Why Scientists Think the Universe is a Giant Brain

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @Carlos.Explains
    @Carlos.Explains  Місяць тому +4

    0:00 Intro
    0:57 Structure: 5 Basic, 3 Advanced Concepts
    5:40 Dynamics: Self-Organization, Information Flow, Fractals
    10:55 Implications: Erwin Schrödinger, Sabine Hossenfelder, AI

  • @gameboardgames
    @gameboardgames Місяць тому +13

    As above, so below.

  • @mootytootyfrooty
    @mootytootyfrooty Місяць тому +5

    Yoo I've been saying it does appear in the pattern of a kind of organism. If anything it just helps reaffirm our "scale free" mathematics, where raw energy dynamics rule, and on top of that the brain is a kind of mirror of that overall system since it needs an efficient, generalized predictive topology - meaning it needs to be "in agreement" with the surrounding system, especially as something that evolved slowly and against the sort of raw influences of time and environment.
    BTW I came across a fun random paper called "Illusory Ego Theory" by Tsuji Jun, by an informally educated Japanese Buddhist monk in the mid 1920s around the change from a brief liberal democracy into the Imperial Japan that went on to invade others. You might get a kick out of it, it totally took me by surprise.

    • @Carlos.Explains
      @Carlos.Explains  Місяць тому

      @@mootytootyfrooty thanks for sharing, I’ll check it out!

    • @maesk52
      @maesk52 16 днів тому

      This completely resonated with me and reminded me of the Whiteheadian philosophy of organism, 3:00 so I’d like to put it out there since you noticed the organism in process of becoming 🫶🏾 process and reality (1917) is a grand effort in describing just that process in which the many become one and are increased by one.

    • @Carlos.Explains
      @Carlos.Explains  16 днів тому +1

      @ thanks! You will probably enjoy my video on the cosmic ouroboros too 😀. ua-cam.com/video/qsGv_HyhEM4/v-deo.htmlsi=YpVn0EGSpNCLIb1o

  • @AlexanderDRamos
    @AlexanderDRamos Місяць тому +7

    I've never heard such bunch of bullshit make sense by a simple comparison table

    • @pabloguzman8472
      @pabloguzman8472 5 днів тому

      lol this idea of "galaxy brain" is super old😂

  • @GIZMOGNOM3
    @GIZMOGNOM3 Місяць тому +4

    Very skeptical but entertained

  • @givemorephilosophy
    @givemorephilosophy Місяць тому +5

    2:08 Coexistence is the design😊😊😊 Everything is just being in order...
    No Randomness 🙏🙏

  • @jaretwalker3513
    @jaretwalker3513 Місяць тому

    I really enjoyed this video. Interesting topic, well done.

  • @Bathing_in_NOISE
    @Bathing_in_NOISE Місяць тому +4

    This is very interesting, but the main thing I’m wondering is what the computational/functional output of the universe would be? If the universe is a mind, what does it do?

    • @GoodBaleadaMusic
      @GoodBaleadaMusic Місяць тому +4

      What do we do? Why did we break the fourth wall of reality when other animals seemingly can't? Why are we alone in this self awareness with no instruction manual? (We probably just killed the others a million years ago lol)

    • @PrivateSi
      @PrivateSi Місяць тому

      This is just religious nonsense for people with half a brain... If you think the 'ultimate question' is WHY we are here you are a deranged child in an adult's body. The vid is ridiculous. Sci-woo for woo-woo fans.

    • @Bathing_in_NOISE
      @Bathing_in_NOISE Місяць тому +1

      These are all valuable questions but not really relevant to what I was asking. Any given mind that you can point to in nature creates a system-environment distinction which it uses perform a set of functions. For instance, we use pattern recognition in order to more easily navigate complicated terrain. We don't have the stable neuronal structures in our brain just for fun, they can rather be understood as 'hardware' resultant from evolutionary optimization procedures. Creating such a structure as the brain enables cognitive acts like pattern recognition to more easily occur.
      So, what I'm asking is what is the universe's 'environment'? What does the universe act upon? Itself? If so, what functions does it carry out upon itself?

