Most Deadly Next Generation Weapons of the US Military 3D

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 жов 2023
  • USS John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Aircraft Carrier has arrived !
    Most Deadly Next Generation Weapons of the US Military 3D
    Featuring
    *** NGCV ***
    *** Next Generation Combat Vehicle ***
    M10 Booker
    ACV Amphibious Combat Vehicle
    XM30
    AMPV Armored Multi-purposed Vehicle
    RCV-L Robotic Combat Vehicle Light
    Ripsaw M5 RCV-M Robotic Combat Vehicle Medium
    AbramsX Decisive Lethality Platform DLP
    Abrams M1A2 SEPv3
    XM1299 Extended Ranged Cannon
    *** FTUAS ***
    *** Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System ***
    V-BAT
    FVR-90
    Volansi VOLY 50
    Aerosande HQ
    Griffon Valiant
    Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie
    MQ-28 Ghost Bat
    MQ-20 Avenger ER
    *** FARA ***
    *** Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft ***
    AVX/L3
    Karem AR40
    Boeing FARA
    Bell 360 Invictus
    Sikorsky Raider X
    MD 969
    UH-60V Black Hawk
    Sikorsky VH-92 Patriot
    *** FLRAA ***
    *** Future Long Range Assault Aircraft ***
    SB-1 Defiant
    Bell V-280 Valor
    *** LRS-B ***
    *** Long Range Strike Bomber ***
    B-52J
    B-1R Lancer
    B-21 Raider
    *** NGAD ***
    *** Next Generation Air Dominance ***
    F-15EX Eagle II
    F-16 Block 70/72
    F-35 Lightning II
    F/A-XX
    F-36 Kingsnake
    NGAD
    SR-72
    Block V Virginia-class
    Columbia-class
    Flight III Arleigh Burke-class
    Constellation-class frigate
    Zumwalt-class Destroyer
    USS John F. Kennedy CVN-79
    𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗖
    My Spirit Is Free by Whitesand
    • Sad Dramatic Emotional...
    Era of War by MultiMusic
    • [Copyright Free Orches...
    Epic Battle Speech by Wayne Jones
    A Fallen Cowboy
    Final Boss by Myuu
    𝟯𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗦
    - own creations
    - 3D Warehouse (Awesome)
    Per section 1.B.ii of the 3D Warehouse TOC - "Combined Work"
    Like, Share and Subscribe to 𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗩𝗶𝘇
    www.amazingviz.net/
    Help me Grow this Channel
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 110

  • @k-874
    @k-874 8 місяців тому +20

    New Ace Combat DLC looking great!

  • @barbusbogdan7
    @barbusbogdan7 9 місяців тому +11

    Next next gen unmanned aircraft carrier with unmanned aircrafts. Damn

  • @Desire123ification
    @Desire123ification 9 місяців тому +2

    Awesome Video! 💯

  • @cosmolfjr7400
    @cosmolfjr7400 8 місяців тому

    top top top... congratulations from brasil !!!!

  • @themacsthecameraman5383
    @themacsthecameraman5383 9 місяців тому +10

    Sadly B-1R was cancelled a long time ago :(

    • @AmazingViz
      @AmazingViz  9 місяців тому +3

      imaging B-1R with F-22 engine. 😁

    • @chonglizermoe
      @chonglizermoe 8 місяців тому

      ​@@AmazingVizyou forgot DDG X

  • @joshuawarwick7881
    @joshuawarwick7881 9 місяців тому +36

    The us isn't getting the ghost bat it's Australian

    • @Leo-Orbis
      @Leo-Orbis 9 місяців тому +8

      Yes, but, "In August 2022 it was revealed by United States Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall that preliminary discussions were being held into purchasing the MQ-28 for United States service."

    • @DOSFS
      @DOSFS 8 місяців тому +2

      They can, and they submit preliminary discussions and studies with Boeing to see if this is compatible with US needs or not. If it is, then they might buy it.

