that isnt what he said. he said love only appears to you in a position where you can see it, and, like marxism, it is related to reason and rationality within that position. only from outside that position does it appear unreasonable.
multi-tasking isnt a thing, but multi-layered, complex thought is. if the audience put down their cell phones and learned to listen they wouldnt have a problem.
It's actually very much about Zizek...he leaps about from thought to thought in a chaotic way. It's not a sign of the complexity of ideas (which yes, are sometimes complex) but how they're presented, so I don't blame anyone for letting their minds wander after hours of this intellectual wildman performance
I think I remember a Q&A with Sophie Fiennes complaining about how undisciplined his speeches were when making the Pervert's Guide films that she had to be very controlling and cut him off a lot - why assume this is about me?
Psychologist Marshall Rosenberg is a proponent of "non violent communication". When someone asks, "Do you love me?" he considers this violent communication because the question always arises from a place of insecurity or a means of manipulation. I don't want to get into object relations and personality disorders to clarify that. To whom it is being asked is being put on the defensive or compelled to rationalize and provide reasons which will never emotionally connect. He proposes to answer in effect, "Are you asking if I have warm and endearing feelings towards you now? Not right now. Ask me again later."
I don't always agree with Zizek or fully understand him, but he often drops a succinct insight even in a tangent (the digression on love in this video) that changes how I think about an event in my life.
I haven't caught up with all the videos on this channel yet, but if you haven't posted it already, do you have any of footage him talking about 'negating the negation' to escape capitalist ideology? I can't figure it out enough to see how it could apply.
So hysteria is irrational because it's a question by interpellation which offers no rational answer and forces a doubt on the self so subjectivity happens, oppositely, perversions have clear reasons behind them and behave as power structures. He also suggests that Marxism is irrational as love and dogmatic as a religion lol.
Perversions are irrational as well, dogmatic belief in their own reasoning does not make one rational. Meanwhile, perverts strive to maintain the status quo, while hysterics are subversive as they question why.
no, hysteria is an irrational, base version of a rational response that can only be understood or seen as reasonable by those within the system/situation. aliens come and you get hysterical can be considered irrational, but it is more rational than can be understood by those outside that situation. similarly, when you are in love or a marxist, you can be considered a pervert or a hysteric by those outside that system/set of experiences.
@@jc6226 you're misunderstanding the terms "hysteria" and "perversion", they're specialized terms used in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis with specific meaning. I suggest you listen to Zizek's talk again to fully understand the meanings of these words used in this specific context.
Why do you love me, depends who's asking. There's more about that joke, young woman can never love her old husband like that daddy loves his cutty. One more. Old man tells his young wife, don't get hysteric on me baby, it's me who's old. And she reply to him, i know, you pervert, i'am doing this only for your money.
If you want to get Zizek's 'I WOULD PREFER NOT TO' t-shirt you can do so here:
i-would-prefer-not-to.com
His point about love is marvelous. Love is transcends reason. A rational explanation turns it into a simple desire to own.
yeah. i also liked his point that the rational explanations that causes one to fall in love is caused after the act of falling in love
that isnt what he said. he said love only appears to you in a position where you can see it, and, like marxism, it is related to reason and rationality within that position. only from outside that position does it appear unreasonable.
I love how he forces along his train of thought and the audience have long given up
I can follow his train of thought and write comments at the same time. All I have to do is watch it 3 times.
multi-tasking isnt a thing, but multi-layered, complex thought is. if the audience put down their cell phones and learned to listen they wouldnt have a problem.
It's actually very much about Zizek...he leaps about from thought to thought in a chaotic way. It's not a sign of the complexity of ideas (which yes, are sometimes complex) but how they're presented, so I don't blame anyone for letting their minds wander after hours of this intellectual wildman performance
lmao stop projecting yourself onto the audience
I think I remember a Q&A with Sophie Fiennes complaining about how undisciplined his speeches were when making the Pervert's Guide films that she had to be very controlling and cut him off a lot - why assume this is about me?
