Excellent work dudes!! Amazing that 65 years after the sinking of the Titanic a Philippines ferry packed with 4000+ passengers was allowed to sail with no lifeboats.
The sinking of the MV Wilhelm Gustloff by a soviet submarine on January 30, 1945 in the Baltic sea, was the deadliest single ship disaster in history: 9400 people died. It should be included in this narrative
Unbelievable! Yet 3 times the allotted number of passengers and a huge fiery collision would not have helped many. Such gross negligence from both vessels.
This is why I walk everywhere or just stay indoors with a big mug of tea and some biscuits, watching documentary's like these. Very interesting, tragic but interesting.
The Mount Erebus disaster didn’t kill the sheer numbers that the featured accidents did, or make an impact like the death knell for Concorde (though the pilots actually weren’t blameless) or become the deadliest air show. Antarctica stands out for different reasons. Incidentally, the KLM captain was guiltier than portrayed. The cockpit voice recorder showed he knew he was taking off without clearance (KLM were found responsible). He was worried about being stuck on Tenerife if he was delayed long enough to go “out of hours”.
The Concorde flew several years after the crash. SO THIS ACCIDENT DIDNOT END THE CONCORDE JET CAREER. Finally the cost of a ticket and jet fuel ended Concorde .
Well I think most people would agree that the crash was the beginning of the end. The economic strain was the final nail in the coffin, but exasperated by the fact that the public lost trust in that mode of travel, and did not see the benefit or what to suffer the risk to pay extra for super sonic travel. The crash of the Concorde was really what brought the era to an end.
@@cigarsgunsanddiesel8032 I definitely think that was part of it, and I do think if people wanted to take the concord they could. But they didn't want to because of the crash. At least from all the reports/documentaries I've seen.
Wonder was the very first video that caught my attention, and I love watching it. The 10 most horrifying tragedies caught my attention that I had to watch it with my family on a 65-inch TV just not to miss anything, wowed it left me speechless and sad😢
Did Concorde really fly at 6,000 metres (about 19,000 feet), some 5,500 metres (18,000 feet) lower than a 747 at that time? Molly Hager has an absolutely wondaful narration voice.
@10:12 Number 8 just breaks my heart. And I had a lot of hatred for the plane's inefficiency, opulence ,just the genuine nature of what it represented, but was amazed at it's majesty in pulling off Mach 2. But to go out in the way it did... I am sad for it, and have come to love the airplane after the event... The people aboard, of course they deserve no fault in this. I wish this had never happened,. and wish they were still here, with their families...
Number two, Tenerife air disaster was proven to be the cause of this Dutch KLM disaster as the cockpit voice recorder showed that its captain knew he was taking off without clearance. He was worried about going “out of hours” and being stuck in Tenerife overnight.
Titanic fun fact. even if it had only been 4 compartments that were compromised it still would have eventually sunk. although there was a wall in between each compartment, they didn't go all the way up to the roof. there was a decent sized Gap at the top of each wall. basically making each compartment useless. only thing the compartment would do is make it take longer to sink. this was not due to the designer and owner of the ship, nor was it due to any construction defaults. that was simply the way that compartments were built then. they were a new thing and it just hadn't dawned on anybody. kind of like airplanes, where with each crash more and more info is learned and new technology is introduced. some is vital to the safety of passengers and crew, but they need to be improved upon. that's the same thing with the compartments on the ships then.they were some of the first to have them and nobody really knew a lot about new technologie they were introducing. they knew how it worked. they just didn't have some of the small things that can lead to major catastrophes worked out. like the gaps above the walls where the pipes and wires and bulsht went through
The Concorde should still be flying with upgrades. 1 crash in 27 years!! Really?? What is the real reason she is gone?? Elon, please fix this!! It was not even her fault!!
Economics. The crash caused the fleet to be grounded at huge cost to BA and Air France and resulted in loss of confidence. Then 9/11 impacted on its primary route. It was expensive to run and incredibly noisy which limited the routes it could fly. What finally killed it was in 2003 Airbus the manufacturer of the aircraft (formerly BAC/ Aerospatiale) announced that they would no longer be providing OEM support putting the entire burden of repairs and maintenance on the only two operators of the type.
flight 123 was indeed a Boeing 747. So why show us a Boeing 737 in your video. And about the Concorde crash in Paris, that had nothing to do with a lack of power in the right engine. The fire led to such extreme high temperatures that the left side of the plane was basically consumed, including important wiring. That plane was doomed the minute the debris hit the fuel-tank. Even if they would have had two engines on the right side, they still wouldn't have made it. The tank was a design flaw, way to vulnerable.
