South Korean Navy is Stronger Than You Think

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лис 2023
  • The Republic of Korea Navy is one of the more powerful in Asia. We review some of its most important warships in this video.
    Want to support the channel?
    / eurasianavalinsight
    www.buymeacoffee.com/navalins...
    Keywords: Republic of Korea Navy, Sejong the Great class, Yi Sun-sin class, Dokdo class LPH, Daegu class, Incheon class, Chungnam class, KSS, Dosan Ahn Changho class, Son Won Il class, AEGIS, destroyers, frigates, submarines, amphibious warships
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 407

  • @DesignatedVictim
    @DesignatedVictim 6 місяців тому +56

    Just like China, South Korea's enormous ship building industry provided the foundation of a modern navy fleet with both quantity and quality.

    • @ulikemyname6744
      @ulikemyname6744 5 місяців тому +1

      Quality is not guaranteed! Quality comes for standards and regulations that are enforced to ensure the quality standards are met. And even then this can't necessarily be translated to big navy. Tanker or cruise ships have very little in common with naval ships. The metals are different, the equipment is different and imagine if you are making for example a nuclear carrier. It would take years and years before that shipyard would actually capable of making such ship with the quality standards needed to actually make it.
      Ofc there are advantages. You have the people that need less training for the job and you have most of the infrastructure needed to make the ship when it comes to building the actual ship.

    • @manj5228
      @manj5228 4 місяці тому

      @@ulikemyname6744 china navy ships are junk like their commercial ships. south korea navy ships are partly adapted modern technologies from usa's and uk's

    • @Forevertrue
      @Forevertrue 2 місяці тому

      Better than China they have morals and ethics and a nation worth fighting for. A nation of freedom with a future. China offers a nation of slavery and drudgery.

    • @goodjob3314
      @goodjob3314 Місяць тому +6

      Shipyards in China and Korea are completely different. China mainly builds container ships, but Korea builds LNG ships and drill ships. 80% of the world's LNG ships are manufactured in Korea. On the other hand, 80% of the world's container ships are made in China. LNG ships mainly made in Korea are 300 meters long, but container ships mainly made in China are 1 km long. If the length is 3.3 times, the volume is 27 times. Although Korean LNG ships are 27 times smaller than Chinese container ships, the price of Korean LNG ships is much higher. The difference is technology. Because China does not have the technology, even if it builds a ship that is 27 times larger than Korea's, it must sell it cheaper than Korea.

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 17 днів тому +1

      @@goodjob3314 learn more shipping before make d.u.m.b comment

  • @yonggheelee1743
    @yonggheelee1743 Місяць тому +11

    Korea has been building its military strength led by the army, so few countries in the world can beat the Korean army. The army has 500,000 active-duty soldiers and over 3 million reserve soldiers. If more troops are needed, it can mobilize up to 10 million soldiers. And they are all veterans who have served in the military.
    Finally, Korea has begun to strengthen its navy. We can build Aegis destroyers and submarines. And we are constantly building battleships and submarines. This doesn't stop until we can beat China. It's a historical destiny.
    And Korea is also strengthening its air force. The final task in the air force field is to localize fighter engines. This is also under way according to the plan, and the development will be completed by the early 2030s.
    Then Korea will become a country where everything can be made domestically. Korea is one of the few countries in the world that can make and use everything if needed. If the fighter engine manufacturing technology is completely independent, Korea will become a country like the U.S. and France.
    Korea is the second country in the free world to make its own multi-layered air defense network after the U.S. This is also almost in the completion stage. Korea's military power is currently ranked fifth in the world, but within 10 years, it will catch up with India and establish itself in fourth place. We will grow our military strength faster than we have ever run, and frankly, we don't know how far it will go. But what is certain is that it continues without stopping.
    To sum up, we can make everything except for one thing now, but in 10 years, we can make everything. And we will continue to increase our defense capabilities by investing the highest level of defense budget. Koreans think that military buildup in the navy and the air force is just beginning.

  • @ducha74
    @ducha74 5 місяців тому +24

    The SK weapon industry has recently emerged as a rising competitor with China, Japan and European power houses ! They're not only capable of building everything from ships to fighter jets but also their products are in high quality and praised highly !

    • @boredatsea
      @boredatsea Місяць тому

      Yet where do they get their resources from??

  • @bangmo7
    @bangmo7 6 місяців тому +62

    SK biulds ships and subs in a very precisely scheduled manner. Every batch/ship has newer and stronger features than the previous one. Almost one new destroyer every year or ever two years. Same with corvettes and subs. Radar, sonar, torpedoes and missiles. This continuous evolution is the most formidable feature.

