Another big difference is the compression on jpeg. Raw saves the actual data from a sensor. Jpeg looks at block of pixels en finds a pattern that looks kind of like it and only safes that. Thats fine for socialmedia but when you start editing them they fall apart
That’s a huge oversimplification and only one aspect. Raw is essentially the raw data from the sensor. So there’s no compression, and there’s no colour correction either as opposed to jpeg. The lack of compression also means you can more easily change things like exposure after the fact, because compression strips out high frequency low amplitude details.
I have at least a half dozen other shorts or videos you can check out that mention other aspects of RAW photos. This video was a specific response to someone who asked about RAW photos in relation to bit depth.
It depends on what you're shooting... If you shoot for fine art sales or coffee table books you shoot raw. If you're a photojournalist where speed is necessary you shoot Jpeg as they are smaller files and quicker to send to your publisher. But if you're, say a sports photographer where you want a file to sent to publishers quickly, but would also like to sell posters or a book later, you shoot Raw+Jpeg which gives you 2 files for each shot you take... But, have lots of cards with you as it will eat up a lot of space quickly!
The three colour panel representing raw stands for the likes of your 3CCD on an intermediate level camcorder with a microphone on top or if it was these days for instance 3CMOS.
Raw can be 8 bit too, and used to be . Adding bits to each color channel of each pixel gets you HDR (High Dynamic Range) . JPEG/MPEG throws away details to make file size smaller, and was designed so the lost details look blurry to the human brain . Raw does nothing to the image, but keeps all the data so you can use a better computer to keep what you want later .
Could you tell us about photo stacking? I saw stacked images of Andromeda and some cool landscape photos with high contrast but still keeping the information in the dark spots. How is that done? Can you do that with bad cameras like eos 600d? Thanks!
Can you please quickly explain the differences between the bit formats, as my camera itself says I take photos with 10 bit, but windows says it's 96 bit
Define “better”. Jpegs are certainly better for me. I’m simple and shoot Fujifilm. But not to a guy who likes to sit in front of his computer all day. For paid work it’s smart. Raw looks horrible until you spend the time to adjust them. I don’t enjoy that. I only shoot raw if I come across a fascinating scene which I could turn into the photo of the year.
Another big difference is the compression on jpeg. Raw saves the actual data from a sensor. Jpeg looks at block of pixels en finds a pattern that looks kind of like it and only safes that. Thats fine for socialmedia but when you start editing them they fall apart
I don’t think anyone can explain it better than him 👍🏻
True
That’s a huge oversimplification and only one aspect. Raw is essentially the raw data from the sensor. So there’s no compression, and there’s no colour correction either as opposed to jpeg. The lack of compression also means you can more easily change things like exposure after the fact, because compression strips out high frequency low amplitude details.
I have at least a half dozen other shorts or videos you can check out that mention other aspects of RAW photos. This video was a specific response to someone who asked about RAW photos in relation to bit depth.
It depends on what you're shooting...
If you shoot for fine art sales or coffee table books you shoot raw.
If you're a photojournalist where speed is necessary you shoot Jpeg as they are smaller files and quicker to send to your publisher.
But if you're, say a sports photographer where you want a file to sent to publishers quickly, but would also like to sell posters or a book later, you shoot Raw+Jpeg which gives you 2 files for each shot you take... But, have lots of cards with you as it will eat up a lot of space quickly!
Loved your explanation🙌
I learned something today! Thanks
Make a video about a nikon d5000 series camera
nice. i had no idea. thank you!
The three colour panel representing raw stands for the likes of your 3CCD on an intermediate level camcorder with a microphone on top or if it was these days for instance 3CMOS.
Thank you for the information.
You're doing good work.
Thanks alot for the information 🎉
Raw can be 8 bit too, and used to be . Adding bits to each color channel of each pixel gets you HDR (High Dynamic Range) . JPEG/MPEG throws away details to make file size smaller, and was designed so the lost details look blurry to the human brain . Raw does nothing to the image, but keeps all the data so you can use a better computer to keep what you want later .
We use raw CAs it’s easier to edit
Could you tell us about photo stacking? I saw stacked images of Andromeda and some cool landscape photos with high contrast but still keeping the information in the dark spots. How is that done? Can you do that with bad cameras like eos 600d? Thanks!
When will you announce the OnePlus 12 winner in the contest
Can you please quickly explain the differences between the bit formats, as my camera itself says I take photos with 10 bit, but windows says it's 96 bit
Most of my friends took pics in jpg
Hi I'm looking for a first telephoto lense that doesn't break the bank. Do you have any recommendations?
Do a UA-cam search. Best. / Cheap./ Telephoto. ( Do you need a zoom, or fixed length. 🤷🏻♀️
Photographers usually shoot in RAW right?
only problem is 5 photos is a terabyte of storage 😂
NO!! MY CAMERA DOES NOT HAVE A RAW OPTION. Hml
Raw dogging the photo.
Yes JPG has much more details than Raw and it's better
You have that backwards mate!
Define “better”. Jpegs are certainly better for me. I’m simple and shoot Fujifilm.
But not to a guy who likes to sit in front of his computer all day. For paid work it’s smart.
Raw looks horrible until you spend the time to adjust them. I don’t enjoy that.
I only shoot raw if I come across a fascinating scene which I could turn into the photo of the year.
@@Koji-888 exactly