S2.2.15 Explain hybridization as mixing of orbitals making new orbitals [HL IB Chemistry]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 175

  • @savamormrsrandom
    @savamormrsrandom 10 років тому +85

    OH MYGOSH. I'M CRYING. TEARS OF JOY BECAUSE I UNDERSTOOD. YOU'RE AMAZING

  • @ibchemvids
    @ibchemvids  12 років тому +58

    That makes up for the kid I made cry teaching this!

    • @AceStudy-kf6mj
      @AceStudy-kf6mj Рік тому

      Wonder if he/she knows about hybridization by now

  • @shahjadaislam2725
    @shahjadaislam2725 11 років тому +4

    Most concise and best hybridization video I've come across yet.

  • @108mtsan
    @108mtsan 8 років тому +20

    This was the only hybridization video on UA-cam that I could understand. Good job. These step by step assigning is really understandable.

  • @kristenpalumbo4120
    @kristenpalumbo4120 7 років тому +2

    Richard, you saved my life in high school and I am still going back to your videos years later in university. Thanks so much!

  • @sidra7011
    @sidra7011 7 років тому +5

    THANK YOU SO MUCH! After watching around 10/20 different videos, I finally come across one where I ACTUALLY understand hybridisation! Thank you 😊

  • @fernmacarthur
    @fernmacarthur 6 років тому +2

    I took SL IB Chemistry and now I'm at University learning HL concepts. Still learning from you.

  • @Gillian15HS
    @Gillian15HS 12 років тому +2

    This is brilliant! I finally completely understand hybridization. Many, many thanks for all your videos, keep it up.

  • @utube460
    @utube460 10 років тому +6

    hv seen so many on hybridisation - this gives the best explanation and understanding - Thanks a Ton !

  • @herman9737
    @herman9737 9 років тому +4

    Thank you, i owe my diploma to you now, 1 day before the final exam, still didnt get sigma pie bonds with hybridization, but now I do thanks

  • @ibchemvids
    @ibchemvids  11 років тому +1

    Hmm - that is a good point well made - I think you are (gulp) correct. Your comments are consistently excellent. Assuming px is on the internuclear axis (which seems reasonable) then I should have taken it into the hybrid orbital everytime. I thought I had made the definitive video on this -agggggghhhh!

  • @hoka9545
    @hoka9545 11 років тому +7

    thanks mate. i have been studying around 5 hours but didnt understand anything. this 5 min is phenomenal. thanks

  • @jwangtr
    @jwangtr 10 років тому

    You know.....Life became easier after this video.....Could breathe again.Thank You.

  • @samuellowe9949
    @samuellowe9949 3 роки тому +1

    You hero I have my chem end of year paper tomorrow and you’ve saved me

  • @Lexie194
    @Lexie194 12 років тому +3

    Thank you so so much! I have a test on this (and organic chemistry) on Friday, you're a lifesaver!

  • @miamihussain1665
    @miamihussain1665 8 років тому +44

    I laughed waaay to hard at the "Delta G must be negative"

    • @sanyamishra2825
      @sanyamishra2825 4 роки тому

      I didn’t get itttt HELP

    • @sheaj1872
      @sheaj1872 4 роки тому

      @@sanyamishra2825 same ._.

    • @gordonlai9248
      @gordonlai9248 3 роки тому +2

      @@sheaj1872 change in gibbs free energy (delta G) is negative for spontaneous reactions

  • @ng.6211
    @ng.6211 7 років тому

    2 years well spent! Great Job mate, thx!

  • @horatiosicilia3427
    @horatiosicilia3427 11 років тому

    Hey no problems - its really great that you reply to our questions etc... I thought it was just an oversight i think we all knew what you meant ! I just wanted to be sure i wasnt missing anything.
    Thanks

  • @strwberimlk
    @strwberimlk 8 років тому

    I was literally crying before I saw this video. Thank you for explaining it very clearly!