    • @okapmeinkap7311
      @okapmeinkap7311 6 місяців тому +3

      Yes, very formidable. Like fermenting keechees for the hirohitos nowadays.

    • @bangmo7
      @bangmo7 6 місяців тому

      @okapmeinkap7311 China should not have given or let Russians give nuke and missile parts and tech to North Korea. Most of the major Chinese coastal or near-coastal cities are within 300 to 1,000 km from some point of Korean peninsula. These days, . SONARs can identify the sound of a ship or sub from several thousands of kilometers away.
      Good electromagnetic listening (ESM) can identify the direction(angle) of the emitter very, very quickly. And can memorize the electromagnetic signature of an every sea, land, or airborne emitter. A most advanced anti-ship missile can home-in using this EM signature, without turning on its small radar.
      SK is building ships with these capabilities. All Chinese ships and subs are being tracked in real time. China should have made North Korea much less provocative. But China has been doing the opposite·.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +3

      well, all gears are from US or germany or dutch, otherwise there is no any vessel could be built in korea

    • @fookcheonkhaw7147
      @fookcheonkhaw7147 6 місяців тому

      I am wondering if South Korea has the capability to build aircraft carriers and luxury cruise ships. So far China is the only country which can build aircraft carriers, LNG tankers and luxurious cruise ships, all of which are the pinnacle of shipbuilding industry.

    • @dabda8510
      @dabda8510 6 місяців тому +4

      @@fookcheonkhaw7147 They can. But it doesn't make sense financially.

  • @ytn00b3
    @ytn00b3 5 місяців тому +25

    Historically, Koreans were good with shipbuilding, they've built naval fleet for Kublai Khan during 13th century and known for naval power in Asia but sadly they're not given much credits when they've developed earlier versions of smaller onboard ship cannons and ballistic launchers since early as 14th century.

  • @juanlugo7492
    @juanlugo7492 5 місяців тому +39

    Korea had one of the most successful Naval Commander in history Admiral YI Sun Sin always went into battle against superior numbers and always came out on top

  • @someonerandom6137
    @someonerandom6137 6 місяців тому +35

    I've read somewhere that Sejong the Great Class destroyers are secondly only to the Kirov in terms of missile load, US sometimes classifies them as cruisers.

    • @tx9ju
      @tx9ju 6 місяців тому +4

      Lol, Dream on!

    • @redosorio5278
      @redosorio5278 4 місяці тому +6

      @@tx9ju yes they are. SK destroyer are more heavily armed destroyer with a total number of 128 VLS with a 4 quadruple ASM, compared to US arleigh burke class destroyer 96 VLS & 2 quadruple ASM, and SK destroyer much larger and heavier with a length of 170m and 11,000 tons displacements, compare to US only 154m in length and 9-10 thousand tons displacements. SK destroyers are classified as battle cruisers in NATO standards.

    • @DerrickLanders-nt3tg
      @DerrickLanders-nt3tg 2 місяці тому

      Well, we have almost one hundred Destroyers and you have twelve...that says it all.

    • @quail6129
      @quail6129 Місяць тому +4

      @@DerrickLanders-nt3tg nobody is comparing the usn with south korean navy lol. they just saying that south korean 'destroyers' are comparable to cruisers, just like german 'frigates' are basically destroyers.

  • @captjinxmarine9832
    @captjinxmarine9832 3 місяці тому +18

    Yes the Korean Navy is larger than most people understand but you missed the two most important weapons and they are the highly trained sailors plus the ROK Marines. I’ve trained with both and they are motivated. The Marines are some of the very best Marines in the world.

  • @justsomehaatonpassingby4488
    @justsomehaatonpassingby4488 5 місяців тому +15

    I'm more excited for the possible prospect of SKorea employing a modern take on battleships, the Arsenal Ships

  • @stefanratkiewicz
    @stefanratkiewicz 6 місяців тому +15

    The South Korean Navy is no sideshow . Thanks for the update.

  • @ycplum7062
    @ycplum7062 6 місяців тому +18

    It kind of makes sense. Frigates and helicopter carriers do the anti-sub mission. Destroyers provide the air defense for them.

  • @c123bthunderpig
    @c123bthunderpig 6 місяців тому +20

    The South Korean Army are the most tenacious warriors in the world - I have no doubt any of their military services are any difference

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@hkangtt-kd2fn that was 70 years ago. No conflict has happened since, only small skirmishes. Even those skirmishes, the South always prevailed.

