From what I know of Dyson's reputation, he is a phenomenal mathematician; so it is both very great and humble of him to acknowledge Feynman's contribution to Dyson's own success; that is very admirable, the mathematics-applied-to-physics genius Dyson acknowledging the contribution of the overall-physics genius Feynman.
John Uscian Yup. He demonstrated the equivalence of Schwinger and Feynman's formulations of QED, and made important contributions to the perturbative calculation of scattering amplitudes, among other things. I don't know a lot about QED, but some of the experts believe Dyson may have also deserved a share of the Nobel for his work.
The series of 157 videos interviewing Dyson are fascinating. I don't think there is any other source for what Dyson says in those videos. And he consistently gives credit even-handedly where credit is due. By far my favorite living scientist.
Dyson is always incredibly entertaining to listen to; a most gifted and engaging storyteller and mathematician. Feynman was a most creative genius and a natural born physicist. Although Feynman, the physicist, preferred to work with the pictorial representations of mathematical expressions, we should not forget that he was a mathematical heavyweight, as well. His groundbreaking work on the path integral formulation is a triumphant case in point. That said, Feynman’s creative mind was overwhelmingly preoccupied with new and revolutionary ideas and original insights and he opted not to spend his time working on tidying up the mathematical loose ends.
Humble man when he talks about his collaboration with Richard Feynman. Wow that Feynman seemed like such a spirited human being. A genius he says, I am starting to believe he was a super genius to have mastered all regions of his brain, logic, artistic and emotional.
The work he's most famous for in the physics community is basically 2 papers that can be found in Schwinger's anthology of QED papers (which I own :) ); personal goal trying to understand those ancient hieroglyphs
@@pardismack I think that's the last thing he would do. He didn't need to pretend and certainly he didn't care about his public image. He was an extrovert and liked to show off, but there's no reason to suspect that his behaviour wasn't genuine, from his uncompromising enthusiasm to his proto-trolling. Great part of the public interested in him were other scientists, usually very clever people, often very sceptical. Do you think they'd just buy it? Do you have something to base your claim on? If not, why would you do such a great man an injustice? Out of envy?
@@cinskybuhsrandy5099 Yes he was an extrovert but he loves talking about women to appear as a womanizer as that was somehow celebrated at that period of time but in fact he was a family man and he prefers focusing on his family and on nerdy stuff
+semih oguzcan Yeah. We can see that he had a great appreciation for Feynman, so talking about him brought so many memories that his brain went all slow processing all the stories they lived together.
If you listen to his lectures that’s kind of his style it’s like he’s got this enormous computer storage drive in his brain and sometimes it takes a second when he puts a request in before it comes back out but when it comes back out it’s unbelievably brilliant every time.
This man was just so brilliant. I once read an exchange between him and Dawkins about evolution. Dyson was a physicist but was knowledgeable enough about biology to go head to head with Dawkins. He was not to be messed with intellectually.
In other words you're saying that this video had absolutely nothing to do with physics, and was just an old guy trying to remember a couple of people he knew of.
Freeman Dyson ,Yes whatever little I read and know I think you did a great job in mathematics even a beginner like me found it very remarkable the way it worked. Great job.
I believe this gentleman is credible. His body language reveals sincerity. I particularly call attention to what he says about Feynman. Others who have videos on UA-cam, featuring someone who claims to have "known" Feynman, show them -- when talking about Feynman -- putting him down and claiming he was self-absorbed, how much ego he had and how he tried to impress others with how smart he was, and just putting the man down incessantly. Which is inconsistent with 100% of the videos featuring Feynman himself. Whereby he exhibits none of this behavior they claim. Plus, much left out so as to deceive via omissions and commissions both. I have commented on those other videos but no one ever replies to challenge my assertions their guest is wrong. So, this is refreshing. To listen to him speak of Feynman about how Feynman actually was, rather than an erroneous perception due to some insecurity or having been a competitor who was outsmarted and embrassed perhaps by Feynman, who simplified their math and intentionally complex jargon. Anyway, this is a refreshing video.
I love how he mentions Feynamn because he is underrated. He spoke much more majestically and a he had an appreciation for the mundane and exquisite alike. Einstein is somewhat an anti-hero or a villain he lacks the morals to be the poster boy for physics
As a non-scientist, it's hard to understand why Dyson would say that Richard Feynman did the "hard work" when it was Dyson who had to develop the complex mathematical proofs.