  • @ibchemvids
    @ibchemvids  11 років тому +5

    If I recall the IB did ask this once in detail many moons ago.

  • @Mrjarnould
    @Mrjarnould 12 років тому

    I have been waiting for a video on this syllabus point for 13 months! THANK YOU SO MUCH!

  • @alexisross5657
    @alexisross5657 7 років тому

    I'm at university and your videos are still helping me so many years later

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  7 років тому +2

      you must have been on of the first subscribers then!

  • @zeeny2562
    @zeeny2562 6 років тому +1

    Thank you so much. My lecturer showed it to us, rewatching it again :)

  • @jdg17
    @jdg17 4 роки тому +1

    best explanation of hybridization on youtube

  • @JustAnEnglishComment
    @JustAnEnglishComment 8 років тому +1

    I was taught that for the sp2 orbital it is the 2pz orbital which remains unhybridized, rather than the 2px (3:02 in the video)... I'm a bit confused as to whom I should trust >.

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  8 років тому +1

      you are correct - the error does not change the IB chemistry answer - but it is a mistake.

  • @spencerlindquist9668
    @spencerlindquist9668 8 років тому

    First hybridization video that actually helps. thank you.

  • @marafortune3713
    @marafortune3713 5 років тому

    Why do I only discover your channel one day before my Chem HL exams... It could have saved me so much stress! Thank you anyway!

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  5 років тому +2

      Get a good nights rest too - and don't neglect the option.

  • @manicpixiedreamgirl7930
    @manicpixiedreamgirl7930 8 років тому

    Great video. I made it all the way to the end without crying. :P

  • @calseygraham9456
    @calseygraham9456 8 років тому

    this was absolutely phenomenal. My mind is blown

  • @iVVARHERO
    @iVVARHERO 11 років тому +1

    So the reason as to why atomic orbitals hybridize is to achieve the same energy? Because the s is lower in energy than the p, and if the atomic orbitals didn't hybridize, the first "bonding" electron from a nearby atom would be placed first in the s orbital making it a more "unstable" or "s level favorable bond?" In doing so, does this also limit the number of atoms that can bond with the molecule? If so, why? And now that everything is hybridized, there is even bonding among all orbitals?

  • @michaelvandemolegraaf8124
    @michaelvandemolegraaf8124 10 років тому

    Just great Richard! I understood this topic but something wasn't clicking. Now it has. Thanks =)

  • @saritapilane4280
    @saritapilane4280 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for simplest explanation..🙏😊

  • @taylorbarton8576
    @taylorbarton8576 7 років тому

    YES. That actually makes sense, especially about why each orbital is called what

  • @yeny7194
    @yeny7194 4 роки тому

    it was definitely worth it. I'm still a little confused by it but this helped a lot!!!
    thank you

  • @Laurmins
    @Laurmins 8 років тому

    This really simplified things I understand this much better now!!! Thank you 😭

  • @silversteel9161
    @silversteel9161 7 років тому

    Wow never understand it from my teacher, best explanation ever thanks !!

  • @thecustomadventures7719
    @thecustomadventures7719 2 роки тому

    Great video
    How about lone pairs? Do they change the number of paired electricians in the hybrid orbitals?

  • @tiyababy5207
    @tiyababy5207 3 роки тому

    Thanks.. This is fine to realize box form of hybridization

  • @lillissie
    @lillissie 12 років тому

    hey rick! what a coincidence you uploaded this today! they asked this in the november hl chem exam yesterday that i just finished. hehe...

  • @rintunesrintunes
    @rintunesrintunes 12 років тому

    why are you so awesome? GREAT GREAT VIDEOS i really appreciate you doing this! and i know all chemistry IB students all around the world do too!

  • @shazz7421
    @shazz7421 11 років тому +1

    God bless you, Sir for this video. Thank you.

  • @456dave7
    @456dave7 7 років тому +1

    Why do we take pz orbital to hybridize with the s instead of the other two?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  7 років тому +2

      in reality it does not matter which orbital you choose.

