Russian "Terminator" Heavy Armored Fighting Vehicle
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лют 2024
- New shorts each and every day. Hit subscribe if you enjoy our content!
#army #military #navy #usarmy #usmilitary #usnavy #ukraine #militarytraining #veterans #marines #marinecorps #navyseals #specialforces - Розваги
Imagine War Thunder added this
Yes
2s38 but even worse
And the the armata . . . And the 57 . . . And only then will the us tree get the f 35 ( Not The 22 because it is “ unfair “ )
It'd be comparable to any apc in the game but a lot more survivable
@@tankdood329 Since when is the 2s38 a bad technique? That thing literally keeps aviation alive, it's been around long before the strela was moved to 10.0.
It's actually classified as a Tank Support Vehicle
😂😂😂Doesn't help in Ukraine?
@@dmytrogazhur3382how original
@@dmytrogazhur3382Помогает так что Украина скоро потеряет и Авдеевку😂🎉
@@user-yc6pl7eb1n За три дні?😁
@@dmytrogazhur3382 медленно еб#те? 😂😂😂
You didn't mention the 2 AGS-40 grenade launchers.
Only the prototype version had them
@@purplenurp5590no they are still present
@purplenurp5590 I think someone forgot to tell the production crew, of the 2000 or so individual photographs of the Terminator online, only 3 appear to not have the grenade launchers fitted. Even the two shown to have been destroyed by Ukraine had grenade launchers.
@@stuartthornton3027ukraine destroyed none
Just damaged 2 but they got repaired
@alebattle1 yeah repaired by Ukraine
This wasn’t made to replace the BMP, this was made to be a new concept of a support vehicle
Yeah, surprised that they were able to fit any extra infantry inside it though, somewhat similar in role i guess
The original idea was that it should act together with tanks, providing cover and fire support replacing the infantry, which supposed to support tanks and cover them from enemy infantry in classic tactics.
The idea is to have many since many will be destroyed.
Can’t Wait for Gaijin to put this at 2.7
Nah, it will be a 8.0 premuim vehicle. Perfectly balanced.
New squadron vehicle 9.7 seems balanced
Test it vs brad
10.7, expecting it with thermals.
Nah, 27.0 is too high, it'd fit comfy at 2.3
A lot of people dont understand that drones with explosives can destroy anything, not just Russian tanks in particular.
Shhhhh you're going to alert the guys with dog pictures on their profile
They can, but not having the ammunition or fuel isolated from the crew has proved incredibly deadly in this war.
All it takes is the smallest HEAT warhead to penetrate the thin roof armor and ignite the fuel or ammo, and that can lead to the vehicle being lost due to an instant explosion.
We've seen this happen in the war to the most modern tanks like T-90M (explosion launched commander out of hatch over 150 feet into the air while also tossing turret despite having "protected" autoloader and no spare ammunition in the hull), Challenger 2 also similairly had turret blown off because of hit by drone or ATGM to propellant charge storage (was not recorded like T-90M destruction, so real cause can only be speculated), along with Leopard 2 which was knocked out after hit to the side caused fuel from the side sponson tanks to ignite and enter the crew compartment (not a complete destruction like we have seen in Turkey when Turkish Leopard 2A4's hull ammunition stowage is hit, but still.).
Russian tanks in particular tend to throw their turrets though
@@sierra5360 I saw how high Abrams turret can fly on Telegram channel yesterday. XD
@@sierra5360Ukrainian ones drive away with fear
First they laughed about the "cope cages" . Now everyone uses them
People laughed at how shitty they were, not the fact that they were used.
They laughed because they DON'T WORK 😆
@@corychallice7705 Except when they do, you know what doesn't work tho? funding a proxy war on the other side of the globe
@@corychallice7705 if they didn't work, why everyone else uses them?
@@corychallice7705Your failure to understand how simple concepts work is pretty impressive, especially given we've seen evidence of them working.
Fun fact, those cannons have no ability to switch ammo type, so you need to either run mixed belts or one gun with APDS and one with HEF rounds if you want it to be able to engage both infantry and armor.
Hear me out
You can literally see this thing have a stabilizer, open your eyes
a stabilizer isnt able to swap ammo, only stabilize the turret while the chassy moves@@SomeOne-ph1gw
@@SomeOne-ph1gw his comment didn’t talk about the stabilizer… what are you on about?
4 Atgms do the job fine I think. It’s designed to fight infantry mostly anyway
Russia developed it not because BMP is too fragile, where did you even get that? It was developed for tank support in urban scenarios where tanks are much more vulnerable. Do your homework before spreading bullshit, give Russian weapons its due diligence, since they're feeding you. Do better.
