Mark XLII is one of the coolest, because you can call it in one piece or in single parts. You can even emergency eject and let it control you from distance
The suitcase suit was supposed to be weaker (well plot wise) since it was more compact and just an emergency suit. That’s why he almost lost against whiplash. If he had his normal suit I guarantee he would have kicked Whiplashes ass.
@@parychahal Yeah in fact if you notice, throughout the fight the suit is constantly torn apart. You see parts fly off of it. You even see some of Stark's racing suit visible underneath the armor as it's plating is being ripped off.
I surprised that no one talked about the fact that the Mk V isn't the gold titanium alloy but is just aluminum so it'd be a hell of a lot lighter than the other suits.
I thought the exact same thing. But the thing you have to remember is that the Mark V (that suitcase armor) is an emergency suit. Thus is not designed for heavy combat. (That is why it gets destroyed beyond recognition.) I'm not trying to sound like a complete jerk. But that is what the official lore for the MCU says. (Just to put that out there.)
6:32 I think they are called “3D Volumetric Display” which currently exists in small scale prototypes. Maybe those ceiling and floor lights at the garage/lab function as volumetric projectors to display in real-time.
What if the hologram is like a live stream where what is being recorded and broadcasted is happening bow and his lab has sensors around it tracing his movement. Then would it be able to keep up with his movements with the exception of lag?
To livestream something now from twitch with minimal lag takes excellent internet and a great computer, and that's 2D, imagine doing that in 3D with an AI like JARVIS controlling everything. That is extremely difficult to do. There are sensors now that can track movements and keep up with them pretty well like in the XBOX Kinect. That is also a 2D display tho, not exactly a hologram. I wouldn't say it's impossible, but there's too much going on at once for us to replicate what Tony Stark has in his lab.
He’s not really livestreaming, he isn’t using internet to upload and receive something like that. His entire house probably has motion sensors or something for him to control his holograms
I think the way Tony interact with the holographic object(augmented reality) is the same way we interact with virtual object in a Virtual Reality using VR headset(HTC Vive).
2:30 yep. I've calculated that it weighs 20 pounds. I don't have my exact numbers but I basically calculated Tony's body surface area and multiplied that by the thickness of the suit, then used the density of titanium and gold (took the average of them) to get my answer
Concerning the new operating system for the war machine armor: Vanko (it probably wouldn’t be Hammer as he seems more of a Steve Jobs type than a Steve Wozniak type) could have started out with the OS kernel that Iron man created to power the suit, and programmed an overlay to control the additional components added.It seems likely since there would be no reason to rewrite the drivers for the hardware control of already existing components, and he wouldn’t want a Jarvis interface since he built his own. That also gives a little more realism to how Jarvis gained access to the suit so easily, since he would already have the necessary framework to communicate with the kernel, and would already know the communication protocols to connect with the suit wirelessly.
4:30 what you said is incorrect as you CAN interred with a hologram if you have a very accurate and large senser array. Plus you over looked some major factors 1. Tony is a fing genius 2. He is doing this under his home 3. He has a very advanced Ai helping.
5:22 I remember in school my teacher used a special pen to interact with the holographic board so I believe technology like this could be possible in the future
So what I'm assuming from the "interactable projection" is that it is scanned by the computer, which then creates an image out of 3D models. First thing, as an artist, I can easily see how useful this would be when creating references of real life objects, such as hands. Which then also brings me to the medical usefulness, where if you could capture hands, then you could probably use this to create a fullbody scan of a patient in order to more accurately observe whatever is wrong at little to no detriment to the patient. Now what I'm getting from the movie is that Tony has set up his whole basement area to basically be a virtual reality set where cameras and sensors can easily detect what's there and what's not. Tony is then able to have his movements be tracked and is able to use his gestures (and voice commands via UI) to control all the virtual components. I'm also assuming that it's as accurate as it is in their time simply because Tony is as smart as he is. They're obviously ahead of what we can do today. Going back to the usefulness part, having a 3D model that you could interact with using gestures and voice commands is simply way more convenient than using a mouse and keyboard on say Blender. While likely expensive as heck, convenience is as convenience does. The only question remains is how is it being projected. As there is no screen it is seemingly being projected onto and he's not wearing any kind of glasses or headset that helps him see it. Plus, he's able to manipulate it using his gestures and is able to move through it which proves that there is nothing it's being projected onto that we simply can't see. I'm not so much an engineer, so I can't really say if there is anything that could be thought up about this, but that does seem like your basic hollywood sci-fi "cool for looks" thing that is simply explained as "Tony is smart."
Actually we DO have the technology to create "a manipulative projection", as Tony Stark calls it. Because what it is is simply a hologram created by a computer being manipulated via hand gestures, which again is the technology we do have know. The problem is the software that would interpret the gestures and change the hologram accordingly - which we don't have. But that's far from being impossible to create. Basically the difference between what we have now and what Stark is using is multiple sensors at the same time and not just one like in Kinect (which was because it needed to be relatively cheap, Stark doesn't need to be concerned with that) and also the software to interpret hand gestures and manipulate the hologram accordingly (which is basically what JARVIS does). Also I disagree that there's no need for this. This is way more natural as far as displaying data goes. And also you can display far more data as a hologram than you can on computer screen. Also you should notice that Tony basically picks up a model from earlier age, probably made just for PR reasons, digitalizes it and then uses it for new project. And he does it all by himself, without involving anyone. This speeds up the designing process tremendously. I'd argue that 3D projections will certainly be a technology of the future, which will replace computer screens. But this will take a while because we still don't have the technology to create holograms without expensive machinery in home. For one 3D projections actually show you the true size of things. And also it is obviously far more entertaining to watch a movie as a hologram than on the 2D screen.