    • @mattyice2099
      @mattyice2099 8 місяців тому +4

      But it's made in the U.S by Boeing. Plus i think recently we decided to purchase it for the airforce.

    • @razgary8008
      @razgary8008 8 місяців тому +2

      The us is also getting the ghost bat

    • @joshuawarwick7881
      @joshuawarwick7881 8 місяців тому +2

      @mattyice2099 no it's not. There are only 2 that exist, and they are being made in Australia

  • @Windiermirror
    @Windiermirror 7 місяців тому +1

    The buff is still standing

  • @1billionyearsand713
    @1billionyearsand713 8 місяців тому +4

    Can you make part 2 for land vehicles like next generation trucks and next generation C130 or heavylift aircraft

  • @TeoDP7
    @TeoDP7 8 місяців тому +4

    The Cold War 2.0 is on…

  • @tankhang727
    @tankhang727 8 місяців тому

    You forgot the RAH66-Comanche bro, your videos are good, keep trying😊👍

  • @albatross8361
    @albatross8361 9 місяців тому +15

    A very interesting and well made video ! But if the US could fix things so that we could all just get along, that would probably be a lot cheaper...

    • @TeoDP7
      @TeoDP7 8 місяців тому +1

      I think There’s a lot, A LOT of problems which are blocking that from happening…

    • @albatross8361
      @albatross8361 8 місяців тому +1

      @@TeoDP7 I think so too, but the US has been bleeding blood and treasure for over 20 years. Real diplomacy seems to have been forgotten. Technology is exciting, but if all it leads to is war being seen an easy solution to problems then that technology does not represent real progress.

    • @stevenwynn7162
      @stevenwynn7162 6 місяців тому

      I would have said that’s a bunch of bullshit around 20 years ago while sitting in Iraq but as I have gotten older it’s clear that we keep causing issues around the world… Everything we touch ends up worse off than before we got involved and that applies to everything from Vietnam forward… I also challenge anyone to make a war we won since the Korean War? The only one that can even be remotely seen as a victory is the first Gulf War… Look at how Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Haiti, Ukraine and hell even go back to Cuba with the Bay of Pigs debacle… Whats happened is war becomes a way for a lot of elites/politicians to make money at the expense of other peoples lives… None of these places we intervene with affect our National Security and most of not all of the conflicts are ones we instigated..

  • @Braydenthegr8
    @Braydenthegr8 9 місяців тому +3

    I saw the john f Kennedy in San Diego last year

  • @astranger8569
    @astranger8569 8 місяців тому +1

    the US army is getting stronger

  • @nassimtahraoui6287
    @nassimtahraoui6287 6 місяців тому +1

    The algirien air force video 📹👌

  • @angeloicaro661
    @angeloicaro661 9 місяців тому +1

    I read the FTUAS as futas

  • @superfrycook6360
    @superfrycook6360 5 днів тому

    What’s next, next generation infantry and special forces?

  • @vigoedwinpandika1545
    @vigoedwinpandika1545 Місяць тому

    1:20 that looks like from transformers decepticon brawl

  • @hartatimarzuki9886
    @hartatimarzuki9886 8 місяців тому +2

    Most deadly next generation weapons of Russian military 3D in the next video

    • @Ksescel
      @Ksescel 8 місяців тому +3

      Like what? A piece of granite or something?