And yet you provided nothing but your opinion. Do better.
@@chrisrodriguez388 My opinion? Dummy it's in the name- BMPT Terminator, it has nothing to do with BMP which stands for Boyevaya Machina Pehoty (Infantry combat vehicle) and BMPT- Boyevaya Machina Podderzhki Tankov- Tank Support Combat Vehicle. You dumbass lol.
Due diligence? Lol. The terminator is a 1 truck pony and was a panic design after Russia lost an armored brigade in grozny. Half of them have been knocked out in Ukraine and they've been withdrawn from Ukraine
@@chrisrodriguez388 I cannot believe it. *_But YOU just did the same._*
@@E.V.A.N-COProductions I can’t believe it. *But YOU just did the same without any merit!!!*
Try again, sparky.
The Bmp-T uses the Kornet atgm's I'm pretty sure while the Bmp-T72 uses the ataka atgm's
(Edit) I was mistaken about the Kornet atgm
There is no BMPT with kornet.
Difference between BMPT 1 and 2 is 2 30mm AGS grenade launchers. And bmpt 2 is for export.
BMPT 1 without armor on ATGM is a prototype.
@Niko_rj Ah yeah after going back I see that now thanks for the respectful correction
@@Niko_rj I’m pretty sure there are modifications of the BMPT with kornet atgm
@@exe.wifinowhere3942 nope, such BMPT doesn't exist.
@@Niko_rj idk man where are you looking, but there are modifications with kornet
My fav next to that Finnish powerboat! Thanks for featuring this!
Finnish powerboat?
@@yourcasualfinn2213 Even the Finnish doesn't know about their boat
@@OnGuardYT Im asking which one
@@yourcasualfinn2213 Cool
Could you imagine sitting up front when that gun is blasting rounds right next to you
Gaijin: So, it's gonna be a 10.0, right? No?
10.3, take it or leave it.
Little American boi crying ‘bout Russian bias🤡🤡
@@redcrayfish7870but it is bias?
@@barteqt no, Russian tanks are mid, don’t even told me, Leo 2A7 and Strv-122B+ are bias
@@redcrayfish7870 mid tier russian tanks are absolute bias
Why the cannons sound like legos?
Russia stuff sucks
@@ryan19876But BMPT Terminator does not, infact experts believe that new Russian Military hardware like BMPT Terminator and T-14 Armata are indeed real deal.
@ryang3709 lots of Russian gear kind of sucks but the BMP-T is not one of them
@@ryan19876 Yeah they suck so much that when Russia unveiled their next gen tank and tank support vehicle, the western nations started projects to improve their own tanks.
@@ryan19876i want to taste the same crap you are on 😂
Meanwhile a drone comeing out of no wear strapped with a C4
Russian Androids: Noooo our tanks are invincible and we have no losses🤬 Everything is going according to the plan!!🤬🤬 wEsTeRn pRoPaGaNdA !!!1!!!111
Cage on top: we dont do that here
@@militaristaustrianHIMARS: Nuh Uh, Get your Cope Cages outta here!!
@@darkcasterpunkzero7870lancet grining: UNO REVERSE
@@militaristaustrian Patriot Missile Systems:
Tsk Tsk.
Think this is the future of armor and not regular tanks.
It actually proved itself many times in the Ukrainian war, great support vehicle
When it entered the field, a few got destroyed and immediately withdrawn from combat?
@@protostryke6031 ua-cam.com/video/zvj70cMU8LM/v-deo.html
@@protostryke6031 Cherrypicker 😂😂
@@protostryke6031Zelenski told you tha 😂
@@protostryke6031Клоун, ни один терминатор не был уничтожен или захвачен.
He didnt mention the grenade launchers on the early model...
To everyone talking about the barrels shaking making it inaccurate, i implore you to search up a video of it firing tracer rounds and see how straight it is lmao
Looks strait is not enough for war
@@vladimirzaika3594 what....
@@vladimirzaika3594 lmao you don't need that much accuracy for 30 mm. If your target is a tank/afv/apc then the accuracy is enough for such big target. If your target is infantry 30 mm will take care of that just fine. You dont need a direct hit.
Yes, except no. Since the gas from the barrels goes right to the other barrel because of the muzzlebrake, the barrel shakes, which diverts the rounds fired from both barrels, which increases inaccuracy but also brings a whole load of problems to the tank itself, a barrel shaking like that will damage the tank.