I don't agree it was a design flaw as such. I think it was more of an oversight in design because who thinks debris will be on the runway to be hit and destroy the tire. Clearly the tank needed reinforcement but I really can't reach the design flaw conclusion.
@@JPF941 You'd be surprised how often debris is left on runways. Not to mention blowouts during landings and takes offs. For that reason alone protection of the fuel tanks should be one of the priority's of a designer. Everything that can lead to a fire during landing or take off is a risk you want to eliminate, especial if you are the designer of that plane. An extra armed plate to protect the tanks of the Concorde could have saved the lives of 109 people.
Don't forget the Sultana, a Mississippi riverboat charged with repatriating Union POW's after the Civil War ended in 1865. One night her boilers exploded and she burned and sank, killing nearly 1600 - more than the Titanic.
Winglets were still a thing of the future at the time of Tenerife. I was just reading the book the other day .. Terror at Tenerife... Written by a survivor.
I think you need to fire whoever did the research on this video. 6. The worst train wreck in history was the 2004 Sri Lanka Tsunami train wreck. 5 & 2. Listing two separate incidents as the worst plane crash in history. 1. The worst shipwreck in history was the MV Wilhelm Gustloff, which is thought to have more than double the death toll of the Dona Paz. There's also more than half a dozen other WWII ships with a higher death toll than the one in the video. If I remember correctly, Titanic doesn't even make it into the top 10 worst.
Wrong wrong. There weren’t enough boats to save the passengers of the Titannic. She had been designed to not need lifeboats. There were 3300. on board. There wasn’t capacity for 4000 in the lifeboats. Do you do any research or just guess
At 20:18 it is claimed that the Titanic was found a few Kilometers away from where she sank! I guess AI reasoned the 1st Class Passengers insisted she sail a bit further as compensation for the high Fares they paid!?
small detail but Japan Air 123 wasn't the deadliest air crash, yes for single plane but not overall , but maybe that's what it meant the deadliest total was the Tenerife
I seen that crash. It literally cut people in half legs and stomach over there chest and head over here. Children were beheaded no arms no legs. Literally makes ya sick to see all that. There are videos of it on internet. Including one that is not censored. Reason we were there my wife is Ukrainian.🇺🇦🇺🇸
Titanic is shorter than 3 football fields, 3 football fields = 300 meters. Don't mix metric and a US mislabelled sport field length as a reference in the same sentence.
The accident between PanAm and KLM on Tenerife in 1977 was not the fault of KLM but of flight control on Tenerife, in addition, the crew of the PanAm Boeing could also have decided not to go onto the runway, so these are factors and not KLM that is solely to blame for this.
The Pan Am crew were supposed to be on the runway. They were just confused on where to turn off! The Dutch pilot was 100% responsible for this. For a few reasons!
if titanic was not filled to compacity (passengers) just think about this with how many lifeboats and how they were filled how many more people would of died
Well, sorry, your video is full of wrong info and you are all over the place - for example how is the sinking of Spanish armada a disaster? IT was planned military action. If you apply same logic then Stalingrad battle was also disaster, entire WW2 was disaster and so on...Thumbs down.
@@WanderingBobAK The narration specifically calls it "one of the worst maritime disasters in history", which as they detailed it's clearly not. "Plane, Train And Ship Crashes" in the title does not match the sinking of the Spanish Armada either. It's almost certainly all "AI" generated, just like the narration.
This was a bit hit and miss IMO - lots of 'padding' and simplistic analysis. My most hated gaffe is "acrobatics". I visualise the pilot dressed in a pink leotard with matching sweatband doing Jane Fonda contortions before climbing into the aircraft.
When we innovate with technology there are risk until we refine the technology. But in some cases we are just repeating the same things over and over. We gain more knowledge and understanding on how to do things. Whether we learn from our mistakes is up to us.
