Japan's Navy 2024 - 2030
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- How capable is the JMSDF? What will it look like in 2030?
This briefing will examine the vessels & fixed-wing combat acft that make up the JMSDF in 2024, & look at the likely ORBAT of 2030.
References:
International Institute of Strategic Studies "The Military Balance 2024"
Defense Buildup Program: www.mod.go.jp/...
9:42 couldn't expect a fellow Aussie to miss that lovely Richie Benaud reference did you?
"Chu for chu chu chu"...
Japan's five-year mid-term defense plan(MTDP) is being formulated, and plans for naval vessels through 2027 have already been finalized.
Considering the life of the naval vessels and the case that the comments of the Cabinet and the Ministry of Defense are realized,
the next plan up to 2032 can also be estimated.
Estimates for FY2032
SSK Taigei class 10 (Planned 12 , Experiment 1)
Soryu class 12
Oyashio class 3 (Training 2)
DDH Izumo class 2
Hyuga class 2
DDG DDGX* 2 (Planned 6 , Succeeded by Kongo class)
Maya class 2
Atago class 2
Kongo class 4
DD Asahi class 2
Akizuki class 4
Takanami class 5
Murasame class 7
FFM New FFM* 10 (Planned 12)
Mogami class 12
OPV New OPV* 12 (Planned 12)
ASEV ASEV* 2 (Planned 2)
LST Osumi class 3
AOR New AOR* 4 (Planned 4 , Succeeded by Towada class)
Mashu class 2
Quick, find my cargo pants, find some snacks
Unlike others, I feel that for Australia to have and operate a light carrier would stretch our ability to protect it, in other words the carrier would need to be interwoven into an American Task Force. I would like to see a analysis of China Army Navy versus, USA, Japan and Australia match up, 2024 - 2030.
I have done the PLAN and USN of 2028, and the RAN surface fleet of 2028 and 2033.
@@Strategy_Analysis
You need to add in the RCN. We deploy globally, one of the few ‘Second Tier’ countries with that need and capability.
We are largely dependent financially with our trade with China. Who said in the future we wouldn't deploy with the PLA-N?
@@COLINJELY
Actually you are not. Look at the raw data. Most of what you get from China is low quantity.
@@waynesworldofsci-tech are your taking the p*ss. low quality? you need to take another look at the tech mate.
Japan has a number of ships/boats that ought to be of interest to Australia: the Maya destroyer, the Mogami frigatend theTaigei submarine. I wonder how many Taigai subs we could have for AUS385 billion! More than eight I would guess.
Backfit Spy-6/latest Aegis block, BMD capability to all of Japan's AAW destroyers and Japan will have a highly capable destroyer fleet, Maya will basically be an early Block III Burke
Important thing to note as well: Japan has a very robust and developed shipbuilding industry. They're very good at building and delivering ships on time that are cheap and highly capable.
Indeed. Something that might become important for Australia as it looks to quickly bring into service a new frigate.
日本の艦艇は非常に高価ですよ。中国ほど安く無い。
@@日本の正義-e8p Japanese ships are more expensive than Chinese ships, but much cheaper than American and other Western powers.
Would coast guard of Japan be able to do anti-sub warfare too? its really hard to find information about coastguard of Japan so that content would be more novel and more unique than this easily obtainable info about combat vessels.
Oustanding , I would like to know more about Australia's Ghost bat drone, it's been a long time since any update plus the RAN's new Ghost Shark unmanned attack / intel sub.
Point of interest , I hear that the U.S Navy is planning on equipping their Arleigh Burke class destroyer's with Patriot SAM / air defense missile's .
9:39 Excellent time call there, Richie!
What is the farthest deployment by Izumo? what is the range of this navy, are they brown waters or can they operate somewhere far?
the f-35b would be operated by the JASDF, but yes they'll be operated from JMSDF vessels
Yes. I do mention this in the briefing. Perhaps in a similar manner to the RAF.
@@Strategy_Analysis i think they try to safe money on training & management of the aircraft since if they put it under MSDF they'd need to start from zero sice they didn't operate any kind of fighter
@@Strategy_Analysis ayy also can you made more video about S.E.A nation such as malaysia, indonesia, singapore, philippines, etc
@@fujii_natsuooooo I will be covering Singapore and Indonesia this year.
@@Strategy_Analysis nice to hear that, that 2 countries alongside with Philippines would be a important US partner if the conflict in the pacific really starting in the future
How many working Shipyards now operate in Japan?
Could you do Indonesia or the Philippines next please?
Then all the pasific islands including territorys like French Polynesia.. you have already done my great country so no need to include it but a video looking at everything all the other small islands have would be nice... I mean they have a total population of just under my country so mabey they have a total amount simmaler
Any chance of the Royal Navy and its future Frigates being examined?
