❶ Scale-Free Cognition 3:05 Ultimate question of the embodied mind 5:50 The most difficult interview to prepare for 6:55 One of my favorite papers of all time (screenshare) 7:40 The Computational Boundary of a Self 9:25 Defining intelligence (cybernetics) 10:30 Cognitive light cones 16:50 All intelligence is collective intelligence 17:35 Nested selves vs. one integrated self (Not Integrated Information Theory) 21:10 The same dynamics in the brain occur in every tissue of the body 22:50 Why scale "free" cognition? ❷ Stress & Surprise 27:22 Stress = Surprise? Navigating the space... 30:30 Intelligence within a salamander example (homeostatic capability of collective intelligence) 33:35 The scale-free importance of stress 37:30 Stress is an exported error signal 40:45 Stress = your problem becomes everyone's problem (cooperation without altruism) 42:25 Stress has no ownership metadata (gap junctions permit mind meld) ❸ The Morphogenetic Field 49:00 About 99% of the Shannon information in a cell is in the membrane and transmembrane gradient (Bob Gatenby) 52:25 Shannon information doesn't distinguish meaning... 55:53 Cancer cells have the wrong scope of "self" 1:01:17 Manipulating cells via retraining vs micromanaging 1:04:45 "Drugs and words have the same mechanisms of action" -Fabrizio Benedetti 1:07:10 Morphogenetic field of signals coordinating cell behavior, bioelectricity special layer (screenshare) 1:11:13 Harold Saxton Burr predicted this 100 years ago! 1:14:50 Connections to Zen Buddhism 1:18:18 Find more of Levin's work
52:36 “Expanding horizon enables shannon information to acquire meaning Because data becomes casually linked to distant and past experiences and acquires implications for future expectations” - Chris Fields
Michael Levin is one of those real earth shakers in my mind. The ideas he is formalizing within fairly rigorous scientific frameworks have been floating around different cultural spheres for some time, so seeing some larger scale traction, and real rigor being applied to those ideas is quite inspiring to me.
Yes, Dr. Levin is doing incredibly meaningful work. I'm g oing to be very surprised if he's not an eventual Nobel Prize winner. He just seems headed that way to me.
Dr. Levin does much more than "repeat old experiments." The earlier work was wonderful - I certainly don't mean to imply otherwise. But Dr. Levin is taking into the real of actually achievements (well, that's what I am expecting will happen, anyway). You're certainly entitled to have your opinion about the work - it's every bit as valid as mine. But I think the man who first works out how to let a child who loses an arm in a tragic accident grow a new one will absolutely deserve a Nobel prize. The amount of suffering his total success could remove from the world is staggering.
1:05:00 "Drugs and words have the same mechanism of action." Thank you Michael Levin! Everyone who has felt like giving up on HOW will be enriched by this ideas.
I learn so much every time I listen to him. Such a treat. Him talking about how the cells rebuilding the limb, (larger scale structure) do not know that they are building it, they're only reacting to a state of stress. Makes me wonder if we are a part of something similar. Like our instincts, drives, stresses, if they are a driver for some bigger process, much bigger than us that we can't fathom. Fun to ponder..
Micheal Levin is one of the greatest minds of our time, such humility and so well spoken... to be his student would be such an honor... of which I am through his talks/interviews anyhow
@@konosmgrwell it’s related to Henri Bergson’s work on consciousness and memory which was done 100 years ago but what Ben is doing here is still new. He’s integrating philosophical notions of intelligence into scientifically testable hypotheses and producing results that define the specific relationality between disparate systems of intelligence. The philosophy may not be new but his application and pairing with biological, computational, and physical models certainly is.
I've not seen an iota of originality in his work as its all old metaphysical rehash. Thus he'll never make the transition from philosophy to science with it, although he might have fun trying to merge the two ( becoming meaningless )
@@cameroncameron2826 Border between matter/biology/mind is very fuzzy indeed. Spirituality just adds up as a the recovery of wholeness that humans have lost since industrial so-called revolution.
@@tixch2000 Yes as a person trained in cognitive neuroscience and phenomenology i'd be aware. But theres so much metaphysics of essentialism today that we are no longer talking sense collectively. I like his videos but they are all a bit shaky and dubious conceptually as reaching out into the unknown just tends to force someone to either go left along a paradox ( in manner of speaking ) or right. Once thats happened its a LaLa Land that its not ethical to deal with by metaphysics because that would only increase the distance of astral travel la la . Hence in these abstractions Levin really ought to have the sense to offer a phenomenological hypothesis of the senses of these places.
@@cameroncameron2826 Somehow agree. Levine's work is undoubtedly amazing. Going beyond our limited mind is a risky road that has no end and we are prone to get lost (in paradoxes) on the way anyway. However, the fact that science is now reaching a point where it is getting hard to test (especially physics) it is very positive that it starts again to ask more profound questions about the whole game of life, consciousness, our place in the universe and so on. And this is a healthy path I believe.
@@tixch2000 Without being sceptical of that (distancing from conclusion A / B or C ) matters are nevertheless ruled a bit by the empirical that has revealed out lack of progress & why it lacked. We do know certainly that with questions surrounding what the purpose of human life & what is the cosmos, there were perpetual problems of measurement. Secondly - now the JWT is strongly suggesting everything we thought we knew concerning the cosmos seems to be wrong, that seems to indicate that the eyes of JWT observed that cosmological science' was actually metaphysics already. If that were not the case then there would not be a large number of hypothesis that are now being found to be invalid. So with it standing to reason that zero was correct concerning any of these sciences surely this shows us all that no form of measurement had been founded, ( meaning small clues / reason to proceed ) nor did exist in human parlance's in order to justify why the ideas implemented in the first instance. Not ' A Problem' as such given the human race agreed to agree to be scientific & it must start somewhere & if NOTHING was available it has to start anyway - thats OK. Did it end up 'starting' with science - NO - not at all. We see now that it started like someone with NIL knowledge of a car engine opening up the bonnet after a breakdown & stating '' i know how to repair this''. Then closes bonnet with no idea and causes trillions to be spent accordingly Thus empty hypothesis were acted upon already & the science we'd been assured that HAD NOT happened. Now ? - again discussing it in order to explain where to go from here I.E where current 'A' to 'B' directions in scientific research should come from. People are saying lets change to Metaphysics = - 'Change to it as if its not been done? Previously there were labs / costs / and this was supposed to create reasons to investigate the science to use. And most perceive this as a kind of 1% proper real science clue is enough to justify / power on 99% extrapolation ( and thats fine too ) But actually the ENTIRE IDEA with both the meaning of life & the cosmos was metaphysical already with NO 1% nucleus. Thus obviously this needs bearing in mind before embarking on a 'never before' adventure that is in fact the same as before ? Obviously cosmology & the like of existential phenomenology sciences tried to obtain something tangible to work with, rendering the idea's per case around what is life / what is the cosmos. They tried to give each inquiry indubitable FACT to define science as science not just metaphysics - well didn't they ? Where has the certainty about that gone ? With calls to go off without evidence we cannot even rely on that. But anyway a whole new direction right ? I'm only trying to understand how the old is the new here & furthermore why would persons like Levin have the right to re-model ancient mysticism ? Because he can and theres no copyrights!
Wrong theres no measurement possible and nothing tangible as this is just metaphysics and computer modelling a hypothesis. Its not even 'fresh' its very OLD metaphysics.
It's always good to hear other people discussing Michael and his teams work, the way he makes sure that he acknowledges others in his field. Thank you both for a great conversation. Peace
It seems to me that the collective rate of evolution of individual consciousness is evolving rapidly in our world. The very baseline of humanity is incrementally becoming more and more mortally aligned with something that can only be described as "all". The next few decades are going to be radically bright.