Concorde was not on its way to New York. This was. Tourist flight to enable people to have a Concorde experience. The party was mainly composed of Germans. And the French wouldn’t have lost it had they lined the fuel tanks with a composite rubber which British Airways were doing. The engines had not caught fire. The fuel tank was venting fuel into the heat of the exhaust and blew out. The wing was actually on fire
The Concorde was having mostly Germans onboard. You are right about that. They were suppoost to enjoy a luxury cruise that started in New York. So New York was indeed the destination of this Concorde.
It takes you OVER 3 minutes 10 seconds into your video to get to the 1st point. Cut to the chase, 20 minutes tops. You REALLY milk the length of this video with too much bla bla bla and a lovely woman's voice does not really go with death and disasters.
Most of the time you are showing the wrong planes just to make filler......Thumbs down. Robot voice too sucks...
2 місяці тому
I fell down the stairs the other day and grazed my leg. That was a disaster of biblical proportions. I should make it into the top 10 of the next edition of great disasters.
Why do you narrate in English and then in foreign language for volume, speed and distances? It makes my viewing a WASTE of time. I'm NOT going to sit here and convert French to English or convert speed and distance to feet and miles per hour because it is the same trouble. Your target audience is not Canada because there is nobody there. No references in English ruins your video. Language applies exactly same to speed and distance as words. I have to look up what "papion" means in French for instance "butterfly" translated. I cannot see 20m? I can see 65'-7" and forget metrics better because one has to split hairs in all measuring systems. If i say 65' exactly then that would be 19,8 meters (less accurate by the way) You narrate in English and "So Should Distance Then" is my point. You can blame man in Genesis 11-9 of the Tower of babel.
This was far, far better than expected! Great narration, very good graphics, and clear, succinct descriptions! Very good video, thanks for posting!
Excellent work dudes!! Amazing that 65 years after the sinking of the Titanic a Philippines ferry packed with 4000+ passengers was allowed to sail with no lifeboats.
bot
excellent medicine to watch when trying to get over any comparatively minor disappointments in life
The sinking of the MV Wilhelm Gustloff by a soviet submarine on January 30, 1945 in the Baltic sea, was the deadliest single ship disaster in history: 9400 people died. It should be included in this narrative
Amazing that 65 years after the sinking of the Titanic a Philippines ferry packed with 4000+ passengers was allowed to sail with no lifeboats.
Unbelievable! Yet 3 times the allotted number of passengers and a huge fiery collision would not have helped many. Such gross negligence from both vessels.
bot
Ddammen the best presentation ever seen in my friking life!
You forgot the collision of two boats at Halifax during WWI which exploded and levelled the city and totally emptying the bay.
Heart-stoppingly informative. Live long and prosper.🖖😇 My condolences to those who perished.🙏
This is why I walk everywhere or just stay indoors with a big mug of tea and some biscuits, watching documentary's like these. Very interesting, tragic but interesting.
The way that first jet came in kind of level and skidded into the crowd is the worse I've ever seen, mowing down all those people. RIP🙏
I thought you might have included the as train disaster in Tangiwai, it was a horrible accident. Also the flight to Mount Erebus in Antarctica.
The Mount Erebus disaster didn’t kill the sheer numbers that the featured accidents did, or make an impact like the death knell for Concorde (though the pilots actually weren’t blameless) or become the deadliest air show. Antarctica stands out for different reasons. Incidentally, the KLM captain was guiltier than portrayed. The cockpit voice recorder showed he knew he was taking off without clearance (KLM were found responsible). He was worried about being stuck on Tenerife if he was delayed long enough to go “out of hours”.
So many details left out.
The Concord air crash was on 25 July 2000, not 25 January 2000
and not built by France and England
The Concorde flew several years after the crash. SO THIS ACCIDENT DIDNOT END THE CONCORDE JET CAREER. Finally the cost of a ticket and jet fuel ended Concorde .
Well I think most people would agree that the crash was the beginning of the end. The economic strain was the final nail in the coffin, but exasperated by the fact that the public lost trust in that mode of travel, and did not see the benefit or what to suffer the risk to pay extra for super sonic travel. The crash of the Concorde was really what brought the era to an end.
It was actually the price of maintenance and the fuel that grounded Concorde... trust me, the passengers could easily afford the tix!
@@cigarsgunsanddiesel8032 I definitely think that was part of it, and I do think if people wanted to take the concord they could. But they didn't want to because of the crash. At least from all the reports/documentaries I've seen.