@@Glengarry_ you're talking out your arse. Stop with all the hypothetical talk. You don't KNOW this is happening. You cant see the rounds, but if you would actually decide to use this platform and search up BMPT firing tracers, you will literally see how straight it is. So stop with the cope "muh barrel gasses" and actually look at the truth.
This is gonna be the 11br bmp
People mocking the barrels shaking dont realise this is intended.
With such a vehicle, you need a very wide volume of fire to suppress everything in your general direction.
Thats why it has two firing modes, the slow ROF is when you need precise fire.
The high ROF is perfect for urban combat.
Calling poor design choices
Intentional is quite the bold claim, I must say. Was the commander having such poor situational awareness that he has to sit on the top in urban operations intentional as well?
@@braith117If you look at tracers of this thing you'll see how accurate it is
@@okand1921exactly
@@braith117 From a general perspective, this looks pretty damn accurate
ua-cam.com/video/RXNLXgdjLUQ/v-deo.html
@@braith117Ignorance at it finest. People like you always yapping just because you don't like the truth
"Basement child, we need this NOW"
Gaijan
Firing rate of 300 to 500 rounds per minute? GAU 8 : Hold my beer.
Is the cope cage included on this?
I think it's for drone's. Both sides seem to use it
yes, ukrainians and nato mercs use it on their vehicles, so it must be effecive
Yeah Israeli merkavas who's operators piss themselves got them.
@@kv-2156😂😂😂😂
Merkava has trophy and ebemys stupied enough to prove it works. @@kv-2156
Gaijin: Perfect for 10.9
wth is gainajin and 10.9
You dare insult the BR gods ?@@sturmmorser_on_blitz
@@cideltacommand7169 wth is br god
@@sturmmorser_on_blitz The holy gajin shall decide your game
@@cideltacommand7169 what
Thanks for taking the time to comment on this. I like to hear from people around the world, people who are there and see with their own eyes what's really going on!
My country really requires this
Even russian army don't want this shit. Your country doesn't need it too.
look how inaccurate those autocannons become as soon as it starts firing... shaking around like an inflatable man at a car dealership. i can see why they're no good
how do you know its inaccurate exactly? there doesnt seem to be any excessive shaking here, also these are 30 mm rounds with up to 800 rounds per minute, i would love to see something be completely still while experiencing that kind of recoil
@@leight420 its about the wiggle i operated an flab kan 63/12 35mm twinflak and the muzzle break is x shaped so the gasses pass diagonal to the other barrle basically no wiggle and again its 35mm full auto 22 shots in 1.2 seconds and that system is from 1963 so yeah the terminator is just bad engeneering
Internet specialists 😅
@@olivermeyer2933 do you really thing that one of the most technologically advanced country in the world cant replicate 60s tech? there has to be more to this i really doubt that is the case. How in the world could they have the best ICBMs and hypersonic missiles without being able to make a gun?
@@leight420 well as i said the muzzle break holes are parralel with the gasses venting out side ways it pushes the other bartle to the side and a 1mm wiggle can mean that u miss a target by a few meters further out. Its bad placent of the muzzle breaks just install en x muzzle break and ur fine bur if it fails on that little thing indont wanna how the complex shit is doing. Russia aint one of the most technologically advanced countrys not by a longshot russia expirenced braindrain a lot they have man power but "skilled" man power like electrival engeeniers and programers which are needed for the development of new systems
non stabilised guns which means if you fire both you will be shooting so badly you wouldn't hit a full size barn.
put it a motion and forget it!
Brother how tf are these guns not stabilised 😂 ya'all making just shit up now
@@kuunoooo7293 It is true
@@vladyslavoliinyk6722 lol you just made shit up
@@Kroq_Gar
1. Ты троль созданный 14.05.22 когда рашисты создавали фейковые аккаунты чтобы коментировать войну извращая правду ! ?
2. Я привел ФАКТЫ которые по одному можно опровергнуть - но ты их НИ ОДНОГО не опроверг , просто написав бред .
Что еще раз подтверждает что ты не ищешь истину - а брешешь в пользу террористов и оккупантов .
They saw us kicking ass with the Bradley and tried to one up us with twice the guns and twice the missles i swear to god 😂
And actual armour
Notice how the muzzle breaks are pointed towards eachother, that's why the barrels shake so much when firing... not a great design but looks very cool like most russian vehicles
Zombie killing tank
There is one weakness which is the gun itself. Because the turret has no defense against enemies. They can destroy the turret, leaving it unable to fight
"We heard the tankers hated enemy infantry so we came up with a solution comrade"
You gotta admit Russians and Chinese army vehicle's look futuristic as fck, especially the concept of chinese aircrafts those thing looks like they were meant to fight for space!
