STOCK 6.2L SILVERADO AIN'T NO JOKE!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- Get your Triple-X apparel, koozies, decals, graphics, DVD's & more at www.triplexmoto...
There hasn't been some good ole truck match ups on the channel lately, so put together a couple of fun pulls with a Ford Powerstroke 6.7L with tune and delete, and another '06 gen Silverado with 5.3L, cam, stall, headers and supposedly no nitrous, but never heard a pure NA setup "lean pop", so we'll call it a small shot.
Camera truck is 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 6.2L crew cab 4x4 with 6" Pro Comp lift and 35" NItto Trail Graps. Stock performance wise.
Check out Triple-X Motorsports & Outdoors on Facebook for updates on events, action photos, videos, giveaways and lots of other cool innerwebs humor!
/ triplex.motorsports
Please Ignore or flag spam, negative, or hateful comments. We're here to have a good time. Thanks everyone, and enjoy!
Man... Love your TRUCK ,Rolling like this on a lift & 35s GOD bless CHEVY,Thanks for the video bro.
6.2 All the way.
GOD bless AMERICA.
Chevy isn't even American lol oops
@@stockish_coyote5647oh my god are u serious please oh lord tell me ur kiddding cuz if not ur calling an american made motor company not American 😂
God bless!
I like how it says stock but the guy in the older chevy asks if he had nitrous and he responded "yea that too"
The smaller truck has the cam and nitrous. The bigger truck has lift amd tires. Its ine the first few secinds of the video
james pollard Gas engine truck vs Diesel engine truck. The ford already has an advantage lmfao.
@@blakeboyle3069 what Ford? This is Chevy 2WD 5.3 vs Chevy 4WD 6.2
@@demonchild8452
After both the chevys race...the 6.2L chevy truck races a Ford diesel truck...
"2.5 honks again" hahaha
I love it when people take a gen 5 truck and try to pick on a gen3. Thats like comparing a c8 to the c5.... so with your direct injection, tune, higher compression, probably e85 Id say the old 295 base hp gen 3 truck held his nuts high. I have both and they are great but its the best kicking peoples asses in my 20 year old 1 owner gen 3.
a stock truck that is newer vs an older truck with headers and a cam is picking on them?
@davidhowell3609 the retrd doesn't know it's a 4door let alone know his truck is not stock.
Shifted really early. he was probably in 4low. With stock 3.5s and 35 inch tires it makes for good 8 Mile racing
Too many people confusing the 6.2, LS based (L89) truck engine (2009-2013) and the LT based 6.2 (2014-current). I've had both and loved them both. on my 2010, at 130,000 miles, i did a cam, heads, headers and CAI and was only a couple hundredths faster than my current, bone stock RST 6.2. The 2020 runs just a tick under 14, bone stock with 22" wheels and 3.42 gear.
That's one fast 6.2
Bone stock direct injection 6.2L doesn't play!
+rekjavicxxx Yea not all stock cars are slow haha
+rekjavicxxx both are sequential fuel injected bro
no the 6.2 is 2014 its direct injected
Jerame Phillips no direct injection was not introduced until 2015
That new engine is super efficient with the direct injection. With the diesel what happened on the second race seemed to be a big difference?
The second race was in 2wd. The diesels are quick out of the hole only if you can launch them in boost. If you can't boost launch them it is a huge difference.
The 5.3 Silverado had some major traction issues. I think if he would have hooked it wouldnt have even been a race. But I agree the new 6.2 is a bad ass.
Bamabrute85 Hookin outta the hole is part of racing. Ya gotta be able to hook your shit....LOL
rekjavicxxx easy to say when you have 4x4 on.. lol. Takes 0 skill
So the lowered truck has cam headers and nitrous Plus stall but still got left by a lifted Chevy on 35s🧐 that lean pop was probably a nitrous backfire from not being purged haha got it on that second run though
Shawn Holman b
So between the LM7 and L92 I picked up for my 69 RS Camaro...is the L92 a no brainer? The camaro is chassiworks back halved with ,canted 4 link, wilwood discs all around, built for 9”, roll cage and full front end suspension bolt ins it’s built to be a bad street car...original plan was single big turbo on the 5.3 but now I’m not sure...
just saw what u meant lmao ok 2014 ya I know 6.2 vortec came out that is a fast truck. I was talking about the 2004 05 looking one the description just said 5.3 modded engine. yup not a bad 6.2 silverado. I wonder what a 6.4 hemi would do if it was in a 1500 body to bad its in a 2500 and not 1500 like ford and chevy would with their high output engines
damn that ext is loud...my truck is cammed with headers and has a totally different exhaust note
When they say “ no cemma cuhh”
thats one fast beast i agree i also own a yukon denali with the 6.2 stock it pulls quick for an suv
RCSPIKES TAHOE HD Yup! You know wuzup
that shit is a swap not the original motor on it
Sergio Zamora no it's not alot of newer ones came with a 6.2 in nnbs style mainly vortec max..... then 2014 I believe alot of crew cabs came with a 6.2.....if it was a NBS like the 1st run then ya it's a swap no doubt
As a 5.3l owner I can say that the 5.3 is very gutless, however it is an amazing motor.
