Steve Reviews: Animal Farm

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2018
  • Today we look at another 'kids' film which really isn't a kids film. Though looking like something from the Disney studios, this little gem was actually part funded by the CIA to promote anti-communism. As a result it features a lot of dark themes and frequent animal violence, but is an interesting film none the less!
    Twitter - / reviews_steve
    Patreon - www.patreon.com/user?u=16101082
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12 тис.

  • @NotVeryRandomDude
    @NotVeryRandomDude 4 роки тому +4191

    1945 - Manga
    1954 - Anime
    1999 - Netflix adaptation

    • @ooppetal2183
      @ooppetal2183 4 роки тому +128

      that's almost exactly how Watership Down went :0

    • @shoozebelstar6664
      @shoozebelstar6664 4 роки тому +23

      Also 1954 - Suitmation.

    • @myblueyoshi2967
      @myblueyoshi2967 4 роки тому +43

      2021-Sony animation pictures

    • @Chuked
      @Chuked 4 роки тому +4

      ThatRandomDude oh then I read the manga first👍

    • @oreo3740
      @oreo3740 4 роки тому +5

      Correction: 1977: Netflix adaptation

  • @ivorymantis1026
    @ivorymantis1026 4 роки тому +2542

    The good ending was...added.
    The original just has the abused citizens of animal farm looking over their new overlords remarking their resemblance to the old farmer in a way that "they couldn't tell the difference". The book ends there.

    • @bigboomer1013
      @bigboomer1013 4 роки тому +104

      The live action movie ends the same way.

    • @snowy2747
      @snowy2747 4 роки тому +358

      I preferred the book ending. It tells us that if you give into power and don’t fight back sooner, it could be too late. Just because someone is higher above you doesn’t make them right.

    • @rabbit8153
      @rabbit8153 3 роки тому +122

      I kinda see the movie ending as an infinite cycle which makes it more sad than the book
      I might see it wrong but that how I imagine

    • @unsuspiciousdweller8967
      @unsuspiciousdweller8967 3 роки тому +40

      Been years since I last saw the live action movie, but I could have sworn it ended with Napoleon dying of old age, and the other animals able to be free only then.

    • @pepticgloopys1013
      @pepticgloopys1013 3 роки тому +40

      i personally think that's the most important line of the book

  • @sadlittleghost8346
    @sadlittleghost8346 2 роки тому +842

    The ending of the book is extremely haunting. After seeing the pigs walking on two legs and wearing clothes, the other animals go back to check the rules because they were sure that wasn’t allowed. There they find “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” which is the last line of the book.

    • @willphoenix5464
      @willphoenix5464 11 місяців тому +241

      Don't forget the very last sentence
      "They looked at a pig, then at a man, and then at a pig, and they couldn't tell which was which"

    • @boi-op9lc
      @boi-op9lc 11 місяців тому +42

      @@willphoenix5464 what a way to end a book it left me with so many emotions

    • @nosebud3882
      @nosebud3882 10 місяців тому +37

      That’s not the last line of the book

    • @TheFawfulExpressMustardO-cx6mw
      @TheFawfulExpressMustardO-cx6mw 10 місяців тому +34

      "They looked from pig to man, then man to pig, then pig to man again, but already it was impossible to tell which was which.

    • @TheFawfulExpressMustardO-cx6mw
      @TheFawfulExpressMustardO-cx6mw 10 місяців тому +40

      Want to know the bets thing about the "some more equal than others" line. It's Benjamin, the donkey who has stayed apathetic and cryptic throughout the whole book, that reads it. Things have gotten so bad that even he can't ignore them anymore.

  • @BigBossMan538
    @BigBossMan538 11 місяців тому +233

    Maybe I'm misremembering, but Snowball always seemed like he actually had good intentions for the farm and the animals. His mistake was not realizing what Napoleon was up to and how easily exploitable their system was

    • @TheCam920
      @TheCam920 3 місяці тому +16

      Yep, if you remember, things were much more prosperous and happy under the democratic system where all animals could vote. It was after Napoleon's betrayal of animalism where life got much harder for the animals

    • @dylanpoynor2318
      @dylanpoynor2318 3 місяці тому +24

      I just finished the book and that is true. When George Orwell wrote Snowball he based him off of Leon Trotsky, who he greatly admired.

    • @jarrettadams4102
      @jarrettadams4102 25 днів тому +5

      Snowball truly wanted to help everyone, and while the farm he was building wouldn't have been perfect, he would never have screwed everyone over like Napoleon did

  • @dshe8637
    @dshe8637 5 років тому +2344

    This isn't a kid's film. The book (which is FAR more widely known and recognised than the films btw) is a political allegory of the Soviet system.
    George Orwell was always highly political in his writing; this isn't a children's story. Each of the characters represents an historical figure directly.

    • @trevor4212
      @trevor4212 5 років тому +58

      He never said it was a kids movie. He said he watched it as a kid.

    • @zsuzsannamezey8361
      @zsuzsannamezey8361 5 років тому +238

      @@trevor4212 the thumbnail literally says "DISTURBING KIDS FILM!" in bold yellow letters.

    • @hydroastral2830
      @hydroastral2830 5 років тому +4

      woooosh

    • @Patrick61804
      @Patrick61804 5 років тому +11

      D She they make all freshman read it in my school

    • @hellonokay1925
      @hellonokay1925 5 років тому +3

      He knew that this was not a kids film he put a ' this on the word kids

  • @maxrealhero313
    @maxrealhero313 3 роки тому +9237

    As soon as the hogfather pig died of a heart attack, I got an ad of someone flipping burgers and I lost my mind. I couldn't stop laughing.

    • @catandrobbyflores
      @catandrobbyflores 3 роки тому +206

      I got lip gloss

    • @RaraZeCat
      @RaraZeCat 3 роки тому +299

      I’m just waiting for an ad for pig skin boots, or candy that contians geletan.

    • @TheUnheardVoices_
      @TheUnheardVoices_ 3 роки тому +58

      😂

    • @TheBatIsRad6436
      @TheBatIsRad6436 3 роки тому +173

      If only it was bacon. That wounded been perfect

    • @KFrost-fx7dt
      @KFrost-fx7dt 3 роки тому +47

      Are people still not using adblock these days?

  • @madness_mania
    @madness_mania Рік тому +189

    13:50 the pig really said 😭😭😒😭😭
    LIKE THAT WAS MY FAVORITE THING EVER

    • @Antonio-fj5gs
      @Antonio-fj5gs Рік тому +15

      The beginning of that fake mourning moment
      Squealer: 😭I was with him right to the end 👀

  • @bellarawding6470
    @bellarawding6470 2 роки тому +1329

    The ending-
    In the book, the ending is literally that pretty much everyone is dead, now theres only really Benjamin, Clover (Another Horse), and a few others. Napoleon randomly goes dictator mode, along with another pig, Squealer (Squealer is Napoleons little, lets say, controller I guess. In the book, he is EXTREMALLY persuasive and is constantly convincing the animals that everything is a-okay.)
    Everyone is now miserable. They all understand whats going on, yet they have so little power, they have to just deal with it by now. The pigs break that whole moral conduct, and now Napoleon is drinking with other farmers, playing cards, showing his full dictator side by now and it's shown that the animals really are overworked, despite Squealer constantly saying they're doing way better than in Jones day.
    The book ends with the animals unable to tell whos who, human to pig, and an arguement breaking out about cards.
    The ending is sad. The ending is cruel and not happy at all. That's the point; the ending should not be happy out of a book based off of Dictators, Communism, and Oppression. The book was never supposed to have a happy ending as having one pretty much destroys the point of the plot; dictators are powerful and will silence you and force you into your place.
    Just my view on the book!

    • @milk-ub9zo
      @milk-ub9zo 2 роки тому +93

      The point of the end of the book is that even the very ones who had sworn to never because like their enemies (humans) became just like them in front of the irresistible thirst for power.