    • @456dave7
      @456dave7 7 років тому +1

      I see, so it's energy that determines the location of the electrons, i.e. if there are free slots in the hybridized orbital, then there will only be one electron each in the unhybridized p orbitals, and the other electrons will be in the hybridized orbital to minimize energy.

  • @dabest1637
    @dabest1637 Рік тому

    how do you tell when to use which hybridizing technique

  • @4ueyescream
    @4ueyescream 11 років тому

    Rich,it seems as though the Px orbital is always a pi bond (i.e the orbital that is left behind and not included in the sp and sp2 hybridisation) - but i thought that Px implies sigma bonds? Clarify? Thanks.

  • @victorayodele5063
    @victorayodele5063 8 років тому

    Thanks a lot...u truly are a good lecturer

  • @kennethwilson5017
    @kennethwilson5017 10 років тому

    Was absolutely worth it, Thanks

  • @criscanrocku
    @criscanrocku 11 років тому

    First of all, thank you very much for your videos! They are very helpful and you are an extraordinary teacher!
    Secondly, I have a question... Do we need to know how to draw those examples with the orbitals hybridising?
    Thanks a lot.

  • @davememe8598
    @davememe8598 7 років тому

    amazing amazing amazing
    clear all the concept

  • @ibchemvids
    @ibchemvids  12 років тому

    Orbitals do not need to hybridize every time to make a sigma bond eg H2
    If, after hybridisation, there is still a p-orbital left with an electron in it, then there will be a pi bond.
    Probably.

  • @sheislove07
    @sheislove07 11 років тому +1

    Perfect! Thanks for this. :)

  • @suraphelendalu4070
    @suraphelendalu4070 2 роки тому

    It was so helpful. Thank you. 👍

  • @fareehasid8182
    @fareehasid8182 12 років тому

    When the orbitals hybridise, are they only then able to form sigma bonds? Can they not form pi bonds? Thanks so much for your videos by the way - they're really helpful!

  • @Kirby12Blossom
    @Kirby12Blossom 10 років тому

    Hello there Mr. Thornley: When you talk about sp2 hybridization, there's one less electron on the left. so its not a carbon atom anymore, right? The configuration should be 2.3?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  10 років тому

      it is still a carbon atom, with 1s2 sp2 (which contains 3 electrons) 2p1

  • @damlaortac8688
    @damlaortac8688 5 років тому

    This literally saved me!! Thank you so much!!!!!

  • @DarkNinjaStudent
    @DarkNinjaStudent 10 років тому

    Hi Mr. Thornley, I never understood this. For the sp2 hybridization, why couldn't the double bond between C and O in H2CO just be 2 sigma bonds using an sp3 hybridized bond? Why must it be 1 sigma sp2 hybridized bond and 1 pi 2Px bond? Thanks :)

    • @DarkNinjaStudent
      @DarkNinjaStudent 10 років тому

      Also, if it is related to the charge centers, how? It seems that in the next video it's only stated, not explained :S Sorry if it's beyond the IB Syllabus

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  10 років тому

      Michael Jonathan
      single sigma = 1 charge center
      sigma and pi double bond = 2 charge centers
      sigma and 2 x pi triple bond = 3 charge centers
      lone pair = 1 charge center

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  10 років тому

      I think that a double bond cannot be 2xsigma because the sigma is along the internuclear axis and there is no room for 2 bonds there only room for one.
      The pi bond is half above/half below this axis so there is room for it.
      probably...

  • @laetitiaguindon8188
    @laetitiaguindon8188 11 років тому

    That Gibbs free energy joke is genius

  • @CuddleCultishere
    @CuddleCultishere 7 років тому

    Sir, you saved my life

  • @uddinabbas766
    @uddinabbas766 11 років тому

    This video help me for understanding of hybridization more easily.

  • @jessfern95
    @jessfern95 8 років тому

    Why are the videos in the playlist in the wrong order? The explanation for sigma and pi bonds come after this video.