Feynman came up with the idea. Dyson described it mathematically. An analogy would be Feynman being the inventor of a product, Dyson being the guy who actually works out the ways to manufacture it
“Newton” !?!?! Newton was a rarefied mathematician innovator (he invented calculus) and transformational theoretical physicist. Freeman Dyson has extraordinary accolades, but no original thought to set him apart.
@@readynowforever3676 Probably true about Freeman Dyson, but by his own admission (in "Disturbing The Universe") that wasn't his role, at least not in theoretical physics. He tidied up loose ends and solved problems in work other people had done rather than come up with original theories himself.
My Lord, I completely agree with you Thank you for expressing your kind sentiment with such elegance eloquence and brevity. Ever so grateful for the implicit compliment. I could go on but then...
I like Dyson, but saying that the world is getting greener and therefore preserves biodiversity is misleading. Certainly rain forests are being destroyed, and therefore entire ecosystems are being extinct. They are getting replaced by monoculture, so they still being green from a satellite. The main problem is this kind of destruction, that is what people have to fight against first. The world needs a people that don't necessary believe in climate change, but fight against monoculture, population growth, the destruction of biodiversity, and contamination. Since the real crisis is energy.
Climate change is not a belief. It's an observation based on data. It's causes are a question of well-tested theories and predictions confirmed by yet more accurate and complete observations and data. The loss of biodiversity and its causes are similarly a question of observations.
+Guy Souriandt: Your claims are way over-blown. It is a speculation based on some data, and with huge amount of assumptions at that. With that amount of assumption, particularly the vehemence with which most the supporters preach climate change without rigorous scientific deduction and proof, it is not too far from a religious belief.
The truth is Einstein hated Princeton, he addressed his letters as "Concentration Camp Princeton", and he refused to learn English. He only talked to the Mathematician Goedel in German (who starved himself to death in protesting the intellectual backwaterness of Princeton). Einstein realized, however painful it was, that the intellectual stimulation of German science made him who he was. The stillborn American social engineering at Princeton was a charade. Thats why he didn't achieve anything anymore, and he died a bitter man.
NorceCodine well Einstein has only himself to blame - he didn’t need to stay at Princeton, especially after the war. It’s a bit of a cop out that he would blame Princeton for his situation.
I dont want to put down Feynman, but this humble sentence "He did the real work and I tied it up afterwards" is a bit too much. I mean ideas are important, but also to put it in the mathematical framework...
digxx It's not like Feynman didnt have a mathematical method to his theory. He devised a method that could carry out calculations extremely quickly and arrived to the correct conclusion. The problem was that his method was virtually incomprehensable to everyone else. What Dyson did was make feynman's theory mathematically rigorous by translating it into a language people could underatand.
i think that he was considering his words carefully as this was an interview asking his opinions on other scientists. More people should consider their words as carefully.
Stephen Doty Murray Gell-Mann was himself enormously egotistical and self satisfied. So I could understand why someone like Feynman would cause Gell-Mann to feel very insecure and jealous.
+Stephen Doty this is the second comment section where i see you trying to trash feynman.. why watch videos of people praising him then.. some kind of inferiority complex? i mean you knew what this would be by the title... and the timestamp you cited was about einstein.
Andrew Deen You say, "i see you trying to trash feynman.." No, and shame on your for making such a false accusation. Feynman would detest your logic, for it is not an accurate inference from my comment, which is factual, stupid, as it recounts what Gell-Man said. And he knew Feynman personally. Evil idiots online, like you, seem to misconstrue others on purpose.
No you won't. It's true. Freeman Dyson is clearly struggling these days. He was always a little aloof when he spoke. But now he is well past 90, and this is what becomes of almost all of us at that age. Still pretty good all things considered, and a wonderful character too.
@Raw Bacon. Seriously. For such a brilliant man, I had hoped that his vacuum cleaners would be more affordable. But no. With all this brilliance, he could not produce a cheap but effective vacuum. Very, very disappointing. Ha ha.