@raf_12 yeah like lcs ships built without a safety factor because muh infallibility right? Much futuristic
Yeah they look futuristic but function 20 years behind
@raf_12 yeah that's what I was saying american equipment is better
@@caspersfi Yet we only have seen "modern" western weapons fighting against goat herders.
@@Mercnix101 even our old stuff works on russia
Yeah, too bad the barrels vibrate horrifically making the thing less accurate than a drunk gunman using a musket.
how is it that innacurate
@@soap_off It was mostly for flair, but it's pretty bad.
Watch a video of the thing firing and pay attention to the barrels. They get bounced around rapidly due to the close proximity of the two guns.
@@panzerlite8108 BMP-2 with single barrel is almost as innacurate as the BMPT, the barrel shake is due to high rate of fire
@@soap_off The second barrel makes it worse
@@panzerlite8108For infantry, that is more than enough, there is no need for absolute accuracy like tank gun, if you need absolute accuracy and complete destruction, you have ATGM.
I wish Squad would add this vehicle, those dual auto-cannons are vicious.
They better not add this to war thunder
Рашисты пол года назад привезли их для штурма леса возле Кременной .
В комментариях руские радовались что украинским воинам конец .
Но после поражения нескольких из них и убедившись в их полной бесполезности и несоответствии требованиям эти "Терминаторы" исчезли из новостей вроде их и не было .
Последний раз "Терминатора" показали где-то месяц назад когда он прикрывая штурм позиции вел огонь по окопу с расстояния 100 метров . Это и есть его эффективная дальность.
После попадания в него дрона он разлетелся на кусочки от мощнейшего взрыва боекомплекта .
Вот такая история у этого и ВСЕГО другого чудо оружия рашистов , которые при проверке оказываются сильно переоценены .
?
А чё ты на русском великом расхрюкался 😂
@@VidandRico?
@@foker747mr4
А шо такое андрофаг ?
По теме НЕЧЕГО возразить - решил как все нелюди просто гавкнуть ?
По узки ведь это ГАВ-арить ?
@@foker747mr4
К тому же в "великом" узком славянских слов не так уж и много - там смесь болгарского , финно-угрского и тюркского с немалой долей немецкого ,французского и английского .
А в словаре великого УКРАИНСКОГО почти в два раза больше слов чем в изыке андрофагов которым немецкие цари сочиняли "великую" историю и изык в 18-19 веках .
So the reason were not seeing many of these in the feild today is that when they were feilded, they fell under heavy shelling and I think 2 were damaged and one disabled or something like that and they didn't prove effective in combat I don't think
There's hardly any battlefield footage of this thing because it's an experimental vehicle. And so far it has not been put into mass production. And secondly, there is not a single frame where this car was damaged or destroyed.
@ancientsnake3393 this is just what I heard based on train cart footage of them being transported and Ukrainian sources, they all of them were in the same unit according to those sources too
Any vehicle will be damaged by drones and artillery it's just war
There are a lot of shots on the battlefield, you also have shots where they are hit by several fpv drones and survive the hits!@@ancientsnake3393
There is newer footage of them being used in bakhmut and the serebriyanskiy forest. So yeah, they're effective. There's just not many of them.
This is just 2S38 but multiplied itself by 100x 💀
Yes, brilliant idea. Let's make an ifv nearly the same tonnage as an MBT that won't be fuel hungry and cause supply chain issues
90% комментариев это люди-боты, работающие за деньги, цель одна во всех видео писать негативные комментарии. На Украине на сайтах по трудоустройству десятки данных вакансий. Последние из них были , чтобы писать негатив под интервью Карлсона.
Bruh, you're the fucking bot. We can see your post history 💀💀💀
I do it for entertainments
The cannon recoil shakes the other cannon making the accuracy beyond shit
I think only one cannon fires at a time
People still buying into this cope is absolutely wild
So if thats the case then how come when it fires tracer rounds its completely straight
@@spidersaremean8917 That's not straight
You may not be hit but it will still kill you
WTF kinda TERMINATOR 2 BULLETS were those they were loading in that Tank.
do you know how to count
Fun fact bmpt is more commonly used as a MBT support vehicule.😮
Ukrainian drones loves to flip that turret into the air😂😂
dumbest comment ive read all day
clown
POV: You don't know sh*t
An Russian Equipment for a Ukrainian City and lands fair trade
Didn't the Ukrainian already took one out on its first deployment in Ukraine?