    • @c123bthunderpig
      @c123bthunderpig 5 місяців тому

      @@michaellim4165 so your are agreeing with my statement, whenever we engaged the enemy in Vietnam with Koreans there were no prisoner taken. All of :-)their armored forces are aggressive to this day especially their Navy, North Korea's Navy doesn't have squat

    • @Cheolism
      @Cheolism 5 місяців тому

      ​@hkangtt-kd2fn You're stupid
      North Korea = old fashioned
      South Korea = Latest
      South Korea wins ok?

    • @c123bthunderpig
      @c123bthunderpig 4 місяці тому

      Sorry for delay - I can not confirm or deny the joint operations with South Korean Army took POW's

  • @phils4634
    @phils4634 6 місяців тому +47

    Certainly heavily armed, and being modern vessels, reliable and secure intership communication is assured. Certainly very elegant vessels, even the earlier ones.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +2

      well, all gears are from US or germany or dutch, otherwise there is no any vessel could be built in korea

    • @srree6822
      @srree6822 5 місяців тому

      @@xinyiquan666 noob^^

    • @user-ry5bw6bx2y
      @user-ry5bw6bx2y Місяць тому

      ​@@xinyiquan666The U.S. or Germany, but the Netherlands, a small country on the periphery? Lol

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 Місяць тому

      @@user-ry5bw6bx2y neitherrland is way stronger than south korea, dutch is indepedant country, SK is a colony

    • @NoA-oz6kr
      @NoA-oz6kr 2 дні тому

      @@xinyiquan666 Taiwan is an independent country and a true China

  • @jamesbugbee9026
    @jamesbugbee9026 6 місяців тому +10

    They're not shy about the use of 5" guns, even on 3000 ton ships ❤️

    • @ycplum7062
      @ycplum7062 6 місяців тому +7

      The 5" gun out ranges the guns of the North Korean corvettes and gunboats that are not armed with missiles. A significant portion of the NK navy is pre 1960s.

    • @poil8351
      @poil8351 20 днів тому

      ​@ycplum7062 Unfortunately the North koreans do have one advantage many of their vessels are small enough to slip past south korean forces and land infiltratiors onto south korean territory and sabotage south korean vessels or lay mines.

  • @himat007
    @himat007 6 місяців тому +5

    Thanks for the excellent coverage.

  • @raxit1337
    @raxit1337 4 місяці тому +2

    Love this channel, it increasingly comes up with topics I just happen to look for. Already subbed a while back. Do you ever touch on civillian shipbuilding or do you focus on military stuff only?

  • @claudeclaudenderpro
    @claudeclaudenderpro 6 місяців тому +12

    Hey could you maybe show the numbers on screen when listing for example how many ships of each type they have? Or important facts in general. Nice video as always👍

  • @Senbonzakura776
    @Senbonzakura776 6 місяців тому +10

    Great vid, and awesome to see one on the South Korean Navy.

  • @goodjob3314
    @goodjob3314 Місяць тому +3

    The reason that there were not many types of Korean missiles in the past is because the United States blocked the development of Korean missiles based on range restrictions. The use of solid fuels has also been prevented. Therefore, the development of private rocket technology was completely blocked. However, since it was lifted two years ago, we could see many different types of missiles in the future. And rumors say that South Korea has already secretly completed the development of an ICBM.

  • @peterk6431
    @peterk6431 5 місяців тому +14

    Korean submarine prowess is legendary. Just ask the US navy what they did during the RIMPAC exercises.

    • @sadasasdas8467
      @sadasasdas8467 4 місяці тому

      What happened? Genuinely curious

    • @ateocara3683
      @ateocara3683 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@sadasasdas8467In the Limpac exercise, the U.S. aircraft carrier was wiped out with Korea's smallest submersible. The U.S. commander was very angry. So the two drills resulted in the annihilation of the U.S. aircraft carrier.