The difference between then and now is... we only do science that we can get funded for... it's a great way to only do science that is approved by our benevolent government, and/or Big Pharma... kids in the US spend an inordinate amount of time learning fractions, which are used in US measures, but not elsewhere.... I ask, and am told, constantly... it's universally thought that math is hard... our medical "doctors" are only required to have one year of undergraduate chemistry... because real chemistry requires mathematics... and math is hard.... so we have a country full of people who cannot understand simple mathematics... science requires mathematics.. science is all about measuring the Universe we live in... I am going to change a few things, given the chance.... it's like "hello World " in every programming language I know... with a twist... watch out World... here I come
Fractions are hard, I still can't do all that stuff, I divide and use decimals.. ;;~》 problem solved... because it is easy to think in decimals... every kid in America learns how to sit up straight and pay attention, or a reasonable facsimile thereof, and the teacher teaches them that math is hard... because they don't hire mathematicians as first grade teachers... so they don't understand what they're teaching... To watch a real teacher, Richard Feynman is the best... because he makes it fun... doesn't give long drawn out explanations.. short concise explanations are his forté... he also translates from metric into American... we call it the Imperial measurement system... the Brits went metric long ago... it's American... because he knows the young folks in his audience don't understand metric.... Ronald Ray-gun locked us out of the metric system by saying the little dears would be confused by learning 2 measurement systems... his Alzheimer's riddled brain leads us still... that's why everyone thinks math is hard.. fractions are.. that's all they know... after 30 years, I finally got through to my wife, who says she doesn't understand metric.. it's because she doesn't understand American either, and I kept saying... if you can count to 10 you understand metric... finally, I told her... it's like making change for a dollar... bingo... every kid in America learns that before school even... far out man!
My father taught me calculus when I was 3.. by describing the flight of a ball as it is thrown... it included acceleration and deceleration, arcs and the tangent needed to calculate the arc... and the arc decreases over time... the laws of motion were in there... he was getting his first Master's in nuclear engineering at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey... my son got more or less the same lecture
The internet's collective circle jerk over Nikola Tesla is as pathetic as it is sickening. The guy was noteworthy, but a long way from the likes of the QM crowd.
Einstein was very intelligent, that may be true, but on the other hand he was a terrible person. Just read his biography, and you see how he treated his wife and how selfish he was. I am a physicist and i have always been fascinated by him, but as i read his biography, i was shocked....
10 років тому+71
"Terrible person" is hyperbole. Was he perfect? No. Was he a humanist? Yes. Did he stand up for civil rights, segregation, anti-semitism, and gender discrimination? YES. Did he lead the science community in advocating nuclear disarmament during the so-called Pugwash movement after Nagasaki? YES. Did he donate his Nobel Prize money to his wife? YES. Please do not desecrate the great man considering you CLEARLY don't know much about the man.
10 років тому+17
In fact, now I KNOW you didn't read his biography. Which one, Walter Isaacson's seminal bio, Douglas Stone's, Abraham Pais'? Im curious, b/c I know more about Einstein than most people and your comment is patently false. Ugly divorces happen but c'mon don't misrepresent the man, that's unethical. Wikipedia is NOT a citable source.
Want to get Smarter, Faster?
Subscribe for DAILY videos: bigth.ink/GetSmarter
Older folks talking about their experiences is so gold
Especially the elderly elves.
Particularly the older folks who have made incredible intellectual contributions in the areas that enhance human understanding of the universe.
Look up project Orion it might change your outlook. Dyson is so next level you’ll never know probably for years and years what he really did.
Especially scientists
Gifted older folks. Mediocre ones just talk nonsense.
RIP Freeman Dyson. He leaves behind an unforgettable legacy.
From what I know of Dyson's reputation, he is a phenomenal mathematician; so it is both very great and humble of him to acknowledge Feynman's contribution to Dyson's own success; that is very admirable, the mathematics-applied-to-physics genius Dyson acknowledging the contribution of the overall-physics genius Feynman.
John Uscian Yup. He demonstrated the equivalence of Schwinger and Feynman's formulations of QED, and made important contributions to the perturbative calculation of scattering amplitudes, among other things. I don't know a lot about QED, but some of the experts believe Dyson may have also deserved a share of the Nobel for his work.
Too bad he could not overcome the influence of ingrained mysticism which corrupted his ability to reason.
The series of 157 videos interviewing Dyson are fascinating. I don't think there is any other source for what Dyson says in those videos. And he consistently gives credit even-handedly where credit is due. By far my favorite living scientist.
It's called mathematical physics.
A 5 day road trip with Dyson and Feynman. I would do that.