There's some degree of holographic control, some cars have holographic displays, not to mention live-streaming. The practical use of holograms, is obviously visual effects and modeling, being able to see something intuitively in 3d would be amazing.
7:05 Also that falling glass would injure a lot of people. Large amounts of glass like that falling on a large gathering of people aren't to be taken lightly. It would more than likely kill people.
Actually, for Warmachine's suit he modified the MK. II and added on some new weapons, weapons that needed a custom UI to automate. The War.achine UI is less secure than JARVIS, and was easily hacked by Whiplash.
There is some sort of technology that exists involving holograms. BMW did a whole interface for a concept car that used holograms and cameras and speakers in order to interact with the buttons. It wasn’t exactly interacting with the hologram but rather the hologram was just a display and you are really interacting with what the camera would see
Considering we saw repulsor-tech prototypes during WW2 in Captain America the First Avenger, it would stand to reason technology in the MCU is far more advanced than ours. Meaning hologram capabilities would be far more advanced than what we can conceive now, even though Ironman 2 is set in our current era. That entire room could be filled with all manner of sensors and projectors to detect and follow Tony's movement, and interact with him accordingly.
The Mk.5 suitcase armour was designed as an emergency response suit for quick suit up hidden in a portable briefcase. The suit was very weak, and didn’t use a Gold titanium alloy but rather just strait titanium. The suit had no other weapons other then repulses and was not capable of flight.
The hardware software part is interesting, but if I do say so myself, there are a lot of current machinery controlled by software in every of their movements like in robotics or the new tool that was used to perform surgery on a grape, meaning if you control the software you can control the movements the hardware makes
Why can't the holograms use gesture controls? These days you can increase the radio volume in a BMW just by twirling your finger or change stations by swiping your hand. Interactive hologram doesn't necessarily have to mean touching hard light projections. In the same way there are likely multiple holographic projectors in a given area, there could also be sensors that teach his hands and concert is seemingly touching motions into actionable commands that a computer recognizes and implements.
the part with the table bits more like augment reality then hologram though but i do think itd be difficult to have it like tony, does we have it sort of in vr headsets like i believe oculus rift s where you can see your room your playing in and interact with the system, at least not yet maybe, i love the stuff your putting out and i get to learn stuff from you, keep it up
As for the suite, it is possible to make something that is light yet strong. Titanium is a good material for strength and lightness and with advances in adaptive manufacturing, it is not about of the question to theorize that armour plates and components arent made of solid metal, but of hollow pieces of metal with nano latis structures built I to them. Maximum strength, minimum material, the same idea that brought us human bones. Our bones are light weight yet stronger than steel of the same weight because of the way the material is organized. Also. The supposed weakness f the system due to gaps in the armour can be something that could be integral to how the armour works. Most armour tries to be more solid than what it is protecting against, to which the individual pieces are, but energy from attacks can be managed in other ways as well, such as absorption, redirection and redistribution. An example would be Striking the plates on the suitcase armour's forearm, the plates themselves remain strong but the connections between them flex to absorb energy, these flexion then reverberates throughout the armour like waves in water, dispersing the energy and minimizing energy transfer to the wearer of not eliminating it altogether.
Holo Lens, game development and resaling real geometry is a very useful technology. So the holographic technology is useful for the growth of technologies in the future
When you interact with your phone's screen, what do you call that? Does it stop being your phone's screen? Of course not. So a hologram doesn't stop being a hologram just because sensors allow you to interact with it.
to the part with the hologram, maybe he has contact lenses, that are just showing hit the hologram right in front of his eyes, see-throught displays already exsists and the hologram we see is just a visualization to not be confused because of a tony stark waving random in front of him
It is a projection. His lab is a giant holographic display and there is a fullbody tracking system. He just works in very high level 3d software using nonexistent display technology.
I think the 3D hologram can be interract by using image processing. My ideal is install multiple cameras to record and use Jarvis analys the movement of tony's hands then display the image equal to that gesture. I'm sorry for my bad English.
Let’s us Tony’s argument from the courthouse and apply it to real life...the rest of the world is a good 50-150 years from coming close to being able to replicate this kind of technology
Well I’m pretty sure that with the correct technology u can can interact with a hologram like u interact with a tablet or some sort of touch screen device. The hologram projection would basically be like the screen on the tablet or laptop. Also there are plenty of applications for hologram tech for manufacturing and designing. It’s way better have a real life 3D model of something before actually making it so u can see before hand how the parts would interact with each other and have basically a whole view of everything instead of being fixed to one view. It’s sad u didn’t show one of my favorite parts in that movie where he creates a new element!!! I would have liked to see ur view on that scene!!!
The Gold Life yeah I get what ur saying. I feel like hologram technology would kind of be like maybe if a company wants the top of the line products instead of using cad. Like it might not be completely necessary but for people who want a little extra with designing and showing of or displaying their product. Holograms still tho I believe would have their advantages over viewing 3D cad designs.
