Harvard Professor Avi Loeb on Signs of Life Beyond Earth

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 кві 2024
  • Harvard Professor Avi Loeb on Signs of Life Beyond Earth. The Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science explains meteorites, interstellar objects, and his ocean expedition to find materials left over from a meteorite in the Pacific Ocean.
    Read more:
    www.harvardmagazine.com/2013/...
    www.harvardmagazine.com/2013/...
    www.harvardmagazine.com/2013/...
    www.harvardmagazine.com/2016/...
    Medium | Avi Loeb
    / avi-loeb
    Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
    lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/mo...
    The Galileo Project
    www.cfa.harvard.edu/research/...
    The Galileo Project homepage
    projects.iq.harvard.edu/galileo
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 49

  • @alanwhiplington5504
    @alanwhiplington5504 26 днів тому +8

    He's basically right. The universe is so large, and so old, and the chemistry of life is literally spread between the stars - of course there is life out there, and intelligent life too.

  • @user-fj2zc9iz5u
    @user-fj2zc9iz5u 15 днів тому +3

    We're waiting for a description and analysis of the evidence you collected from your sailing trip.

  • @SkinwalkerFarm
    @SkinwalkerFarm 25 днів тому +2

    Thanks Avi

  • @WendySwearingen
    @WendySwearingen 25 днів тому +2

    So interesting. Sound could be improved--very echo-y.

  • @hapaart
    @hapaart 23 дні тому +2

    😎Cool Speech.

  • @Hayds0
    @Hayds0 16 днів тому +1

    Is the betz sphere potentially related to the material you found?? Similar looking just different size

  • @rezazulhairy4170
    @rezazulhairy4170 22 дні тому +2

    Human is in dimension 3. And alien is in dimension 4 above. They have high not just in technology but also high in spirituality.

    • @azzzzr
      @azzzzr 20 днів тому

      West is more technologically advanced than East. Is West more spiritual?

  • @etbedtalksAOH
    @etbedtalksAOH 26 днів тому +4

    Avi, If someone has been here for 80 years without disclosing anything, then they are not a visitor.

    • @stevedwyer8333
      @stevedwyer8333 24 дні тому +1

      If it took them a thousand years to get here, 80 years could be considered to be a visit.

    • @sentientflower7891
      @sentientflower7891 21 день тому

      ​@@stevedwyer8333the minimum interstellar travel time is measured in millions of years.

    • @azzzzr
      @azzzzr 20 днів тому

      @@stevedwyer8333 if humans fly for thousands of years and found a beautiful and resourceful planet there with technologically and mentally undeveloped beings there, would we just come back without taking advantage of that planet? Especially if the resources in our planets were heavily depleted because of our technological advancement?

    • @stevedwyer8333
      @stevedwyer8333 15 днів тому

      ​@sentientflower7891 I almost said, "If it takes them thousands or millions of years to get here, their time here could be considered a visit even if they stayed here for for a long time in human terms." But even the New Horizons spacecraft could get to Alpha Centauri in 80,000 years, so the minimum time for interstellar travel for an advanced civilization would certainly be less than 1,000 years. But yes, some trips could take millions of years.

    • @sentientflower7891
      @sentientflower7891 15 днів тому

      @@stevedwyer8333 New Horizon cannot get to Alpha Centaur in 80,000 years. That's not how visiting another star system works. If you want to attain orbit around Alpha Centauri you can get there in a thousand years but you will have to slow down in order to attain orbit around the star and that maneuver alone will take 100,000 years.

  • @JuvoII
    @JuvoII 26 днів тому +2

    Professor David Sinclair, Professor Claudine Gay, Professor Benjamin Edelman, Professor Avi Loeb.
    Harvard is becoming the Donald Trump of Universities.

  • @mrtienphysics666
    @mrtienphysics666 22 дні тому +1

    So aliens have visited earth?

    • @sentientflower7891
      @sentientflower7891 21 день тому

      Avi Loeb knows, he is an extraterrestrial. Technically an illegal alien though the boundary he crossed was the stratosphere.

  • @user-fj2zc9iz5u
    @user-fj2zc9iz5u 15 днів тому

    What? What? Where is the explanation of his sailing trip and evidence analysis? This huckster is shameless.

    • @mwazra6625
      @mwazra6625 7 днів тому

      It takes time to analyze rigorously something that contains such noisy data. I am waiting for the analysis to come to make my mind. What makes you so skeptical when we know so little about what he is talking about? He is saying something that could be and probability is on his side.

    • @user-fj2zc9iz5u
      @user-fj2zc9iz5u 7 днів тому

      @@mwazra6625 you sound like a Christian ignoring everything that disproves what you want to believe in. The church of interdimensional Avi.

  • @ignaciourena5692
    @ignaciourena5692 18 днів тому

    Professor Avi Loeb I really don't understand what kind of evidence you need ...

  • @realsydney7327
    @realsydney7327 26 днів тому

    Nope. Wrong. No life out there.

    • @Cheddarturd
      @Cheddarturd 26 днів тому +1

      Hahahahahahahahaha

    • @RobertStek
      @RobertStek 25 днів тому +5

      Thanks for that well-informed, logical, and scientific refutation of Loeb's informed speculation.

    • @realsydney7327
      @realsydney7327 25 днів тому

      @@RobertStekThere's no evidence of life external to Earth.

    • @RobertStek
      @RobertStek 25 днів тому +4

      @@realsydney7327 Your first remark was a fallacious appeal to ignorance. You conclude that life external to Earth is not possible because it hasn't been proven conclusively true. Loeb's arguments are largely probabilistic based on possible interpretations of accepted evidence. That doesn't make them true, but he is a scientist hypothesizing and looking for additional evidence. Your second response is also fallacious reasoning. You cannot conclude that absence of evidence is evidence of absence.

    • @mwazra6625
      @mwazra6625 6 днів тому

      Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. If there isn't the burden of proof is on your side - what is your evidence?