"You would do?" :) best joke brother :)
Yeah, just be a smart as Dyson and you'll be up next!
I would watch it. Entire 5 day documentary..
What a humble genius. He will be missed. Thank goodness he leaves so much to posterity.
Yes. So humble he didn't even mention his involvement in Operation Gomorrah.
Thank you Sir Dyson for your help and collaboration and support (great job on the mathematics!!:), I hope to see you soon, peace and love, Doug.
Very impressive - straight to the point - a lot better than TED talk cosmetics
Dyson is always incredibly entertaining to listen to; a most gifted and engaging storyteller and mathematician. Feynman was a most creative genius and a natural born physicist. Although Feynman, the physicist, preferred to work with the pictorial representations of mathematical expressions, we should not forget that he was a mathematical heavyweight, as well. His groundbreaking work on the path integral formulation is a triumphant case in point. That said, Feynman’s creative mind was overwhelmingly preoccupied with new and revolutionary ideas and original insights and he opted not to spend his time working on tidying up the mathematical loose ends.
Humble man when he talks about his collaboration with Richard Feynman. Wow that Feynman seemed like such a spirited human being. A genius he says, I am starting to believe he was a super genius to have mastered all regions of his brain, logic, artistic and emotional.
the dyson sphere is often referred to as freeman dysons most famous work but I think the Dyson tree is amazing too.. Living legend
The work he's most famous for in the physics community is basically 2 papers that can be found in Schwinger's anthology of QED papers (which I own :) ); personal goal trying to understand those ancient hieroglyphs
His work on vacuums sucked.
@@jacobshirley3457 I'm also not fan.
@@punkisinthedetails1470 Cool.
@@jacobshirley3457 Not as cool as I'd like. His fans blow.
How humble these amazing people can be, we're just lucky to hear these stories!
Thank God for recordings that I(we) can hear and see such great gifts like Mr. Dyson talking about other great people.
He'd tell stories most of which were true 😁
That's the best you can do.
Feynman knew how to sell himself to the public with an image that was somehow farfetched from who he is in reality.
Implying some were not.
@@pardismack I think that's the last thing he would do. He didn't need to pretend and certainly he didn't care about his public image. He was an extrovert and liked to show off, but there's no reason to suspect that his behaviour wasn't genuine, from his uncompromising enthusiasm to his proto-trolling. Great part of the public interested in him were other scientists, usually very clever people, often very sceptical. Do you think they'd just buy it? Do you have something to base your claim on? If not, why would you do such a great man an injustice? Out of envy?
@@cinskybuhsrandy5099 Yes he was an extrovert but he loves talking about women to appear as a womanizer as that was somehow celebrated at that period of time but in fact he was a family man and he prefers focusing on his family and on nerdy stuff
When I think he get lost and gave up, he continues and manages to tie up the sentences very nicely at the end :D
+semih oguzcan Yeah. We can see that he had a great appreciation for Feynman, so talking about him brought so many memories that his brain went all slow processing all the stories they lived together.
If you listen to his lectures that’s kind of his style it’s like he’s got this enormous computer storage drive in his brain and sometimes it takes a second when he puts a request in before it comes back out but when it comes back out it’s unbelievably brilliant every time.
That's what I enjoyed most about his speech.
Typical intj alike thinking looking from outside.
This man was just so brilliant. I once read an exchange between him and Dawkins about evolution. Dyson was a physicist but was knowledgeable enough about biology to go head to head with Dawkins. He was not to be messed with intellectually.
" Physics in the Days of Einstein and Feynman "
A Fantastic Title !
And a good video to watch :)
In other words you're saying that this video had absolutely nothing to do with physics, and was just an old guy trying to remember a couple of people he knew of.
Love watching him
One of the towering intellects of the 20th century and a foil to the manic genius of Richard Feynman
Where most would rather go dumb than tell the truth, this man right here would rather do the same than tell a lie...or even embellish. Respect.
Freeman Dyson ,Yes whatever little I read and know I think you did a great job in mathematics even a beginner like me found it very remarkable the way it worked. Great job.
Richard Feynman was also a very good bongo player
Thank you for your contribution sir.