34 min Stress as the state of just being. Understanding the state of just being is what science has missed. Great insight...would love to expand more on how things work and the emergence of new systems manifests from the older systems just being in harmony...
Theres nothing groundbreaking about the metaphysics he has employed in fact its ancient. but he'll probably get away with it just due to the computer modelling of it. Theres no rigor as none of this can be more than a hypothesis.
From the paper: "A dog has much more temporal memory, some forward prediction ability, and a degree of spatial concern. However, it is likely impossible for a dog’s cognitive apparatus to operate with notions about what is going to happen next month or in the adjacent town." The imprint that evolution has left on a dog's sense of time (and indeed, most mammals especially those with longer noses) circumvents much of the need for memory, since cause/effect are encoded into what the dog smells. The anatomy of their nose allows their olfactory nerves (the oldest of the cranial nerves) to roughly sort the molecules by particle size. A dog that is skilled at using their nose will snort and otherwise use the mechanics of the air that it's sampling to alter the composition of scents. This would allow a dog to modulate patterns of olfactory activation to extract more information and, perhaps to some extent, the sequences in which scents were laid down. This far into our "advanced" stage of evolution -- or perhaps into the terminal stage of evolution -- humans confidently think that we are the only ones who can understand time and cause/effect... but can't dogs, mammals and other animals predict change in season? In fact, wouldn't quite a few things about the world be so obvious to animals that cognition to predict these things wouldn't need to be so deep? If you could smell the hoarfrost underfoot, would you need a calendar or even the stars to know how much time you needed to prepare for winter? If the full moon so dramatically changes the outcome and difficulty of a wolf pack's hunting, would it care to know how hungry it will be at night?
Interesting ideas. It's quite interesting how many people treated me like garbage when all I see on youtube now is similar people developing similar ideas. I guess I never published or collaborated with anyone, but that's because anyone who barely understood what I was writing (e.g. academics with ... degrees?), ignorantly programmed other people to assume I was crazy. So I was alienated. I never got any feedback on anything and I've been humiliated my whole life.
Of course my writing wasn't great and almost nothing is truly novel. But yeh, this guy works with dozens of other people on his own ideas every day for work, whereas I struggle to find a single person to discuss things with who won't flee the conversation -- leaving me more alienated than I was before. Do you or your guest or any of these youtubers know how that feels?
@@peterjohnstoltzman no, that’s an illustration from Chrono Cross, the sequel to Chrono Trigger. The first game is a time traveling RPG and the second involves resolving the resulting multiverse paradox. They’re both great games, but most people have only played the first one. It’s a bit hard to explain, but the final boss from the first one (lavos) could be a metaphor for AI since the game’s dialogue implies that it results from the culmination of human culture and technology which it then renders meaningless (a nihilist apocalypse). Anyways, the games are a bit deeper than it seems on the surface.
@@Carlos.Explains I agree. And right on the heels of the Donald Hoffman interview. It would be cool if you gave Michael and Donald a couple weeks to explore one another's work and then host an informal chat. Esp if you prepare a couple topics or questions of your own and maybe preselect a couple questions from your viewers.
Means let go of the scale to understand it. We perceive the scale difference to interplay with each other, however once you see the scale you start to understand the way to move through it and understand it is all the same. This guy gets it!
This video was a rare treat offered up by the YT algorithm. I wasn't quite sure what to make of the topic or your channel overall, but I'm glad a ran a few cursory searches and took a chance watching the interview. The insight regarding cancer cells vs their relation to the rest of the body as an example of changing perspective was profound, as was the idea of bringing them back into the fold so to speak. I certainly hope to see another video with Dr. Levin in the future as well as some of the collaborators mentioned throughout the video to dive further into these fascinating subjects. Until then, I'll be sure to comb through your past interviews.
Could a trauma use thought to cause a cell to break away from its collective sense of self and focus totally on one idea such as a disease thereby just multiplying the belief of that disease thereby cutting its self off from its own body and its systems
It was cool that you focused on Levin's work on the self. I haven't seen as much discussion around those topics. Very interesting conversation. I'd be interested to hear more from him about how information theory can be applied (usefully or not usefully) to complex biological systems.
Thanks S.G.! My plan was to use the paper as a guiding outline to touch on a bunch of his work. We spent more time on it, and specifically the stress component, than I intended. But since it's not generally covered in his other interviews, hopefully it's useful to folks. :)
One of my toy computer sims had swarms of random walkers, but also made to clone each other towards a gradient, while taking the average gradient vector of all members of a swarm, to pull a parent particle around the 2d gradient terrain. It is just like a chariot with a team of horses, but the horses are imbued with random walk to some degree, which keeps them far enough apart to have a different point of view, and attraction to a positive or negative gradient center, attracted to peaks of a mountain range or a low points in a valley via relative comparison or slope. I dropped several teams of these chariots with horses into the terrain, and it gives you a shared knowledge advantage, all the walkers are averaged to decide where to pull the chariot and perhaps how hard to accelerate it if you like spirals, lol. It’s similar to the Monte Carlo approach, And wasn’t my idea, but I toyed with it quite a bit. Your point about integrating different points of view is valid to a degree. There’s always the opposite case where everyone agrees, but they’re all wrong like popular opinion, or in the case of one-mindedness where going right for the goal, even as a swarm, sometimes isn’t the right answer, like a flock of birds getting sucked into an aircraft engine all at once, or like the monkey with a hand stuck in the jar, for such a system to evolve any further, there needs to be something that spills over, or alarms, when the greedy behavior terminates in a repeatable dead end. I will try to figure out how to avoid the latter, So far, the only option seems to be to randomize what it’s stuck on, shake it up, so a new local universe gets a chance to develop in it’s place. Each
All is one. One is all. Scale is relative, only to the scale of the consciousness is reality perceived. Elegant, and something I think we’ve always known, but can’t express.
I just watched the first part but yeah the idea is totally sound. I've been thinking a lot about our senses. Our senses detect echoes which is how we locate things in time and space with ourselves as an origin point. Cool shit, glad to see people talking about it.
Well finding this channel just now has been quite a treat. Definitely will be following Michael and you from this point onward. Thanks for the fascinating interview!
I'm only 28 minutes in so far, and this fascinating conversation is already expanding my concept of cognition. When Michael Levin mentions cognitive systems spread out so widely on the scale of time and/or space that we may not initially recognize them as such, it immediately made me think of intelligence on a planetary, solar, galactic or even universal scale. Of course, the next step from there is expanding the scale out to infinity which I imagine would probably exceed the boundary of individual selves or things and lead us straight to a non-dualistic singularity. But I'm getting ahead of myself... Time to get back to the interview! Update: Okay, finished. The stress and surprise and morphogenetic field discussion and Zen reference towards the end definitely piqued my interest. Looking forward to more!
There’s some thinking here that triggered the same excitement I felt reading a book by Manuel DeLanda called ‘a thousand years of non linear history’ - I can’t recommend that book enough.
The Zimbabwean philosophy that Nelson Mandela made famous, Ubuntu, posits, "I am what I am because of what we all are," and it is consilient knowledge. I love this so much. So beautiful. Also, no one else understands this, I have to remember.
The scaling up of capability by memory erasure from docking cells sharing an “erase” or inhibitor on memory, wow. You are deep. Reminds me of the historical significance of zero in the number system; it’s not any particular dynamic, it’s the non-existent thing or boundary. Erasing memory erases the boundaries of the dynamic that was there before. In some sense this is stunningly simple and elegant,. Now I am starting to hunt for other occurrences of this “wiping memory” in other contexts. The nonlinear impulse might just have found its useful opposite, like it’s zero.
