Slavoj Žižek: Subject as Void
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лип 2022
- Clipped from: • 666 and Subjectivity: ...
TREY’s book “Aphesis: The Impossibility of Subjectivity”: amzn.to/3hzxZAR
WE make at least 3 videos a week on Patreon discussing everything from philosophy, to theology, to biblical typology, to music, and to whatever else comes to my head. / telosbound
TELOSBOUND THEOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION: docs.google.com/document/d/1g...
THEOSBOUND: / theosbound
DISCORD: / discord
INSTAGRAM: / telosbound
ODYSSEY: odysee.com/@telosbound:c
GET The Philosopher's Notebook amzn.to/3h7Iyrn
HASHTAGS:
#philosophy #theology #metaphysics #ontology #orthodox #christianity #orthodoxchristianity #communion #church #jesus #christ #catholic #bible #hegel #negation #dialectics #epistemology #psychoanalysis #logic #ethics #theory #socialtheory #apologetics #God #aphesis #subjectivity #paradox #contradiction #reading #books #intellectual #politics #conservative #politicaltheory #sigma
Truly excellent, and I rarely hear Fichte brought up regarding this topic, as well as the crucial distinction between “positing” and “reflecting.” Fichte is invaluable for understanding what is meant by the self as constituted by its own act. Again, extremely well done!
Thank you for the reminder.
I don't understand how this definition of objet a relates to the one that i am familiar with, that of the object's certain je ne sais qua that makes us desire it... the excess of the object which makes us desire it, the excess that we see only when looking awry at the object. Could you please clarify how these two definitions are constitutive of the same concept? I acknowledge that my knowledge of Lacan is cursory.
Is Zizek's ideology tapping into Buddhism, into concepts like emptiness and no-self?
He does in some videos where he comments in the common ideas of the non-existence of the self between psychoanalysis and buddhism.
Hmmm interesting
What was that thing about hats again?
I dont understand lacanian theory well. Instead I am acquainted with the british and american psychoanalysts, following freud's move to england the development of object-relations and british independents, and his influence in america via federn and horney into ego psychology and interpersonal analysis and the jungians.
In this anglo tradition a standard psychoanalytic aim (written in my own words) is of symbolizing and mastering the trauma of this lack, which theoretical and experientially internalises the goodness of what was missing. A process of grief bring eternity inside, so we can tolerate death and disappointment in life, while at the same time seeing the good that reflects the now internalised eternity. This makes us far more than a void - and much more like a portal, a window, a container, or a well.
Please give us an example of the subject as negativity and objet a as its core.
Do you think this void has it's place in an EO ontology?
After rewatching, I see you said you think it's hell. Still trying to understand it all.
@@telosbound So, I guess what's confusing me is what is the thing "doing "? What do you think hypostasis is? A mystery?
@@telosbound Guess I need to pick up a copy of that book being as communion.
Yes. In EO ontology, the Fall of man created the darkness of the Nous (the eye of the soul, the heart of the mind/psyche), a separation from God through corruption and death; thus we lost our likeness (Communion with God) but not our image of God (our free Will to choose good vs evil). Complete loss of Communion with God, the Divine and Sacred is the abyss of Hell. Don't go there.
chatgpt, please explain this video in simple terms using good jokes and obscenities so my simply brain can grasp it.
Is God "objet a" as such?
@telosbound Yes, please. I'm edanan461 on the server
@@telosbound I'm also ethan461
Mr. Žižek, go home and read some Heidegger. :)