I believe this gentleman is credible. His body language reveals sincerity. I particularly call attention to what he says about Feynman. Others who have videos on UA-cam, featuring someone who claims to have "known" Feynman, show them -- when talking about Feynman -- putting him down and claiming he was self-absorbed, how much ego he had and how he tried to impress others with how smart he was, and just putting the man down incessantly. Which is inconsistent with 100% of the videos featuring Feynman himself. Whereby he exhibits none of this behavior they claim. Plus, much left out so as to deceive via omissions and commissions both. I have commented on those other videos but no one ever replies to challenge my assertions their guest is wrong. So, this is refreshing. To listen to him speak of Feynman about how Feynman actually was, rather than an erroneous perception due to some insecurity or having been a competitor who was outsmarted and embrassed perhaps by Feynman, who simplified their math and intentionally complex jargon. Anyway, this is a refreshing video.
nah not really, he just takes the time to think about his answers. (more people should do that imo) :)
I love how he mentions Feynamn because he is underrated. He spoke much more majestically and a he had an appreciation for the mundane and exquisite alike. Einstein is somewhat an anti-hero or a villain he lacks the morals to be the poster boy for physics
They collaborated on what was called the Feynman-Dyson equation..
As a non-scientist, it's hard to understand why Dyson would say that Richard Feynman did the "hard work" when it was Dyson who had to develop the complex mathematical proofs.
I think it shows how humble of a person he is and that makes him more respectable.
Feynman came up with the idea. Dyson described it mathematically.
An analogy would be Feynman being the inventor of a product, Dyson being the guy who actually works out the ways to manufacture it
Dyson is a true contrarian, and I really admire him.
Love this guy. He was a living Newton. So sad he recently Passed.
“Newton” !?!?!
Newton was a rarefied mathematician innovator (he invented calculus) and transformational theoretical physicist.
Freeman Dyson has extraordinary accolades, but no original thought to set him apart.
@@readynowforever3676 Probably true about Freeman Dyson, but by his own admission (in "Disturbing The Universe") that wasn't his role, at least not in theoretical physics. He tidied up loose ends and solved problems in work other people had done rather than come up with original theories himself.
@@Treviscoe Fair enough
Newton? No.
Such a humble man 😍
RIP Freeman Dyson (died 28.2.2020)
You can see how much he is visualizing what he is thinking about and visualizing memories i am sure.
Freeman Dyson.....one of the smartest man ever lived....
God bless him and his brilliant mind. The beauty he's given the world, through thought, is immeasurable.
"He was a wonderful person to be around. In addition, he was a genius." Lmao, love this guy
I wish that as you grow older your intuition and cognitive capabilities got better so that people would have more to hope for
Is he ( in the video ) who proposed Dyson sphere ..
Yes, he is.
@Gururaj Deshpande No, no, he's the inventor of the Dyson vacuum cleaner.
@@Atanu lol
Great stuff. Thank you.
Excellent man.
"Feynman told stories about himself, most of which were true"
A wonderful person Mr. Dyson
Great experience for you. Than you for sharing!!!
Watched all of it 0:15
Thanks😊
These people are true gods on our planet. Mankind is really blessed to have them.
Humankind
Sarosh Khan Really?
@@SilentAdventurer stfu
Derek Shelton yes, really.
My Lord, I completely agree with you Thank you for expressing your kind sentiment with such elegance eloquence and brevity. Ever so grateful for the implicit compliment. I could go on but then...
RIP Freeman Dyson.
Very interesting
my class is taught in solitary confeynment, while everyone is listening in to the lecture.
He was. Also, he's the closest thing I ever had or probably will have for an authority.
I like Dyson, but saying that the world is getting greener and therefore preserves biodiversity is misleading. Certainly rain forests are being destroyed, and therefore entire ecosystems are being extinct. They are getting replaced by monoculture, so they still being green from a satellite. The main problem is this kind of destruction, that is what people have to fight against first.
The world needs a people that don't necessary believe in climate change, but fight against monoculture, population growth, the destruction of biodiversity, and contamination. Since the real crisis is energy.
+Frank Zaka
Why is this a crisis?
Climate change is not a belief. It's an observation based on data. It's causes are a question of well-tested theories and predictions confirmed by yet more accurate and complete observations and data. The loss of biodiversity and its causes are similarly a question of observations.
Could you point to someone or an article that claims that climate does not change?