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  8 років тому

      +JfernandesTV Thanks - I moved it.

  • @adrianbolden906
    @adrianbolden906 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this video!

  • @thebadagnostic
    @thebadagnostic 6 років тому

    But why hybridization occurs ? why S +P = Sp^3 etc combine ? . so that carbon can get 8 electron at the outer shell ? . if so why "S" got more then 8 Electron ?

  • @zarnakhandekar2182
    @zarnakhandekar2182 3 роки тому

    Could you please tell which application are you using to make these videos.... loved your work

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  3 роки тому

      The board work is activboard, the animation is 3dsmax - i have used it for 20 years and i have barely scratched the surface. It is free if you are a teacher or student.

  • @NotComrade69
    @NotComrade69 10 років тому +2

    very good try to do for 3 days got in 3 mins thnx tell me which software did u use

  • @ibchemvids
    @ibchemvids  12 років тому +2

    tough luck buddy! Did the exam go OK?

  • @360tamiltips
    @360tamiltips 6 років тому

    thank you sir i understood and god bless u for ur service

  • @MrRuslan779
    @MrRuslan779 9 років тому

    I enjoyed your video, but got confused about one aspect. For methane, your referred to the sp3 orbitals as "it," i.e. you've implied that one sp3 orbital is formed from 1s and 3 p orbitals. However, I am pretty sure that this is not the case, as 4 sp3 orbitals have been formed. Otherwise, wouldn't the molecular orbital theory be violated?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  9 років тому

      +Ruslan Mushkaev yup 4 orbitals are formed.

  • @Alvin8852
    @Alvin8852 10 років тому

    Helo, Mr. Thornley, how do we show the atomic orbitals leading to hybrid orbitals for SO3 and PO4 3- ??
    Can you explain in detail, please ? Thank You...

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  10 років тому

      wow - if I was that smart ... no idea sorry. That is IB+3 chemistry - whereas I am only humble IB.

  • @FireRadical-rx8ib
    @FireRadical-rx8ib 7 років тому

    hey rick i would like to know what software you are using in this video

  • @TeenGohan9798
    @TeenGohan9798 7 років тому

    was definitely worth , thank u very much :)

  • @fairymaheta
    @fairymaheta 9 років тому

    God you made it look so easy!!
    Thank you soooo much!! :D

  • @cherry.bakewell8973
    @cherry.bakewell8973 8 років тому

    But why and how does hybridization happen? Does it happen as the atom bonds to another and the other atom therefore causes the sublevels to hybridize and change positions...? Is this what causes the energy to be released in formation, as the orbitals drop down a portion of an energy level?
    Why does learning chemistry just create more questions...? :(

    • @paean800
      @paean800 8 років тому

      +Cherry.Bakewell
      I had the exact same question...This is the answer I found:
      "Hybridization was introduced to explain molecular structure when the valence bond theory failed to correctly predict them."
      "According to Valence Bond Theory, carbon should form two covalent bonds, resulting in a CH2, because it has two unpaired electrons in its electronic configuration. However, experiments have shown that CH2 is highly reactive and cannot exist outside of a reaction. Therefore, this does not explain how CH4 can exist. To form four bonds the configuration of carbon must have four unpaired electrons."
      Taken from: chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Organic_Chemistry/Fundamentals/Hybrid_Orbitals

    • @cherry.bakewell8973
      @cherry.bakewell8973 8 років тому

      David Peana Ahhh, that makes a lot more sense. Thank you!

  • @BhoomikaChauhan97
    @BhoomikaChauhan97 11 років тому

    Wow! Thanks for putting this up! Really helped a lot

  • @jumarashidfiros1886
    @jumarashidfiros1886 11 років тому

    U r awsm .... i understood it in a jiffy..nice work.:')

  • @aminzairi51
    @aminzairi51 8 років тому

    thank you for the video it's really helpful and cool u helped me to imagine the structure

  • @lillissie
    @lillissie 12 років тому

    yea it was actually a pretty good exam, compared to may :) good work ib!