    • @TheBeachBoysOfficial
      @TheBeachBoysOfficial Рік тому

      @@milk-ub9zo *cough* Biden *cough* *cough* Democrats *cough* *cough*

    • @milk-ub9zo
      @milk-ub9zo Рік тому +13

      @@TheBeachBoysOfficial what even are you talking about this book was released in 1945 it's about the russian revolution and afterwards

    • @Da.Liar-Pig
      @Da.Liar-Pig Рік тому +12

      I just remembered that I watch the documentary about the production of this animated adaptation
      It was said that John Halas did not want to change the ending but it was said to do so

    • @koyomin241
      @koyomin241 Рік тому +20

      "they looked from man And pig, than pig to man. But saw no difference"

  • @thenecroticraptor8338
    @thenecroticraptor8338 4 роки тому +3547

    You know it's bad when the *_raven_* looks away.

    • @penguinw7
      @penguinw7 4 роки тому +118

      his name is Moses

    • @a.k8185
      @a.k8185 4 роки тому +51

      Actually .........*you are right*

    • @mediatorraptor3349
      @mediatorraptor3349 4 роки тому +81

      It just witness some of his bird relative get torn into pieces. Of course it would look away.

    • @CAPTAPHOENIXF90
      @CAPTAPHOENIXF90 4 роки тому +32

      Yup, that one of the clue context that my teacher taught me that horrific death of these animals

    • @shuliu4804
      @shuliu4804 4 роки тому +21

      Poor berd.

  • @isaaccrawford5108
    @isaaccrawford5108 5 років тому +2012

    The book doesn't have a happy ending. It just ends all depressing with Napoleon as a horrible dictator. It's so depressing when it ends.
    Edit: I cant believe so many of you like this comment. You're welcome.

    • @Snowfang00andco
      @Snowfang00andco 5 років тому +330

      But the ending of the book brings up the main idea behind the story. In the book, Napoleon and the other pigs are sitting with a group of humans. When the animals looked through the glass at them, they couldn't tell the difference between the two groups. Meaning that Napoleon had completely gone against what Old Major had told them years ago.

    • @yeethittter1285
      @yeethittter1285 4 роки тому +147

      @@Snowfang00andco and Napoleon convinces all animals throughout the book that they are equal, but it ends in a sort of loop when he ends up exactly like farmer joe

    • @CheshireCesare
      @CheshireCesare 4 роки тому +134

      @@Snowfang00andco Man, when the animals started walking upright in the book and essentially becoming "human"... even just reading that freeeaakeddd me out, it was somewhat expected and yet... *not* ...

    • @fatmanbatman9374
      @fatmanbatman9374 4 роки тому +36

      Thats how 1984 ended orwell had bad endings

    • @Rassilons-hand-me-downs
      @Rassilons-hand-me-downs 4 роки тому +30

      That’s why I love the book tbh

  • @ilikebeanies3499
    @ilikebeanies3499 2 роки тому +345

    I read the book for the first time last week, not for class but just to read it. The book is good, and has no happy ending. The animals continue to be brainwashed.
    Its more realistic honestly, and it's a great parallel to real events and how real people think.
    I love that the hard workers were represented by Boxer, the communists were represented as Pigs, and the obedient military was the dogs. Very literal, I love it

    • @novawilde2096
      @novawilde2096 10 місяців тому

      The pigs wernt communists the animals where. The pigs are what's called a vanguard party which took power after the socialist uprising of all the animals.
      Orwell was a socialist himself. He wanted the revolution. His warnings where about totalitarianism and the way that a pro worker movement could become just as toxic as any other system. It's a crisicism of the left from the left.

  • @boop7405
    @boop7405 Рік тому +96

    the boxer plotline disturbed me so much in both the book and movie but imo its worse in the movie cause you see it all happen and seeing boxer scream and cry while he’s getting pulled away to the glue factory. Absolutely traumatized me

    • @JeanMurray-wc2mr
      @JeanMurray-wc2mr 3 місяці тому +1

      Same, I watched this when I was a kid and I never forgot about it..years later as an adult reading the book it had the same effect on me.

    • @jwebcoding7289
      @jwebcoding7289 Місяць тому

      The most cynical part about it was that they used the money from selling him to the knacker to buy a whole case of booze so the pigs could get drunk.

  • @__________5802
    @__________5802 5 років тому +4660

    It is not your farm...
    IT IS *OUR* FARM

  • @santiagoboscan3277
    @santiagoboscan3277 5 років тому +5218

    I didn’t know that Soviet Union got an anime adaptation

  • @kilssj2250
    @kilssj2250 2 роки тому +204

    It's because they killed off the female dog. I don't remember her name, but she was the mother of the puppies that were taken and turned into soldiers.
    I feel like she played an integral role in the readers understanding throughout the book 📖.

    • @serenitythesiren5031
      @serenitythesiren5031 Рік тому +53

      In the book, she was sort of divided into two dogs, one named Jessie, one named Bluebell. The saddest part is, neither of them die. Napoleon just takes the puppies to 'educate' them.

    • @featherybastard
      @featherybastard Місяць тому

      in the book she isn't all that important but her role is bumped up significantly in the 1999 film

  • @ghostslayer1981
    @ghostslayer1981 Рік тому +93

    I always thought it was creepy how napoleon in the book was always able to keep the rest of the farm from overthrowing him and going back to snowball after he's kicked out. He keeps using him as a scapegoat for multiple misdeeds (which never happened) and slowly over the book change who snowball was from a true animal hero who attacked Jones and lead the animal charge to being a traitor to Jones and helping the humans fight, leading the human charge. It's creepy because he does it so well by slowly blurring that line with the animals forgetting all the specifics of the tale and eventually getting it warped due to that. And if anyone questioned it, like say Boxer? Death, as we see. Napoleon knows that to keep control, he needs to build trust and upkeep all his lies. And in the book and movie, he really does that well.

    • @meh8982
      @meh8982 Рік тому

      Orwell does a similar thing in 1984 with "Goldstein" as the all-purpose scapegoat. I think in Animal Farm the Snowball role was inspired by Trotsky. It's typical of authoritarian regimes. You often see the same thing today.

  • @ThatOneMan830
    @ThatOneMan830 5 років тому +4801

    >Animal Farm
    >Kid’s film
    Pick one, you can’t have both.

    • @Bananappleboy
      @Bananappleboy 5 років тому +62

      alex bajayo both

    • @Swock010
      @Swock010 5 років тому +40

      @@Bananappleboy dam gottem 👌🏼😂👏🏼👍🏼

    • @mrheroprimes
      @mrheroprimes 5 років тому +21

      i remeber this movie Scared the ever Living Daylights out of me as a kid, I think it's from one of those 5 dollar DVDs that were sold a alongside compilation dvds of old 1930/40's Warner Brothers cartoons and superman cartoons, also including two very badly dubbed South Korean anime films Diatron-5 and Defenders of space (it's main robot that appear in this film is basically Inferno from Transformers Generation 1),walmart in the early 2000's.

    • @sentinelkinjo
      @sentinelkinjo 5 років тому +3

      alex bajayo
      Animal Farm
      Always

    • @bubblenugget1215
      @bubblenugget1215 5 років тому +1

      How about neither

  • @kloverleavezisdeadlol
    @kloverleavezisdeadlol 4 роки тому +3649

    Fun Fact: Animal Farm is actually the first British animated film.
    *looks like the began on a dark note*

  • @uyq5726
    @uyq5726 2 роки тому +101

    I love how Steve forgets boxers name half way in and starts calling him buster.

  • @The-Macdoo
    @The-Macdoo Рік тому +56

    They actually explain the whole "wings count as legs" a lot better in the book.