@@sure1073 What advantages would they have over current CAD models? I can see it potentially being for medical practice. Rendering a patient's body with an ailment and a surgeon can perform the surgery on a hologram before the real deal. Or teaching med students with a hologram instead of cadaver so they get more practice.
The Gold Life well I feel like they would have a better advantage of display it or showing it to clients and customers. Like for example if someone were designing a car and wanted to show it off to a client or customer. Currently there are artist that create a model of the car design out of clay and other materials and that takes a long time to make. But if we had hologram technology we would be able display the render of the design easily and life size to. That’s an advantage and experience that a simple cad model couldn’t give.
First for the hologram wire frame to be real, the room would have to be filled with thousands or hundreds pinhole sensers and cameras. Second the wire frame can be created with our modern technology and if the ai specifically made each element a asset, theoretically you could manipulate the wire frame with vr technology. So the techs there just not in tony stark open world form.
3:00 no practical use? I can only imagine how useful it'd be for a constant of any kind to be able to carry around and put on their armour instantly get it on
5:27 I think I'd have to disagree. There's a very similar program (but without the holograms) that uses VR in basically the same way. It's used to make 3D models like a next level AutoCad
1:16 morse law say computer power is doubling every 2 years (actually every 18 months) so it wont be 10 times after 10 years but actually 32 times more power full than today we doubled it five times (2*2*2*2*2=32)
i think in the hologram one, there might be a software that processes the movements of tony and incorperates it into the hologram, i donno if it will be possible
It’s funny how you mention that hologram tech doesn’t really have that much practicality for functional uses. We’ve been seeing hologram projectors and monitors in movies for decades but I, and many others much smarter than me, have pointed out for years that they’d be totally impractical because of their dependency on ambient light and how they wouldn’t even have the fidelity of current screen technology. Sure, if it was exactly like Tony’s tech then maybe it could be interesting or useful for some things, but with the tech we have now it’s basically useless outside of recreating a Tupac concert...
It seems as though you're thinking of a hologram as being prerecorded; at one point, you even said the word "film." The point with the holograms (or 3D projections, or whatever you want to call them) is that they are NOT prerecorded, but are generated by Jarvis as Tony instructs. As for how he manipulates them, you are clearly correct that they have no physical properties to be directly manipulated, so I would guess that he does indeed have sensors around the entire workspace (just as he clearly has projectors around the entire workspace) that detect his movement and Jarvis then manipulates the images in a way that parallels Tony's movement. With regards to practical applications for such a technology, I have to disagree with you. Yes, 3D models can be built on a computer screen, flipped around, have layers stripped away or added, and even displayed on a bigger screen to be seen better, but it's not quite the same as having a life-size rendering of it directly in front of you--no screens or anything like that--which can be viewed from all angles and interacted with. This could help to better understand interactions with other objects or components through simulations, help with diagnostics to figure out how to approach and repair any issues...honestly, the applications of this technology seem beyond limit. And not just for engineering. Medical imagery (have a holographic display of a patient's cardiovascular system for the doctors to study in real time, or their nervous system, their skeleton, or whatever they need to inspect, zoomed in or out as needed--if they could manipulate the image the way Tony can, they could perform a virtual surgery and let the computer run a simulation to test its effectiveness, then figure out what to do differently based on the results). It would be especially useful in TEACHING (professors could display and directly interact with the 3D image rather than just a picture on a 2D screen, surgical students could perform virtual surgeries to practice rather than jeopardizing a real patient the first time they pick up a scalpel, an engineering teacher talking about hydroelectric power could display a scaled rendering of the Hoover Dam, stripping away a layer at a time to show the aspects they're lecturing about, an archaeology professor could have a full 3D rendering of the Great Pyramid of Giza where the outer layers could be stripped away to show the chambers within). A technology like this could be employed in numerous fields in many ways. Great video, but I can't help but disagree about the viability and utility of manipulatable holograms/3D projections.
I would like to address the elephant in the room and ask why you didn’t cover the Hammer Drones more. To me, that was the most interesting thing in the movie because let’s face it, who wouldn’t want an army of weaponized robots at their command. So how about it, what are your thoughts on the possibilities of this tech and what we can do to at least make it mostly a reality?
the Gold Life - the REAL life Tesla D1 AI processor chip is 100x more Compute than the BEST Apple M1 Ultra and the TESLA tech only uses 24watts as opposed to 500w in the BEST Invidia mobile processor.
If i asked you about space X you would have disagreed about their vision of reusable rocket or tesla cars so i can say in future we can have iron man or soldiers.
the Gold life - in REAL life gm & FORD motor dont even make own Vehicle hardware , they use 150+ Vendors and dont make own Controllers and each controller will use own Software , that does not work with one another. gm & FORD have to get Permission from the maker of Component to reprogram or alter its operation. TESLA is more Streamlined, they are about 60 - 80% in - house Controllers and Cybertruck (2023) will be made using about 80% in - house Controllers and 20% REPROGRAMED controllers in the Vehicle. TESLA in 2019 gained the ability to Rapidly reprogram Processor chips & Controllers. TESLA already has plans for the GEN 3 Vehicle which will use 100% in - house Controllers.