    • @boredatsea
      @boredatsea Місяць тому

      Find that hard to believe, but it was an exercise and there are usually rules regarding exercises, though once a submarine fires her weapons , she has exposed herself and then opens the possibility of being attacked by numerous platforms and if she cannot get fast enough will only become a coffin for the crew onboard. @@simbaski

    • @boredatsea
      @boredatsea Місяць тому

      Did not hear that one, but then I was not involved in Rimpac 2000,so cannot confirm, though as I have said before, once a sub exposes a periscope, radar or anything similar they are open to EW inception and therefore lies the problem of saying one sub sank 10 or more ships unless they were civilian shipping.@@simbaski

    • @boredatsea
      @boredatsea Місяць тому +2

      have had several COs that were Sub commanders, what you described is how Subs can attack multiple targets, there is a youtube video that came out a few years back describing how an Australian Collins class was able to attack a US aircraft carrier.@@simbaski

  • @86that11
    @86that11 6 місяців тому +5

    Thank you so much. I really find this navy has come a long way. 😝

  • @ser43_OLDC
    @ser43_OLDC 6 місяців тому +2

    Can you talk about the Spanish navy or the new s80 subs?

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 6 місяців тому +6

    They are powerful I like it

  • @ateocara3683
    @ateocara3683 2 місяці тому +2

    When Korea first made semiconductors, they said it was ridiculous

  • @chloekrueger3003
    @chloekrueger3003 6 місяців тому +18

    ROKN is underrated to related much on News and Media, they are less attention compare to Japan's, because of China's respond Claim, while S. Korea stay hidden and dealing with N. Korea on Land Forces than its Navy. S. Korea somehow next to Japan's Top Asia Strong Navy with good building ships like they had sell it on Philippines, 2 Friagtes, they already had a Submarine, later for future its Carrier that already planned, the ROKS CVX

  • @Castragroup
    @Castragroup 6 місяців тому +2

    Can you cover iran navy

  • @GeoPoliticsCommentry
    @GeoPoliticsCommentry 6 місяців тому +6

    First One to say Happy to see another Naval Update especially with Russian Korean cooperation.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +4

      This 1 is about South-Korea.
      Do you think SK and the Russian Federation are having joint-naval-exercises?

    • @hotpot6352
      @hotpot6352 6 місяців тому +5

      South Korea aided Ukraine with 155mm artillery shells, which angered Russia. Kim Jong Un just visited Russia not long ago.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому

      Go learn proper English.
      You clearly dont understand.

    • @cjclark1208
      @cjclark1208 6 місяців тому

      @@hotpot6352 SK is a moderately powerful puppet to US whims same as Japan, Russia is not angry more like disappointed.

    • @GeoPoliticsCommentry
      @GeoPoliticsCommentry 6 місяців тому +1

      @@hotpot6352 North Korea supplied Russia a nice amount of Ammo angering America

  • @user-pr6xd4zo6c
    @user-pr6xd4zo6c 4 дні тому

    Oh, i worked korea navy 2years ago

  • @JD-dm1uj
    @JD-dm1uj 6 місяців тому +15

    I firmly believe if the US, SK and JP stuck together, the PRC would have a snowball’s chance…in a full scale naval conflict.

    • @superpooper_2030
      @superpooper_2030 6 місяців тому

      Impossible because South Korea is scared of North Korea land invasion

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +5

      they always stick together, but in that case, all three together still far behind china's navy in terms of quality and quantity , let alone it would never be a solo navy vs navy conflict, all bases in korea and japan are under missile from china or even remote rockets, or i dont have to say north korea sweep south in one day

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 6 місяців тому +1

      No need for a head-on naval battle. There are many vantage points in East and Southeast Asia to place anti-ships missiles. Beside Taiwan and Japan, they could also place them in South Korea maybe even in the Philippines and Vietnam.

    • @royalpanther6391
      @royalpanther6391 5 місяців тому +1

      US? Stop including the US in a region where it's far away from their land. USA should mind their business just within USA or maybe the entire continent of americas. It should be Japan+SK+Taiwan vs China+NK+maybe Russia.

    • @superpooper_2030
      @superpooper_2030 5 місяців тому

      @@johnsilver9338 That’s including all USA shore and occupied islands including Guam, Hawaii and Diego Garcia

  • @winterkks
    @winterkks 2 місяці тому

    If you look at the specifications, it is a cruiser.

  • @avus-kw2f213
    @avus-kw2f213 4 місяці тому +3

    A United Korea would be very powerful
    Nearly 80,000,000 Koreans with A large military & atomic weapons
    Korea would be on the same level as Japan

    • @Xyy2387
      @Xyy2387 23 дні тому

      Lol what a fucking troll.

  • @soupnazi8061
    @soupnazi8061 5 місяців тому +5

    Only a fool would under estimate the South Korean Navy and Japanese " self defence Forces" Navy.

  • @commie5211
    @commie5211 6 місяців тому +8

    No doubt, South Korea has a competitive shipbuilding industry.
    I mean south and north Korea is connected by land, what is the point for having landing ships?