5.3s got sum balls wym
I’ve owned a few 5.3’s not too bad but I am now in a 2020 RST with a 6.2L 10 speed auto and it’s dam impressive
@@sknow1713 he’s tripping lol
@@zxJC34xz 6.0 is beast 5.3 is just alright
@@darrin2053 the 10 spd on the newer Chevy trucks are priceless man the way they respond , test drove my friends 2022 trail boss which also is a 6.2 and thing moves for being a truck , and it’s a long bed too
not bad. I think 4wd is better to race with to begin with.
+Super Mario These new chevy's have "torque management" that limits wheelspin. It works very well actually. Turn traction control off on dry pavement and floor it in 2wd with little to no brake boosting, you will get some wheelspin but the truck will sort it out. This seems to be the fastest way to get a stock tuned 6.2L truck down the 1/4.
+Gilbert McGillicutty I can imagine bro, my 6.2L does spin out sometimes but I have worn out my tires from off roading. the best thing would be to have traction control on or just race off the pavement floor.
Guess it depends on what you think is fast.
yes I know I just cleared up that I got mixed up with the older body style silveradovs the newer one
Silverado was a CCSB, on Chrome 22's, yes you have 35's but still 22's are big to be turning :/
Ok so the 5.3 is the one in the second race correct?? That one by a fender and 6.2 was the one holding camera??!! Seems like 5.3 was faster and 6.2 was just keeping up I take it beside racing the slow ford
Exhaust and tune is not stock but its close
What exhaust is on that 6.2?
Love the truck racing!
The 6.2l puttin in WORK!
5.3 from that year is 295hp compare to 420hp from the 6.2 makes sense
That 5.3 wasn't stock though.
I've got the 6.2 in my jimmy 2010 model. I spun the casing strait off the rim racing a charger I had recently beat... I didn't realize it but bystander later told me that tire looked low. But still, at 45. Now I've drove and built my share... but I haven't ever spun a tire off it's bead I'm still waiting to get emailed the video (it was to large a file to send by phone) so I can post it. But I saw it and my tire wasn't flat. Maybe it was low.. but never the less I don't think any cammero I've owned or my built Nova 383 could touch my 2500HD 4x4
Man I love the newest gen 6.2. I almost got one but decided on a 15 EcoBoost instead
Yeah, Ecoboost is badass fo sho
+rekjavicxxx yes sir I just got a custom 93 octane tune and it flies now. Any performance mods coming for the 6.2?
A ecoboost over a 6.2? You must be high as fuck
+Stevenson Nutgobbler the 6.2 I was looking at was more expensive than the EcoBoost. And with just a 93 tune the Eco is pushing 475 horsepower and 525 torque
+Ross Fisher There are plenty of "performance mods" for a 6.2L. Edelbrock will warranty your truck if you install a E-force charger when you buy the truck. Pricey but you get over 530hp with low boost. A cam and bolt ons can get you over 100hp. E85 tunes etc. What are your peak boost pressures now? I thought 14psi stock was pretty high..
That extended cab sounded nasty lol
the 6.2 is the truck that the camera is in not the 04 body style
Love the sound of a chevy .
Didn’t you use to have a pretty quick Titan
TOTALLY STOCK**
**exhaust and tune
DaBrute the exhaust was on the 5.3
It's a 2014 Silverado 6.2L its i rated 420HP and 460 torque. Even if you have Heads and Cam 5.3 Silverado 03-07 it is still not enough to beat a 2014 Silverado.
quickzilver3333 a 5.3 with heads, cam, and the supporting mods, will certainly put down more than 420 hp. Add to the fact that the 6.2 cannot be had in a less than fully loaded truck, and the chances for the 5.3 get even better. I love the 6.2, but a correctly sorted out 5.3 is no joke either.
quickzilver3333 dumb fuck you need to learn the difference between wheel hp and crank hp .
@@ShyaMiss heads cam 5.3 wishes it could make 420hp best your gonna get is 380hp and that’s a fact
@@dobetter4271 all I can say is bullshit, so... bullshit. They will EASILY eclipse the 420 mark. Depending on which 5.3, breaking 500 is possible N/A your supposed 380? Well, Do better...