  • @FiveOClockTea
    @FiveOClockTea 4 роки тому +1720

    Funnily enough in France it's illegal to name your pig Napoleon 🐷

    • @christinao9061
      @christinao9061 4 роки тому +172

      iirc in the French translation of Animal Farm they call the character Cesar

    • @hypnoticskull6342
      @hypnoticskull6342 4 роки тому +50

      I wonder why! XD

    • @housel9352
      @housel9352 4 роки тому +94

      They dont want to taint Napoleon's name with a communist swine

    • @girlhelp8364
      @girlhelp8364 4 роки тому +20

      But is it illegal to name any other animal the name?

    • @crapaudbiscornu7941
      @crapaudbiscornu7941 4 роки тому +7

      fullmetaljaco Why would anyone do that to begin with ? What would be the point ?

  • @aidanveldman1378
    @aidanveldman1378 5 років тому +8694

    Don’t talk about the anime if you haven’t read the manga

    • @Ben-uc8ms
      @Ben-uc8ms 5 років тому +296

      ^This

    • @theadamfriedlandshow4668
      @theadamfriedlandshow4668 5 років тому +182

      Amen

    • @Zigtyr
      @Zigtyr 5 років тому +70

      What sort of bad stuff happens in the manga?

    • @dutchvanderlinde5855
      @dutchvanderlinde5855 5 років тому +501

      Sigtyr
      Well, the animals don’t win in the book. In fact, the animals don’t even revolt at all in the book. They just look at the pigs and humans and can’t tell the difference between them.

    • @slightlyistorical1776
      @slightlyistorical1776 5 років тому +51

      Rancid Cheese don’t read Manga and don’t watch Anime

  • @Metalsluga_
    @Metalsluga_ Рік тому +36

    Fun fact: Snowball didn't get killed, he just got chased off and when the windmill got blown down (not by dynamite, they left out the bit out in the film) they blame it on snowball

    • @basilcat3111
      @basilcat3111 6 місяців тому +3

      In the animated version, he died.

    • @Metalsluga_
      @Metalsluga_ 6 місяців тому +10

      @@basilcat3111 oh yeah, I meant in the book, I forgot to include that

  • @WillieManga
    @WillieManga 2 роки тому +158

    I must say, the pigs slowly blurring the line between man and beast was essential and I am glad it was implemented in the movie.

  • @pacoramon9468
    @pacoramon9468 5 років тому +2478

    The donkey gets thinner and thinner after Napoleon takes over, nice detail.

  • @RaeNapier64
    @RaeNapier64 5 років тому +4132

    ANIMAL FARM WAS NEVER MEANT FOR CHILDREN!!!!! IT WAS BASED OFF A GEORGE ORWELL NOVEL. A TYPICALLY DARK ADULT CENTRIC AUTHOR WHO SPECIALIZED IN POLITICAL/SOCIAL COMMENTARY. IF YOU LET YOUR CHILD READ/ WATCH HIS WORK THEN THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM NOT OURS

    • @ammla8219
      @ammla8219 5 років тому +22

      Rae Napier Ik

    • @cyperus4589
      @cyperus4589 5 років тому +195

      I REALLY HATE SHOUTING ONLINE!!!!

    • @jacobmorrison4480
      @jacobmorrison4480 5 років тому +14

      I’m doing the book for gcse

    • @Shift12
      @Shift12 5 років тому +185

      Was looking to see if someone else had mentioned this fact. Just because its a cartoon that doesn't nesecarrily mean that it's for children, for an extreme comparison would you let a child watch Fritz the Cat? Or would you say Fritz is suitable for children?

    • @Purplefire0796
      @Purplefire0796 5 років тому +53

      Rae Napier my high school made me read and watch Animal Farm. This was the first year of high school at least for me

  • @MrAlmindore58
    @MrAlmindore58 2 роки тому +65

    Can we take a moment to reflect that Steve's doctor is Dr. Jones, and the farmer ALSO has that surname?

  • @Miltypooh2001
    @Miltypooh2001 11 місяців тому +22

    I love the fact that the pigs became the very thing they hated, and seeing the pups turn into huge hound dogs was pretty dark. Especially when the donkey in the movie looks at the window and sees the pigs wearing suits and walking on two legs

    • @hiddendesire3076
      @hiddendesire3076 5 місяців тому +4

      It’s accurate as well politically speaking. Those who claimed to be anti-fascists and against central government have they themselves embraced fascist tactics, barbarism, and calls for totalitarian regimes where no criticism of their “glorious” ideology is allowed.

  • @HunhowsShadowStalker
    @HunhowsShadowStalker 5 років тому +4077

    >Implying Animal Farm was ever meant for children.
    I'm so disappointed.

    • @bigmeknurgle
      @bigmeknurgle 5 років тому +72

      It was a cartoon movie released in 1954. Two years later VHS was invented. You think parents, throughout the 60's, 70's and 80's, browsing through videos for low-effort childminding tools (a kid wont wander about or hurt himself if he's sat still watching a film for 2 hours) would look at the cover and think "CLEARLY this is not for children", and thus no child ever saw it?
      Also, your newfriend status is showing, ass. Such clever people in youtube comment sections. I'm so disappointed.

    • @srgtshocwave
      @srgtshocwave 5 років тому +62

      bigmeknurgle I... I think he was joking bud...

    • @HunhowsShadowStalker
      @HunhowsShadowStalker 5 років тому +111

      @@bigmeknurgle Wow, someone's in a bad mood. I was clearly joking and pointing out a mistake he made when he referred to the video as if it were a children's movie.
      You should probably develop a sense of humor, because you're acting like an asshole without one.

    • @thearchive792
      @thearchive792 5 років тому +18

      @@bigmeknurgle Oh now that's E D G Y

    • @bigmeknurgle
      @bigmeknurgle 5 років тому +9

      @??? It wasn't a mistake, the film was advertised and sold as a childrens movie. The content doesn't matter after mommy and daddy have spent their money and left junior in front of the TV for a few hours. So get over it? _Edit; comedy is subjective, and the OP wasn't funny. It was aloof bragging that came from the assumption of knowing-it-all._
      ​ @Ivan Jocic Lotsa butthurt wannabe commies, it seems. With the 10 global monopolies controlling every type of consumable, you think that's gonna happen anytime soon? You think your local government will allocate funds so you can have a chocolate bar or a can of energy drink in your monthly rations? Lol no

  • @chronovac
    @chronovac 5 років тому +1847

    It's almost like it's based on an Orwell novel

  • @Floorbie_Nana
    @Floorbie_Nana 2 роки тому +21

    Somewhat fun fact: George Orwell himself described his story as “an animal fable” as if it were just a fun fairytale

    • @sudokuacrobatics
      @sudokuacrobatics 5 місяців тому +2

      Yeah, it is a fairy tale compared to 1984 😂

  • @pyr821
    @pyr821 2 роки тому +20

    10:07
    Chickens: Rebel against the pigs
    Napoleon: orders the dogs to kill the cat for no reason

    • @Antonio-fj5gs
      @Antonio-fj5gs Рік тому +3

      Me: oh my god
      Ok lol.

    • @3D-6
      @3D-6 Місяць тому

      It said that the innocent die with the guilty

  • @AKIPOPOPOPOOON
    @AKIPOPOPOPOOON 5 років тому +529

    *ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS*

  • @ironybob
    @ironybob 4 роки тому +809

    Fact : it’s illegal in France to call a pig Napoleon

    • @motherofdogs7980
      @motherofdogs7980 4 роки тому +34

      LeRaptorFrançais
      I think it's because of this movie

    • @juliamavroidi8601
      @juliamavroidi8601 4 роки тому +57

      That's why in the french version if the book Napoleon is called César

    • @CedricsSpecialLP
      @CedricsSpecialLP 4 роки тому +4

      Julia Mavroidi I think that was what Orwell originally wanted to call him.

    • @anissayessaad4737
      @anissayessaad4737 4 роки тому +1

      Ah bon?

    • @Thegamergabe4.0
      @Thegamergabe4.0 3 роки тому +1

      Funny how Wario knows this. Love you Wah!!