    • @panhandlesomen
      @panhandlesomen Місяць тому +3

      ​@@GoodBaleadaMusicrip our cousins

    • @PrivateSi
      @PrivateSi Місяць тому

      The evidence says the universe does something more like this, as it's not a mind, so don't ask Why it/you exists people! Childish nonsense PERSONIFIED!... The standard model is full of undetectable / poorly detected, made up fudge
      --
      POLECTRON FIELD: cell: a + & a - particle split by Full Split Energy as a positron+ & electron-. Bonds to 12 neighbours
      MATTER: positron (+-+) / electron (-+-). Partially Splits (polarises) surrounding field cells as + & - shells. core types: +, -, +-. +-+, -+-
      SPIN: centre polarisation axis
      LECKY: absolute charge (+ve and -ve added, not cancelled).
      MASS: particle lecky, total charge density.
      INERTIA: Field rebalances behind mass kicking it forward
      STRONG GRAVITY: field repels mass from all directions
      MOND: lecky density slows acceleration/TIME and shrinks cells, loss to gravity gradients grows voids, aids acceleration
      BIG BANG: more proton-antiproton pairs malformed as proton-muon than antiproton-antimuon so hydrogen beat antihydrogen
      POSITRONIUM: e_p. Muon: ep_e. Proton: pep. Neutron: pep_e. Tau: epep_e. Neutron mass is halfway between muon and tau
      ANTIMATTER: 1,2 e_p pairs annihilate. 3: proton+anti proton or muon+anti muon. 4: neutron+anti neutron. 5: tau+anti tau
      WEAK FORCE: unstable atoms form and annihilate e_p pairs, possibly due to a neutrino hit if the really exist
      BETA- DECAY: pep_e => pep e.
      BETA+: pep + new e_p => pep_e p
      NUCLEAR FORCE: neutron electrons bond to protons.
      ENTANGLEMENT: correlation broken by interaction? Physical link?
      BLACK HOLE: atoms cut into neutrons fused as higher mass tau cores (epep). Field rotates. Core annihilates: ep => cell?
      PHOTON: cell polarisation (partial split) left-right, cell movement up-down, as a wave.
      LONGITUDINAL WAVE: gravitational wave, neutrino: 1 to 3 cell wave
      DOUBLE SLIT: photon/particle field warps diffract and interfere, guiding the core. Detectors interfere with guides

  • @payvibaby
    @payvibaby Місяць тому +2

    I’ve been saying for years….

  • @spiralsun1
    @spiralsun1 Місяць тому +3

    Thank you for this video and beautiful message ❤

  • @Italianjedi7
    @Italianjedi7 26 днів тому

    You presented this topic so well and I always speculated this but the one thing that takes me out is the memory capacity. I sincerely don’t believe the brain can only store 2.5 petabytes. Assigning such an arbitrary number to memory just strikes me as silly

  • @onlineuser4506
    @onlineuser4506 Місяць тому +2

    Could the Big bang be an equivalent to a neuron firing within a larger Network? I think we are the universe trying to experience itself through our own personal experience to try to understand what it is.

    • @markperron851
      @markperron851 Місяць тому +1

      The Big Bang imo is the reaction to the implosion of the idea or concept into the material. The forcing of elements through an energetic form would cause one side to implode and materialize while the items outside that form would be rejected or ejected back out from the Origin Point. This would display as a large blast of energy that did not materialize.
      Just my version.

    • @alexgonzo5508
      @alexgonzo5508 Місяць тому +2

      Every 'thing' is a 'think,' and every 'think' is a 'thing.' The universe thinks things, and everything is a thought in the universe. Matter and its various organizations are simply thought forms (qualia) of the universal mind. I also believe that there is probably a similar kind of networking that goes on at the quantum level of reality that somewhat mirrors the cosmic network. The 'thinking' or 'thinging' that occurs at the quantum level is very fast, almost instant, but also very simple. The 'thinking' that takes place at the cosmic scale in the cosmic web is, on the other hand, very slow, taking eons to have just a partial thought, but it is also much more complex than the thinking that goes on at the quantum scale. Perhaps the 'purpose' of our universe is to have a single complete thought, and it is still formulating or developing that single thought today. We humans, along with everything else, are part of this single thought process.