Thank you for this interview. I too am a huge fan of Mike L. following an initial exposure through Kurt J's interview with the bearded genius. When he publishes the summation of his work and gets nominated for a noble prize I am definitely going to vote for him as many times as I can (for free). Unfortunately, as an Italian American, I don't have much of a background in science either academically or working as a physicist. I just know he's right about all of it because I have sort of a sick sense about these things. Trust me. signed, Bob "the genius" DiPalermo
Awareness of awareness, to focus without a voice for a sustained period. You won't understand being if you have to resort to mental effort and its impressive pictures
I like the idea of cognitive lightcones because it gives us a way to assign responsibility and/or intention to a certain predefined organism over spatial and temporal scales, but it does seem a bit arbitrary. The definition of what constitutes a goal can vary widely. For instance, does a plant's growth towards light count as pursuing a goal in the same way a human planning their career does? Quantifying the spatial and temporal scope of an organism's goals involves interpretation and might not capture the full range of its capacities or intentions. For example, we might underestimate the cognitive abilities of animals due to a lack of understanding of their communication methods. Also, cognitive light cones can grow or shrink depending on the state of development of the organism in question. Also, the concept doesn't fully account for the interdependent nature of ecosystems, where the actions of one organism impact the goals and survival of another. A concept which is less dependent on the idea of a "here and now" would be more effective at capturing these shortcomings. perhaps something like "liquid lightcones" where the dynamic and adaptive nature of cognitive processes in biological organisms and their interactions within ecosystems are taken into account? and maybe the principle of superposition and entanglement could be useful? A Liquid Lightcone that exists in multiple states simultaneously. I like Michael levin's research, but his rate of speech and confidence level have always been a bit suspicious to me.
The Mother.1981. A student of her wrote "The Mind of the Cells". On her endeavour to instruct cells to no longer die. With huge amounts of love.Not only for herself, but for humanity. Goal driven...what is the goal? We decide it. It has been decided, for us. Immortality. Freedom. Love. Joy. Light. Power.
@@Carlos.Explains Incredible! Thanks so much, diving into round 2 now. Also see a TON of other incredible content on your channel, so I'm subbed now. I would love to hear his thoughts about how he thinks the biological principles he's discovered could be applied to the creation of AGI, if you're willing to entertain that theme of discussion for your next interview (if it's not already talked about in your second one, checking that out now).
There are two relationships in that way. 1 - Database appropriate human knowledge 2 - Probe its Heuristics Resultant is what the A.I. sites thus respond with.
24:34 Seems like he agrees with me. The way I describe this situation is this: I compare it to the movie Ford V Ferrari, with Henri Ford commemorated in it. When the character played by Christian Bale takes him for a ride in the current time's fastest car, he said "I wish my father was here to see where we are at today!". "This is evolution, baybeh!" Every species is a bullet in time that lasts forever for as long as it procreates. They're the hero of their own story and they make their ancestors proud. At some point, we share ancestors with so many species, even arthropods. We all have the symmetry gene, for example.
He hasn't said anything original during these metaphysical ramblings hes repeat the old old old. The caveat emptor resonants throughout his own words with respect to how philosophical it all is and the way he'll work to covert that.
Thanks Carlos and Mike. Fascinating discussion and great insights. 59.38 I can’t help seeing this scale to society and mass shooters being incredibly isolated from the collective (like cancer cells in society).
Im thinking about humans and your statement , about giving up your identity and merging with the collective for higher powers. Whatever they are. I think there’s an awakening that’s going on in the world and it’s been going on for some time, but it seems to be accelerating with access to information regarding psychedelics and spirituality and the ancient indigenous wisdom of our ancestors. I totally agree with the systems and diverse intelligence, and I think my journeys inside of myself, I’ve seen everything you described. It is so beautiful. I see it more of a kingdom and many kingdoms surrounding it and then other -communities , including alien looking x infinity possibly. I think everyone set up differently. I would imagine we all have our particular conditioned metaphors inside of us they have their appropriate meanings. Meaning, each person has different visions of what they experience inside themselves I think We can clearly see that what’s inside of ourselves is projected out and we have a lot of conflict within ourselves and that’s why there’s increasing crime, prisons , wars strife and Division and rising mental illness. Actually, the country with the highest rise of mental illness and suicide is in America. We are the leader in technology, and we are the canary in the coal mine at the same time. The spiritual awakening of knowing that we are much more than we think in this current materialistic society, and if we can find new identities That are more transformative as we are , and the universe is. A sense that we are all connected and that there before you I go. Also, nature is us, and we’re not separate from nature. If enough, people awaken, and we can share in common spiritual identity. In a Psychedelic study on the experience , it was said that 95% of the people or more felt they had experienced ultimate reality or God energy. When they looked closer at the study and the shared characteristics of the two, they were the same. If enough people realize that there is a God or an ultimate reality, way beyond what they know right now we could possibly come to a new collective intelligent understanding of ourselves, and then who knows from there.
One of the biggest differentials in the field of technology applications is finding a common descriptor for “intelligence” systems that can be used in all fields. Michael Levins light cones design more fleshed out I think is capable of producing something similar to angle and arc notation for a universal geometry. It will be fascinating to see how all of this develops, especially in light of AGI.
In general, I've generalized intelligence as a measure of how many concepts or ideas you can hold in your mind at the same time. When complex concepts or novel ideas come up in conversation, it's only with the smartest people that really understand or add to the conversation. The ability to comprehend all of the elements involved to approach the topic are necessary to crystallize into the deeper or novel ideas. I don't simply mean knowing lot of facts, but holding all of the facts/ideas needed ones mind at the same time to see the new ones.
I’ve only gotten part way through but one of the immediate questions that came up is what is the supposed “I” or “us” that is not part of the networks that make the feeling and sensing body mind
If our individual parts have agendas, how does that comport with the idea that we're a collective intelligence? Should the emergent construct break apart? When we cut pieces of our brain, it still functions quite normally.
The individual agendas are in unison because of their entanglement with one-another. That was talked about here, how the bioelectric coupling of all the cells in a network results in a kind of dissolution of individual identity.
I think our cells aren't there to help us or work against us. The reason most of them help us is because their existence could only come about through helping the host reproduce. That's why the majority of our cells arent cancerous. And they have made us very smart too. But they don't share our goals, but they created our goals nevertheless
I made it to 17 minutes and I'm taking a pause. I might go back a bit because I caught myself on a tangent about the physical eyeball having three qualities, filtering, focusing and capturing light, and then the faculty of sight having the qualities of attention, attachment and memory, with attachment being of either negative, positive or neutral polarity, these then provocative of movement away or towards, or not, the goal being to acquire this, avoid that, or ignore it.
Want to collaborate? I’ve been thinking about GR and the omni dimensional N sphere lattice model for 30 years. Spatial lattice deformation models do a perfect job weaving together parallel world history sheets and the transcendent spaces form a perfect bulk space to enable phenomenon like entanglement and a framework for quantized spacetime to squeeze and pinch in on itself, effectively making spacetime density gradients (geodesics). I’m not a quack. I’ve done my homework. I have drawing and modeling skills and love philosophy and the arts. I’ve watched your content and your light cone models naturally play with my vision. Things get damn near spooky when you wrestle with infinite abstraction by way of hyper geometry. But it seems to be what nature gives us. I’ve said my prayers and eaten my wheaties, but seriously, an observer based generative model of quantum gravity is falling into our lap. None too soon based on the headlines. Let me know.
@@danscieszinski4120 sounds interesting! Likely beyond my present understanding... do you have a website or papers you can share? And to clarify, the light cone model is Mike's work!
@@Carlos.Explains haha! Realized that after I fell out of my stupor of fascination. I’m working on a visual narrative for my extension of GR. However the more I look around these media spaces the more I feel like we do have the pieces all uncovered in different competencies of diagram. We’re all basically trying to graph infinity, which has been a quest for as long as mathematicians realized they were geometers in disguise 😎🤙if my ideas get any traction maybe we’ll meet some day. ✌️
Around 1:12:00, there's a discussion of the idea that man is a machine. La Mettrie was extending the earlier idea of Descartes that animals are machines. That idea may have been inspired by mechanical automata, toys which were designed to move like living things and were collected by wealthy Europeans in the early modern era in "cabinets of curiosities". Descartes likely saw these in Prague Castle (the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperors collected them), which he entered after the Battle of White Mountain. A classic history book about this is Frances Yates's 1972 work "The Rosicrucian Enlightenment".