  • @aspenrose_
    @aspenrose_ 2 роки тому +31

    6:04 animals in minecraft taking damage

    • @floproro4
      @floproro4 11 місяців тому

      Minecraft animals revolting against the players for attacking them:

  • @ming-tachang988
    @ming-tachang988 2 роки тому +28

    I remember watched this film on Taiwan's TV once about 1989-90. I was shocked when Boxer was taken and Benjamin chasing the wagon part, I was hoping that something would happen to save that poor horse as what would happened in most Disney's films. Few years later I had chance to read the book in 9th grade literature and suddenly remembered the film I watched as kid. Great book and film, too bad that is not well known in Asia.

  • @pugachan9928
    @pugachan9928 5 років тому +1365

    Cant wait for Netflix live action adaptation starring Amy smucher as napoleon.

    • @katejuricak7941
      @katejuricak7941 5 років тому +24

      Omg 😂😂😂😂

    • @pandagal9805
      @pandagal9805 5 років тому +6

      My god! 😆😆

    • @gubadagoober
      @gubadagoober 5 років тому

      No not napoleon vladimir lenin

    • @pulletpocket
      @pulletpocket 5 років тому +2

      You mean Mr. Jones?

    • @anon9579
      @anon9579 5 років тому +9

      Good role for her because she is a pig lol

  • @deeznutz5825
    @deeznutz5825 4 роки тому +3182

    The first pig was Carl Marx, snowball was Lenin, napoleon was Stalin, the farmer was the tsar, the neighbors were nazies, the banker was America and the west, the crow was the Russian Orthodox Church, the chickens were the rest of the Soviet blok, the dogs were the kgb, the windmill represented the same things as in the movie but mostly industrialization, the horse was the Russian people, the pigs were the bourgeoisie, all the alcohol represented Stalin’s vodka plants, and yes the book was a fairly comprehensive history of the Russian revolution.

    • @TheChaosDragoness
      @TheChaosDragoness 4 роки тому +391

      I'd argue more that Snowball was Trotsky.

    • @faltanato6375
      @faltanato6375 3 роки тому +36

      Xddss
      Nel bro, Stalin always have fighted for Revolution he never came to some highter position by brute force unlike Hitler or mussolini or even napoleon...
      He fighted since age of 17,in the small squirmishes againts Tsar secret police he played a big rol as info delivery, he assisted to the first illegal council of Russia in 1912 and he was a key part to win the Russian Civil war wich it was as bad as WW1 in terms of destruction...
      He commanded many operations and missions during the war, he commanded the assault to Tsaritsim and volga river wich were crucial to win the war, he save so many people from hunger and canibalism in rural areas that many of the troops screamed while in battle "FOR COMRADE STALIN!!! URAAAA"(well he was againt's culture to the leader, but well he did what he could)...
      Well,i know he is not an angel since he officially killed 90k persons during USSR, and did not bother to care about his daughter and son...but he was indeed a truly smart and comprensible man discribed by the generals and others(incluiding Kruschnev lol) "very smart and very capable person".
      He was electer by the communist party to lead USSR and he achive more than lenin(lol obviously),in 1928 he turned USSR more socialist marxis leninist(stalinism term does not exist since the only different action by stalin was to not continue militarising all communist partys know as "Socialism for one country" explaining the socialism most come supported by their people) than before.
      He also didn't rule during 1938-1945
      Also he wanted to leave his charge as chief secretary of Communist party becouse he was old...but communal elections(made by the people) force him to rule more years...well, they technically can force someone to lead em and to leave the charge.(wow is not dictadorship xd).

    • @faltanato6375
      @faltanato6375 3 роки тому +23

      @@TheChaosDragoness lenin said that Trostky came to late to the revolution and had their own ideas, he was a infiltrator to deliver information outside the USSR...well something like a Spy...during a mission on Italy stalin got warn that a comrade has betray USSR in his mission and turned out to be Trostky when he was seen at the image of italian newspaper close to mussolini...this only means betrayal.
      (And you know what this means, death or deported)
      Trotsky was warned thay stalin will kill him for betrayal so,outside of USSR trotsky made the internationalle turn againts USSR, and spread anti communist propaganda.
      Trotsky death is well deserved.
      At least Stalin wasn't like churchill

    • @PHAToregon
      @PHAToregon 3 роки тому +12

      Un nombre, Nada mas 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄😂😂🙄😂😂😂.

    • @PHAToregon
      @PHAToregon 3 роки тому +65

      Un nombre, Nada mas official records of 799,455 executions (1921-1953), around 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag, some 390,000 deaths during the dekulakization forced resettlement, and up to 400,000 deaths of persons deported during the 1940s - with a total of about 3.3 million officially recorded victims in these categories. The deaths of at least 5.5 to 6.5 million persons in the famine of 1932-33 are sometimes, but not always, included with the victims of the Stalin era.
      Oof. How many millions did Churchill have?

  • @Ballin4Vengeance
    @Ballin4Vengeance 2 роки тому +110

    7:57 replace “Napoleon” with “Stalin,” “Snowball” with “Trotsky” and You’ve got yourself a documentary

    • @logan_M_
      @logan_M_ 2 роки тому +34

      I mean that is the whole point. The original book was an allegory of the Russian revolution.

    • @justaguywhowatchesyoutube5588
      @justaguywhowatchesyoutube5588 5 місяців тому

      Who’s Trotsky?

    • @pabloprieto3338
      @pabloprieto3338 3 місяці тому +3

      @@justaguywhowatchesyoutube5588 he was an anti-stalinist communist

    • @kdcwilliams1839
      @kdcwilliams1839 3 місяці тому +2

      Sometimes, I wonder, if Trotsky or “Snowball” would actually have been a good leader in the long run.

    • @pabloprieto3338
      @pabloprieto3338 3 місяці тому +1

      @@kdcwilliams1839 well he only was in the story for a short period of time but his character seem to care for his comrades way more than napoleon

  • @CJ-hp6fb
    @CJ-hp6fb 2 роки тому +10

    Fun fact: Orwell's real name is Eric- the reason why he changed his name is that he didn't want ppl to know his true name or identity and he also wanted to start fresh when he started writing articles.

  • @ploppman7524
    @ploppman7524 5 років тому +525

    Based on a book by George Orwell? Oh I'm sure it's all sunshine and rainbows from the same author as 1984.

    • @thomaspatton926
      @thomaspatton926 5 років тому +20

      Yeah anytime you are talking about communism it’s gonna be sunshine and rainbows

    • @thek2despot426
      @thek2despot426 5 років тому +1

      @mary sunshine Things that look beautiful but are really just destructive and/or lies? I think maybe the "sunshine and rainbows" saying works even better thinking of it like *that* in the contexts it is often used; for example, in this case communism.

    • @Outlaw7263
      @Outlaw7263 4 роки тому +1

      Archer: Wait, there are animals?
      Lana: No, Animal Farm.
      Cyril: How do you not get that?
      Archer: No, I know what an animal farm is.
      Cyril: Not an animal farm.
      Archer: Maybe we can stampede a flock of goats down the hall.
      Lana: ANIMAL FARM IS A BOOK!
      Archer: No, it’s not Lana. It’s an allegorical novella about Stalinism by George Orwell, and spoiler alert, IT SUCKS!

    • @jessemcelroy2776
      @jessemcelroy2776 4 роки тому

      Censorship can be dangerous too.

    • @ballislife6034
      @ballislife6034 4 роки тому +1

      Outlaw7263 bro, you just posted *C R I N G E*

  • @brandongonzalez_
    @brandongonzalez_ 3 роки тому +3211

    I noticed something. As we first see the pups that Napoleon adopts, they are white, innocent pups that have pure souls. But as we see the pups grown up, their skin turns black and dark, corrupted by Napoleon’s dark intent, and the dogs are left to work for Napoleon not knowing of the pure life they could have had.