@@ShyaMiss I know my shit build and dyno cars all day long and know the LS in and out the only way your making 500 is if you change Engine size or boost it that’s it.. look up heads cam 5.3 dyno hundreds of vids out there and they all make around the same power don’t be stupid it’s not a LS3 it’s a shitty 5.3
Hey what exactly cross member did y'all use for the 6.2?
Chris I'm working in the area if you want to dig about it against my stock 14' Dmax on a tire too...
Retarded UA-cam not sure why I have 2 accounts and one isnt linked to anything...
Cold C6 Who is this?
rekjavicxxx
Cody G
Those never lie. They move. My 8.1 in my 2500HD shits and gets also, but i want more power. Good video man.
dkhill27 Oh yeah, 8.1L is no joke
I know for a fact that 1000ibs boat anchor does not get it. Hahaha
more vids of the truck?
That POP/CRACK at the 12-13 second mark coming from the other pickup can't be good. Seems like a fuel issue and if he keeps that up he won't have a truck to street race with.
He may need to have a tune done to correct his fueling before damage is caused.
That fucker sounds so damn good what a beast
i live in marshall with a 6.2 and i’d love to race it!
i love driving a diesel but videos like these always show unless it is in 4wd a straight up run is going to have us losing unless we have slicks on the rear
Shit LEAN POPPED or somthinnnnnnn.
reason its no joke, is that 6.2 is same engine they put in the corvette so it has power and has a lot of room for mod's. Put a like super charger, intake and exhaust, could get 500+hp pretty cheap and still be reliable.
arbiter1 Exactly! Time for mods!! Haha
Similar engine but there are aome differences. The C7 has a different intake manifold, different cam, different pistons, and different valves. The L86 in this truck is meant to favor bottom/mid power compared to the LT1 with a higher top end.
***** No dude the LS3 6.2, not LT1 6.2
smitty261974 I'm confused?
If the silverado is not a 2014 6.2 then it's the ls3 6.2
What exhaust is on the ext can
Wow what an beast! my friend has 6.0 Ford F250 with Chip/exhaust and that is fast for a truck can't imagine how fast this one is !
I have a camera in my truck with no nitrous and I lean pop all the time. besides if he was running a shot he would have blew you away
A stock 6.2 isnt beating a cam/nitrous 5.3 lol.. quit insulting everyone's intelligence.
Especially on 35's. Rear end gearing would definitely be needed from a dig to beat the other trucks.
And with a 6 inch lift
WHEN I SAW IT THE FIRST TIME I THOUGHT IT WAS A STUPID 6.2L SWAP INTO AN 03-06 NBS!!!😡😔😪
It's a LS3 with a smaller cam lol.
the 6.2 is a beast.
Sanic The new gen 6.2L is not an LS based engine any longer They are an EcoTec3 L86 engine, based around direct injection technology, similar to the 6.2L engine in the new Stingray.
rekjavicxxx they have the same bore stroke.
Same 6 bolt mains
Same cam position.
It's still a ls3 lol.
It is built of the new LT1 with a few minor changes, runs 400rpm less at redline and produces 420/460 as opposed to 460/460. It also produces it's torque lower in the curve for truck purposes. I just traded in my '10 5.3L, in love so far and increased fuel mileage over my old 325 LC9. Same block I would assume as the LS? GM says only a handful of parts transferred over from the outgoing LS to the incoming LT's, whether that holds water or not I am not sure, perhaps a GM engineer can chime in here.
C Genious I'd love to get one for a swap.
+SANIC There's a lot different with the ecotec 3's.
You're going to 80 mph though.. and that's one slow 06 cam stall bolt on truck then..
lean popped a stick truck, ok bud.
What gear ratio?
Prolly 3.11
Good for you for buying the 6.2L. Too damned many out there buying the 5.3L and wanting to modify it when the 6.2L is available already. It does require a high level trim package, but it makes big power stock. Too many trying to call it a Corvette motor though. It isn't any more a Corvette engine than the 350 in a truck was a Corvette engine because the Corvette had 350's. The 6.2L has been available in the trucks for quite some time and is it's own truck specific engine. The parts may interchange, but they are not the same parts as used in the Corvette. It is however the baddest engine GM has ever put into a truck by far especially in the torque department. The 8.1L in it's best years was 455 ftlbs of torque, 5 less than this 6.2L. With some mild mods these are poking into the 12's N/A. A set of 4.10's would really be of help I would imagine due to the tire size, but congrats on an awesome truck none the less.