22min Very correctly stated that the body as a whole is a system and within that system we have many systems going upto the bacteria in the gut . The brain is just another system. The soul or the life atom is the one that understands and has cognition. This is what seperates from the body when we call it not as a human being but a human body. That being is permanent and would love to share the structural ontology and it's functioning of the invisible life atom😊
As much as I believe soul exists, the problem science has with that conception is that you can't study it in the lab. Would need to develop some type of instrumentation that can make those ultra high frequency, higher dimensional energies visible or measurable in some way for science to take it seriously. But then you have the fundamental philosophic problem of the chicken or the egg. How would you develop a device with those capabilities if you dont even believe it exists? Even the scientists that believe in a soul dont think its a scientific pursuit.
@@nicholassauer2612 Science is something that needs to be redefined. Instead of making a machine that will see the soul we can look at the people dying and understand there is something that disconnects with the body that gives life. Any physical machine will be made of physical atoms only and that is not a prerequisite to validate the existence of soul . If this concept is clear then that is the next good step for Science. If you would like to engage in a dialogue that will help I can set apart some time 🙏🙏
Hi Michael, you are right there are many more roads that lead to Rome. The Simulation Hypothesis assumes that consciousness can only be created by computation and thus excludes all other possibilities that are uncomputable. The Anti-Simulation Hypothesis states that since there may be infinitely many other possibilities for consciousness to emerge, the probability of living in a simulation is close to zero.
think about the complexity thresholds and the "flavor's of randomness" that will happen when chaos theory is fully integrated into mathematics and physics as well. physics will give quite a good domain where this new type of semi deterministic probability can occur, since it has issues with rpobability aspects like renormilization and such...
14.2 The cognitive capacity of human being is to be used to understand the coexistence of the formless the invisible and the form of all that exists...
Carlos’ rambling and banal compliments are a bit tedious, but I’m still happy to see that Michael Levin is graciously doing so many of these sorts of interviews given the importance of the ground-breaking work he and his team are doing.
Thanks for the feedback Dan. I wasn't my sharpest this day, cat had my tongue all interview. I have a long way to go as an interviewer, and hope to trim the fat in future conversations.
39 min The equilibrium state is when all the cells are all content and that is when there is festivity... And that leads to manifestation and emergence of the new more complicated system. This could be a better way of explaining this whole concept can be more palatable and plausible 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Change the system as the ultimate lesson here…awesome. Re-set incentives, and individuals will voluntarily shift behaviors. I wonder what is the molecular biological analogy for the power brokers in a system who preserve status quo at all costs.
All Is One. One Is All. Fifteen minutes in and I am reminded of an old idea that the higher the degree of intelligence someone posesses the higher the level of empathy they possess. To the point that a truly intelligent/potentiated individual has the ability to see reality through perspectives other than their own. With the way Everything is connected it would make perfect sense that humans moving up in the energy grid would correlate with us raising our ability to connect with eachother. With Schumann resonances, solar flares, and geo magnetic/techtonic activity up the wazoo maybe Mother Earth just needs someone to talk to! Interconnectedness is the way.
Cognition appears to be fundamental to living things, and it is likely electrically mediated. Likewise, morphologic changes are associated with bioelectrical changes. Can higher level organism aware of the cognitive triggers for morphological change cognitively self-induce desired morphological changes? Can I change the way I look by my thoughts coupled with feelings?(eg. placebo effect) Or do cognitive processes (coupled with feelings) only effect behavior?
14:16 - Well, not attainable by you. But some goals are not and will never be obtainable by any one person within a single lifetime; that automatically brings into existence "progress goals," some of which can be realistically attained by a single person. Even just inspiring others to care about such a goal is progress toward it. I absolutely think we should be in the early thinking steps of leaving the planet, even though we might not actually try to do it for thousands of years.
I wonder if Dr. Levin has done any research into the immune system, whether other superorganisms suffer from cancer-like dysfunctions at the superorganism level, and how they deal with it.
"there is a kinda of scale-up process by which these competent subunits. One thing we have to understand is that we are made up of very competent subunits."
❶ Scale-Free Cognition
3:05 Ultimate question of the embodied mind
5:50 The most difficult interview to prepare for
6:55 One of my favorite papers of all time (screenshare)
7:40 The Computational Boundary of a Self
9:25 Defining intelligence (cybernetics)
10:30 Cognitive light cones
16:50 All intelligence is collective intelligence
17:35 Nested selves vs. one integrated self (Not Integrated Information Theory)
21:10 The same dynamics in the brain occur in every tissue of the body
22:50 Why scale "free" cognition?
❷ Stress & Surprise
27:22 Stress = Surprise? Navigating the space...
30:30 Intelligence within a salamander example (homeostatic capability of collective intelligence)
33:35 The scale-free importance of stress
37:30 Stress is an exported error signal
40:45 Stress = your problem becomes everyone's problem (cooperation without altruism)
42:25 Stress has no ownership metadata (gap junctions permit mind meld)
❸ The Morphogenetic Field
49:00 About 99% of the Shannon information in a cell is in the membrane and transmembrane gradient (Bob Gatenby)
52:25 Shannon information doesn't distinguish meaning...
55:53 Cancer cells have the wrong scope of "self"
1:01:17 Manipulating cells via retraining vs micromanaging
1:04:45 "Drugs and words have the same mechanisms of action" -Fabrizio Benedetti
1:07:10 Morphogenetic field of signals coordinating cell behavior, bioelectricity special layer (screenshare)
1:11:13 Harold Saxton Burr predicted this 100 years ago!
1:14:50 Connections to Zen Buddhism
1:18:18 Find more of Levin's work
Stellar timestamping, thank you
ua-cam.com/video/maHMWLXhkDE/v-deo.html
52:36 “Expanding horizon enables shannon information to acquire meaning
Because data becomes casually linked to distant and past experiences and acquires implications for future expectations” - Chris Fields
Above that statement is the invisible thing which remembers What happened, not just how it felt chemically through the system. Wow.
Levin is a gift to humanity. Thx.
Michael Levin is one of those real earth shakers in my mind. The ideas he is formalizing within fairly rigorous scientific frameworks have been floating around different cultural spheres for some time, so seeing some larger scale traction, and real rigor being applied to those ideas is quite inspiring to me.
Agreed, Tanner! Expecting to have him on soon for round 2!
Its metaphysics supported by computer modelling which hasn't got 'rigor' in the slightest beyond hypothesis levels = none.
Yes, Dr. Levin is doing incredibly meaningful work. I'm g oing to be very surprised if he's not an eventual Nobel Prize winner. He just seems headed that way to me.
@@KipIngram Why should such prizes be awarded for repeating old metaphysics & spirituality such as mr levin does ?
Dr. Levin does much more than "repeat old experiments." The earlier work was wonderful - I certainly don't mean to imply otherwise. But Dr. Levin is taking into the real of actually achievements (well, that's what I am expecting will happen, anyway). You're certainly entitled to have your opinion about the work - it's every bit as valid as mine. But I think the man who first works out how to let a child who loses an arm in a tragic accident grow a new one will absolutely deserve a Nobel prize. The amount of suffering his total success could remove from the world is staggering.
1:05:00 "Drugs and words have the same mechanism of action." Thank you Michael Levin! Everyone who has felt like giving up on HOW will be enriched by this ideas.
I learn so much every time I listen to him. Such a treat.