  • @1billionyearsand713
    @1billionyearsand713 9 місяців тому +7

    Imagine America's military is going in the year 3000s

  • @TheAmericanEagle_2024
    @TheAmericanEagle_2024 2 місяці тому +1

    The Bell 360 is supposed be Cancelled but I don’t know the truth

  • @hornet8364
    @hornet8364 9 місяців тому +1

    man, i really hope the Valor and the NGAD survive the black hole that is USAF procurement

    • @Yuki_Ika7
      @Yuki_Ika7 8 місяців тому

      I also hope that and that the Raider X wins the contract for the FARA program, it just seems like the better choice

  • @vigoedwinpandika1545
    @vigoedwinpandika1545 Місяць тому

    2:05 that looks like an upside down cross 💀

  • @mr.brasskutt5385
    @mr.brasskutt5385 9 місяців тому

    La pucha, que manera de gastar la tarasca en estos chirinbolitos, por favor...... y se agradece el video Maestro. 🚣👍

  • @Cornylius76
    @Cornylius76 9 місяців тому

    can someone explain the name of the competition is ftuas not feat-ous

  • @Goldenclad17
    @Goldenclad17 6 місяців тому

    Not to be annoying as heck, but LRS-B is not an aircraft class, it was a project. This project resulted in the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider, actually meant to replace the B-52 and B-1.

  • @martintodd9944
    @martintodd9944 9 місяців тому +2

    Can the MICV XM30 be fully remote controlled? Noone inside? It says crew of 2 but the gun is remote controlled? Just wondering if that makes it a stationary unmanned gun platform for defence that can become a manned mobile assault vehicle or just what it means by having a gunner for a remote controlled gun

    • @JWQweqOPDH
      @JWQweqOPDH 9 місяців тому

      Remote control turret usually just means controlled by someone sitting in the hull instead of someone sitting/standing in the turret. IIRC they called this vehicle Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle but changed the name because they realized it would be a while until autonomy was practical, although it is still a stretch goal.

    • @martintodd9944
      @martintodd9944 9 місяців тому

      @@JWQweqOPDH oh ok, thank you . I tried googling but couldn't make much sense and it seemed to say both remote controlled and manned and I thought remote controlled meant not in the vehicle and so couldn't work out how it could be both. Thanks for clearing it up

    • @tanostrelok2323
      @tanostrelok2323 9 місяців тому

      Russians projected to put the entire crew in an armored compartment inside the hull with the Armata, so I'd imagine they're going to run with the same concept, but better budget to pull it off so it doesn't break down in parades.

  • @bagzxx777
    @bagzxx777 8 місяців тому

    Am I not alone who read FTUAS uncorrectly first time?

  • @letaxes
    @letaxes 8 місяців тому +1

    abramsX is not the DLP

  • @petertyson4022
    @petertyson4022 8 місяців тому

    🙂👍

  • @ToanNguyen-rv8hm
    @ToanNguyen-rv8hm 6 місяців тому

    Uss ddgx?

  • @FooLoo_
    @FooLoo_ 8 місяців тому

    Good thing the didn’t name the it
    Future Unmanned Tactical Aircraft System

  • @d.b.q.p.1540
    @d.b.q.p.1540 9 місяців тому

    а про рельсотрон, стреляющий гайками на гиперскоростях, забыл(а)

  • @martintodd9944
    @martintodd9944 9 місяців тому +1

    Some of them say development cancelled, odd thing to say on a "look at the future tech were making" video

    • @mateuszbanaszak4671
      @mateuszbanaszak4671 9 місяців тому

      Few "Zumwalt's" were completed, and are still in use, but construction of new ones was canceled.
      So *MAYBE* they go back to it in the future, when they figure how this Sci-Fi Tech Boat actually works.

    • @martintodd9944
      @martintodd9944 9 місяців тому

      @@mateuszbanaszak4671 that's why I mentioned it to try to see why he'd included them

    • @martintodd9944
      @martintodd9944 9 місяців тому

      @@mateuszbanaszak4671 cos cancelled usually means not to be developed and so never to be used and so it's an odd thing to show in a video about what's going to be coming out soon. I get this confused you and you tried to hide it by humour but you failed

  • @samutommimarchetti
    @samutommimarchetti 9 місяців тому

    Hi

  • @zakywicaksana3641
    @zakywicaksana3641 7 місяців тому

    5:47 whats music

  • @reaperch.2476
    @reaperch.2476 9 місяців тому

    Is CGX-21 canceled?