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  6 місяців тому +9

      Island disputes with both NK and Japan, me think

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому

      Only second to the PRC.

    • @anonfilly7335
      @anonfilly7335 6 місяців тому +10

      I'm Korean
      The point of large landing ships is having a large marine force forces north korea to use more of it's army in defending the coastline, reducing the numbers of NK soldiers on the frontline. Just like how India plans on using her navy in a land war against Pakistan.
      Of course the large LHD is maded Dokdo, which are contested Islets with Japan. However the Islets are too small to land on with these large LHDs, and SK lacks the capability to do landings on any other large island of other great powers.
      Also, SK still have large islands she needs to service, as well as North Korean islands.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +13

      You ment you are South-Korean.
      Because North-Koreans are also Koreans.
      I think North-Koreans are more Koreans then you South-Koreans.
      At least North-Korea isnt occupied and colon-nised by the USA

    • @valortrader
      @valortrader 6 місяців тому +3

      @@taiwanstillisntacountry great reply

  • @user-qb4mo6uh5c
    @user-qb4mo6uh5c 6 місяців тому +6

    Highly disciplined people

  • @user-rs5qc9pv5b
    @user-rs5qc9pv5b 6 місяців тому +15

    SK can build all the kinds of ship by herself. Destroyer, Frigate, Colvet, Submarine, Carrier…Great marine power

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +3

      well, all gears are from US or germany or dutch, otherwise there is no any vessel could be built in korea

    • @user-rs5qc9pv5b
      @user-rs5qc9pv5b 6 місяців тому +6

      @@xinyiquan666 Japan is the same. All the navies of western countries use the same gears of RR, GE which are so better than china’s

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +5

      @@user-rs5qc9pv5b no, japans gear is 30 years behind china, also japan does have its own gear, while all gears of korean vessel are from US or europe, its all old jks like 50 years behind china

    • @user-rs5qc9pv5b
      @user-rs5qc9pv5b 6 місяців тому +9

      @@xinyiquan666 u crazy? China submarine use MTU engin and china engin is so poor, u can’t sell ur submarine for Thailand. Thailand didn’n accept ur poor engin…u know that? ㅋㅋ

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +4

      @@user-rs5qc9pv5b chinese sub use chinese engine, never MTU, chinese engines are so good, only corea could not make its own engines, thats why every engine on its vessel is MTU or from US or uK, thailand has signed the deal with chinese engines , you did not knw that? idt

  • @hazeroth
    @hazeroth 6 місяців тому +5

    Go Goryo! The compact country that definitely could!

  • @freeabramsanton2229
    @freeabramsanton2229 5 місяців тому

    Southeast Asia is really a hell level.

  • @comicalmushroom4790
    @comicalmushroom4790 15 днів тому

    the R.O.K navy are some of the best Kpop artists in Korea their music is what real Kpop is

  • @hasaneurope4603
    @hasaneurope4603 3 місяці тому

  • @minhmeo9506
    @minhmeo9506 6 місяців тому +20

    The SK shipbuilding is too excellent that they became the target of NK hackers for many times. While much of the information is expected to be sold to China, some is kept as a basis to improve NK's aging, low-quality and low-output shipbuilding industry.
    In NK, due to the separation of its East and West coasts, the relative negligence of trade and shipping due to the North Korean defense, and the systematic closure of the shipbuilding industry, the level of the shipbuilding industry is not well-received. It is in very poor condition. In terms of shelf-building technology, facilities and capacity, and amount of construction, it is estimated that the overall level of shipbuilding industry technology in North Korea remains at the level of South Korea's late 1960s.

    • @user-bl4xi1ec9r
      @user-bl4xi1ec9r 6 місяців тому

      韩国军舰明显抄中国055

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому

      well, all gears are from US or germany or dutch, otherwise there is no any vessel could be built in korea

  • @jgl4443
    @jgl4443 5 місяців тому +5

    South Korea NAVY has 76,000km gun.

  • @FerNando-ys5hc
    @FerNando-ys5hc 6 місяців тому +2

    All we need is the fact about their warships features not just talking too much without proof

  • @scarlet_squadron
    @scarlet_squadron 5 місяців тому

    島山安昌浩級は通常動力型でVLSあるのか。海自も次の潜水艦はVLSを搭載する方針らしいけどどうなるか...

  • @mosesracal6758
    @mosesracal6758 5 місяців тому +2

    The lighter tonnage of SK Ships have been rumored to be them cutting armor on these ships but then again armor in ships nowadays isnt that important as the goal for ships right now is to not get hit in the first place. Still South Korea's MIC is still new and premature but it is very competitive.