Michael King I hear ya. The 2014+ 5.3's are impressive just as much by just putting e85 in the tank and nothing else. 380hp and 416ftlbs (crank numbers from the dyno run) is what lingenfelter achieved and that was with 65% ethanol in the fuel as indicated by the alcohol readings the truck gave. In a regular cab with e85 these truck move. I could be wrong but the 2014 6.2 isn't flexfuel compatible.
EGGINFOOLS Nope no cornjuice for the big guy. The can run blended 87 (up to 15% ethanol).
how did the 5.3 lose plz explain
thank you
You didn't hear it pop the first run? He said he let off
2wd is a wonderful thing sometimes hahaa XD
cool truck but thats a swap engine 6.2 vortec into the Silverado i havent heard of a 6.2 exsisting on that version of a truck unless it was the newer body from 2007. plus if you know hemi 6.1 would be shit fast as the 6.2 vortec. some guy had a video on here on youtube that did the swap dam that shit was so dam fast but i think he delete his vid or something idk but the 6.1 hemi make 430hp lol but cool vid of that silverado 6.2 a pretty dam strong ass engine lol
they've had the 6.2 in escalades for a long time and have em in Silverados and Sierras all the way to the new trucks. has nothing to do with hemi or any of that.
dude lifted truck was 2014 6.2 Silverado
lowered truck
5.3 Silverado
idk how u got that confused
The first Yukon Denali and Escalades had the 5.7-350 Vortec. Then from 2001-2006 the Denali/Escalade had the 6.0 Vortec. After 2007 is when they put the 6.2 in the Denali/Escalade.
They were all the same exact trucks, minus the fact the Escalade had a little more horsepower.
There's no way a "stock 6.2" is even hanging with a cam/longtube/stall/nitrous 5.3 let alone beating it, that 5.3 wasn't spraying then. Also the "lean pop" could easily happen on an NA car with a bad tune, I see it a lot actually. Back to the 5.3/6.2 comparo, a 5.3 with just headers and tune will put up better ETs than a stock 6.2, so add a stall and supposedly some spray and that 5.3 would walk all over a "stock" 6.2 lol. Hell a 5.3 bolt on Silverado will hang with a bolt on TBSS all day long, the 5.3 is a good platform. My work truck is a 5.3 SCSB and it went 12.90s with just intake/longtubes/cam/tune. Show me a stock or even a bolt on 6.2 truck running high 12's lol.
Joe Doole 6.2 Is just a larger 5.3, it's still a ls. I get what you're saying that the displacement difference isnt that huge but 6.2's we're heavily detuned from the factory in trucks, they produce almost 500hp in the performance varient.
The performance variant isn't a stock 6.2 lol. It's running different heads, a different cam, a different intake and a more aggressive tune then the stock truck 6.2. Not arguing that they are heavily detuned, all Chevy L's engines are detuned from the factory and have torque management software built into the ECU. This is done to limit warranty repairs because Chevy knows the power their engines CAN make and also knows that the rest of the stock drivetrain won't support the abuse that type of power lends itself too. What I'm saying is there is no way no how that a Stock 6.2 is going to be faster then a bolt on and tune 5.3. The 5.3 with headers, intake, and a good tune will make as much if not more power at the wheels then a stock 6.2, and the 5.3 is available in lighter vehicles then the 6.2. I'm not saying a 5.3 will make more power then a 6.2 in general, but saying a stock 6.2 can do it is just not accurate.
Plus the cam on the 5.3 dont kick in until 1500 rpm so the 6.2 is gonna have more jump
Joe Doole 295 hp stock in the 06 5.3. 420hp in the 6.2. Do the math. A tune and headers will not add more than 25-30 hp so?? Of course you have to factor in weight and aerodynamics and traction. But still
@@matthewgreen8335 the 5.3 has a stall tho. So even if it doesn't kick in until 1500 RPM his stall will compensate for it.
a man's truck vs a kids truck. 6.2 wins.
Bad AF, but definitely not stock lol
Spankymf Absolutely stock sir. Just a tune
+rekjavicxxx It shifts very aggressively and it's loud lol, badass truck though
a tune can add a lot of HP/TQ depending on how aggressive it is... not quite stock.
Definitely not stock LMAO
A tune isnt stock lol
6.2 only won because it had on 4hi, or it would’ve been spinning.
