because european leagues have gotten much much better this century. south american still produces some of the greatest players ever. but its much harder for south america to win a wc when you only have 3 world class teams as oposed to 8 from europe.
@@80srocknroller You mean South America? The clubs' stars are being drained by Europe since 1995 when the EU passed a Law that banned quotas on foreign players, so European top teams started importing more and more better players, which increased the gap between rich and poor clubs more and more(as you can see later in the graph in the video, the disparity of Elo between teams just increased) As for National teams, it's mostly the advantage of Europe having a lot of great teams playing the World Cup combined with the fact that Uruguay hasn't managed to create many stars and Brazil didn't manage to have good coaches since then.
large population and a lot in extreme poverty, football is a cheap sport to play outside for hours with your friends its also a real and one of the few ways to get out of poverty. all but a few of the brazilian professional players come from extreme poverty
Please don’t say North America. They are very bad 😂 and are no match for European countries. Maybe Ukraine or Russia, but come against England, Germany or Italy. Finished
So basically different countries have different styles of play, and they exchange it with each other in Champions League
2006 Italy
2010 Spain
2014 Germany
2018 France
That's why Europe has dominated in the past 4 World Cups
because european leagues have gotten much much better this century. south american still produces some of the greatest players ever. but its much harder for south america to win a wc when you only have 3 world class teams as oposed to 8 from europe.
@@martinayala9110 And what happened to the teams of America?
@@80srocknroller they slightly declined unfortunatley. but i think this wc we can see one of them make the finals
And again italy
@@80srocknroller
You mean South America?
The clubs' stars are being drained by Europe since 1995 when the EU passed a Law that banned quotas on foreign players, so European top teams started importing more and more better players, which increased the gap between rich and poor clubs more and more(as you can see later in the graph in the video, the disparity of Elo between teams just increased)
As for National teams, it's mostly the advantage of Europe having a lot of great teams playing the World Cup combined with the fact that Uruguay hasn't managed to create many stars and Brazil didn't manage to have good coaches since then.
The quick counter, yes! That😢 was my mainstay as a footballer back in the day
Spain and Italy are in southern Europe 😂😂
France only started winning after immigrants dominated the talent pool/team rosters.
But still, their talents were developed in France. Would they be this great if their talents were developed in Africa?
western Europe is not just dominsting football in Europe, they domiating anything in europe
At this point, you should just make a video about why Western Europe dominates the world
C'mon Italian football .. and Hungary is long due something. But it's not going to happen is it.
European football clubs india industrials full collaboration I think have to good
India 🇮🇳 sports all come
They have more and better African migrants. Simple.
And if we boycott maybe the monsters will stop bombing for greedy bankers who own athletes!
Maybe , but they have great teams and form player well
france yes, but look at how many african migrants played for 2006,2010 and 2014 world cup winners. 1-2 to none....
All dominant players are white not to be racist but it just is same as with basketball where dark-skinned are more dominant than light skinned
Messi > Ronaldo
Very profitable business for india industriles
this has aged like milk
One world cup doesn’t change anything
@@rrrrr6478amd it was tied 😂😂
I want to know more about this, where is the full vid? 🤔
Also why is Brazil great with football? Despite its not a rich country etc...?
Favelas, brilliant place to learn skills with a football
Because they are rich with talent
Nadie lo sabe
large population and a lot in extreme poverty, football is a cheap sport to play outside for hours with your friends its also a real and one of the few ways to get out of poverty. all but a few of the brazilian professional players come from extreme poverty
@@munaali840I agree, but like the political system they have weak leaders and often the best leave for Europe or America.
European football clubs if come after rugby club come
I am inviting indian industrials investment to india football
I think big market for india
India is a shithole
2:18 Haaland and Mbappe are laughin
dude cmon now u cannot compare the level of messi with these two.
mbappe and haaland are too good but messi was a beast when he was that young
neithe player can be replaced:
Haaland & Mbapé: are we jokes to you?
They are a joke if you compare them to Messi and Ronaldo.
We a different breed from the others 🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇧🇪🇸🇪💪 vs 🇷🇺🇵🇱🇭🇺💩
Yeah okay the majority of "european" most succesfull players are imigrant descendents.
@@Edits_Panic0 That doesnt make any sense bro.... Dont take pride and say the same thing .... Europe means europe the best in everything
Poland has the best striker in the world lmao
@@Edits_Panic0 so when usa is good in something is actually Europe because they are European descendents?
pretty sure america dominates football lol but aight
Please don’t say North America. They are very bad 😂 and are no match for European countries. Maybe Ukraine or Russia, but come against England, Germany or Italy. Finished
lol US
europe is no. 1 then south america no 2. if you mean north america then you don't know your talking about
Lol they don't even play soccer get out🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That’s why they won their last wc in 2002 lol