  • @markperron851
    @markperron851 Місяць тому +1

    The structure is an echo from the feedback loop. Russian dolls = a level per doll, but fractal version.Carlos love your stuff.
    I am working on a book that is geared towards younger folks. I think Gamma waves may be 6G in a different way. Grandma Waves that organize the Family. 2 Grandmas, 2 Grandpas, Mom and Dad= 6 G or generations. When you deliver the product you reach the 7 G which lines up with God resting on the 7th day.
    Lots of this is hidden in language. Each letter a concept in the Operating Manual or Om 🕉.

    • @emiliomst
      @emiliomst Місяць тому

      What in the schizo?

  • @oliviergoethals4137
    @oliviergoethals4137 12 днів тому

    Even more... It is the brain of the observer!

  • @wilmeraderbertflorezlopez6991
    @wilmeraderbertflorezlopez6991 17 днів тому

    So lucky we don't live in a giant ...

  • @uncannydeduction
    @uncannydeduction Місяць тому

    Lovely

  • @jakevuckturd1201
    @jakevuckturd1201 Місяць тому

    Azathoth from lovecraft mythos is real life cannon

  • @LuisAldamiz
    @LuisAldamiz Місяць тому +1

    Wouldn't that require faster than light impossible communication speeds? Call me skeptic. Earth/Humanity may be a giant "brain" but at cosmic distances communication is slow or just impossible.

    • @markperron851
      @markperron851 Місяць тому +1

      Not trying to be a wise guy but any idea what the speed of thought is? It doesn't require distance so that is not a factor. If distance isn't in play neither would time. The issue is that the whole thing is outside current constructs so most standard rules or laws aren't in play.
      What it dies do though is suggest that Ancient Hindu writings were pretty much on point regarding this process. We are close to full circle and are seeing more daily.

    • @LuisAldamiz
      @LuisAldamiz Місяць тому +2

      @@markperron851 - The speed of thought is in the best case the speed of light. In fact c is better referred to as the speed of causality and it's the speed of everything, including idle massive bodies, because what you don't move in space, you move in time (hence time dilation, twins' paradox, etc.)
      c is a constant relation between space and time for everything, incl. thought.

    • @markperron851
      @markperron851 Місяць тому

      @LuisAldamiz Luis it's already been shown the speed of light is not a constant so your premise falls apart on that alone. The speed of light is just a limit caused by the observer. Speed is a relative concept. Thought is not dependent on anything outside of itself. If you want to be limited by the speed of light go ahead, but when you put parameters on an infinite field, all you get is the rules inside your mental framework. Light is infinite as is it's reciprocal. They are absolutes on a spectrum that has no midpoint. The limits are in the observer not the observed.

    • @LuisAldamiz
      @LuisAldamiz Місяць тому +1

      @@markperron851 - Who has shown that c is not a constant? You're not saying the truth, sry.

    • @markperron851
      @markperron851 Місяць тому

      @LuisAldamiz The only place the speed of light is constant is in a vacuum. Check into it if you still think I am incorrect. I really don't care enough about anybody opinions to lie about any of this. Please investigate before replying with insults again.

  • @Hecarim420
    @Hecarim420 Місяць тому

    BIG/Coolmuch GODLIKE COMPUTATION is a better description ツ
    ==>
    Brains also compute things but describing Universe as brain is flawed in maaaany not so obvious ways
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • @renroca
    @renroca Місяць тому

    you're negating free will. At least you're trying to. If you claim everyone is not an individual Soul, and instead they're just data points, you make them data point. Pantheism isn't just dumb, it's sociopathic.

  • @tripper_702
    @tripper_702 Місяць тому

    Did intelligent entitie create ai or uneducated entitie create ai in universe is same as ???

  • @mediocrates3416
    @mediocrates3416 Місяць тому

    What is Christ? The universal self in Truth: the historical Jesus is a roman lie. This is obvious, if you seriously look.