That crash ended Concorde
⁰😊
Wonder was the very first video that caught my attention, and I love watching it. The 10 most horrifying tragedies caught my attention that I had to watch it with my family on a 65-inch TV just not to miss anything, wowed it left me speechless and sad😢
Did Concorde really fly at 6,000 metres (about 19,000 feet), some 5,500 metres (18,000 feet) lower than a 747 at that time?
Molly Hager has an absolutely wondaful narration voice.
@10:12 Number 8 just breaks my heart. And I had a lot of hatred for the plane's inefficiency, opulence ,just the genuine nature of what it represented, but was amazed at it's majesty in pulling off Mach 2. But to go out in the way it did... I am sad for it, and have come to love the airplane after the event... The people aboard, of course they deserve no fault in this. I wish this had never happened,. and wish they were still here, with their families...
Number two, Tenerife air disaster was proven to be the cause of this Dutch KLM disaster as the cockpit voice recorder showed that its captain knew he was taking off without clearance. He was worried about going “out of hours” and being stuck in Tenerife overnight.
Concord flew from London to New York in just over three hours, not seven.
The narrator did state correctly London to NY took 3 1/2 hours on Concorde....
What happened in the Philippines--overloading of passengers--still takes place today.
Titanic fun fact. even if it had only been 4 compartments that were compromised it still would have eventually sunk. although there was a wall in between each compartment, they didn't go all the way up to the roof. there was a decent sized Gap at the top of each wall. basically making each compartment useless. only thing the compartment would do is make it take longer to sink. this was not due to the designer and owner of the ship, nor was it due to any construction defaults. that was simply the way that compartments were built then. they were a new thing and it just hadn't dawned on anybody. kind of like airplanes, where with each crash more and more info is learned and new technology is introduced. some is vital to the safety of passengers and crew, but they need to be improved upon. that's the same thing with the compartments on the ships then.they were some of the first to have them and nobody really knew a lot about new technologie they were introducing. they knew how it worked. they just didn't have some of the small things that can lead to major catastrophes worked out. like the gaps above the walls where the pipes and wires and bulsht went through
The Concorde should still be flying with upgrades. 1 crash in 27 years!! Really?? What is the real reason she is gone?? Elon, please fix this!! It was not even her fault!!
and it wasn't build by France and England it was built by France and the UK
Economics. The crash caused the fleet to be grounded at huge cost to BA and Air France and resulted in loss of confidence. Then 9/11 impacted on its primary route. It was expensive to run and incredibly noisy which limited the routes it could fly. What finally killed it was in 2003 Airbus the manufacturer of the aircraft (formerly BAC/ Aerospatiale) announced that they would no longer be providing OEM support putting the entire burden of repairs and maintenance on the only two operators of the type.
flight 123 was indeed a Boeing 747. So why show us a Boeing 737 in your video. And about the Concorde crash in Paris, that had nothing to do with a lack of power in the right engine. The fire led to such extreme high temperatures that the left side of the plane was basically consumed, including important wiring. That plane was doomed the minute the debris hit the fuel-tank. Even if they would have had two engines on the right side, they still wouldn't have made it. The tank was a design flaw, way to vulnerable.
I don't agree it was a design flaw as such. I think it was more of an oversight in design because who thinks debris will be on the runway to be hit and destroy the tire. Clearly the tank needed reinforcement but I really can't reach the design flaw conclusion.
@@JPF941 You'd be surprised how often debris is left on runways. Not to mention blowouts during landings and takes offs. For that reason alone protection of the fuel tanks should be one of the priority's of a designer. Everything that can lead to a fire during landing or take off is a risk you want to eliminate, especial if you are the designer of that plane. An extra armed plate to protect the tanks of the Concorde could have saved the lives of 109 people.
You noticed that too huh? Did you notice the MANY other incorrect statements and representations in the video???
Very wonderful series well prepared documentry.with factual information of the incidents that occured.
except the bit about concord which wasn't built by France and England as stated in this video
Really?? You're either family or friends of the creators, right? Or did they pay you to say that??? Hmm!~
🤦🏻♀️💔seen this lately don't need to see it twice..madning for the kids sake
My Granny was a little girl and remembers her my great grandma sitting round the radio .
there were worst ship sinkings taking more lives than the Titanic
Gustav Adolphus -- 7,000.