  • @jokerofMI6
    @jokerofMI6 6 місяців тому +14

    It's only as strong as the foreign suppliers allows it to be.

    • @Mycatsbirthdayparty
      @Mycatsbirthdayparty 6 місяців тому +4

      You could say this for all navies except for China's

    • @puppydude4308
      @puppydude4308 6 місяців тому

      Noo Korea technologies 75%

  • @HeavenlyMandate
    @HeavenlyMandate 6 місяців тому +4

    you forgot south korean flag on the thumbnail

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  6 місяців тому +3

      I didn't include it because it is already in the foreground and on the destroyer...

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +4

      Independent Korea is🇰🇵.
      🇰🇷 Is a vassal state.
      An occupied country.
      Maybe even a colony.
      It cant even command their army in a crisis situation.
      Very embarrassing.

    • @jonaspete
      @jonaspete 6 місяців тому +1

      @@taiwanstillisntacountry virgin

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +1

      Your mother?
      Because you come out of her beHind.

    • @Dragon24123
      @Dragon24123 6 місяців тому

      ​@@taiwanstillisntacountryvery true North Korea is true independent Korea while the south is just puppet state

  • @thaikim9903
    @thaikim9903 5 місяців тому

    NORTH KOREA 🇰🇵 STRONG MORE THAN YOU THINK TOKENS SOUTH KOREA EASY ( THAT VERY DANGEROUS)

  • @zhli4238
    @zhli4238 6 місяців тому +16

    SK navy is under American control. Burke’s Ageais combat system phased array radar is popping up everywhere now, but how many can they build under American control?

    • @DJs021
      @DJs021 6 місяців тому

      They can build but can't threaten American navy hence SoKo navy is always behind U.S navy. And the best part is peoples literally believe SoKo navy can defeat PLAN easily.

    • @royellwilkinson6177
      @royellwilkinson6177 6 місяців тому +7

      No it's not SK is an Allie

    • @supahsmashbro
      @supahsmashbro 6 місяців тому +1

      @@royellwilkinson6177 America controls S. Korea, literally controls their army in times of war, and the US soldiers whom regularly harass the locals are literally above the law, and the Koreans pay for this. Not to mention how deeply the US controls politics there. No doubt about it, S. Korea is a US vassal

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому

      yeah, all gears are from US or germany or dutch, otherwise there is no any vessel could be built in korea

    • @ronmaximilian6953
      @ronmaximilian6953 6 місяців тому

      The US has exported at the age of system and SPY-1 radars to Spain, Norway, South Korea, Japan, and Australia.
      The South Koreans are planning to replace their oldest class of destroyers with a new one that also has This system. Frankly I'm surprised if they're not making a play for the newer spy 7

  • @fatdoi003
    @fatdoi003 6 місяців тому +3

    their destroyers still use PESA radar not AESA...

  • @cariopuppetmaster
    @cariopuppetmaster 6 місяців тому +2

    Why are the King Sejong class even called "destroyers" they are cruisers !

    • @poil8351
      @poil8351 20 днів тому

      They basically copied us navy naming conventions for ships. Which currently classify ships like the second the great class as destroyers and not cruisers for some reason.

  • @spencer7404
    @spencer7404 5 місяців тому

    If only the Korean Navy could make their own decisions.

  • @IleneMcvicker
    @IleneMcvicker 5 місяців тому +4

    South Korea's navy is number one in the world.
    All of Asia is no match for South Korea.🤔

  • @enzhus
    @enzhus 6 місяців тому +3

    东亚怪物房里的当然都不会差了

  • @hichic4390
    @hichic4390 6 місяців тому

    Please, please, my mighty lord😲 , the greatest of all time,😆🤤
    Forgive the world this time, and don't use your deadly infinite power🤣🤣😅

    • @dr.j5642
      @dr.j5642 2 місяці тому

      funny how you chinese are so triggered by a little nation like South Korea

  • @taiwanstillisntacountry
    @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +8

    SK?
    Dont let the bed-bugs bite😂😂😂

    • @davidmoss2576
      @davidmoss2576 6 місяців тому

      The have a good military, just not very large in size but still very good.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +1

      What does the millitary has to do with their bed-bugs?
      Maybe their millitary also bitten by their bed-bugs?😂😂😂

    • @jonaspete
      @jonaspete 6 місяців тому

      They contract it from mainland China

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 6 місяців тому +4

      How is the NIPAH-VIRUS doing?