    • @phucnguyen560
      @phucnguyen560 9 місяців тому

      yes. Due to the cost and the ability of a warship carry hundred of missile is impossible. DDG(x) will replace it

  • @user-cu5or7jt7g
    @user-cu5or7jt7g 7 днів тому

    Where is DDG(X)

  • @militarygeneration7
    @militarygeneration7 Місяць тому

    What's?
    military generation

  • @stephch6293
    @stephch6293 5 місяців тому

    We need same video but with Russian Army forces!

  • @hikyuu1
    @hikyuu1 9 місяців тому +1

    Chances are we will upgrade the systems we have, pour billions into R&D on a few prototypes and then cancel, (RAH-66 Comanche). The USS Zumwalt is a joke. It’s like a stealth building. It can be followed by a fishing trawler that can radio it position.

    • @JWQweqOPDH
      @JWQweqOPDH 9 місяців тому +3

      I think it's faster than most fishing trawlers. Also fishing trawlers mostly stick to littoral seas. The stealth features are mostly to increase the odds of cruise missiles missing rather than not being located. Combine stealth features with some quickly deployed smoke/chaff screens and decoys and you'll fool most missiles. That's why the latest cruise missiles are being designed to turn around and try again if they miss, although that gives CIWS a much better chance.

    • @hikyuu1
      @hikyuu1 9 місяців тому

      Is it faster than a fishing trawler? YES but for the cost it’s questionable at to whether it was worth it. It’s like the LCS program. It sounded great in theory but fell short and is overpriced. It might work if it’s high tech long distance fight but ifs it’s close stealth won’t matter add to it the cost of rounds for the main guns that are too expensive is it real worth it?

    • @Er19421
      @Er19421 8 місяців тому +3

      The Comanche was cancelled because the Cold War was over and the proliferation of MANPAADS to the terrorist forces being fought at the time meant that speed was more important than stealth, at least as long as hovering gunships are vulnerable to the mark one eyeball. The reason platforms get canceled is because of cost overruns or because they take too long to develop and the tactics they were designed for are no longer effective. Never listen to those idiots that say war never changes, or you’ll get taken out by a BVR AIM-9x while you’re coming in for your dogfight.

  • @f2204b
    @f2204b 8 місяців тому

    Zumwalt project has been cancelled couse of very high price they only 3 ships left i dont know this project want to replace a ticonderoga or arleigh class

  • @A-4_Skyhawk
    @A-4_Skyhawk 9 місяців тому +2

    waiting for the same video but this time with the Russians and Chinese.

    • @Insectoid_
      @Insectoid_ 9 місяців тому +3

      Russians 😂

    • @Insectoid_
      @Insectoid_ 9 місяців тому

      And all China do is try and steal everything.

    • @tanostrelok2323
      @tanostrelok2323 9 місяців тому

      The Chinese are not as open as the US when it comes to weapon developments, Russians on the other hand are always ready to tell everyone about the super duper weapons that will teabag whatever the Americans will field in 300 years, but with the current Ukraine business I don't think they're developing much new stuff.

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@@Insectoid_it's gonna be short

  • @randomjihaad6662
    @randomjihaad6662 8 місяців тому

    Vapourware....

  • @susah135
    @susah135 8 місяців тому

    Indonesian military vehicles please

  • @f2204b
    @f2204b 8 місяців тому

    The raptor got a retired early because of a very high price and tech and theres no such kind fighter jet that equal to f22 raptor why they wanna replace that thing with more double high prices and tech fighter jet ?

