivot number is negative?

  • @allsimplekings
    @allsimplekings 9 років тому

    Are the same concepts applied to minimization problems?

  • @NikeBoyAmir
    @NikeBoyAmir 5 років тому

    So with the last tableau, what are the solutions?

  • @marlourentucan9023
    @marlourentucan9023 4 роки тому

    so calm ! explained very well ! compared to other tutorials. (specifically those hindu tutorials)

  • @seller6478
    @seller6478 10 років тому

    thankyou for giving me 20 marks in MBA

  • @arvindramesh2283
    @arvindramesh2283 8 років тому

    can the same method for used for min function ???

  • @trose77
    @trose77 12 років тому

    amazing help thank you!

  • @jassanwanjiku348
    @jassanwanjiku348 Рік тому

    Where did you get the negative 3?

  • @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd
    @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd 2 роки тому

    why do we start with the highest coeficient in the obj. function?

  • @hablen
    @hablen 3 роки тому +1

    great thanks

  • @syadabdiyowabdiyow3651
    @syadabdiyowabdiyow3651 3 роки тому +1

    very nice lecture

  • @Ayonbuddy28
    @Ayonbuddy28 10 років тому

    Thank you Sir

  • @shahrukh631
    @shahrukh631 9 років тому +3

    Hello ! I have a confusion with this case, how are we gonna select a pivotal row in this. And thanks for this helpful video !
    x1 Most right column Ratio
    2 40 20
    0 4 infinity
    1 100 100

    • @scottrelliott
      @scottrelliott  9 років тому +2

      shahrukh631
      Start watching around the 4:00 min mark and you should see the answer to your question! Thanks for watching :-)

    • @jaharehardy3561
      @jaharehardy3561 7 років тому

      your so boring and this is ti

  • @BenWannaBee
    @BenWannaBee 13 років тому

    PLEASE MAKE MORE VIDEOS ON THIS STUFF!! :)

  • @emotionsexpress
    @emotionsexpress 14 років тому

    thans a lot.
    this is very useeful video .......

  • @ssrooben
    @ssrooben 12 років тому

    Thank you so much (",) this video very helpful for me..

  • @dijahmasnawi6627
    @dijahmasnawi6627 3 роки тому +1

    You are great!

  • @Veenaali786
    @Veenaali786 9 років тому

    Nice explanation

  • @user-vn4lk3by1h
    @user-vn4lk3by1h 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you for help me ❤️❤️❤️

  • @dssyazwina
    @dssyazwina 11 років тому

    Is this similar to the Primal Dual Simplex Method? I mean, if i use this method instead of the Primal Dual Simple Method, does it guarantees the same answer for optimal solution?

  • @TissDiss
    @TissDiss 9 років тому +1

    Do you have any videos or suggestions on understanding the underlying point of this? I'm learning this now, my teacher pretty much sucks, and I don't really understand what "Standard Maximization" or "optimal" actually mean. I can follow along and basically parrot what I'm shown online and in my book but don't really understand what or why. It's sort of like saying the alphabet because I memorized the letters but have no idea what they're used for, that they make words, sentences, etc.

    • @harrysmyth4540
      @harrysmyth4540 2 роки тому

      This^. I know you made this comment 6 years ago but I'm in exactly the same position now - did you manage to gain some deeper meaning on the subject? If so I would really appreciate it if you could shed some light. Thank you

    • @beligosk
      @beligosk 24 дні тому

      To my understanding, optimal maximization means we are trying to find the maximum value the function can have or the highest z value in the case of this video. At the same time, the value of the variables (x1, x2, x3) must remain inside the constraints.

  • @dhruvdevc
    @dhruvdevc Рік тому +1

    What a useless professor I have. Explained it in a stupidly complex way. Thank you.

  • @scottrelliott
    @scottrelliott  14 років тому +1

    @bentruong3 Glad I could help!