+Guy Souriandt: Your claims are way over-blown. It is a speculation based on some data, and with huge amount of assumptions at that. With that amount of assumption, particularly the vehemence with which most the supporters preach climate change without rigorous scientific deduction and proof, it is not too far from a religious belief.
climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
The truth is Einstein hated Princeton, he addressed his letters as "Concentration Camp Princeton", and he refused to learn English. He only talked to the Mathematician Goedel in German (who starved himself to death in protesting the intellectual backwaterness of Princeton). Einstein realized, however painful it was, that the intellectual stimulation of German science made him who he was. The stillborn American social engineering at Princeton was a charade. Thats why he didn't achieve anything anymore, and he died a bitter man.
NorceCodine well Einstein has only himself to blame - he didn’t need to stay at Princeton, especially after the war. It’s a bit of a cop out that he would blame Princeton for his situation.
Feynman ♥️ feynman ♥️ feynman ♥️
Dyson's nose and ears are exceptional.
I dont want to put down Feynman, but this humble sentence "He did the real work and I tied it up afterwards" is a bit too much. I mean ideas are important, but also to put it in the mathematical framework...
digxx
It's not like Feynman didnt have a mathematical method to his theory. He devised a method that could carry out calculations extremely quickly and arrived to the correct conclusion. The problem was that his method was virtually incomprehensable to everyone else. What Dyson did was make feynman's theory mathematically rigorous by translating it into a language people could underatand.
where can get prof Dyson's cool tie?
You can try to hunt him down and force him to give it to you. Otherwise you will have to be satisfied with a replica.
What an awesome necktie.
His brain was buffering.. Despite being a great physicis and theorist, his mind is probably getting a bit slower.
Dalroc maybe his body is slow
i think that he was considering his words carefully as this was an interview asking his opinions on other scientists. More people should consider their words as carefully.
He was like 90 years old lol.
RIP old boy
1:40 Gell-Man spoke of how Feynman had a big ego and struggled to cultivate his own legend.
Stephen Doty Murray Gell-Mann was himself enormously egotistical and self satisfied. So I could understand why someone like Feynman would cause Gell-Mann to feel very insecure and jealous.
l2ic3 Aha, interesting counterpoint.
+Stephen Doty this is the second comment section where i see you trying to trash feynman.. why watch videos of people praising him then.. some kind of inferiority complex? i mean you knew what this would be by the title... and the timestamp you cited was about einstein.
Andrew Deen You say, "i see you trying to trash feynman.." No, and shame on your for making such a false accusation. Feynman would detest your logic, for it is not an accurate inference from my comment, which is factual, stupid, as it recounts what Gell-Man said. And he knew Feynman personally. Evil idiots online, like you, seem to misconstrue others on purpose.
+Stephen Doty ...Gell-Man was a peacock....
0:44 I thought my sound went
I'll go to hell for this but this dude made me think that the video was buffering...
Don't you think it'd take a tad bit more to go to hell?
I thought the same thing but I haven't seen a lot of videos of him
No you won't. It's true. Freeman Dyson is clearly struggling these days. He was always a little aloof when he spoke. But now he is well past 90, and this is what becomes of almost all of us at that age. Still pretty good all things considered, and a wonderful character too.
Nikhil Pandey omg
Lol me too!
when Mr. Dyson said
"..and he told stories about himself, most of which were true"
Knowing how outrageous they are, that's already saying much to RF credit!
Who saw the ad?
war is a trap bigthink prepare for more planets and thruths big love you got it
Only Dyson can says that Einstein was a clown 😹😹😹😹
i'm grateful to have heard this gracious comment while this man could still deliver it. i pray there is a heaven for such a person.
His cable gets unplugged sometimes
a genius without a phd . freeman dyson .RIP
OMG, he look like John Forbes Nash o_O
RIP Mr.Dyson
I miss hearing Freeman speak
I thought this was going to be about how concepts differed back then, not just celebrity gossip.
He was a STUDENT during the QM days? Good Lord. No wonder he didn't need a PhD.
Apparently Feynman was a Feyn man
RIP 🙏
His vacuums cost too much.
@Raw Bacon. Seriously. For such a brilliant man, I had hoped that his vacuum cleaners would be more affordable. But no. With all this brilliance, he could not produce a cheap but effective vacuum. Very, very disappointing.
Ha ha.
RIP
I,’m a bachelor
Einstein was somewhat ambidextrous.