Wilhelm Gustloff losing around 9000 of 10000 aboard after being torpedoed by a Soviet submarine.
the back track at 3:00 is the best Adam & The Ants /Killing Joke /Gary Glitter Band
Fist-Pump Beat ! Stomping Stuff Man 😁
What about the world war II bomber crash during the air show in the United States a few years ago?
The Vector was a scape goat. Corruption is well in the Philippines so if the company has money, chances are they will never be held accountable.
Wow.
Don't forget the Sultana, a Mississippi riverboat charged with repatriating Union POW's after the Civil War ended in 1865. One night her boilers exploded and she burned and sank, killing nearly 1600 - more than the Titanic.
I always thought the Tenerife air disaster was the worst ever.
That should be a law that more than one jetliner on the runway at a time is not allowed..
OMG😮
OMG 😮!!!!
none of the 747s at Tenerife had winglets as you show
They also incorrectly state that japan airlines 123 was the deadliest airplane accident, when it was tenerife.
@@AccidentallyOnPurposego do your documentary
@@AccidentallyOnPurpose They meant JAL was the worst SINGLE plan disaster.
Winglets were still a thing of the future at the time of Tenerife. I was just reading the book the other day .. Terror at Tenerife... Written by a survivor.
@@TheGospelQuartetParadise Yeah, but the narrator didn't say that
I think you need to fire whoever did the research on this video.
6. The worst train wreck in history was the 2004 Sri Lanka Tsunami train wreck.
5 & 2. Listing two separate incidents as the worst plane crash in history.
1. The worst shipwreck in history was the MV Wilhelm Gustloff, which is thought to have more than double the death toll of the Dona Paz. There's also more than half a dozen other WWII ships with a higher death toll than the one in the video. If I remember correctly, Titanic doesn't even make it into the top 10 worst.
Exactly. MV Wilhelm Gustav between 8 and 26,000.( I knew a little girl who was a passenger)
A list of well known disasters.
Wrong wrong. There weren’t enough boats to save the passengers of the Titannic. She had been designed to not need lifeboats. There were 3300. on board. There wasn’t capacity for 4000 in the lifeboats. Do you do any research or just guess
and its now been proven by James Cameron no less, than more lifeboats would have made the situation even worse.
van Zanten was in a hurry
At 20:18 it is claimed that the Titanic was found a few Kilometers away from where she sank! I guess AI reasoned the 1st Class Passengers insisted she sail a bit further as compensation for the high Fares they paid!?
"The falling of the japan airlines flight 123"?
Thumbs down for this just being an AI compilation.
Elevator referred to as "control flaps"?
So much misinformation with this video I can't finish it!
on the JAL crash the tail snapped off not like you show it
The tail?! Try part of the vertical stabilizer including the rudder.
Excellent video, except didn’t the concorde crash happen on 25 July, 2000?
small detail but Japan Air 123 wasn't the deadliest air crash, yes for single plane but not overall , but maybe that's what it meant
the deadliest total was the Tenerife
Worst maritime disaster was the Wilhelm Gustloff January 30 1945 some 10,000 lost when torpedoed by Soviet sub S13
I have the full footage … never show this to anyone
I seen that crash. It literally cut people in half legs and stomach over there chest and head over here. Children were beheaded no arms no legs. Literally makes ya sick to see all that. There are videos of it on internet. Including one that is not censored. Reason we were there my wife is Ukrainian.🇺🇦🇺🇸
SU 27. 7 ton...
No it's 14,1 ton, empty.
'And $2 million in damage. The Plane alone, is $44 millions.
Yeah, now imagine if they would've covered the Wilhelm Gustloff...
Titanic is shorter than 3 football fields, 3 football fields = 300 meters. Don't mix metric and a US mislabelled sport field length as a reference in the same sentence.
The accident between PanAm and KLM on Tenerife in 1977 was not the fault of KLM but of flight control on Tenerife, in addition, the crew of the PanAm Boeing could also have decided not to go onto the runway, so these are factors and not KLM that is solely to blame for this.
The Pan Am crew were supposed to be on the runway. They were just confused on where to turn off! The Dutch pilot was 100% responsible for this. For a few reasons!
i feel like bad person watching this.