I'm thinking that what you're talking about in this video is not about how accurate the technologies you would think really are! but instead, you're talking about how you think what part of those you believe. When comes to make a good movie, it's really important to tell the accuracy of tech and all kind of staffs but what's not accurate are imaginable that what we think and want to happen. why make Cyberpunk while our technologies are not even comparable to the tech they used in the movie? And why make Alita Battle Angel? We as human beings do not want a half Cyborg half humanoid form of the body. They want to tell the story and impress us as the audience. Talking about what accurate and what you believe is different. And by the way, don't you think that Marvel themselves has the real engineering team to make a really good movie? Don't you think that Jon Favreau would think about that when he made the IronMan movies?
Question: Do you think you are a good person? If so, have you ever stolen anything, lied, looked lustfully, or used God’s name in vain? (Oh God, Jesus Christ, etc.) If you have done this, you have violated God’s moral law, you are a liar, a thief, a blasphemer, and an adulterer at heart. So, if God gave you justice right away, would you be innocent or guilty? Obviously guilty. Heaven or hell? Obviously hell because you are a criminal in God’s eyes. Don’t try asking for forgiveness, what if you tried that in court: "Judge, I raped a woman and killed her, but I’m so sorry and I won’t do it again"?You would still go to jail because you shouldn’t do it again and you should be sorry. So is there any hope? Yes, there is! Out of love and mercy, God became a human being, Jesus Christ. Jesus lived a sinless life and finally died on the cross to bear the punishment we deserve, we deserve to be punished because we have sinned. The reason why blood must be spilled for remission of sins is because the life of the flesh is in the blood, in the Old Testament Jews sacrificed animals for sins but the sacrifice of animals was enough for remission of some sins, not all. It wasn't infinite, unlike Jesus's. Jesus is the Lamb of God, the ultimate sacrifice for sins which is enough for all sins that have been done, are done and will be done. The Old Testament sacrifice of animals, the spilled blood of those animals could cleanse people from some sins but not ALL, unlike Jesus's. He was buried and rose again. His resurrection proved that His death was enough to pay our penalty, the penalty for our sins. When someone pays your fine, the judge can leave you, dismiss your case, it’s the same with God. Jesus paid our penalty and in order to accept the free gift of salvation from God, we must trust in Jesus's spilled Blood, His finished work on the Cross for our Salvation. And then your sins will be forgiven because of what Christ did, you will be saved! That's it! God bless you and feel free to ask me any questions about this. Romans 3:10 King James Version 10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: Romans 3:23 King James Version 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Romans 5:12 King James Version 12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Romans 6:23 King James Version 23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Romans 5:8-9 King James Version 8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. 9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. Romans 10:9-10 King James Version 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Ephesians 2:8-9 King James Version 8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. John 3:16 King James Version 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Leviticus 17:11 King James Version 11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. Ephesians 1:7 King James Version 7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; Colossians 1:20 King James Version 20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. 1 Corinthians 15 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: ua-cam.com/video/lbb4xwYj19g/v-deo.html
The suitcase is an emergency suit. limited in what it can do.
It's my favorite suit though.
@@CommentRodent Such a cool suit!, #50 for the nano tech :)
Yeah and in the DS movie game you can’t fly with that suit. At least, that’s what I remember.
Mark XLII is one of the coolest, because you can call it in one piece or in single parts. You can even emergency eject and let it control you from distance
@@DonaldHolbenugh nanotech is Shite
The suitcase suit was supposed to be weaker (well plot wise) since it was more compact and just an emergency suit. That’s why he almost lost against whiplash. If he had his normal suit I guarantee he would have kicked Whiplashes ass.
That makes the most sense actually
@@parychahal Yeah in fact if you notice, throughout the fight the suit is constantly torn apart. You see parts fly off of it. You even see some of Stark's racing suit visible underneath the armor as it's plating is being ripped off.
I surprised that no one talked about the fact that the Mk V isn't the gold titanium alloy but is just aluminum so it'd be a hell of a lot lighter than the other suits.
Wait, was that confirmed? I never heard it was aluminum.
I doubt it's aluminum, it's withstood Ivan's whips; the same whips that tore through cars moments earlier.
@@pink_ice9454 good point
@@pink_ice9454 It faired better than the cars, but not by much. After just one or two hits you could already see Tony's racing suit underneath.
I thought the exact same thing. But the thing you have to remember is that the Mark V (that suitcase armor) is an emergency suit. Thus is not designed for heavy combat. (That is why it gets destroyed beyond recognition.) I'm not trying to sound like a complete jerk. But that is what the official lore for the MCU says. (Just to put that out there.)
The lore is never wrong ahaha I certainly could be tho!
6:32 I think they are called “3D Volumetric Display” which currently exists in small scale prototypes.
Maybe those ceiling and floor lights at the garage/lab function as volumetric projectors to display in real-time.
I think that's actually how its explained, his whole house has sensors for the holograms
What if the hologram is like a live stream where what is being recorded and broadcasted is happening bow and his lab has sensors around it tracing his movement. Then would it be able to keep up with his movements with the exception of lag?