  • @ThatOneKaijuFan
    @ThatOneKaijuFan Рік тому +6

    When the hogfather pig died, i got an ad for the wendy’s baconator and couldn’t stop wheezing

  • @CrossCalipso
    @CrossCalipso 5 місяців тому

    Coming back to watch this video again! My senior class is doing a theater production later this year of Animal Farm, and I’m so excited. This video introduced me to Animal Farm. I read the book two years after watching this video, and absolutely loved it. Thank you Steve :3

  • @Fubukio
    @Fubukio 5 років тому +2225

    Animal Farm is not all bad...
    It makes eating bacon much more satisfying.

    • @drik4107
      @drik4107 5 років тому +66

      Truth is Truth

    • @Artizap_
      @Artizap_ 5 років тому +74

      Yes I wanted to take that little bitch Squealer and turn him into bacon. Sadly, he’s just a fictional character.

    • @gameknight9956
      @gameknight9956 5 років тому +8

      Dang you need more agreement

    • @Matkaizer08
      @Matkaizer08 4 роки тому +10

      And that's why pigs are for eating and nothing else!

    • @penguinhowser8459
      @penguinhowser8459 4 роки тому +23

      I want to eat Napoleon

  • @alastair876
    @alastair876 4 роки тому +1438

    I remember reading this my freshman year of highschool-
    Even younger dumbass me knew how much this book screamed "COMMUNISM"

    • @natalijatheghost
      @natalijatheghost 4 роки тому +69

      I loved this book as a freshman, and I still like it

    • @alastair876
      @alastair876 4 роки тому +8

      @@natalijatheghost same here tbh

    • @communisttrash8590
      @communisttrash8590 4 роки тому +114

      The best part is this is written by a socialist and is a critique on soviet communism but Orwell actually fought with communists and believed in communism he wrote a book on it called homage to Catalonia you should read it

    • @alastair876
      @alastair876 4 роки тому +36

      @@communisttrash8590 huh, that is quite interesting tbh. It's interesting to know that the book was a critique of a certain method of it.

    • @kevinnigins9488
      @kevinnigins9488 4 роки тому +4

      Alastair • Freshman? I was forced to read this book in 8th grade

  • @PIB2000
    @PIB2000 2 роки тому +12

    1:50 Considering this was based off a book by George Orwell, that is painfully ironic.

    • @Da.Liar-Pig
      @Da.Liar-Pig 2 роки тому

      Probably they got all the rights to the book after they approached george orwell's wife

  • @burleybater
    @burleybater 2 роки тому +8

    I recall Animal Farm as a nice lite read just on the downside of middle school, still just barely young enough to appreciate the fantasy fun and frolic. Those were solid Cold War days (the October crisis just fading backward in the rear view mirror). And even a kid could sense the allegorical symbolism of animals behaving like humans.
    I always thought of Animal Farm as a perfect predecessor to 1984, which showed up in my life a couple of years later, 'round about grade 8. Which led to high school wanderings through The Road to Wigan Pier and Down and Out in Paris and London. My main beef with Orwell at that time was that there just wasn't enough of him. Other than John Wyndham, there weren't enough other distractions from that particular era.
    I always suspected from the get-go that Orwell utilized the natural affinity that kids have for animals to create a kind of primer in authoritarian tyranny, easy to understand and translate into real-world terms as we grew up.

  • @bilbowagons7932
    @bilbowagons7932 5 років тому +933

    Old Major = Karl Marx
    Napoleon = Joseph Stalin
    Snowball = Leon Trotsky
    Boxer = working middle class
    Squealer = Institutional Propaganda/managers
    Moses =Institutional Religion
    This whole movie has communism written all over it

    • @scarletshadow4548
      @scarletshadow4548 5 років тому +55

      Snowball=Trotsky

    • @boistired6825
      @boistired6825 5 років тому +33

      your phone isn't cracked Old Major: Lenin
      Farmer Jones: Nicolas II
      Boxer: the good worker

    • @natalijatheghost
      @natalijatheghost 5 років тому +5

      That's what it was based on

    • @jacoba3422
      @jacoba3422 5 років тому +16

      your phone isn't cracked Second war= more like the battle of Stalingrad

    • @sophiatalksmusic3588
      @sophiatalksmusic3588 5 років тому +12

      Boxer= the working class, Moses the raven= religion, Mollie= the bourgeoisie

  • @alchemistfightinggunupstv5991
    @alchemistfightinggunupstv5991 4 роки тому +802

    If Peppa Pig was communist

    • @The8bitdin0
      @The8bitdin0 3 роки тому +29

      Profile picture checks out

    • @nalaprodd
      @nalaprodd 3 роки тому +3

      Lol

    • @plaguebringer7865
      @plaguebringer7865 3 роки тому +4

      Crap I can see It in my mind now

    • @dez1989
      @dez1989 3 роки тому +8

      If you can't tell, you are blind. Hitler, Uncle Joe, in the end they are all the same except for who they allow in their exclusive club...

    • @charlezjenkinz9918
      @charlezjenkinz9918 3 роки тому +1

      YES

  • @genghiskhan3091
    @genghiskhan3091 4 місяці тому +5

    "All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."

  • @Prime-Productions
    @Prime-Productions Рік тому +2

    We’re currently reading the book in school and so I had to come back and watch this video.

  • @troglodyte4207
    @troglodyte4207 5 років тому +685

    Not sure why’d you expect anything less from an adaptation of a George Orwell book

    • @BasicallyGoblin
      @BasicallyGoblin 5 років тому +26

      Who was an anti authoritarian Brit, but he seemed to skim right the fuck over that shit

    • @hollingharris659
      @hollingharris659 5 років тому +5

      thank you for saying the exact thing i was thinking but too lazy to comment myself

    • @datman2433
      @datman2433 5 років тому +6

      I can't wait to see "My 1984 summer"

  • @aclown36
    @aclown36 4 роки тому +1404

    *Animal Crossing: New Horizons,*
    *the Rated R version*

  • @singamummy8420
    @singamummy8420 Рік тому +6

    The scene where boxer is taken away and benjiman is running after him makes me cry every single time

  • @b_crystals
    @b_crystals 5 місяців тому +4

    “The animals looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again, but it was already impossible to tell which was which” I GASPED AT THAT

  • @TehBluPanda
    @TehBluPanda 5 років тому +480

    I love how my high school decided it was a good idea to have us read Animal Farm without any sort of grasp on important concepts like... communism... and politics...

    • @Artizap_
      @Artizap_ 5 років тому +12

      My 6th grade Middle School class thought it was a good idea as well...

    • @Chidera420
      @Chidera420 4 роки тому +2

      I also like how i have to waste my summer over this and fahrenheit 451

    • @dogecollection4519
      @dogecollection4519 4 роки тому +33

      The idea was that if you learn that absolute control and suppression of the people is bad as a child, you’re smart enough as you get older to understand why communism and fascism are bad. It sets a precedent

    • @hissanrach8797
      @hissanrach8797 4 роки тому +31

      @@dogecollection4519 Except it's an example of blatant dishonesty and ideological brainwashing in the education sector. Children are told to read stories which are literal propaganda before they have any understanding of what is even being portrayed specifically so it skews and warps their view of history, so they are conditioned to uncritically oppose something they don't understand, ie controlling what they think.

    • @SeruraRenge11
      @SeruraRenge11 4 роки тому

      I'm curious, what was their take on the book without understand the subtext?

  • @isamovies1192
    @isamovies1192 5 років тому +687

    The book was way darker and more depressing

    • @froggyslap
      @froggyslap 5 років тому +53

      Isa Movies
      of course, books usually have more detail and events that don’t get into the movies

    • @copperbunnies9849
      @copperbunnies9849 5 років тому +8

      @@froggyslap yes yes I agree; I do prefer books over the film adaptation

    • @raviothethief8292
      @raviothethief8292 5 років тому +3

      Isa Movies yup read it in 5th grade and my fucking God..

