Hello guys. As described, I am only concerned with an objective comparison of the capabilities of the two addons. Test.exe, malware or other topics from the past are not the topic. Please note this. I will remove any comments, as they are not effective.
@@s34x You're the first I've read say that being in the industry. Everyone else I've read in the industry says the Fenix has more accurate sounding including airbus pilots.
Why release A321ceo when we already have a fantastic Fenix out there???? FsLabs should have made A321Neo, that would bring them good sales figures in MSFS.
The maintenance and fault system seems to be the only advantage FSLabs has right now. Even if their indications and flight model could be more accurate, when both are so close to authentic does it really matter? FSLabs should have gone for the A330 or 787.
Yeah FSLabs should have gone for a NEO, there isn't a study level version of the A320neo family. I have the Fenix, I love the fenix, the FSL a321 costs nearly as much as both the Fenix A320 and the 319/21 expansion. No reason to buy it
Just FYI thats engine 2 you showed and not 1. Engine 1 is on the port side (left). It makes a different for this aircraft since the hydraulics exanple green are dependent on engine 1
The idle sound of the IAE's from the front of the FSLabs version sounds more realistic. But the spool up sounds on the Fenix better and when you are looking from the back of the engines when idling they sound perfect on the Fenix like in real life. I have all 3 Fenix planes and the Idle sound is verry quite especially when FSLTL is working. When the Inibuilds A300 PW4000 engines are ideling you can't hear any other plane near also with FSLTL on.
In my opinion the sound of the Fenix is more accurate. This high pitch sound (like the sound that the tires of a semi produce when it’s driving on the highway, at sec 4:46) of the FSlabs 321 is in my opinion not that accurate. But maybe it’s just a bit too loud or anything.
FSL wins hands down on a number of feature, not just the MEL items. Depth of simulation. Not based on a 737 flight model as per Fenix. Number of failures tied to aircraft usage. GSX integration. Should I go on?
@@fubar8560 I don't care about where the flight model is from, if multiple real pilots have reported that the Fenix flight model is better and that the FSL has a real pitch issue. Also in terms of failures and gsx integration, I would assume that Fenix has a lot to come still.
Neither have the correct sound, although not bad. When starting an IAE or CFM engine there is a clear "Vlouf!" when the fuel is ignited and about the same when engine is shut down. Here we have only a very linear spool up / spool down effect. Hopefully they will correct this.
Hello guys. As described, I am only concerned with an objective comparison of the capabilities of the two addons. Test.exe, malware or other topics from the past are not the topic. Please note this. I will remove any comments, as they are not effective.
Fenix is just perfect
The CFM and IAE from FsLabs are much closer to reality than those from Fenix. And yes, I can judge that because I work with aircraft almost every day
@@s34x You're the first I've read say that being in the industry. Everyone else I've read in the industry says the Fenix has more accurate sounding including airbus pilots.
@GeminiJets37 he's probably referring to the numerical calculations. Regardless though Fenix is a better value because I already own it.
@@s34xrealistic in what regard?
@@s34xdo you work for fslabs by any chance
Love the fact that with the Fenix you heard the hydraulics pressurise.
Why release A321ceo when we already have a fantastic Fenix out there???? FsLabs should have made A321Neo, that would bring them good sales figures in MSFS.
we already have the inibuilds a321LR
@@pelail thats not study level though
@@pelail so its not even that good imo
@@pelail Inibuilds A321LR is semi default aircraft because it´s part of aircraft package in FS2024. Can´t compare it to Fenix or Fslabs.
The maintenance and fault system seems to be the only advantage FSLabs has right now. Even if their indications and flight model could be more accurate, when both are so close to authentic does it really matter? FSLabs should have gone for the A330 or 787.
Exactly most of their fanbase don't wanna hold them accountable. They should've done the NEO then gone to the A340 or A330
or 320 neo
Or the A340
Yeah FSLabs should have gone for a NEO, there isn't a study level version of the A320neo family.
I have the Fenix, I love the fenix, the FSL a321 costs nearly as much as both the Fenix A320 and the 319/21 expansion. No reason to buy it
Fenix fan for life... ❤
Just FYI thats engine 2 you showed and not 1. Engine 1 is on the port side (left). It makes a different for this aircraft since the hydraulics exanple green are dependent on engine 1
@@denziiey Yes of course, its engine 2. My fault. But I think, for a sound comparsion it doesn't matter.
@MrEmbargo1985 true
The idle sound of the IAE's from the front of the FSLabs version sounds more realistic. But the spool up sounds on the Fenix better and when you are looking from the back of the engines when idling they sound perfect on the Fenix like in real life. I have all 3 Fenix planes and the Idle sound is verry quite especially when FSLTL is working. When the Inibuilds A300 PW4000 engines are ideling you can't hear any other plane near also with FSLTL on.
I realize how beautiful and how well made the phoenix is. I hope Fenix can make an E190 E2
i highly, highly doubt they would ever do that
In my opinion the sound of the Fenix is more accurate.
This high pitch sound (like the sound that the tires of a semi produce when it’s driving on the highway, at sec 4:46) of the FSlabs 321 is in my opinion not that accurate. But maybe it’s just a bit too loud or anything.
4:58 FSLabs engine sound more deep than Fenix. ¿No? But Fenix engine sound more realistic than FSLabs.
Great sounds. 😍😍
Do they both have IAE and CFM?
@@brosaviation Yes, they have.
@@embargo85_aka_SilentPilotCould you also make comparison with the CFM engines?
@ Yes, its work in progress.
I like the fslabs engine startup sound but fenix is more realistic sound
who more realistic is the winner
@ agreed
FsLabs is simply not better. MEL is just the only upper hand which I think will come to the fénix now
FSL wins hands down on a number of feature, not just the MEL items.
Depth of simulation.
Not based on a 737 flight model as per Fenix.
Number of failures tied to aircraft usage.
GSX integration.
Should I go on?
@@fubar8560 I don't care about where the flight model is from, if multiple real pilots have reported that the Fenix flight model is better and that the FSL has a real pitch issue.
Also in terms of failures and gsx integration, I would assume that Fenix has a lot to come still.
@@jonahmaikranz2576 "I don't care about where the flight model is from"
No arguing with that kind of reply. Just shows the lack of knowledge🤣
@@jonahmaikranz2576 which reports from pilots say that the FSLabs has a worse flight model?
Neither have the correct sound, although not bad. When starting an IAE or CFM engine there is a clear "Vlouf!" when the fuel is ignited and about the same when engine is shut down. Here we have only a very linear spool up / spool down effect. Hopefully they will correct this.
dlss terrible graphics.