  • @yammay
    @yammay 7 років тому

    What does the 2:4 mean? I know you said that "it has an electron configuration of 2:4," but I don't see how that fits in with anything you did in this video.

    • @CapeTownGamer
      @CapeTownGamer 7 років тому +1

      First shell of electrons has 2, second shell has 4

  • @hydrogen1562
    @hydrogen1562 8 років тому

    In my chemistry textbook it says an s orbital + pz orbital is nonbonding, but in the HCN example there is a bond, why is that?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  8 років тому +1

      yup - this video is good enough for IB but does contain that error.

  • @ohmoxide
    @ohmoxide 8 років тому

    This excellent. What program did you use to for the graphics?

  • @fawwazali4208
    @fawwazali4208 8 років тому +1

    BEST OUT OF BEST!!!!
    Got full clarity..............................

  • @TrueShall
    @TrueShall 10 років тому

    It was worth it, thanks a lot

  • @soumyasharma5743
    @soumyasharma5743 8 років тому +1

    Outstanding!!! Mr. THornley!! WOW!

  • @kavyah3316
    @kavyah3316 5 років тому +1

    Thank you so much sir

  • @eikocreates
    @eikocreates 3 роки тому

    "are you crying yet" - instant sub

  • @brandyObiscuits
    @brandyObiscuits 11 років тому

    x y and z axes are interchangeable. so i believe it really does not matter.

  • @lungelomnisi7030
    @lungelomnisi7030 3 роки тому

    im so confused.. how do you know if something is going to be a sigma or pi bond? what are the rules?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  3 роки тому

      all covalent bonds have one sigma bond - the rest are pi!

  • @aseelalfageer8827
    @aseelalfageer8827 6 років тому

    You are incredible THANK YOU😘❤️

  • @paulokano5032
    @paulokano5032 12 років тому

    Helping survive another semester in IB

  • @ComputerGeekoo
    @ComputerGeekoo 12 років тому

    it was well worth it! thanks a lot!

  • @danielsyed-chaudhry256
    @danielsyed-chaudhry256 6 років тому

    THANKS SO MUCH RICHARD

  • @Jojolm5
    @Jojolm5 6 років тому

    Helped so much thank you!!!

  • @имми-г6ц
    @имми-г6ц 5 років тому

    you are THE BEST!

  • @umarlatiff9595
    @umarlatiff9595 7 років тому

    What software do you use?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  7 років тому

      an old version of activstudio with an active board. I have found nothing better that this to use.

  • @DMAE464
    @DMAE464 9 років тому

    Yes it was worth it!
    Thanks much!:)

  • @suherelias9617
    @suherelias9617 6 років тому

    the best video ever

  • @Thegamer-yp7qq
    @Thegamer-yp7qq 8 років тому

    why 2p ...why not just p?

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  8 років тому +3

      There is no p-orbital, but the simplest p-orbital is 2p.

  • @aishuchetri5435
    @aishuchetri5435 7 років тому

    u r AMAZING! THANKSS 😄😄😄

  • @chubiibunni
    @chubiibunni 8 років тому

    thank you sooo much for your videos. pleaseeee replace my uni lecturer!!!!!

  • @maxtory8063
    @maxtory8063 6 років тому

    I love you so much.

  • @hoka9545
    @hoka9545 11 років тому +84

    Most concise and best hybridization video I've come across yet.

    • @ibchemvids
      @ibchemvids  11 років тому +18

      it took me weeks to make this one!

    • @hoka9545
      @hoka9545 11 років тому +2

      thank you very much.

    • @doksa29
      @doksa29 11 років тому +1

      Richard Thornley I love you

    • @silversteel9161
      @silversteel9161 7 років тому

      Richard Thornley wow amazing work !

  • @debasmitamitra
    @debasmitamitra 5 років тому

    Nice its amazing