    • @noahbutler9180
      @noahbutler9180 5 років тому +1

      It is a really good book though

    • @noahbutler9180
      @noahbutler9180 5 років тому +4

      @@raviothethief8292 you read animal farm in 5th grade

  • @ushankabg
    @ushankabg Рік тому +4

    Did you know?
    In France is illegal to name your pig Napoleon.

  • @FirstnameLastname-cg2ej
    @FirstnameLastname-cg2ej 2 роки тому +4

    “Go watch something more upbeat, like Care Bears”
    I was expecting him to name literally any horror film

  • @3digitsonthebac156
    @3digitsonthebac156 5 років тому +842

    No-one:
    Any animal on Animal Farm:
    *C O M R A D E*

  • @kaywilliams7540
    @kaywilliams7540 4 роки тому +1401

    Steve: The animals begin to build Snowball's-
    Napoleon: *UNGODLY SCREAM*
    Steve: I mean, Napoleon's windmill
    Me: (○-○)

  • @applecrisps5304
    @applecrisps5304 2 роки тому +6

    So funny story, this was the first actual book my 7th grade class read. Not only did we read the book, that would be too nice, we also watched the movie 15 minutes at a time(once per day) and did a DBQ on it. This was the same year that we researched the horror genre and read multiple short stories with murder in each one.

  • @Independent_Stars
    @Independent_Stars Рік тому +3

    well the story was supposed to be creepy and sad because that was the way that the USSR was. With the working class (the animals) being slaves without even knowing it and the people at the top (the dogs and pigs) reaping all the benefits and at the same time keeping the working class from moving up.

  • @LemonMelonShork
    @LemonMelonShork 5 років тому +638

    "Oh GOD! Make it stop!"
    *Old Major dies*
    "Thank you."

    • @melodicmelody6730
      @melodicmelody6730 5 років тому +5

      lmaoo

    • @batkiwi3
      @batkiwi3 5 років тому +2

      I think ge died because of the animals xd

    • @batkiwi3
      @batkiwi3 5 років тому

      *he

    • @itsmoe0043
      @itsmoe0043 5 років тому +3

      We had to watch the film for class, and we may have laughed hysterically when Old Major died....

  • @yeethittter1285
    @yeethittter1285 4 роки тому +224

    I actually very recently finished reading the original book. It's actually surprising how different it is. For example, the cat doesn't actually die I'm pretty sure, and the book actually ends on the much lower note of the farm having gone through a loop and the pigs being exactly like farmer Jones.
    By the way, the "creepy song" at the beginning is a very important song from the book called 'Beasts of England', they just used animal noises instead of english lyrics. The animals did speak.

    • @blod9862
      @blod9862 4 роки тому +9

      The dog (mother of the puppies, tho technically there was two dogs who where mothers of the puppies) didn’t die in the battle, she died of old age in the last chapter

  • @rosedelacruz8232
    @rosedelacruz8232 4 місяці тому +2

    As someone who loves this channel to death, and just re-read animal farm in a whole day. I felt like a lot of context was missing and that the singing specifically by the animals was called "beast of England" was was a crie of wanting rebellion. And this was used many times throughout the book. There was a reoccurring theme of the sheep never being able to shut up about it, and the same with "4 legs good, 2 legs bad" which later they are indoctrinated from the pigs as "4 legs good 2 legs better" which I found was interesting. I also felt like the book conveyed a better way for boxer the horses death. As the scene of them explaining how he was desperately trying to kick his way after finding out he was going to his doom was sad. I enjoyed the fact also how they explaining not many animals could barely read or write and the ones who couldn't were the easiest to do so with. I though have never seen the movie. Think that a lot of things could have been used, also including that in the book the ending only ends with the pigs talking with humans. And the other animals looking into the windows and saying "I looked at the man, then the pig, man then pig. And all I could see was they looked the same" which I felt was a very sad yet great way to end the book. What confused me also is how young the donkey appeared in the movie, and how he was explaining as grump and never willing to help. Along with how the crow and the cat seemed to cease to exist for a certain amount of time. Where was Mollie the horse in all of this? Something I did also like a lot though was that they added the commandments into the movie as they are accurate. Also major (the old hog) abruptly dying was funny to me since his death in the book was 2 week later, and unseen by everything else. The best part of the movie in my opinion even if I have never seen it. Is the lying look from the pig, as explained in the book there is a line of the pig talking about boxers death named squealer was "suspiciously glancing from left to right" and they did it perfectly honestly. Again though I have not seen the movie so I can't take my own ideas super serious, but in all honesty snowball was the best and better leader and deserved better. It was interesting to since in the book he was shot and scathed on the back. Overall I think they stayed pretty close to the book and gave it an actual ending, yay!

  • @jayden-gh6gm
    @jayden-gh6gm 2 місяці тому +2

    The crow needs therapy after seing death for the 10th time

  • @ammarpratama1203
    @ammarpratama1203 4 роки тому +969

    Random farmer: Uses a gun like a club
    Me: *He a little bit confused, but he got the spirit*

    • @unherolike
      @unherolike 4 роки тому +48

      I think the idea is they were trying to take back control of the farm not kill all the animals.

    • @IAmTheStig32
      @IAmTheStig32 4 роки тому +14

      [laughs in 18th century soldier when he's just fired his one bullet]

    • @soul6733
      @soul6733 4 роки тому +10

      Laugh in WW2 soldiers who refused to shoot germans because afraid of them shooting back. In a war.

    • @YourMiddleBroPhil
      @YourMiddleBroPhil 3 роки тому +3

      Brings a whole new meaning to the term "gun club"

  • @roborabbit159
    @roborabbit159 5 років тому +534

    Actually the creepy song is really them trying to sing " Beasts of England "

    • @autistichades5552
      @autistichades5552 5 років тому +14

      Mades sense, The Russian Empire were allies with Britain(and France) until the blood covered their flag.

    • @mineboom7377
      @mineboom7377 5 років тому +7

      It even said that in the book.

    • @ayhemsellami9912
      @ayhemsellami9912 5 років тому +5

      Does anyone have the lyrics

    • @labellelace
      @labellelace 5 років тому +3

      Extra Funny Meme it’s in the book. You can probably find them online.

    • @rhiannonderen1757
      @rhiannonderen1757 5 років тому

      Duh..

  • @dh9228
    @dh9228 9 місяців тому

    Probably my favourite adult animated film ever, so glad you did a review of this

  • @whatthe5952
    @whatthe5952 11 місяців тому +5

    This used to be required reading in American schools . It is playing out in America right now in 2023.. This story has played out in history over and over again.

    • @thegameranch5935
      @thegameranch5935 10 місяців тому +1

      Pretty sure it still is, depends on the school of course

    • @Angela4Life2024
      @Angela4Life2024 8 місяців тому +1

      I recently read the book and watched this movie last year in english

    • @hiddendesire3076
      @hiddendesire3076 5 місяців тому +1

      E’yup. People blindly following causes they believe will make people more “equal”, while instead pushing racist policies and ideas. I’ve seen people cheering on segregated graduations, programs, etc for minorities. All the while claiming it is to empower them by giving them their own spaces. Meanwhile i’m over here shaking my head as democrats once again push Jim Crow styled policies. They’re even repeating what the Confederacy did to Abraham Lincoln by removing him from the ballots, but for Trump.

  • @JadeAnnabelArt
    @JadeAnnabelArt 3 роки тому +1633

    “They looked from man and pig, than from pig to man, and saw no difference.”
    I recently read the book myself and have been obsessed with everything surrounding it. I found that last line to be open ended, which helped the message. It offered a choice, it offered free thought. To come to your own conclusions.
    The animated version felt like what was expected. Starving animals don’t put up much of a fight, but a hundred of them will certainly take you down. A hundred starving slaves can kill a small group of slaves.
    The live action movie is the worst by far. It focused way too much on a single animal (Jessie), who (spoilers) dies of old age in the book without much fanfare. In the book, the puppies are take in plain sight, Napolean giving a half assed excuse, but the animals forget swiftly. In the movie Jessie constantly begs with them to no avail. She’s the main star and she won’t let you forget it. The ending is “Well we left and the elements took care of the pigs.” Which just suggests inaction is the answer.
    Animal Farm doesn’t need a main character. It’s not about the individuals, which is why the live action really rubbed me the wrong way. It’s about all the animals as a whole. The whole country/community.
    Anyway the animated movie gave the book justice. It gave the ending we expected the book to have after that chilling last line, and a satisfaction required of a visual media.