To livestream something now from twitch with minimal lag takes excellent internet and a great computer, and that's 2D, imagine doing that in 3D with an AI like JARVIS controlling everything. That is extremely difficult to do. There are sensors now that can track movements and keep up with them pretty well like in the XBOX Kinect. That is also a 2D display tho, not exactly a hologram. I wouldn't say it's impossible, but there's too much going on at once for us to replicate what Tony Stark has in his lab.
Better Yet a VR Headset XD
@@parychahal read my comment above, you might be surprised at what we already invented.
@@parychahal **UI**
He’s not really livestreaming, he isn’t using internet to upload and receive something like that. His entire house probably has motion sensors or something for him to control his holograms
As one of the top programmer in my class I can confirm that you can't understand other people's program that quickly.
You can kind of understand some people's program, but only once they explain what they tried to do.
I think the way Tony interact with the holographic object(augmented reality) is the same way we interact with virtual object in a Virtual Reality using VR headset(HTC Vive).
2:30 yep. I've calculated that it weighs 20 pounds. I don't have my exact numbers but I basically calculated Tony's body surface area and multiplied that by the thickness of the suit, then used the density of titanium and gold (took the average of them) to get my answer
But the MK. V is aluminum, or at least can be inferred to be aluminum.
Concerning the new operating system for the war machine armor:
Vanko (it probably wouldn’t be Hammer as he seems more of a Steve Jobs type than a Steve Wozniak type) could have started out with the OS kernel that Iron man created to power the suit, and programmed an overlay to control the additional components added.It seems likely since there would be no reason to rewrite the drivers for the hardware control of already existing components, and he wouldn’t want a Jarvis interface since he built his own.
That also gives a little more realism to how Jarvis gained access to the suit so easily, since he would already have the necessary framework to communicate with the kernel, and would already know the communication protocols to connect with the suit wirelessly.
6:52
The moment he noticed the spectacle similarity.
4:30 what you said is incorrect as you CAN interred with a hologram if you have a very accurate and large senser array. Plus you over looked some major factors 1. Tony is a fing genius 2. He is doing this under his home 3. He has a very advanced Ai helping.
You might be right, I can't say my knowledge on holograms is vast lol
5:22 I remember in school my teacher used a special pen to interact with the holographic board so I believe technology like this could be possible in the future
So what I'm assuming from the "interactable projection" is that it is scanned by the computer, which then creates an image out of 3D models. First thing, as an artist, I can easily see how useful this would be when creating references of real life objects, such as hands. Which then also brings me to the medical usefulness, where if you could capture hands, then you could probably use this to create a fullbody scan of a patient in order to more accurately observe whatever is wrong at little to no detriment to the patient.
Now what I'm getting from the movie is that Tony has set up his whole basement area to basically be a virtual reality set where cameras and sensors can easily detect what's there and what's not. Tony is then able to have his movements be tracked and is able to use his gestures (and voice commands via UI) to control all the virtual components. I'm also assuming that it's as accurate as it is in their time simply because Tony is as smart as he is. They're obviously ahead of what we can do today. Going back to the usefulness part, having a 3D model that you could interact with using gestures and voice commands is simply way more convenient than using a mouse and keyboard on say Blender. While likely expensive as heck, convenience is as convenience does.
The only question remains is how is it being projected. As there is no screen it is seemingly being projected onto and he's not wearing any kind of glasses or headset that helps him see it. Plus, he's able to manipulate it using his gestures and is able to move through it which proves that there is nothing it's being projected onto that we simply can't see. I'm not so much an engineer, so I can't really say if there is anything that could be thought up about this, but that does seem like your basic hollywood sci-fi "cool for looks" thing that is simply explained as "Tony is smart."
Actually we DO have the technology to create "a manipulative projection", as Tony Stark calls it. Because what it is is simply a hologram created by a computer being manipulated via hand gestures, which again is the technology we do have know. The problem is the software that would interpret the gestures and change the hologram accordingly - which we don't have. But that's far from being impossible to create. Basically the difference between what we have now and what Stark is using is multiple sensors at the same time and not just one like in Kinect (which was because it needed to be relatively cheap, Stark doesn't need to be concerned with that) and also the software to interpret hand gestures and manipulate the hologram accordingly (which is basically what JARVIS does).
Also I disagree that there's no need for this. This is way more natural as far as displaying data goes. And also you can display far more data as a hologram than you can on computer screen. Also you should notice that Tony basically picks up a model from earlier age, probably made just for PR reasons, digitalizes it and then uses it for new project. And he does it all by himself, without involving anyone. This speeds up the designing process tremendously.
I'd argue that 3D projections will certainly be a technology of the future, which will replace computer screens. But this will take a while because we still don't have the technology to create holograms without expensive machinery in home. For one 3D projections actually show you the true size of things. And also it is obviously far more entertaining to watch a movie as a hologram than on the 2D screen.
These Holograms would be extremely helpful in architecture
There's some degree of holographic control, some cars have holographic displays, not to mention live-streaming. The practical use of holograms, is obviously visual effects and modeling, being able to see something intuitively in 3d would be amazing.
7:05 Also that falling glass would injure a lot of people. Large amounts of glass like that falling on a large gathering of people aren't to be taken lightly. It would more than likely kill people.
Good point
Actually, for Warmachine's suit he modified the MK. II and added on some new weapons, weapons that needed a custom UI to automate. The War.achine UI is less secure than JARVIS, and was easily hacked by Whiplash.