Him talking about how the cells rebuilding the limb, (larger scale structure) do not know that they are building it, they're only reacting to a state of stress. Makes me wonder if we are a part of something similar. Like our instincts, drives, stresses, if they are a driver for some bigger process, much bigger than us that we can't fathom. Fun to ponder..
😮
We exist to serve God
It's often called the human enterprise
@@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269how confident are you in that?
@@marcomoreno6748 Very confident
Micheal Levin is one of the greatest minds of our time, such humility and so well spoken... to be his student would be such an honor... of which I am through his talks/interviews anyhow
His ‘consciousness cone’ is an idea that’s at least 40 years old that he is selling as his own..
@@alvinashagarwal3939 Do you know who spearheaded it?
@@konosmgrwell it’s related to Henri Bergson’s work on consciousness and memory which was done 100 years ago but what Ben is doing here is still new. He’s integrating philosophical notions of intelligence into scientifically testable hypotheses and producing results that define the specific relationality between disparate systems of intelligence. The philosophy may not be new but his application and pairing with biological, computational, and physical models certainly is.
I've not seen an iota of originality in his work as its all old metaphysical rehash. Thus he'll never make the transition from philosophy to science with it, although he might have fun trying to merge the two ( becoming meaningless )
@@alvinashagarwal3939 Correct
What a treat for a Saturday! Move over other videos, new Levin stuff is on. Thanks again Carlos!
Thanks P! Hope you enjoyed it. =)
Love the Bodhisattva link. That makes the whole pitch coherent and meaningful for us humans. Thank you for this interview.
Yes this work is just spirituality isn't it.
@@cameroncameron2826 Border between matter/biology/mind is very fuzzy indeed. Spirituality just adds up as a the recovery of wholeness that humans have lost since industrial so-called revolution.
@@tixch2000 Yes as a person trained in cognitive neuroscience and phenomenology i'd be aware. But theres so much metaphysics of essentialism today that we are no longer talking sense collectively. I like his videos but they are all a bit shaky and dubious conceptually as reaching out into the unknown just tends to force someone to either go left along a paradox ( in manner of speaking ) or right. Once thats happened its a LaLa Land that its not ethical to deal with by metaphysics because that would only increase the distance of astral travel la la . Hence in these abstractions Levin really ought to have the sense to offer a phenomenological hypothesis of the senses of these places.
@@cameroncameron2826 Somehow agree. Levine's work is undoubtedly amazing. Going beyond our limited mind is a risky road that has no end and we are prone to get lost (in paradoxes) on the way anyway. However, the fact that science is now reaching a point where it is getting hard to test (especially physics) it is very positive that it starts again to ask more profound questions about the whole game of life, consciousness, our place in the universe and so on. And this is a healthy path I believe.
@@tixch2000 Without being sceptical of that (distancing from conclusion A / B or C ) matters are nevertheless ruled a bit by the empirical that has revealed out lack of progress & why it lacked. We do know certainly that with questions surrounding what the purpose of human life & what is the cosmos, there were perpetual problems of measurement. Secondly - now the JWT is strongly suggesting everything we thought we knew concerning the cosmos seems to be wrong, that seems to indicate that the eyes of JWT observed that cosmological science' was actually metaphysics already. If that were not the case then there would not be a large number of hypothesis that are now being found to be invalid. So with it standing to reason that zero was correct concerning any of these sciences surely this shows us all that no form of measurement had been founded, ( meaning small clues / reason to proceed ) nor did exist in human parlance's in order to justify why the ideas implemented in the first instance. Not ' A Problem' as such given the human race agreed to agree to be scientific & it must start somewhere & if NOTHING was available it has to start anyway - thats OK. Did it end up 'starting' with science - NO - not at all. We see now that it started like someone with NIL knowledge of a car engine opening up the bonnet after a breakdown & stating '' i know how to repair this''. Then closes bonnet with no idea and causes trillions to be spent accordingly Thus empty hypothesis were acted upon already & the science we'd been assured that HAD NOT happened. Now ? - again discussing it in order to explain where to go from here I.E where current 'A' to 'B' directions in scientific research should come from. People are saying lets change to Metaphysics = - 'Change to it as if its not been done? Previously there were labs / costs / and this was supposed to create reasons to investigate the science to use. And most perceive this as a kind of 1% proper real science clue is enough to justify / power on 99% extrapolation ( and thats fine too ) But actually the ENTIRE IDEA with both the meaning of life & the cosmos was metaphysical already with NO 1% nucleus. Thus obviously this needs bearing in mind before embarking on a 'never before' adventure that is in fact the same as before ? Obviously cosmology & the like of existential phenomenology sciences tried to obtain something tangible to work with, rendering the idea's per case around what is life / what is the cosmos. They tried to give each inquiry indubitable FACT to define science as science not just metaphysics - well didn't they ? Where has the certainty about that gone ? With calls to go off without evidence we cannot even rely on that. But anyway a whole new direction right ?
I'm only trying to understand how the old is the new here & furthermore why would persons like Levin have the right to re-model ancient mysticism ?
Because he can and theres no copyrights!
Very refreshing to see a cognitive model based on competence and goals, tangible metrics that can be measured and validated.
Wrong theres no measurement possible and nothing tangible as this is just metaphysics and computer modelling a hypothesis. Its not even 'fresh' its very OLD metaphysics.
Isn’t this just the Akasha principle rebranded ?
It's always good to hear other people discussing Michael and his teams work, the way he makes sure that he acknowledges others in his field. Thank you both for a great conversation. Peace
Thanks William!
It seems to me that the collective rate of evolution of individual consciousness is evolving rapidly in our world. The very baseline of humanity is incrementally becoming more and more mortally aligned with something that can only be described as "all". The next few decades are going to be radically bright.
34 min Stress as the state of just being. Understanding the state of just being is what science has missed. Great insight...would love to expand more on how things work and the emergence of new systems manifests from the older systems just being in harmony...
He should be getting a Nobel. Outstanding work. Thank you for all you do Michael
For metaphysics like this ? = nonsense.
Just found your channel and instantly subscribed! Dr. Levin’s work is some of the most groundbreaking stuff I’ve ever read
Thanks Srikar! Agreed, Levin is a boss.
I personally like his work on the planarium worms. truly eye opening. jaw dropping.
Theres nothing groundbreaking about the metaphysics he has employed in fact its ancient. but he'll probably get away with it just due to the computer modelling of it.
Theres no rigor as none of this can be more than a hypothesis.
the public's mind... 🙂 thank you for posting, and giving your time. excellent talk.
Just a year ago I didn't even know I had a cognitive light cone but I find it expands with use, Much thanks to Michel Levin.
What a fascinating topic. It’s hard to find Levins content other than his usual presentations, so I’m glad i came across your interview.
You liked it THAT much ?
@@cameroncameron2826 yes 😊
47min Every cell is complete in itself and a part of the bigger system and that is the existential reality.... That simple😊😊 Amazing observation
Awesome! I'd love to find communities of people interested in these types of discussions.
Hi
@IntrinsicMinds yt channel has these types of discussions as of late. This is golden for bridging many gaps
🤯
This is exactly the updates to our field that I needed this week.
Dr. Michael Levin, you are my hero.
the everyone who published the metaphysics hes repeating from as far back as 6k years and more are as nothing whatsoever hes saying is original.
From the paper: "A dog has much more temporal memory, some forward prediction ability, and a degree of spatial concern. However, it is likely impossible for a dog’s cognitive apparatus to operate with notions about what is going to happen next month or in the adjacent town."
The imprint that evolution has left on a dog's sense of time (and indeed, most mammals especially those with longer noses) circumvents much of the need for memory, since cause/effect are encoded into what the dog smells. The anatomy of their nose allows their olfactory nerves (the oldest of the cranial nerves) to roughly sort the molecules by particle size. A dog that is skilled at using their nose will snort and otherwise use the mechanics of the air that it's sampling to alter the composition of scents. This would allow a dog to modulate patterns of olfactory activation to extract more information and, perhaps to some extent, the sequences in which scents were laid down.