    • @mattoreo5854
      @mattoreo5854 2 роки тому +68

      Nah imo the ending ruined it. Them winning defeated the point. It was supposed to be a cautionary tale, but because the CIA got involved with the movie, it became about overthrowing bad governments. The message of a cycle of revolutions and oppression was defeated by them seemingly defeating communism and bringing forth democracy. I think the book ended where it was supposed to. The story was meant to make you sad, felling hopeless, not overjoyed that democracy rules... But that's just my opinion

    • @sebulller
      @sebulller 2 роки тому +4

      wait theres a live thing about this? huu

    • @AlarchyGaming
      @AlarchyGaming 2 роки тому +6

      I literally only watched the live action for patrick stewart and thats it

    • @saladasss2092
      @saladasss2092 2 роки тому +4

      why desn't the NK starving people do something about their situation? They are hundreds of starving people that are in that situation. Just, they don't have media.

    • @Billious
      @Billious 2 роки тому +30

      The live action was actually directed by a man who escaped the Soviet Union and saw its fall. Which is why the ending is the way it is.

  • @robertlopez2052
    @robertlopez2052 4 роки тому +554

    Snowball was such a good guy. I genuinely loved him. He was so kind, and he genuinely wanted to help out the animals.

    • @elainefillname9856
      @elainefillname9856 4 роки тому +30

      can you say the same for Trotsky?

    • @The-kr9rb
      @The-kr9rb 4 роки тому +92

      I mean, more or less he was. Trotsky himself is a bit more complicated, because he isn't a pig.

    • @noneofyourbeeswax01
      @noneofyourbeeswax01 4 роки тому +11

      @@elainefillname9856 Wasn't he supposed to be Lenin?

    • @noneofyourbeeswax01
      @noneofyourbeeswax01 4 роки тому +69

      @@The-kr9rb : _" Trotsky himself is a bit more complicated, because _*_he isn't a pig_*_ "_
      Dude... Spoilers!

    • @The-kr9rb
      @The-kr9rb 4 роки тому +4

      @@noneofyourbeeswax01 lol

  • @alwaysconfused1641
    @alwaysconfused1641 3 місяці тому +2

    I will say, the book does a wonderful job showing how Napoleon and Squealer (his right-hand) use propoganda to get the animals to believe everything they say. The animals don't just accept it; they are threatened by the dogs, given the idea of the old farmer coming back if they don't listen, and are blatantly gaslit over, and over, and over again. It's also noted that the large majority of animals can't read, and don't have good memory - which is why Squealer's gaslighting works so well.
    In the book, Squealer also trains the lesser educated, blindly loyal sheep to bleat "Four legs good, two legs bad!" every time someone wants to disagree with Napoleon, ensuring that his opposition's voices are literally never heard. By the end of the book, they are taught to bleat "four legs good, two legs BETTER!" as the pigs start walking on their hind legs.
    But this is comparing two completely different mediums. I think the movie loses the layers of symbolism the book has, but it still gets the message across. Plus all these extra details would have likely driven the movie way over budget.

  • @MellowAmaryllis
    @MellowAmaryllis 2 роки тому

    I’m happy I watched this back in 2021 in about November, because now I’m learning about animal farm, so I basically know a lot about this already. Thanks!

  • @monikaradzaj7407
    @monikaradzaj7407 5 років тому +313

    Animal Farm isn't aimed at kids though. It's aimed to a more adult audience.

    • @damiancampbell7534
      @damiancampbell7534 5 років тому +10

      Monika Radzaj That didnt stop me from reading the book in school when I was a kid.

    • @sem9165
      @sem9165 5 років тому +19

      it’s anti communism. which means it’s for everyone.

    • @MultiDiarmuid
      @MultiDiarmuid 5 років тому +17

      @@sem9165 It's Anti-Soviet, not anti-communist. There's a reason why Old Major and Snowball are portrayed sympathetically in the book.

    • @zladdykalash2125
      @zladdykalash2125 5 років тому

      I watched it in 5th grade, I disagree.

    • @nomem_dubium
      @nomem_dubium 5 років тому

      Well I saw it when I was 3
      Not a good idea , really

  • @Nukawin
    @Nukawin 5 років тому +384

    The moment where the slaughter truck took Boxer away always left me in tears, he was my favourite character throughout the movie. :(

    • @ferrugemalemao
      @ferrugemalemao 5 років тому +11

      That's when I stopped watching it as a kid. Never watched it again. The trauma was somehow "cured" when we read the book in English class when I was older.

    • @1945joshuaruiz
      @1945joshuaruiz 5 років тому +14

      That how it was tho
      If you stopped working the state doesn’t see you as useful anymore . You no longer have purpose .
      Either you and your family die from starvation or simply “disappear “

    • @onyxsavior7179
      @onyxsavior7179 5 років тому +11

      Napoleon the pig can go fuck himself

    • @Freefork
      @Freefork 5 років тому +1

      Boxer is the best animal in media, HANDS/HOOFS DOWN!

    • @jeffjeff1445
      @jeffjeff1445 5 років тому

      I've just finished reading the book for school it's really good

  • @randomnessanimation6831
    @randomnessanimation6831 2 роки тому +1

    My English class was assigned to read Animal Farm, and since I finished the book, thought it would be nice to be watching this video again!

  • @StanLeFox
    @StanLeFox 11 місяців тому +4

    Huh. I remember watching this at my grandma's house when i was 12 - 13 and I really enjoyed it. The wierdest part is that my grandma was kinda overly protective and she'd seen it many times before so I have no idea why she showed it to me... Like I said before I remember enjoying it and I didn't think it was that bad, but the strangest part is that I got scared / traumatised really easy at that age so I really have no idea.
    Edit: Just finished rewatching it, It really wasn't as bad as you made it out to be.

  • @sataniccat-girlwithagun3300
    @sataniccat-girlwithagun3300 3 роки тому +736

    Steve: You sickos
    Me: *Hold on, this whole operation was your idea*

    • @herraskanki1756
      @herraskanki1756 3 роки тому +4

      Allt í lagi.

    • @vibebk2174
      @vibebk2174 3 роки тому +10

      Steve: *and?*

    • @onyxsavior7179
      @onyxsavior7179 3 роки тому +2

      @@herraskanki1756 is this some foreign language I’m too American to understand?

    • @herraskanki1756
      @herraskanki1756 3 роки тому +4

      @@onyxsavior7179 Yes its Icelandic.

    • @onyxsavior7179
      @onyxsavior7179 3 роки тому +2

      @@herraskanki1756 oh thank you

  • @taliawtf6944
    @taliawtf6944 5 років тому +439

    Always be extremely wary of people claiming they can make a utopia or perfect world or system. More often than not they mean it will be perfect for them and no one else.

    • @anon9579
      @anon9579 5 років тому +18

      Utopia can never be

    • @rickmarr4478
      @rickmarr4478 5 років тому +25

      One's Utopia is Another's Dystopia.

    • @littlemoth4956
      @littlemoth4956 5 років тому +19

      Humanity is too vast of a species to be able to work together long enough to form a utopia.

    • @LazyPirate8
      @LazyPirate8 5 років тому +5

      Utopia stands for me myself and I. Not you!

    • @littlemoth4956
      @littlemoth4956 5 років тому

      @@LazyPirate8 But each person can call themselves "me myself and I."
      There are over 7 billion people in the world, you know.

