Criminal Law - Attempts

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @Alena-yf4bz
    @Alena-yf4bz 6 років тому +8

    Yo, you taught me more than a semester of comparative justice systems class :) Thank you for the lovely explanations. Could you maybe label the videos as English law, though? I started watching a random video of yours (not in order) and therefore only realized later that I'm not looking at a comparative perspective, but a specific country :)

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  6 років тому +2

      Hi Alena. I'm glad these videos have been helpful. I'll adjust the metadata to indicate its English Law. Drop me an email if you'd like to discuss on assignment and/or exam preparation: shaveen@outlook.com. Cheers.

    • @Alena-yf4bz
      @Alena-yf4bz 6 років тому +1

      Thanks a bunch!!!

  • @jengable4888
    @jengable4888 Рік тому +1

    If law enforcement has knowledge that an attempt on someone's life is going to occur, they have to act.

  • @maxselwyn3538
    @maxselwyn3538 7 років тому +2

    bloody good video guv

  • @JCResDoc94
    @JCResDoc94 6 років тому

    1:40 80% attempt actus reas

  • @k.nandinik.nandini7794
    @k.nandinik.nandini7794 2 роки тому +1

    what is the maximum sentencing for attempted burglary

  • @denh0006
    @denh0006 4 роки тому

    Would this translate to Canadian Law ?- i would think it would but just want to check

  • @llobss
    @llobss 8 років тому +1

    Is this video relevant to U.S. criminal law?

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  8 років тому +1

      Hi Lobsang. No, these videos are based on English (UK) Law.

  • @jameysummers1577
    @jameysummers1577 6 років тому

    So, when the police set up a sting, and there is no person or thing to act against. How can a person be charged with "attempt" when nothing existed to commit a crime against? I can see if one goes to rob a real brick and mortar bank, but not when a sting is set up to where there is no target to commit a crime against.

  • @AngSt3r13
    @AngSt3r13 5 років тому

    I'm struggling with how to prove the Mens Rea for attempted theft. How can I show that he intended the full offence?

  • @lets-live
    @lets-live 8 років тому +1

    how to write the answer if asked in 20 marks...

  • @munamalin9646
    @munamalin9646 9 років тому +1

    this is quite good is just your accent that i have hard to understand

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  9 років тому +1

      Muna Malin Hi. Thanks for the feedback. I will work on it for the next set of videos :)

    • @munamalin9646
      @munamalin9646 9 років тому

      geat job , can you do something on how to answer exam questions

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  9 років тому

      Muna Malin
      Yes, working on a course and a set of videos targeting answering examination questions. I will be uploading it soon! :)

  • @niveditasingh2211
    @niveditasingh2211 4 роки тому +1

    everything is fine but why are talking in fake accent

  • @AngSt3r13
    @AngSt3r13 5 років тому +1

    I'm struggling with how to prove the Mens Rea for attempted theft. How can I show that he intended the full offence?

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  5 років тому +3

      Hi. An attempt is anything more than merely preparatory in commission of the full offense. However, that relates ONLY in relation to the actus reus. The mens rea remains the same as the full offense. If you'd like to discuss further on answer formulation, drop me an email: shaveen@outlook.com

    • @AngSt3r13
      @AngSt3r13 5 років тому +1

      The Law Simplified that would be above and beyond, thank you 👍