Wow. Why was that chick brought into testify. Almost every single answer she gave was that she didn’t know or she wasn’t aware of. Thanks. Real helpful
I think that was the exact reason as to why she was testifying. As someone in her position she should know a lot more about these matters, but the corporate culture at OceanGate deliberately kept information from her. Just in the same way as the head of engineering testified to not making the final engineering decisions. This testimony is very helpful in showing how the business was operating. Stockton bullied his way to get what he wanted and he created a dangerous corporate culture that was persistent throughout the organization.
Correct.. she was full of Sh!t.. Coached and pee rehearsed with that pr!ck of an attorney. How do these two sleep nights. She knows far more.. you could se.. it was obvious. Also the dumb as chairing this enquiry is P!ss weak.. & biased towards Oceangate in this instance.. Grow a backbone people on the board. Stick it to em. Oceangate fcuked up .
I appreciate you, Stanley. You're right, this tragedy of lives was no accident, as Stockton was well knowledgeable of what was impending. Had any of the "mission specialists" (what a joke that is) that died that day known what Stockton knew they wouldn't have gone down.
Oceangate: They are paying passengers, they are not passengers, they are explorers and investors, but lets sell tickets to passengers, and advertise public access to rich people passengers, but they are explorers who know everything, but we are not going to tell them anything, these explorer Billionaire passengers. And invite a young man in his 20's who knows NOTHING about any of it.
Stockton Rush was fond of referring to himself and the people on his "dives" as "deep sea explorers." This is laughable. Robert Ballard is a true deep-sea explorer. James Cameron is more of an "explorer" than Stockton Rush was. The people who went onto that Pringles can with that charlatan were a mash-up of delusional adrenaline junkies from various demographics.
"Hey I don't think experimental deep-sea pressure vessels should have unexplained loud bangs upon surfacing" "Sounds like you don't have 'an explorer mindset', Holly"
People are not seeing what they are. They believe the door ( weighing almost a ton ) Hanging off the front of the sub. Stared the debonding of the hull. It’s funny how the rear bell managed to stay intact during and after the implosion. The force required to rip that off, magnifying a ton at 4 feet if you understand mechanical load transfer. I believe it started there. The propitiation shows that
It felt like this submarine guy was going out of his way to make himself appear like a yokel. - Fine, you don't own a suit, but turning up to an investigative hearing wearing a green polo shirt and vest? Is that all you have? - Tells the board that he began building his first sub after observing a welder he hired for a day. Took maiden voyage on the day he graduated college, presumably for an unrelated subject. Throws in much later as an afterthought, that it was the first undersea glider. Wouldn't it have sounded better if he'd said "I built my first sub whilst in college, a design which was lauded as the first of its kind yadda yadda". - Says he started his career by exploiting legal loopholes and got in trouble with the Coast guard because of uncertainty of his sub's status. Dude, this doesn't make you look good at all. - Met a man who makes cool tyres, who introduced him to the mayor of his town (golly gee whillickers) and got a great deal on an aircraft hanger to build his next sub. A better story: "I spent two years in research and development of sub 2, and selected this location because of its proximity to a lake and friendly local govt yadda yadda". - Talks about "I" and "my sub". Sure, he's just a one-man outfit, but would probably sound more authoritative if he used the royal "we". - Has a weird answer for why he doesn't require his passengers to sign waivers. Something like, "why would it matter because I'd be dead too". - Didn't seem to understand what certification means, and thinks it's when you receive a certificate, as opposed to achieved a standardised level of competence. - Lots of "I read about it in a Wired article". Dude, why are you even there, in that case? - Sooo much speculation based on little more then heresay. Like, who cares that there was a TV crew when your subs materials were getting tested. Maybe it affected their rating or not, but it makes you sound like a simpleton to suggest so at such a high-stakes hearing - Weird details, like saying that he has slept in the sub at 2,000 feet. Is this normal? Why were you asleep? This opens up questions - Says he has thought a lot about Stockton Rush's psychology, but doesn't seem to have an answer of why Rush invited him for the test voyage. I think I know the reason, and it's not because you're a "fellow sub enthusiast". - Tries to bring the Bohemian Grove into his narrative. Sure, maybe Stockton Rush is associated with the people who attended Bohemian Grove, but that detail is all a bit infowarsy and makes you sound like you're about to call Rush an Illuminati lizard. Heck, this was so cringe to watch.
Also- one of the most experienced submersible pilots - ever- and told Stockton - in writing - over and over his sub would fail. Stockton was not associated with Bohemian Club- he was a member, as was his father, as were most of the investors in Oceangate-
Wow. Why was that chick brought into testify. Almost every single answer she gave was that she didn’t know or she wasn’t aware of. Thanks. Real helpful
I think that was the exact reason as to why she was testifying. As someone in her position she should know a lot more about these matters, but the corporate culture at OceanGate deliberately kept information from her. Just in the same way as the head of engineering testified to not making the final engineering decisions. This testimony is very helpful in showing how the business was operating. Stockton bullied his way to get what he wanted and he created a dangerous corporate culture that was persistent throughout the organization.