It's called Awd dumbass
That ain't bone stock lol
Big motor 4wd and the hit not very far
Stock 6.2.....uh huh....
it is stock that is what a truck sounds like when you floor it
He needs possi n gears to get out the hole
6.2 not stock.... it aint... I got one and I know
CRAAAAAP VIDEOS!!😭😭😭
Mine new Chevy would probably out run that
Yo también comenzaré a subir videos ! Tengo una cheyenne 5.3 síganme para mas contenido
Drag queens
You’re sooo good at driving in a straight line XD smh crack heads man
Silveraydo
PilgrimTitan Hahaha! Immortal
5.3 is a little motor for a truck. I want to do an 8.1 liter swap one day hehe
James Avery How? It's like 325ci, that's not exactly small. A 5.3 makes makes over 300hp and ft lb so It's plenty sufficient for a 1/2 ton. A stock 5.3 (or 4.8) Is capable of reliably producing 1000+hp.
For a truck its on the small side is what i mean. It's capable of a lot of power boosted sure..... and I will keep mine in my truck for now and upgrade it. It's just a bigger engine will make more torque and not have to be as radical as a smaller one.
My truck has a 8.3
2wd just spinning tire and has no torque all hp up top
I beat those big diesel trucks with my jetta TDI 2.0...
Try racing one from the 21st century? Even tuned 2.0 TDIs are god awful slow. I know they feel fast because they have so much torque, but they are still pretty slow. Atleast you get to have some fun and still get 40+mpg though, that's always nice.
Uh ok. I guess the 2009 dodge this morning doesnt count.
Ahh, yeah I would believe a Dodge. In stock trim they are just big heavy brutes that can tow a ton. The newer Fords and GMs are pretty quick for what they are.
And i kinda figured you would say that.
lone .crusaider It's true though, the Ram with the Cummins in by far the slowest diesel truck stock. They are like I said, big heavy brutes. The lighter GM trucks with thier duramax engines are the fastest stock. The 6.7 Powerstroke is quite a bit faster than a stock 6.7 Ram as well.
That's funny
Lol
Pushrod junk
NO WAY IN HELL IS THE 6.2 STOCK, OR THE 5.3 HAS A STUPID SHITTY TUNE and/or not spraying
depending on year of 5.3 if you have a 350 HP 5.3 then add Cam, headers and Nitrous and you can't beat a 403 HP 6.2L 4wd lifted truck. I would take it back to the shop that did the work and ask for a refund!
Kevin Diepenbrock That truck was pre '07 5.3L Probably an LM7 or L59 5.3L they were rated around 270 -295hp at the flywheel. If it is a mild cam and he didn't spray (like the owner said he didn't) he may only be making 370ish hp. And this is a Gen V L86 6.2L in this truck. 420hp, 460lb-ft.
I've literraly never seen a 6.2 vortec ever in that body style of silverado. that's some b's. the only vortec that came with that truck was a 4.8 5.3 6.0 never seen a 6.2 til the newer gen body style came out with the 6.2.
Sergio Zamora they introduced them in 2010.
In what bodystyle? The truck with the camera inside is the 6.2, the truck you see is the 5.3.
At first, the 6.2 was only available in the Sierra Denali if I'm not mistaken.
I have a 2012 crew cab LTZ Silverado with the 6.2L.. in Canada too. So we definitely got it a lot sooner than the facelift
JCOPP0LA33 the Yukon Denali, and Sierra Denali both had the 6.2 and 6spd in 07.
6.2 was the camera car but I‘m sure there are trucks here in Texas with ls3 swaps
Stock my as*. So funny when people bs about their ride. A 6.2 4x4 on 35's stock wouldn't stand a chance against a diesel deleted and an aggressive tune. No way no how. Not on planet earth lol. It's 400hp and 415 torque approx. A stock ecobeast will take one down from a dig to 70mph
China Motors. 7 out of 10 produced in China now ..
Brent Hill Except that all the truck motors are produced in Romulus MI.. Ask me how I know.
How do you know ? :)
Brent Hill lol. I did some plc programming there for their new tooling when they changed over.
And they both lose to a PowerStroke.
Jake S Did you watch the video? It beat the powerstroke in 2wd. Plus the 5.3 beat the 6.2 the second race. On a good launch the 5.3 is beating both of them
EGGINFOOLS actually the PSD beat it the first time and the 2nd time the Cheby driver jumped the horn.
jldude84 what?
What video were you Ford Fan girlies watching? The PowerJoke took a jump in the first and lost in the second. AND IT'S TUNED, (which can add 150+hp 200+lb-ft). The GM is stock on 35's, put it on stock 31's and it will be even further in the rear-view. I have dusted V8 Mustangs in my 6.2L, never mind a fat ass PowerJoke.
C Genious what a moron you are. You obviously didn't watch the video. Your piece of shit 6.2 can barely hang with a stock Civic. GTFO
This dmbass doesn't know the differences between stock or extended cabs.😂