  • @The-Viewer.
    @The-Viewer. Рік тому +2

    ''The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again, but already it was impossible to say which was which.''

  • @novastar6229
    @novastar6229 Рік тому +4

    10:12 that scene still hunts me till this day and I have 2 cats so I'm completely Terrified 😱😥

  • @insanemariobros4665
    @insanemariobros4665 3 роки тому +2501

    We read this book in my freshman year and, I’m not gonna lie, I actually enjoyed it. Yes it’s dark, but George Orwell had a thing for historical satire, and I found that compelling myself!

    • @vortigan9068
      @vortigan9068 3 роки тому +37

      ikr dark stuff is pretty interesting

    • @joeytofil2259
      @joeytofil2259 2 роки тому +20

      You might enjoy Chuck Palahniuk, he wrote Fight Club and his genre is twisted satire

    • @gabrielcastillo7638
      @gabrielcastillo7638 2 роки тому +6

      I read the book in my freshman year and it's great

    • @lukedanuser
      @lukedanuser 2 роки тому +9

      Read it yesterday and it was fascinating, couldn’t put it down.

    • @snakezlair6671
      @snakezlair6671 2 роки тому +3

      Same with me

  • @etps4444
    @etps4444 4 роки тому +685

    11:18
    My initial thought was, "Where did they get the red paint?" and then, ".... Oh."

  • @wieldylattice3015
    @wieldylattice3015 Рік тому +2

    8:14 well if we consider the book canon, then yes he is, actually

  • @person4579
    @person4579 Рік тому +5

    3:12 So nobody is going to talk about old major lip syncing?

  • @saturnalia3335
    @saturnalia3335 5 років тому +517

    See but here’s the gag: they didn’t actually revolt in the original book so it was even more depressing

    • @benchmarking6875
      @benchmarking6875 5 років тому +29

      That is because the book was made in 1945

    • @barrettfenwick8028
      @barrettfenwick8028 5 років тому +58

      They couldn't show the Totalitarian Commie winning in the middle of the Cold War. The CIA actually had a decent amount of input on this film!

    • @monkofdarktimes
      @monkofdarktimes 5 років тому +26

      Its the last 5 minutes of the first flim that the CIA affected

    • @Redbird-dh7mu
      @Redbird-dh7mu 5 років тому +20

      Yeah, the point of the book is to not give away your freedoms because you might not get them back.

    • @Nyerguds
      @Nyerguds 5 років тому +3

      Would be funnier if they were taken over by the cows and the whole cycle just started again :p

  • @T-minus-infinite
    @T-minus-infinite 3 роки тому +665

    The creepy chanting is where the animals sing a song in the book
    Edit: In the book the animals justify wings counting as legs because wings are used for movement like legs but arms aren't used to walk

    • @testerwulf3357
      @testerwulf3357 3 роки тому +32

      Anything used for travel is a leg to them basically.

    • @seanmacguire3324
      @seanmacguire3324 2 роки тому +20

      Beasts of England ,
      Beasts of Ireland,

    • @whitedragoness23
      @whitedragoness23 2 роки тому +11

      Eh, either way wings are features humans don’t have so I guess the wording animal characteristics wouldn’t have flowed nicely with the pigs transformation

    • @LocalIdiot388
      @LocalIdiot388 2 роки тому +2

      They are probably singing (In My Opinion) "The Internationale"

    • @T-minus-infinite
      @T-minus-infinite 2 роки тому

      @@seanmacguire3324 yes that was it

  • @StaceyIsles
    @StaceyIsles 2 роки тому +4

    Around 01:17 I thought you were going to say happy tree friends 🤣

  • @swollenheadofdragon832
    @swollenheadofdragon832 Рік тому +3

    9:29 Yeah, you might think the pigs just changed the rules because they wanted to, but you said it was almost the case, so it really was just always there. It's not like they actually used that bucket of paint to add to rules there or anything because again "almost as if".

  • @Iceclaw77
    @Iceclaw77 5 років тому +241

    I would say that while Animal Farm isn't supposed to be a children's book, I can understand why people would (at first glance) think that it is. The language and prose used in it (for the most part) is simple to understand, the plot is easy to follow, the book's length is short compared to most other novels, and even the title gives the impression that it is for a much younger audience.
    Tl;dr: Animal Farm is an allegory for the rise of the USSR disguised as a novel for adults disguised as a children's book.

    • @jerm70
      @jerm70 5 років тому +2

      Eh, its meant to be a kid's book, its just that the modern day standards of child's book is so skewed to where not even Peter Pan is a kid's book.

    • @honest_126
      @honest_126 5 років тому

      @@jerm70 if it is, it's for children probably, PROBABLY, for kids in a middle school level on.

    • @jerm70
      @jerm70 5 років тому

      @@honest_126 Instead of is replace it with was. Past tense. Kids are baby'd nowadays.

    • @garfieif8187
      @garfieif8187 5 років тому +2

      It's for kids and adults alike. Kids deserve to read things with depth and meaning, too, and the value of thinking for yourself is one that isn't taught nearly enough.

    • @Da_Swifta
      @Da_Swifta 5 років тому

      Couldn't have said it better meself mate

  • @lordstumpy2945
    @lordstumpy2945 3 роки тому +727

    Even as a kid though I feel like animal farm tells an especially important story, or moral rather, that should be taught more often to children as propaganda, though maybe not as harmful, is still very rife today and thinking for yourself in a world where everyone is more easily influenced by the media is still as important as it always was.

    • @Shlankyman545
      @Shlankyman545 3 роки тому +11

      I love you and this comment

    • @jaskitstepkit7153
      @jaskitstepkit7153 3 роки тому +43

      It's a warning about greed creating tyranny while undermining every noble cause

    • @elltheclown4285
      @elltheclown4285 2 роки тому +6

      I agree, i was forced to read the book for school and i liked it my biggest complaint is how all the characters are one dimensional

    • @shannonmcelroy8454
      @shannonmcelroy8454 2 роки тому +6

      @@elltheclown4285 I agree, I won't lie about the book's simplicity, and the characters being less developed. Although in the story's context, I feel it is justified given that it's more story focused than character focused. George Orwell often wrote because he wanted to give an important message, and in this case there are times where more developed characters can overwhelm the story and make the reader less inclined to listen when the characters are put through the wringer. By distancing the reader from the depths of character feelings, it helps them swallow the more unsavory features of the story.

  • @MrDGK
    @MrDGK 9 місяців тому +1

    So this year my drama class performed Animal Farm in front of like 100 people, it was a fun time - I got to portray Boxer and it was a fun time (I miss the rehearsals I had with the others it was a fun time) and we got a lot of positive reception. One of the guys who portrayed Squealer is a really good performer and had this frightening presence on stage.

  • @thesmilingman7576
    @thesmilingman7576 Рік тому +1

    5:33 you actually almost got me for a moment as usually this joke doesn't go on for that long

  • @Mafon2
    @Mafon2 5 років тому +259

    there's a joke in X-Men, where guards mocking Beast for reading kiddie book "Animal Farm".

  • @cthulhufhtagn2483
    @cthulhufhtagn2483 4 роки тому +305

    7:08 The exact phrase the pig uses in the book is that the wing "is an organ of locomotion, rather than manipulation", which works well enough for me.

    • @darthvader2994
      @darthvader2994 4 роки тому +7

      yea i don't get why they didn't just keep that in rather than just "wings = legs"

    • @rhiannonm6022
      @rhiannonm6022 4 роки тому

      @@darthvader2994 because it's a 'kids' movie and that would be too confusing

  • @dukedevlan5457
    @dukedevlan5457 Рік тому +3

    4:58 to be fair boars/pigs will fight even when morality wounded that why the Black knight from monty python symbol is a boar

  • @negativeforce3863
    @negativeforce3863 2 роки тому +9

    The book is really good, and managed to portray a real issue very well