Prime Lens Shootout 35mm vs 50mm

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
  • On today's episode of PhotoKitchen we put the 35mm against the 50mm in the battle of the standard primes lenses to see which is best for you as a photographer.
    While the 50mm is more affordable, available, and in some cases with better technology, the 35mm is the Chef's kiss of a lens.
    We break down the pros and cons of both focal lengths, to see what is best for you as a photographer.
    Link to the Portrait Lens Shootout:
    • ULTIMATE PORTRAIT LENS...
    My name is M.D. Welch, and I am the humble host of PhotoKitchen. The UA-cam channel dedicated to all things photo, video, and image editing.
    New episodes are live every week. Please like, subscribe and share!
    My Website:
    www.depth-of-field.com/
    Follow me on Instagram:
    / mdwelch_photo
    Hey I am on Twitter too:
    / md_welch
    I also teach:
    www.depth-of-field.com/p/educ...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @fuzzytalz
    @fuzzytalz 2 дні тому

    Great, informative video! Thanks for taking the time to share your expertise and perspective.

  • @adventure_photo
    @adventure_photo 26 днів тому

    Nice run down on both focal lengths! I love those two prime lenses and own both as well.

  • @rascalhusky8129
    @rascalhusky8129 26 днів тому

    Excellent information. Thanks

  • @hellyeahyoudid
    @hellyeahyoudid 15 днів тому

    Absolutely love this video! The 50mm prime lens is such a fantastic choice. Your passion for it really shines through, and I couldn't agree more with everything you said. It's my go-to lens for capturing stunning portraits and everyday moments with such clarity and beautiful depth of field. Thanks for sharing your love for this amazing lens!

  • @1337ghomri
    @1337ghomri 26 днів тому

    Great and informative video! I have a 24mm and 50mm prime lens. I wish I had a 35mm on many occasions.

    • @PhotoKitchen425
      @PhotoKitchen425  26 днів тому +1

      I had the 24mm for a few months, and found it was too wide for portraits, but not wide enough for landscapes. I ended up selling it, and getting a 20mm. I do wonder if having a wider zoom would be a good idea, but I hate the weight of a the 14-24 and just don't have a need that often for it, so it is a 35/50 combo for me . . .for the moment. Thank you for watching.

  • @richardsimms251
    @richardsimms251 26 днів тому +1

    Very good video

  • @aliriveraphotography
    @aliriveraphotography 27 днів тому

    Oh! I'll go put that 35mm on order!

  • @TCImagery
    @TCImagery 26 днів тому

    What about on a crop sensor?

    • @PhotoKitchen425
      @PhotoKitchen425  26 днів тому +1

      I am going to try to NOT sound like an arrogant photo snob when I say this, but I am not a crop sensor shooter, so I am not sure. The definition of crop sensor varies, but you might take the crop factor of your sensor and then find the 35 and 50mm equivalent. Sorry I can be of more help. Thank you for watching.

    • @kennygeorgeonline
      @kennygeorgeonline 25 днів тому +2

      There are some good technical notes about crop sensors on the web. I shot a 1.5x Nikon APC for a few years. A 24 becomes a 36... A 35 becomes a 52.5. For depth of field, they are not as shallow as on a full sized sensor. Meaning, a 1.4 lens on a crop sensor performs about like a 2.0. Therefore, if you want to separate the background, you have to get a really large aperture lens. But, because often a crop sensor camera is a lower priced camera, they don't make really big 1.0 aperture lenses to give you the 1.4 equivalent. I shot 4x5 back in the 70's. A 4.5 f number on that lens was super shallow.
      Google depth-of-field articles vs. sensor size and focal length.
      Aside from depth of field difference, all of the perspective discussion from the video work. Just do the math and use a 24 vs 35 for your photography. You'll have the same "perspective." Great video discussion.

  • @kennygeorgeonline
    @kennygeorgeonline 25 днів тому

    A small note about the 35 being close to a 40 field of view but a little wider.... If you ever make prints in the old formats, 5x7, 8x10, the 35mm excels. The side cropping means the 35 performs like a 40 does in the 2x3 format of the sensor. Please don't take my 35mm away! You already took my Kodachrome!

    • @PhotoKitchen425
      @PhotoKitchen425  25 днів тому +1

      Thank you for watching. I and have no part in the taking of Kodachrome or the 35mm.

    • @kengeorge6965
      @kengeorge6965 20 днів тому +1

      @@PhotoKitchen425 LOL! Great comparison. Thanks. It was so good that I ordered the 35mm Z 1.8 for my Nikon Z8! My old F-Mount 35mm f/2.0 manual lens just didn't make sense.

    • @PhotoKitchen425
      @PhotoKitchen425  19 днів тому

      Sounds like a great purchase @@kengeorge6965 Thank you for watching.

  • @stkuj
    @stkuj 20 днів тому

    I've always felt the 50 is MEH. So, I bought one (Sony 50 1.2) and used it for almost a year (last year) to see if that opinion changed. The beginning of this year, I sold it. I still feel it MEH. It's a jack of all trades and master of none.

    • @PhotoKitchen425
      @PhotoKitchen425  20 днів тому

      Not going to disagree with that at all. I am 50/50 on the 50mm, but there are times where it really shines. I just found a image from a shooter 4 years ago that I shot on a 55mm and I really loved it. I can see how there is love and meh on the 50. Thank you for watching.