Yeah, a abandoned one got targeted by special Artillery.
After 1 year being used in ukraine they lost just 1 (visually confirmed).
You do realize no weapon is indestructible?
@@categories5066all American vehicles are indestructible. Until one gets destroyed, that's when they say all vehicles can be destroyed
There is not a single frame where this car was damaged or destroyed.
They have like 12 of these, if they had more it would be very scary thing in urban warfare
That is the only ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE we need nothing above or below it
Now that’s a lot of damage
To the budget only
@@vladimirzaika3594 How BBC doing?
The whole thing sounds like something a middle schooler dreamed up. Not only does putting it on a tank chassis mean it's less mobile, but it's now also prone to being immobilized in urban warfare by a well place explosive or anti-tank rocket to the tracks. I've also heard the turret has very thin armor, so the entire weapon system is prone to being knocked out by anti armor weapons, which defeats the point of having a system thats supposed to help tanks against infantry.
What you said are valid points, but you should see this thing in action. Theres footage of one spraying down a forest. No one is getting close when this thing is putting down fire. Theres a reason why Ukraine is also using SPAAs in IFV roles, there are merits to firing thousands of cannon rounds down range despite being lightly armored or sluggish
@@DrSabot-A😂 Your comment didn’t age well, also it doesn’t matter if it sprayed the forest what matters is that both cannons aren’t aligned which means it can’t hit shit accurately
@@wppz7691did i miss somthig in the past 3 days?
Какие городские условия, это машина поддержки танков!!! И экипаж в данном корпусе шасси максимально защищен, необитаемый верх машины лучшее решение для всех видов танков будущего.
you did forgot that it a tank chasis wich all so means it eats up as much fuel as all of russain tanks and vehicles with the v2 engian an engian made in 1940 being used now.
No way i just heard lego sound
It loads like a lawn mower! Haha
A-10 Warthog has entered the conversation
Pantsir says hi
@@crimson7554what the hec is a pantsir? Are you talking about a panzer?
@@save7597 Mf you never heard of Russian Self-propelled anti-aircraft weapon Pantsir-S1 and S2?
@@save7597pantsir s1 medium to short air defense system
Su-27 Joined The party
Looks like good decorations for the Ukraine farm fields
Looks like ukraine farm fields are nonexistent
Perfect vehicle for home defence
This was, is what you should say lmao
It even has a turet eject button.
ua-cam.com/video/zvj70cMU8LM/v-deo.html
Hein-?Nah, bruh.
It has dual autocannons as it's primary weapon. It doesn't even carry that kind of shells, that can explode upon penetration.
Every vehicle has a turret eject button bob the western propaganda consumer
@OnGuardYT virgin learn before posting what you don't know lol
@@OnGuardYTyes
Bradley has entered the chat
The BMPT is a lot more advanced than a Bradley lmao what's this cope?
@@p_filippouzno 😂. U only think that bc ur stupid brain sees all these weapon systems 😂
@@p_filippouzLmao. And what does that have to do with the fact that a vehicle that’s old dominated the battlefield against Russian TANKS. Where’s the cope? 😂😂😂 Keep trying, commie simp.
@@p_filippouz Give him a Lancet treatment
@@p_filippouzIt's really not.
If they offset the muzzles just a tinny bit it'll solve the ridiculous barrel shake making it actually accurate dont tell the Ruski's tho
Мы прчитали тебя, спасибо военный инженер 😂😂😂
Russian engineers are not idiots bro, they know what they're doing
@@OnGuardYT Of course they know, design bureaus work there. At the front, every soldier is obliged to write comments on weapons and send comments to the factory through the command. In Russia, everything is built on the military principle. Even in our hospital, citizens are required to fill out work notes.
You do realize that the 2A42 just shakes like that regardless?
ua-cam.com/video/jBnuNN5ubSE/v-deo.htmlfeature=shared
Morons like you in the comment section think you're so smart, huh?
This is the real terminator not the Hollywood one 😂
India will buy it's latest version
Lol gl with that these things didnt last 5 minutes in the feild in ukrain
@@rowanmelrose4600eat 3 fpv and more and............still alive. U say what????