This far into our "advanced" stage of evolution -- or perhaps into the terminal stage of evolution -- humans confidently think that we are the only ones who can understand time and cause/effect... but can't dogs, mammals and other animals predict change in season? In fact, wouldn't quite a few things about the world be so obvious to animals that cognition to predict these things wouldn't need to be so deep? If you could smell the hoarfrost underfoot, would you need a calendar or even the stars to know how much time you needed to prepare for winter? If the full moon so dramatically changes the outcome and difficulty of a wolf pack's hunting, would it care to know how hungry it will be at night?
Interesting ideas. It's quite interesting how many people treated me like garbage when all I see on youtube now is similar people developing similar ideas. I guess I never published or collaborated with anyone, but that's because anyone who barely understood what I was writing (e.g. academics with ... degrees?), ignorantly programmed other people to assume I was crazy. So I was alienated. I never got any feedback on anything and I've been humiliated my whole life.
Of course my writing wasn't great and almost nothing is truly novel. But yeh, this guy works with dozens of other people on his own ideas every day for work, whereas I struggle to find a single person to discuss things with who won't flee the conversation -- leaving me more alienated than I was before.
Do you or your guest or any of these youtubers know how that feels?
@@DavidConnerCodeaholic it's tough but there is a way. Maybe start a blog and UA-cam and share your ideas. You'll form a community
@@dominicsey3032 Thank you Dominic. Best of luck in your journey as well.
@@peterjohnstoltzman no, that’s an illustration from Chrono Cross, the sequel to Chrono Trigger. The first game is a time traveling RPG and the second involves resolving the resulting multiverse paradox. They’re both great games, but most people have only played the first one.
It’s a bit hard to explain, but the final boss from the first one (lavos) could be a metaphor for AI since the game’s dialogue implies that it results from the culmination of human culture and technology which it then renders meaningless (a nihilist apocalypse). Anyways, the games are a bit deeper than it seems on the surface.
wow, you are suddenly interviewing all of my favorite people
Thanks Lao. Who else should I interview?
@@Carlos.Explains I agree. And right on the heels of the Donald Hoffman interview.
It would be cool if you gave Michael and Donald a couple weeks to explore one another's work and then host an informal chat.
Esp if you prepare a couple topics or questions of your own and maybe preselect a couple questions from your viewers.
Means let go of the scale to understand it. We perceive the scale difference to interplay with each other, however once you see the scale you start to understand the way to move through it and understand it is all the same. This guy gets it!
I would love to hear more, thanks for each of you taking the time
This video was a rare treat offered up by the YT algorithm. I wasn't quite sure what to make of the topic or your channel overall, but I'm glad a ran a few cursory searches and took a chance watching the interview. The insight regarding cancer cells vs their relation to the rest of the body as an example of changing perspective was profound, as was the idea of bringing them back into the fold so to speak.
I certainly hope to see another video with Dr. Levin in the future as well as some of the collaborators mentioned throughout the video to dive further into these fascinating subjects. Until then, I'll be sure to comb through your past interviews.
Thanks Jz!
Could a trauma use thought to cause a cell to break away from its collective sense of self and focus totally on one idea such as a disease thereby just multiplying the belief of that disease thereby cutting its self off from its own body and its systems
Yes his cancer perspective seems right on!!!
It was cool that you focused on Levin's work on the self. I haven't seen as much discussion around those topics.
Very interesting conversation. I'd be interested to hear more from him about how information theory can be applied (usefully or not usefully) to complex biological systems.
Thanks S.G.! My plan was to use the paper as a guiding outline to touch on a bunch of his work. We spent more time on it, and specifically the stress component, than I intended. But since it's not generally covered in his other interviews, hopefully it's useful to folks. :)
Thanks for this video! Michael Levin might be a new favorite person of mine
Wowza! So amazing. I love the simplicity.
One of my toy computer sims had swarms of random walkers, but also made to clone each other towards a gradient, while taking the average gradient vector of all members of a swarm, to pull a parent particle around the 2d gradient terrain.
It is just like a chariot with a team of horses, but the horses are imbued with random walk to some degree, which keeps them far enough apart to have a different point of view, and attraction to a positive or negative gradient center, attracted to peaks of a mountain range or a low points in a valley via relative comparison or slope. I dropped several teams of these chariots with horses into the terrain, and it gives you a shared knowledge advantage, all the walkers are averaged to decide where to pull the chariot and perhaps how hard to accelerate it if you like spirals, lol.
It’s similar to the Monte Carlo approach, And wasn’t my idea, but I toyed with it quite a bit.
Your point about integrating different points of view is valid to a degree. There’s always the opposite case where everyone agrees, but they’re all wrong like popular opinion, or in the case of one-mindedness where going right for the goal, even as a swarm, sometimes isn’t the right answer, like a flock of birds getting sucked into an aircraft engine all at once, or like the monkey with a hand stuck in the jar, for such a system to evolve any further, there needs to be something that spills over, or alarms, when the greedy behavior terminates in a repeatable dead end.
I will try to figure out how to avoid the latter, So far, the only option seems to be to randomize what it’s stuck on, shake it up, so a new local universe gets a chance to develop in it’s place. Each
Thanks Carlos, Thanks Michael! Smart Stuff! Appreciated. D from Scotland.
All is one. One is all. Scale is relative, only to the scale of the consciousness is reality perceived. Elegant, and something I think we’ve always known, but can’t express.
Well expressed, APJ!
The bit about reconseptualizing our moral basis really resonated with me. This is worldview stuff.
stunning conversation. so many insights
What ideas. What explanations. Astounding
Loved this video. Thank you to and Michael Levin.
Thanks Juan! Will have him on again in about a month. 😀
I just watched the first part but yeah the idea is totally sound. I've been thinking a lot about our senses. Our senses detect echoes which is how we locate things in time and space with ourselves as an origin point. Cool shit, glad to see people talking about it.
UA-cam reccomended and I’m glad to find the work.
You should loosen up and practice more interviews.
Well finding this channel just now has been quite a treat. Definitely will be following Michael and you from this point onward. Thanks for the fascinating interview!
Thanks Cragnog!
loving your channel dude, many thanks for putting out this excellent content.
Thank you!
I'm only 28 minutes in so far, and this fascinating conversation is already expanding my concept of cognition. When Michael Levin mentions cognitive systems spread out so widely on the scale of time and/or space that we may not initially recognize them as such, it immediately made me think of intelligence on a planetary, solar, galactic or even universal scale.
Of course, the next step from there is expanding the scale out to infinity which I imagine would probably exceed the boundary of individual selves or things and lead us straight to a non-dualistic singularity. But I'm getting ahead of myself... Time to get back to the interview!
Update: Okay, finished. The stress and surprise and morphogenetic field discussion and Zen reference towards the end definitely piqued my interest. Looking forward to more!
More coming in a few days!
There’s some thinking here that triggered the same excitement I felt reading a book by Manuel DeLanda called ‘a thousand years of non linear history’ - I can’t recommend that book enough.
The Zimbabwean philosophy that Nelson Mandela made famous, Ubuntu, posits, "I am what I am because of what we all are," and it is consilient knowledge. I love this so much. So beautiful. Also, no one else understands this, I have to remember.
The scaling up of capability by memory erasure from docking cells sharing an “erase” or inhibitor on memory, wow. You are deep. Reminds me of the historical significance of zero in the number system; it’s not any particular dynamic, it’s the non-existent thing or boundary. Erasing memory erases the boundaries of the dynamic that was there before. In some sense this is stunningly simple and elegant,. Now I am starting to hunt for other occurrences of this “wiping memory” in other contexts. The nonlinear impulse might just have found its useful opposite, like it’s zero.