Correct.. she was full of Sh!t.. Coached and pee rehearsed with that pr!ck of an attorney. How do these two sleep nights. She knows far more.. you could se.. it was obvious. Also the dumb as chairing this enquiry is P!ss weak.. & biased towards Oceangate in this instance.. Grow a backbone people on the board. Stick it to em. Oceangate fcuked up .
I appreciate you, Stanley. You're right, this tragedy of lives was no accident, as Stockton was well knowledgeable of what was impending. Had any of the "mission specialists" (what a joke that is) that died that day known what Stockton knew they wouldn't have gone down.
Except for PH, he knew.
@@newhorizon4066 he knew and didn't care or didn't know but didn't care ua-cam.com/video/DuJ9IrQetqw/v-deo.htmlsi=0A3kgmM6XeoKqlhu
thank you
Another Stockton Stooge in the HR department. She definitely used bully boy tactics on the software engineer who tried to raise safety concerns
Karl is the second guy who said they slept out on a hammock.
"energize your button"
You mean turn it on mate
She does not remember she sounds like the Iran Contra hearings
"I Have No Clear Memory of that"
Wouldn't hire her to clean my toilet.
Oceangate: They are paying passengers, they are not passengers, they are explorers and investors, but lets sell tickets to passengers, and advertise public access to rich people passengers, but they are explorers who know everything, but we are not going to tell them anything, these explorer Billionaire passengers. And invite a young man in his 20's who knows NOTHING about any of it.
Solving a Rubik cube was an essential part of controls for the dive!
The young man was 19, not even and adult yet… 😢
Stockton Rush was fond of referring to himself and the people on his "dives" as "deep sea explorers." This is laughable. Robert Ballard is a true deep-sea explorer. James Cameron is more of an "explorer" than Stockton Rush was. The people who went onto that Pringles can with that charlatan were a mash-up of delusional adrenaline junkies from various demographics.
OceanGate, Heaven's Gate.
Stocktons now The Devils Advocate..
"Hey I don't think experimental deep-sea pressure vessels should have unexplained loud bangs upon surfacing"
"Sounds like you don't have 'an explorer mindset', Holly"
One big fraud.
People are not seeing what they are. They believe the door ( weighing almost a ton )
Hanging off the front of the sub. Stared the debonding of the hull.
It’s funny how the rear bell managed to stay intact during and after the implosion.
The force required to rip that off, magnifying a ton at 4 feet if you understand mechanical load transfer.
I believe it started there.
The propitiation shows that
A bit ironic when a pot calls a kettle black Stanley...get your sub certified first...
Well I know which sub is of chosen out of Oceangates & his..
Dishonesty right here folks.
It felt like this submarine guy was going out of his way to make himself appear like a yokel.
- Fine, you don't own a suit, but turning up to an investigative hearing wearing a green polo shirt and vest? Is that all you have?
- Tells the board that he began building his first sub after observing a welder he hired for a day. Took maiden voyage on the day he graduated college, presumably for an unrelated subject. Throws in much later as an afterthought, that it was the first undersea glider. Wouldn't it have sounded better if he'd said "I built my first sub whilst in college, a design which was lauded as the first of its kind yadda yadda".
- Says he started his career by exploiting legal loopholes and got in trouble with the Coast guard because of uncertainty of his sub's status. Dude, this doesn't make you look good at all.
- Met a man who makes cool tyres, who introduced him to the mayor of his town (golly gee whillickers) and got a great deal on an aircraft hanger to build his next sub. A better story: "I spent two years in research and development of sub 2, and selected this location because of its proximity to a lake and friendly local govt yadda yadda".
- Talks about "I" and "my sub". Sure, he's just a one-man outfit, but would probably sound more authoritative if he used the royal "we".
- Has a weird answer for why he doesn't require his passengers to sign waivers. Something like, "why would it matter because I'd be dead too".
- Didn't seem to understand what certification means, and thinks it's when you receive a certificate, as opposed to achieved a standardised level of competence.
- Lots of "I read about it in a Wired article". Dude, why are you even there, in that case?
- Sooo much speculation based on little more then heresay. Like, who cares that there was a TV crew when your subs materials were getting tested. Maybe it affected their rating or not, but it makes you sound like a simpleton to suggest so at such a high-stakes hearing
- Weird details, like saying that he has slept in the sub at 2,000 feet. Is this normal? Why were you asleep? This opens up questions
- Says he has thought a lot about Stockton Rush's psychology, but doesn't seem to have an answer of why Rush invited him for the test voyage. I think I know the reason, and it's not because you're a "fellow sub enthusiast".
- Tries to bring the Bohemian Grove into his narrative. Sure, maybe Stockton Rush is associated with the people who attended Bohemian Grove, but that detail is all a bit infowarsy and makes you sound like you're about to call Rush an Illuminati lizard.
Heck, this was so cringe to watch.
Also- one of the most experienced submersible pilots - ever- and told Stockton - in writing - over and over his sub would fail. Stockton was not associated with Bohemian Club- he was a member, as was his father, as were most of the investors in Oceangate-
Best comment 👍
You don't have an explorers mindset
One big fraud.