There is some sort of technology that exists involving holograms. BMW did a whole interface for a concept car that used holograms and cameras and speakers in order to interact with the buttons. It wasn’t exactly interacting with the hologram but rather the hologram was just a display and you are really interacting with what the camera would see
Considering we saw repulsor-tech prototypes during WW2 in Captain America the First Avenger, it would stand to reason technology in the MCU is far more advanced than ours. Meaning hologram capabilities would be far more advanced than what we can conceive now, even though Ironman 2 is set in our current era. That entire room could be filled with all manner of sensors and projectors to detect and follow Tony's movement, and interact with him accordingly.
The Mk.5 suitcase armour was designed as an emergency response suit for quick suit up hidden in a portable briefcase. The suit was very weak, and didn’t use a Gold titanium alloy but rather just strait titanium. The suit had no other weapons other then repulses and was not capable of flight.
5:10 NO, In lykan hypersport super car there is an intractable hologram technology , where we can control sound system.
I did not know that....I'm very curious how it works
@@parychahal Augmented Reality is a growing form of technology, so I guess this scene can be a sort of exaggerated version of that.
The hardware software part is interesting, but if I do say so myself, there are a lot of current machinery controlled by software in every of their movements like in robotics or the new tool that was used to perform surgery on a grape, meaning if you control the software you can control the movements the hardware makes
Why can't the holograms use gesture controls? These days you can increase the radio volume in a BMW just by twirling your finger or change stations by swiping your hand. Interactive hologram doesn't necessarily have to mean touching hard light projections.
In the same way there are likely multiple holographic projectors in a given area, there could also be sensors that teach his hands and concert is seemingly touching motions into actionable commands that a computer recognizes and implements.
I love iron man
So do I !!!
the part with the table bits more like augment reality then hologram though but i do think itd be difficult to have it like tony, does we have it sort of in vr headsets like i believe oculus rift s where you can see your room your playing in and interact with the system, at least not yet maybe, i love the stuff your putting out and i get to learn stuff from you, keep it up
As for the suite, it is possible to make something that is light yet strong. Titanium is a good material for strength and lightness and with advances in adaptive manufacturing, it is not about of the question to theorize that armour plates and components arent made of solid metal, but of hollow pieces of metal with nano latis structures built I to them. Maximum strength, minimum material, the same idea that brought us human bones. Our bones are light weight yet stronger than steel of the same weight because of the way the material is organized.
Also. The supposed weakness f the system due to gaps in the armour can be something that could be integral to how the armour works. Most armour tries to be more solid than what it is protecting against, to which the individual pieces are, but energy from attacks can be managed in other ways as well, such as absorption, redirection and redistribution.
An example would be Striking the plates on the suitcase armour's forearm, the plates themselves remain strong but the connections between them flex to absorb energy, these flexion then reverberates throughout the armour like waves in water, dispersing the energy and minimizing energy transfer to the wearer of not eliminating it altogether.
Holo Lens, game development and resaling real geometry is a very useful technology. So the holographic technology is useful for the growth of technologies in the future
You should see voxon photonics so far.
What's that about
@@techphile3262 you should see their hologram technology with volumetric display.
@@manbanasiak is it like Tony starks own
@@techphile3262 go found out yourself.
When you interact with your phone's screen, what do you call that? Does it stop being your phone's screen? Of course not. So a hologram doesn't stop being a hologram just because sensors allow you to interact with it.
Iv watched 5 videos and im hooked
to the part with the hologram, maybe he has contact lenses, that are just showing hit the hologram right in front of his eyes, see-throught displays already exsists and the hologram we see is just a visualization to not be confused because of a tony stark waving random in front of him
It was a emergency suit it wasn’t meant to be used all the time it’s like using a Epipen in a emergency
How does He breath in the suit
Exactly like how, where is he storing the oxygen ?? And if yes how can it last long to use inside the suit ??
It is a projection. His lab is a giant holographic display and there is a fullbody tracking system. He just works in very high level 3d software using nonexistent display technology.
Lol... youve clearly never held a full titanium exhaust.. super lite
What is a titanium exhaust bro ??
I think the 3D hologram can be interract by using image processing. My ideal is install multiple cameras to record and use Jarvis analys the movement of tony's hands then display the image equal to that gesture. I'm sorry for my bad English.
Let’s us Tony’s argument from the courthouse and apply it to real life...the rest of the world is a good 50-150 years from coming close to being able to replicate this kind of technology
It's hilarious I seen a fellow cosplayer make the suitcase Ironman suit made of cardboard and some springs
Cameras can be sensors
Instead of gold titanium plates it just thin normal titanium plates and it’s made to be lightweight and as a emergency suit
I'm surprised that you don't talk about the hammer drones
In the beginning of the movie when whiplash creates the arc reactor. What is what he used to power it up ????
6:25 the robot in the back ground looks where ever the hologram is could he be the sensor?
Well I’m pretty sure that with the correct technology u can can interact with a hologram like u interact with a tablet or some sort of touch screen device. The hologram projection would basically be like the screen on the tablet or laptop. Also there are plenty of applications for hologram tech for manufacturing and designing. It’s way better have a real life 3D model of something before actually making it so u can see before hand how the parts would interact with each other and have basically a whole view of everything instead of being fixed to one view. It’s sad u didn’t show one of my favorite parts in that movie where he creates a new element!!! I would have liked to see ur view on that scene!!!