Thank you for this interview. I too am a huge fan of Mike L. following an initial exposure through Kurt J's interview with the bearded genius. When he publishes the summation of his work and gets nominated for a noble prize I am definitely going to vote for him as many times as I can (for free). Unfortunately, as an Italian American, I don't have much of a background in science either academically or working as a physicist. I just know he's right about all of it because I have sort of a sick sense about these things. Trust me.
signed,
Bob "the genius" DiPalermo
Yes it definitely just "feels" true.
I didn't know Mr. Beast was running a lab full of scientists. Dude gets so much done in a day. Impressive AF.
Too funny 😊😂😊😂
Thankyou it's automatic
My ex wife use to call me Poindexter when I got my haircut like that...
😂😂😂😂
He doesn't look that much like Mr. Beast.
Awareness of awareness, to focus without a voice for a sustained period. You won't understand being if you have to resort to mental effort and its impressive pictures
Never thought of anthropomorphizing cells before. I like it
gained a new sub! extremely intelligent questions. definitely setting the bar high for us interviewers
Awesome to hear, Max! Thank you, very kind!
Absolutely fascinating!
I like the idea of cognitive lightcones because it gives us a way to assign responsibility and/or intention to a certain predefined organism over spatial and temporal scales, but it does seem a bit arbitrary. The definition of what constitutes a goal can vary widely. For instance, does a plant's growth towards light count as pursuing a goal in the same way a human planning their career does? Quantifying the spatial and temporal scope of an organism's goals involves interpretation and might not capture the full range of its capacities or intentions. For example, we might underestimate the cognitive abilities of animals due to a lack of understanding of their communication methods. Also, cognitive light cones can grow or shrink depending on the state of development of the organism in question. Also, the concept doesn't fully account for the interdependent nature of ecosystems, where the actions of one organism impact the goals and survival of another. A concept which is less dependent on the idea of a "here and now" would be more effective at capturing these shortcomings. perhaps something like "liquid lightcones" where the dynamic and adaptive nature of cognitive processes in biological organisms and their interactions within ecosystems are taken into account? and maybe the principle of superposition and entanglement could be useful? A Liquid Lightcone that exists in multiple states simultaneously. I like Michael levin's research, but his rate of speech and confidence level have always been a bit suspicious to me.
Stumbled from Ross Hatton's spider web sensor to Levin's Cognitive cones.
Great minds.
What is the relationship between Levins cellular cognition and Hameroffs microtubules producing intracellular cognition?
The Mother.1981. A student of her wrote "The Mind of the Cells". On her endeavour to instruct cells to no longer die. With huge amounts of love.Not only for herself, but for humanity. Goal driven...what is the goal? We decide it. It has been decided, for us. Immortality. Freedom. Love. Joy. Light. Power.
lol
Surprisingly original ideas!
Please, more of this guy!
Pity this wasn't longer. Really wanted to hear more, especially about the relationship to AI and AGI. Thanks for sharing!
There’s a round 2 published, and round 3 is coming soon!
@@Carlos.Explains Incredible! Thanks so much, diving into round 2 now. Also see a TON of other incredible content on your channel, so I'm subbed now. I would love to hear his thoughts about how he thinks the biological principles he's discovered could be applied to the creation of AGI, if you're willing to entertain that theme of discussion for your next interview (if it's not already talked about in your second one, checking that out now).
There are two relationships in that way.
1 - Database appropriate human knowledge
2 - Probe its Heuristics
Resultant is what the A.I. sites thus respond with.
24:34 Seems like he agrees with me. The way I describe this situation is this: I compare it to the movie Ford V Ferrari, with Henri Ford commemorated in it. When the character played by Christian Bale takes him for a ride in the current time's fastest car, he said "I wish my father was here to see where we are at today!". "This is evolution, baybeh!"
Every species is a bullet in time that lasts forever for as long as it procreates. They're the hero of their own story and they make their ancestors proud.
At some point, we share ancestors with so many species, even arthropods. We all have the symmetry gene, for example.
This man is blowing my mind with his words
He hasn't said anything original during these metaphysical ramblings hes repeat the old old old. The caveat emptor resonants throughout his own words with respect to how philosophical it all is and the way he'll work to covert that.
such a wonderful interview! Thank you. Ps: I would like to hear him play those bongos y djembe in the corner.
Thanks Laura! I'll see if he can oblige for round 2. 😀
Thanks Carlos and Mike. Fascinating discussion and great insights. 59.38 I can’t help seeing this scale to society and mass shooters being incredibly isolated from the collective (like cancer cells in society).
Thanks John. I agree, that seems like an apt (and of course, tragic) analogy.
New to your channel. Great job for your guidance in unpacking of Mike Levin's work!
Welcome Wayne Wells!
1.13min Being grateful to people and being humble makes the most of your knowledge 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Im thinking about humans and your statement , about giving up your identity and merging with the collective for higher powers. Whatever they are.
I think there’s an awakening that’s going on in the world and it’s been going on for some time, but it seems to be accelerating with access to information regarding psychedelics and spirituality and the ancient indigenous wisdom of our ancestors.
I totally agree with the systems and diverse intelligence, and I think my journeys inside of myself, I’ve seen everything you described. It is so beautiful. I see it more of a kingdom and many kingdoms surrounding it and then other -communities , including alien looking x infinity possibly. I think everyone set up differently. I would imagine we all have our particular conditioned metaphors inside of us they have their appropriate meanings. Meaning, each person has different visions of what they experience inside themselves
I think We can clearly see that what’s inside of ourselves is projected out and we have a lot of conflict within ourselves and that’s why there’s increasing crime, prisons , wars strife and Division and rising mental illness. Actually, the country with the highest rise of mental illness and suicide is in America. We are the leader in technology, and we are the canary in the coal mine at the same time.
The spiritual awakening of knowing that we are much more than we think in this current materialistic society, and if we can find new identities That are more transformative as we are , and the universe is. A sense that we are all connected and that there before you I go. Also, nature is us, and we’re not separate from nature.
If enough, people awaken, and we can share in common spiritual identity. In a Psychedelic study on the experience , it was said that 95% of the people or more felt they had experienced ultimate reality or God energy. When they looked closer at the study and the shared characteristics of the two, they were the same.
If enough people realize that there is a God or an ultimate reality, way beyond what they know right now we could possibly come to a new collective intelligent understanding of ourselves, and then who knows from there.
59min Beautifully explained cancer cells 🙏🙏🙏🙏
This was VERY IMPRESSIVE!! GREAT CONTENT. 👍 ❤
THANKS AL!
Your very very welcome!! ❤
Its just old metaphysics ? nothing is original.
One of the biggest differentials in the field of technology applications is finding a common descriptor for “intelligence” systems that can be used in all fields. Michael Levins light cones design more fleshed out I think is capable of producing something similar to angle and arc notation for a universal geometry. It will be fascinating to see how all of this develops, especially in light of AGI.
In general, I've generalized intelligence as a measure of how many concepts or ideas you can hold in your mind at the same time. When complex concepts or novel ideas come up in conversation, it's only with the smartest people that really understand or add to the conversation. The ability to comprehend all of the elements involved to approach the topic are necessary to crystallize into the deeper or novel ideas. I don't simply mean knowing lot of facts, but holding all of the facts/ideas needed ones mind at the same time to see the new ones.
Subscribed!
It's a really cool concept and it totally makes sense. I'd say it's a good form of "4D representation". It's like the boundaries of a 4D cube.
6min The holistic existential reality is the way forward for humanity, 🙏🙏verywellsaid
Thanks Anand!
Biology, Buddhism and AI.... thank you so much :)
I’ve only gotten part way through but one of the immediate questions that came up is what is the supposed “I” or “us” that is not part of the networks that make the feeling and sensing body mind
If our individual parts have agendas, how does that comport with the idea that we're a collective intelligence? Should the emergent construct break apart? When we cut pieces of our brain, it still functions quite normally.