    • @jonaspete
      @jonaspete 6 місяців тому

      @@taiwanstillisntacountry sub Chinese

  • @okapmeinkap7311
    @okapmeinkap7311 6 місяців тому +7

    LMFAO. Does an average South Korean approve their "president" dining and playing guitar to entertain the japanese prime minister?

    • @mgntstr
      @mgntstr 6 місяців тому

      waaow president can play the guitar so well as to entertain foreign dignitaries

    • @okapmeinkap7311
      @okapmeinkap7311 6 місяців тому +1

      @@mgntstr like Geisha girls playing lute and reciting "poems" to entertain their johns. Lmfao 😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @mgntstr
      @mgntstr 6 місяців тому

      @@okapmeinkap7311 😂😂🤣🤣😃😃😄😄😅😅😆😆prostitute to president! What incredible social mobility in Korea. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • @Touhtr
      @Touhtr 5 місяців тому

      Crazy man 미친놈

  • @Narses_the_aremnian
    @Narses_the_aremnian 6 місяців тому +6

    frist

  • @BOPENKK
    @BOPENKK 6 місяців тому

    Biasa aja 🙄
    🇮🇩👈💪💪💪

  • @xinyiquan666
    @xinyiquan666 6 місяців тому +3

    well, all gears are from US or germany or dutch, otherwise there is no any vessel could be built in korea

    • @ty23mb48
      @ty23mb48 5 місяців тому

      중국놈~

    • @Cheolism
      @Cheolism 5 місяців тому

      Why do the Chinese keep harassing Korea? They say they are communists
      South Korea, the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands are friends.
      China is the enemy

  • @vlhc4642
    @vlhc4642 6 місяців тому +12

    If South Korea was located somewhere else their naval power might be relevant, but as it is 3 out of 4 of their neighbours are nuclear armed, 2 out of those 3 are nuclear armed superpowers with hypersonic ASMs that can wipe out SK's entire surface navy within 30 minutes with plenty to spare for their intended USN targets, and the last of those 3 has a mutual defence treaty with one superpower and weapons supply deal with another.
    So end of the day it doesn't actually matter what South Korea has, their security is entirely dependant on staying on good terms with much powerful neighbours and not get themselves in trouble by picking fights they can't win (Taiwan).

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 5 місяців тому +5

      Chinese propaganda.

    • @ateocara3683
      @ateocara3683 2 місяці тому

      Pay attention to the L-sam missiles that Korea has developed. Korea speaks quietly about new weapons development because it is conscious of its neighbors.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 2 місяці тому

      @@ateocara3683 I don't think you comprehend what it means to fight a country with orbital bombers.

  • @dominicdominguez9928
    @dominicdominguez9928 19 днів тому

    Announcer is very biased very annoying

  • @tx9ju
    @tx9ju 6 місяців тому +2

    Except for the casing, everything is imported😜

    • @ateocara3683
      @ateocara3683 2 місяці тому +2

      Usually, only Chinese and Japanese people say that

  • @kevinkevin-iv5fw
    @kevinkevin-iv5fw 6 місяців тому +44

    The South Korean navy is the first in the universe, India's navy is far behind.

    • @m.varentinoputrapratama9049
      @m.varentinoputrapratama9049 6 місяців тому +3

      In my opinion, the Indian Navy is still superior in the Asian region, even very superior in South Asia, with sufficient quantity and weapons which are now starting to be modernized and even become the most complete Arsenal of forces, both from Surface Ships, Aircraft Carriers, as well as Reconnaissance Aircraft and Coastal Missiles. All of them are a mixture of Israel, America, the Soviet Union/Russia, England, France, even the country were present even before South Korea started.

    • @user-bl4xi1ec9r
      @user-bl4xi1ec9r 6 місяців тому +3

      ​@@m.varentinoputrapratama9049印度军力可以打1.5个韩国,全球战力第四

    • @okapmeinkap7311
      @okapmeinkap7311 6 місяців тому +4

      ​@@m.varentinoputrapratama9049 *They even have an ATM machine to facilitate gambling on their "aircraft carrier" which has no aircrafts.*

    • @supahsmashbro
      @supahsmashbro 6 місяців тому +7

      @@m.varentinoputrapratama9049 I hesitate to even call India a paper tiger because it's not even a tiger. The virtue of having a large population therefore some money doesn't equate to strength. In 50 years India will be a real regional power though

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 6 місяців тому +3

      @@m.varentinoputrapratama9049 majority of the Indian Warships are Indian made, but okay.