Love your channel every Saturday. You must be working hard to deep dive like you do
Yes I will be covering the RN this year.
Excellent briefing! Thx
Would appreciate more info about hellicopters that they are using, maybe even in the separate video.
AUKUS could become JAUKUS. In the context of the AUKUS or eventually the JAUKUS, the United Kingdom must double the strength of its SSNs, going from 6 to 12 SSNs... At least. ...Although the ideal would be 14. With Japan like Australia, contributing with 8 SSN; ... At least.
Thank you! I remember asking for this in your comments awhile ago and you actually did it, thanks man.
No worries. I do try to do a briefing on as many as possible of the suggestions I get. Sometimes I can't do them for a variety of reasons.
Would be cool to see a video examining whether Australia could be capable of using F-35b on our Canberra-class.
They can operate them in terms of deck strength and are capable of refueling them. What they lack is the weapons stowage for them. Operating 4 to 8 for short periods would be possible but without an awacs they are lacking in direction. Still a capability we should have used.
Done already I believe
Missing 5 FFM frigates 2030.
theres video called China's Type 052D Destroyer vs. Taiwan's Entire Surface Navy , if you watch it and do stuff like that, it would be awesome, we need more content like that
Do you do graphs? like there are AI tools that allow to make pretty visualisations. You can upload different ships in there and vizualize them. You can for example upload ships and their enter into service date and see % of new and old in a visual format.
Another great video.. by the way do you plan to cover the PLANAF reorganization.. you are the only UA-camr on existence who covered PLA army aviation structure
Yes I do plan to cover it. I have done one some time ago but that was focused on platforms and not structure.
Hmmmm. Did I hear a little bit of Ritchie Benaud/12th man sneak in with the Mogami class?
Indeed you did.
Can you just sum up VLS numbers for the entire navy in the end? Same about displacement. Just make a sum number of combat displacement ships without support and subs. For subs can do that too separatelly, or compare the number of torpedo tubes in total or rockets on them. We need metrics to compare, and thsoe are direct metrics.
No, they are not. You have to be able to lock on the target.
Thanks for the briefing.
Thank you.
Izumo class is a brilliant play by Japan, on the one hand it entered service as a "Helicopter carrier" to alay Chinese fears and now has raised the ire of them by being able to carry the F35.
14:42 you should mention 12 of New FFM the which is scheduled to be completed in 2028
Do you mean the Mogamis? I do mention them, with at least 10 and possibly 12 to be in service by 2030.
@@Strategy_Analysis No. "New FFM" is not Mogami, it is basically up-scaled version. 12 of Mogami-class is going to be built by 2027. another 12 are New FFM and they will be built by 2028. I'm not sure that fast to be built, some articles claim it will be only take 5 years.
Jmsdf is actually genuinely criminaly overrated.
Would love to see a video on options if Australia acquired a light carrier. My personal choice would be the South Korean DSME light carrier design of 30,000 tons. It would have a ski jump that the above design does not have, it would be armed with VLS ESSM missiles plus either Mk15 CIWS or the Searam system along with typhoon cannon systems or other weapon. Any other contenders could be the Italian Trieste ship or an enlarged Cavour class carrier.
Interesting. Don't think there'll be much money available due to the SSNs. If for some reason Australia didn't end up getting the SSNs, who knows?
@@Strategy_Analysis Lets hope that we see some common sense and scrap AUKUS before we spend too much more. There are many, many more viable options available.
I think Australia should get very close with South Korea, they will be Pre eminent ship builder/designers moving forward.
@@peteranderson7497
Scrapping AUKUS would be a mistake. Those subs will be a far greater deterrent than anything else planned by Australia.
@@waynesworldofsci-tech agreed
If you are implying the Japanese Navy is somehow "off"--then you are way off the mark--you just have to look back at their history, and record, which predates most navies i know of
I'm not suggesting the JMSDF is "off". Some others are.
Thank you
No worries. Glad you enjoyed it.
You really take suggestions or just saying it? You need to mention missiles and ranges more. Cause if the missiles or torpedoes are old, then it doesn't matter how many of them are, if they are slow and if they are outranged by missiles of every navy in the region. Plus in the future navy might get new missiles, making old ships more lethal.
One needs to assess the complete weapon system, all the constituent parts. This also includes training and how the system is employed.
Do they have enough ammo?
Good question. I can't answer that. But given recent events elsewhere in the world, that should be foremost in their minds!
Can you do more videos about shipyards? Liek what are japanese shipyards, where they located, on which cost, how far they are from china, how many ships they make?
Agreements, Accords, Contracts, promises from the US worth less than the paper they are printed on these days. Not me saying it. It's happening in front of our eyes.
At 09:43, a very Richy Benaud pronunciation... 2022 lol
Indeed. In homage to him.
Alright, fellas, are you feeling funky? Are you feeling hip?
Give me a "Yo!" (Yo!)