I think he included that scene in part 1.
CAD programs exist to view anything in 3D in exactly the way you described. They're far better then any hologram, I use them all the time
The Gold Life yeah I get what ur saying. I feel like hologram technology would kind of be like maybe if a company wants the top of the line products instead of using cad. Like it might not be completely necessary but for people who want a little extra with designing and showing of or displaying their product. Holograms still tho I believe would have their advantages over viewing 3D cad designs.
@@sure1073 What advantages would they have over current CAD models? I can see it potentially being for medical practice. Rendering a patient's body with an ailment and a surgeon can perform the surgery on a hologram before the real deal. Or teaching med students with a hologram instead of cadaver so they get more practice.
The Gold Life well I feel like they would have a better advantage of display it or showing it to clients and customers. Like for example if someone were designing a car and wanted to show it off to a client or customer. Currently there are artist that create a model of the car design out of clay and other materials and that takes a long time to make. But if we had hologram technology we would be able display the render of the design easily and life size to. That’s an advantage and experience that a simple cad model couldn’t give.
Moore's Law is an observation not an actual law and Moore himself says it's slowing down.
First for the hologram wire frame to be real, the room would have to be filled with thousands or hundreds pinhole sensers and cameras.
Second the wire frame can be created with our modern technology and if the ai specifically made each element a asset, theoretically you could manipulate the wire frame with vr technology. So the techs there just not in tony stark open world form.
Man everyone is an engineer here.
Computing power after 10 years will be 100 +
3:00 no practical use? I can only imagine how useful it'd be for a constant of any kind to be able to carry around and put on their armour instantly get it on
The suits weight would be enhanced by Tony’s own weight so it would increase in mass
5:27 I think I'd have to disagree. There's a very similar program (but without the holograms) that uses VR in basically the same way. It's used to make 3D models like a next level AutoCad
1:16 morse law say computer power is doubling every 2 years (actually every 18 months) so it wont be 10 times after 10 years but actually 32 times more power full than today we doubled it five times (2*2*2*2*2=32)
i think in the hologram one, there might be a software that processes the movements of tony and incorperates it into the hologram, i donno if it will be possible
What kind of science do we have to understand in depth in order to be an engineer? (Ex physics or chemistry etc)
More physics then anything else
@@parychahal lol
You are underated
It’s funny how you mention that hologram tech doesn’t really have that much practicality for functional uses. We’ve been seeing hologram projectors and monitors in movies for decades but I, and many others much smarter than me, have pointed out for years that they’d be totally impractical because of their dependency on ambient light and how they wouldn’t even have the fidelity of current screen technology. Sure, if it was exactly like Tony’s tech then maybe it could be interesting or useful for some things, but with the tech we have now it’s basically useless outside of recreating a Tupac concert...
This dudes clearly never seen motion capture studios... The whole studio is a giant Kinect basically.
Can the nano tech armour like mk 50 or mk 85 be built in real life??
Not yet
Getting closer every day. In medicine now, we are using nanobots for medicine delivery.
No chance, nanotechnology for what your asking isn't even viable. Nanotech is still in its infancy.
I see mark V is lighter than spiderman suit in Spiderman Homecoming
i'm very late but if he has lenses in his eyes,maybe he has a sensor on this very lense,if the sensor move with him no problem ;)
It seems as though you're thinking of a hologram as being prerecorded; at one point, you even said the word "film." The point with the holograms (or 3D projections, or whatever you want to call them) is that they are NOT prerecorded, but are generated by Jarvis as Tony instructs. As for how he manipulates them, you are clearly correct that they have no physical properties to be directly manipulated, so I would guess that he does indeed have sensors around the entire workspace (just as he clearly has projectors around the entire workspace) that detect his movement and Jarvis then manipulates the images in a way that parallels Tony's movement. With regards to practical applications for such a technology, I have to disagree with you. Yes, 3D models can be built on a computer screen, flipped around, have layers stripped away or added, and even displayed on a bigger screen to be seen better, but it's not quite the same as having a life-size rendering of it directly in front of you--no screens or anything like that--which can be viewed from all angles and interacted with. This could help to better understand interactions with other objects or components through simulations, help with diagnostics to figure out how to approach and repair any issues...honestly, the applications of this technology seem beyond limit. And not just for engineering. Medical imagery (have a holographic display of a patient's cardiovascular system for the doctors to study in real time, or their nervous system, their skeleton, or whatever they need to inspect, zoomed in or out as needed--if they could manipulate the image the way Tony can, they could perform a virtual surgery and let the computer run a simulation to test its effectiveness, then figure out what to do differently based on the results). It would be especially useful in TEACHING (professors could display and directly interact with the 3D image rather than just a picture on a 2D screen, surgical students could perform virtual surgeries to practice rather than jeopardizing a real patient the first time they pick up a scalpel, an engineering teacher talking about hydroelectric power could display a scaled rendering of the Hoover Dam, stripping away a layer at a time to show the aspects they're lecturing about, an archaeology professor could have a full 3D rendering of the Great Pyramid of Giza where the outer layers could be stripped away to show the chambers within). A technology like this could be employed in numerous fields in many ways. Great video, but I can't help but disagree about the viability and utility of manipulatable holograms/3D projections.
