In one of his last letters he tells a friend he is Umberto of Italy and the son of Umberto. He realized what a physical version of the Eternal Recurrence actually entails: everything and everyone becomes everyone and everything else. And that an infinite number of times down to the minutest variation. Therefore lack of meaning, intrinsic cosmic nihilism, was a nihilism of utterly inescapable necessity...
@@ThomasMayer123-f8f Well, you certainly don't have the moral high ground by falsely accusing him of lying, do you? As I said, his remark is true: obeying the biblical injunction to 100% avoid acts of fornication yields an extreme if not total unlikekihood of contracting syphilis. That's just a fact. It's a fact whether he, or you, or I are religious people or even whether God exists or not. That's just obvious. I asked you which part of what he said wasn't true, and your answer was "everything." But your own irrational vindictiveness melted your brain down into stating falsities both nonfactual and illogical. What if he'd said, "One should never visit whorehouses without prophylactics"? Is that trying to take "the moral high ground"? Yet it is just as factual in terms of teleological causation. Compris?
Awesome presentation. Good work!
In one of his last letters he tells a friend he is Umberto of Italy and the son of Umberto.
He realized what a physical version of the Eternal Recurrence actually entails: everything and everyone becomes everyone and everything else. And that an infinite number of times down to the minutest variation.
Therefore lack of meaning, intrinsic cosmic nihilism, was a nihilism of utterly inescapable necessity...
Syphilis makes mad. You get syphilis if you do the stuff against the 6th commandment...
Here comes the bible riders again...🥱
They don't think he contracted that
@@ThomasMayer123-f8f.What did he say that isn't true!?😅
@@James-ll3jb everything. religious people always think they have the moral highground
@@ThomasMayer123-f8f Well, you certainly don't have the moral high ground by falsely accusing him of lying, do you? As I said, his remark is true: obeying the biblical injunction to 100% avoid acts of fornication yields an extreme if not total unlikekihood of contracting syphilis. That's just a fact. It's a fact whether he, or you, or I are religious people or even whether God exists or not. That's just obvious.
I asked you which part of what he said wasn't true, and your answer was "everything." But your own irrational vindictiveness melted your brain down into stating falsities both nonfactual and illogical.
What if he'd said, "One should never visit whorehouses without prophylactics"? Is that trying to take "the moral high ground"? Yet it is just as factual in terms of teleological causation.
Compris?
It's pronounced "Ri-Kard" "Vagner". There is no "ch" sound in the German language.
1887 ? No ...,