The difference between then and now is... we only do science that we can get funded for... it's a great way to only do science that is approved by our benevolent government, and/or Big Pharma... kids in the US spend an inordinate amount of time learning fractions, which are used in US measures, but not elsewhere.... I ask, and am told, constantly... it's universally thought that math is hard... our medical "doctors" are only required to have one year of undergraduate chemistry... because real chemistry requires mathematics... and math is hard.... so we have a country full of people who cannot understand simple mathematics... science requires mathematics.. science is all about measuring the Universe we live in... I am going to change a few things, given the chance.... it's like "hello World " in every programming language I know... with a twist... watch out World... here I come
Which is why people think getting 15 bucks an hour will end poverty... and we now have 15 dollhair hamburgers... duh!
Fractions are hard, I still can't do all that stuff, I divide and use decimals.. ;;~》 problem solved... because it is easy to think in decimals... every kid in America learns how to sit up straight and pay attention, or a reasonable facsimile thereof, and the teacher teaches them that math is hard... because they don't hire mathematicians as first grade teachers... so they don't understand what they're teaching... To watch a real teacher, Richard Feynman is the best... because he makes it fun... doesn't give long drawn out explanations.. short concise explanations are his forté... he also translates from metric into American... we call it the Imperial measurement system... the Brits went metric long ago... it's American... because he knows the young folks in his audience don't understand metric.... Ronald Ray-gun locked us out of the metric system by saying the little dears would be confused by learning 2 measurement systems... his Alzheimer's riddled brain leads us still... that's why everyone thinks math is hard.. fractions are.. that's all they know... after 30 years, I finally got through to my wife, who says she doesn't understand metric.. it's because she doesn't understand American either, and I kept saying... if you can count to 10 you understand metric... finally, I told her... it's like making change for a dollar... bingo... every kid in America learns that before school even... far out man!
My father taught me calculus when I was 3.. by describing the flight of a ball as it is thrown... it included acceleration and deceleration, arcs and the tangent needed to calculate the arc... and the arc decreases over time... the laws of motion were in there... he was getting his first Master's in nuclear engineering at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey... my son got more or less the same lecture
He was in college level calculus in 7th grade.. he could do it all along.. it's not hard at all
Young folks getting chances to learn from the giants themselves are lucky.
What a waste it is to have Freeman Dyson in the room and only ask him about other people...
Freeman has Yoda ears
So he was 87 back then...
highlights 0:49, 1:18, 3:08
Very misleading title.
forgot tesla??
The internet's collective circle jerk over Nikola Tesla is as pathetic as it is sickening. The guy was noteworthy, but a long way from the likes of the QM crowd.
Watch Bill Burr on plastic surgery... you ll reconsider your statement.
He is nearly 90 years old you people making fun couldn't survive also for this many years leave about speaking in a video
Exactly 🤣 I'd probably be dead by 70.
Every time he paused i kept thinking the video was buffering.
"Most of which were true" :)
Programming is a craft.
Old age is a disease, let's solve this and get on with it. What a legend
Rip
"...most of which were true." 🤣
He is underestimating himself. That's humble but not good for a scientist. It's going in a log, we have to make corrections now...
He was a great joker
Einstein was very intelligent, that may be true, but on the other hand he was a terrible person. Just read his biography, and you see how he treated his wife and how selfish he was. I am a physicist and i have always been fascinated by him, but as i read his biography, i was shocked....
"Terrible person" is hyperbole. Was he perfect? No. Was he a humanist? Yes. Did he stand up for civil rights, segregation, anti-semitism, and gender discrimination? YES. Did he lead the science community in advocating nuclear disarmament during the so-called Pugwash movement after Nagasaki? YES. Did he donate his Nobel Prize money to his wife? YES. Please do not desecrate the great man considering you CLEARLY don't know much about the man.
In fact, now I KNOW you didn't read his biography. Which one, Walter Isaacson's seminal bio, Douglas Stone's, Abraham Pais'? Im curious, b/c I know more about Einstein than most people and your comment is patently false. Ugly divorces happen but c'mon don't misrepresent the man, that's unethical. Wikipedia is NOT a citable source.
Doruk Bıyıklı what? really? why?
Doruk Bıyıklı
ye, why dude?
Geniuses often are very manly.
You know, smart people can be wrong about things too...
Really?
Oh my gosh!
Who'd'a thought?
Printed twice for luck.
sound 80 when your 40.