The individual agendas are in unison because of their entanglement with one-another. That was talked about here, how the bioelectric coupling of all the cells in a network results in a kind of dissolution of individual identity.
I think our cells aren't there to help us or work against us. The reason most of them help us is because their existence could only come about through helping the host reproduce. That's why the majority of our cells arent cancerous. And they have made us very smart too. But they don't share our goals, but they created our goals nevertheless
I made it to 17 minutes and I'm taking a pause. I might go back a bit because I caught myself on a tangent about the physical eyeball having three qualities, filtering, focusing and capturing light, and then the faculty of sight having the qualities of attention, attachment and memory, with attachment being of either negative, positive or neutral polarity, these then provocative of movement away or towards, or not, the goal being to acquire this, avoid that, or ignore it.
Damn. Lots of good nuggets here. Throw in a dash of attractor theory in an E8➡️♾️ framework and your on your way to defining quantum gravity.
Thanks Dan! Yeah, I plan to do something on attractors in the future. 😀
Want to collaborate? I’ve been thinking about GR and the omni dimensional N sphere lattice model for 30 years. Spatial lattice deformation models do a perfect job weaving together parallel world history sheets and the transcendent spaces form a perfect bulk space to enable phenomenon like entanglement and a framework for quantized spacetime to squeeze and pinch in on itself, effectively making spacetime density gradients (geodesics). I’m not a quack. I’ve done my homework. I have drawing and modeling skills and love philosophy and the arts. I’ve watched your content and your light cone models naturally play with my vision. Things get damn near spooky when you wrestle with infinite abstraction by way of hyper geometry. But it seems to be what nature gives us. I’ve said my prayers and eaten my wheaties, but seriously, an observer based generative model of quantum gravity is falling into our lap. None too soon based on the headlines. Let me know.
@@danscieszinski4120 sounds interesting! Likely beyond my present understanding... do you have a website or papers you can share?
And to clarify, the light cone model is Mike's work!
@@Carlos.Explains haha! Realized that after I fell out of my stupor of fascination. I’m working on a visual narrative for my extension of GR. However the more I look around these media spaces the more I feel like we do have the pieces all uncovered in different competencies of diagram. We’re all basically trying to graph infinity, which has been a quest for as long as mathematicians realized they were geometers in disguise 😎🤙if my ideas get any traction maybe we’ll meet some day. ✌️
@@danscieszinski4120 Awesome, best of luck with the model!
Around 1:12:00, there's a discussion of the idea that man is a machine. La Mettrie was extending the earlier idea of Descartes that animals are machines. That idea may have been inspired by mechanical automata, toys which were designed to move like living things and were collected by wealthy Europeans in the early modern era in "cabinets of curiosities". Descartes likely saw these in Prague Castle (the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperors collected them), which he entered after the Battle of White Mountain. A classic history book about this is Frances Yates's 1972 work "The Rosicrucian Enlightenment".
22min Very correctly stated that the body as a whole is a system and within that system we have many systems going upto the bacteria in the gut .
The brain is just another system. The soul or the life atom is the one that understands and has cognition. This is what seperates from the body when we call it not as a human being but a human body.
That being is permanent and would love to share the structural ontology and it's functioning of the invisible life atom😊
As much as I believe soul exists, the problem science has with that conception is that you can't study it in the lab. Would need to develop some type of instrumentation that can make those ultra high frequency, higher dimensional energies visible or measurable in some way for science to take it seriously. But then you have the fundamental philosophic problem of the chicken or the egg. How would you develop a device with those capabilities if you dont even believe it exists? Even the scientists that believe in a soul dont think its a scientific pursuit.
@@nicholassauer2612
Science is something that needs to be redefined.
Instead of making a machine that will see the soul we can look at the people dying and understand there is something that disconnects with the body that gives life.
Any physical machine will be made of physical atoms only and that is not a prerequisite to validate the existence of soul .
If this concept is clear then that is the next good step for Science.
If you would like to engage in a dialogue that will help I can set apart some time 🙏🙏
Hi Michael, you are right there are many more roads that lead to Rome. The Simulation Hypothesis assumes that consciousness can only be created by computation and thus excludes all other possibilities that are uncomputable. The Anti-Simulation Hypothesis states that since there may be infinitely many other possibilities for consciousness to emerge, the probability of living in a simulation is close to zero.
Love this! Thanks guys 😊
think about the complexity thresholds and the "flavor's of randomness" that will happen when chaos theory is fully integrated into mathematics and physics as well. physics will give quite a good domain where this new type of semi deterministic probability can occur, since it has issues with rpobability aspects like renormilization and such...
I had forgotten how much I liked science.
14.2 The cognitive capacity of human being is to be used to understand the coexistence of the formless the invisible and the form of all that exists...
Great talk !
It is not about nagivating intelligent but motivation and goal each one are defined by will and awakening
Carlos’ rambling and banal compliments are a bit tedious, but I’m still happy to see that Michael Levin is graciously doing so many of these sorts of interviews given the importance of the ground-breaking work he and his team are doing.
Thanks for the feedback Dan. I wasn't my sharpest this day, cat had my tongue all interview. I have a long way to go as an interviewer, and hope to trim the fat in future conversations.
great!!
The boundary of a self is the edge of its free agency. If that free agency is not there, then there's no person.
39 min The equilibrium state is when all the cells are all content and that is when there is festivity... And that leads to manifestation and emergence of the new more complicated system.
This could be a better way of explaining this whole concept can be more palatable and plausible 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Holy crap. This guy is freakin cool as hell. (Tu quoque)
Agreed, Franklin! Having him on again in May. :)
Change the system as the ultimate lesson here…awesome. Re-set incentives, and individuals will voluntarily shift behaviors. I wonder what is the molecular biological analogy for the power brokers in a system who preserve status quo at all costs.
All Is One. One Is All.
Fifteen minutes in and I am reminded of an old idea that the higher the degree of intelligence someone posesses the higher the level of empathy they possess. To the point that a truly intelligent/potentiated individual has the ability to see reality through perspectives other than their own.
With the way Everything is connected it would make perfect sense that humans moving up in the energy grid would correlate with us raising our ability to connect with eachother.
With Schumann resonances, solar flares, and geo magnetic/techtonic activity up the wazoo maybe Mother Earth just needs someone to talk to!
Interconnectedness is the way.
Awesome Topics. Does He find enhancement techniques based on His academic grounding?
Cognition appears to be fundamental to living things, and it is likely electrically mediated. Likewise, morphologic changes are associated with bioelectrical changes. Can higher level organism aware of the cognitive triggers for morphological change cognitively self-induce desired morphological changes? Can I change the way I look by my thoughts coupled with feelings?(eg. placebo effect) Or do cognitive processes (coupled with feelings) only effect behavior?
the subversion of objective reality by the subjectivity of will has not yet been achieved
I saw the number of likes at 69.
It took a lot of willpower to press that like button. That's how much I liked this video.
14:16 - Well, not attainable by you. But some goals are not and will never be obtainable by any one person within a single lifetime; that automatically brings into existence "progress goals," some of which can be realistically attained by a single person. Even just inspiring others to care about such a goal is progress toward it. I absolutely think we should be in the early thinking steps of leaving the planet, even though we might not actually try to do it for thousands of years.
I wonder if Dr. Levin has done any research into the immune system, whether other superorganisms suffer from cancer-like dysfunctions at the superorganism level, and how they deal with it.
Believe I saw a representation of the cognitive light cone once when I was stoned. It was spherical though.
This is great and all but what does he think about heylighen?
"there is a kinda of scale-up process by which these competent subunits. One thing we have to understand is that we are made up of very competent subunits."