„What‘s in that name? Am I that name and so on and so in…“ -The old Juliet, Shakespeare
You will remain yourself, Zizek! And you will speak freely!
Zizek cosplaying Freddy Krueger
A nightmarish vision
Hysteria, perversion?
Sounds like a party.
Psychologist Marshall Rosenberg is a proponent of "non violent communication". When someone asks, "Do you love me?" he considers this violent communication because the question always arises from a place of insecurity or a means of manipulation. I don't want to get into object relations and personality disorders to clarify that. To whom it is being asked is being put on the defensive or compelled to rationalize and provide reasons which will never emotionally connect.
He proposes to answer in effect, "Are you asking if I have warm and endearing feelings towards you now? Not right now. Ask me again later."
I don't always agree with Zizek or fully understand him, but he often drops a succinct insight even in a tangent (the digression on love in this video) that changes how I think about an event in my life.
Zizek against perversion? 😮 Top 10 anime betrays 😢
Zizek is a gateway for my arguments against Freud in psychology 101
Maha, are u lebanese?
Maha, are you an indian?
maha are you a pervert
Maha, are you crazy?
Why against Freud tho?
Can always count on the comment section of a Zizek video to be completely useless.
@Pecker Dúnlaing Space Dolphin Brigada Lol defensive
Because no one understands what the hell he is babbling and free associating about while playing with his nose, and sniffing.
@@goingmonotheist783 idiot
I tried to fix that , you Orgo pervert.
@@igormihov6279
Well now genius..
Explain in one paragraph.. use your heaveist terms and most complicated concepts too.. Go ahead 🍿
Zizek dresses like my dad
zizek dresses *like me* *FUCK*
I am still 18 I shouldn't be dressing like a dad
Is your Dad named Freddy Krueger?
I haven't caught up with all the videos on this channel yet, but if you haven't posted it already, do you have any of footage him talking about 'negating the negation' to escape capitalist ideology? I can't figure it out enough to see how it could apply.
Meaning sprouts from feeling not understanding
That is pure ideology & so on & so on
if you have reasons to love someone, you dont love them
This was a very interesting talks, lots of good ideas, I should be a good student and watch it again sometimes later
Pure gold.
Where was this taken from??
He has the same top as chris chan in this video and all I can think of is an alternate univers where they are swipped.
source?
So hysteria is irrational because it's a question by interpellation which offers no rational answer and forces a doubt on the self so subjectivity happens, oppositely, perversions have clear reasons behind them and behave as power structures. He also suggests that Marxism is irrational as love and dogmatic as a religion lol.
Perversions are irrational as well, dogmatic belief in their own reasoning does not make one rational. Meanwhile, perverts strive to maintain the status quo, while hysterics are subversive as they question why.
no, hysteria is an irrational, base version of a rational response that can only be understood or seen as reasonable by those within the system/situation. aliens come and you get hysterical can be considered irrational, but it is more rational than can be understood by those outside that situation. similarly, when you are in love or a marxist, you can be considered a pervert or a hysteric by those outside that system/set of experiences.
@@jc6226 you're misunderstanding the terms "hysteria" and "perversion", they're specialized terms used in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis with specific meaning. I suggest you listen to Zizek's talk again to fully understand the meanings of these words used in this specific context.
the sniffing snorting and face touching puts ozzy ozborne to shame
Why do you love me, depends who's asking.
There's more about that joke, young woman can never love her old husband like that daddy loves his cutty.
One more. Old man tells his young wife, don't get hysteric on me baby, it's me who's old. And she reply to him, i know, you pervert, i'am doing this only for your money.
Drinking game: take a shot everytime he touches his nose.
i tried that and i woke up arrested for drunk and disorderly communism
alcohol poisioning
death drive
He talks and sniff too much please stick to writing!