  • @ghozlanedrouaz7578
    @ghozlanedrouaz7578 4 роки тому

    Thank you teacher

  • @cwaprox
    @cwaprox 14 років тому

    thank you so much!

  • @deboisaac4198
    @deboisaac4198 Рік тому

    my question what of if ur smallest ratio is 3.75

  • @danemikkelson1365
    @danemikkelson1365 6 років тому +1

    My nigga, you are the real MVP. Come teach at Iowa State

  • @muhammadirfanjoyia3244
    @muhammadirfanjoyia3244 2 роки тому

    Sir plz answer .. Why we convert minimize fn into maximize for solving it by simplex method??.

  • @joebob2311productions
    @joebob2311productions Рік тому

    Everything was splendid until 5:48. What calculator are you talking about?

  • @Ftbl_AK
    @Ftbl_AK 3 роки тому

    Can you explain where the numbers at 4:02 - 4:15 come from?

    • @scottrelliott
      @scottrelliott  3 роки тому

      Numerator is from the far right column. The denominator is from the pivot column.
      Hope this helps!

  • @shhhka
    @shhhka 5 років тому

    What if its greater than or equal to? What then?

  • @terzokid
    @terzokid 13 років тому

    YOURE AN ANGEL FALLEN DOWN FROM HEAVEN!

  • @Tunee10
    @Tunee10 7 років тому

    Thank you

  • @jenifernabisi824
    @jenifernabisi824 6 місяців тому

    Thanks soo much 😊

  • @kalaiselviask9674
    @kalaiselviask9674 10 років тому

    thnkz alot for video..... but i dnt understand that row function plz help me to clear it :(

  • @mindfreak191191
    @mindfreak191191 10 років тому

    Hi
    Just a quick doubt. While doing the ratio test, Suppose we have the following 3 cases
    CASE 1
    x1 z
    2 40
    -1 5
    1 100
    In this case, the "ratio" is the lowest for 5/-1, ie '5'
    But do we ignore it because x1 is negative? Will we use 40/2 =20 instead?
    CASE 2
    x1 z
    2 50
    5 -100
    Again here, do we consider the ratio to be 25 or "20", do we ignore the 2nd candidate as it iis a -100 resulting in a negative ratio?
    CASE 3
    x1 z
    2 20
    5 50
    Both have a ratio of 10. Can we choose any one or is there some rule here

    • @scottrelliott
      @scottrelliott  10 років тому +1

      Abhinav,
      We do ignore negative ratios. In the case of a tie, just pick one and go with it. I think there are some algorithms to help in the case of a tie, but it won't hurt to just pick one and pivot.
      Hope this helps!
      Scott

    • @mindfreak191191
      @mindfreak191191 9 років тому

      Thanks Scott!

  • @Wittylee8828
    @Wittylee8828 3 роки тому

    U really speak well🥺🥺

  • @Czarlsen
    @Czarlsen Рік тому

    why S1 in the beginning is 1 and 0 and S2 is 0 and 1?

  • @tiagoisaias1468
    @tiagoisaias1468 2 роки тому

    Quatro about When 1 of the slack values is negative

  • @linto15
    @linto15 11 років тому

    Well said

  • @pixeldar5500
    @pixeldar5500 5 років тому +4

    Left 25 min to r exam...
    Me: watch video on youtube

  • @queenolive6080
    @queenolive6080 6 років тому +3

    I still confused

  • @crystalyin184
    @crystalyin184 8 років тому

    super helpful, thank you!
    One question: why do we pivot in the second col? How does the most negative indicator impact the orders of operation we perform on the matrix? Thank you

  • @catherins4233
    @catherins4233 4 роки тому +1

    My question: why did you include Z in 1:42? Im super confused

    • @bae_ily7960
      @bae_ily7960 4 роки тому

      because that's the variable youre maximizing...for the first 2 rows you dont have a z variable so it's always going to be 0 but you need that for the third row, in which it's a 1.