@@blackgalaxy901Another russian junk of epic proportions
The Indians aren't buying this thing
@@mpondachongo1138 We probably will buy it
Crazy to think it can be killed with a drone for under a grand
Any tank can be killed with a drone under a grand
@@FudgeOnMethat’s the whole concept of the comment. Congrats. 🥴
you say that as if most tanks are ammune to a bomb being dropped on their roof
@@chrisrodriguez388 idk what you’re trying to say here, but your IQ seems very low
Some say it's meh, others it's great but for me, all i wanna say is "I don't want to be the poor grunt at the receiving end of those two autocannons"😅
Russians seem to have a thing for dual auto cannons
It reminds me of the Colonial Marines APC in the old Aliens movies 🔥
Вас бы туда на один день комментаторы , что бы из вас вышло всё дерьмо при виде любой техники что стреляет по вам.
Look, I don't care how a gun is engineered or how often it jams if I'm bleeding out from getting shot by it.
Those muzzle brakes really fuck over the accuracy as soon as it starts shooting
Not the breaks, its the amount of guns and how close together they are. 30mm is a lot of power to have sitting a foot apart.
Russian Bradley but would probably get clapped by the Bradley
More armored with more anti tank missiles
@@hellgates_javed6451 Bradleys that are actually in the theatre of war. This is just another ruskie wet dream, like the t-14. Good for parades, not much else.
Both will clap each other
@@hellgates_javed6451 more over-engineering with more government/military corruption. But because it’s Russian-made, it’s gotta be better, right?
No.... The Russian Bradley is The BMP series....
…”built on the explosive paper chassis of the…”
No flight time for turret inhabitants. Such an overlook. I thought all Russian tank crew members were hoping for some time in the air.
Turns into a helluva slag heap too.
Javelin is typing......
Lancet is typing...
@@arcroyal1258you mean flying
@@mitri5389 flying towards his ass
Look at that fking barrel jiggling, they don't even bother to rotate the muzzle 45° degree to face up and down. Truly one of russia's vehicle of all time
У старой версии Омского завода пушки не тряслись так , как у этой версии УВЗ
What a joke😂
Avdiivka... You don't get it 😂
I remember this was the top tier “tank” for the Chimera faction in Act of Aggression. Can shoot down helicopters and intercept middles too
The gas from shooting is pushing and moving the barrels I don’t understand how they haven’t fixed that
It dosent affect accuracy that much when ur firing at that rpm
It got absolutely wrecked in Ukraine. I think they sent 13 of them and lost 9 or so in a matter of days.
source: trust me bro
ua-cam.com/video/zvj70cMU8LM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/9D8LlZALj_g/v-deo.html
@@sebastianschmidt7268
ua-cam.com/video/aG2VNYdH9Ow/v-deo.html
@@sebastianschmidt7268
ua-cam.com/video/a1v0dkh7dtc/v-deo.html@@sebastianschmidt7268
BS ruSSian propaganda!
Cry about it bozo 🤡
Cry ukro bot
@@categories5066 🤣🤣🤣
How the fuck is this Russian propoganda?
“Anything that doesn’t fit my narrative is propaganda”
7.3 material🔥🔥🔥
All of them were destroyed in Ukraine in just one engagement. Russian general said they were junk..
Except there incompetent fighters weak af😮😅😅😅😅😅
What makes you say that dumbass
Nope, it's called spam level 1 infantry
Aptly named. Looks menacing. American troops would scrape this thing off a battlefield before they knew what hit em!
Nope
This thing probably takes years to load every gun belt
Looks like something from gta v online
I think we never see it as it has terriblr accuracy and has a very high profile
Now is Terminated 😅
actually the terminator has two automatic grenade launchers as well
Umm the terminator 2 does not use ataka missles it uses the Kornet missles. And does not replace the BMP it is an infantry support vehicle to provide fire power support to infantry assault units
It's actually the only tank that goes badaboom and not pop its top it just blows up normal 😂
This “was” the Russian bmt terminator
all those specs just to be destroyed by an improvised drone from alibaba
I think the Russian engineers were playing the original Halo when they created this tank. Mini-scorpion. 😅
The face of the infantry was presented🗿 After meeting such a technique
No tanks left but the dream 😴 of the battle of Kursk is still alive - in a nightmare
I wonder how effective those "terminators" are in the frontlines of Ukraine.
American tank: The Genderless two moms T22. The only problem with this tank is when you miss gender the tank it stops and goes into fault.
Yeah, you know sis can’t be talking shit anymore because if Russia has these armaments and they’re not sending them out into battle, then we really don’t know what we’re in for
Приглашаем всех в Россию в парк Патриот😂😂😂