  • @stevenwynn7162
    @stevenwynn7162 6 місяців тому

    What needs to be focused on is electronic warfare, long range artillery, drones and air defense systems… And as Stalin once said “sometimes quantity is a quality all on its own”… Sometimes it’s just better to have a lot of lesser capable machines

  • @Pernalongacomunista658
    @Pernalongacomunista658 9 місяців тому +1

    First

  • @Leonardorodrih1309
    @Leonardorodrih1309 9 місяців тому

    Chinese army vehicles please

  • @phucnguyen560
    @phucnguyen560 9 місяців тому

    you missed DDG(x)

  • @user-tg9ri8lu4v
    @user-tg9ri8lu4v 9 місяців тому

    hb

  • @abidaqila7937
    @abidaqila7937 9 місяців тому +1

    Pls pin....

  • @evalle1978
    @evalle1978 9 місяців тому

    LOL THE F35 (FAT BIRD) LOL

  • @maxvonkrieger9432
    @maxvonkrieger9432 9 місяців тому

    US dreams 😂😂

    • @hornet8364
      @hornet8364 9 місяців тому +4

      not really dreams. the valor and the invictus are already approved, the NGAD prototype had its maiden flight, the drones are in testing, the USS JFK has been launched (so will probably enter service before 2027), the F-35 has already reached the 1000 aircraft procured milestone, etc

    • @maxvonkrieger9432
      @maxvonkrieger9432 9 місяців тому

      @@hornet8364 but Russia and China is little bit forward 😂

    • @analien5251
      @analien5251 9 місяців тому +4

      @@maxvonkrieger9432 no they are not, china is still trying to get their army to modern standards and do not have enough aircraft to fight the US and Russia is focusing all their money on not getting destroyed by ukraine, the US has already tested and flown their aircraft.

    • @maxvonkrieger9432
      @maxvonkrieger9432 9 місяців тому +1

      @@analien5251 yeah yeah😂😂😂

    • @CrabSpirits
      @CrabSpirits 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@@maxvonkrieger9432are you going to tell us about Russian superior technology? Waiting for your wisdom.

  • @atanasvasilev3228
    @atanasvasilev3228 3 місяці тому

    The ships are fine, but all other new gen US war tech is - ABSOLUTELY HIDEOUS! Just look at it. Disproportioned, not looking even remotely menacing. Very bad designs.

  • @supabass4003
    @supabass4003 9 місяців тому

    the germans really had AFV design worked out in WW2, these look like futuristic wehrmacht weapons.

  • @razdva154
    @razdva154 8 місяців тому

    О, вот они те самые аналоговнеты. Где-же наш Abrams X? Ах да, от него пока что только есть макет. Я уже молчу про то, что у США кончились деньги и оружие на поддержку Украины, а Израиль вон душат по полной программе)

    • @freedomefighterbrony9053
      @freedomefighterbrony9053 6 місяців тому

      No it’s called there’s not enough support in congress to continue support also the abramsX is just a demo vehicle the army already decided it’s not needed because there ain’t a big enough threat to warrant the need of a tank that advanced

  • @abyss313
    @abyss313 8 місяців тому

    Meh
    Russian vehicles still better.

    • @thathusk9119
      @thathusk9119 8 місяців тому +2

      why so?

    • @abyss313
      @abyss313 8 місяців тому

      @@thathusk9119 equality and powerful of Russian weapons is way better than American

    • @thathusk9119
      @thathusk9119 8 місяців тому +2

      @@abyss313 give me 3 examples

    • @abyss313
      @abyss313 8 місяців тому

      @@thathusk9119
      Not need to give examples it's already clear

    • @thathusk9119
      @thathusk9119 8 місяців тому +2

      @@abyss313 Give me an example. It's not clear to me.

  • @Goblin669
    @Goblin669 9 місяців тому +5

    We need more powerful weapons for Ukraine.

  • @BETAJIbb
    @BETAJIbb 6 місяців тому

    and nothing abou Russian and Chinese )) chanal only about us tehnic

  • @BuddyThePyro
    @BuddyThePyro 9 місяців тому +1

    This video should be titled "Most Deadly Next Generation Weapons of the Israeli owned US military" since the only wars the US military fights is for the sake of israel.