JAL123 was a 747, but this fact is not reflected in the video images.
Face??? Better do a self check when commenting!
@@markk8225 Thanks :)
I always check, but this one slipped by.
Great narration and lots of history
Thanks for the great works
if titanic was not filled to compacity (passengers) just think about this with how many lifeboats and how they were filled how many more people would of died
6000 meters??? no.
At 19:00 it was claimed the Titanic was designed with lifeboats for 4000 People. Rubbish! This Video was designed by substandard AI Editors!
Who puts a gas line next to a train line? Just asking for trouble.
The KLM pilot was in a rush. Now , instead of waiting sixty seconds , he's still not there. Stupid.
i have no words...
Well, sorry, your video is full of wrong info and you are all over the place - for example how is the sinking of Spanish armada a disaster? IT was planned military action. If you apply same logic then Stalingrad battle was also disaster, entire WW2 was disaster and so on...Thumbs down.
Read the title. Try again.
@@WanderingBobAK The narration specifically calls it "one of the worst maritime disasters in history", which as they detailed it's clearly not.
"Plane, Train And Ship Crashes" in the title does not match the sinking of the Spanish Armada either.
It's almost certainly all "AI" generated, just like the narration.
wasn't France and England it was France and the UK. England is only 1 of the countries of the UK you also have Wales,Scotland and NI
M/S Estonia
This was a bit hit and miss IMO - lots of 'padding' and simplistic analysis. My most hated gaffe is "acrobatics". I visualise the pilot dressed in a pink leotard with matching sweatband doing Jane Fonda contortions before climbing into the aircraft.
I CANNOT STAND THESE PEOPLE USING METRICS BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW METRIC CONVERSATIONS!!!!!
MH370 was shot down by the US Navy, on exercise in the area ... RiP All
At 17:55 the video shows the Titanic REVERSING into the Iceberg! Lots of other hick-ups are described in the Comments before mine!~ Thumbs down!!
I hate AI programs!Stop it!
Collisions,?in the mid,air,hws that impossible to hppens?↘️🚫☀️☀️☀️🔥☄️tragic
When we innovate with technology there are risk until we refine the technology. But in some cases we are just repeating the same things over and over. We gain more knowledge and understanding on how to do things. Whether we learn from our mistakes is up to us.
Concorde was not on its way to New York. This was. Tourist flight to enable people to have a Concorde experience. The party was mainly composed of Germans. And the French wouldn’t have lost it had they lined the fuel tanks with a composite rubber which British Airways were doing. The engines had not caught fire. The fuel tank was venting fuel into the heat of the exhaust and blew out. The wing was actually on fire
The Concorde was having mostly Germans onboard. You are right about that. They were suppoost to enjoy a luxury cruise that started in New York. So New York was indeed the destination of this Concorde.
It takes you OVER 3 minutes 10 seconds into your video to get to the 1st point. Cut to the chase, 20 minutes tops. You REALLY milk the length of this video with too much bla bla bla and a lovely woman's voice does not really go with death and disasters.
Most of the time you are showing the wrong planes just to make filler......Thumbs down. Robot voice too sucks...
I fell down the stairs the other day and grazed my leg. That was a disaster of biblical proportions.
I should make it into the top 10 of the next edition of great disasters.
Pimples
It could be like the show LOST.
Comment #10
the titanic story is fake
Good Lord they have so many things wrong in this stupid video
Why do you narrate in English and then in foreign language for volume, speed and distances? It makes my viewing a WASTE of time. I'm NOT going to sit here and convert French to English or convert speed and distance to feet and miles per hour because it is the same trouble. Your target audience is not Canada because there is nobody there. No references in English ruins your video. Language applies exactly same to speed and distance as words. I have to look up what "papion" means in French for instance "butterfly" translated. I cannot see 20m? I can see 65'-7" and forget metrics better because one has to split hairs in all measuring systems. If i say 65' exactly then that would be 19,8 meters (less accurate by the way) You narrate in English and "So Should Distance Then" is my point. You can blame man in Genesis 11-9 of the Tower of babel.
😢dam
*Matatan. ×®× .Ribirin H-S*
like
Unborn Babies are not statistics either.
Everyone is a statistic whether you like it or not, even you
Comment 2
An Iceberg "struck an Ocean liner"? Maam?