Carbon nanotubes?
I would like to address the elephant in the room and ask why you didn’t cover the Hammer Drones more. To me, that was the most interesting thing in the movie because let’s face it, who wouldn’t want an army of weaponized robots at their command. So how about it, what are your thoughts on the possibilities of this tech and what we can do to at least make it mostly a reality?
the Gold Life - the REAL life Tesla D1 AI processor chip is 100x more Compute than the BEST Apple M1 Ultra and the TESLA tech only uses 24watts as opposed to 500w in the BEST Invidia mobile processor.
BECAUSE HES TONY STARK MA DUDE
Whiplash will just hack stuff to get him able to do that
You didn't even talk about how tony created a new element?
watch part 1 lol
moore's law is not correct anymore due to physical boundaries (we cant go much smaller anymore)
Minor nitpick: overriden, not overwritten.
You should have have more subscribers
You can really help me out by sharing your favorite video of mine on your social media platforms! I would really appreciate it!
Not difficult when ur from the future though 👀👀👀
There are hologram keyboards.
If i asked you about space X you would have disagreed about their vision of reusable rocket or tesla cars so i can say in future we can have iron man or soldiers.
Only iron man fans will watch this
or engineers
There's a lot of iron man fans out there lol
the Gold life - in REAL life gm & FORD motor dont even make own Vehicle hardware , they use 150+ Vendors and dont make own Controllers and each controller will use own Software , that does not work with one another.
gm & FORD have to get Permission from the maker of Component to reprogram or alter its operation.
TESLA is more Streamlined, they are about 60 - 80% in - house Controllers and Cybertruck (2023) will be made using about 80% in - house Controllers and 20% REPROGRAMED controllers in the Vehicle.
TESLA in 2019 gained the ability to Rapidly reprogram Processor chips & Controllers.
TESLA already has plans for the GEN 3 Vehicle which will use 100% in - house Controllers.
I'm thinking that what you're talking about in this video is not about how accurate the technologies you would think really are! but instead, you're talking about how you think what part of those you believe. When comes to make a good movie, it's really important to tell the accuracy of tech and all kind of staffs but what's not accurate are imaginable that what we think and want to happen.
why make Cyberpunk while our technologies are not even comparable to the tech they used in the movie?
And why make Alita Battle Angel? We as human beings do not want a half Cyborg half humanoid form of the body.
They want to tell the story and impress us as the audience.
Talking about what accurate and what you believe is different. And by the way, don't you think that Marvel themselves has the real engineering team to make a really good movie? Don't you think that Jon Favreau would think about that when he made the IronMan movies?
You are not Tony stark. Then only you are sealing like that
8:12
Fake iphones they resell here in the philippines and china
Also, he did the software for Hammer so he know the ins and outs of the system.
umm take undertale for example
This guy definitely is not a iron man fan.
Question: Do you think you are a good person? If so, have you ever stolen anything, lied, looked lustfully, or used God’s name in vain? (Oh God, Jesus Christ, etc.) If you have done this, you have violated God’s moral law, you are a liar, a thief, a blasphemer, and an adulterer at heart. So, if God gave you justice right away, would you be innocent or guilty? Obviously guilty. Heaven or hell? Obviously hell because you are a criminal in God’s eyes. Don’t try asking for forgiveness, what if you tried that in court: "Judge, I raped a woman and killed her, but I’m so sorry and I won’t do it again"?You would still go to jail because you shouldn’t do it again and you should be sorry. So is there any hope? Yes, there is! Out of love and mercy, God became a human being, Jesus Christ. Jesus lived a sinless life and finally died on the cross to bear the punishment we deserve, we deserve to be punished because we have sinned. The reason why blood must be spilled for remission of sins is because the life of the flesh is in the blood, in the Old Testament Jews sacrificed animals for sins but the sacrifice of animals was enough for remission of some sins, not all. It wasn't infinite, unlike Jesus's. Jesus is the Lamb of God, the ultimate sacrifice for sins which is enough for all sins that have been done, are done and will be done. The Old Testament sacrifice of animals, the spilled blood of those animals could cleanse people from some sins but not ALL, unlike Jesus's. He was buried and rose again. His resurrection proved that His death was enough to pay our penalty, the penalty for our sins. When someone pays your fine, the judge can leave you, dismiss your case, it’s the same with God. Jesus paid our penalty and in order to accept the free gift of salvation from God, we must trust in Jesus's spilled Blood, His finished work on the Cross for our Salvation. And then your sins will be forgiven because of what Christ did, you will be saved! That's it! God bless you and feel free to ask me any questions about this. Romans 3:10
King James Version
10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Romans 3:23
King James Version
23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Romans 5:12
King James Version
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Romans 6:23
King James Version
23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Romans 5:8-9
King James Version
8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
Romans 10:9-10
King James Version
9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Ephesians 2:8-9
King James Version
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
John 3:16
King James Version
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Leviticus 17:11
King James Version
11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
Ephesians 1:7
King James Version
7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;
Colossians 1:20
King James Version
20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
1 Corinthians 15
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
ua-cam.com/video/lbb4xwYj19g/v-deo.html