  • @Harry-lw4dm
    @Harry-lw4dm 6 місяців тому +3

    South Korea ranks first in shipbuilding capacity, Japan is second, and the United States is third. South Korean Navy will be #1 in the universe soon. India only is #4

    • @iamtanec
      @iamtanec 6 місяців тому +8

      I google "ship building ranking by country" and found that you are lying.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 6 місяців тому +4

      in terms of naval shipbuilding capacity with the current amount of naval ships under construction, China is at no.1, followed by US and then India.
      S.Korea is nowhere in the race.

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 5 місяців тому

      No where did he say military. He said shipbuilding capacity.

  • @user-ki7bs3rv7i
    @user-ki7bs3rv7i 5 місяців тому

    Another declaration of an iron dome?
    A very crucial mistake to reveal the military capability.
    However, nothing in this video are true... 🤭🤫
    Very entertaining video.
    If I want deception, I'd go to Israel. Not that strong,. 🤓

  • @Sk-xe6es
    @Sk-xe6es 4 місяці тому +1

    A joke couldnot even save your own children
    What a joke Sk navy first save your own people then talk about protecting your ocean boundaries

  • @michaelwan4268
    @michaelwan4268 6 місяців тому +4

    every korean have two dady, korean one and US one,so theyhave double power😂

  • @fookcheonkhaw7147
    @fookcheonkhaw7147 6 місяців тому

    The 2 Koreas have been separated for too long already. If Kim Jung Un decides to start reunification process, will he succeed this time? South Korea has US backing but North Korea will have the support from both China and Russia. Remember that all of them are nuclear states. Perhaps the endgame and end results will be very similar to Vietnam.

  • @mobiuszero1018
    @mobiuszero1018 6 місяців тому +1

    South Korea relies too much on American technology...What the hell do they do If and when America collapses(to say things here are ripe for another revolution is putting it mildly)?
    I hope South korea has some kind of Contingency plan if the U.S,for one,breaks up USSR style...

    • @adilccu
      @adilccu 6 місяців тому

      South Korea has been a China's vassal state over one thousand years. When US finally withdraw military from east Asia, Korea and Japan will return to serve their previous master.😅

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 6 місяців тому

      I mean, the American technology they use were all from the 1980s, so we're already seeing what happens when South Korea gets cut off from modern weapons.

  • @namelesswarrior4760
    @namelesswarrior4760 6 місяців тому +3

    One of 3 American Colonies by defaults in Asia! Weakest link in Asia.

    • @thebigmon
      @thebigmon 5 місяців тому +2

      A wealthy and powerful American colony. What country are you from?

    • @namelesswarrior4760
      @namelesswarrior4760 5 місяців тому

      @@thebigmon Me? The very poor and backwards MIDDLE KINGDOM

    • @thebigmon
      @thebigmon 5 місяців тому +1

      @@namelesswarrior4760 I have no idea what you said. It's such a simple question yet so difficult to answer.

    • @Cheolism
      @Cheolism 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@thebigmonSuch foolish words
      Only the Chinese do it. ok?

    • @powerupyo
      @powerupyo 4 місяці тому

      maybe you're so stupid because you keep drinking gutter oil. chinese "food" is disgusting to normal people but not to chinese "people"

  • @user-tb6uj9hz6k
    @user-tb6uj9hz6k 5 місяців тому

    More than 400 South Korea students died....in the shinking ship.
    South Korea denied the helping from Japanese ship.
    So sad....how arrogant South Korea people are.

  • @user-mr1zf9sr7e
    @user-mr1zf9sr7e 6 місяців тому +2

    Is there South Korea? Is it sovereign? Is it a state of the United States, an American dog?

    • @davidgibson3631
      @davidgibson3631 6 місяців тому

      you talk like North Korea

    • @Touhtr
      @Touhtr 5 місяців тому

      미친놈

    • @Cheolism
      @Cheolism 5 місяців тому

      Either China or North Korea
      communist losers without freedom😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @ateocara3683
      @ateocara3683 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@davidgibson3631I think it's China😂

    • @suzukik9833
      @suzukik9833 Місяць тому +1

      Hi chinese

  • @JesusBuddha
    @JesusBuddha 5 місяців тому

    Army is strong but Navy is rubbish.......Navy tech in Korea is 20years behind, period.

  • @Wvk5zc
    @Wvk5zc 6 місяців тому +3

    Ah.. this american puppet navy is quite impressive indeed